solving challenges in defect inspection of advanced optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • non-contact...

31
Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics

Upload: others

Post on 30-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics

Page 2: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Welcome to the Webinar

• For best audio experience, everyone is on mute

• For questions, use the Chat

• Questions will be answered at end of webinar

• Webinar is recorded and will be available offline

• Feel free to share and forward to colleagues

9/20/2019 2Bruker Confidential

Page 3: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

ForewordBruker Nano Surfaces division

9/20/2019 3Bruker Confidential

Atomic Force Microscopy3D Optical Microscopy WLI & Focus Variation Stylus Profilometry

Universal Mechanical Testing and Tribology

Multiphoton & Super-ResolutionFluorescence Microscopy

Hysitron Nanomechanical Testing

Bruker Nano Surfaces DivisionPioneers in Microscopy, Metrology & Mechanical Testing

Page 4: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Focus of today

• Quality control of high-end optics

• On surface

• Beyond classical visual inspection

• Solutions through direct measurement of topography

• Non-contact profiler based on interferometry

• Information on automation and data processing

• Strategy to detect defects on complex shapes

• Strategy to measure large and aspheric optics

• Final defect map

9/20/2019 4Bruker Confidential

Page 5: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Background

Page 6: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Fine Optics for Advanced ApplicationsDefect review

• Usually smaller optics

• Size below 100x100x80 mm3

• Performances of optics are critical

• High-quality focus

• Zero defect

• 100% inspection

• Manual and/or high-end polishing

• Defects cause:

• Spurious diffraction/loss of function

• Issue in assembly

• Defects can only be detected through topography measurement

9/20/2019 6Bruker Confidential

Inertial detection

system / gyrolaser

eUV litho system

High Laser

power Optics

Page 7: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Metrics for High-Quality Optics

9/20/2019 7Bruker Confidential

From Glass Processing Course (Lehigh University; Spring 2015)

Tayyab Suratwala, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Sub-nm roughness

Lateral resolution ~ 1 µm

Page 8: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Non-Contact Interferometric Profiler

Page 9: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Non-Contact Interferometric ProfilerKey components

Broad white

illumination

Monochromatic

illumination

Page 10: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Non-Contact Interferometric ProfilerCore modes to get topography

9/20/2019 10Bruker Confidential

Moto

r scannin

g

Broad white

illumination

Monochromatic

illumination Pie

zo s

cannin

gVertical

Scanning

Interferometry

Phase Shifting

Interferometry

Page 11: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Non-Contact Interferometric ProfilerCore attributes

9/20/2019 11Bruker Confidential

Vertical resolution independent from

objective

• Vertical scanning: ~3 nm

• Phase Shifting: 0.01 nm

• Ability to use super long working distance objective

True vertical metrology below 1nm

• Performances of interferometer

Robust method:

• Shiny & matte

• Smooth & rough

• No fringe = no data

Sub-µm lateral resolution

• Only limited by objective

• Independent and individual pixel processing

Interferometric Profiler

Page 12: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Non-Contact Interferometric ProfilerCore attributes - illustration

20. September 2019 12

Sa=28 nm

Mirror (90% reflectivity)

190 nm diameter pillarsspaced by 900 nm

Si/SiO2

Sa=0.07 nm Sa=0.75 nm

Anti-reflective coating (0.4% reflectivity)

Page 13: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Solutions for quality control

9/20/2019 13Bruker Confidential

Page 14: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

1. Power Spectrum Density

9/20/2019 14Bruker Confidential

Page 15: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Power Spectrum DensityAutomatic acquisition

9/20/2019 15Bruker Confidential

Stephen.Hopkins
Typewritten Text
Stephen.Hopkins
Typewritten Text
Stephen.Hopkins
Typewritten Text
Stephen.Hopkins
Typewritten Text
Stephen.Hopkins
Typewritten Text
View Video
Stephen.Hopkins
Typewritten Text
Stephen.Hopkins
Typewritten Text
Stephen.Hopkins
Typewritten Text
Stephen.Hopkins
Typewritten Text
Stephen.Hopkins
Typewritten Text
Page 16: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Power Spectrum DensitySingle graph representation

9/20/2019 16Bruker Confidential

Vertical scale

±0.5 nm

Form removed

Page 17: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

2. Automatic inspection

9/20/2019 17Bruker Confidential

Page 18: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Quality ControlDefect review

• Current solutions are time and user consuming

• Manual inspection by operator

• Normaski microscope

• Inconsistency

• User dependent

• No vertical metrology

• Proposed solution

• Full automation

• Unattended operation

• Complete metrology

• Robust versus all situations

9/20/2019 18Bruker Confidential

Inertial detection

system / gyrolaser

eUV litho system

High laser

power optics

Page 19: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Quality ControlAdvanced mode to get topography

9/20/2019 19Bruker Confidential

Steady and smooth slopes

Sub-µm lateral resolution

High-reflectivity contrast Accurate sub-µm roughness

Accurate stepped surface

Large field of view

Self-adapting mode

combining Phase

Shifting and Vertical

Scanning modes

Page 20: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Quality ControlNeed for 100% automation

9/20/2019 20Bruker Confidential

Auto-Focus

• Ensure reproducibility and throughput

• Robust & multi-points based

Auto-Tip/Tilt

• Ensure reproducibility and best performances

• Robust operation based on slope measurement

Auto-Intensity

• Self-adapting to different samples and conditions

• Robust operation with 100% success

Analysis

• Operator independent and on-fly analysis

• Fast & complete defect characterization

Clever Saving

• Only defective dataset are saved and displayed

Result Display

• Database summary

• Automatic launch for defect map 3rd party software

Page 21: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Full Characterization of DefectsDirect saving of all parameters

9/20/2019 21Bruker Confidential

3D topography

Peaks

Pits

X

Y

• A Diameter: mean diameter derived

from defect area

• X & Y Diameters: length and width

along X & Y directions

• Rp%: highest point for peak defect

• Rv%: deepest point for pit defect

Direct and

automatic

export of

whole tab

into CSV file

Page 22: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Direct Recording of ResultsCustom CSV file

9/20/2019 22Bruker Confidential

Life database update

Summary for peaks:

1. Number of detected peaks

2. Maximum average diameter

3. Maximum length of peak along XY

directions

Summary for pits:

1. Number of detected pits

2. Maximum average diameter

3. Maximum length of pit along XY

directions

Page 23: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Defect Detection by SlopeHigher throughput and more robust

• Automatic analysis based on slope variation

• Robust and efficient way to spot defects:

• Faster processing: directly from Raw image

• Irrespective of shape/form/local slope

• Robust versus noise or vibrations

• Multiple region analysis to get data on each defect

9/20/2019 23Bruker Confidential

Topography image on aspheric

lens

Derivative image

Page 24: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Defect Detection by SlopeIllustration of throughput

9/20/2019 24Bruker Confidential

Stephen.Hopkins
Typewritten Text
View Video
Stephen.Hopkins
Typewritten Text
Stephen.Hopkins
Typewritten Text
Page 25: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Defect DetectionLive monitoring

9/20/2019 25Bruker Confidential

Number of peaks detected versus location Maximum number of peaks detected for each row

Live statistic for all parameters

Page 26: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Defect MappingExcel display examples

9/20/2019 26Bruker Confidential

Peak mapping on glass surface prior to cleaning Peak mapping on glass surface after cleaning

Total Number Defects 2362 #

Maximum Peak Height 3.5 µm

Maximum Length Extension 493 µm

Total Number Defects 120 #

Maximum Peak Height 2.5 µm

Maximum Length Extension 186 µm

Page 27: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Defect MappingDisplay of critical defects

• Severity factor can be worked out from multiple parameters:

• Number of defects

• Maximum length of defect

• Maximum depth/height of defect

• User can place weight on each of those parameters to work out final ranking of severity

• Sphere width represents here the value of severity, providing visual comprehensive map of main defects

• Operator can easily judge if defects are located in too sensitive a region

9/20/2019 27Bruker Confidential

Page 28: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

3. Solution for large and aspheric optics

9/20/2019 28Bruker Confidential

Page 29: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Large and Aspheric OpticsUnique solution

9/20/2019 29Bruker Confidential

2.4m

50kg

>1000kg

0.55 m

Roughness repeatability – 1X objective

Sa = (289±5) pm

Sq = (365±6) pm

Courtesy of TNO, Delft

Page 30: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

Conclusion

• Non-contact interferometric profiler has shown full capability to:

• Spot defect in effective way

• Fully characterize each defect

• Main reasons for reliable defect review:

• Robust measurement modes

• Complete software automation suite

• Defect review extends to large and aspheric optics with large frame

• Extra discussion needed? Contact [email protected]

9/20/2019 30Bruker Confidential

Page 31: Solving Challenges in Defect Inspection of Advanced Optics · 2019. 9. 21. · • Non-contact profiler based on interferometry • Information on automation and data processing

© Copyright Bruker Corporation. All rights reserved.

www.bruker.com