source…the taste test source rivers trial applications review
TRANSCRIPT
Source…the taste test
Source Rivers Trial Applications Review
Purpose of Trial Applications
• Assess Source Rivers in an application for a target river system to
determine:
•Source meets eWater Partners modelling requirements for water resource planning
and management (ie, “Fit for Purpose”) – a complete integrated package
•How well Source performs against existing modelling tool – comparisons to IQQM,
REALM, BIGMOD
•influence the software development process itself - direct link between model
testing & ongoing model construction
• Wide variety of different river systems to test the usefulness of
Source – good coverage
Macintyre Brook
Pioneer
Murrumbidgee
Murray River: Lower Lakes to Colignan
Goulburn-Broken-Loddon-Campaspe
Namoi River
Goulburn river
ACT
Melbourne metropolitan catchments
Trial applications established in 2008/2009
Locations of Source Rivers Trial Applications
Murray River: Upstream of Lock 9
Source Rivers Feature Macintyre Brook, Qld Namoi, NSW GBCL, VicMurray River, SA &
MDBA
Comparison model platform IQQM IQQM REALM MSM BIGMOD
Confluence, inflow, gauge, loss, splitters
Minimum Flow Requirement
Maximum Order Constraint
Storage
Weir
Wetlands
Water User > Demand models
Water User > On-farm storages
Link flow routing
GSWIT Groundwater
Constituent routing
Ownership in development
Resource Assessment Systems
Continuous Sharing
Continuous Accounting
Annual Accounting in development
Murray-style accounting in development
Off allocation
Ordering systems
Rules-based Ordering system
Network Linear Programming (NetLP) Monthly model
• Feedback to development
• Producing content for User Documentation – SRG and User Guide
• Development and delivery of Source Rivers training
• Trial Application workshops
–Forster a community of practice
–Progress updates on each trial application
–Feature demos
–“How to build plugins” workshop
Trial Application involvement in Source
• Reporting on outcomes of trial applications and assessing Source capabilities
•Formal reporting requirements for SEWPAC/NWC funding agreement
•“fitness for purpose” report
Outcomes of Trial Applications
• All were successful in configuring Source Rivers to simulate their
target systems.
• In general, all reported that Source Rivers compared well to the
outputs of the existing modelling platform,
–most differences explainable or an improvement due to enhancements in
functionality.
• Modelling complex interactions of target system highlighted:
–Areas where Source improves upon existing modelling platforms
–areas that require usability improvements and documentations/guidance
for converting to Source
–Innovative approaches to modelling aspects of river system if
functionality was unavailable
Outcomes of Trial Applications
• Some discrepancies were reported and still require investigation
–Critical defects preventing testing resolved in latest release
–On-going process of testing and review
• Problems with performance of load and runtimes; stability
• Beneficial features
–Expression editor: widely used, flexible, powerful tool
–Chart tool: visualisation, first-cut analysis of scenario results
–Outputs: easy export of required results; great variety of outputs
–Plugins: customised functionality, extensibility (although steep learning
curve)
Summary of recommendations
• Improving the performance and stability of Source.
• Continue testing existing and new features within the current trial
application project.
–Continued investigation of differences in outputs between Source Rivers
and existing modelling platform
–Continued testing of existing functionality as defects and issues are fixed
by the Source development team (ie, Source Rivers version 2.17 & 2.18)
–Testing required functionality not available this year
–Expansion of trial application beyond agreed requirements
Summary of recommendations
• Continue Source Rivers code development to provide
functionality that has been identified as essential to
complete the trial applications.
• User Interface & tools improvements
–Chart tool functionality – more features
– expression editor – improve usability & docs
–recording outputs – descriptions, improved selection
So…Yum or Yuck?
• Yum, but needs cream and sprinkles!
• Full reports and feedback from other trial applications collated into
Summary report at end of Nov – endorsed by Rivers URG
• Inform work plan for 2012 and beyond
• Final workshop next week – take stock of past few years
Thanks to all involved in the Rivers Trial Applications!