south korea’s energy strategies and...
TRANSCRIPT
Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre
South Korea’s Energy Strategies and Prospects
Asian Energy Security and Implications for the U.S.Seattle, 28 – 29 Sept 2004
Yonghun JUNG Ph.D.Vice President
Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre
Jung 2
Outline of PresentationEnergy Demand and Supply of Korea
Drivers for Energy DemandOutlook of Total Primary Energy DemandCrude Oil Supply SourcesEnergy Seasonality
Energy Efficiency ImprovementImportance of Nuclear Power GenerationKEDORegional Cooperation
Pipeline Gas ProjectsPower Interconnection Projects
Summary of Korea’s Energy Situation and ProspectsImplications to the U.S.
Jung 3
Characteristics of Energy Demand and Supply, and Energy Policy in Korea
DemandStrong demand for industry, transport and residential and commercial
sectorsSeasonal differences in peak demand
Peak demand for electricity falls on summer, while that of gas comes in winter.
SupplyVery few domestic energy sources
High import dependency (Oil: the world 4th importer, LNG & Coal: 2nd )
Short-term orientationEconomics first rather than security (high reliance on Saudi)
PolicyPopulous policy
No full privatization of KEPCO and KOGAS is insight.Strong opposition from labor union
Jung 4
Key Energy Indicators of Korea
The world’s 10th largest energy consumerLittle indigenous energy resources ⇒ dependence on overseas 97%
(Oil: the world 4th importer, LNG & Coal: 2nd )Put influence on global energy supply market and cargo prices
Unit 1980 1990 2002 1980-1990 1990-2002Real GDP (1995 Prices) Billion USD 149 342 680 8.7% 5.9%Population Million 38 43 48 1.2% 0.9%Total Primary Energy Demand Mtoe 41.4 92.7 203.5 8.4% 6.8%Oil Dependence Share in Total 65% 54% 50%Energy Intensity toe/million USD 278 271 299 -0.2% 0.8%Energy per capita toe/person 1.1 2.2 4.2 7.1% 5.8%
Annual Growth Rate
Source: APERC Analysis (2004), based on data from EDMC database, IEA (2004), “Energy Balances of OECD Countries” and World Bank (2004), “World Development Indicators”
Jung 5
Drivers for Energy Demand (1999-2020): Indexes of Macro Variables
Source: APERC Analysis (2004), based on data from DRI-WEFA (2001)
Strong growth for non-energy intensive industries and energy intensive industries
0.02.0
4.06.08.0
10.0
12.014.016.0
18.020.0
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
Inde
xes
(198
0=1)
Real GDPPopulationValue Added for Energy Intensive IndustriesValue Added for Non-Energy Intensive IndustriesValue Added for Services
Korean Air Effect
Jung 6
Industry Structure: Share of Value Added for Industries
10%
10% 10%
11%
9% 9%
14%
9% 8% 11%7% 6%
23%
21%14%
30%
27%
16%
32%
26%18%
41%
23% 20%
54%
66%73%
49%
62%
73%
48%
63%72%
47%
69% 73%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Kore a Japan USA Kor e a Japan USA Kore a Japan USA Kor e a Japan USA
Agriculture Energy Intens ive Industries Non-Energy Intens ive Industries Services
1980 1990 1999 2020
Source: APERC Analysis (2004), based on data from DRI-WEFA (2001)
Jung 7
Total Primary Energy Demand of Korea
Source: APERC (2002), “APEC Energy Demand and Supply Outlook”. EIA(2004), “International Energy Outlook”, and IEA(2002), “World Energy Outlook”
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
Mto
e
TPED (History) IEA Outlook EIA Outlook APERC Outlook
Outlook (1999 – 2020)
APERC EIA IEA1999-2010 4.0% 3.0% 3.6%2010-2020 2.8% 3.5% 2.3%
1971-1980: 10.4% p.a.
1980-1990: 8.4% p.a.
1990-1999: 7.6% p.a. Average Annual Growth Rate
Jung 8
Outlook of Total Primary Energy Demand
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Coal Oil GasM
toe
Power and heat generation Other
Industry Transport
Commercial Residential
Growth by Fuel Type and Sector
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1999 2005 2010 2015 2020
Mto
e
Coal Oil Gas Hydro Nuclear NRE
TPED by Fuel Type
Source: APERC (2002), “APEC Energy Demand and Supply Outlook”
Jung 9
Income and Energy Demand (1980-2020)
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000
GDP per capita (1990 US$)
toe per capita
Japan Korea Northeast Asia China Russia APEC USA
Russia
AverageNortheast Asia*
APECChina
Korea
Japan
1980
1999
2005
2010
20152020
1980
2020
1995
USA
2020
1980
Source: APERC (2002), “APEC Energy Demand and Supply Outlook”
Jung 10
Crude Import Dependences on the Middle East
44%
25% 29%20%
14%
30%16%
0%
21%
0%
37%
0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Korea China Japan USA
IndonesiaCanadaKuwaitRussiaLibiaUKMexicoNigeriaVenezuelaNorwayUAEIranSaudi Arabia
High reliance on the Middle East
Source: World Oil Trade, Blackwell Energy Research
Jung 11
Energy Price Trends: Natural Gas
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
January-00
March-00May-0
0July-00
September-00
November-0
0Jan
uary-01March-01
May-01
July-01
September-01
November-0
1Jan
uary-02March-02
May-02
July-02
September-02
November-0
2Jan
uary-03March-03
May-03
July-03
September-03
November-0
3Jan
uary-04
USD
/MM
BTU
Henry Hub, La. LNG Import Prices into EuropeLNG Import Price to Japan LNG Import Price to KoreaLNG Import Price to US
Source: APERC Analysis (2004), based on data from EDMC database
Jung 12
Korea’s Energy Seasonality
South Korea: LNG Seasonality
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun
Jul
Aug Sep Oct
Nov
Dec Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun
Jul
Aug Sep Oct
Nov
Dec Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun
Jul
Aug Sep Oct
Nov
Dec
1999 2000 2001
MM
tpa
-- an
nual
rate
TotalCity gasElectricity Generation
Source: David Nissen (2002), “Flexibility in LNG Trade”, A Paper Presented at APERC Annual Conference in 2002
Jung 13
Efforts to Improve Energy Efficiency
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
Ener
gy In
tens
ity (t
oe/to
n)
KoreaJapanUSAUKGermanyChina
China
KoreaJapan USA
Germany
UK
Inter-country comparison of energy intensity for iron and steel industry highlights Korea’s strong improvements in energy efficiency.
Source: APERC Analysis (2004), based on data from EDMC/IEEJ (2004) “EDMC database” and IEA (2004), “Energy Balances of OECD and Non-OECD Countries”
Jung 14
Nuclear Power Generation
Role of nuclear as to enhance energy securityIn 2002, Nuclear accounted for 15% of TPED, and 36% of total electricity generation output.
Onsite storage will be full by 2008
To secure new repository site,Government awaits for the application from local provinces
Bu-An prefecture is likely to apply for the new siteHowever …
Jung 15
Governor of Bu-An Prefecture
Jung 16
KEDO (Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization) ProjectObjective
KEDO was established in 1995 to implement the agreed framework between the United States and North Korea, under which North Korea will freeze and dismantle its existing nuclear program. In exchange, KEDO agrees to offer alternative energy sources:
Construction of 2 nuclear power units (1000MW*2, LWR) that follows international safety standardsSupply heavy fuel oil (500,000 ton) for heating and power plant
by the time the 1st nuclear unit starts operation
Participating CountriesExecutive members (EU, Japan, Korea and US) and 9 countries.
Current StatusDue to the North Korea’s violation to the agreed framework, KEDO
has been suspending;heavy fuel oil supply, andconstruction of nuclear power plant.
Jung 17
Regional Cooperation
Inter-governmental cooperationThe APEC Energy Working Group on “Energy Security
Initiative”
The ASEAN + 3 “Osaka Initiative” and “Manila Declaration”
Private sector cooperationKorea East and West Power Corp and Tohoku Electric Power
Corp. (Dec. 2002)
Cooperation on Coal Procurement
Korea Gas Corporation and Tohoku Electric Corp (May 2003)
Emergency Preparedness for LNG Supply Disruption
LNG tanker swap
Jung 18
Irkutsk
ChinaKorea Japan
Russia
Mongolia
Beijing●
●
●
Krasnoyarsk●
Yakutsk
●●
Yuzhno Sakhalinsk
●
●
Khabarovsk
Vladivostok
Shenyang●
Seoul
Shanghai●
Tarim
Plan for Gas Projects in NE Asia
Source: Korea Gas Corporation
Jung 19
1
6
5
3
2
4
MONGOLIA
RUSSIA
CHINA JAPANJAPAN
Sea of Japan
Sea of Okhotsk
SapporoSapporo
TokyoTokyo
Beijing
SeoulPyongyang
KoreaKoreaDPRKDPRK
East China SeaShanghai
Shenyang
ChangchunHarbin
Ulan Bator
Irkutsk Chita
Khabarovsk
Bratsk
Buryatia
Uchur
BureyaSakhalin
Island
Plan for Power Interconnection Projects in NE Asia
Source: Podkovalnikov (2002)
Jung 20
Summary of Korea’s Energy SituationConventional fuel will maintain dominant share.
Share by energy type (2020): Coal 20%, Oil 49%, Natural Gas: 12%, Nuclear: 15% and NRE 1%Robust energy demand growth is expected.
Transportation sector to lead oil demand, and power sector to lead coal and natural gas demand.Nuclear expansion – hurdles lying ahead
Government plans to install additional 9 units by 2015, but hurdles are lying ahead. → repository issue and difficulty for siting Kyoto Protocol
Ratified Kyoto Protocol in November 2002
Potential for regional cooperationStill lingering regional rivalry: “Nationalism”
Financing projects for North Korea
Jung 21
Implications for the U.S.US has and will have vital interests in energy markets for Korea and Northeast Asia.
Trade volume with Northeast Asia is on the rise.China, Japan and Korea are among the top 10 trading partners with US.
Russian Far East: West Coast ConnectorPotential for LNG and oil from Sakhalin II to USA
Exposure of US firms to Northeast Asia offers greater business opportunity.
Funding sources from US-lead private banks, export credit agencies, international lending institutions could be extended to projects in Northeast Asia.
US firms could generate value added in this growing market.
Jung 22
For your refreshment …
Source: Korean Air (2004)
Jung 23
Korea’s population growth is stabilized.
Source: Korean Air (2004)