south sudan - western bahr el ghazal south sudan ... and follow us @reach_info. wau jur river raga...

County Assessed settlements OCHA (COD) settlements Cover percentageJur River 56 809 7%

Raga 32 342 9%

Wau 66 342 19%

Total 154 1,493 10%

WAU

JURRIVER

RAGA

SUDAN

Assessed settlements

0%

Settlement

0.1 - 4.9%1

10.1 - 20%

20.1 - 50%

> 50%

Cover percentage of assessed settlements relative to the OCHA (COD) total dataset:

5 - 10%

1 Data from counties with under 5% settlement coverage are not included in county level analysis, but are included in state-level analysis.

Assessment coverage

Contact with Area of Knowledge

KIs reported having visited AoK within last month.

KIs reported being newly arrived IDPs.

51%

5%

Key Informants interviewed387Settlements assessed 154

KIs reported being in contact with someone living in AoK within last month.

42%

Since June 2016, Western Bahr el Ghazal has experienced multiple incidents of intense conflict in areas of Wau town, and the surrounding areas of Jur river, Wau and Raga counties. Many areas in Western Bahr el Ghazal are largely inaccessible to humanitarian actors due to insecurity and logistical constraints. As a result, only limited information is available on the humanitarian situation outside major displacement sites in Wau town.In order to fill such information gaps and facilitate humanitarian planning, in late 2015, REACH piloted its Area of Origin (AoO) methodology, which takes a territory-based approach that may cover several bomas, to collect data in hard-to-reach areas of Unity State.

In December 2016, REACH decided to refine the methodology, moving from the AoO to the Area of Knowledge (AoK) methodology, an approach collecting information at the settlement level. The most recent OCHA Common Operational Dataset (COD) released in February 2016 has been used as the reference for settlement names and locations. Through AoK, REACH collects data from a network of Key Informants (KIs) who have sector-specific knowledge and gain information from regular direct or indirect contact, or recent displacement. Using this new methodology, in April 2017, REACH has collected information on Western Bahr el Ghazal through KIs in Wau PoC site as well as Wau informal settlements.

Data collected is aggregated to the settlement level and all percentiles presented in this factsheet, unless otherwise specified, represent percent of settlements within Western Bahr el Ghazal with that specific response. The displacement section on page 2 refers to the proportion of assessed KIs arrived within the previous month (newly arrived IDPs).Although current AoK coverage is still limited and its findings not statistically significant, it provides an indicative understanding of the needs and current humanitarian situation in assessed areas of Western Bahr el Ghazal State.

Overview

Reached settlements

Assessment coverage

South Sudan - Western Bahr El GhazalAssessment of Hard-to-Reach Areas in South Sudan

South Sudan Displacement Crisis

November 2017

1

39+37+15+7+331+25+24+13+6

More women than men 39%About equal 37%More men than women 15%All/almost all women 7%All/almost all men 3%

About equal 31%More adults than children 25%More children than adults 24%All/almost all adults 13%All/almost all elderly 6%

54+31+8+857+36+7More women than men 57%

About equal 36%All/almost all women 7%

More children than adults 54%About equal 31%All/almost all adults 8%All/almost all elderly 8%

1 Access to health services 40%

2 Security 35%

3 Access to food 15%

1 Wau County 80%

2 Jur River County 10%

3 Raga County 10%

1 Lack of health services 40%

2 Insecurity 25%

3 Lack of food 25%

20% November 201780% October 201720+80+0+0+A

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

● ●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●● ●●

●

●●●●

●

●●● ●

● ●

●

●

●

●●●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

WAU

JUR RIVER

RAGA

0 - 25%26 - 50%51 - 75%76 - 100%

Insufficient data

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

● ●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●● ●●

●

●●●●

●

●●● ●

● ●

●

●

●

●●●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

WAU

JUR RIVER

RAGA

Percent of settlements reporting local community remaining:

0 - 25%26 - 50%51 - 75%76 - 100%

Insufficient data

Percent of settlements reporting presence of IDPs:

Reported gender ratio of local community remaining in assessed settlements:

Reported age ratio of local community remaining in assessed settlements:

Reported gender ratio of IDPs in assessed settlements:

Reported age ratio of IDPs in assessed settlements:

Primary reported reason newly arrived IDPs left their previous location:

Primary reported reason newly arrived IDPs came to their current location:

Most recent previous locations reported by newly arrived IDPs:

Departure from most recent previous location by newly arrived IDPs:

Demographic compositionDemographic composition

Push factors Pull factors Previous location Displacement

Local community Displacement

New arrivals



November 2017

2

1 Facilites destroyed by violence 39%

2 No health care workers in area 18%

3 Facilities are too far 18%71+29+0+A

Under 30 minutes 22%30 minutes to under 1 hour 42%1 hour to under half a day 36%

22+42+3636+16+9+9+8

3918

1 Malaria 36%

2 Malnutrition 16%

3 Breathing problems 9%

4 Typhoid 9%

5 Diarrhoea 8%

71% Not available29% Available18

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

● ●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●● ●●

●

●●●●

●

●●● ●

● ●

●

●

●

●●●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

WAU

JUR RIVER

RAGA

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

● ●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●● ●●

●

●●●●

●

●●● ●

● ●

●

●

●

●●●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

WAU

JUR RIVER

RAGA

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

● ●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●● ●●

●

●●●●

●

●●● ●

● ●

●

●

●

●●●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

WAU

JUR RIVER

RAGA

0 - 25%26 - 50%51 - 75%76 - 100%

Insufficient data

Percent of settlements reporting access to health care:

0 - 25%26 - 50%51 - 75%76 - 100%

Insufficient data

Percent of settlements reporting tukuls as a primary shelter type for local community:

0 - 25%26 - 50%51 - 75%76 - 100%

Insufficient data

Percent of settlements reporting tukuls as a primary shelter type for IDPs:

Primary reported heath concern in assessed settlements:

Reported availability of feeding programmes that provide Plumpy Sup, CSB++ or other nutrition supplements in assessed settlements:

Reported distance of nearest healthcare facilities from assessed settlements:

Primary reported reason why healthcare facilities are not available from assessed settlements:

Health concerns

Feeding programmes

Healthcare distance

Healthcare unavailability

68+32+0+A 68% No32% Yes

32+32+32+8+81 Plastic sheet 23%

2 Blanket 23%

3 Soap 23%

4 Mosquito net 8%

5 Cooking pot 8%

Primary reported non-food item needed to meet needs of IDPs in assessed settlements with IDPs present:

Reported destruction or partial destruction of shelters by violence in assessed settlements:

NFI Needs Shelter damage

Health Shelter/NFI



November 2017

3

7+9+10+25+48

All 7%More than half 9%Half 10%Less than half 25%None 48%

Under 30 minutes 39%30 minutes to under 1 hour 41%1 hour to under half a day 19%Half a day 2%

Under 30 minutes 37%30 minutes to under 1 hour 45%1 hour to under half a day 17%Half a day 1%

39+41+19+237+45+17+175+25+0+A

74% Available

26% Not available74+26+A

1 Crops destroyed by fighting 34%

2 Lack of rain reduced previous harvest 15%

3 Crops destroyed by pests 11%

3415111.3 coping strategies

reported on average

40+35+12+10+1

Borehole 40%Protected well 35%Donkey 12%Pond 10%Tap stand 1%

Reported primary water source available from assessed settlements:2

Water sources

Reported availability of a functional borehole from assessed settlements:

Water availability

61+39+A75%

Available25%

Not available

39% Not available

61% Available

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

● ●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●● ●●

●

●●●●

●

●●● ●

● ●

●

●

●

●●●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

WAU

JUR RIVER

RAGA

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

● ●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●● ●●

●

●●●●

●

●●● ●

● ●

●

●

●

●●●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

WAU

JUR RIVER

RAGA

0 - 25%26 - 50%51 - 75%76 - 100%

Insufficient data

Percent of settlements reporting adequate access to food:

0 - 25%26 - 50%51 - 75%76 - 100%

Insufficient data

Percent of settlements reporting presence of a functional borehole:

Reported use of sanitation facilities over open defecation in assessed settlements:

Reported distance of nearest water source from assessed settlements:2

Reported availability of a functioning market accessible from assessed settlements:

Primary reason settlements reported an inability to adequately access food:

Reported distance of nearest market from assessed settlements:

Reported availability of land for agriculture in assessed settlements:

Average number of reported coping strategies used in assessed settlements:

2 Safe or unsafe water source

SanitationMarket availabilityLand availabilityCoping strategies

Food unavailability

Water distanceMarket distance

Food Security WASH



November 2017

4

About REACHREACH facilitates development of information tools and products that enhance capacity of aid actors to make ev-idence-based decisions in emergency, recovery and development contexts. All REACH activities are conducted through inter-agency aid coordination mechanisms. For more information, you can write to our in-country office: [email protected] or to our global office: [email protected] www.reach-initiative.org and follow us @REACH_info.

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

● ●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●● ●●

●

●●●●

●

●●● ●

● ●

●

●

●

●●●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●●

●

●

●●●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

●

●●●●

●

●●

●

●

●

●

●●

●

●

WAU

JUR RIVER

RAGA

0 - 25%26 - 50%51 - 75%76 - 100%

Insufficient data

Percent of settlements reporting access to education:

Very Good 38%

Good 62%

73+27+0+A

1 Killing/injury by other community 35%

2 Looting 28%

3 Sexual violence 15%

4 Domestic violence 7%

5 Family separation 5%


2 Looting 28%

3 Forced recruitment 12%

4 Harassment to disclose information 3%

5 Cattle raiding 2%

1 Sexual violence 30%

2 Early marriage 19%


4 Looting 9%

5 Family separation 7%

73% No27% Yes

Primary reported protection concern in assessed settlements:



Reported relationships between IDPs, returnees4 and local community in assessed settlements:

Reported presence of disputes over land ownership in assessed settlements:

Women Men

Girls

Community relations

Land disputes


2 Looting 26%

3 Harassment to disclose information 11%

4 Forced recruitment 9%

5 Abduction 5%


Boys

None 45%Pre-primary 34%Primary 51%Secondary 7%ALP3 1%

45+34+51+7+11 Fees are too high 49%

2 Need to work outside home 24%

49240% None 2%

19% Less than half 37%

32% Half 40%

29% More than half 8%

20% All 14%

1 Fees are too high 55%

2 Need to work inside home 12%

55121 Security concerns 43%

2 Facilities destroyed by violence 25%

4325Reported proportion of settlements where 6-17 years old boys and girls attend school:

Reported available education services in assessed settlements:

Primary reported reason why boys are not attending school in assessed settlements:

Primary reported reason why girls are not attending school in assessed settlements:

Education availability

School attendance

Education attendance and availability

Primary reported reason why education services are not available in assessed settlements:

4 Local community displaced and returned home, reported in 49% of assessed settlements

3 Accelerated learning programmes.

Education Protection



November 2017

5

south sudan - western bahr el ghazal south sudan ... and follow us @reach_info. wau jur river raga...

Documents