spatial distributions of aerosol concentrations and

10
Spatial distributions of aerosol concentrations and depositions in Asia during the year 2010 SOON-UNG PARK Center for Atmospheric and Environmental Modeling 24 Digital-ro 27-gil Guro-gu, Seoul SOUTH KOREA [email protected] Abstract Aerosol Modeling System (AMS) that is consisted of the Asian Dust Aerosol Model2 (ADAM2) and the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system has been employed to document the spatial distributions of the annual averaged both the Asian dust (AD) aerosol and the anthropogenic aerosol (AA) concentrations and their total depositions in several chosen regions and the Asian region for the year 2010. It is found that the annual mean surface aerosol (PM 10 ) concentrations in the Asian region affect in a wide region as a complex mixture of AA and AD aerosols; they are predominated by the AD aerosol in the AD source region of northern China and Mongolia with a maximum annual mean concentration exceeding 300 μg m -3 ;AAs are predominated in the high pollutant emission regions of southern and eastern China and northern India with a maximum concentration exceeding 110 μg m -3 ; while the mixture of AA and AD aerosols is dominated in the downwind regions extending from the Yellow Sea to the Northwest Pacific Ocean. It is also found that the annual total deposition of aerosols in the model domain is found to be 485.2 Tg (371. 8 Tg by AD aerosol and 113.4 Tg by AA), of which 66 % (318.6 Tg) is contributed by the dry deposition (305.3 Tg by AD aerosol and 13.3 Tg by AA) and 34 % (166.6 Tg) by the wet deposition (66.3 Tg by AD aerosol and 100.1 Tg by AA), suggesting about 77 % of the annual total deposition being contributed by the AD aerosol mainly through the dry deposition process and 23 % of it by AA through the wet deposition process. Key-words: ADAM2, Aerosol Modeling System (AMS), Anthropogenic aerosol, Asian Dust aerosol, CMAQ, Concentration, Deposition 1. Introduction Atmospheric aerosols can affect the quality of our lives significantly because of its potential impacts on human health and the environment. The sub-micrometer size of aerosols can be inhaled and thus may pose certain health hazards [1-7], resulting in an increase in mortality[8-10] and in respiratory [11] and cardiovascular diseases [12- 13]. Because aerosols also scatter light, they strongly influence the radiative budget of the Earth-atmosphere system; they also reduce visibility and diminish the aesthetic scenery [14- 23]. Depositions of aerosols can affect significantly the terrestrial and marine eco- systems[24]. Asia is a major source of both natural aerosol (Asian dust) and anthropogenic aerosols over the Northern Hemisphere. Asian dust that is a typical example of mineral aerosol occurs in northern China and Mongolia more frequently during the spring season [25-30]. Anthropogenic aerosols that are mainly originated from human activities and the formation by gas to aerosol conversion of pollutants have an increasing trend due to the rapid economic expansion in many Asian countries [31- 34]. Therefore the atmospheric aerosols in this region are the complex mixture of various aerosols including Asian dust and anthropogenic aerosols (Secondary inorganic aerosol, Secondary organic aerosol, Black carbon, Organic carbon, Water droplet and emitted particulate matter) [35]. Recently [34] have developed the Aerosol Modeling System (AMS) that is composed of the Asian Dust Aerosol Model2 (ADAM2) for the Asian dust aerosol modeling and the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model for the anthropogenic aerosol modeling to predict high aerosol concentration events in Asia. This model has been used to simulate dense haze events occurred in May 2010 [36] and in January 2013 [37] in East Asia and found to simulate successfully these events. Impact assessments of aerosols on the health, environment, eco-systems and climate variation Advances in Environmental and Agricultural Science ISBN: 978-1-61804-270-5 204

Upload: others

Post on 17-Nov-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Spatial distributions of aerosol concentrations and

Spatial distributions of aerosol concentrations and depositions in Asia during the year 2010

SOON-UNG PARK

Center for Atmospheric and Environmental Modeling 24 Digital-ro 27-gil Guro-gu, Seoul

SOUTH KOREA [email protected]

Abstract

Aerosol Modeling System (AMS) that is consisted of the Asian Dust Aerosol Model2 (ADAM2) and the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system has been employed to document the spatial distributions of the annual averaged both the Asian dust (AD) aerosol and the anthropogenic aerosol (AA) concentrations and their total depositions in several chosen regions and the Asian region for the year 2010. It is found that the annual mean surface aerosol (PM10) concentrations in the Asian region affect in a wide region as a complex mixture of AA and AD aerosols; they are predominated by the AD aerosol in the AD source region of northern China and Mongolia with a maximum annual mean concentration exceeding 300 µg m-3;AAs are predominated in the high pollutant emission regions of southern and eastern China and northern India with a maximum concentration exceeding 110 µg m-3; while the mixture of AA and AD aerosols is dominated in the downwind regions extending from the Yellow Sea to the Northwest Pacific Ocean. It is also found that the annual total deposition of aerosols in the model domain is found to be 485.2 Tg (371. 8 Tg by AD aerosol and 113.4 Tg by AA), of which 66 % (318.6 Tg) is contributed by the dry deposition (305.3 Tg by AD aerosol and 13.3 Tg by AA) and 34 % (166.6 Tg) by the wet deposition (66.3 Tg by AD aerosol and 100.1 Tg by AA), suggesting about 77 % of the annual total deposition being contributed by the AD aerosol mainly through the dry deposition process and 23 % of it by AA through the wet deposition process.

Key-words: ADAM2, Aerosol Modeling System (AMS), Anthropogenic aerosol, Asian Dust aerosol, CMAQ, Concentration, Deposition 1. Introduction

Atmospheric aerosols can affect the quality of our lives significantly because of its potential impacts on human health and the environment. The sub-micrometer size of aerosols can be inhaled and thus may pose certain health hazards [1-7], resulting in an increase in mortality[8-10] and in respiratory [11] and cardiovascular diseases [12-13]. Because aerosols also scatter light, they strongly influence the radiative budget of the Earth-atmosphere system; they also reduce visibility and diminish the aesthetic scenery [14-23]. Depositions of aerosols can affect significantly the terrestrial and marine eco-systems[24].

Asia is a major source of both natural aerosol (Asian dust) and anthropogenic aerosols over the Northern Hemisphere. Asian dust that is a typical example of mineral aerosol occurs in northern China and Mongolia more frequently during the spring season [25-30]. Anthropogenic aerosols that are mainly originated from human activities and

the formation by gas to aerosol conversion of pollutants have an increasing trend due to the rapid economic expansion in many Asian countries [31-34]. Therefore the atmospheric aerosols in this region are the complex mixture of various aerosols including Asian dust and anthropogenic aerosols (Secondary inorganic aerosol, Secondary organic aerosol, Black carbon, Organic carbon, Water droplet and emitted particulate matter) [35].

Recently [34] have developed the Aerosol Modeling System (AMS) that is composed of the Asian Dust Aerosol Model2 (ADAM2) for the Asian dust aerosol modeling and the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model for the anthropogenic aerosol modeling to predict high aerosol concentration events in Asia. This model has been used to simulate dense haze events occurred in May 2010 [36] and in January 2013 [37] in East Asia and found to simulate successfully these events.

Impact assessments of aerosols on the health, environment, eco-systems and climate variation

Advances in Environmental and Agricultural Science

ISBN: 978-1-61804-270-5 204

Page 2: Spatial distributions of aerosol concentrations and

require temporal and spatial distributions of aerosols with chemical compositions for a long term. However, long-term statistical data of aerosols are not usually available. The present study will provide a year-long data set of aerosols to make it possible to assess the effects of aerosols on health and environment.

The purpose of this study is to examine the spatial distributions of Asian dust and anthropogenic aerosols including Secondary Inorganic aerosol (SIA), Black Carbon (BC), Organic Carbon (OC), Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and anthropogenic PM10 concentrations and their depositions simulated by the Aerosol Modeling System (AMS) in the Asian domain for the year 2010. 2. Model descriptions 2.1. Meteorological model

The meteorological model used in this study is the fifth generation meso-scale model of non-hydrostatic version (MM5; Pennsylvania State University / National Center for Atmospheric Research) defined in the x, y and σ coordinate [38-39]. The model domain (Fig. 1) has the horizontal resolution of 27 × 27 km2 with 30 vertical layers in the Asian region. The NCEP FNL operational global analysis data on a 1.0 × 1.0 degree grid are used for the initial and lateral boundary conditions for the model. 2.2. Aerosol Modeling System (AMS)

The Aerosol Modeling System (AMS) is consisted of the Asian Dust Aerosol Model2 (ADAM2;[40]) and the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) version 4.7.1 modeling system with emission data of pollutants (SO2, NOX, VOC, CO, NH3, BC, OC and PM10) in the model domain. 2.2.1. ADAM2

The ADAM2 model is an Eulerian dust transport model that includes the specification of the dust source regions delineated by the statistical analysis of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 3 hourly reporting dust data and statistically derived dust emission conditions in Sand, Gobi, Loess and Mixed surface soil in the model domain (Fig. 1). The model uses the suspended particle-size distribution parameterized by the several log-normal distributions in the source regions, based on the parent soil particle-size distributions with the used of the concept of the minimally and fully dispersed particle-size distribution [29, 41-43]. It

has 11-size of bins with near the same logarithm interval for particles of 0.15-35 µm in radius [28-29]. The model has a temporally varying emission reduction factors derived statistically using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in the different surface soil types in the Asian dust source region. The detailed description is given in [41].

Fig.1. The model domain and the geographical distribution of the Asian dust source region delineated by the surface soil types ( Gobi;

Sand; Loess; Mixed; Tibet). The enlarged South Korea map is shown with the indication of 28 PM10 monitoring sites.

2.2.2. CMAQ model

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system is a three-dimensional Eulerian atmospheric chemistry and transport modeling system that simulates airborne pollutants, ozone concentration, particulate matters, visibility, and acidic and nutrient pollutant species throughout the troposphere [44]. The aerosol component of the CMAQ model has the particle size distribution as the superposition of three lognormal sub-distributions, called modes. Fine particles with diameters less than 2.5 µm (PM2.5) are represented by two sub-distributions

Advances in Environmental and Agricultural Science

ISBN: 978-1-61804-270-5 205

Page 3: Spatial distributions of aerosol concentrations and

called the Aitken and accumulation modes. The Aitken mode includes particles with diameters up to approximately 0.1 µm for the mass distribution and the accumulation mode covers the mass distribution in the range from 0.1 to 2.5 µm. The coarse mode covers the mass distribution in the range from 2.5 to 10 µm. The model includes the processes of coagulation, particle growth by the addition of mass and new particle formation [45].

Fig.2. Spatial distributions of emission rate (t day-1 grid-1) of (a) SO2, (B) NOX, (c) NH3 and (d) PM10 on May 2006 in the Asian domain (1 grid: 27× 27 km2). 2.2.3. Emission data

Air pollutant emissions in Asia (Fig. 2) in the year 2006 are obtained from the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment-Phase B (INTEX-B) that includes all major anthropogenic sources [46]. More than 60% of the total Asian anthropogenic emissions are contributed by China.

Air pollutant emissions in South Korea in the year 2007 are obtained from the Clean Air Policy Supporting System (CAPSS, Korea Ministry of Environment) in a 3 ×3 km2 grid scheme (Fig. 3). These emission data over South Korea are re-gridded in a 27 ×27 km2 grid scheme for the simulation of aerosols in the model.

3. Results of the model simulation 3.1. Comparison of observed and simulated aerosol (PM10) concentration over South Korea

The Aerosol Modeling System (AMS) has been employed to simulate concentrations of PM10 for the whole year of 2010 in the Asian domain (Fig. 1).

Fig.3. Spatial distributions of emission rate (t day-1 grid-1) of (a) SO2, (B) NOX, (c) NH3 and (d) PM10 on May 2007 in the Korean domain (1 grid: 27× 27 km2).

Figure 4 shows the time series of the model simulated aerosol compositions of PM10 and the monitored PM10concentrations at 6 monitoring sites over Korea (Fig. 1) for the period of 8-16 January 2010. The model simulated PM10 includes all kinds of aerosols such as secondary inorganic aerosol (SIA; SO4

2-, NO3-, NH4

+), total carbon (BC, OC), Sea salt, together with secondary organic carbon (OTHER), emitted unspecified PM10, Asian dust and water droplet (WATER). The model simulates quite well the total PM10 concentration (sum of all aerosol species except for WATER) compared with the observation (red line). The high aerosol concentration occurred for the period from 12−14 January 2010 at all sites (Figs. 4a−f) is a mixture of anthropogenic aerosols including SIA (SO4

2-, NO3-, NH4

+), OC, BC and emitted PM10 and the natural aerosols such as Asian dust, Sea salt and water droplets. Among anthropogenic aerosols, the secondary inorganic aerosols (SIA) are predominated throughout the analysis period (Figs. 4a−f), suggesting the importance of pollutants emission of SO2, NO2 and NH3 that are precursors of SIA. It is worthwhile to note that the monitored aerosol concentration does not include water droplet so that the model simulated concentration without water droplet should be compared with the monitored aerosol concentration.

Advances in Environmental and Agricultural Science

ISBN: 978-1-61804-270-5 206

Page 4: Spatial distributions of aerosol concentrations and

Fig.4. Time series of hourly mean observed (red line) and modeled (shaded colors for various aerosols) PM10 concentration (µg m-3) at (a) Baengnyeongdo, (b) Heuksando, (c) Gosan, (d) Seoul, (e) Gunsan and (f) Gwangju in South Korea for the period of 09:00 LST 8 to 09:00 LST 16 January 2010. Model simulated concentrations of the water droplet (Water ), Sea salt and Secondary organic aerosol (OTHER ), Asian dust ( ), Secondary Inorganic Aerosol (SIA ), Black Carbon and Organic Carbon (BC and OC ), Anthropogenically emitted PM10 (Unspecified PM10 ) are indicated.

The model simulated hourly mean PM10

concentrations at 28 monitoring sites over South Korea (Fig. 1) are compared with their corresponding monitored ones and then averaged to get area averaged PM10 concentration over South Korea. These data are used to get the monthly averaged PM10 concentration over South Korea.

Figure 5 shows temporal variations of observed and simulated monthly mean PM10 concentrations with +/-one standard deviations over South Korea. The model simulates quite well the observed seasonal trend of the PM10 concentration. However it slightly overestimates PM10 concentration in winter and spring with a BIAS of 5.4 µg m-3 and a mean normalized BIAS of 12 % but it slightly underestimates PM10 concentration in summer with a BIAS of -4.5 µg m-3 and a mean normalized BIAS of -14%. Consequently, the modeled annual mean PM10 concentration averaged over South Korea (39.7 µg m-3) is almost the same as that of the monitored one (39.3 µg m-3), suggesting the potential usefulness of the present model for the study of temporal distributions of aerosols in Asia. The standard deviations of both the modeled and monitored monthly mean PM10 concentrations are larger than their corresponding monthly mean

PM10 concentrations in March and November, which is consistent with the observed very high dust concentration exceeding 2,500 µg m-3 in March and 1,600 µg m-3 in November at the most of monitoring sites (Fig. 1) in South Korea.

Fig.5. Temporal variations of the observed ( ) and modeled ( ) monthly mean PM10 concentrations (µg m-3) with the indication of +/- one standard deviation (vertical line) averaged over South Korea with the use of hourly monitored and simulated data at 28 monitoring sites. 3.2. Spatial distributions of annual mean PM10 concentrations

Figure 6 shows the model simulated surface mean aerosol concentration (PM10) averaged for the whole year of 2010. The Asian dust (AD) aerosol (Fig. 6a) originated in the AD source region (Fig. 1) affects far downwind region of the Northwestern Pacific Ocean. The annual mean AD aerosol concentration exceeding 10 µg m-3 covers over eastern China, the north of the Tibetan Plateau, the most parts of Mongolia, Korea peninsula, the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea with a maximum concentration of more than 300 µg m-3 at the northeastern Taklimakan desert. On the other hand the annual mean surface anthropogenic aerosol (AA) concentrations (Fig.6b) including SIA, OC, BC SOA and emitted PM10 that are originated from pollutants emissions affect almost all over the Asian region. The annual mean AA concentration exceeding 10 µg m-3 covers all over the eastern and southern parts of China, Korean peninsula and northern India where pollutants emissions are large (Fig. 2), with a maximum concentration exceeding 110 µg m-3 in Beijing.

Therefore, the annual mean surface total aerosol concentration (AD + AA) affects all Asian regions (Fig. 6c). The annual mean high surface aerosol concentration exceeding 50µg m-3 extends

Advances in Environmental and Agricultural Science

ISBN: 978-1-61804-270-5 207

Page 5: Spatial distributions of aerosol concentrations and

eastward from the Taklimakan desert region to northeast China with the maximum concentration of more than 304 µg m-3 at the eastern part of the Taklimakan desert area. This is mainly contributed by the AD aerosol (Fig. 7a). Another annual mean high aerosol concentrations exceeding 50µg m-3 occur in the most parts of eastern China and northern India in the high pollutant emission region (Fig 2) with a maximum concentration of more than 160 µg m-3 near Beijing. These are mainly contributed by AAs.

Fig.6. Spatial distributions of annual mean surface PM10concentration (µgm-3) of (a) Asian dust aerosol, (b) anthropogenic aerosols (SIA, SOA, BC, OC, anthropogenic PM10) and (c) total aerosol for the year 2010. Numbers indicate the local maximum values. 3.3. Spatial distributions of annual total depositions of AD and AA

Figure 7 shows the spatial distributions of annual total depositions of the AD aerosol for 2010. The spatial distribution pattern of the annual total deposition (dry + wet) (Fig. 7a) just follows that of the annual mean surface AD concentration (Fig. 6a). The zone of the maximum deposition extends downwind ward from the AD source region (Fig. 1) to the northwest Pacific Ocean with the maximum annual total deposition of more than 703 t km-2 at the northeastern Taklimakan desert. The total deposition of AD aerosol over AD source region and the land region is mainly contributed by the dry deposition process (Fig. 7b) whereas over the ocean the wet deposition (Fig 7c) is largely contributed to the total deposition. The annual total deposition of AD aerosol originated from the AD source region exceeds 10t km-2 over the

northwestern Pacific Ocean that may affect marine ecology in this region. The annual total dust deposition in the model domain is about 371.8Tg (305.3 Tg by dry deposition and 66.5 Tg by wet deposition) which is slightly lower than that estimated by [47] in 2007 (821.0 Tg) but slightly higher than that estimated by IPCC (241.0 Tg), suggesting a high variability dust occurrence frequency in each year.

Fig.7. Spatial distributions of annual (a) total deposition (Dry + Wet, t km-2), (b) dry deposition (t km-2) and (c) wet deposition (t km-2) of the Asian dust aerosol in 2010. Annual total values in the model domain (Tg) are indicated.

Figure 8shows the spatial distribution of the

annual total AA deposition. The spatial distribution pattern of the total deposition (wet + dry) of AA (Fig. 8a) is quite similar to that of the annual mean concentration of AA (Fig. 6b) with the maximum deposition of 45.0 t km-2 in the Sichuan province. Most of the annual total deposition of AA is mainly contributed by the wet deposition (Fig. 8c) rather than the dry deposition (Fig. 8b). The dry deposition of AA is one order magnitude smaller than that of the wet deposition. The annual total deposition of AA in the whole model domain is about 113.4 Tg, which is one-third of AD aerosol, of which 88 % (100.1 Tg) is contributed by wet deposition mainly in the high pollutants emission region (Figs. 2 and 8c) and the rest of 12 % (13.3 Tg) is contributed by the dry deposition (Fig. 8b).

Figure 9 shows annual total aerosol deposition (AD + AA) of all kinds of aerosols in the Asian domain. High aerosol deposition of more than 300 t km-2 yr-1 (Fig. 9a) occurs in northern China and

305.3 Tg

66.5Tg

371.8Tg

Advances in Environmental and Agricultural Science

ISBN: 978-1-61804-270-5 208

Page 6: Spatial distributions of aerosol concentrations and

Mongolia mainly due to AD. The annual total aerosol deposition in the whole model domain is 485.2 Tg, of which 77 % (371.8 Tg) is contributed by the AD aerosol and 23 % (113.4 Tg) is contributed by AA. This total deposition is largely contributed by dry deposition (66 %; 3 % by AA and 63 % by AD aerosol) in the AD source region (Fig. 7b).

It is quite clear that the dry deposition process is more effective for AD aerosol to remove the aerosol from the atmosphere while the wet deposition process is more effective for AA. This may be attributed to the difference of the particle-size distributions between AD and AA. The former is relatively larger than the latter. High aerosol deposition over southern and eastern China, over the Yellow Sea, the East Sea of Korea, the South China Sea and the eastern part of Japan are largely contributed by AAs that are mainly contributed by the wet deposition (Fig. 8c).

Fig.8. The same as in Fig. 7 but for the

anthropogenic aerosol

Fig.9. The same as in Fig. 7 but for the total

aerosol (Asian dust + anthropogenic aerosol). 3.4. Regional variations of PM10 concentrations in Asia

AMS is found to simulate quite reasonably the monitored aerosol concentrations in Korea (Figs. 4 and 5) so that the model simulated results can be used to document the spatial and temporal distributions of concentrations and depositions of the AD aerosol and AA in the whole Asian domain.

Fig.10. Regions that are estimated surface aerosol (AA and AD) concentration and total aerosol deposition. R1 represents the AD source region, R2 and R3 the high air pollutant emission region in China including Beijing and Shanghai, respectively, R4 South Korea, R5 the East Sea and R6 the Northwest Pacific Ocean. The topographical height is indicated by color.

To understand regional variations of aerosol

concentration and deposition, six regions (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5 and R6) are chosen (Fig. 10). The region R1 is located in AD source region including parts of northwestern Gansu, northeastern Xinjang, southwestern Mongol and western tip of Inner Mongolia, the region R2 in the high air pollutant emission region including Beijing, the region R3 including Shanghai, the region R4 over South Korea, the region R5 over the East Sea and the region R6 over the Northwest Pacific Ocean. R2 and R3 are located in the high pollutant emission regions in China whereas R4,5 and 6 are located in the downwind region of AD source and high pollutant emission regions.

The annual mean aerosol concentration in each region is given in Fig. 11. The annual mean aerosol concentration on AD source region of R1 is 98.5 µg m-3, of which almost all of it is contributed by AD aerosol. The annual mean AD (AD+AA) aerosol concentration tends to reduce away from

Advances in Environmental and Agricultural Science

ISBN: 978-1-61804-270-5 209

Page 7: Spatial distributions of aerosol concentrations and

the source region to be 48 (112) in R2, 24(74) in R3, 17.7(35) in R4, 9.1(17) in R5 and 3.6(6.5) µg m-3in R6. However, in the high pollutant emission regions of R2 and R3 the contribution of AA is greater than that of AD, so that the annual mean aerosol concentration in R2 is higher than that in R1. In the further downwind regions of R4, R5 and R6, the contribution of AA to the annual mean aerosol concentration is almost the same as that of AD, suggesting the importance of the mixture of AA and AD aerosols.

Fig.11. Annual mean total PM10 concentration (µgm-3; AA for anthropogenic aerosol, AD for Asian dust aerosol) in each region (R1-R6).

3.5. Regional variations of aerosol depositions

Figure 12 shows the annual total aerosol deposition of AA and AD aerosols in each region.

Fig.12. Annual total depositions (t km-2; dry and wet) of AA (left column), AD (middle column) and the sum of AA and AD (TOT; right column) in each region (R1-R6).

The annual total maximum deposition of more

than 115 t km-2 occurs in R1 (AD source region) that is mainly contributed by the AD aerosol through the dry deposition process. Away from the AD source region the annual total aerosol

deposition decreases from 41 t km-2 in R2to 6 t km-

2 in R6 over the northwestern Pacific Ocean. Even though the AA deposition is large (> 9 t km-2) especially in R2 and R3 where the air pollutants emissions are large (Fig. 2),the contribution of the AD aerosol to the annual total aerosol deposition is larger than that of AA except in R3 where both contributions are almost the same. It is worthwhile to note that the AA deposition is mainly contributed by the wet deposition process whereas the AD aerosol deposition is largely caused by the dry deposition process.

4. Conclusions

Aerosol Modeling System (AMS) that is consisted of the Asian Dust Aerosol model2 (ADAM2) for the Asian dust (AD) aerosol modeling and the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system for the anthropogenic aerosol (AA) modeling has been employed to document a year-long spatial distributions of the AD aerosol and the AAs in the Asian domain. The spatial distributions of annual mean surface concentrations, annual total dry and wet depositions of both the AD aerosol and AA have been documented for the first time in the whole Asian domain.

AMS is found to simulate quite reasonably the monitored aerosol concentrations in Korea so that the model simulated results can be used to document the spatial and temporal distributions of concentrations and depositions of the AD aerosol and the AA in the whole Asian domain.

It is found that the annual mean surface concentration of the AD aerosol exceeding 10 µg m-3 extends eastward from northwestern China in the Asian dust source region of the Takhlimakan desert to the Northwest Pacific Ocean with maximum concentration of more than 300 µg m-3 at the northeastern part of the Takhlimakan desert. Whereas that of AA exceeding 10 µg m-3 covers over the eastern and southern parts of China, northern India and the Korean peninsula with the maximum concentration of 110 µg m-3 over the Shandong province where the pollutants emissions are high.

Consequently the annual mean surface total aerosol (AD + AA) concentration exceeding 10 µg m-3 extends further downwind region from northwestern China to the Northwest Pacific Ocean. Another annual mean high aerosol concentration occurs in northern India and over the Bay of Bengal caused by AA.

Advances in Environmental and Agricultural Science

ISBN: 978-1-61804-270-5 210

Page 8: Spatial distributions of aerosol concentrations and

It is found that the annual total deposition of the AD aerosol in the whole Asian domain (model domain) is about 371.8 Tg, of which 82 % (305.3 Tg) is contributed by the dry deposition mainly in the Asian dust source region and 18 % (66.5 Tg) is contributed by the wet deposition mainly over oceans, whereas the annual total deposition of AA in the whole model domain is 113.4 Tg, of which 88 % (100.1 Tg) is contributed by the wet deposition largely over the high pollutant emission regions. Consequently, the annual total aerosol deposition in the Asian domain is found to be 485.2 Tg (371. 8 Tg by the AD aerosol and 113.4 Tg by AA), of which 318.6 Tg (66 %) is found to be contributed by the dry deposition (305.3 Tg by the AD aerosol and 13.3 Tg by AA) and 166.6 Tg (34 %) by the wet deposition (100.1 Tg by AA and 66.3 Tg by Asian dust aerosol). This suggests that the total aerosol deposition (the AD aerosol and AA) can affect significantly both the terrestrial and marine eco-systems in the Asian region.

The regional variations of annual mean aerosol concentration (PM10) in several regions including the Asian dust source region (R1), high pollutant emission regions in china (R2 and R3) and the downwind regions of South Korea (R4), the East Sea of Korea (R5) and the Northwestern Pacific Ocean (R6) clearly indicate that most of aerosols in R1 are found to be composed of the AD aerosol.

In the high anthropogenic air pollutant emission region in China of R2 and R3 the aerosols are found to be composed a mixture of AA and the AD aerosols.

In the further downwind regions of R4, R5 and R6, annual mean total aerosol concentration is found to decreases away from the sources of AD and AA from the maximum of 35.1µg m-3 in R4 to 6.5µg m-3 in R6.

The annual total aerosol deposition is found to decrease away from the AD source region (R1); from 116.4 t km-2(100% AD) in R1 (AD source region), 41.2 t km-2 (78 % AD and 12 % AA) in R2 (Beijing), 20.3t km-2 (48 % AD and 52 % AA) in R3 (Shanghai), 16.1 t km-2 (67 % AD and 33 % AA) in R4 (South Korea), 12.0 t km-2 (61 % AD and 39 % AA) in R5 (East Sea), to 6.1 t km-2 (61 % AD and 39 % AA) in R6 (Northwest Pacific Ocean). The large portion of deposition of the AD aerosol is found to be contributed by the dry deposition process while that of AA is by the wet deposition process.

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by Korea Meteorological Administration through the research project of the development of the aerosol prediction model. References [1] Bates DV, BR Fish, Hatch TF, Mercer TT, and

Morrow PE. Deposition and retention models for internal dosimetry of the human respiratory trac. Health Phys. 1966, 12: 173–207.

[2] Pope CA, Dockery DW, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, Ferris BG and Speizer FE. An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. New Engl. J. Med. 1993,329: 1753–1759.

[3] Dockery DW, Schwartz J and Spengler JD. Air Pollution and Daily Mortality: Associations with Particulates and Acid Aerosols. Environ. Res. 1992, 59: 362-373.

[4] Binkowski FS and Shankar U. The regional particulate matter model, 1.Model description and preliminary results. J. Geophys. Res. 1995, 100(D12): 26191-26209.

[5] Balásházy I, Hofmann W, and Heistracher T. Local particle deposition pattern may play a key role in the development of lung cancer. J. Appl. Physiol. Vol.94, 2003, pp.1719-1725.

[6] Yadav AK, Kumar K, Kasim A, Sing MP, Parida SK, Sharan M. Visibility and incidence of respiratory diseases during the 1998 haze episode in Brunei Darussala. J.Air Waste Ma. 2003,53: 946-956.

[7] Davis ME, Laden F, Hart JE, Gashick E, Smith TJ. Economic activity and trends in ambient air pollution. Environ. Health Persp.2010, 118: 614-619.

[8] Perez L, Tobias A, Querol X, Künzli N, Pey J, Alastuey A. Coarse particles from Saharan dust and daily mortality. Epidemiology 2008, 19: 800–807.

[9] Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., and Donahue, N. M., et al. Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere, Science, vol.326, doi:10.1126/science.1180353, 2009, pp.1525–1529

[10] SajaniZauli S, Miglio R, Bonasoni P, Cristofanelli P, Marinoni A, Sartini C, Goldoni CA,

Advances in Environmental and Agricultural Science

ISBN: 978-1-61804-270-5 211

Page 9: Spatial distributions of aerosol concentrations and

De Girolamo G, Lauriola P. Saharan dust and daily mortality in Emilia-Romagna (Italy). Occup Environ Med 2010, 68: 446–451.

[11] Cowie G, Lawson W and Kim N. Australian dust causing respiratory disease admissions in some North Island, New Zealand Hospitals. New Zeal. Med. J. 2010, 123(1311): 87.

[12] Chan CC, Chuang KJ, Chen WJ, Chang WT, Lee CT, Peng CM. Increasing cardiopulmonary emergency visits by long-range transported Asian dust storms in Taiwan. Environ Res. 2008, 106(3): 393–400.

[13] Middleton N, Yiallouros P, Kleanthous S, Kolokotroni O, Schwartz J, Dockery DW, Demokritou P and Koutrakis P. 2008. A 10-year time-series analysis of respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity in Nicosia, Cyprus: the effect of short-term changes in air pollution and dust storms. Environ Health 2008, 7:39; doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-7-39.

[14] IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Climate Change 1995, The science of Climate change. Cambridge University Press.1996, 573.

[15] Jacobson MZ. Strong radiative heating due to the mixing state of black carbon in atmospheric aerosols. Nature, 2001, 409(6821):695-697.

[16] Lee YL and Sequeira R. Visibility degradation across Hong Kong: its components and their relative contributions. Atmos. Environ. 2001, 34: 561-5872.

[17] Kaufman, YJ, Martins JV, Remer LA, Schoeberl MR, Yamasoe MA. Satellite retrieval of aerosol absorption over the oceans using sunglint.GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS. 2002, 29:19:1928.

[18] Watson JG. Visibility: Science and regulation. J. Air Waste Ma. 2002, 52: 628–713.

[19] Crutzen P. New directions: the growing urban heat and pollution island effect - impact on chemistry and climate. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38: 3539-3540.

[20] Chang L-S and Park S-U Direct radiative forcing due to anthropogenic aerosols in East Asia during April 2001. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38:

4467-4482.

[21] Penner JEP, Dong X and ChenY. Observational evidence of change in radiative forcing due to the indirect aerosol effect. Nature 2004, 427(6971): 231-234.

[22] Park S-U, Chang L-S, Lee E-H. Direct radiative forcing dur to aerosols in East Asia during a Hwangsa (Asian dust) event observed in 18-23 March 202 in Korea. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39: 2593-2606.

[23] Jung J, Lee H, Kim YJ, Liu X, Zhang Y, Gu J, Fan S. Aerosol chemistry and the effect of aerosol water content on visibility impairment and radiative forcing in Guangzhou during the 2006 Pearl River Delta campaign. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90: 3231-3244.

[24] Baker AR, Croot PL. Atmospheric and marine controls on aerosol iron solubility in seawater. Marine Chemistry Vol.120, 2010, pp.4-13.

[25] Gao QX, Li LJ, Zhang YG, Hu M. Studies on the springtime dust storm of China. China Environmental Science. 2000, 20(6): 495-500.

[26] Husar RB, Tratt D M, Schichtel BA, Falke SR, Li F, Jaffe D, Gassó S, Gill T, Laulainen NS, Lu F, Reheis MC, Chun Y, Westphal D, Holben BN, Gueymard C, McKendry I, Kuring N, Feldman GC, McClain C, Frouin RJ, Merrill J, DuBois D, Vignola F, Murayama T, Nickovic S, Wilson WE, Sassen K, Sugimoto N, Malm WC. Asian dust events of April 1998. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2001, 106(D16): 18317–18330.

[27] In H-J and Park S-U. The soil particle size dependent emission parameterization for an Asian dust (Yellow Sand observed in Korea on April 2002. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 37: 4625-2636.

[28] Park S-U and In H-J. Parameterization of dust emission for the simulation of the yellow sand (Asian dust) observed in March 2002 in Korea. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108(D19):4618.

[29] Park S-U and Lee E-H. Parameterization of Asian dust (Hwangsa) particle-size distributions for use in dust emission model. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38: 2155-2162.

[30] Yu X, Zhu B, Yin Y, Yang J, Li Y and Bu X. A comparative analysis of aerosol properties in dust

Advances in Environmental and Agricultural Science

ISBN: 978-1-61804-270-5 212

Page 10: Spatial distributions of aerosol concentrations and

and haze-fog days in a Chinese urban region. Atmos. Res. 2011, 99: 241-247.

[31] Chun Y and Lim JY. The recent characteristics of Asian dust and haze event in Seoul, Korea. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 2004, 87:143-152.

[32] Lee KH, Kim YJ and Kim MJ. Characteristics of aerosol observed during two severe haze events over Korea in June and October 2004. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40: 5146–5155.

[33] Kim KW, Kim YJ, Bang SY. Summer time haze characteristics of the urban atmosphere of Gwangju and the rural atmosphere of Anmyon. Korea. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 141: 189-199.

[34] Park S-U, Cho JH, and Park M-S. A simulation of Aerosols in Asia with the use of ADAM2 and CMAQ. Advances in Fluid Mechanics and Heat & Mass Transfer. 2012, 258-263.

[35] Park S-U. The aerosol modeling system for the simulations of high aerosol concentration events in East Asia. Recent Advances in Environmental Science, P3 (plenary lecture in WSEAS). 2013.

[36] Park S-U, Cho JH, and Park M-S. Identification of visibility reducing weather phenomena due to aerosols. Environmental Management and Sustainable Development. 2013a, 2:126-142.

[37] Park S-U, Cho JH, and Park M-S. A simulation of haze and mist events observed in east Asia during 19-22 May 2010 using the Aerosol Modeling System (AMS). Recent Advances in Environmental Science. 2013b, 204-210(WSEAS).

[38] Grell GA, Dudhia J and Stauffer DR. A description of 5th generation Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5).NCAR TECH. 1994, Note NCAR/TN-398.

[39] Dudhia J, Grill D., Guo Y-R, Hausen D, Manning K and Wang W. PSU/NCAR mesoscale modeling system tutorial class notes (MM5 modeling system version 2). 1998.

[40] Park S-U, Choe A, Lee E-H, Park M-S and Song X. The Asian dust aerosol model 2 (ADAM2) with the use of normalized difference vegetation data (NDVI) obtained from the spot4/vegetation data. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2010a, 101: 191-208.

[41] Lu H, Shao Y. A new model for dust emission by saltation bombardment.Journal of Geophysical Research.1999, 104: 16827–16842.

[42] Gomes L, Bergametti G, Dulac F., Ezat U. Assessing the actual size distribution of atmospheric aerosols collected with a cascade impactor. Journal of Aerosol Science 1990, 21: 47–59.

[43] Shao Y, Jung E, Leslie LM. Numerical prediction of northeast Asian dust storms using an integrated wind erosion modeling system.Journal of Geophysic. 2002, 107(D24): 4814

[44] University of North Carolina, Operational Guidance for the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System. Community Modeling and Analysis System Institute for the Environment 2010.

[45] Binkowski FS and Roselle SJ. Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component 1.Model description. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108(D6):4183.

[46] Zhang Q, Streets DG, Carmichael GR, He KB, Huo H, Kannari A, Klimont Z, Park IS, Reddy S, Fu JS, Chen D, Duan L, Lei Y, Wang LT, Yao ZL. Asian emissions in 2006 for the NASA INTEX-B mission. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2009, 9: 5131–5153.

[47] Park, S.-U., Choe, A., Park, M.-S. Estimates of Asian dust deposition over the Asian region by using ADAM2 in 2007. Science of the Total Environment 2010b, 408: 2347-2356.

Advances in Environmental and Agricultural Science

ISBN: 978-1-61804-270-5 213