spine medicine & surgery · 2019-04-12 · non-spinal mis procedures references 1. singer,...
TRANSCRIPT
Robotics
Neil Badlani MD, MBAThe Orthopedic Sports Clinic
Nobilis Health Corp.Houston, TX
The Orthopedic Sports Clinic
Disclosure
• Consulting/Speaking
– Medtronic
– Amendia
– Nutech
– Mazor *
– MIS Device
Outline
• Background/Applications
• Advantages/Disadvantages
• Robotic technique
• Clinical evidence
• Cases
My Experience
• 3 years
• 100+ cases
• Initial Motivation
– Less radiation
– Optimize comfort with anatomy and screw placement
• Started with larger cases and open cases
• Now I use it for every instrumented case
The Robot fits naturally into MISS
Surgical methods devised to achieve objectives of traditional surgery with minimized damage to peripheral tissues.
Mazor Robotics Renaissance
• Only FDA-approved robotic guidance system for spinal surgery
• Tens of thousands of screws placed • Available about 55 sites in the US, 95 internationally• The next step in the evolution of spine surgery
7www.MazorRobotics.com
CT-based
3D Planning Software
• CT-based 3D planning
• Guided instrumentation
• 1 mm accuracy
RBT UnitWorkstation
System components:
Computer Navigation- Intraop Robot
Renaissance Applications Spine Surgery
Posterior Surgical Approaches:
• Open
• MIS
• Percutaneous
Thoracic, Lumbar, Sacrum:
Spinal Fixation
Pedicle screws
Transfacet, translaminar-facet screws
Sacroiliac screws
SI fusion
Spinal Deformities
Scoliosis PSF, osteotomies
Cement Augmentations
Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty
Oncological Applications
Biopsies, Tumor resections
Revisions
Advantages• Surgeon
– Less Radiation!! (34s vs 77s per screw)– Increased confidence, improved accuracy– Decreased time per screw– Marketing
• Patient/Clinical– Increased precision, accuracy, safety– Some studies show 10% misplaced screws, 1-2%
nerve injury
• Hospital– Increased volume, marketing
References
1. Kantelhardt et al. Eur Spine J 20102. Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine. 2007;32(3):E111-20.3. Gertzbein SB, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine. 1990;15(1): 11-4.
Radiation Risks
• Ortho Hospital in Italy,
1976-2000
• Ortho – 29%
incidence
• Ortho Surgeons 5x
increased cancer risk
• In Vitro study
• Open bilateral pedscrews T11-S1 on 6 cadavers
• 10-12 X greater than non-spinal MIS procedures
References1. Singer, Occupational radiation exposure to the surgeon, Am Acad Ortho Surg. 2005;13:69-76.2. Mastrangelo G, Fedeli U, Fadda E, Giovanazzi A, Scoizzato L, Saia B. Increased cancer risk
among surgeons in an orthopaedic hospital. Occup Med. 2005;55(6):498-500.
Disadvantages
• Surgeon– Learning Curve- Minimal
• First 30 cases-> more conversion
to manual but equal accuracy
– Setup Time- Minimal
• Patient/Clinical– Difficult to prove true clinical benefit
• Hospital• COST!- Capital cost 750K
• No increase in revenue per case
References
1. Hu, Lieberman CORR 2013
How it works: step 1
1414
Step 1:
Preoperative
Plan
Step 4:
Operate
Step 2:
Mount
Step 3:
3D Sync
A CT using the Mazor protocol is obtained pre-op.
Plan screw placement to fit anatomy.
Pre-op planning• Time spent and the exercise is beneficial for
every case
• Increases understanding of variability in anatomy
• Notice asymptomatic misplaced screws in revisions
• Intra-Operative plan differs
between open, MIS, revisions.
How it works: step 2
16
16
Step 1:
Preoperative
plan
Step 4:
Operate
Step 2:
Mount
Step 3:
3D Sync
Multiple mounting options fit your intraoperative needs.
Mounting
PSIS and spinous process pins placed
Robot bridge attached to pins
Mounting
PSIS and spinous process pins placed
Mounting
Robot bridge attached to pins
HOW IT WORKS – STEP 3
2020
Step 4:
Operate
Step 2:
Mount
Step 3:
3D Sync
-Two fluoroscopy images taken intraop-Synchronized with the CT-based surgical blueprint (independent of anatomy). -Registers each vertebral body independently for unparalleled accuracy.
Step 1:
Preoperative
plan
Registration
AP and Oblique xrays taken with registration markers
Registration
AP and Oblique xrays taken with registration markers
How it works: step 4
2323
Step 4:
Operate
Step 2:
Mount
Step 3:
3D Sync
Step 1:
Preoperative
plan
Operate
Operate
Operate
Clinical Evidence Mazor Robotics
98.3% Accuracy of 3,271 implants in 635 cases in 14 medical centers
with 49% of implants placed percutaneously
(typically 10%-20% of spine surgeries are MIS)
Devito DP, Kaplan L, Dietl R, et al. Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with SpineAssist surgical robot: retrospective study. Spine J. 2010;35(24):2109-2115.
28www.MazorRobotics.com
Clinical Evidence Mazor Robotics
Compared to freehand surgery, in 112 cases Mazor Robotics-guided surgery significantly:
• Screw Accuracy
94.5% Mazor vs 91.4% Conventional (p<0.05)
• Reduced X-ray dosage by 56%
• Reduced complication rates and LOS
• OR time equivalent
Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, Burger R, GieseA, Rohde V. Perioperative course and accuracy of screwpositioning in conventional, open robotic-guided andpercutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement.Eur Spine J. 2011;20(6):860-868.
Clinical Evidence Mazor Robotics
99.7% Clinical Acceptance of 1,815 implants in 120 scoliotic adolescentsDevito DP, Gaskill T, Erikson M, Fernandez M. Robotic based guidance for pedicle screw instrumentation of the scoliotic spine. Presented at Pediatric Society of North America (POSNA); May 2011; Montreal, Canada.
Clinical Evidence Mazor Robotics
98.9% “successful and accurate” screw placement in 960 screws in 95 patients (deformity and revision surgeries)
Hu, X, Ohnmeiss D. Lieberman,I. Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement: lessons learned from the first 102 patients. Eur Spine J (2013) 22:661-666.
CasesL4-S1 open posterior with high grade spondylolisthesis
CasesL5-S1 percutaneous posterior after ALIF
CasesMulti-level percutaneous instrumentation after LLIF
Why Robotic Spinal Surgery?
• Less radiation
• Safety is improved
• Better outcomes with MIS
• Allows safer treatment of complex deformity
• No additional cost to the patient
Thank You