spring 2015 course evaluation - results · spring 2015 course evaluation - results section: b class...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B
Class Number: 2588
Dept. of Academic Success
SL-UY 1020: ACADEMIC SKILLS SEMINAR
Response Rate: 1/8
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 1
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 1
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 1
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 1
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 1
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 1
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 1.0 1
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 1
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 1.0 1
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A
Class Number: 1138
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-GY 5553: Physics of Quantum Computing
Primary Instructor: Tsifrinovich,Vladimir Response Rate: 16/18
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 6.3% 93.8% 16
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 15
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 87.5% 4.9 12.5% 16
Q10 The Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 16
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 16
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 68.8% 4.7 31.3% 16
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 62.5% 6.3% 18.8% 4.3 12.5% 16
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 56.3% 4.6 43.8% 16
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 68.8% 6.3% 4.6 25.0% 16
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 93.8% 4.9 6.3% 16
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 81.3% 6.3% 4.8 12.5% 16
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A
Class Number: 1139
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-GY 5663: Physics of Alternative Energy
Primary Instructor: Wolf,Edward Response Rate: 17/19
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 17
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 5.9% 94.1% 17
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 64.7% 4.6 35.3% 17
Q10 The Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 70.6% 5.9% 5.9% 4.7 17.6% 17
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 76.5% 5.9% 4.8 17.6% 17
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 76.5% 5.9% 4.8 17.6% 17
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 47.1% 11.8% 4.2 41.2% 17
Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 5.9% 52.9% 5.9% 4.2 35.3% 17
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 29.4% 11.8% 5.9% 4.0 52.9% 17
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 70.6% 5.9% 4.6 23.5% 17
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 76.5% 5.9% 5.9% 4.8 11.8% 17
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 58.8% 5.9% 5.9% 4.5 29.4% 17
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A1LC
Class Number: 1120
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Folan,Lorcan Michael Response Rate: 5/86
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.0% 3.2 20.0% 5
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 40.0% 20.0% 4.5 40.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 20.0% 3.8 60.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 20.0% 60.0% 4.0 20.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A2LC
Class Number: 1122
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Folan,Lorcan Michael Response Rate: 5/86
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.0% 3.2 20.0% 5
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 40.0% 20.0% 4.5 40.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 20.0% 3.8 60.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 20.0% 60.0% 4.0 20.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A3LC
Class Number: 1520
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Folan,Lorcan Michael Response Rate: 5/86
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.0% 3.2 20.0% 5
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 40.0% 20.0% 4.5 40.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 20.0% 3.8 60.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 20.0% 60.0% 4.0 20.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A4LC
Class Number: 25029
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Folan,Lorcan Michael Response Rate: 5/86
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 80.0% 3.2 20.0% 5
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 40.0% 20.0% 4.5 40.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 40.0% 20.0% 4.2 40.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.0% 20.0% 4.4 20.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 40.0% 4.4 60.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 20.0% 3.8 60.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 20.0% 60.0% 4.0 20.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 60.0% 4.6 40.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B1LC
Class Number: 1124
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David Response Rate: 4/100
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 75.0% 25.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 3
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 4.3 75.0% 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B2LC
Class Number: 1126
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David Response Rate: 4/100
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 75.0% 25.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 3
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 4.3 75.0% 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B3LC
Class Number: 1128
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David Response Rate: 4/100
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 75.0% 25.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 3
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 4.3 75.0% 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B4LC
Class Number: 25031
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David Response Rate: 4/100
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 75.0% 25.0% 4
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 3
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 5.0 3
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 3
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 4
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 33.3% 4.3 3
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 25.0% 50.0% 3.8 25.0% 4
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 4.3 75.0% 4
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 3
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 25.0% 4.3 25.0% 4
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: C1LC
Class Number: 1130
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: DiBartolo,Salvatore J Response Rate: 46/100
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 2.2% 97.8% 46
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.2% 95.7% 2.2% 46
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 89.1% 2.2% 4.9 8.7% 46
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 2.2% 47.8% 26.1% 4.2 23.9% 46
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 2.2% 63.0% 15.2% 4.4 19.6% 46
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 47.8% 2.2% 8.7% 10.9% 4.2 30.4% 46
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.9% 10.9% 2.2% 4.4 26.1% 46
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.2% 45.7% 4.3% 6.5% 4.2 41.3% 46
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.3% 43.5% 2.2% 6.5% 15.2% 4.0 28.3% 46
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 41.3% 10.9% 2.2% 4.2 45.7% 46
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.2% 50.0% 2.2% 2.2% 4.4 43.5% 46
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 2.2% 67.4% 2.2% 6.5% 4.5 21.7% 46
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.3% 52.2% 2.2% 6.5% 4.3 34.8% 46
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: C2LC
Class Number: 1132
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: DiBartolo,Salvatore J Response Rate: 46/100
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 2.2% 97.8% 46
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.2% 95.7% 2.2% 46
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 89.1% 2.2% 4.9 8.7% 46
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 2.2% 47.8% 26.1% 4.2 23.9% 46
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 2.2% 63.0% 15.2% 4.4 19.6% 46
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 47.8% 2.2% 8.7% 10.9% 4.2 30.4% 46
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.9% 10.9% 2.2% 4.4 26.1% 46
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.2% 45.7% 4.3% 6.5% 4.2 41.3% 46
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.3% 43.5% 2.2% 6.5% 15.2% 4.0 28.3% 46
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 41.3% 10.9% 2.2% 4.2 45.7% 46
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.2% 50.0% 2.2% 2.2% 4.4 43.5% 46
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 2.2% 67.4% 2.2% 6.5% 4.5 21.7% 46
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.3% 52.2% 2.2% 6.5% 4.3 34.8% 46
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: C3LC
Class Number: 1134
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: DiBartolo,Salvatore J Response Rate: 46/100
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 2.2% 97.8% 46
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.2% 95.7% 2.2% 46
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 89.1% 2.2% 4.9 8.7% 46
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 2.2% 47.8% 26.1% 4.2 23.9% 46
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 2.2% 63.0% 15.2% 4.4 19.6% 46
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 47.8% 2.2% 8.7% 10.9% 4.2 30.4% 46
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.9% 10.9% 2.2% 4.4 26.1% 46
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.2% 45.7% 4.3% 6.5% 4.2 41.3% 46
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.3% 43.5% 2.2% 6.5% 15.2% 4.0 28.3% 46
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 41.3% 10.9% 2.2% 4.2 45.7% 46
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.2% 50.0% 2.2% 2.2% 4.4 43.5% 46
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 2.2% 67.4% 2.2% 6.5% 4.5 21.7% 46
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.3% 52.2% 2.2% 6.5% 4.3 34.8% 46
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: C4LC
Class Number: 25033
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: DiBartolo,Salvatore J Response Rate: 46/100
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 2.2% 97.8% 46
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 2.2% 95.7% 2.2% 46
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 89.1% 2.2% 4.9 8.7% 46
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 2.2% 47.8% 26.1% 4.2 23.9% 46
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 2.2% 63.0% 15.2% 4.4 19.6% 46
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 47.8% 2.2% 8.7% 10.9% 4.2 30.4% 46
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 60.9% 10.9% 2.2% 4.4 26.1% 46
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 2.2% 45.7% 4.3% 6.5% 4.2 41.3% 46
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.3% 43.5% 2.2% 6.5% 15.2% 4.0 28.3% 46
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 41.3% 10.9% 2.2% 4.2 45.7% 46
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 2.2% 50.0% 2.2% 2.2% 4.4 43.5% 46
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 2.2% 67.4% 2.2% 6.5% 4.5 21.7% 46
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 4.3% 52.2% 2.2% 6.5% 4.3 34.8% 46
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: D1LC
Class Number: 23840
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Shopova,Siyka Response Rate: 5/82
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.2 40.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 20.0% 40.0% 20.0% 2.4 20.0% 5
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 40.0% 20.0% 4.0 40.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.6 40.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.8 20.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 2.8 40.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 20.0% 4.0 60.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 40.0% 2.8 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 20.0% 20.0% 3.2 60.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 60.0% 20.0% 20.0% 1.6 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 20.0% 40.0% 3.8 40.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: D2LC
Class Number: 23842
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Shopova,Siyka Response Rate: 5/82
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.2 40.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 20.0% 40.0% 20.0% 2.4 20.0% 5
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 40.0% 20.0% 4.0 40.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.6 40.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.8 20.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 2.8 40.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 20.0% 4.0 60.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 40.0% 2.8 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 20.0% 20.0% 3.2 60.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 60.0% 20.0% 20.0% 1.6 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 20.0% 40.0% 3.8 40.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: D3LC
Class Number: 23844
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1013: MECHANICS
Primary Instructor: Shopova,Siyka Response Rate: 5/82
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 5
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.2 40.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 20.0% 40.0% 20.0% 2.4 20.0% 5
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 40.0% 20.0% 4.0 40.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.6 40.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.8 20.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 2.8 40.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 20.0% 4.0 60.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 40.0% 2.8 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 20.0% 20.0% 3.2 60.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 60.0% 20.0% 20.0% 1.6 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 20.0% 40.0% 3.8 40.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: ALEC
Class Number: 1492
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1213: MOTION AND SOUND
Primary Instructor: Shopova,Siyka Response Rate: 2/25
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 2
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 2
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 4.0 100.0% 2
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 50.0% 1.5 2
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 50.0% 3.5 50.0% 2
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 100.0% 1.0 2
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 2.5 50.0% 2
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 50.0% 2.0 2
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 1.0 2
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 100.0% 1.0 2
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 100.0% 1.0 2
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: BLEC
Class Number: 25199
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 1213: MOTION AND SOUND
Primary Instructor: Shopova,Siyka Response Rate: 5/24
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 20.0% 80.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 20.0% 60.0% 20.0% 5
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 40.0% 40.0% 3.6 20.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% 2.2 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 2.8 40.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 3.0 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 2.2 20.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 40.0% 20.0% 2.4 20.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 40.0% 40.0% 2.8 20.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 60.0% 20.0% 1.8 20.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 40.0% 20.0% 20.0% 2.2 20.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 60.0% 20.0% 20.0% 1.6 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A1LC
Class Number: 1530
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: Petricevic,Vladimir Response Rate: 5/56
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 20.0% 80.0% 5
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 40.0% 20.0% 4.5 40.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 40.0% 40.0% 2.8 20.0% 5
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 4.0 40.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 20.0% 20.0% 3.2 60.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 20.0% 20.0% 3.0 60.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 3.4 80.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 2.8 40.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 20.0% 20.0% 3.4 60.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 20.0% 40.0% 3.2 40.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 20.0% 40.0% 3.2 40.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A2LC
Class Number: 1938
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: Petricevic,Vladimir Response Rate: 5/56
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 5
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 20.0% 80.0% 5
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 40.0% 20.0% 4.5 40.0% 5
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 40.0% 40.0% 2.8 20.0% 5
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 4.8 20.0% 5
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 4.0 40.0% 5
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 20.0% 20.0% 3.2 60.0% 5
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 20.0% 20.0% 3.0 60.0% 5
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 20.0% 3.4 80.0% 5
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 2.8 40.0% 5
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 20.0% 20.0% 3.4 60.0% 5
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 20.0% 40.0% 3.2 40.0% 5
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 20.0% 40.0% 3.2 40.0% 5
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B1LC
Class Number: 1532
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: Ostrovsky,Vladimir Response Rate: 6/79
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.5 50.0% 6
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 16.7% 33.3% 3.2 50.0% 6
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 16.7% 4.2 83.3% 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 16.7% 16.7% 4.0 66.7% 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 16.7% 4.2 83.3% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.5 50.0% 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.7 50.0% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 33.3% 4.2 16.7% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.7 50.0% 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 33.3% 3.0 16.7% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 16.7% 33.3% 3.8 50.0% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B2LC
Class Number: 1534
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: Ostrovsky,Vladimir Response Rate: 6/79
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.5 50.0% 6
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 16.7% 33.3% 3.2 50.0% 6
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 16.7% 4.2 83.3% 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 16.7% 16.7% 4.0 66.7% 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 16.7% 4.2 83.3% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.5 50.0% 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.7 50.0% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 33.3% 4.2 16.7% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.7 50.0% 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 33.3% 3.0 16.7% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 16.7% 33.3% 3.8 50.0% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B3LC
Class Number: 1536
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2023: ELECTRICITY, MAGNETISM, & FLUIDS
Primary Instructor: Ostrovsky,Vladimir Response Rate: 6/79
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 100.0% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 6
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.5 50.0% 6
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 16.7% 33.3% 3.2 50.0% 6
B2. The Recitation InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
R05 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 16.7% 4.2 83.3% 6
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 16.7% 16.7% 4.0 66.7% 6
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 16.7% 4.2 83.3% 6
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.5 50.0% 6
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.7 50.0% 6
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 33.3% 4.2 16.7% 6
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 3.7 50.0% 6
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 33.3% 3.0 16.7% 6
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 16.7% 33.3% 3.8 50.0% 6
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A1LC
Class Number: 1547
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David Response Rate: 7/53
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 83.3% 16.7% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 83.3% 16.7% 6
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 14.3% 4.8 14.3% 7
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 57.1% 14.3% 28.6% 4.3 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 57.1% 14.3% 28.6% 4.3 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 14.3% 57.1% 14.3% 14.3% 4.0 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 14.3% 57.1% 14.3% 4.2 14.3% 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 57.1% 14.3% 4.7 28.6% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 57.1% 14.3% 4.7 28.6% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 28.6% 14.3% 14.3% 4.2 42.9% 7
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 71.4% 14.3% 14.3% 4.7 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 28.6% 14.3% 14.3% 14.3% 3.8 28.6% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A2LC
Class Number: 1549
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David Response Rate: 7/53
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 83.3% 16.7% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 83.3% 16.7% 6
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 14.3% 4.8 14.3% 7
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 57.1% 14.3% 28.6% 4.3 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 57.1% 14.3% 28.6% 4.3 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 14.3% 57.1% 14.3% 14.3% 4.0 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 14.3% 57.1% 14.3% 4.2 14.3% 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 57.1% 14.3% 4.7 28.6% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 57.1% 14.3% 4.7 28.6% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 28.6% 14.3% 14.3% 4.2 42.9% 7
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 71.4% 14.3% 14.3% 4.7 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 28.6% 14.3% 14.3% 14.3% 3.8 28.6% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: A3LC
Class Number: 23858
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Primary Instructor: Mugglin,David Response Rate: 7/53
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 83.3% 16.7% 6
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 83.3% 16.7% 6
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 71.4% 14.3% 4.8 14.3% 7
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 57.1% 14.3% 28.6% 4.3 7
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 57.1% 14.3% 28.6% 4.3 7
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 14.3% 57.1% 14.3% 14.3% 4.0 7
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 14.3% 57.1% 14.3% 4.2 14.3% 7
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 57.1% 14.3% 4.7 28.6% 7
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 57.1% 14.3% 4.7 28.6% 7
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 28.6% 14.3% 14.3% 4.2 42.9% 7
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 71.4% 14.3% 14.3% 4.7 7
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 28.6% 14.3% 14.3% 14.3% 3.8 28.6% 7
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B1LC
Class Number: 1551
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Primary Instructor: DiBartolo,Salvatore J Response Rate: 10/77
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 90.0% 10.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 90.0% 10.0% 10
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 10.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 10.0% 20.0% 4.4 10.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 70.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.7 10.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 10.0% 3.9 20.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 60.0% 10.0% 20.0% 4.4 10.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 60.0% 10.0% 20.0% 4.2 10.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 40.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 40.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 20.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 60.0% 10.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 20.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B2LC
Class Number: 1553
Dept. of Applied Physics
PH-UY 2033: WAVES, OPTICS, & THERMODYNAMICS
Primary Instructor: DiBartolo,Salvatore J Response Rate: 10/77
A. Procedures and Policies#
Resp
No Yes Decline To
Answer
Q01 A detailed online course syllabus was provided at the beginning 90.0% 10.0% 10
Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 90.0% 10.0% 10
B. The InstructorAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q06 Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 80.0% 10.0% 4.9 10.0% 10
Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 60.0% 10.0% 20.0% 4.4 10.0% 10
C. Graded Assignments and ExamsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q15 Feedback on assignments was provided in a timely manner. 70.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.7 10.0% 10
Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 40.0% 10.0% 20.0% 10.0% 3.9 20.0% 10
D. InstructionAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q21 The course was effectively organized to promote the learning objectives. 60.0% 10.0% 20.0% 4.4 10.0% 10
Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 60.0% 10.0% 20.0% 4.2 10.0% 10
G1. Course DifficultyAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 40.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 40.0% 10
H. Overall EvaluationsAvg Of
Results
#
Resp
Strongly
Disagree
Moderately
Disagree
No
Opinion
Moderately
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Decline To
Answer
Q40 Value was added to my education. 50.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 20.0% 10
Q41 Overall, I would recommend the Instructor. 60.0% 10.0% 4.7 30.0% 10
Q43 Overall, I would recommend the Course. 50.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 4.2 20.0% 10
Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 1
09-June-2015
-
Spring 2015 Course Evaluation - Results
Section: B3LC
Class Numb