sreb - metadata harvesting federation of open educational resources
DESCRIPTION
Talk given to SREB SCORE group regarding integration of existing and planned state-level educational repositories, with special attention to technical interoperability and OER.TRANSCRIPT
Metadata, Harvesting, and Federation
Building the infrastructure of the global education commons
Ahrash N Bissell
Ahrash N Bissell
Metadata, Harvesting, and Federation
Building the infrastructure of the global education commons
1) Why build sharable repositories of educational content?
2) What barriers do we face?a. Legalb. Technicalc. Social
3) Discussion…
Overview
Tebndxtby Armel
The world is changing…
“Content is no longerlimited to the books, filmstrips, and videosassociated with classroom instruction; networkedcontent today provides a rich immersive learningenvironment incorporating accessible data usingcolorful visualizations, animated graphics, andinteractive applications.”
“Alongside thesetechnology improvements, “open educationalresources” offer learning content and softwaretools that support search, organization,interaction, and distribution of materials.”
“Increasingly,… the Web is beingrecognized as an enabler for collaborativecreation of significant information resources thataggregate contributions from hundreds orthousands of individuals.”
What is the future of education…?
“Adopt programs and policies to promote open educational resources. Materials funded by NSF should be made readily available on the web with permission for unrestricted reuse and recombination.”
http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08204/nsf08204.pdf
What are Open Educational Resources?
Michael Reschke cba
Digitized materials offered freely and openly for educators, students and self-learners to use and re-use for teaching, learning and research.*
*UNESCO. 2002. Forum on the impact of Open Courseware for higher education in developing countries. Final report. Paris: UNESCO.
http://www.capetowndeclaration.org/
available for anyone to use, share, and available for anyone to use, share, and adapt to suit their educational needs.adapt to suit their educational needs.
Michael Reschke cba
Open education depends on a high-quality pool of
freely licensed resources.
OER give learners access to a broad array
of knowledge materials...
What is different about OER?
Most digital media = “stuff you can see online for free”
fair-use and educational exceptions
OER = “stuff you can adapt and then share for others to build on”
license to innovate
When IP restricts access,When IP restricts access,adaptation, and sharing,adaptation, and sharing,
TebaxtTebaxtSimon musicSimon musichttp://flickr.com/photos/fruey/1368008974/
protecting the protecting the rightright to education. to education.
OER help OER help openopen doors doors
Mutual LearningMutual Learning
SharingSharing&&
Most students begin their education highly motivated to learn;
Most students begin their education highly motivated to learn;
Most teachers are highly motivated to share knowledge, not only with their students but with anyone who can benefit.
Most teachers are highly motivated to share knowledge, not only with their students but with anyone who can benefit.CC BY-NC-ND by Lara
EllerCC BY-NC-ND by Lara Eller
http://www.flickr.com/photos/99079793@N00/24786113/http://www.flickr.com/photos/99079793@N00/24786113/
And of course there are regional repositories….
Note that there are significant advantages to building an OER landscape with distinct silos of content….
• Authorship and quality control• Dedicated focus on core users• More robust “ecosystem”• Easier to manage and sustain
So the question becomes:
How do we tie these systems together, with an emphasis on findability, usability, and interoperability, to achieve a functional global educational commons…
…and yet maintain the distinctiveness of the component parts?
Text
First, a look at the Legal Barriers.
Nancy cbnhttp://flickr.com/photos/pugno_muliebriter/1384247192/
CC offers an easy way to share materials, versus the murky interpretations of fair use in copyright law.
openDemocracy cbahttp://flickr.com/photos/opendemocracy/542303769/
CC BY ...
• Allows the most freedoms without giving up attribution, which is important for credibility in education
• Is compatible with every other CC license, allowing the most room for innovation via collaboration
b
• Does not encroach on the freedom of potential users by enforcing a specified use:
i.e. CC BY-SA requires you to share alike, even if the new work is best suited for another licenseba
Text
But what about Technical Barriers?
http://flickr.com/photos/tantek/85610375/
Tantek Çelik cbn
CC overcomes Technical Barriers CC Licenses are also clear to search engines
• CC Licenses specify licensing permissions on works in metadata (RDFa)
• The metadata are also available for other applications, such as search engines, Flickr, and…
…our soon-to-be deployed Universal Education Search.
Principles for Publishing ccREL (RDFa) in HTML
Visual CorrespondenceDon't Repeat Yourself (DRY)Remix FriendlinessExtensibility & Modularity
There is a significant gap between what computers “see” and what humans see. This is one of the fundamental barriers to the infrastructure of the semantic web, but is also easily solved.
distributed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/"> Creative Commons License </a>
A Link with Flavor
distributed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/"> Creative Commons License </a>
A Link with Flavor
<h2>The Trouble with Bob</h2> <h3>Alice</h3>
Text with Flavor
<h2 property="dc:title">The Trouble with Bob</h2> <h3 property="dc:creator">Alice</h3>
• Why dc:title, why not just title? • Which meaning of "title"? Article title, job title, real estate title? • License is a reserved HTML keyword, but title is not. • We must "import" this concept from somewhere.
• The Dublin Core vocabulary: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/concepts including: title, creator, copyright, etc.• Note that it doesn’t actually matter which vocabulary is used, as long as the machine can interpret the intent.
Text with Flavor
<span xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<span rel="dc:type" href="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text" property="dc:title">My Book</span> by <a rel="cc:attributionURL" property="cc:attributionName" href="http://bissell.org/my_book">Ahrash Bissell</a>
is licensed under a
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License</a>.
<span rel="dc:source" href="http://books.org/his_book"/>Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at <a rel="cc:morePermissions" href="http://somecompany.com/revenue_sharing_agreement">somecompany.com</a>.
</span>
Content plus metadata (ontologies and specs)
Permissions and semantic architecture
And finally, the Social Barriers to Open Education
Judy Baxter cbnahttp://flickr.com/photos/judybaxter/501511984/
SocialBarriers
Technical Unfamiliarity
Workload
Organizational Pressures
Agency
Cultural
Awareness, Misconceptions
Standardized Curricula
Tenure Standards
n
Developed World
Developing World
Mine
vs
Commons
vs
Noncommercial Term
Resources
Teacher Education
Socioeconomic Factors
Time Management
Teacher Salary
(Bissell and Boyle)
learn.creativecommons.org
Send comments to: [email protected]