!!"#$%&%'()*+!

,

-.%!)/%+( 0-$%,(%.+1&

0-$2*-! 0-$'3!

0-$#+)0%.!)(4$1221).! 0-$)+(%.+1&

!!"#$%&%'()*+!!"#"$%&'(")*+"!,)-

.&/012/34456"00$7".869:;6<=":9"=56"><?@"A<;68B8C;AC=6"86D8696<=C=:E6"><"=56"F>C8;">G"H>E68<>89+":9"C"I6IJ68">G"06<C=6+"C<;"K>>8;:<C=69"<6B>=:C=:><9"L:=5"=56"C;I:<:9=8C=:><M"456".869:;6<="C?9>">E689669"/?6K=:><9"00$7+"K>>8;:<C=69"=56"00$7"5C<;J>>N+"C<;"C99:9=9"L:=5"=56"(AIC<"&69>A8K69":<"=56"00$7"

'O7&43/P"%P7Q%R%

,yukawa has been active on campus in the past year, both as a member of the sustainability community at McGill and

as an Arts and Science representative to SSMU. Additional experience cited by Ayukawa includes her role as a floor fellow for the past two years in the McGill residence system, which is one of the reasons behind her commitment to engage with first-year students.

Ayukawa’s platform is based on goals of sustain-ability, communication, and community at McGill. She notes that she would be interested in holding discussion forums at the university in order to gain feedback on important and timely issues, as well as to create an opportunity for communities of sup-port to be built on campus. Additionally, Ayukawa

aims to centralize the mental health, equity, and sustainability policies into a single SSMU execu-tive’s portfolio. She also notes a desire to enhance communication between SSMU and students, hop-ing to change up the listservs in order to encourage greater participation in projects at McGill.

Ayukawa has proven to be a strong force on campus, not only as one of the leading forces be-hind ECOLE, which seeks to create an off-campus sustainability hub, but also as a member of the greater McGill community. While her background as a floor fellow is not directly relatable to politi-cal experiences, it does display a dedication to the McGill community, an understanding of active listening, and engagement with students on a one-to-one basis.

%%&O3"S&1/2T%32

*f all the presidential candidates, Fried-land has the least experience with SSMU, instead drawing on his present position as

a floor fellow for relevant experience. In his capac-ity as a floor fellow, Friedland has facilitated Rez Project, a series of volunteer-run workshops that focus on educating students living in residence on topics of sexual assault, gender, and sexuality. He also has some HR experience outside of campus, such as his work for the Israel Democracy Insti-tute, a think tank, where he coordinated interns.

The disconnect between students and SSMU is a particular focus, with Friedland propos-ing initiatives that would increase transparency, such as a blog and more communication between student societies. Friedland has suggested hav-

ing SSMU executives participate in leading Rez Project, a move that he said would not only con-nect the executive to floor fellows and first years, thereby increasing engagement, but would also train executives in the language and issues pre-sented by the workshop. Friedland also showed an interest in communicating with other student executives at universities in Montreal and poten-tially hosting collaborative events.

Other than his focus on the disconnect be-tween students and the Society, Friedland has identified few other problems, and has not pro-posed many concrete solutions. In addition, he lacks the experience of student politics or of the internal bureaucracy of SSMU possessed by the other candidates.

!!"#$%&%'()*+! !"#$%&!'()!*+',!-!(

.#$/0!1&#2,han has experience with SSMU both as a

councillor, holding the position of Engi-neering Undergraduate Society council-

lor in the 2011-12 academic year, and as an Inter-est Group Coordinator this year. Khan himself noted that this unique experience of being a part of SSMU Council during such a politically ac-tive year makes him especially suited for the job, since he has experienced the decision-making power that SSMU can have on campus. While he has not occupied a similar Council position since that year, his institutional memory of the prob-lems that SSMU has faced in the past gives him an interesting advantage.

Khan’s platform is founded on accountability and communication, judging from his interac-tions with the press. Khan has pointed to the lack of accountability that exists within SSMU cur-rently, and if elected, aims to create an account-

ability and leadership commission independent of SSMU staff or politicians. Khan also hopes to promote bilingualism at McGill, in order to cre-ate greater ties with the Montreal community and other Quebec universities.

While Khan has been occupying a less vis-ible role on campus in comparison to some of the other candidates, he nonetheless presents a great deal of experience working with the Mc-Gill community. Khan’s ideas about outreach and accountability are especially strong and, in a year that has seen major monetary miscal-culations, such as the $21,000 Frosh loss, ac-countability of the executive is a major issue. Additionally, his understanding that commu-nication with SSMU is a two-way street is ad-mirable, as he seems to understand that execu-tives need to extend their presence outside of the SSMU building.

#34./2!56&2462

Johnson is one of the least politically visible of the presidential candidates. He has worked as a SSMU employee for the past four years,

with the past two of those years spent work-ing under the Presidential portfolio in Human Resources. Before that, he was involved with the yearbook and in graphic design. Johnson has also been involved in other campus activities such as serving on residence council, working as orienta-tion staff for Arts Frosh and SSMU Frosh, and as a tour guide.

Johnson’s platform largely focuses on increas-ing student involvement in SSMU, specifically with proposals such as changing SSMU’s use of social media and holding office hours. He also wants to work toward restoring McGill’s insti-tutional reputation, and improving the Human Resources Portfolio. While these are worthwhile

goals, they show little initiative or ambition in terms of making real changes at SSMU. Further-more, in his interview, Johnson showed little interest in expanding SSMU’s reach in the outside world, instead shifting that responsibility to other portfolios within the executive.

This lack of clear initiative and ambition comes with a pronounced emphasis on the status quo on Johnson’s part. His interview answers revealed an attitude quite conciliatory to the administration and he seems to have little interest in expanding the political strength of Council or the presidential portfolio. While his experience with SSMU is certainly commendable, the sud-den jump from behind-the-scenes to an overtly political role, especially one as important as the presidential role, necessitates that Johnson be both more forthright and ambitious.

7286$47"72.9!%63$.27:!#:31#;#)!;/.&!$747$<#./624

(he Daily endorses a “Yes” vote with reservations for Ayukawa due to her substantial experience both within SSMU and with groups on campus. She has experience

with SSMU both bureaucratically and as a politician.Having worked outside of SSMU and having actively

built relationships with groups on campus gives Ayukawa a significant advantage over the other candidates. As a floor fellow, Ayukawa has worked to create and maintain safer spaces for students. Her involvement in ECOLE as a cofounder is especially important, as the project dem-onstrates her initiative and ability to liaise between the administration and other campus bodies.

Her platform’s focus on sustainability is commendable, especially considering the loss of the Sustainability Coor-

dinator position this year. In particular, her understand-ing of and attention to equity, and to the intersections between equity, sustainability, and mental health, is sorely needed at SSMU.

However, a substantial amount of the president’s portfolio involves dealing with the administration, and the president occupies one of only two student voting seats on the Board of Governors. Ayukawa needs to take a hard line in negotiations and advocate strongly for students, some-thing that is not adequately reflected in her platform or experience. In addition, Ayukawa must seriously consider the concerns brought up by Khan about accountability in SSMU, and should consider implementing concrete mea-sures to greatly increase transparency.

!!"#$%&%'()*+!!"#"$%&'(")*+",-)!

./"'0123"4"35&.6'53789"./"':;<="4"39>?@A9="@="BC=D9E"F@B8">9G>9=9HB@HI+"=;GGJ>B@HI+"CHE"AJJ>E@HCB@HI"C::"JK"33$1L="A:;<="CHE"=9>?@A9=M"%="B89"NCHCI9>"JK"B89"38CBH9>"<;@:E@HI+"B89O"C>9">9=GJH=@<:9"KJ>"<JJD@HI">JJN="KJ>"I>J;G="CHE"KJ>"AJJ>E@HCB@HI"F@B8"=BCKK+"=;A8"C="B89"6HB9>9=B"P>J;G"'JJ>E@HCBJ>"CHE"%AB@?@B@9="Q@I8B"=BCKKM

375R%Q"RSQP

)n an unusual move, Fong is running for the posi-tion for a second year in a row, explaining, “I have the knowledge to make change but I don’t have

the time [this year].” With experience in all aspects of the job accumulated over the past year, Fong will bring a significant amount of institutional memory and momentum to the position.

Fong pledged to improve on his current day-to-day performance by being more responsive to emails, holding more office hours, and increas-ing the involvement of club representatives to better serve the needs of clubs. One long-term

project Fong discussed this year is the devel-opment of an online club management portal, which would streamline the “old and concret-ized” club structure that is currently in place, making it easier for both clubs and future VP Clubs & Services executives.

The institutional memory Fong will bring with him to the position next year will be invaluable for an organization that often has none. Fong’s intimate and first-hand knowledge of all aspects of the port-folio will allow the implementation of larger, more long-term projects.

3%QT(U%"3%2%/%7(U

"uch of Sabapathy’s experience comes from her involvement with clubs at Mc-Gill; she is currently president of three

clubs, and is an active member in others. In addi-tion, she has experience coordinating with services such as Midnight Kitchen, and has volunteered with events off-campus. Sabapathy also is familiar with the portfolio, as she has worked with both last year’s and this year’s VP Clubs & Services, as well as this year’s Interest Group Coordinator, through her executive positions in several clubs.

Sabapathy has greatly emphasized the impor-tance of the accessibility of the VP Clubs & Services role, and has proposed concrete solutions such as creating a ‘club council’ that would bring together club leaders to voice common concerns and hav-

ing more face-to-face conversations with members of clubs and services. Her platform also focuses on optimizing space in SSMU regarding room booking conflicts and unused spaces. Sabapathy spoke to the difficulties of conflicts between recurring and special events, as well as the difficulties facing clubs that want to organize workshops that exceed the current ten-hour room booking limit.

Although Sabapathy expressed an interest in events outside of McGill, she did not propose any concrete initiatives to better link the campus and the Montreal community. Sabapathy’s emphasis on a more personable approach to the job is com-mendable, but she seems to lack awareness of the significant time constraints of the job’s adminis-trative tasks, such as building management.

5QTS&35$5Q7V"375R%Q"RSQP

(he Clubs & Services position has the most direct impact on students, and an intimate familiarity with the portfolio is required.

The Daily endorses Stefan Fong, as the impor-tance of his direct experience as this year’s VP Clubs & Services cannot be overstated. Fong shows a great enthusiasm for the role and has quietly and consistently done a good job this

year. The high turnover rate of the executive is a problem that often cuts off long-term proj-ects and wastes a great deal of time on training. Fong’s candidacy will ensure a smooth transi-tion that will allow him to manage his duties more efficiently than this past year, while also beginning to implement more ambitious plans, such as the online club management portal.

!!"#$%&%'()*+! !"#$%&'()&*+',&-&.

/0&1231#4"5367&/0&1897:;<=&:7>:7?7;9?&967&@7@A7:?&BC&DD!E&F;&967&GFH7:&!B;9:7<=&<;H&IJ7A7K&KB@@J;F9LM&367L&<:7&F;&K6<:N7&BC&O77>F;N&?9JH7;9?&<G<:7&BC&=<:N7:&K<@><FN;?&9B&F@>:BP7&>B?9Q?7KB;H<:L&7HJK<9FB;&<;H&F;&KB@@J;FK<9FB;&GF96&B967:&F;?9F9J9FB;?)&@<F;9<F;&:7=<9FB;?&GF96&!KRF==S?&=<ABJ:&J;FB;?)&<;H&=BAAL&:7=7P<;9&NBP7:;@7;9?&B;&A76<=C&BC&DD!EM

14T"5&DU4R1#

!inger has a long history of campus politics. For the past year, she has worked as the Arts Undergraduate Society’s (AUS) VP Inter-

nal. In addition, she held the position of Commu-nity Affairs Coordinator, which directly involves the VP External portfolio, at SSMU. She has also worked with the SSMU Interest Group Coordina-tor, as an off-campus fellow, and as VP Internal with the Political Science Students’ Association.

Singer’s platform appears to focus less on ex-ternal affairs and more on building an internal McGill community. She hopes to run a bigger Intro to Quebec week, institutionalize support for first-year students living off-campus, rethink the Community Engagement Committee to focus

more on Milton-Parc, promote education for stu-dents on their rights as tenants, and work toward making SSMU executive positions more accessi-ble to international students. In terms of external initiatives, Singer wants to make Street Teams a bigger part of Frosh, work with and raise aware-ness about faculty associations, and build alliances with other universities – though she appears less focused on the latter point.

Singer has been less involved in campus or off-campus grassroots initiatives, though her ex-perience with institutionalized campus politics is formidable. Regardless, her lack of involvement in on-the-ground movements speaks to her long his-tory as a career politician.

"!U4"&!VED3"IU!QT"##1331&

"oustaqim-Barrette has been working as SSMU’s Campaigns Coordinator for the past year and, as such, has experience and

familiarity with the VP External portfolio. She has also been heavily involved in community organizing, such as working with Divest McGill, a group lobby-ing to divest University holdings from companies that profit from fossil fuels and tar sands. Moustaq-im-Barrette is also fully bilingual, which can facili-tate many aspects of the VP External’s role.

Moustaqim-Barrette’s platform focuses on making the External portfolio a more “consulta-

tive” position – increasing communication with McGill students through social media and other initiatives. With the impending end of TaCEQ, Moustaqim-Barrette also hopes to build an alli-ance with some of McGill’s geographically closest neighbours: Concordia, the Université de Mon-tréal, and UQAM. She is also campaigning to build bike lanes on campus.

Her involvement in community organizing initiatives, such as Divest McGill, focus on direct action, which refreshing in the current protest-phobic campus environment.

14WV#D1!143X&"!U4"&!VED3"IU!QT"##1331

The Daily endorses Amina Moustaqim-Bar-rette for VP External. While Singer’s work in student politics has been commendable,

and both of the candidates have experience with the External portfolio and the inner workings of SSMU, Moustaqim-Barrette’s platform is more focused on external initiatives and building al-liances with other Quebec universities – a cru-

cial priority in the wake of the fall of TaCEQ. Moustaqim-Barrette’s ability to fully communi-cate in French is also vital in this regard.

She has also been heavily involved in so-cial justice initiatives such as Divest McGill. At a time when SSMU has grown increasingly apolitical, a renewed focus on SSMU’s political mandate is essential.

!!"#$%&%'()*+!!"#"$%&'(")*+",-).

/0"123%3'4"%35"604&%7263879:"/0"1;<=<>:"=<?"6@:A=B;C<D";D";<">9=AE:"CF"=GGC>=B;<E"FH<?D"FACI"88$JKD"C@:A=B;<E"LH?E:B+"=D"M:GG"=D"B9:"CN:A=GG"

O%7(P443"Q&%5P4R"

,efore the student-run café’s implementation, Bradley participated in the Case Competi-tion that set out to determine its future design,

where her team placed second. Since then, Bradley has worked with last year’s SSMU president Josh Re-del on the opening of the SRC in the SSMU building, where she currently works as the menu coordina-tor. Along with her work with the SRC, Bradley has worked under the VP Finance and Operations port-folio on the Operations Management Committee. In terms of financial experience, Bradley currently holds the position of Finance Coordinator for the McGill’s Farmers Market. Interested in sustainable food on

campus, Bradley is also an Executive Director at Sec-ond Servings, a service that seeks to redistribute ed-ible leftovers to non-profits across the city.

Bradley is driven to continue divesting from Mc-Gill’s slew of unethical investments, but wants to push this initiative further by emphasizing the importance of ethical investments. Bradley also hopes to bring the SRC into its next phase, where it will build into the cafeteria space beyond the lunch counter. Bradley recognizes the role of VP Finance and Operations as extending beyond allocating funds, to working with projects and strategizing for the longevity of student-supported initiatives.

J . Daniel Chaim has worked with various Orientation initiatives for a number of years. He has been working on coordinat-

ing Arts Orientation for the past two years as the sponsorship coordinator and the operations coordinator. He also has been working at Gerts for the past two years as a bartender, and has co-ordinated numerous events on campus.

Chaim’s priorities centre around engag-ing more with the Milton-Parc community and making Frosh leaders more accountable, though in an interview with The Daily, he was vague on the specifics of the latter goal. He is largely focused on improving Orientation Week and making Frosh more accessible and inclusive. He would also like to improve the SSMU listservs,

seeing them as out-of-touch and in need of being more “customizable” and open. Furthermore, he wants to create a more accessible and easily cus-tomizable events calendar on the SSMU website.

Though Chaim has been involved in vari-ous campus initiatives, in his interview with The Daily, he spoke little to the political aspect of his role at SSMU, and while paying lip ser-vice to accessibility and equity, did not offer any significant, concrete moves to increase accessi-bility and equity in Frosh. The need to present clear goals in this position is important, as Frosh struggles with these issues every year. He also spoke little to the importance of SSMU’s links with the outside world aside from relations with the Milton-Parc community.

4356&84$437S"T36K"/674

(he Daily endorses a ‘No’ vote for J. Daniel Chaim as VP Internal. Although he has adequate qualifications to carry

out the tasks of Internal, Chaim’s platform contains little in the way of initiative: he has

no concrete plans to improve the VP Internal portfolio. This lack of drive is worrying at a time when there must be significant reform in Frosh to improve accessibility. Chaim has said nothing on the topic of sexual ha-

rassment and assault – leading us to worry that he would fail to combat rape culture at Frosh. He appears to be more interested in maintaining the status quo, which we find deeply troubling.

4356&84$437S"O%7(P443"Q&%5P4R

,radley has a decent amount of experience working in finance positions, primarily with McGill’s Farmers’ Market. She has

worked under the VP Finance and Operations portfolio. Bradley has demonstrated a thorough understanding of her role as VP Finance and

Operations in her platform and her active ac-knowledgment of the role as extending beyond finances and providing a voice on council. De-spite the fact that Bradley demonstrates good initiative in certain sustainable food movements on campus, we hope to see her sustainable agen-

da result in concrete action if elected to council. Though the role is more insular to SSMU than others, Bradley needs to look beyond initiatives inside McGill’s campus to the broader Montreal community, particularly regards to relations with other Montreal universities.

/0"2374&3%P"

!!"#$%&%'()*+! !"#$%&!'()!*+',!-!.

/0!123/4$5367!#88#3$5

69:!/0!1;<=:>?<@A!#BBC<>?!D1#E!FC<;@C<;?!@9:!>:GC@<H;?9<I!J:@K::;!55"1!C;L!@9:!"MN<GG!CLF<;<?@>C@<H;)!C;L!MHH>O

L<;C@:?!>:I>:?:;@C@<H;!H;!5:;C@:!MHFF<@@::?P!69:!/0!1#!H=:>?::?!@9:!4QR<@A!%HFF<@@::!C?!K:GG!C?!=C><HR?!BR;LO

BH>!55"1P!!

%S#3$4!564T#$6OU#23N#2

Stewart-Kanigan has substantial experi-ence working on student committees and University-level committees. Over the past

two years, Stewart-Kanigan has served as an Arts Representative to SSMU, Arts Senator, VP Exter-nal for Kanata, and has pushed countless initia-tives through with regard to academic affairs. This year, along with working on the AUS Ethical Purchasing Policy, she played an integral role in building the Indigenous Studies minor at McGill. Stewart-Kanigan was involved in the develop-

ment of AUS’s first Equity Policy and has sat on the Equity Committee. Outside of McGill, Stew-art-Kanigan has written for media outlets such as the Media Co-op.

VP UA has a direct voice on Senate, and Stew-art-Kanigan aims to bridge the gap between dif-ferent levels of student government and Senate. She recognizes the barriers students and stu-dent-serving organizations face through the bu-reaucratic process, and aims to advocate for the student voice.

42VW$54"426X!%S#3$4!564T#$6OU#23N#2

Stewart-Kanigan has been very vocal and consistently brings a strong voice to GAs, Council, and Senate. She is politically active with regard to social justice initiatives

on campus, and has ensured the institutionalization of many of these initiatives, including most recently working on build-ing the Indigenous Studies minor. Stewart-Kanigan has im-

mense experience working within the administration and is well-versed in navigating bureaucracy. In addition to working with the current VP UA, Joey Shea, over the past year, Stewart-Kanigan has a clear platform to ensure the longevity of these projects, and given her multi-year track record, has the drive to succeed at it.

TC;@!@H!Y;HK!K9H!AHR>!*+',O'Z!55"1!

:[:MR@<=:!K<GG!J:\!/H@<;]!BH>!@9:!:G:M@<H;?!C;L!

@9:!T<;@:>!>:B:>:;LRF!I:><HL!?@C>@?!8><LCA!

"C>M9!',!C;L!:;L?!8><LCA!"C>M9!*'P!

%9:MY!H;G<;:!C@!!"#$%%&'$%()"*!!H;!"C>M9!*'!BH>!G<=:!>:?RG@?!H;!K9H!AHR>!;:K!>:I>:?:;@C@<=:?!K<GG!

J:!BH>!@9:!RIMHF<;]!CMCL:F<M!A:C>P!

!!"#$%&%'()*+!!"#"$%&'(")*+",-).

!!"#$',+-)-,(%!$.,'%$*..$)+$-%/,(%!

'/$$012'%32/1+"3&%145%&61'7+"%18"4308613"&69%32/14"824'04468

*n Wednesday March 12, all 11 candidates for Stu-dents’ Society of McGill

University (SSMU) executive positions faced off in a series of debates covering their past ex-periences and future plans. The debate was also livestreamed by Elections SSMU.

PresidentThe debate held amongst the

four candidates for the position of SSMU President, Tariq Khan, Austin Johnson, Aaron Friedland, and Courtney Ayukawa, largely emphasized improving SSMU-student relations.

“I think my lack of experience […] actually helps,” stated Fried-land, whose experience largely extends to floor fellowing and fa-cilitating Rez Project. “I understand the various barriers to enter into SSMU. I understand why students don’t enter SSMU […] so I can help ensure that they join.”

“I think the approach that we need to also take in the future is to educate [the students] on the policies,” added Khan. “How many people know about the Equity Pol-icy? How many people know about the decisions [SSMU makes]?”

A member in the audience voiced their skepticism about the candidates’ promises to bridge the disconnect between the SSMU executive and undergraduate stu-dents. “One of the biggest disap-pointments I have with student politicians is that […] you’re running around different places and you pretend to care about everyone, and everyone sees your […] announce-ments. But as soon as you are in of-fice, you disappear.”

In response, Ayukawa acknowl-edged the importance that SSMU actively engage with and give voice to the student body if she were to become president.

“I think it’s really important that the SSMU executives and myself [… do] not hide behind the door of that executive office. […] I have experience with going to my constituents and hearing their voice and I also recognize that I have personal opinions. But that

doesn’t matter when I am SSMU President. The things that mat-ter when being president [are the opinions] of my constituents,” said Ayukawa.

Johnson outlined how he would go about interacting with students through social media. “[The fact that] I would like to engage with students is something that I have reiterated [… with] micro-blogging and hopefully individual Twitters, things that students can [use to] reach out to me.”

“How would you address situa-tions in executive meetings where you have to make decisions that, from a legal standpoint, will act as a corporation and not as a student union?” asked a participant.

“If you want this position […] it’s not easy. It’s not going to get easier and easier for the next per-son that does this job. […] It’s just the nature of this position. It is a business and it needs to be success-ful for it to be there,” said Johnson.

VP ExternalThe VP External debate be-

tween Amina Moustaqim-Barrette and Enbal Singer showed the plat-form divide between the two can-didates. Moustaqim-Barrette is fo-cused on political campaigns, while Singer plans to further unite the McGill community with surround-ing neighbourhoods, and work with the municipal government.

Both candidates expressed con-cern toward the outcome of the upcoming election and potential problems SSMU will face with a PQ majority.

Singer said that she hoped to work more closely with the munici-pal government, insisting, “I think that a lot of students don’t realize that municipal governments can act as a sort of a buffer for provincial legislation that could potentially impact the city.”

In contrast, Moustaqim-Bar-rette stated that she wanted to align McGill with other Montreal univer-sities in a coalition, saying that she has “been in contact with Concor-dia, UQAM, and UdeM and they’re all willing and wanting to work with us on these issues.”

The issue of French language skills was brought up in the context of communicating with Montreal and Quebec universities. While Moustaqim-Barrette is bilingual, she pointed to Singer’s lack of bi-lingualism as a potential problem.

VP Finance and Operations Kathleen Bradley is running un-

opposed for VP Finance and Opera-tions. Bradley has experience as the Head Chef of The Nest, the student-run café, and spoke on her vision for the future of the café. “[The Nest] was always meant to be a physical space for community engagement and right now we’ve only been able to really realize the food service as-pect of it,” said Bradley.

When asked about the financial impact of SSMU’s new lease for the Shatner building, Bradley told the audience, “We’re definitely going to have to incur a lot of energy ex-penses, which we’ve been planning for the last two years. Both [the VP Finance and Operations] this year and last year have been planning for the uncertainty of the lease ne-gotiations, and have been budgeting fairly conservatively.”

VP InternalJ. Daniel Chaim is running un-

opposed for VP Internal. When asked for his strategies to bet-ter engage students, Chaim re-sponded with his plan to imple-ment a SSMU calendar that could contain “SSMU events, faculty events, groups events, and I’ll keep in constant contact with VPs to keep it updated.”

He also expressed that “a lot of people don’t use social media as much as we think they do […] find-ing more mediums is another thing I’d like to research and work on.”

Despite briefly stating con-cerns about equity in his plat-form, Chaim failed to address eq-uity in an substantive manner or give any concrete suggestions to reform Frosh.

VP Clubs & ServicesStefan Fong, the incumbent can-

didate for the VP Clubs & Services position, and Sandhya Sabapathy, discussed issues such as funding for clubs, accomplishments, and plans for improvement.

Fong pointed to Activities Night, where the space was expanded to better accommodate all clubs and services who wanted to participate, as one of his accomplishments over the past year.

As part of her platform, Sabapa-thy brought up ‘Clubpedia’, an idea originally pushed by former VP Clubs & Services Allison Cooper, which would function as a Wiki-pedia for all the clubs and services available at McGill. This project, according to Sabapathy, would cut down on the learning curve and help smoothen the transition be-tween club executives.

The two candidates also dis-cussed the transparency of funding for clubs and services. Sabapathy pointed to a lack of understand-ing among clubs, along with a lack

of transparency, and asserted that they both created confusion. To combat this, Sabapathy suggested laying out a full plan by the begin-ning of the year and holding infor-mation sessions.

The timing of applications and approvals was the major barrier to transparency in Fong’s eyes. “I want to change the clubs timeline [for funding] so that clubs can apply a lot sooner, and get answers sooner about when they’re getting their money.”

VP University AffairsThe VP University Affairs po-

sition is also uncontested. During the debate, the sole candidate, Claire Stewart-Kanigan, answered questions related to equity, mental health, and academic policy.

Joey Shea, the outgoing VP Uni-versity Affairs, asked Stewart-Kan-igan several questions regarding academic policy – the largest part of the portfolio – as well as the new mental health policy that was estab-lished this year.

Stewart-Kanigan spoke to the importance of implementing the Academic Assessment Policy, say-ing, “We do have a really great […] policy that exists in the university. For example, the academic policy promoting student mental health by not allowing profs to have exams [...] worth over 75 per cent – making sure that these kind of policies are actually adhered to will make a big difference in the day-to-day lives of students.”

Regarding the to-be-formed mental health committee, she said, “I think the mental health commit-tee is going to provide a very ex-cellent forum for bringing groups across campus together to discuss issues that are important to them [...] having that body to consult with on a regular basis as well as having [the new mental health coordinator].”

Stewart-Kanigan also said that, regarding this year’s tensions with SSMU’s Equity Policy, she said that she would have taken the opportu-nity to discuss equity in a more pro-ductive manner, especially with the potential for revisions to the policy.

“I think that connecting stu-dents with the research that’s al-ready going on with the equity pol-icy as soon as possible would have been a good step.”

- With files from Igor Sadikov.

Lauria Galbraith and Emma NoradounkianThe McGill Daily

“I want to change the clubs

timeline [for funding] so that

clubs can apply a lot

sooner, and get answers sooner

about when they’re getting

their money.”Stefan Fong

VP C&S Candidate

“I think my lack of experience […] actually helps. I understand the

various barri-ers to enter into

SSMU. I under-stand why stu-

dents don’t enter SSMU […] so I can help ensure that

they join.” Aaron Friedland

Presidential Candidate