stability of cold-formed elements

Upload: ming

Post on 06-Jul-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    1/50

    STABILITY OFCOLD-FORMED ELEMENTS

    Czech Technical University in Prague

    2E12 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems 1

    21/11/2010

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    2/50

    Contents

    21/11/20102E12 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    2

    Behavior features:local buckling of compression elements

    plane elements

    elements with stiffenersshear lagweb crippling

    Cross-section checkBeams restrained by sheetingConnections

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    3/50

    Cross-section idealiseation

    21/11/2010

    3

    C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    4/50

    Cross-section

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    4

    Idealised section with radiuses r=0 when r

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    5/50

    Buckling in compression

    21/11/2010

    5

    C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    6/50

    Buckling strength

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    6

    Local bucklingDistortional buckling

    Section distortion

    Global bucklingShear buckling

    Sectional modes

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    7/50

    Buckling strength

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    7

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    8/50

    Buckling strength

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    8

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    9/50

    Local buckling

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    9

    Theory + calculation procedures(see local buckling of plates)

    Elements:doubly supported

    outstands

    stiffenedplain

    1,052com com

    pcr

    bt k Eσ

    σ σ λ σ = = com y

    f σ ≤

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    10/50

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    11/50

    Stress distribution on stiffened plate

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    11

    Calculation modelstiffener supports plane elementstiffener itself can buckle (as compression member on

    elastic foundation)

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    12/50

    Buckling of edge stiffener

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    12

    V r a n y

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    13/50

    Spring stiffness of stiffener

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    13

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    14/50

    Stress distribution - idealisation

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    14

    - distortional buckling

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    15/50

    Calculation procedure

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    15

    1. Stiffener provides rigid support to the plate ⇒effective widths

    2. K, As, Is3. Critical stress σcr4. for σcom = f y ⇒ χd (distortional buckling)5. σcom = χd fy6. Effective widths of parts adjacent to the stiffener7. As, Is8. iteration 3. – 7.9. tred = χd t

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    16/50

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    17/50

    (Vrany)

    Interaction of local and distortional buckling

    21/11/2010

    17

    C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    18/50

    http://www.ce.jhu.edu/bschafer/cufsm

    Buckling modes

    21/11/2010

    18

    C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    19/50

    Check – cross-sections, members

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    19

    EN 1993-1-3

    Limits:members0,45 ≤ t ≤ 15 mmsheeting 0,45 ≤ t ≤ 4 mm

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    20/50

    Compression

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    20

    interaction of local and global buckling

    => χ

    . 1b Rd eff y MN A f χ γ =

    1

    eff y eff R

    cr g cr g

    A f ANN A A

    λ λ σ λ

    = = =

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    21/50

    Buckling modes

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    21

    ( D u

    b i n a

    )

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    22/50

    Flexural-torsional buckling

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    22

    uniaxial symmetrical profiles

    torsional buckling:flexural-torsional buckling: …combination

    buckling curve b

    2w

    cr,T t2 2g o T

    1 EIGI

    A iπ

    σ = +

    cr,TFσ cr,T cr,, yσ σ

    ( )22cr,y y yE iσ π =

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    23/50

    Members subjected to bending

    21/11/2010

    23

    C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    24/50

    Bending

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    24

    Lateral-torsional buckling

    Specific design of cold-formed members in bendingsubjected to lateral-torsional buckling

    ( ).eff Rd LT eff ydM W f χ =

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    25/50

    Behaviour - Z section in bending

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    25

    Slender section → local bucklingEdge stiffener – distortional buckling

    Non-symmetry →distortion of cross-sectionOut-of-plane buckling of free flange in hoggingmoment areas

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    26/50

    Cross-section distortion

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    26

    C D

    +

    -

    -

    +

    +

    -

    +

    +

    -

    -Reality Idealized model

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    27/50

    Cross-section distortion

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    27

    Simplified model

    K

    C D

    +=

    y

    z

    y

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    28/50

    Calculation procedure EN1993-1-3

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    28

    Sagging moments:

    Hogging moments:

    ,1

    ,

    y EdEd yd y M

    eff y

    Mf f

    Wσ γ = ≤ =

    ,

    1,

    y Ed fzEd yd y M

    eff y fz

    M Mf f W Wσ γ χ = + ≤ =

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    29/50

    Web crippling

    21/11/2010

    29

    C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    30/50

    (Vrany)

    Web crippling

    21/11/2010

    30

    C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    31/50

    (Vrany)

    Web crippling

    21/11/2010

    31

    C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    32/50

    Web crippling

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    32

    Eccentric compression to webRw,Rd …equations derived experimentally

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    33/50

    Web crippling

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    33

    Cases:Single web

    Two or more webs

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    34/50

    Web crippling

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    34

    Loading – cases:a) close to free endb) far from free end

    a) from one sideb) from both opposite sides

    Rw,Rd = f(t 2, r/t, f, s s …)product of individual factors

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    35/50

    Interaction

    21/11/2010

    35

    C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    36/50

    Combination M+R

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    36

    Governing condition e.g. for corrugated sheeting,continuous beams

    c,Rd w,Rd

    1,25Ed EdM FM R

    + ≤

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    37/50

    Combination compression + bending

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    37

    ,E d E d ,z N yM N e∆ =

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    38/50

    Shear lag

    21/11/2010

    38

    C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    39/50

    Shear lag

    21/11/2010Thin walled and composite structures / Michal Jandera /

    39

    by elastic analysis (I. order) ⇒ both tension andcompressionfactor of ratio Le/ b 0 … to solve when Le/ b 0 < 50

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    40/50

    Shear lag

    21/11/2010Thin walled and composite structures / Michal Jandera /

    40

    for thin-walled sections, b 0:

    Effective width:

    ( )0

    max

    b

    eff

    y dyb

    σ

    σ

    =∫

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    41/50

    Shear lag

    21/11/2010Thin walled and composite structures / Michal Jandera /

    41

    Effective width:Effective width factor

    0eff b b β = ⋅

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    42/50

    Connections

    21/11/2010

    42

    C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    43/50

    Connections

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    43

    Weldsfillet

    t ≥ 3 mm (automatic … t ≥ 2 mm)

    MAG is bestlap connections

    spot

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    44/50

    Connections

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    44

    Mechanical fastenersblind rivetsscrews 3 ≤ d ≤ 8 mm

    self-drilling (self-tapping)thread-cutting

    cartridge fired pinsbolts

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    45/50

    Blind rivets

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    45

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    46/50

    Screws

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    46

    Different failure modes compared with classic bolts

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    47/50

    New types of connections

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    47

    “Rossete” system

    Adhesive bonding (problem of lifespan reliability)

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    48/50

    Design aids

    21/11/2010

    48

    C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    49/50

    Design aids

    21/11/2010C9 Design of steel structures for renewable energy systems

    49

    Tables

    PRO IL

    váha profilu řádek rozpětí pole L [m] rozpětí pole L [m]

    číslo 5,0 6,0 7,0 8,0 9,0 10,0 5,0 6,0 7,0 8,0 9,0 10,01 3,41 2,34 1,70 1,29 1,00 4,91 3,03 2,09 1,54 1,192 3,41 2,34 1,70 1,15 4,91 3,03 2,09 1,54 1,19

    Z 250/2,0 3 3,28 1,86 1,15 4,91 3,03 2,09 1,48 1,027,80 kg/m 4 2,49 1,63 1,12 3,95 2,48 1,70 1,25

    5 -2,44 -1,65 -1,19 -0,89 -0,69 -3,95 -2,64 -1,90 -1,43 -1,116 -1,92 -1,29 -0,91 -0,68 -0,52 -3,16 -2,08 -1,48 -1,10 -0,851 4,61 3,17 2,31 1,74 1,36 1,08 6,59 4,10 2,84 2,11 1,64 1,30

    2 4,61 3,17 2,28 1,50 1,02 6,59 4,10 2,84 2,11 1,64 1,30Z 250/2,5 3 4,25 2,42 1,49 0,97 6,59 4,10 2,84 1,92 1,329,70 kg/m 4 3,66 2,43 1,68 1,20 5,75 3,57 2,47 1,83 1,41 1,03

    5 -3,31 -2,26 -1,63 -1,22 -0,95 -0,75 -5,29 -3,58 -2,59 -1,95 -1,52 -1,216 -2,81 -1,91 -1,37 -1,02 -0,78 -0,62 -4,53 -3,04 -2,19 -1,64 -1,27 -1,01

    PROSTÝ NOSNÍK SPOJ ITÝ NOSNÍK S PŘES HY

  • 8/18/2019 Stability of Cold-Formed Elements

    50/50

    Design aids

    2E12

    50

    Software