stage-1 [ ] stage-2 [ ] pt paripurna swakarsa mutu … · 2014-11-02 · prepared by mutuagung...

PT. MUTUAGUNG LESTARI

ASSESSMENT REPORT

Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil Certification

[ ]Stage-1 [ ] Stage-2 [√] Surveillance [ ] Re-Assessment

Plantation Management/Owner : SIME DARBY PLANTATION Sdn Bhd.

Plantation Name : PT PARIPURNA SWAKARSA

Location :

Village of Pondok labu and Rampa Cengal

Pamukan Selatan and Pamukan Utara Sub

District Kotabaru District, South Kalimantan

Province

Certificate Code : MUTU-RSPO/016

Date of certificate issue : March, 16th 2012

Date of expiry of certificate : March,15th 2017

Assessment Assessment

Date PT. Mutuagung Lestari

Auditor Review

By Approved

by

S2 24 – 28

Februrary 2014

Bukti Bagja (Lead Auditor Witnesser), Taufik

Margani (Lead Auditor Witnessed), Muardi

Marwas, Sandra Purba, Brigitta Prita (Trainee

Auditor), Yohanes Hardian (Observer)

Octo HPN

Nainggolan

Tony

Arifiarachman

Mutuagung Lestari • Raya Bogor Km 33,5 Number 19 • Cimanggis • Depok 16953• Indonesia

Telephone (+62) (21) 8740202 • Fax (+62) (21) 87740745/6

Email : [email protected] ● www.mutucertification.com

MUTU Certification • Accredited by Accreditation Services International on March 12th, 2014

Assessment Approved by MUTUAGUNG LESTARI on:

S2 13 May 2014

http://www.mutucertification.com/


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5 ii Prepared by Mutuagung Lestari for Pondok Labu POM – PT Paripurna Swakarsa-Sime Darby Plantation Sdn Bhd.

TABLE OF CONTENT

FIGURE

Figure 1. Location Map of PT Paripurna Swakarsa Figure 2. Operational Map of PT Paripurna Swakarsa

3 4

1.0 SCOPE of the SURVEILLANCE ASSESSMENT

1.1 National Interpretation Used 5

1.2 Organization Information 5

1.3 Type of Assessment 5

1.4 Location of Plantations, Mill and Area Statement 5

1.5 Description of Supply Base 6

1.6 Dates of Plantings and Cycles 7

1.7 Tonnage Certified 7

1.8 Other Certifications 8

1.9 Time-Bound Plan for Other Management Units 8

2.0 ASSESSMENT PROCESS

2.1 Certification Body 10

2.2 Assessment Team 10

2.3 Assessment Methodology, Assessment Process and Locations of Assessment 10

2.4 Stakeholder Consultation and List of Stakeholders Contacted 13

2.5 Date of Next Surveillance Visit 13

3.0 ASSESSMENT FINDINGS

3.1 3.2

Summary of Assessment Report of the RSPO Certification Summary of Assessment Report of Supply Chain Requirement

14 33

3.3 Conformity Checklist of Certificate and Logo Use 39

3.4 Summary of RSPO Partial Certification 39

3.5 Identification of Findings, Corrective Actions, Observations, Opportunity for Improvement and Noteworthy Positive Components

41

3.6 Summary of Arising Issues from Public, Management and Auditor Responses 49

4.0 CERTIFIED ORGANIZATION’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INTERNAL RESPONSIBILITY

4.1 Formal Signing of Assessment Findings 55

APPENDICES

1. List of Stakeholders Contacted in the RSPO Certification Process 56

2. Assessment Program 57

3. Glossary 58

PT MUTUAGUNG LESTARI

ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5 3 Prepared by Mutuagung Lestari for Pondok Labu POM – PT Paripurna Swakarsa-Sime Darby Plantation Sdn Bhd.

Figure 1. Location Map of PT Paripurna Swakarsa

PT MUTUAGUNG LESTARI

ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5 4 Prepared by Mutuagung Lestari for Pondok Labu POM – PT Paripurna Swakarsa-Sime Darby Plantation Sdn Bhd.

Figure 2. Operational Map of PT Paripurna Swakarsa

PETA AREAL STATEMENT AREA PAMUKAN TAHUN 2010

Ds. Mulyoharjo

Ds. Lintang Jaya

Ds. Binturung

Ds. Pamukan Indah Ds. Wonorejo

Ds. Bakau

Ds. Pondok Labu

Sungai Tamiang

Sungai Tamiang

Dmg. Pukung

Sungai Tamiang

Bin

turu

ng

Sungai Tamiang

Bin

turu

ng

Ds. Kalian Dmg. Sekumbang

Su

ng

ai C

en

gal

Bin

turu

ng

Su

ng

ai C

en

gal

Bin

turu

ng

SungaiDs. Tamiang

Ds. Harapan Baru

Dmg. Rampa

Ds. Rampa Cengal

Ds. Sakadoyan

Ke Simpang Banian

Ds. Sesulung

Sungai Manunggul

Su

ng

ai C

en

gal

Bin

turu

ng

(PLE)

(RPE)

PROPINSI KALIMANTAN TIMURN

KECAMATAN SAMPANAHAN

KECAMATAN PAMUKAN SELATAN

TELUK PAMUKAN

KECAMATAN PAMUKAN UTARA(SCE)

(BNE)

(SSE)

III

(BBE)

(BKE)

Div. IIIDiv. II

Div. II

Div. I

Div. II

Div. III

Div. IV

Div. I

Div. II

Div. IV

Div. III

DIV. II DIV. II

DIV. I

DIV.

DIV. IV


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5

Prepared by Mutuagung Lestari for Pondok Labu POM - PT Paripurna Swakarsa-Sime Darby Plantation Sdn Bhd.

1.0 SCOPE OF THE CERTIFICATION ASSESSMENT

1.1 National Interpretation Used National Interpretation, RSPO Principles and Criteria (P&C) for Sustainable Palm Oil

Production, Republic of Indonesia - RSPO INA-NIWG, May 2008 and RSPO Supply Chain

Certification Standard November 2011.

1.2 Organization Information

1.2.1 Company name PT. PARIPURNA SWAKARSA – SIME DARBY Plantation Sdn Bhd.

1.2.2 Contact person Mohamad Pirabaharan

1.2.3 Company address and site address Head Office: The Plaza Lt.36 Jl. M.H. Thamrin Kav. 28-30 Jakarta 10350

Location : Village of Pondok Labu, South Pamukan and north Pamukan sub district Kotabaru, district South Borneo province

1.2.4 Telephone 021 29926000

1.2.5 Fax 021 29926000

1.2.6 E-mail [email protected]

1.2.7 Web page address www.simedarby.com

1.2.8 Company status PMA

1.2.9 Management Representative who completed the application for certification Mohamad Pirabaharan

1.2.10 Registered as RSPO member 1-0008-04-000-00 – 8 December 2004

1.3 Type of Assessment

1.3.1 Scope of Assessment

Palm Oil Mill (Pondok Labu Factory) and supply base Binturung estate, Rampa estate, Pondok Labu estate and Sesulung estate).

1.3.2 Type of certificate Single

1.3.3 Company names listed in the certificate

PT Paripurna Swakarsa – Sime Darby Plantation Sdn Bhd.

1.3.4 Number of management unit One Palm oil (Pondok Labu) and four estate (Binturung estate, Rampa estate, Pondok Labu estate and Sesulung estate)

1.4 Locations of Mill, Plantations and Area Statement

1.4.1 Location of Mill

Name of Mill Location

GPS

Latitude Longitude

Pondok Labu Factory Pondok Labu village, Pamukan Selatan sub-district, Kotabaru District, South Borneo Province

02º28’53,2” S 116º30’45,2” E

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.simedarby.com/


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


1.4.2 Location of Supply Base

Name of Supply Base

Location GPS

Latitude Longitude

Binturung Estate Binturung village, Pamukan Selatan sub-district, Kotabaru District, South Borneo Province

2º22º00” - 2º26’57” S 116º23’46” - 116º28’00” E

Pondok Labu Esatae

Pondok Labu village, Pamukan Selatan sub-district, Kotabaru District, South Borneo Province

2º23º16” - 2º27’37” S 116º28’00” - 116º32’35” E

Rampa Estate Rampa Cengal village, Pamukan Selatan sub-district, Kotabaru District, South Borneo Province

2º23º54” - 2º29’08” S 116º24’15” - 116º29’47” E

Sesulung Estate Sesulung village, Pamukan Selatan sub-district, Kotabaru District, South Borneo Province

2º27º00” - 2º33’51” S 116º28’34” - 116º31’49” E

1.4.3 Tenure

Private 16.011,98 Ha

State HGU No. 137/HGU/BPN/97 = 14.892 Ha HGU on progress (Latter BPN Province of Kal.Sel No. 0013/9-63/I/2010) = 1.514 Ha

Community

1.4.7 Area Statement

Total area 16,011.98 Ha

Mature area 14,512.07 Ha

Mill /Emplashment /Infrastructure 831.5 Ha

Immature area 151.7 Ha

Nursery/ road/ Others area 47 Ha

Occupation 65.1 Ha

HCV 404.7 Ha

1.5 Description of Supply Base

1.5.1 Description of Mill

Name of Mill Capacity

(tones/ hour)

FFB Processed

(tonnes/ year)

CPO Palm Kernel PKO

Out put (tones)

Extraction (%)

Out put (tones)

Extraction (%)

Out put (tones)

Extraction (%)

Pondok Labu Factory

60 244,092 561,142 23 11,570 4.74 - -

*Source Production Data on February 2013 – January 2014

1.5.2 Description of Estate(s)

Name of Estate(s) Total Area

(Ha)

Planted Area (Ha)

FFB (tones/year)

Yield (tones/ha/year)

Supplied to Mill

FFB (tones/y

ear) %

Binturung Estate 4,072.02 3,562.15 58,461 16.41 58,461 100

Pondok Labu Esatae 3,672.72 3,495.79 57,259 16.37 57,259 100

Rampa Estate 3,658.61 3,310.31 57,392 17.25 57,392 100

Sesulung Estate 4,608.64 4,295.38 67,515 15.17 67,515 100

TOTAL 16,011.99 14,663.63 240,627 16.3 240,62

7 100

*Source Production Data on February 2013 – January 2014


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


1.5.3 Smallholder(s) and other source

Name of

source(s) Member(s) Location

Total Area (Ha)

FFB (tones/year)

Supplied to Mill

FFB (tones/year)

%

KKPA ASC* 260 Binturung 410 3,466.42 3,466.42

Total 260 410 3,466.42 3,466.42

*Based on KKPA ASC (Area Sungai Cengal) that has been productive.

1.5.4 Product categories FFB/CPO/PK/PKO

1.6 Dates of Plantings and Cycles

1.6.1 Age profile of planted palms*

Planting Year Hectare

BNE PLE RPE SSE Total (Ha)

1994 183.65 183.65

1995 519.28 94.08 121.18 428.28 1,162.82

1996 1,398.91 1,097.83 253.36 255.83 3,005.93

1997 854.97 1,599.03 1,319.41 1,484.77 5,258.18

1998 677.15 254.16 1,521.46 2,452.77

2000 74.88 74.88

2001 27.70 27.70

2002 419.65 419.65

2005 465.63 173.85 62.93 702.41

2006 44.81 244.43 131.01 420.25

2007 153.37 411.09 564.46

2008 193.64 193.64

2010 45.72 45.72

2012 20 20

2013 131,55 131,55

TOTAL 3,562.15 3,495.79 3,310.31 4,295.38 14,663.63

1.6.2 New Planting area after November 2007 239.36 Ha

1.6.3 Planting Cycle 1st Cycle Years

1.7 Approximate Tonnage Certified

1.7.1 Past Annual Claim Certified Product

FFB Production 274,770.82 Tonnes/year

CPO Production 65.258 Tonnes/year

Palm Kernel (PK) Production 13,738.95 Tonnes/year

Palm Kernel Oil (PKO) Production Tonnes/year

1.7.2 Claim Certified Tonnage of FFB

Name of Estate(s) Total Area

(Ha) Planted Area

(Ha) FFB

(tones/year) Yield

(tones/ha/year)

Binturung Estate 4,072.02 3,562.15 74,269 17

Pondok Labu Esatae 3,672.72 3,495.79 75,595 16

Rampa Estate 3,658.61 3,310.31 57,392 15

Sesulung Estate 4,608.64 4,295.38 67,515 14

TOTAL 16,011.97 14,663.63 274,771 16


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


1.7.3 Claim Certified Tonnage of Palm Product

Name of Mill Capacity

(tones/ hour)

FFB Processed

(tonnes/ year)

CPO Palm Kernel PKO

Out put (tones)

Extraction (%)

Out put (tones)

Extraction (%)

Out put (tones)

Extraction (%)

Pondok Labu Factory

60 274,771 63,197 23 13,739 5.00

1.8 Other Certifications

1.8.1 ISO 9001:2008/ISO 14001: 2004 -

1.8.2 OHSAS 18001:2007 -

1.8.3 HACCP -

1.8.4 Others -

1.9 Time Bound Plan

ManagementUnit Location

Hectare (Ha)

Time Bound Plan

Status Mills Estates

Sekunyir PT. Indotruba Tengah District of Seruyan and Kotawaringin Barat – Province of Central Kalimantan

7,734.60 2009 Certified

2010

Manggala PT. Tunggal Mitra Plantations

District of Rokan Hilir – Province of Riau 13,836.00 2009

Certified 2010

Bukit Ajong PT. Sime Indo Agro District of Sanggau – Province of West Kalimantan

11,652.00 2009 Certified

2010

Teluk Siak PT. Aneka Inti Persada

City of Pekanbaru and District of Siak – Province of Riau

11,134.00 2010 Certified

2011

Sungai Pinang PT. Bina Sains Cemerlang

District of Musi Rawas – Province of South Sumatera

6,513.00 2010 Certified

2012 Sukamandang PT. Kridatama Lancar District of Seruyan and Kotawaringin

Timur – Province of Central Kalimantan 14,779.92 2010

Certified 2011

Pemantang PT. Teguh Sempurna District of Seruyan and Kotawaringin Timur – Province of Central Kalimantan

16,601.66 2010 Certified

2011

Alur Dumai PT. Lahan Tani Sakti District of Rokan Hilir – Province of Riau 3,759.02 2010

Certified 2012

Teluk Bakau PT. Bhumireksa Nusasejati

District of Indra Giri Hilir – Province of Riau

25,662.00 2010

Certifed 2011

Mandah 2013

Certified 2014

Mustika PT. Sajang Heulang District of Tanah Bumbu – Province of South Kalimantan

7,794 2012

Certified 2011

Angsana Mini 2010

Certified 2011

Full Manage Plasma (KKPA)

16,000 2013

Certified 2013

Angsana PT. Ladangrumpun Suburabadi

District of Tanah Bumbu – Province of South Kalimantan

6,077.00 2010 Certified

2011

Gunung Aru PT. Bersama Sejahtera Sakti

District of Kotabaru – Province of South Kalimantan

12,704.54 2010 Certified

2011 Ladang Panjang PT. Bahari Gembira

Ria District of Muaro Jambi – Province of Jambi

1,202.04 2010 Certified

2012

Bebunga PT. Langgeng Muaramakmur


16,361.77 2011 Certified

2012

Pondok Labu PT. Paripurna Swakarsa


14,892.00 2011 Certified

2012


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


Selabak PT. Swadaya Andika District of Kotabaru – Province of South Kalimantan

10,361.18 2011 Certified

2012

Rantau

PT. Laguna Mandiri


15,299.80 2011

Certified 2011

Betung 2013

Certified 2014

Ungkaya PT. Tamaco Graha Krida

District of Morowali – Province of Central Sulawesi

4,145.00 2011 Certified

2012

Rantau Panjang PT. Guthrie Pecconina Indonesia

District of Musi Banyuasin – Province of South Sumatera

10,139.91 2011 Certified

2012

Lembiru PT. Sandika Natapalma

District of Ketapang – Province of West Kalimantan

8,406.21 2011 Certified

2014

PT. Budidaya Agrolestari

District of Ketapang – Province of West Kalimantan

2011

Audited 2011

MAS PT. Mitra Austral Sejahtera

District of Sanggau – Province of West Kalimantan

8,741.29 2011 Audited

2011

Blang Simpo PT. Perkasa Subur Sakti PT. Padang Palma Permai PT. Perusahaan Sri Kuala

District of Aceh Tamiang and District of Aceh Timur- Province of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam 6,451.99

1,128.90 2011

Certified 2013

Sime Darby has 39 management units in Malaysia and 21 Management Units in Indonesia which have been certified by RSPO. There was a change in the Time Bound Plan of Sime Darby causing Sime Darby postponed other certification processes of its subsidiary companies. Change of the Time Bound Plan explanation: PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera. There is still unresolved social issue from Palm Oil Farmer Union (Serikat Petani Kelapa Sawit/SPKS) Sanggau, however the improvement is in progress. Sime Darby has informed the Time Bound Plan progress; therefore MUTUAGUNG has considered that Sime Darby complies with the RSPO requirement for partial certification.


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


2.0 ASSESSMENT PROCESS

2.1 Certification Body

PT Mutuagung Lestari

Jl. Raya Bogor Km 33,5 No. 19, Cimanggis - Depok 16953

Telp. +62-21-8740202; Fax +62-21-87740745/46

Website: www.mutucertification.com Email : [email protected]

2.2 Assessment Team

2.2.1 Lead Assessor and Assessment Team

S2 1. Taufik Margani (Lead Auditor Witnessed). A bachelor of Forestry, Majoring in Forest Management. A specialist in Environment. He had led a number of audits for Sustainable Forest Management in Indonesia (under the scheme of LEI-Lembaga Ekolabel Indonesia/Indonesia Ecolabel Body and FSC-Forest Stewardship Council) and Lead Auditor for FSC Chain of Custody. Other experiences: He was the certified Lead Auditor of IRCA for Environmental Management System and Quality Management System. Since 1999, he had worked for an independent certification body and had conducted a number of Audits of Environmental Management System, Quality Management System and RSPO in Malaysia and Indonesia. Currently, he works as General Manager of Resources Management Certification Division.

2. Bukti Bagja (Lead Auditor Witnesser). Master of Science majoring environment, Indonesia University. He had involved in RSPO assessment and HCV for GIS. The training he has followed namely .ArcGIS, MAPInfo, Global Mapper, ER MAPPER, ERDAS Imagine, Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil auditor and Awareness RSPO, and Auditor/Lead auditor Management System Certification (ISO 9001-2008)

3. Muardi Marwas (Auditor). Bachelor of Agriculture Bogor Agriculture Institute. Attended RSPO and ISPO Assessment in Indonesia. He had been trained Auditor/Lead auditor Management System Certification (ISO 9001-2008), Awareness HACCP certification, training of RSPO auditor and training of RSPO Lead Auditor, ISPO Lead auditor training, awareness green house gas and Wittednessed Distribution Quality Management Process (DQMP) APMEA. Currently he works for Independent Certification Body. He had involved activities RSPO and ISPO certification assessment as an auditor.

4. Sandra Purba (Auditor). Bachelor of Forestry, Department of Forest Products Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of North Sumatra. Have experience working in oil palm plantations Company. She had attended such training: Training Expert of OHSAS General, Training ISPO Auditor, Awareness RSPO, training ISO 22000 - 2009 and Auditor/Lead auditor Management System Certification (ISO 9001-2008). Currently she worked as an auditor at Certification Body.

5. Brigitta Prita (Auditor Trainee). Bachelor of Forestry, Department of Forest Resources Conservation and Ecotourism, Bogor Agricultural University. Attended training ISPO Auditor training and certification of ISO 9001:2008 quality management system (QMS).

6. Yohanes Hardian (Observer). Diploma 3 of Forest Resource Conservation, Faculty of Forestry, Institute of Pertanian Bogor, Environment and Wildlife Specialist. He had attended HCV training, involved in HCV identification in some Oil Palm Companies. He worked as an environmental staff in Oil Palm Company. At this audit he assessed environmental aspect.

2.3 Assessment Methodology, Assessment Process and Locations of Assessment

2.3.1 Figure of person days to implement assessment

S-2

Number of auditor: 4 auditor Number of activity day at the location: 3.5 days Number of working day for surveillance 2 activity:14 persons day

2.3.2 Detail process of assessment

S-2

Surveillance 2 objective is to measure PT. Paripurna Swakarsa implementation over national interpretation on RSPO principle and criteria (P&C)’s requirement for sustainable palm oil plantation (RSPO INA-NIWG, Mei 2008) and RSPO

http://www.mutucertification.com/



ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


Supply Chain Certification Standard (SCCS) for CPO Mill in November 2011.

There are 4 types of measurement, such as: (1) Document’s review, in order to evaluate the completeness, validity and content of the required documents; (2) Interview, in order to gather in-depth information; and (3) Field observation, in order to evaluate the sufficient implementation in the field compare to interview result and information that stated in document; (4) Consultation with surrounding community and related agencies.

The MUTU auditor gave some suggestions for improvement based on surveillance 2 evaluation over management unit (SAA). The result will become a verification material for the up-coming surveillance 3. The entire generating information was documented in PT Mutuagung Lestari’s Check List and become the main annex in surveillance report.

Detail of surveillance activity:

25th February 2014. Team audit conducting the Opening meeting at RSPO secretariat in PT Paripurna Swakarsa Sesulung Estate (SSE), followed by document’s review (procedure, interview record with PT PSA personnel) in the afternoon and completing the check list for legal, social, production and environment aspect.

26th February 2014.

During field observation and interview, the team was divided into some groups, such as: 1. Observation over HCV area, boundary poles’ maintenance especially in Rampa Estate area (RPE) and Sesulung

Estate (SSE) 2. Observation over land management and surface water quality management and interview with local community

regarding the impact of plantation and mill’s activity toward social and environment. 3. Observation over Best Management Practice, Health and Safety, Manpower, Facility and Infrastructure in

Sesulung and Rampa Estates 27th February 2014. During field observation and interview, the team was divided into some groups, such as: 1. Palm oil mill (the entire process in each station, from accepting FFB to CPO dispatch, environment and

manpower aspect and SCCS). 2. Field visit and interview with local community regarding the impact of estate and mill’s activity (social and

environment aspect). Team conducting clarification over previous field visit, document’s review and completing the checklist and discussing the compliance over standard implementation. 28th February 2014. Team closing meeting. Travel to PT Langgenag Muaramakmur (LMR) The surveillance program can be seen in annex 2.

2.3.3 Locations of Assessment

S-2 Field visit to locations, which have an issue over company’s operational activity. The locations were selected based on public consultation result and document’s review. The samples were chosen by (x= 0,8 √y) formulation. The visited locations during surveillance 2 are:

26-27 February 2014

Location-1. Biyuku sub village, Pondok Labu village (Head of village). Interview regarding the positive and negative impacts from estate and mill’s activity with community in Pondok Labu village; to gain social and land information.

Location-2. Biyuku sub village, Community leader (Mr. Jaim).Interview regarding the positive and negative impacts from estate and mill’s activity with community in Pondok Labu village; to gain social and land information.

Location-3. Biyuku River (close to block E15 – Pondok Labu Estate). Observation on river’s water quality, interview with PSA staff regarding the monitoring and management of surface water’s quality.


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


Location-4. Spare River (Division I Hut I near Pondok Labu Estates). Observation on river’s water quality, interview with PSA staff regarding the surface water’s quality monitoring and management.

Location-5. Headwater of Separe River, (outside and beyond the Pondok Labu Estates location).Observation on river’s water quality, interview with PSA staff regarding the monitoring and management of surface water’s quality.

Location-6. Water Management, Block N-08, Block O-07, Block W-008 and Block M-006, Sesulung Estate Observation and interview on narrow area’s management by sustaining the high level of surface water; and manually maintaining water flow (trench/river).

Location-7. HCV, Pantai V Sesulung Estate. Observation and interview on HCV management with a manually buffer management.

Location-8. Division IV, Sesulung Estate. Observation and interview on hilly and sandy area by using big-sized silt pit and filled with empty fruit bunch as a growth medium for Neprolephis, in order to prevent erosion and land degradation.

Location-8. Block Q-001, Sesulung Estate. Observation and interview on hilly area with planting year in 1995/1996. The company established the terrace ring in December 2013, which not only to make the harvesting activity easier but also to minimize erosion and land degradation.

Location-9.Palm oil mill (Pondok Labu Factory). Observation on FFB processing into CPO, review over SCCS implementation’s document.

Location-10. Observation on HGU PSA stake 18 in Block V 001, HGU PSA stake 15 in Block U 001, HGU poles are in a good condition and pole 18 is side by side with riparian area and pointed as an HCV 4. There are buffer zone symbols in Sesulung Estate meanwhile pole 02 and 15 are side by side with Sesulung Plasma State.

Location-11. Romania river in Block T 001 is a swap area, which affected by tide. This location covered with mangrove vegetation and categorized as an HCV 4 area in Sesulung Estate.

Location-12. Observation on HGU PSA pole 03 Block J005, HGU PSA pole 04 Block L005, HGU PSA pole 06 Block M004 shows a good condition in Rampa Estate.

Location-13.Observation on HCV 3 area (endangered ecosystem). Block M009 is a swamp area, which affected by tide. This location covered by Nipah, mangrove, and Gelam vegetation, which is also a habitat for crocodile. There are HCV 3 symbols in Rampa Estate.

Location-14. Observation on HCV 4 area, which is a hilly area that protecting water source. There are HCV 4 symbols covered by bushes and Sungkai, Mahang Vegetation in Block M009 of Rampa Estate.

Location-15. Riparian area in Binturung has HCV symbols. Types of vegetation in this area are Nipah, Pakis, Gelam and Mangrove, located in Rampa Estate.

Location-16. Mill (PKS) Pondok Labu Factory. Field observation related to mill’s operation from FFB’s acceptance (weight bridge), FFB grading in loading ramp, to processing mechanism.

Location-17. Mill (PKS) Pondok Labu Factory. Monitor the implementation of SMK3 in processing station, such as: Sterilizer, Thresher, Digester, Nut Cracker, Engine Room, and Boiler.

Location-18. Hazardous temporary landfill in Pondok Labu mill. Monitor the remaining hazardous waste in warehouse, verify the waste balance, monitor the existence of oil trap, etc.

Location-19. The management of liquid waste pond (IPAL). Monitor the management of liquid waste pond and its condition and to ensure no leakage in flowing hose for land application.

Location-20. Polyclinic. Observation on health facility and infrastructure as well as the medical waste management. The generating medical waste will be sent to the third party who has a license to destroy the medical waste.

Location-21. WORKSHOP. Observation and interview with head of workshop regarding the availability and condition of fire extinguisher and the implementation of occupational health and safety.

Location-22.TPSA. Field observation regarding domestic waste management.

Location-23.TPA. Observation over the availability of fire extinguishers in housing; number of children; facility and


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


working hour (from 06.00 to 14.00).

Location-24. Housing in DIV. 1 Sesulung. Observation and interview with personnel and their families regarding the housing facility, access to clean water, waste management, complain mechanism related to housing improvement, verification on gender committee meeting and emergency response.

Location-25. Sesulung Village. Conducting interview with head of Sesulung Village regarding the relationship between company and community (community leader) in local village, communication and complain mechanism, work opportunity for local people, the existence of indigenous right inside the plantation area.

Location-26. Rampa Cengal Village. Conducting interview with head of Rampa Cengal Village regarding the relationship between company and community (community leader) in local village, communication and complain mechanism, work opportunity for local people, the existence of indigenous right inside the plantation area.

2.4 Stakeholder Consultation and List of Stakeholders Contacted

2.4.1 Summary of stakeholder consultation process.

Public consultation between PT Swede Nadia and related stakeholders was conducted through the internal and external meeting, such as by interviewing community and related agencies. PT Paripurna Swakarsa has clarified some inputs from stakeholders.

2.4.2 List of stakeholder contacted

Please find appendix 3

2.5 Determining Next Visiting

The Surveillance 3 will be conducted one year after this activity (Period of January – March 2015).


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


3.0. ASSESSMENT RESULT 3.1. Summary of Assessment Report of the RSPO Certification

MUTUAGUNG LESTARI has conducted an assessment at PT Paripurna Swakarsa – Pondok Labu POM, Sime Darby

Plantation Sdn Bhd operation consisting of one (1) mill and four (4) oil palm estates.

During the assessment, there were four (4) Nonconformities were assigned against Major Compliance Indicator(s) Nine (9) nonconformity(s) were assigned against Minor Compliance Indicators four (4) nonconformance(s) against supply chain requirement for CPO mill four (4) and three (3) opportunities for improvement were identified.

Further explanation of the non-conformities raised and corrective actions taken by the company are provided in section

3.5. The company has already prepared and implemented the corrective action(s) that had been reviewed and accepted

by Auditor(s) in form of documentation evidence(s) e.g. (document record/photographic/etc...). Those corrective action(s)

taken that consist of seven (7) Major non-conformity(s) and four (4) Minor non-conformity(s) had been closed out shall

be verified during next assessment.

MUTUAGUNG LESTARI found that PT Paripurna Swakarsa – Pondok Labu POM, Sime Darby Plantation Sdn Bhd

complied with the requirements of RSPO Principles & Criteria and National Interpretation, RSPO Principles and Criteria

(P&C) for Sustainable Palm Oil Production, Republic of Indonesia - RSPO INA-NIWG, May 2008 and/or Scheme

Smallholders, October 2009*) .

Therefore, MUTUAGUNG LESTARI recommends RSPO Certification of compliance is continued and complied with

RSPO Principles and Criteria (P&C) for Sustainable Palm Oil Production, Republic of Indonesia - RSPO INA-NIWG, May

2008 and RSPO Supply Chain Certification System, November 2011; and there were subjects that the corrective action

requests shall be addressed and completed in accordance with the time frame 30 days for SCCS non compliances, 60

days for Major and next surveillance visit for Minors.

Ref Std.

VERIFICATION RESULT of MUTU-Certification

PRINCIPLE #1 COMMITMENT TO TRANSPARENCY

1.1 Plantation and Palm Oil Factory have to give adequate information for stakeholders in appropriate language and forms, to ensure the effective participation of stakeholders in decision-making.

Procedure for information request is regulated in document No. PSA/SOP.PI on 3rd July 2012. The SOP explains that the entire incoming information to operation unit will be submitted to unit manager and recorded. The regular information will be stored in line with its regular duration & information request with no time limit will be stored for 5 years. The categorization for accessible and non-accessible information by stakeholders is based on UU No.14 in 2008 regarding public information transparency.

Information request from stakeholders and response from company are recorded in log book Stakeholder. For instance, information requests and their response in 2013-2014 such as:

Sesulung Estate

Incoming letter from social, manpower and transmigration agency on 07 November 2013, letter No. 560/248/Disosnakertrans regarding the socialization of Pemenkertrans RI No. 19 in 2012 has been responded by company with a letter No. 566/098/Naker-2/2014 on 13 January 2014.

Incoming letter from mosque administrators (DKM) AL-Ikhlas Sesulung village Estate regarding the request for borrow car with driver to pick up invitees for Mohamed Birthday Commemoration (Letter No. 02/XII/DKM/AI/2013) has been responded by company with a letter No. 078/SSE-intern/I/2013 on 23 January 2013.


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


Pondok Labu Mill

In 2013-2014, there is neither information request nor the response.

Rampa Estate

Request for work from Mr. M.Padli in Rampa Cengal village, who submitted his application letter to PT. PSA and attaching his SKCK, recommendation letter from head of village, fit to work letter, SKHU, and KTP on 19 th August 2013 has been responded by company on 21st October 2013, and he start to work on 16 February 2014.

Request for work from Mr. Edy Rahman in Rampa Cengal village who submitted his application letter to PT. PSA and attaching his SKCK, recommendation letter from head of village, fit to work letter, SKHU, and KTP on 06 November 2013 has been responded by company.

Status: Comply

1.2 Management documents are publicly available, except where this is prevented by commercial confidentiality or where disclosure of information would result in negative environmental or social outcomes.

SOP for information request PSA/SOP.PI on 3 July 2012 states the categorization of document, which can be accessed or not by public. Document’s shelf life is 5 years.

Below are the accessible information by public, such as community, government and NGO (stakeholders):

1. Total area of land clearing 2. Jamsostek payment receipt 3. Personnel medical treatment payment receipt. 4. General facility for personnel 5. Data of pests and disease attack 6. Data of light and heavy equipment 7. Data of supporting machines 8. Data of implemented CSR program 9. Bridge data 10. Data of Length of road data 11. Data of workshop building 12. Data of general building 13. Data of school building 14. Type of used fertilizer 15. Type of used Agrochemical 16. Data of SKU personnel 17. Data of student

Mean while, data which can not be accessed by public, such as community, government and NGO (stakeholders):

1. Company’s financial balance 2. Company’s business strategy 3. Data which related to state confidentiality 4. Personnel’s personal data 5. Company’s permit 6. Technical SOP 7. Personnel’s medical-related data

Status: Comply

PRINCIPLE #2 COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


2.1 There is compliance with all applicable local, national and ratified international laws and regulations.

Company has fulfilled the requirement as requested by the applicable regulation by conducting the evaluation over its compliance. The evaluation take place once a year and the last one were in December 2012. Sample for compliance over the applicable regulation, such as:

- Governor of Kalimantan Selatan Decree No.188.44/0548/KUM/2011, on 28 December 2011 regarding the sector minimum wage (UMSP) in Kalimantan Selatan province.

- UU No. 1/200 regarding the ILO ratification No. 182 regarding the elimination of child labor.

- UU No. 20/1999 regarding the ILO convention – minimum age for working

- Ministry of environment Decree No, 13/1995 regarding the un-moving emission standard.

- PP 41/1999 regarding air pollution control by conducting periodic measurement for un-moving emission (boiler and generator)

- PP N0. 82/2001 regarding water quality management and water’s pollution control by periodically measuring the quality of water in well and reservoir

- UU No 5 /1960 – evaluation over compliance toward location permit and HGU permit not yet conducted, even though the HGU has been issued for Paripurna Swakarsa (PSA) area with HGU No. 137/HGU/BPN/97 = 14,892 Ha; HGU that still under process is for an area of 1,119.97 Ha (letter from land agency/ BPN Province of Kal.Sel No. 0013/9-63/I/2010, on 21st January 2010)

- PP No 40 / 1996 regarding HGU, HGB and land used title, article 7 (3) has an evidence of HGU certificate – but the compliance not yet evaluated, but there is a HGU No. HGU No. 137/HGU/BPN/97 = 14,892 Ha; and HGU that still under process is for an area of 1,119.97 Ha (letter from BPN Province of Kal.Sel No. 0013/9-63/I/2010, on 21th January 2010)

- PP 27/1999 regarding the AMDAL – has been complied and has an approval from ministry of agriculture on 30th March 1995, but company need to conform with the actual condition, where the broad, number of village and location are different from the AMDAL document (RKL/RPL)

- District Government of South Kalimantan Regulation year 2009 on genre mainstreaming in developing equivalent to UU 7/1984 regarding the elimination toward discrimination against women – not in line with the evaluation, because company should have established the female gender committee.

- Permen 04/Menaker/1980 regarding APAR installation and maintenance – the compliance plan has not been decided.

- Article 31 PP 18/1999 regarding hazardous waste management that should be sent with hazardous manifest and it compliance plan has not been decided.

Company able to present its effort to comply the applicable regulation in a form of regulation list. The latest conformation toward regulation change was conducted at the same time with compliance evaluation.

Status: Comply

2.2 The right to use the land can be demonstrated, and is not legitimately contested by local communities with demonstrable rights

Based on interview with PSD staff (Plantation Service Department) of PT. PSA, it’s known that during the Surveillance 1, there is a land conflict or tenure with surrounding community. This statement endorsed by public consultation result between audit team and committee and community in Pondok Labu, Binturung, Sesulung and Rampa village. (Refers to public consultation record in this report).

Each conflict is recorded and completed with its resolution as well as the agreement by conflicted parties. As explained in ST2 assessment , there is land claim from community in Pondok Labu and Sesulung village from 2001 to 2005. At


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


that time, community established fence in Division II & IV Pondok Labu Estate area and Division V Sesulung Estate, which stop the company activity in these location. As a resolution, there is a meeting between conflicted parties and the solution was to establish the plasma plantation scheme /KKPA by company.

For community’s land that become the HGU area of plantation, company has taken the FPIC (Free and Prior Informed Consent) mechanism as below:

1. Legal land acquisition process through location permit from Kotabaru regent in 2006 which followed by land assessment process by B committee by involving several institutions as well as representative from community.

2. Minutes of compensation meeting with local community and record over land compensation payment in a form of invoice, hand over letter and completed with photos.

3. For independent plantation before the issuance of HGU and Surveillance 2, there is an area of 65.14 Ha which actively managed by community and located inside company’s HGU area.

4. Public consultation between auditor and administrator of Sesulung, Pondok Labu, Binturung and Rampa village confirms that there is no conflict remaining over the land between company and community because the company has given the compensation.

There is a mechanism for conflict resolution in a form of conflict resolution SOP (056.PSA.PK/C12), which issued in April 2011. The SOP categorizes types of conflict (mild, medium&heavy) and temporary closes down the operation activity in conflict area that in line with recommendation from government institution and management. In line with the result of Surveillance1, there is a socialization record over this mechanism to local community. The socialization has been conformed in public consultation between auditor and local community.

Status: Comply

2.3 Use of the land for oil palm does not diminish the legal rights, or customary rights, of other users, without their free, prior and informed consent.

Based on the official letter from land agency in Kotabaru District, Province of Kalsel No. 000/03/KP-10, on 2nd September 2010 regarding the indigenous status, such as stated, so far there is no indigenous land in Kotabaru area.

In addition, based on Social Impact Assessment (SIA), there is no indigenous land that belong to community, the land only belong to personal which they have from their ancestor, trade, forest occupation, etc. for personal land has been paid by the company for the compensation and there is no coercion as stated in previous criteria 2.2.

Public consultation with the entire community in surrounding village also confirms that PT. PSA commits no violence over traditional land right or legal land right. Company has compensated the entire personal land.

Status: Comply

PRINCIPLE #3 Commitment to long-term economic and financial viability

3.1 There is an implemented management plan that aims to achieve long term economic and financial viability.

PSA is able to present the budget for 2013/2014 and projection in 2015-2018 or company’s long-range work plan for at least 3 years. This document consists the information like personnel position, building location, daily/monthly SKU wage, component of salary, fertilization history, analysis/ evaluation over FFB transportation’s requirement, plantation cost analysis, including the long range replanting. This budget document is prepared and available in each estate unit (SSE, BNE, PLE and RPE)

Example.

Yield projection/ha in work plan or budget for each estate, such as:

- BNE (2017/18) 20.39 tones/ha, (2016/17) 20.91 tones per Yield, (2015/16) 21.50 tones per ha;

- SSE (2017/18) 20.83 tones/ha, (2016/17) 21.32 tones per ha, (2015/16) 21.31 tones per ha.


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


- RPE (2017/18) 24.86 tones/ha, (2016/17) 24.44 tones per ha, (2015/16) 23.70 tones per ha, 2014/15 – 22.57 tones/ha

Company has a production summary as a work plan guidelines for period 2012/2013 until 2017/2018, with target such as:

- OER 23.75%

- FFA 5%

- Production cost 2013/14: 61.20 IDR/Tones/processing FFB, 2014/15: 64.74 IDR/Tones/processed FFB, 2015/16: 68.66 IDR/Tones/processing FFB, 2017/18: 74.07 IDR/Tones/processing FFB

- The estimation over selling price for mill is not determined,but refers to production cost as a work guidelines.

Discussion with each estate manager explains that the replanting is based on plantation SOP (Agricultural Reference Manual No. 110/EST-ARM/08). The criteria for replanting are: planting age above 20 years old, average production less than 20 tones/ha or has an average height of 15.1 meters.

Another guidelines for replanting is the Memorandum from Head of Plantation Operations (HPO) on 29 th March 2011, where the replanting was undertaken based on planting year, block (ha) and yield (tones per ha) from 2010-2011 to 2013-2014. His objective of this policy is to maintain the sustainability of FFB stock to mill. PSA has 4 estates, which have made the replanting projection (long range replanting) from 5 years, from 2015/2016 to 2029/2030. Detail of estate replanting plan are:

a. BNE started from 2015/16 b. SSE started from 2017/18 c. PLE started from 2019/20 d. RPE started from 2019/20

The replanting activity will carry out in the existing estates, which were cultivated with palm oil based on Agricultural Reference Manual and Memorandum from Head of Plantation Operations (HPO) on 29th March 2011. This replanting plan has been explained in each estate work plan document, which related to land preparation and nursery activity.

Status: Comply

PRINCIPLE #4 Use of appropriate best practices by growers and millers

4.1 Operating procedures are appropriately documented and consistently implemented and monitored.

Company has a credible procedure, which is documented, implemented and periodically monitored: daily, weekly, monthly and yearly - Agriculture Manual referenceand mill’s technical guidelines

a. Agriculture Manual reference doc 110/EST-ARM/13, endorsed on 16thSeptember 2013 by Mohd Ghozali Yahaya which regulates the preparation material, nursery technic, replanting, land preparation, harvesting density, harvesting age, field maintenance, fertilization, fertilization over un-productive plantation, empty fruit bunch application, liquid waste application, canopy management, water management for beach area, cultivation in peat land, ablasi, ripe criteria, harvesting spin, fruit collection, plantation protection, weed control, cover plantation like nut trees and rainfall record.

b. Agriculture Manual reference (Agricultural Reference Manual) 110/EST-ARM/08, Minamas Plantation, endorsed on 19thAugust 2008 by CEO (Franky Anthony). No Copy: 20.11.12, distributed on 22nd December 2008. Consist of: plantation material, nursery technic, replanting, land preparation, plantation maintenance, fertilization, fertilization over un-productive plantation, tbm fertilization by applies the empty fruit bunch, ablasi, ripe criteria, harvesting spin, fruit collection. Mean while for the applicable procedure in Labu Factory, there is one (1) document, which isproduct identification and traceability in PKS Minamas Plantation (No Policy: 501/PSA-SPC-07/12, applied from 1 July 2012). The objective of this procedure is to comply the mass balance supply chain model.

c. Mill’s technical guidelines (POD-MILL-015/IV/2007).

Periodic evaluation and monitoring over the entire estate and mill’s operation (daily, weekly, monthly and annually). The


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


monthly evaluation and monitoring is stated in Committee Meeting Management. Mean while for annual evaluation and monitoring is stated in Plantation Advisory (Estate and Mill) Visit. The field visit result is stated in visit report.

Sundian Nadaraj (Plantation Advisory) is in charge for conducting the monitoring for Sesulung Estate operation. The monitoring was conducted on 9 – 13 April 2014. Mean while, the monitoring for Rampa estate was conducted by Kenneth Sreedharan on 29 – 31 March 2013. The entire operation activity was monitored especially the production, production cost, harvesting interval, quality of product, fertilization, water management, weed control, pruning, medical check for personnel and Workshop.

Shahar Abd. Kadir (Mill advisory) is person in charge to monitor the operation of mill. The monitoring was conducted on 26 and 27 November 2013. Main issues are Boiler, sludge pit and liquid waste management, fire extinguisher and work safety.

Record over the entire mill and estate activity is well documented, such as: Afdeling daily report (estate activity), daily production report (management in mill), daily maintenance report (mill’s machines), etc.

Status: Comply

4.2 Practices maintain soil fertility at, or where possible improve soil fertility to, a level that ensures optimal and sustained yield.

The implementation of fertilization recommendation (type and doze) in each estate was based on soil analysis result (including soil type), leaf analysis, plantation age, production and weather (rainfall). Leaf sampling analysis was conducted on21 – 22 June 2012 to the entire area, which identified have a serious organic material deficiency as well as the area with specific problem. The analysis over fertilization need in 2013 – 2014 for Rampa Estate are:

a. July 2013, needs 47.05 tones borate b. September / October 2013 needs1,310.72 tones NK Blend. c. November / December 2013 needs 756.95 tones Rock Phosphate. d. January 2014 needs 445.26 tones Kieserite. e. March / April 2014 needs1.262.38 tones NK Blend.

Total recommendation for fertilizer application in Sesulung estate in 2013/2014, NK Blend (2,024,960 kg), Rock phosphate (1,019,201 kg), Kieserite (594,858 kg) and Borate (62,847 kg). Mean while the total recommendation fertilizer in Rampa estate in 2013/2014, NK blend (2,573,100 kg), Rock phosphate (756,950 kg), HGFB (47,050 kg), Kieserite (445,260 kg).

Company has allocated the budget for plantation maintenance, including the organic fertilization, un-organic fertilization, spraying, pests and disease control, etc. the non organic fertilizer application was based on recommendation from Minamas research center in 2013 – 2014. The applied fertilizers from July 2013 to June 2014 were NK Blend, kieserite, Rock phosphate and borate.

The realization of fertilization in January – February 2014 in Rampa Estate, NK blend (127,800 kg).

The objective of fertilization implementation in July – November 2013 in Rampa Estate was to cover the previous need of fertilizer (January - June 2013). The entire fertilization realization from January to June 2013 has been completed in November 2013, such as NK Blend 1,672,250 kg, Rock Phosphate 642.200 kg, Dolomite 697,350 kg, CCM44 41,950 kg, CCM25

The objective of fertilization implementation in July – October 2013 in Sesulung Estate Estate was to cover the previous need of fertilizer (January - June 2013). The entire fertilization realization from January to June 2013 has been completed in October 2013 such as NK Blend 1,523,072 kg, Rock Phosphate 896,809 kg and Dolomite 963,068 kg.

Status: Comply

4.3 Practices minimize and control erosion and degradation of soils.

PSA is able to present map of soil type, which consists of SPL 1 until SPL9 (scale 1:35,000). SPL in this case is the MM-02 soil with certain slope and certain broad. Research and Development develop this map of soil type (SPL). This map


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


has no direct linkage with marginal soil (sandy) or the actual identified mineral soil in the field.

Related to sandy and mineral type of soil, the PSA has conducted some treatments to maintain soil fertility by applying empty fruit bunch for the entire location (similar treatment for sandy and mineral type of soil). PSA present the plan (program and implementation) for empty fruit bunch application (maintenance) for period 2013 – 2014 in each block and being monitored every month.

OFI#1 (2014): it is recommended to complete or draft sandy and mineral soil map for the identified area in each estate. For instance: in SSE near Division IV SSE (heading to south) to separate the treatment and erosion or land degradation control by applying empty fruit bunch between sandy area and mineral area.

PSA palm oil plantation is able to present map for sloping area (semi-detailed topography map with a scale 1:35,000). For PSA in SSE has a varied condition compares to other areas. For SSE, there are several sloping area been identified, such as 0-3% (flat), 15-30% (hilly), 3-8% (wave), and 8-15% (heavy wave) and most of the area has 8-15% slope and the remaining 15-30% (or 184.26 ha). For the entire sloping area (4 estates), company need to minimize and control the erosion and land degradation by:

1. Hilly category: treatment/ establish terrace ring. 2. Wave and heavy wave category: by implementing rorak or silt-pit 3. Flat category (narrow): water management

Related to management strategy for marginal and critical land (sandy soil), PSA has taken some treatment such as applied empty fruit bunch for its entire plantation area and the treatment are similar between sandy soil and mineral soil. PSA able to present the plan (program and implementation) for empty fruit bunch (maintenance) for period 2013-2014 in each block and being monitored every month.

For SSE, the terrace ring establishment still under process until 2014/2015 for an area of 16,300 ha meter or 186 ha. 9,870 meters has been planned for 2013/14. For water management and rorak (silt pit) has been developed and only has maintenance activity (in line with program and implementation in 2013/2014). Maintenance activity for water management is by annually washing trench especially for 4X4 meter trench, and once every 2 years for 2 x 2 meter trench and once every 3 years for 1x 1 meter trench. Same application for RPE estate, where the land management for cultivation using the water management program.

Based on field visit in Block O-007 and N-08 (SSE) and in Block M006 (RPE), water management was carry out by establishing water gate, which sustaining the water level and keep the incoming water from the seaas well as throwing the water from river or trench to the sea. Daily monitoring over water level is conducted and recorded to ensure the treatment for sustaining water level in order to avoid land degradation or land subsiden even the leached or inundated land.

PSA is able to present its road maintenance program for 4 related estates in a form of road maintenance map in 2013-14. For instance for SSE, there are a plan for road access with 1,400 meters length, main road (45,540 meter) and collection road (153,899 meter); the realization is monitored every month, from July 2013 to June 2014 with target or budget 12 times the length of actual road. Meanwhile, the realization over road maintenance is 410,677 meter or under the finishing process that in line with road maintenance plan or flat category (narrow).

Status: Comply

4.4 Practices maintain the quality and availability of surface and ground water.

Management to sustain water quality and availability such as: signboard installation for riparian area (Buffer zone), monitoring and maintaining the riparian area, no chemical application for riparian area and gradually will be cultivated with hardwood vegetation. On field observation at Pondok Labu river in PLE, it is found the mark for riparian boundary, such as yellow paint in palm oil tree which located 50 meter from riparian area, buffer zone signboard, signboard to maintain the riparian as well as the cultivation of cemara laut vegetation. Field observation shows company’s effort to maintain the riparian area of M17 river by marking the riparian area with yellow paint as a boundary for fertilization and spraying, in addition there is also signboard in riparian area.

Company is periodically monitoring the surface water quality (river and reservoir), soil water, and liquid waste. Record over surface water monitoring in 21 locations, soil water monitoring in 3 locations and liquid waste in 1 location.


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


Implementation of periodic monitoring as stated in water examination report, monitoring well and waste pond in 2013 in PT PSA. Monitoring record for IPAL pond liquid waste quality, for instance in December 2013 in inlet pond, pond 1): pH 3,64, BOD5 34.680 mg/lit (comply the standard quality) meanwhile, for outlet pond pH 7,8 BOD5 330 mg/lt. water usage report for processing FFB and cleaning environment for period January – December 2013 is available, for instance the total water usage: 178,234 M3, processing (40,579 M3), domestic (137,665 M3), average water usage / tones FFB (1.34 M3/ton TBS)

Based on interview with head of Pondok Labu village, there is a river that being utilized by community (S. Biuku) which located in estate area and never been monitored and never been examined its quality. In addition, there is a result over water quality in RPE Div. I, Div. II, and Div. III (on 16thJan 2014), which shows one of its parameter already exceeding the quality standard that set by Permenkes 416/1990 (annex 2) and received no preventive nor currative action. Company has sent the sample of Biuku river water to laboratory in Banjarbaru. Laboratory in research center andindustrial standardization and trade received the sample on 14 March 2014. Hand over of the sample is documented and company has evaluated the result of examination reservoir at RPE Div. II, Div. III, and Div I. Company sent the improvement evidence in a form of evaluation report on 15th April 2014. NCR No. 2014 .1 is closed.

Protection over surface water quality and quantity. Monitoring and measurement over water quality in reservoir, inlet river in Division I Sesulung,and Outlet river Separe, which is passing by the mill. However, based on interview with head of pondok labu village, community using the water from river Biuku, which its has not been assessed and evaluated. Moreover, the measurement result over reservoir’s water quality in Div. I, Div. II, and Div. III (on 16th Jan 2014) shows that one of its parameter exceeded the standard threshold base on Permenkes 416/1990 (annex.2)and there is nether neither currative nor preventive actions. Major non conformance is raised. Observation 28 April 2014 Root cause: RKL and RPL recommendation matrix as well as AMDAL document not regulate the monitoring and measurement over biuku water’s quality. Corrective Action: Company sent the water sample from biuku river to examination laboratory in Banjarbaru. Examination laboratory in research center and industrial standardization and trade has accepted the sample on 14 March 2014. STB/hand over note for sample is available.Company has evaluated the examination result : - From reservoir in RPE Div.I, Div. II, and Div. III. Company sent the improvement evidence such as evaluation report

on 15 April 2014 Preventive Actions: Make a schedule for water quality examination including examination for biuku river’s water. Pointed Mr. Suprapto Isup as person in charge to conduct the evaluation over the examination report (LHU) and monitoring result. Maintain water quality in order to be in line with its natural condition and avoid pollution. Conducting socialization for personnel in order to build awareness in community to process the water properly before consumed.

Status: Comply

4.5 Pests, diseases, weeds and invasive introduced species are effectively managed using appropriate Integrated Pest Management (IPM) techniques.

Company has a mechanism for holistic pest monitoring and controlling (doc 110/EST-ARM/13 plantation protection part). Company is consistently conducting and implementing the THT program. Observation/census/detection is scheduled, in a normal condition; the census will carry out every month. In addition, cultivating the beneficial plant and pet owl starts the THT program. Company has a standard ratio for beneficial plant cultivation such as: 10 meters/ha with a composition of Casia 60%, Turnera 20%,and Antigonon leptosus 20%. Rats control by using owl and natural predator (snake)

Plantation census is an early reminder over pest and disease attack. Census over the population of fire caterpillar, termites, rats,


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


Kumbang tanduk/ horn beetle, ganoderma and tupai/squirrel. Monthly observation on regular attack. The monitored fire caterpillars are Darna trima, Ploneta diducta, Thosea vetusta, Setothosea assigna and Setora nitens.

Caterpillar census in Rampa Estate is completely presented. The census data in February 2014 over Setothosea assigna attack showed a heavy category and had exceeded the economic threshold, so it needs an intensive curative action. Mild category for fire caterpillar attack (1 – 2) in 250 ha, medium category for fire caterpillar attack (3-5 caterpillars/midrib) on 25 ha, heavy category for fire caterpillar attack (>5 caterpillars/midrib) on 29 ha. Chemical control in January 2014 was over the 228 ha area.

Caterpillar census in Sesulung Estate is completely presented. The census data in February shows a heavy Setothosea assigna attack and exceeding the economic threshold and required intensive curative actions. Heavy attack (>5 caterpillars/midrib) in Block J42, J43, K51, K52, M37, N34.

Development of beneficial plant type Antigonon leptosus, Turnera subulata and Casia cobanensis in Rampa estate is 17.93 km and consist of 0.78 km Antigonon leptosus – Data in 2013, Turnera subulata 15.72 km and Casia cobanensis 1,44 km, which spread in some collection road and main road. Meanwhile, for beneficial plant cultivation in Sesulung Estate is still under the process. The cultivation has reached 28.66 km.

Field visit in Rampa and Sesulung, massive cultivation for beneficial plant has been carried out along collection and main road.

Status: Comply

4.6 Agrochemicals are used in a way that does not endanger health or the environment. There is no prophylactic use of pesticides, except in specific situations identified in national Best Practice guidelines. Where agrochemicals are used that are categorized as World Health Organization Type 1A or 1B, or are listed by the Stockholm or Rotterdam Conventions, growers are actively seeking to identify alternatives, and this is documented.

The used agrochemical in Sesulung and Rampa estate is licensed and permitted chemical material that in line with pesticide list, which issued by pesticide commission (2012), Ministry of Agriculture. Field visit in warehouse. The agrochemical has been completed with installed MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet).

Types of used pesticide in 2013 and pesticides in Sesulung and Rampa estate warehouse are:

a. Metaprima 20 WDG and Starane 200 EC (with an activemethyl metsulfuron material). b. Prima up 480 AS (with an active glyphosate material) c. Kenlon 480 EC (with an active Triclopir material). d. Matador 25 EC (with an active Lamda sihalotrin material) e. Basta 150 EC (with an active Ammonium glifosinat material) f. Decis 25 C (with an active Delthametrin material)

The management of agrochemical has been managed (document hazardous and non-hazardous waste management); the used pesticide package should be washed, damaged and handed to licensed collector. The hazardous waste from estate should be sent to Pondok Labu Factory no more than 15 days.

But, based on field visit to Sesulung estate, its known that the agrochemical waste management not in line with the recommendation from environment agency and SOP for hazardous waste management, such as:

a. Used pesticide package waste in Sesulung estate will be kept for 11 months in estate landfill.

Company not performing periodic medical examination for spraying officer in RPE and SSE, Company shows the periodic medical examination report, which carry out in a collaboration with Prodia clinic on 14th December. Based on data’s review, there are 7 personnel with CHE (chemical) examination result above the normal threshold (4,260-11,250 U/L), for instanceMs. Sumiyati D (14,229 U/L) and Sumiati C (15,479 U/L). But until the surveillance, company not conducting evaluation for follow-up actions from personnel medical examination result. Based on interview with spraying personnel and document’s review in PRE and SSE there is no pregnant or lactating officer. Refers to non-compliance CAR No 2014. 2

Medical examination for spraying officer

Based on medical examination, there are 7 personnel with CHE (chemical) examination result above the normal


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


threshold (4,260-11,250 U/L), for instance Ms. Sumiyati D (14,229 U/L) and Sumiati C (15,479 U/L). But until the surveillance, company not conducting evaluation or follow-up actions toward these personnel. Non Compliance CAR No. 2014.02 Minor 4.6.2

Observation, April 15th 2014 Root cause: Limited monitoring on hazardous waste especially, which comes from used agrochemical packages. Corrective Actions : Waste from used pesticide package has been managed in line with recommendation from BLH and SOP for hazardous waste management, for instance the agrochemical packages in sesulung estate have been washed and damaged in bottom area before transported to licensed landfill (the evidence is documented on 1st April 2014, minutes of LB3 withdrawal and photos are available). Preventive Actions: Conducting socialization on hazardous waste management Delivering the hazardous waste based on SOP and applicable permits. Periodic transportation for hazardous waste from estate every 2 weeks.

Non Compliance CAR No. 2014.02 on indicator Minor 4.6.2 is closed

Some used pesticide package (hazardous waste) has been used for other utilities without a permit from related institution, for instance for spraying container, diesel fuel container, etc. refers non-compliance NC-2014.03. The agrochemical waste has been managed in line with recommendation from BLHD and SOP of hazardous waste management, for instance agrochemical packages in Sesulung estate were washed and damaged before being collected to licensed landfill (documented on 1st April 2014, minutes of hazardous waste hand over and photos are available).

Waste from used pesticide packages

The management for agrochemical waste is not inline with the reccomendation from environment agency and SOP for hazardouse waste mangement, such as:

a. Waste from used pesticide packages in Sesulung Estate not using 3 times washing approach and not damaged in its bottom area.

b. Utilization over used pesticide package has no permit from related agency.

Non Compliance CAR No.2014.02 on Indicator Minor 4.6.2 Observation, 15th April 2014 Root cause: Limited monitoring on hazardous waste especially, which comes from used agrochemical packages. Corrective Actions : Waste from used pesticide package has been managed in line with recommendation from BLH and SOP for hazardous waste management, for instance the agrochemical packages in sesulung estate have been washed and damaged in bottom area before transported to licensed landfill (the evidence is documented on 1st April 2014, minutes of LB3 withdrawal and photos are available). Preventive Actions: Conducting socialization on hazardous waste management Delivering the hazardous waste based on SOP and applicable permits. Periodic transportation for hazardous waste from estate every 2 weeks.

Non Compliance No.2014.02 on Indicator Minor 4.6.2 is closed.


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


Status: Comply

4.7 An occupational health and safety plan is documented, effectively communicated and implemented.

Company had a policy for occupational health and safety program, which stated in sustainable plantation management guideline No. Policy 724/TQEM-SPMS/09 on 27/8/2010. The implementation of this program, such as safety briefing including the establishment of company’s occupational health and safety structure in each estate and mill. Conducting safety briefing, and implementing the PPE. Company presents its P2K3 periodic report, which has been sent to relevant agency as part of occupational health and safety implementation. P2K3 SSE and RPE report were send on 13rd January 2014 and P2K3 Pondok Labu Factory report on 4thJan 2014. Company has identified persons in charge on occupational health and safety division, P2K3 organization structure is available in each unit and has been endorsed by relevant agency, for instance: based on social, ministry manpower and transmigration decision No. KEP-133/P2K3 /VI/DISOSNAKERTRANS on 12nd July 2012, which consist of chairman, secretary, workshop and transmigration division, environment and chemical division, preventive and curative division for handling fire, medical division/first aid, archive and documentation division and K3 enforcement division. The secretary is Mr. Suwarto, whom is not an expert on K3. Non-compliance CAR No 2014.05 P2K3 periodic meeting is done every month and being reported to Disosnakertrans, for instance:minutes of P2K3 periodic meeting in PL mill, such as minutes for meeting inDecember was conducted on 7th December 2013, regarding the evaluation toward hygienity, safety boiler, K3 and environment, PPE usage, un-safe actions, LOTO system, Electrical safety, steam hose installation and water shower. Company has registered its personnel in Jamsostek program, company able to present the Jamsostek monthly payment receipt, for instance: SLE’s Jamsostek payment receipt for period December, which paid in January 2014 through BRI Tanah Grogot with Bilyet Giro No. GFK959010, Bank Voucher No 012/I/2014 for the entire 947monthly and daily personnel. Company conducting periodic medical check-upfor high-risk personnel every year, company presents the medical examination report for spraying personnel, boiler operators, generator operators, electricity technicians and chemical warehouse personnel. For instance: high-risk personnel (spraying personnel) periodic medical examination report in RPE. The examination was carried out by Prodia clinic on 14th December 2013 for 15 personnel; types of examination are Cholinesterase and other examinations. Based on document’s review, there are 7 personnel show CHE (chemical) examination result that above normal threshold (4,260-11,250 U/L), for instance Ms. Sumiyati D (14,229 U/L) and Ms. Sumiati C (15,479 U/L). Until the surveillance, company took neither evaluation nor follow up action over this medical examination result. Non-compliance CAR No 2014. 02 HIRAC (Hazardus Identification Risk Assessment and Control)document for mill and estate explains type of work, hazard source, type of hazard, risk (E, P, R), risk control, residual risk and PIC. Company has conducting socialization for personnel and based on field visit, the entire analysis and risk identification have been installed in each station. Company has conducted training related to occupational health and safety for internal and external personnel, for instance: K3 training certificate for operator such as: certificate on behalf of Mr. Khaerul Anwar (K3 Diesel’s operator) No. Reg. 13.343-OPM.K3/PTP/IX/2013 on 2nd September 2013; certificate on behalf of Mr. Rafik Ananto (Operator for K3 Grader) No. Reg. 25371-OPK3-PAA/VIII/2013 on 30thAugust 2013; K3 certificate on behalf of Mr.Narislalang (Operator for K3 Compactor) No. Reg 25363-OPK3-PAA/VIII/2013 on 30thAugustus 2013. Based on observation and interview with RPE welders, it’s known that these welders never received training for welder and have no certificate. Non-compliance CAR No 2014.07. Company has an SOP for emergency response No. PSA/SOP.PD SOP on 1st December 2010, which explains the stages for emergency situation, such as: identifying hazard source, pointing person in charge, reporting the hazard, emergency response, conducting evacuation and taking the curative actions as well as conducting simulation for emergency situation. Company provides the P3K box, and shows that lay out for P3K boxes location in field and office building, hand over note and monitoring on P3K tools, for instance: location map for PEK in RPE consist of 11 boxes that have been stored in high-risk locations. Monitoring toward P3K boxes is conducted in monthly basis, for instance monitoring in January and February 2014 shows that number of checked tools is 11 units and all of them is available in the field. Based on field visit to spraying and harvesting location in SSE and RPE, its known that the P3K tools are available in the field and visit to WTP warehouse also known that the P3K tools area available in mill’s warehouse and are accessible any time (indoor). Non-compliance CAR No. 2014. 08. Company has conducted P3K training by involving relevant institution on 6th September 2013, company able to show training evidence, such as certificate for PEK officer like certificate on behalf of Mr. Budi, Number Ser.2480/PK3-


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


P3K/IX/2013 and certificate on behalf of Mr. Sumedi Prawira No SER.2484/PK3-P3K/IX/2013. Based on field visit and interview with P3K officer, it’s known that this officer has understood the first aid principle. Company conducting monitoring on number of work accident and number of working day’s lost. Company submits its work accident’s report to relevant agency every three months, along with P2K3 report. Based on minutes of P2K3 SLE meeting on 4th Jan 2014 in point 1, it mentions that company has conducting the evaluation and monitoring toward work accident. The evaluation was carried out by supervisor in order to decreasing the number of work accident, company also conducting fist aid awareness rising and PPE usage. SMK3 organization SSE P2K3 secretary (Mr.Suwarto) doesn’t have K3 expert certificate. Observation, April 15th 2014 Root cause: P2K3 secretary who has K3 expert certificate had been moved to another unit. Corrective Actions: There is a mutation in P2K3 SSE, where former secretary, Mr. I Made Admika (who has the K3 expert certificate) had been replaced by Mr. Suwarto, (13.2284/AK3/U/VII/2013). The DISOSNAKER Kotabaru has known the change in P2K3 structure (in line with SK no: 182/SSE-disosnakertrans/III/2014/s on 27thMarch 2014. This change has been reported and stated on latest P2K3 report. Preventive Actions: Conducting monitoring over establishment of P2K3 structure which inline with regulation. Non Compliance No.2014.02 on indicator Minor 4.7.2 is closed.

Status: Comply

4.8 All staff, workers, smallholders and contractors are appropriately trained.

Company has drafted the human resources development and training program for period 2014 for mill and estate, for instance: training for harvesting, maintenance, fertilization, spraying, fruit sortation every 4 months, fire extinguisher, pollution prevention, general K3, K3 for chemical material, K3 for electricity, K3 management and P3K certification system and 6-months P3K.

Training was recorded in order to enhance personnel’s qualification, for instance: minutes of MSDS training, P3K and best practice on spraying on 2nd October 2013 for 13 spraying personnel and P3K simulation/ training in Pondok Labu mill in May 2013, attendance sheet for 23 participants, photos and minutes of training are available.

Company has drafted the SOP for contractor’s guideline, No. PSA/SOP PKK on 1st December 2010, which endorsed by estate manager that explains requirement for contractor, such as: contractor is mandatory to use PPE, contractor’s staff should obey and comply the existing regulation, drivers must have driving license, contractor’s staff should follow the safety work regulation, and in case there is a penalty, contractor’s service contract will be reviewed. Company shows its service contract will contractor, like collective labor agreement for renting heavy equipment No. 024/RPE/SPK-LKL/X/013 on 1st October 2013.

Status: Comply

PRINCIPLE #5 Environmental responsibility and conservation of natural resources and biodiversity

5.1 Aspects of plantation and mill management, including replanting, that have environmental impacts are identified, and plans to negative impacts and promote the positive ones are made, implemented and monitored, to demonstrate continuous improvement.

PT PSA has:

1. Decision letter from head of planning bureau, secretary, secretary for capital commission, agriculture department No. 008/ANDAL/BA/II/1995 on 27thFebruary 1995 regarding the endorsement of ANDAL document for palm oil plantation and PT. Paripurna Swakarsa mill. 22,800 Ha area was covered in PT PSA ANDAL’s document, and installed mill’s capacity is 60 tones FFB/Hour in Binturung.


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


2. Decision letter from agribusiness agency, Deptan Mentan No. 047/RKL-RPL/BA/III/1995 on 30th March 1995 regarding the endorsement of PT Paripurna Swakarsa (PSA)’s RKL and RPL document.

3. RKL and RPL implementation report for Semester I in 2013 PT PSA, which been reported to BLHD Kalimantan Selatan province (accepted by Roseda), which covers the entire endorsed aspect in RKL and RPL document. The managed and monitored aspect such as: erosion, flood, vegetation and wildlife change, work opportunity and community’s economic empowerment have been stated in this report. Non-compliance NC-2011.19 and CFA-2011.20 is Closed

PT PSA has conducting periodic monitoring over dam water examination, monitoring well and waste ponds.

Status: Comply

5.2 The status of rare, threatened or endangered species and high conservation value habitats, if any, that exist in the plantation or that could be affected by plantation or mill management, shall be identified and their conservation taken into account in management plans and operations.

Identification over vegetation and wild life in PT. PSA is stated in annex 12 and 13 of High Conservation Value area assessment document (Jakarta, December 2009). Based on NKT assessment in PSA working area, there is no protected vegetation/ as stated in CITES list, mean while some area has protective, rare and endangered wildlife such as: Trenggiling peusing (Manis javanica), monkey (Macaca fascicularis), Beruk (Macaca nemestrina), Bajing Kelapa (Callosciurus notatus), Sero Ambang (Aonyx cinerea), Sigung (Mydaus javanensis), deer (Muntiacus Muntjak), Kancil (Tragulus javanicus); 7 species of bird, such as: Punai Besar (Treron capellei), Pekaka Emas (Pelargopsis capensis), Kipasan Belang ((Rhipidura javanica), Kangkareng Perut Putih (Anthrococerus albirostris), Tiung Mas (Gracula religiosa), Burung Madu Sepah Raja (Aethopyga siparaja), Pijantung Kecil (Arachnothera longirostris); and2 species of reptile, such as: kobra (Naja sp), buaya (Crocodylus spp).

Based on NKT, identification in PT. PSA working area, being identified 734.63 ha (4.93 % from total working area) andthe potency of NKT for about 1,585 ha (10.65 % from total working area) with below detail:

1. NKT 1: Rampa (23.31 ha, potency 1,044.45 ha), Pondok Labu (potency 203.87 ha), Sesulung (7.15 ha, potency 224.80 ha) and Binturung (704.17 ha, potency 112.85 ha)

2. NKT 2: Rampa (potency 813.65 ha), Pondok Labu (potency 11.43 ha) and Binturung (626.65 ha) 3. NKT 3: Rampa (23.31 ha), Sesulung (7.15 ha) and Binturung (464.63 ha) 4. NKT 4: Rampa (23.31 ha, potency 3.31 ha), Pondok Labu (potency 142.03 ha), Sesulung (potency 154.93 ha)

and Binturung (464.63 ha, potency 102.22 ha) 5. NKT 5: Binturung (25.12 ha)

Riparian area has been identified and pointed as NKT 4.2. Important ecosystem as erosion and sedimentation control. This is inline withletter from Chairman SOU-11 to Team HCV PT PSA on 9th May 2011. The revised HCV has been consulted by sending the letter, dated 4thJune 2011 to gain a response from BPN, BLHD, Kotabaru forestry agency.

Based on field visit in several locations inside Selulung and Rampa Estate, riparian area has a buffer sign as a boundary mark for chemical application and HCV signs in riparian area. The HCV 3 (endangered ecosystem) Block M009 is a swamp area influenced by tide and covered with vegetation such as: Nipah, Bakau, and Gelam. This place is habitat for crocodile and has HCV 3 signs. Observation inEstate shows that it is a hilly area that protecting water source and has a sign and covered with bushes, sungkai, and mahang vegetation in Block M009,Rampa Estate. Riparian area in Binturung area has HCV sign and the vegetation in its riparian area are Nipah, pakis, gelam and mangrove in Rampa Estate.

Status: Comply

5.3 Waste is reduced, recycled, re-used and disposed of in an environmentally and socially responsible manner.

The identified waste as hazardous waste is stored in licensed temporary landfill in Pondok Labu mill and landfill in each estate. Monitoring (balance) over hazardous waste in temporary warehouse in Pondok Labu mill in 2013, such as: used gloves, majun fiber, used oil, used pesticide packages and used chemical material package.

Based on waste identification, agrochemical waste and its package is categorized in hazardous waste and its handling


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


process should be based on SOP for hazardous waste management, such as by stating that the entire generating hazardous waste by estate and mill will temporarily be stored in licensed hazardous landfill before trade.

Monitoring record/ waste analysis is available, for instance: hazardous waste balance. This balance informs the incoming waste, the out going waste or utilized waste. Identification over waste sources and its management is available, and inform such as: waste source, waste code, name of waste, type of waste, classification, reuse/recycle/disposal, warehouse and final destination. Waste documentation can be seen in delivery minutes, hand over note, and waste balance. For instance: hazardous waste balance in licensed hazardous waste landfill (Pondok Labu mill) in October- December 2013.

Waste Management

Field verification in waste water installation (IPAL) in Pondok Labu mill shows a waste leakage, which comes from mill’s activity, such as: a) Liquid waste leakage from land application pump toward trench and water’s conduit.

Liquid waste leakage from domestic waste reservoir to trench and estate as well as wate’s conduit. Visit to personnel housing shows the organic and non-organic domestic waste have not been maanged inline woth sop for non-hazardous waste management (burned and not sent to landfill)

Company is not able to present the evidance of hazardous waste disposal that inline with the applicable regulation especially PP 18 in 1999. Non Compliance CAR No. 2014.09 on indicator Major 5.3.2 Observation, 04th 2014 Root cause:

Limited monitoring toward waste ponds

Person in charge in the field not fully understands the maintenance for domestic waste ponds.

Currative action: There is an improvement over pump and establishing trap for reservoir. There is an improvement in reservoir pond to store domestic, Conducting the socialization for waste disposal and ban waste burn in housing location. Make a schedule for waste disposal to landfill (photos are available) Preventive Actions: Maximize the monitoring activity over waste ponds Consistently manage the domestic waste disposal. Non Compliance No. 2014.09 on indicator Major 5.3.2 is closed.

Status: Comply

5.4 Efficiency of energy use and use of renewable energy is maximized.

Diesel fuel saving over shell and fiber usage in 2013 are:

• Total diesel fuel usage for generator: 230,959 Liter

• Total shell usage: 27,368,790 kg

• Total fiber usage: 21,359, 380 kg

• Average efficiency over diesel fuel usage for generator 2.62 Liter/Kwh

• Average efficiency over shell usage.125 kg/Kwh

• Rata average efficiency over fiber usage: 4.30 kg/Kwh

Monitoring data over diesel fuel usage, for instance: diesel fuel total usage (Jan2013 – Jan2014)for generator diesel: 230,959 Liters, Total Kwh generator Diesel: 604,500 Kwh up to average efficiency of generator diesel fuel: 2.62 Liter/Kwh


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


Status: Comply

5.5 Use of fire for waste disposal and for preparing land for replanting is avoided except in specific situations, as identified in the ASEAN guidelines or other regional best practice.

Company has the Manual Reference for Agronomy No. 110/EST-ARM/08, Part 4 land clearing clause 3.1-point (b) states that land clearing should be based on decision letter from director general of plantation No. KB.110/SK/DJ BUN/05.95 on 30th May 1995 regarding the technical guideline for land clearing without burning (zero burning).

Company has SOP for fire management for palm oil plantation and its surrounding (Document No. PM 0800). There is a minutes of simulation over fire management for the entire SOU 12 Pondok Labu, which has been done on 21st December 2013 that consist of 7 PLF extinguisher personnel, 5 SSE personnel and 7 RPE personnel. Minutes of simulation, simulation result, the evaluation, photos and attendance sheet are available. Company presents unit report for PT PSA estate, which inform the undertaken activity for land clearing with Zero Burning

There is an inventory list for fire extinguisher tools in RPE and SSE in 2014, which consist of 1 unit extinguisher machine, apron fire hose+nozle 5 roll, spiral hose 1 pcs, fire proof clothes 15pcs, fire proof boots 15 pcs, gloves 15 pcs, glasses 10 pcs, mask 10 pcs, helmet 15 pcs, soklay bulb and stick 1 pcs, machete 5, shovel 3, hoe 3, bucket 5 and APAR.

Status: Comply

5.6 Plans to reduce pollution and emissions, including greenhouse gases, are developed, implemented and monitored.

Identification over pollution and emission source in estate and mill is stated in GRK emission inventory and projection procedure (No. Policy: 700/PSQM-GRK-01/12). Source of pollution and emission from estate, such as: change the plantation covers, fertilization application, cultivation in peat area, the usage of fossil (diesel) fuel for operating generator, and heavy equipment. FFB transportation activity. Mean while emission source from mill such as: diesel fuel usage for operating the generator, boiler activity, electricity usage, kernel separation process, liquid waste disposal (POME),and CPO transportation to bulking/refinery.

From identified pollution and emission source, company has conducting periodic monitoring toward emission quality every 6 months. The evaluation over emission quality was conducted by HYPERKES center Banjarmasin with examination parameter: NO2, SO2, CO, weather, speed of wind, TSP-dust, noise.

Based on latest evaluation on26 September 2013, its known that the emission quality in Pondok Labu mill is in line with environment standard threshold, for instance: NO2 17,69 μg/Nm3 (BM 5,600 μg/Nm3); SO2 4.39 μg/Nm3 (BM 5,200 μg/Nm3); CO 69.8 μg/Nm3 (BM 29,000 μg/Nm3); TSP-dust 11.95 μg/Nm3 (BM 10,000 μg/Nm3); noise 43.5 dBA (85 dBA); temperature 31.20C; RH 61%; Speed of Wind 0.36 – 0.74 m/det2. Optimizing the usage of shell and fiber as fuel for Boiler, as well as conducting periodic un-moving emission examination every 6 months are the effort and plan to reduce pollution and emission in Pondok Labu mil.

Monitoring record over liquid waste quality in IPAL pond such as: sample in December 2013 in inlet pond No. 1 pH 3.64 BOD5 34,680 mg/lit (comply the standard threshold) mean while for outlet pond pH 7.8 BOD5 330 mg/litliquid waste application from mill to plantation area is appropriate and is not polluting. This condition shows that mill’s liquid waste management using the effective wastewater management installation.

Waste Management

Field verification in waste water installation (IPAL) in Pondok Labu mill shows a waste leakage, which comes from mill’s activity, such as: b) Liquid waste leakage from land application pump toward trench and water’s conduit.

Liquid waste leakage from domestic waste reservoir to trench and estate as well as wate’s conduit. Visit to personnel housing shows the organic and un-organic domestic waste have not been maanged inline woth sop for non-hazardous waste management (burned and not sent to landfill)

Company not able to present the evidance of hazardous waste disposal that inline with the applicable regulation


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


especially PP 18 in 1999. Non Compliance CAR No. 2014.09 on indicator Major 5.6.2 Observation, 04th 2014 Root cause:



Currative action: There is an improvement over pump and establishing trap for reservoir. There is an improvement in reservoir pond to store domestic, Conducting the socialization for waste disposal and ban waste burn in housing location. Make a schedule for waste disposal to landfill (photos are available) Preventive Actions: Maximize the monitoring activity over waste ponds Consistently manage the domestic waste disposal. Non Compliance No. 2014.09 on indicator Major 5.6.2 is closed.

Status: Comply

PRINCIPLE #6 Responsible consideration of employees and of individuals and communities affected by growers and mills

6.1 Aspects of plantation and mill management, including replanting, that have social impacts are identified in a participatory way, and plans to mitigate the negative impacts and promote the positive ones are made, implemented and monitored, to demonstrate the continuous improvement.

Company has conducted the analysis over positive and negative impact from plantation activity, such as:

1) Environment impact analysis (AMDAL) for PT Paripurna Swakarsa (PSA), which has been endorsed by agriculture department on 27th February 1995. This documents states the positive and negative impact on social environment that will be managed and monitored by company.

2) Social Impact Assessment report, which conducted in collaboration with third party in 2010 that produce some recommendation for managing the social impact.

As an evidence for environment management and monitoring, company has had the implementation of environment management and monitoring report which drafter and reported to relevant institution. However, the RKL-RPL implementation documents doesn’t contain an information whether this process carried out with a participatory way or not, to reduce community restlessness, such as: the absence of plasma plantation scheme in Rampa village, land ownership after replanting activity in pondok Labu village and restlessness over pollution due to plantation’s activity in Rama village (NCR 2014.10). As a compliance toward standard indicator 6.1.2., company needs to show the evidence that the social impact has been participatory managed and monitored as required by AMDAL document.

Based on verification over plantation and industrial business specification duringS2 surveillance, it’s known that there is no significant change in scope of AMDAL document. Moreover, there is no need to revise the RKL and RPL document. The implementation report over environment management and monitoring has been periodically reported to relevant institution with a certain schedule. Copy of RKL/RPL implementation report in Semester 1 2013 and delivery note to relevant institution are available. Report for semester 2 in 2013 is under drafting process. Detail explanation can be seen in indicator 5.1.2.

As a commitment toward community empowerment, company has build the plasma plantation scheme in Binturung, Sesulung and Pondok Labu village, which include on KKPA Sungai Cengal management. In general, number of involving smallholders are 870 household with detail: Bintarung village = 260 household, Pondok Labu village = 272 household and Sesulung village = 338 household. Realization report over the development of plasma plantation scheme is available in KKPA – ASC (Area Sungai Cengal) with total an area of 1,249.53 hectares.

Status: Status: Non Compliance on indicator Minor 6.1.1


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


6.2 There are open and transparent methods for communication and consultation between growers and/or millers, local communities and other affected or interested parties.

Company has SOP for communication and consultation (PSA/SOP DK), on 11st April 2011. This procedure contains;

Scope of SOP such as personnel & community,

Types of communication,

Consultation recording process,

Consultation facility

In addition, there is an SOP for conflict resolution with community on 09th April 2011, such as:

Community submit their complain to company,

Head of division records the complain and submit it to Manager

Manager gives responses to community or refers the complain to head of department

If Head of Departmentapproves, then he/she will give the responses to manager for followed by deliver the response to community.

Company has presented the stakeholders list, which covers 4 (four) community leader in village and sub district, 9 (nine) Pamong Desa and sub district, 17 government institution in sub district, 3 (three) and 8 (eight) institution in national level (Jakarta), company near the plantation area, local NGO like LSM Lamas, Gasak, Anak kaki gunung Sebatung as well as 23 vendors/ institutions. Person in charge for consultation and communication with community is head of division (Kasie) in each division

Record over community’s aspiration and follow-up actions from company is stated in logbook stakeholders for period 2013-2014:

Sesulung Estate

Registration on incoming letter from social, manpower and transmigration agency on 07th November 2013, letter No. 560/248/Disosnakertrans regarding the socialization for Pemenkertrans RI No. 19 in 2012 has been responded by company with a letter No. 566/098/Naker-2/2014 on 13rd January 2014.

Incoming letter from mosque administrator/ Dewan kemakmuran masjid (DKM) AL-Ikhlas Sesulung village Estate regarding the request to borrow company’s vehicle and driver to pickup invitees for Mohamed birthday commemoration (letter No. 02/XII/DKM/AI/2013) has been responded - by lending the vehicle and driver- with a letter No. 078/SSE-intern/I/2013 on 23rd January 2013.

Pondok Labu mill

In 2013-2014 there is no information request and response.

Rampa Estate

Employment request from Mr. M.Padli in Rampa Cengal village.Mr. M.Padli submitted an application to PT. PSA by attaching his SKCK, recommendation letter from head of village, fit to work letter, SKHU, and national identity cardon 19th August 2013, which has been responded by company on 21 October 2013, and already star to work on 16th February 2014.

Employment request from Mr.Edy Rahman in Rampa Cengal village.Mr.Edy Rahman submitted an application to PT. PSA by attaching his SKCK, recommendation letter from head of village, fit to work letter, SKHU, and national identity card on 06th November 2013,which has been responded by company.

Status: Non Compliance on indicator Minor 6.1.2

6.3 There is a mutually agreed and documented system for dealing with complaints and grievances, which is implemented and accepted by all parties.

Similar to previous surveillance result, company has had the SOP for managing community’s complain, which has been revised (document no. PSA/SOP MPK, revision 01), the revised SOP for communication and consultation (document no. PSA/SOP DK, revision 01), and SOP for conflict resolution (document no. 056.PSA.PK/C12). Company has


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


socialized some procedures to stakeholders as presented in minutes of socialization, attendance sheet and photos in 2013.

Based on confirmation from village administrator in surrounding plantation area, such as: Sesulung, Rampa, Binturung and Pondok Labu village, its known that company using the dialogue and discussion mechanism to solve the conflict with community like stated on conflict resolution document over conflict in Pondok Labu and Sesulung village in 2005.

Similar to previous surveillance result, there is an SOP for land compensation standard and identification (001/PSD-L&AS) on 3rd June 2011, which covers information on land compensation steps and calculation that inline with government regulation in Kota baru district; Related to compensation calculation, company able to present the records, such as: a). Invoice, b). Land release letter, which completed with persil map over the released land.

SOP for handling complain from community (PSA/SOP MPK, revision 01 on 1st December 2010), SOP for communication and consultation (PSA/SOP DK, revision 01 on 11th April 2011). SOP for conflict resolution (056.PSA.PK/C12) on 09th April 2011. There is a record over personnel complaints for period 2013, such as:

Additional time for electivity activation in SSE housing for 1 hour from Sunday to Friday in the morning at 03.00 Wita until 05.45 Wita and in the afternoon from 18.00 wita to23.00 Wita. Mean while on Saturday in the morning at 03.00 Wita until 06.00 Wita and in the afternoon from 18.00 Wita to 24.00 Wita (on 8 July 2013). Has been approved by company on 9th July 2013.

Based on interview with personnel in Div. 1 SSE, the request over roof (iron sheeting) to repair the broken roof has been responded and granted by company.

Status: Comply

6.4 Any negotiations concerning compensation for loss of legal or customary rights are dealt with through a documented system that enables indigenous peoples, local communities and other stakeholders to express their views through their own representative institutions.

Comply the result from previous surveillance, company has had the procedure for identification and calculating land compensation toward legal right and traditional right, which is the SOP for land compensation identification and standard (001/PSD-L&AS) on 3rd June 2011, which drafted by PSD and is inline with the standard of land compensation issued by government of Kotabaru district.

Company presents the identification record for stakeholders who receive the land compensation, such as:

1) Minutes of assessment bycommittee “B” over HGU process, which indicate the community’s land inside the requested area for HGU.

2) Minutes of land compensation discussion to find out stakeholders who receive the land compensation and how much did it cost.

Inline with previous surveillance result, there is an evidence for negotiation process over land release in a form of minutes of land compensation discussion in village level in order to figure out stakeholders who receive the land compensation and how much did it cost. For individual land, there is a record of land release agreement, which has been agreed by both parties, for instance: land compensation document on behalf of Mr. Hasar Hindi on 8th January 2009 with a compensation amount IDR 20,000,000, -.

Based on document’s verification, the entire land compensations for PT. PSA have been done in 2009. Land compensation documents over smallholder land inside the HGU area are complete and store in the office, for instance: compensation payment request from management to management in Jakarta office, land compensation agreement that signed by both parties and endorsed by head of village, owner’s national identity card, invoice, photos. Based on confirmation with Pondok Labu, Binturung, Sesulung and Rampa village administrator, it is known that the land compensations have been done (please refers to public consultation record).

Status: Comply

6.5 Pay and conditions for employees and for employees of contractors always meet at least legal or industry


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


minimum standards and are sufficient to provide decent living wages.

Company has drafted the SOP for contractor service agreement, document no. PSA/SOP PKK on 1st December 2010 that has been approved by estate manager. The company presents the service agreement with contractor, for instance: service agreement for heavy equipment rental No. 024/RPE/SPK-LKL/X/013 on 1st October 2013, on behalf of CV Mandiri Putra Pratama, the service agreement also explains the right and responsibility that should be fulfilled by the contractor.

Status: Comply

6.6 The employer respects the right of all personnel to form and join trade unions of their choice and to bargain collectively. Where the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining are restricted under law, the employer facilitates parallel means of independent and free association and bargaining for all such personnel.

Personnel salary is based on decision letter from governor of Kalimantan Selatan No. 188.44/0595/KUM/2013 regarding the sector minimum wagein Kalimantan Selatan province in 2014. Personnel main salary is IDR 1,675,000, -. This decision letter comes into effect from 1st January 2014 to 31stDecember 2014.

Moreover, based on memorandum from HRM general managernumber 037/HRM-i3/II/2014 on 3rd February 2014 regarding the SKU daily salary and SKU monthly salary structure in 2014 for Kalimantan Selatan with total main salary IDR 1,675,000, -. The salary calculation covers Sunday and national holiday and applies for SKU daily and SKU monthly salary. The adjustment (increase) over daily and monthly salary start into effect on 1st January 2014.

Collective labor agreement (PKB) Period 2012-2014 has been approved by ministry of manpower and transmigration R.I, Directorate General of Industrial Coaching Relationship and Labor Social Assurance with a letter no: B.98/PHIJSK-PKKAD/PP&PKB/VI/2012 (on 19th June 2012).

Company provides facility and infrastructure for personnel, such as housing, personnel’s hall, mosque, child care, church, polyclinic, soccer field etc. water comes from reservoir, mean while for electivity comes from generator.

Company supports the establishment of worker union as stated in collective labor agreement (2013-2015), which explains company’s acknowledgement over worker union (Chapter II Article 5). There is a registration over worker union, number: 568/095/SP/DISSOSNAKERTRANS on 27 Sept 2012 on behalf of worker union SSE mandiri.

Company presents the evidence of meeting with personnel, such as invitation letter and minutes of collective labor agreement meeting for SKU ASD and Pamukan Area (Panel of collective labor agreement SKU ASD and Pamukan Area) on 3-4 July 2013.

Status: Comply

6.7 Children are not employed or exploited. Work by children is acceptable on family farms, under adult supervision, and when not interfering with education program. Children are not exposed to hazardous working conditions.

Company has a commitment toward personnel’s age requirement. Company sets the minimum age for hiring is at least 18 years old which inline with child protection policy (Child Protection Policy-the CPP) No. POD-UM-052/III/2010.

Collective labor agreement in 2012-2014 chapters IV. Work relation, article 16. Recruitment, point 1.2 regarding the mandatory age requirement that should be fulfilled by applicant, such as:

a. Indonesian b. Minimum 18 years old when hired or have been married c. Physically and mentally fit to work

Based on document’s review (List of employee in December 2013) the youngest officer in Rampa Estate is 19 years old named Mr. Ricky Andrianto, date of birth 8th October 1994, work as a mechanic since 1st July 2013. Mean while for Sesulung Estate, the youngest officer is Mr. Tri Wahyu Pambudi, age 20 years old, date of birth 10th November 1993.


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


Based on field visit in Sesulung and Rampa village, there are no personnel under 18 years old.

Status: Comply

6.8 Any form of discrimination based on race, caste, national origin, religion, disability, gender, sexual orientation, union membership, political affiliation, or age, is prohibited.

Policy as guidelines for sustainable plantation that issued by Minamas Plantation Indonesia (No. Policy: 724/TQEM-SPMS/09) page 13, on 27th August 2010, covers company’s regulation on fair treatment for recruitment, which stated in point 1: the entire personnel should be fairly and normally treated regarding to recruitment, promotion, work description and condition with no discrimination against race, ethnicity, social status, nationality, gender, skin color, disability, sexual orientation, membership, political view, religion and age. Based on personnel list at PT Paripurna Swakarsa in 2013. Number of personnel are 2160. Personnel come from different ethnicity, religion and origin. (Java, Timor, Dayan, Makassar, Sundae, Banjar, Manado, Tator etc)

Status: Comply

6.9 Policy to prevent sexual harassment and all other forms of violence against women and to protect their reproductive rights is developed and applied.

Guidelines for gender policy is stated indocument No. Policy 701/TQEM-ESH/10 by Minamas Plantation on 27th August 2010. This social policymentions that personnel should be fairly and normally treated regarding to recruitment, promotion, work description and condition with no discrimination against race, ethnicity, social status, nationality, gender, skin color, disability, sexual orientation, membership, political view, religion and age. The existing complain procedure is:

1. Reporter or victim submit the complain registration form to gender committee 2. Conducting early investigations, taking a photo of the location, fill and review the report, clarify the event,

collecting witnesses (if there is witness) and document, clarify the event and report to gendercommittee. 3. Head of gender committee will establish investigation team. 4. Report of the investigation result should be handed to victim, reporter and related parties no more than 5 days

after the investigation. 5. The investigation report consists of detail event, background and chronology, fact-findings. 6. If the evidence of sexual harassment is objectiveand sufficient, then the manager will took a disciplinary actions

toward perpetrator

Company has conducted the socialization of gender committee for Rampa estate, such as:

1. Posyandu examination on 29th November 2013 division I, II and III. 2. Holy Koran reading activity (yasinan) on 8 December and23 December 2013.

Based on interview with harvesting officer in block M 16-17 Div. 1 Rampa estate and fertilization foremanin Block S47 Div. 1 SSE, so far there is no complaint regarding inappropriate behavior or sexual harassment in working place.

Company has a policy to protect reproductive right, which based on collective labor agreement in 2012 – 2014, Chapter VII Article 33 point 1 that female personnel have a right to rest and earn full salary even they took 1.5 months leave before the labor and 1,5 months after labor, which based on physician/ midwives’ examination. Female personnel, who experience miscarriage (supported with letter from physician) also has a right to take 1.5 months leave and entitle for full salary. For lactating personnel, company offers dispensation to breast feed their children in office with an approval from their supervisor.

Based on interview with harvesting personnel in Block M 16-17 Div. 1 Rampa estate and Block S047 SSE fertilization foreman. Leave request for 1 years is 12 days, H1 every 2 days each month and H2 for 1,5 months before and after labor based on physician / midwives examination. More over, there is H1 monitoring for period of January until December 2013, which states name, gender, age, division and remarks. In addition, the is an attendance sheet in each division which hold by fertilization foreman and attached the pregnancy leave description from policlinic paramedic on behalf of Ms. Endah, age 31 years old in division 2 Rampa estate.

Status: Comply


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


6.10 Growers and mills deal fairly and transparently with smallholders and other local businesses.

PT Paripurna Swakarsa (PSA) has a collective labor agreement with cooperative Bina Swadaya Karya (BSK) for plasma plantation scheme’s development and management/ Plasma or KKPA Sungai Cengal. The agreement was signed on 11 August 2008 and valid until the plantation reach age 25 years old or 30 years old. The plantation area belongs to the community/ member of cooperative BSK, which will be managed by the nucleus plantation or PSA (located at KKPA in Binturung Estates). Broad of KKPA-plasma nucleusis approximately 1,750 ha in Kota baru, Kalsel province and has been cultivated since 2008 and about 96 ha already produce FFBand send to mill; in the agreement, both parties agree to managed the plantation in line with their responsibility and right.

The agreement also regulates that the entire production will be bought by PSA with an appropriate price as set by government and agreed by both parties (cooperative and PSA)

The administrator of KKPA-Plasma nucleus of cengal river able to present the agreed price which set by local plantation agency in Kalimantan Selatan Province by using the discussion mechanism and known by several parties and completed with minutes of discussion among KKPA smallholders, independent smallholder and other parties including the local plantation agency. For instance: FFB price in Sept 2013 was IDR 1,060 (for 3 years old plantation) and IDR 1,448 (for 13 years old plantation).

Collective labor agreement between cooperative Bina Swadaya Karya (BSK) and PT Paripurna Swakarsa (PSA) regulates the mechanism where the PSA is mandatory to report the realization of palm oil plantation development every semester; and the payment for production has been regulated in decision letter from general director ofplantation No. 29/KB.03/SK/DJ-BUN/04/93 on 7 April 1993 regarding the technical guidelines for set the abstraction (rendement) and quality control as well as the mechanism for selling and purchasing the production. This agreement also regulates the handover of income generating from production to member every 3 months after deducted by debt and its interest, maintenance cost including harvesting cost, transportation and indirect cost.

Based on interview with KKPA Cengal river, it is explained and presented that the documentation on plasma plantation scheme management consists of production activity, production cost and deb to KKPA. At present, KKPA Cengal river does not have payment of palm oil production that paid directly to member because the calculation of production cost still higher than the income generation, but the FFB that has been sent to mill always recorded and reported to cooperative member.

Status: Comply

6.11 Growers and millers contribute to local sustainable development wherever appropriate.

Documentation over company’s commitment on the realizationof social and environment responsibility, such as:

1. Record over the plasma plantation scheme development with numbers of plasma smallholders in Bintarung village are 260 households, Pondok Labu village are 272 households and in Sesulung village are 338 households with an area of 1,249.53 hectare. Nevertheless, there is one village, which has not get the plasma plantation scheme – rampa village – because there is no area that can be developed in this village. More over, communities in Rampa village are fisherman and entrepreneur and only few people in this village understand about plantation/ agriculture. Company needs to consider other type of empowerments for people in Rampa village.

2. Company’s contribution toward local facility and infrastructure, such as: road maintenance and improvement through providing heavy equipment, establishing village hall in Sesulung village, establishing junior high school building for personnel and local community, providing facility for transportation school buses) for personnel and student.

3. Contribution toward local economic empowerment by involving the entire local business as contractors and some local purchase like purchasing rice from local trader and purchasing fisheries product form local fisherman’s in surrounding villages like Sesulung and Rampa village.

4. Documentation over CSR disbursement such as: providing meat on idul adha celebration, budget assistance to support village operation cost amount IDR 600,000/ months, rice allowance for elderly people in each village, and grant assistance for religious and social activity, etc.


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


5. Recruitment for local people especially for sesulung village because majority of community in this village are working for company.

Building tax payment receipt (PBB), income tax (PPh), additional value tax (PPN) and other responsibility, which set by local government.

Status: Comply

PRINCIPLE #7 Responsible development of new plantings

7.1 A comprehensive and participatory independent social and environmental assessment is undertaken prior to establishing new plantings or operations, or expanding existing ones, and the results incorporated into planning, management and operations.

At present, there is no additional plantation development in PT PSA area. Basedon review over area’s statement document, field visit and information from management, it is known that the youngest plantation is the one that cultivated in 2009. Mean while for palm oil trees that are cultivated in 2010/2011 is part of utilization for previous land clearing (previously to build mill) with an area of 80 ha. Where 67 ha has been cultivated with palm oil in Binturung Estate. 80 ha from this area has been cleared in 2005 in order to improve palm oil mill’s capacity, but this plan was cancelled and replace with nursery activity, housing and palm oil plantation for an area of 67 Ha. Based on this explanation, the social and environment impact analysis is not required anymore.

Status: Not Applicable

7.2 Soil surveys and topographic information are used for site planning in the establishment of new plantings, and the results are incorporated into plans and operations.

During the audit (January 2013), there is neither new plantation development nor replanting in PT PSA area.PT PSA has had the soil type map and topography map for plantation operation’s area.


7.3 New plantings since November 2005, have not replaced primary forest or any area required to maintain or enhance one or more High Conservation Values.

During the audit (January 2013), there is neither new plantation development nor replanting in PT PSA area.PT PSA has had the soil type map and topography map for plantation operation’s area.

Status: Comply

7.4 Extensive planting on steep terrain, and/or on marginal and fragile soils, is avoided.

Based on identification result over the high conservation value area and field visit, there is no new cultivation since November 2005 in primary forest area or in each estate that is required to improve and maintain the the high conservation value area.


7.5 No new plantings are established on local peoples’ land without their free, prior and informed consent, dealt with through a documented system that enables indigenous peoples, local communities and other stakeholders to express their views through their own representative institutions.

Neither new plantation development nor replanting activity in PT PSA area. So there is no over cultivationin marginal land for new plantation



ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


7.6 Local people are compensated for any agreed land acquisitions and relinquishment of rights, subject to their free, prior and informed consent and negotiated agreements.



7.7 Use of fire in the preparation of new plantings is avoided other than in specific situations, as identified in the ASEAN guidelines or other regional best practice.



PRINCIPLE #8 Commitment to continuous improvement in key areas of activity

8.1 Growers and millers regularly monitor and review their activities and develop and implement action plans that allow demonstrable continuous improvement in key operations.

Summary of social impact analysis and realization plan in 2011 – 2013 contains the description for social impact plan and realization on 1 May 2011, which based on priority. Follow-up priority from the social impact analysis such as: 1). Providing education facilities, 2). Construction road for village, 3). Local economic empowerment, 4). Employment/ recruitment for local people.

Company has had annual internal audit to ensure the consistence of RSPO standard implementationon mill and estate operationfor sustainable improvement. Company also presents improvement report toward internal auditor’s findings.

Status: Comply


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


3.2. Summary of Assessment Report of Supply Chain

Clause (Module D) CPO Mills - Segregation Requirements

1 Documented Procedures

1.1

The facility shall have written procedures and/or work instructions to ensure the implementation of all the elements specified in these requirements. This shall include at minimum the following:

a) Complete and up to date procedures covering the implementation of all the elements in these requirements.

b) The name of the person having overall responsibility for and authority over the implementation of these requirements and compliance with all applicable requirements. This person shall be able to demonstrate awareness of the facilities procedures for the implementation of this standard.

Interview with Mr. Suprapto (As PSQM) and Mr. Haryanto (Head of administration division).

There is no change on the SOP, related to SCCS No. Policy: RSPO/65/SCPP/PSA, Rev. 01, dated 29 thJanuary 2013) and refers to the standard of SCCS RSPO Supply Chain Certification Standard, Final Document November 25 th, 2011. Person in charge is stated in part 5, person in charge is Factory Manager, Assistant PSQM, foreman/ Lab assistant, As/ Sr. As/ Bulking manager with duties and responsibility for SCCS

Status: Comply

1.2

The facility shall have documented procedures for receiving and processing certified and non-certified FFBs.

Procedure 6.1. Raw material and product identification, consist of:

1. Raw material identification (delivery note, FFB check in the mil)

2. Mill’s product identification PKS (shell, fiber, palm kernel and CPO)

Product traceability also regulated in documented procedure (the certified FFB should be handled differently, from production line – from sterilizer to reservoir and bulking – covers a process of: fruit quality assessment, sterilization process record, production process in press and cyclone process, nut station, clarification, CPO dispatch from mill to Bulking station. Bulking station in Sekumbang village, Bakau sub district, Pamukan Utara district, Kalimantan Selatan, Palm Kernel delivery toBulkingstation (in Sungai Durian village, S Durian Kota Baru district, Kalimantan Selatan), CPO storage especially PSA (2 reservoirs in Bulking station (separated between certified reservoir and non-certified reservoir), CPO dispatch to buyer.

Mill presents evidence related to certified and non-certified FFB’s accepting and processing, such as:

- Hand over note (SPB), mark with CERTIFIED stamp and NON-CERTIFIED stamp, for instance: on 15 Jan 2014 from SSE amount 2,000 Kg (Certified FFB) and KKPA .S Cengal (non certified FFB) amount 3,377 kg

- Daily production report, from accepting FFB, processing and CPO. For instance on 26 Feb 2014, the certified FFB amount 1,045,590 kg and for non-certified is not processed, for generating CPO amount 245,660 kg and none for non-certified CPO.

Sustainable FFB, CPO and Kernel report and record is made on a monthly basis and can be summarized into 3-months report. The certified and non-certified product will be separated in the form.

Status: Comply

2 Purchasing and goods in

2.1


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


The facility shall verify and document the volumes of certified and non-certified FFBs received.

PSA from 1 July 2013 to Feb 2014 accepting fruit from nucleus plantation (certified) amount 161,021 Tones and fromJan to Feb 2014 accepting fruit from non-nucleus source (KKPA or non-certified) amount 89 Ton. Both FFB are accepted and separately recorded by using RSPO CERTIFIED and RSPO NON CERTIFIED stamps on the weight bridge form and delivery note. For instance: certified FFB on 27 Feb 2014 amount 10.870 Tones from SSE Block T004; and non-certified FFB acceptance on 25 Feb 2014 amount 2,292 Tones from KKPA-ASC Div. IV Block F050.

Status: Comply

2.2

The facility shall inform the CB immediately if there is a projected overproduction.

PKS from Jan to Des 2013 generating CPO for amount 55,789.695 Tones and in Feb 2014 amount 66,166.384 Tones from certified CPO amount 76,360.93 Tones or still under the claimed product

Status: Comply

3 Record keeping

3.1

The facility shall maintain accurate, complete, up-to-date and accessible records and reports covering all aspects of these requirements.

The entire documents related to certified and non-certified FFB acceptance, production process up to CPO dispatch to Bulking station is recorded and stored in daily report archive in mill’s office. Mill’s able to present the record and documentation for previous year, in 2012, 2013 until Feb 2014 in an updated condition.

Status: Comply

3.2 Retention times for all records and reports shall be at least five (5) years.

Mill’s able to present the record for certified and non-certified FFB acceptance, production process up to CPO dispatch to Bulking stationfor previous year, in 2012, 2013 until Feb 2014 in an updated condition and are stored at least for 5 years (inline with annex -5 regarding the declaration inprocedure SCCS RSPO/65/SCPP/PSA rev 01 on 29th Jan 2013 page 18).

Status: Comply

3.3 The facility shall record and balance all receipts of RSPO certified FFB and deliveries of RSPO certified CPO, PKO and palm kernel meal on a three-monthly basis.

PKS presents the record and balance for the entire certified and non-certified FFB, CPO and Kernel production and its monthly delivery, which can be summarized in 3 months report. This data can be presented for period Jan 2013 until Feb 2014.

Status: Comply

3.4 The following trade names should be used and specified in relevant documents, e.g. purchase and sales contracts, e.g. *product name*/MB or Mass Balance. The supply chain model used should be clearly indicated.

PSA since January until the S2 surveillance (Feb 2014) accepting non-certified fruit from plasma for amount 89 Tones and process it into CPO for about 20 Tones. The certified and non-certified FFB was accepted and processed together and no separation on its production process (loading ramp to CPO). This condition shows that there is no segregation on the process. This condition influences the segregation claim that set in the SCCS procedure, where the CPO was claimed as Mass Balance product (not SG) and sales document or contract still indicates the SG supply chain model.

For instance:

- Sales Contract on 2nd Jan 2014 No. 0310/PSA/KTR-MKS/LOK/I/2104, is stamped with RSPO Certified Segregation and

- Invoices on 8th Jan 2014 No. 0539/PSA/I/2014 is stamped with RSPO Certified Segregation.


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


- Tax receipt 0070.0000-14.22160723 on 25th Jan 2014 is stamped with RSPO Certified Segregation.

Mill (PLF) from January 2014 to S2 surveillance (Feb 2014) accepting fruit from plasma plantation, which is a non-certifies fruit for amount 89 Tones, further processed into CPO for amount 20 Tones.

The certified and non-certified FFB was accepted and processed together and no separation on its production process (loading ramp to CPO).

This condition shows that there is no segregation on the process. This condition influences the segregation claim that set in the SCCS procedure, where the CPO was claimed as Mass Balance product (not SG) and sales document or contract still indicates the SG supply chain model.

Status: Not complience CAR 2014.12

Verification on 31st March 2014

Root of Problem:

Pondok Labu mill is using the mass balance method on processing the FFB, but the sales contract shows a segregation supply chai model due to limited understanding and knowledge on mass balance supply chain model.

Curative Actions:

Organization has conducting training on 12nd March 2014, which attended by key personnel from estate and mill (attendance sheet is available). The memorandum from Head of PSQM on 17th March 2014 states that the used supply chain model is the mass balance (copy of memorandum is available). There is a revision on sales contract document, which states the supply chain model is mass balance, for instance, sales contract number: 00320/PSA/KTR-MKS/LOK/III/2014 on 20th March 2014.

Preventive Actions:

Periodic review on MB supply chain model and coordination with the entire stakeholders including the marketing unit.

Status: Closed Out

Status: Comply

4 Sales and goods out

4.1

The facility shall ensure that all sales invoices issued for RSPO palm oil delivered include the following information:

(a) The name and address of the buyer

(b) The date on which the invoice was issued

(c) A description of the product, including the applicable supply chain model (Segregated)

(d) The quantity of the product delivered

(e) Reference to related transport documentation

PSA since January until the S2 surveillance (Feb 2014) accepting non-certified fruit from plasma for amount 89 Tones and process it into CPO for about 20 Tones. The certified and non-certified FFB was accepted and processed together and no separation on its production process (loading ramp to CPO). This condition shows that there is no segregation on the process. This condition influences the segregation claim that set in the SCCS procedure, where the CPO was claimed as Mass Balance product (not SG) and sales document or contract still indicates the SG supply chain model.

For instance:

Invoices on 8th Jan 2014 No. 0539/PSA/I/2014 states:

- PT Sinarmas Agri resources and Technology TBK

- Invoicewas issued on 8th Jan 2014


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


- Product name is MKS with segregation supply chain model (stamped) RSPO Certified Segregation.

- Quantity or delivery volume

- D/O

Status: Comply

5 Processing

5.1

The facility shall assure and verify through clear procedures and record keeping that the RSPO certified palm oil is kept segregated from non certified material including during transport and storage and be able to demonstrate that is has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that contamination is avoided. The objective is for 100 % segregated material to be reached. The systems should guarantee the minimum standard of 95 % segregated physical material9; up to 5 % contamination is allowed.

There is no segregation on processing certified and non-certified FFB from Jan to Feb 2014, where the non-certified FFB from KKPA Cengal river and certified FFB from nucleus plantation (4 estates). Company able to present the record and procedure for certified and non-certified FFB as well as its transportation but not for the storage as the company can’t ensure no contamination. Furthermore, mill not able to present the 100% material segregation even though the 5% contamination is still allowed. NCR 2014.13


Root of problem:

Pondok Labu mill is using the segregation method during the audit due to limited understanding on mass balance supply chain model.

Corractive Actions:

Since 17th March 2014, Pondok Labu mill applied the mass balance supply chain model, copy of memorandum from Head of PSQM on 17th March 2014 is available, which states the supply chain model is the mass balance.

Preventive Actions:


Status: Closed Out

Status: Comply

5.2

The facility shall provide documented proof that the RSPO certified palm oil can be traced back to only certified segregated material.

Mill is using the Monthly Summary of Sustainable FFB, CPO and Kernel record (Jan 2013 – Feb 2014) and daily production record for its traceability. However, because the processing is mixed, mill is hardly to explain the traceability. Refers to con-compliance NCR2014.14


Root of problems:

Pondok Labu mill is using the segregation method during the audit due to limited understanding on mass balance supply chain model.

Curative Actions:

Since 17th March 2014, Pondok Labu mill applied the mass balance supply chain model, copy of memorandum from Head of


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


PSQM on 17th March 2014 is available, which states the supply chain model is the mass balance.

Preventive Actions:


Status: Closed Out

Status: Comply

5.3

In cases where a mill outsources activities to an independent palm kernel crush, the crush still falls under the responsibility of the mill and does not need to be separately certified. The mill has to ensure that:

The crush operator conforms to these requirements for segregation

The crush is covered through a signed and enforceable agreement

S2:

NA

Status: NA

6 Training

6.1

The facility shall provide the training for all staff as required to implement the requirements of the Supply Chain Certification Systems

SCCS training material from Mr. Untung M Shaleh (PSQM) on 12th June 2013. The SCCS training material that is used as a reference for RSPO Supply Chain Certification Standard, Final Document November 25th, 2011. There are 14 participants on this SCCS training (attendance sheet) for the entire key personnel in PLF and from estate.

But for PLF personnel, who start to participate on the training since last year (mentions below) are not able to present their evidence on participating the training activity:

1. Ahmad Subakir (PJS Factory Manager)

2. Suprapto (Ass PSQM)

3. Haryanto (head of administration division)

Non-compliance (NCR 2014.15)


Root of problems:

Pondok Labu mill has limited understanding on mass balance supply chain model.

Curative Actions:

Organization has conducted training on 28thMarch 2014, which attended bykey personnel from estate and mill (attendance sheet is available)

Preventive Actions:

It is recommended to conduct periodic socialization over supply chain model requirements for key personal

Status: Closed Out

Status: Comply

7 Claims

7.1 The facility shall only make claims regarding the use of or support of RSPO certified oil palm products that are in compliance with the RSPO Rules for Communications and Claims.


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


The RSPO guidelines for Communication and Claims related to certify products has been points out in SCCS procedure (declaration number 7), mill present this procedure. Until now, PSA isnot using the RSPO symbol for SG supply chain model.

PSA (PKS) is still using the adopted RSPO Executive Board on 28th Sept 2009 for reference the RSPO guidelines for Communication and Claims, instead of using the 31 March 2011 (the recommended one).

Status: Opportunities For Improvement


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


3.3. Conformity Checklist of Certificate and Logo Use (Only apply for Surveillance Assessment Report)

1. Evidence of permission or approval certificate and logo from Certification Body which submitted by Client

X or√

S2 The company does not use logo on its product. √

Status:

2. Implementation of certificate and logo used by Client comply with size and type (shape) against Guideline of Logo Use

X or√


Status: NA

3. Implementation of Certificate and Logo is not used on product

X or√


Status: NA

4. Controlling of Certificate and Logo, including withdrawing inappropriate logo.

X or√


Status: NA


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


3.4. Summary of RSPO Partial Certification.

Unit management of registered company in RSPO that has not been certified. PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera, KKPA Sungai Jernih, PT Guthrie Pecconina Indonesia

2.1

There is compliance with all applicable local, national and ratified international laws and regulations.

X or√

1. MAS POM, PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera. PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera is compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

2. KKPA Sungai Jernih, PT Guthrie Pecconina Indonesia There is evidence of law fulfillment include: a. Tenure of land compile with UU. 5 year 1960 on Agrarian Principles, namely HGU Certificate

No. 664/2003, 552/2003 for an area of 10139.91 ha. b. Providing social security such as labour social assurance (Jamsostek) compile with UU No. 3

year 1992. c. Providing equipment Occupational Safety and Health program for all employees compile with

UU No.. 1 year 1970. d. Environmental management document preparation progress (RKL / RPL) compile with UU

no. 23 year 1997. e. No land clearing by burning compile with UU No.. 18 year 2004. f. No discrimination against employees compile with UU No. 21 years 1999 - ratification of the

ILO's anti-discrimination stated in Collective Labor Agreement. g. Allocating some of the area as a protected area compile with Presidential Decree No.. 32

year 1990 and UU No. 41 year 1999 about Forestry. (Identification of HCV by Aksenta in July 2012).

h. Giving wages above the minimum wage. Corporate compliance to legality of land tenure, the implementation of environmental and social governance, labor protection, as well as the submission of the report to agencies (eg Environment Agency, Government, and the Department of Forestry and Plantations Musi Banyuasin) stated that the GPI is quite obedient and consistent with the rules.

√

2.2

The right to use the land can be demonstrated, and is not legitimately contested by local communities with demonstrable rights.

X or√

1. MAS POM, PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera. PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera has demonstrated land use and not legitimately contested by local communities. The company’s land acquisition process has been in accordance with the prevailing regulations

2. KKPA Sungai Jernih, PT Guthrie Pecconina Indonesia Company shown the documents of : a. location Permit compile with Regent of Musi Banyuasin decree No 262 year 2011 covering

area of 4,000 ha b. location Permit compile with Regent of Musi Banyuasin decree No 0217 year 2011 covering

area of 2,000 ha c. Determination of smallholder as 262 Candidates compile with Regent of Musi Banyuasin

decree No. 0258 year 2010. d. Cooperation Agreement with KUD Sinar delima No.001/Plasma/GPI-KUD/I/2012 about

development of Oil Palm Plantation with KKPA Partnership (Cooperative Credit Scheme) e. Plantation business permit (IUP) smallholder based on regent decree No. 0265 of 2010

(Core 800 ha and smallholder 1200 ha in Gajah Mati village, Sungai keruh subdistrict) and IUP based on regent decree No.. 282/KPTS/IUP/DISBUN/2011 (Core 1600 ha and smallholders 2400 ha).

f. Distribution plan had already plots, is waiting approval from village cooperative unit (KUD)

√


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


distribute to smallholders There is statement of the land handover from land owners such as pedestal Business Right and letter of recognition. For example, land handover statement on behalf of Aziz Ali with pedestal Business Rights and letter of recognition dated July 9, 2007 for an area of 2.8 ha approved by Head of Gajah mati Village and a letter of recognition on behalf of Aziz Ali for land area of 2.8 hectares in Gajah Mati Village on February 24, 2008 and registered in Subdistrict Office No.593/126/2009/XII/2008 dated December 3, 2008.

6.3

There is a mutually agreed and documented system for dealing with complaints and grievances, which is implemented and accepted by all parties.

X or√

1. MAS POM, PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera. PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera has documented system for dealing with complaints and grievances, which is implemented and accepted by all parties. There is a Communication Procedure No. Policy 501/MAS-KOM-03/11 dated 8 April 2011 implemented through the Mail Box, Email, Announcements, posters, brochures / pamphlets and meeting / briefing, etc. To resolve complaints / disputes associated with land, the company has prepared a Compensation Negotiation Process Mechanism No Policy 501/MAS-Doc 01/11 dated 8 April 2011, which contains a flowchart of (derasa) compensation payment process through a amicable discussion and meetings with Muspika (Task Force).

2. KKPA Sungai Jernih, PT Guthrie Pecconina Indonesia There is Consultation and Communication procedures to Community (RSPO/6.2/KKM), Society Complaint Handling (RSPO/6.3/PKM), Employee Complaints Handling (RSPO/6.5/PKK) and conflict resolution (RSPO/2.2/PK) . It had socialize to communities around the estate are (1) Talang Piase Village (May 14, 2011), (2) Talang Ilo III village (May 27, 2011), (3) NAPAL Village (May 29 20 110) and (4) Karang Ringin Village II (May 26, 2011), (5) Rantau Kasih Village (May 13, 2011). The socialization Record consist of time, place, material, photo and attendees list.

Technical of disputes solution as effective, timely and correct manner describe in mechanism (flow chart) the complaints handling as follow : Complaints from internal / external received by Kasie and note it, then delivered to the manager to make decision or if needed to consult with head department and last made decision. Complaints from workers can solve in two days (counting from the complaint entered into management until realization decision), while society complaints handling is depending on the type of complaints, if the complaint was mild and the facilities available, it can solve more or less three days, but if complaints is significant and need consultation with head office management, approximately one week.

√

6.4

Any negotiations concerning compensation for loss of legal or customary rights are dealt with through a documented system that enables indigenous peoples, local communities and other stakeholders to express their views through their own representative institutions.

X or√

1. MAS POM, PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera. PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera has a Compensation Negotiation Process Procedure No. Policy 501/MAS-Doc 01/11 dated 8 April 2011, which contains a flowchart of compensation payment process (Derasa) through amicable discussion and meeting with Muspika. The pricing of compensation is based on the Minutes of Agreement on Compensation (Derasa) Pricing dated December 8, 2005 as agreed by PT MAS, Community Leaders and KUD managers, acknowledged by Sub-District Chiefs (3 Sub-districts). Socialization was held on December 9, 2005 and attended by 35 representatives of related groups.

2. KKPA Sungai Jernih, PT Guthrie Pecconina Indonesia Procedures to identify and calculate the compensation for loss of legal or customary rights over the land covered by procedure (SOP) Conflict Resolution (RSPO/2.2/PK) and have been socialized

All proof related with conflict resolution is available in form of statement of the land handover from land owners such as pedestal Business Right and letter of recognition.For example land handover

√


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


statement on behalf of Aziz Ali with pedestal Business Rights and letter of recognition dated July 9, 2007 for an area of 2.8 ha approved by Head of Gajah mati Village and a letter of recognition on behalf of Aziz Alifor land area of 2.8 hectares in Gajah Mati Village on February 24, 2008 and registered in Subdistrict Office No.593/126/2009/XII/2008 dated December 3, 2008.

7.3

New plantings since November 2005, have not replaced primary forest or any area required to maintain or enhance one or more High Conservation Values.

X or√

1. MAS POM, PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera. PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera has not replaced primary forest or any area required to maintain or enhance one or more High Conservation Values. Based on the company’s Plantation Concession issued through Decision of Land Agency Head of Sanggau District No. 400-56/IL-1999 dated January 8, 1999 on the Granting of Extension Concession the Purposes of Palm Oil Plantation located at Parindu, Bonti, Hulu and Kembayan Tayan sub-districts in the name of PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera with a total area of 20,000 hectares of 30,000 hectares reserved area, the concession of PT MAS is located within Other Use Area (APL) in accordance with the Spatial Plan of West Kalimantan Province The company management has declared to the community that the company will preserve and will not cultivate palm oil crops in areas that have been identified as HCV (MAS-3 Estate’s Statement Letter dated May 1, 2011). Local people / Indigenous Figures joined in Satlak were directly involved in the identification process of areas where palm oil planting is not allowed in accordance with the agreement.

2. KKPA Sungai Jernih, PT Guthrie Pecconina Indonesia There is identification of HCV conducted in July 2011 by RSPO approved assessor. These documents ensure that no area of HCV is used for development of new KKPA plantations.

√

7.5

No new plantings are established on local peoples’ land without their free, prior and informed consent, dealt with through a documented system that enables indigenous peoples, local communities and other stakeholders to express their views through their own representative institutions.

X or√

1. MAS POM, PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera. Available EIA documents as approved by the Central EIA Committee letter the Department of Forestry and Plantations, No: 242/Menhutbun-II/2000, on March 23, 2000. The company has conducted studies of social impact, but until the implementation of Stage-1 is still in draft form. SIA mentioned in the draft document; a. Positive Impacts

1. Direct Impacts - Significant local people are employed by the company. - Emergence of livelihood sources. - Increased revenue sources and incomes of the villagers. - Increased productivity, value and status of land (impact of KKPA plasma

development). - Increased accessibility and mobility of people, goods and services. - Public’s positive perception to the company.

2. Indirect - The increasingly growth of local businesses - Increased cash flow and fund circulation in the surrounding villages. - Increased purchasing power of the local people.

b. Negative Impacts; 1. Direct impacts;

- Reduced size of public lands, - Public’s negative perception to the company, - Dispute/conflict

2. Indirect impacts and Accumulation

√


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5


- Clean water problem, - Impaired traditional value system of mutual cooperation,

- Change in lifestyles of rural people. Based on the Plantation Development Realization Report of the socialization of new land opening has been conducted in July to September 2010 for Bonti and Kembayan Sub-districts, and unit has done socialization of new land opening in March 2011 (Sedae, Canal, Mua, Kampuh, and Tapa sub-villages). Based on interviews with residents of RT Pinsam the company’s new plantation opening process also involved te Satlak Team consisting of Sub-village Chiefs, Indigenous leaders, KUD Sekayam Jaya Manager and Village officials as officers who perform verification of the land to be opened.

2. KKPA Sungai Jernih, PT Guthrie Pecconina Indonesia

Procedures to identify and calculate the compensation for loss of legal or customary rights over the land covered by procedure (SOP) Conflict Resolution (RSPO/2.2/PK).There is no contents revisions or mechanisms of compensation calculation. It is similar to previous audits. There is statement of the land handover from land owners such as pedestal Business Right and letter of recognition. For example, land handover statement on behalf of Aziz Ali with pedestal Business Rights and letter of recognition dated July 9, 2007 for an area of 2.8 ha approved by Head of Gajah mati Village and a letter of recognition on behalf of Aziz Alifor land area of 2.8 hectares in Gajah Mati Village on February 24, 2008 and registered in Subdistrict Office No.593/126/2009/XII/2008 dated December 3, 2008.

Development of smallholder based on agreement between KUD Sinar delima with PT GPI in accordance of Cooperation Agreement No.001/Plasma/GPI-KUD/I/2012 about development of Oil Palm Plantation with KKPA Partnership (Cooperative Credit Scheme). Determination of smallholder as 262 Candidates compile with Regent of Musi Banyuasin decree No. 0258 year 2010.

7.6

Local people are compensated for any agreed land acquisitions and relinquishment of rights, subject to their free, prior and informed consent and negotiated agreements.

X or√

1. MAS POM, PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera. There is a Land Compensation Negotiation Process procedure No. 501/MAS-Doc 01/11 dated 8 April 2011 in which contains a flow chart of compensation process involving amicable deliberation and meetings with Muspika (Task Force). Documented process and agreement of land acquisition for new plantation area are maintained in MAS 3 Estate’s office and RSPO secretariat office in MAS 1 Estate.

2. KKPA Sungai Jernih, PT Guthrie Pecconina Indonesia

There is statement of the land handover from land owners (pedestal Business Right and letter of recognition) that voluntarily agreed. For example, land handover statement on behalf of Aziz Ali with pedestal Business Rights and letter of recognition dated July 9, 2007 for an area of 2.8 ha approved by Head of Gajah mati Village and a letter of recognition on behalf of Aziz Alifor land area of 2.8 hectares in Gajah Mati Village on February 24, 2008 and registered in Subdistrict Office No.593/126/2009/XII/2008 dated December 3, 2008.

√


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5 Prepared by Mutuagung Lestari for Pondok Labu POM - PT Paripurna Swakarsa-Sime Darby Plantation Sdn Bhd.

3.5 Identification of Findings, Corrective Action, Observations, Opportunity for Improvement and Noteworthy Positive Components.

3.5.1 Identification of Findings, Corrective Actions and Observations at Surveillance 1 Assessment

CAR No

Ref Std Finding Area Grade Time

Limits Corrective Action Observation Status

Closing Date

1 2013. 01 Minor 4.4.1

Records of water management programs implementation The Company has not conducted evaluation related to the results of rivers and dam water quality testing

Estate Minor S2 Company conducted evaluation related to the results of rivers and dam water quality testing.

January 20, 2013 PSA has conducted an evaluation of the results of water quality testing by comparing the appropriate quality standard PP. 82 Year 2001 and the company has taken action against the parameters that do not meet quality standards.

Closed 20 January 2013

2 2013. 02 Major 4.6.4

Waste Management of agrochemical There are still used pesticide packaging stored in a place that is not permitted

Estate Major March 16, 2013

Companies must keep used pesticide packaging in a place that has a permit.

January 16, 2013 Certificate from Environment Agency of Kota Baru District is now available No. 660/415/BLHD, dated on November 19, 2012 related to the hazardous waste temporary storage in Pondok Labu Estate, Sesulung Estate, Rampa Estate &Binturung Estate (temporary storage place for 15 days).


3 2013. 03 Major 4.8.3

Evidence of the use of trained contractors Evidence stated that the company had used a trained contractor not yet available enough

Estate & Mill

Major March 16, 2013

The company provides the evidence stated that the company has used trained contractors.

20 January 2013 Activity evaluation prior to payment is now available, in the form of minutes of the examination work if it is worth or not to be paid that contains the results of the evaluation of the implementation work result. Certificate of construction enterprise services with no 0300/Gapensi/16/3/08 from national construction service development agency of to CV Gunung

Closed

20 January 2013


ASSESSMENT REPORT


Selamat where the concerned company has the competence and capability and can carry out construction activities throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia

4 2013. 05 Major 5.3.2 Minor 5.3.1

Waste management plan There is Hazardous Waste (used pesticides packaging, used filter and used oil) are stored in a place that is not permitted.

Estate Major March 16, 2013

Companies must store the hazardous waste in a licensed storage.

January 16, 2013 Now available Certificate from Environment Agency of Kota Baru District No. 660/415/BLHD, dated on November19, 2012 related to the Hazardous waste temporary storage in Pondok Labu Estate, Sesulung Estate, Rampa Estate & Binturung Estate (temporary storage place for 15 days)


5 SCCS 1.1.a

Documentation Procedures In the procedure of product identification and product search capabilities in POM of Minamas Plantation does not explain specifically the scope of application of all SCCS element with mass balance supply chain model.

Mill NC February 16 2013

Companies need to make sure that all the elements in the product identification procedures and the ability of search products at POM of Minamas Plantation include requirements of RSPO SCCS November 2011.

February 13th, 2013 PT Paripurna Swakarsa has the procedure for Identification and Traceability of Product at Minamas Plantation Palm Oil Mill (No. Policy: RSPO/65/SCPP/PSA, Rev. 01, dated 14th January 2013. Reference of this procedure:

- Technical Guidelines for Palm Oil Mills – I Minamas Plantation

- Procedure of Records Handling - Working Guidelines for Field

Assistant TQEM - Supply Chain Certification

Requirements - RSPO Supply Chain Certification

Standard, Final Document November 25th, 2011

Closed 13 February , 2013

6 SCCS 3.4

Record storage The company can not show enough

Mill NC February 16 2013

Companies should include mass balance supply

February 14th, 2013

Since PT Paripurna Swakarsa has

Closed 14 February


ASSESSMENT REPORT


evidence that the mass balance supply chain model shown, used and included in each purchase and sale of products document contract.

chain model in each purchase and product sales contract document.

certified on March 16th, 2012, there is no request/selling of product with RSPO certified claimed. Nonetheless the company has a relevant document for demonstrable, if in the case of later on they have request for claim certified product. i.e.: Sales Contract No. 00238/PSA/KTR-MKS/LOK/X/2012, was specified the code of RSPO Certified Segregation.

2013

3.5.2 Identification of Findings, Corrective Actions and Observations at Surveillance 2 Assessment

CAR No

Ref Std

Finding Area Grade Time


Closing Date

2014.1 Major 4.4.1

Protection over surface water quality and quantity Monitoring and measurement over water quality in reservoir, inlet river in Division I Sesulung,and Outlet river Separe, which is passing by the mill. However, based on interview with head of pondok labu village, community using the water from river Biuku, which its has not been assessed and evaluated. Moreover, the measurement result over reservoir’s water quality in Div. I, Div. II, andDiv. III (on 16th Jan 2014) shows that one of its parameter exceeded the standard threshold base on Permenkes 416/1990 (annex.2)and there is nether neither currative

Estate Major April 30 ,

2014

Company should take some protetion actions to protect surface water quality and quantity especially for water’s quality in order to maintain the quality of reservoir’s water.

Root cause: RKL and RPL recommendation matrix as well as AMDAL document not regulate the monitoring and measurement over biuku water’s quality Corrective Actions: Company sent the water sample from biuku river to examination laboratory in Banjarbaru. Examination laboratory in research center and industrial standardization and trade has accepted the sample on 14 March 2014. STB/hand over note for sample is available.Company has evaluated the examination result From reservoir in RPE Div.I, Div. II, and Div.

Closed, 28 April 2014


ASSESSMENT REPORT


CAR No

Ref Std



Closing Date

nor preventive actions.

III. Company sent the improvement evidence such asevaluation report on 15 April 2014 Preventive Actions: Make a schedule for water quality examination including examination for biuku river’s water. Pointed Mr. Suprapto Isup as person in charge to conduct the evaluation over the examination report (LHU) and monitoring result. Maintain water quality in order to be inline with its natural condition and avoid pollution. Conducting socialization for personnel in order to build awareness in community to process the water properly before consumed.

2014.02

Minor 4.6.2 Minor 4.7.2

Medical examination for spraying officer Based on medical examination, there are 7 personnel with CHE (chemical) examination result above the normal threshold (4,260-11,250 U/L), for instance Ms. Sumiyati D (14,229 U/L) and Sumiati C (15,479 U/L). But until the surveillance, company not conducting evaluation or follow-up actions toward these personnel

Estate Major April 30, 2014

Company should present its consistency on managing the used persticide package that inline with reccomendation from environment agency and SOP for hazardouse waste management.

Root cause: Limited monitoring on hazardous waste especially, which comes from used agrochemical packages. Corrective Actions : Waste from used pesticide package has been managed in line with recommendation from BLH and SOP for hazardous waste management, for instance the agrochemical packages in sesulung estate have been washed and damaged in bottom area before transported to licensed landfill (the evidence is documented on 1st April 2014, minutes of LB3 withdrawal and photos area available)

Closed 15 April 2014


ASSESSMENT REPORT


CAR No

Ref Std



Closing Date

Preventive Actions: Conducting socialization on hazardous waste management Delivering the hazardous waste based on SOP and applicable permits. Periodic transportation for hazardous waste from estate every 2 weeks.

2014.3 Major 4.6.4

Waste from used pesticide packages The management for agrochemical waste is not inline with the reccomendation from environment agency and SOP for hazardouse waste mangement, such as: c. Waste from used pesticide packages in

sesulung estate not using 3 times washing approach and not damaged in its bottom area.

d. Utilization over used pesticide package has no permit from related agency.


Company should present its consistency on managing the used persticide package that inline with reccomendation from environment agency and SOP for hazardouse waste management.

Root cause: Limited monitoring on hazardous waste especially, which comes from used agrochemical packages. Corrective Actions : Waste from used pesticide package has been managed inline with recommendation from BLH and SOP for hazardous waste management, for instance the agrochemical packages in sesulung estate have been washed and damaged in bottom area before transported to licensed landfill (the evidence is documented on 1st April 2014, minutes of LB3 withdrawal and photos area available) Preventive Actions: Conducting socialization on hazardous waste management Delivering the hazardous waste based on SOP and applicable permits. Periodic transportation for hazardous waste from estate every 2 weeks.



ASSESSMENT REPORT


CAR No

Ref Std



Closing Date

2014.4 Major 4.7.2

SMK3 organization SSE P2K3 secretary (Mr.Suwarto)doesn’t have K3 expert certificate.


Company should be able to present the evidence that the SSE P2K3 has had the K3 expert certificate.

Root cause: P2K3 secretary tat has K3 expert certificate had been moved to another unit. Corrective Actions: There is a mutation in P2K3 SSE, where former secretary, Mr. I Made Admika (who has the K3 expert certificate) had been replaced by Mr. Suwarto, (13.2284/AK3/U/VII/2013). The DISOSNAKER Kotabaru has known the change in P2K3 structure (inline with SK no: 182/SSE-disosnakertrans/III/2014/s on 27thMarch 2014. This change has been reported and stated on latest P2K3 report. Preventive Actions: Conducting monitoring over establishment of P2K3 structure which inline with regulation.


2014.5 Minor 4.7.4

Record over training and K3 program’s training. Based on observation and interview with community in RPE, it’s known that at present, the welders have not received training to earn welder’s certificate.

Estate Minor Surveillance 3

Company must be able to present the evidence over medical examination for welders.

Root cause: Corrective Actions: Preventive Actions:

2014.6 Minor 4.7.6

Compliance toward P3K tools. Field verification shows the P3K tolls are not provided/ sufficient in some working area, such as in fertilization and harvesting area (SSE and RPE), WTPwarehouse and LB3 landfill (mill).

Estate and Mill

Minor Surveillance 3

Company must conducting socialization over HCV existance and its mangement to personnel and community.



ASSESSMENT REPORT


CAR No

Ref Std



Closing Date

2014.8 Minor 5.2.2

Special/ trained officer to monitor and manage the HCV Not enough evidance on the presence of special/trained officer in company’s organogram to monitor and manage the HCV in SSE, RPE, dan PLE.


Compnay must present the evidence of special/ trained officer to monitor and manage the HCV area in SSE, RPE, dan PLE


2014.9 Major 5.3.2

Minor 5.6.2

Waste Management

Field verification in waste water installation (IPAL) in Pondok Labu mill shows a waste leakage, which comes from mill’s activity, such as: c) Liquid waste leakage from land

application pump toward trench and water’s conduit.

Liquid waste leakage from domestic waste reservoir to trench and estate as well as wate’s conduit. Visit to personnel housing shows the organic and un-organic domestic waste have not been maanged inline woth sop for non-hazardous waste management (burned and not sent to landfill)

Company not able to present the evidance of hazardous waste disposal that inline with the applicable regulation especially PP 18 in 1999.

Estate and Mill

Major April 30 , 2014

Company should present the evidance of waste disposal which is socially and environmentally accepted.

Root cause:



Currative action: There is an improvement over pump and establishing trap for reservoir. There is an improvement in reservoir pond to store domestic, Conducting the socialization for waste disposal and ban waste burn in housing location. Make a schedule for waste disposal to landfill (photos are available) Preventive Actions: Maximize the monitoring activity over waste ponds Consistently manage the domestic waste disposal.

Closed 4 April 2014

2014.10

Minor 6.1.1

RKL-RPL implementation with community’s participations. Company has a record for peridic environment management and monitoring.

Estate and mill

Minor Surveillance 3

Company should present the evidance over participatory environment management and

Root cause: Corractive Actions: Preventive Actions:


ASSESSMENT REPORT


CAR No

Ref Std



Closing Date

However, the participatory environment management and monitrong as well as social impact monitoring implementation can’t reduce community’s restlessness, for instance: community’s restlessness due to abcency of plasma plantation scheme in Rampa village, issue of land ownership after the replanting activity in Pondok Labu village and restlessness on pollution due to plantation activity in Rampa village.

monitoring

2014.11

Minor 6.2.2

Aspiration’s response record. There are some aspirations from community that have not been properly (not inline with communication and consultation sop) responded by company, for instance:

1. letter No. 094/394/RC-SR/XII/2013 regarding the allowance request for honorarium teacher (letter on 28 December 2013).

2. letter No. 094/392/RC-Bant/XII/2013 regarding the clarity over soccer field construction (letter on 28 December 2013).

3. letter No. 094/393/RC-Bant/XII/2013 reagrding the clarity fo rice support for poor people in Rampa village (letter on 28 December 2013).


Compnay must present the response record over community’s aspiration that inline with communication and consultation SOP.



ASSESSMENT REPORT


3.5.3 Opportunity for Improvement

No Ref Std Descriptions

1 Minor

4.3.1

Map of sandy area

It needs to consider or make a map for sandy soil and mineral soil area, which have been identified in estate location, for instance in SSE near Division IV SSE (heading to south) to distinguish the minimum treatment and control erosion and land degradation by applied empty fruit bunch in these area.

2 Major 6.9.1 Socialization record over sexual harrasment policy.

Company is encouraged to conduct the effective socialization on sexual harrasment policy and reproductive right for its personnel.

3 Point 6.1. SCCS Ver Nov 2011

PSA (MILL) using the adopted RSPO Executive Board on Sept 28, 2009 as a reference for RSPO guidelines for Communication and Claims despite the latest version on March 31, 2011. Company should present the evidence that they use the latest version.

3.5.4

Noteworthy Positive Components

No Ref Std Descriptions

1 Company’s commitment to implement the principle for sustainable palm oil management and shows its commitment to sustain the RSPO certificate, which earned by curative actions over the entire non-compliance from previous surveillance.

2 earn “blue” level in PROPER assessment by environment agency in 2013.


ASSESSMENT REPORT


3.6 Summary of Arising Issues from Public, Management and Auditor Response Public consultation on: 24 -25th February 2014

Issue from public (institution/ NGO / Community)

Management Responses Auditor Responses

Kotabaru Environment agency office - Kalimantan Selatan

(pollution and hazardous waste sub division)

Company has submitting periodic environment management report like RKL andRPL 6 months report and waste management 3 months report to environment agency.

Company has the environment permit for ladn application and hazardous waste landfill permit.

Neither report nor complaint from community related to environment pollution.

Blh conducting periodic monitoring on company’s activity and so far company has no violance record.

Inline with periodic report Inline with document and field verification.

Manpower agency,Kotabaru district – Kalimantan Selatan

Henry (K3 supervisor)

No issue related to K3

Inline with periodic report Inline with document and field verification

National land agency, Kotawaringin Timur district

No issue related to land status

Inline with periodic report Inline with document and field verification

Sesulung Village

M. Ibrahim (head of village)

The environment management and monitoring not fully contain the evidence of participatory social impact management and monitoring implementation that inline with AMDAL document

RefersCAR 2014.10 (Minor 6.1.1)


ASSESSMENT REPORT




a. Possitive Aspects

Positive aspect from company’s presence:

Controbution toward village’s infrastructure construction and lending heavy equipment and establishing office village. Company also involves in Musrenbang Discussion together with local community.

CSR and grants activity for community, such as: rice allowance for elderly people, budget assistance for village operation

Increasing community’s income generating by hiring local community (lot of fisherman now change their profession to estate’s personnel) or from plasma plantation scheme. Community hope that partnership with company will sustain for a long period.

Education facility especially the junior high school in estate and transportation facility

Vacant position always transparantly announced in village

No significant complain over pollution, which comes from company’s activity.

No under-age personnel

Socialization for complain mechanism has been conducted

Company provides medical facility that can be used freely by local community. Company’s clinin also provide reccomendation to hospital if needed

Socialization for wildlife and vegetation protection has been conducted, but community not fully know the location and the management.


ASSESSMENT REPORT




b. Negative Aspects

CSR assistance still limited especially grant for village operation

Negative aspect usually can be discussed together with company.

Rampa villahe

Hasanudin (Kaur government), Mubarak (community leader)

a. possitive Aspects

CSR activity such as meat grants, road construction work, assistance on establishing mosque

Recruitment for local community, even at present there are only 50 local community who work for company. Most of local community still work as fisherman or enterpreneur for fish product or work in domestic industry.

c. Negative Aspect

Company’s response is quite slow, for instance delay on responding incoming letters, like letter No. 094/394/RC-SR/XII/2013 regaridng the allowance request for honorarium teacher (letter on 28th December 2013); letter No. 094/392/RC-Bant/XII/2013 regardingthe clarity of soccer field construction (letter on 28th December 2013); letterNo. 094/393/RC-Bant/XII/2013 regarding rice allowance for widows in Rampa village (on 28th December 2013).

Company not participating in Musrenbang, because company was not invited

No realization over junior high school construction as promised by the company. The reason for this is that the reslization still under process in jakarta office or still under bidding process. Community has provided the

The environment management and monitoring not fully contain the evidence of participatory social impact management and monitoring implementation that in line with AMDAL document

Refers to CAR 2014.10 (Minor 6.1.1)


ASSESSMENT REPORT




land and there is an approval from local government.

Allowance for elderly people ever exist, but now has been stopped by company

No significant complain over environment pollution, which comes from estate and mill activity – like the usage of chemical material from trench or river’s water in estate area.

No KKPA for Rampa’s community because community cannot provide the land. There should be any economic empowerment in another form like fish pond for community in Rampa vilage.

neither socialization over wildlife and vegetation protection nor communication mechanism socialization ever done by company.

Pondok Labu village

Head of Pondok Labu village in Biyuku sub village. (Mr. Radiman) interview regarding the positive and negative impact over estate and mill’s operation for local community in Pondok Labu village; togain information on social and land issue.

Positive Issues:

- Access to village

- Road construction by company

- Employment

- No land conflict

- KKPA (plasma plantation scheme) for some community in Pondok Labu

The environment management and monitoring not fully contain the evidence of participatory social impact management and monitoring implementation that in line with AMDAL document

Company has had periodic implementation over environment management and monitoring, however, the implementation record over environment management and monitoring not fully contain the evidence of participatory social impact management and monitoring implementation in order to anticipate community’s restlessness, like land ownership issue after replanting activity in Pondok Labu village, etc. Refers to CAR 2014.10 (Minor 6.1.1)


ASSESSMENT REPORT




village

- Neither disruption not environment impact.

Negative Issues:

- Bureaucracy process to disburse company’s grants

- No socialization on HGU related to replanting plan

- The unclear status over HCV socialization

Community leader, Biyuku sub village (Mr. Jaim).

Interview regarding the positive and negative impact over estate and mill’s operation for local community in Pondok Labu village; to gain information on social and land issue.

Positive Issues:

Similar to head of Pondok Labu village description, that there is no disruption toward environment.

Negative Issues:

Response over road construction assistance request is really hard to be processed.

The environment management and monitoring not fully contain the evidence of participatory social impact management and monitoring implementation that inline with AMDAL document

Refers to CAR 2014.10 (Minor 6.1.1)


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5 Prepared by Mutuagung Lestari for Pondok Labu POM – PT Paripurna Swakarsa-Sime Darby Plantation Sdn Bhd.

4.0 CERTIFIED ORGANISATION'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INTERNAL RESPONSIBILITY

4.1 Formal Sign-off of Assessment Findings

Hereunder sign by management representative from inspected company to acknowledge a field assessment and agree for all content explained in this assessment report, included of non-compliance findings.

Signed on behalf of:

PT Paripurna Swakarsa

PT Mutuagung Lestari

Head of PSQM Minamas Plantation SIME DARBY Plantation Sdn. Bhd

Lead Auditor

Mohamad Pirabaharan

Bukti Bagja

Wednesday, 7 May 2014

Wednesday, 7 May 2014


ASSESSMENT REPORT


Appendix 1. List of Stakeholder Contacted in the RSPO Certification Process

No Institution/NGO/Community Address Phone/Email Form of Contact

Date of Contact

1 Head of Sesulung Village Viillage of Sesulung - Meeting

February

27th 2014

2 Village Staff and Community Leader of Rampa Sub Village

Village of Rampa - FGD

February

28th 2014

3 Kepala Desa Pondok Labu Village Pondok Labu - Meeting

February

27th 2014

4 Tokoh Masyarakat Dsn Biyuku Sub District Biyuku -

FGD February

28th 2014

5 Dinas Perkebunan Kotabaru District of Kotabaru 0518- 21227

By phone February

28th 2014

6 Badan Lingkungan Hidup Daerah (BPLHD)

District of Kotabaru [email protected]

By phone

and email

February

18th 2014

7 Dinas Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi

District of Kotabaru 0518-21259

By phone February

28th 2014

8 Forum Komunitas Hijau

Banjarmasin, Kalimantan Selatan

[email protected] Via email February 18th 2014

9 Yayasan Alam Hijau Lestari



10 Lembaga Pemberdayaan

Masyarakat Adat



11 Yayasan Bakti Alam Lestari



12 Wahana Lingkungan Hidup










ASSESSMENT REPORT


DATE February 25th – 28th 2014

PROGRAM ACTUAL

PROGRAM PROCESSES / CLAUSES TO BE AUDITED AUDITOR

February 25th 2014

08.00-12.00 14.00-17.00

February 25th 2014

08.00-12.00 14.00-17.00

Opening Meeting Document Review and Review of Previous Visit Non-conformance (surveillance-1 and Stage-2)

Stakeholders consultation to Nearest village andd community leader

All Auditor

February 26th 2014

08.00 – 12.00

14.00 – 16.30

February 26th 2014

08.00 – 12.00

14.00 – 16.30

Field Observation:

a. Sesulung Estate

Legal operational and Conservation Area

Worker facilities (housing, health clinic, clean water, etc)

Manuring, Spraying, Harvesting, best agricultural practices

Land Fire facilities, Storage, ect..

Pondok Labu POM : WWTP (IPAL), Operational, K3 (OHS), Supply Chain

All Auditor

February 27th 2014

08.00 – 12.00 14.00 – 16.30

February 27th 2014

08.00 – 12.00

14.00 – 16.30

Pondok Labu Estate

Legal operational and Conservation Area

Worker facilities (housing, health clinic, clean water, etc)

Manuring, Spraying, Harvesting, best agricultural practices

Land Fire facilities, Storage, ect..

Continue checklist and audit finding preparation

All Auditor

February 28th 2014

08.00 – 12.00

February 28th 2014

08.00 – 12.00

closing meeting

All Auditor

Appendix 2. Assessment Program


ASSESSMENT REPORT


Appendix 3. Glossary

ANDAL : Analisis mengenai dampak lingkungan

B3 : Bahan berbahaya dan beracun

BOD : Biological oxygen demand

CD : Community development

CPO : Crude palm oil

CFA : Comment for action

HCV : High conservation value

HGU : Hak Guna Usaha

HPO : Head Plantation Operation

IUP : Izin usaha perkebunan

LNI : Lanting estate

K3 : Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja

RDE : Randi Estate

RKL : Rencana kelola lingkungan

RPL : Rencana pemantauan lingkungan

SLE : Selabak Estate

SLF : Selabak Factory

SNE : Sangkoh Estate

SPK : Surat perjanjian kerjasama

S2 : Surveillance 2

PSD : Plantation Service departement

PKB : Perjanjian kerja bersama

PKS : Pabrik kelapa sawit

POME : Palm oil mill effluent

PSQM : Plantation Sustainable Quality Management

P3K : Pertolongan pertama pada kecelakaan

TBS Tandan buah sawit

stage-1 [ ] stage-2 [ ] pt paripurna swakarsa mutu … · 2014-11-02 · prepared by mutuagung...

Documents