HN F-EP-08 57-2

Statement of Work for Analytical Services Provided By Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Analytical Chemistry Laboratory

Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy

Project Hanford Management Contractor for the US. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-96RL13200

Approved for Public Release

LE= DISWMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied. or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy. completeness, or any third party's use or the results of such use of any information. apparatus. product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned n'ghts. Reference herein to any specific commercial prcduct, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply ib endorsement. recommendation, or favon'ng by the United States Government or any egency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily Rate or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

This repor7 has been reproduced from the best available copy. Available in paper copy and microfiche.

Available to the US. Depement of Energy a@ it5 contractors from Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 ' Oak Ridge. TN 37831 (615) 5768401

Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Pon Royal Road Springfield. VA 22161 (703) 487-4650

Plinlcd m Ur United Steteo of A m e k a

DISCLM1.CHP (1-91,)

HNF-EP-0857-2 UC-2070

Statement of Work for Analytical Services Provided By Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Analytical Chemistry Laboratory

Date Published

June 1997

Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy

Project Hanford Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-96RL13200

Approved for Public Release

RELEASE AUTHORIZATION

~~ ~

Document Number: HNF-EP-0857-2

Statement of Work for Analytical Services Provided by PNNL's Analytical Chemistry Laboratory Document Title:

This document, reviewed in accordance with DOE Order 1430.1 D, "Scientific and Technical Information Management,"

and DOE G 1430.1D-1, "Guide to the Management of Scientific and Technical Information," does not contain classified or

sensitive unclassified information and is:

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE

Lockheed Martin Services, Inc. - Document Control/Information Clearance

viewed for Applied Technology, Business Ssnsitiw, Classified, Copyrighted, Export Controlled. Potent, Psrsonallfdvats, Ropdotary, )tected CRADA, Tmdemak Unclaaalfisd Controlled Nuclear Information.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER. This report was prepared as an =count of work sponaorod by an agomy of the United States Govornmsm. Neither the United States Gowmmsm nor m y agency thereof, not any of their omployass, nor any of their Oontractors, subcontractors or their smployoor, msksa any wsnonty, sxprosa or Implied, or ali iums any legal l iabiiii or rssponsibilii for the scsuracy. completenoso, & any third party's use or the reauks of such use of any information, apparatus, prodwt, or process disdossd, or repreemts that its use would not infdngs privately owwd rights. Reference herein to any specific commercld pmdwt, proosss. or Service by trade name, tradema*, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not wcsssarily constitute or Imply its sndorasmsnt, recommsndatbn, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its Contractom or subcontractors. The views and opinions of author* expressed herein do not nsceasarily state or reflect those of the United Stater Government or any agency thereof. This report has been reproduced from the best rvailabia copy. fdnted In the United States of America. Availabls to the US. Department of Energy and its omtractom fmm the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; TsIephono:423/5758401.

Available to the public from the US. Departmentof Commerce Nstiinal Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield. VA 22161: Telephons: 703/4874650.

A-6001-400.2 (09/94)

HNF-EP-0857-2

Approved by: K . J . Kuhl-Klinger, W t i n g Manager P a c i f i c Northwest National Laboratory Analyt ical Chemistry Laboratory

Approved by:

e r l g u a l i t y Operations P a c i f i c Northwest National Laboratory Analyt ical Chemistry Laboratory

Approved by: R. B. Barmettlor, ManZgb Rust Federal Services of Hanford Inc. 300 Area LEF

Approved by: 5. A. D i l l h o f c T e a m Leader B&W Hanford Company FFTF Regulatory Compl i ance and ECO, FFTF/MASF

Approved by: kZ2dFX-a- D. E. Rasmussen, Manager B&W Hanford Company 327 F a c i l i t y

Approved by:

Approved by: E. J . Bi f ten , Manager B&W Hanford Company Advanced Fuel F a c i l i t i e s Trans i t ion

Waste Operations Q u a l i t y Assurance

b/z&/Q 7 Date

6/27/97 Date

6 -26-97 Date

HNF-EP-0857-2

Document Title: STATEMENT OF WORK FOR ANALYTICAL SERVICES PROVIDED BY PNNL's ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY

6 - 3 0 - 4 ' 5

Date Prepared by: J. k- 2-

Perry, S c i e n t i s t Rust Federal Services of Hanford Inc. Air and Water Services

Approved by: E . M. Greaaer. Manager Rust Federal Services of Hanford Inc. Air and Water Services

C - S - 97 Date

d-zr- 97 Date

Approved by: L . P. Diediker, Team Leader Rust Federal Services of Hanford Inc. Air and.Water Services

Approved by: \j- L .& b - a b -47 b. u. Luke, Team Leader Rust Federal Services of Hanford Inc. Air and Water Services

Date

Approved by: B. P. Gleckler, Advanced Engineer Rust Federal Services of Hanford Inc. Air and Water Services

Approved by:

Analytical Chemistry Laboratory

Approved by: $6 4 L . R. Greenwood, Lead S c i e n t i s t Pac i f i c Northwest National Laboratory

Approved by: $6 4 L . R. Greenwood, Lead S c i e n t i s t Pac i f i c Northwest National Laboratory

/ a 6 i ?? Date

7 Date

k / z L h 7 Date

Analytical Chemistry Laboratory

HNF-EP-0857-2

CONTENTS

1.0 PURPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2.0 REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.2 CONTRACTED ANALYTICAL LABORATORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.3 VARIANCES TO THE STATEMENT OF WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

3.0 REGULATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3.1 RADIONUCLIDE AIR EMISSIONS REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3.2 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3.3 HANFORD SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3.4 EFFLUENT INFORMATION SYSTEM/ONSITE DISCHARGE INFORMATION

SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

4.0 ANALYTICAL LABORATORY SERVICES AND DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES . . . . . 2

5.0 GLOSSARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

6.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

TABLES

1 . Sample and A n a l y s i s C r i t e r i a f o r t h e 309 F a c i l i t y . . . . . . . . . . T-1 2 . T-2 3 . Sample and A n a l y s i s C r i t e r i a f o r t h e 327 F a c i l i t y . . . . . . . . . . T-3 4 . Sample and A n a l y s i s C r i t e r i a f o r t h e 340 F a c i l i t y . . . . . . . . . . T-4 5 . Sample and A n a l y s i s C r i t e r i a f o r t h e Fas t F l u x Tes t F a c i l i t y . . . . T-5 6 . Sample and A n a l y s i s C r i t e r i a f o r t h e 437 Maintenance and

7 . Environmental Release Summary Repor t ing Parameters . . . . . . . . . T-7

Sample and A n a l y s i s C r i t e r i a f o r t h e 324 F a c i l i t y . . . . . . . . . .

Storage F a c i l i t y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T-6

iii

HNF-EP-0857-2

This page intentionally left blank.

i v

HNF-EP-0857-2

1.0 PURPOSE

The purpose of this statement of work (SOW) is to establish laboratory analytical criteria and requirements for radioactive airborne emissions measurement sample and/or analysis activities.

2.0 REQUIREMENTS

2.1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

In accordance with Clean Air Act requirements [40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 61.93 and Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 246-2471, owners and operators of radioactive airborne emissions units are required to implement a quality assurance program for radioactive airborne emissions measurement activities. In accordance with these requirements, a Quality Assurance Project P1 an (WHC-EP-0528-2) has been prepared that governs the quality assurance activities associated with data collection and reporting o f radioactive airborne emissions measurements. Included in WHC-EP-0528-2 are requirements for the following:

Preparation of a SOW for the radioactive airborne emissions measurement program

Identification of analytical criteria and detection limits for laboratory radioanalytical services.

This document, prepared by Rust Federal Services of Hanford Inc. (RFSH), Air and Water Services (AWS), fulfills these stated requirements for the Project Hanford Management Contract (PHMC)-managed facilities i n the 300 and 400 Areas.

2 . 2 CONTRACTED ANALYTICAL LABORATORY

Analytical services for the radioactive airborne emissions measurement program for the PHMC-managed facilities in the 300 and 400 Areas are to be provided by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's (PNNL) Analytical Chemistry Laboratory.

2 . 3 VARIANCES TO THE STATEMENT OF WORK

Variances to this SOW must be documented by PNNL and approved or acknowledged by the PHMC AWS organization.

3 . 0 REGULATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The sample data, resulting from the radioactive airborne emissions measurement program for the PHMC-managed facilities in the 300 and 400 Areas,

1

HNF-EP-0857-2

support a number of regulatory reporting requirements. A description of the . required reports that this program supports is provided in the following sections.

3.1 RADIONUCLIDE AIR EMISSIONS REPORT

measurements results. estimate the annual effective dose equivalent (EDE) received by the hypothetical offsite highest receptor. reporting requirements of WAC 246-247, "Radiation Protection-Air Emissions", and the 40 CFR 61, "Protection of the Environment", "National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants", Subpart H, "National Emission Standards for Emissions o f Radionuclides Other Than Radon From Department of Energy Facilities".

This report documents Hanford Site radioactive airborne emissions Within this report, emissions measurements are used to

This report complies with the

3.2 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES REPORT

This annual report fulfills effluent discharge reporting requirements of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5400.1 and DOE Order 5484.1. This report summarizes the degree to which emissions of regulated substances (i .e., radioactive airborne emissions) from Hanford Site facilities comply with applicable regulatory limits.

3.3 HANFORD SITE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office to comply with the requirements of DOE Order 5400.1.

This report is compiled and published annually by PNNL for

3.4 EFFLUENT INFORMATION SYSTEM/ONSITE DISCHARGE INFORMATION SYSTEM

This report is transmitted electronically to Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) in Idaho Falls, Idaho for inclusion in the DOE effluent information systemlonsite discharge information System (EIS/ODIS) database. This report complies with the requirements of DOE Order 5484.1 and DOE Order 5400.1.

4.0 ANALYTICAL LABORATORY SERVICES AND DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES

PNNL's Analytical Chemistry Laboratory shall provide the following

Analytical services shall meet the analytical requirements listed in

analytical and data hand1 ing services.

Tables 1 through 6.

2

HNF-EP-0857-2

P N N L sha l l implement a qua l i t y assurance (QA) program t h a t meets the appl icable requirements of 40 CFR 61, Appendix B, Method 114, Section 4.0.

Q u a l i t y cont ro l tes t r e s u l t s and labora tory intercomparison scores sha l l be provided t o AWS upon reques t ; t h e t e s t s sha l l inc lude accuracy, prec is ion , and background.

Program coordinated by t h e DOE Environmental Measurements Laboratory, New York, New York, as appl icable f o r requested ana lyses .

PNNL sha l l p a r t i c i p a t e i n t h e DOE Inter-Laboratory Quality Assurance

Upon reques t , AWS sha l l be permitted t o review and approve t h e QA program.

P a r t i c u l a t e samples f o r t h e 340 Tank Vent Stack (340-NT-EX), 324 F a c i l i t y s t ack (ESP-324-01-S), 327 F a c i l i t y s t acks (ESP-327-01-S and ESP-327-02-D) sha l l be saved and composited f o r qua r t e r ly s p e c i f i c rad ionucl ide ana lyses . The composited samples sha l l be analyzed f o r plutonium-239/240, plutonium-238, americium-241, and cesium-137 i n accordance w i t h 40 CFR 61, Appendix B, Method 114 ( r e f e r t o t a b l e s ) .

In some cases , sample r a d i o a c t i v i t y l e v e l s might be i n s u f f i c i e n t t o allow f o r the de tec t ion of s p e c i f i c rad ionucl ides . Therefore, as a cos t savings measure, g ross a lpha /be ta measurements sha l l be performed on composite samples before performing s p e c i f i c analyses (not appl icable f o r gamma spectroscopy ana lyses) . I f i n s u f f i c i e n t r a d i o a c t i v i t y l e v e l s a r e present t o allow f o r poss ib le de tec t ion of t h e spec i f i ed rad ionucl ides , s p e c i f i c rad ionucl ide analyses sha l l not be not performed, unless otherwise d i r ec t ed by AWS. Conversely, s p e c i f i c rad ionucl ide analyses sha l l be performed when gross a lpha /be ta r a d i o a c t i v i t y l e v e l s a r e s u f f i c i e n t t o allow f o r poss ib le de tec t ion of s p e c i f i c rad ionucl ides .

90 percent (90% of samples analyses f o r each s t ack sha l l meet t h e minimum requirements es tab l i shed i n t h i s document).

Analytical r e s u l t s sha l l be expressed in the uni t s shown f o r t h e r e spec t ive minimum de tec t ab le concent ra t ions (MDC) i n Tables 1 through 6.

PNNL sha l l t ransmi t sample ana lys i s r e s u l t s t o AWS i n an e l e c t r o n i c format t h a t can be downloaded i n t o the environmental r e l ease summary (ERS) database. Table 7 l i s t s parameters f o r repor t ing da ta v i a t h e ERS database.

PNNL ana ly t i ca l da t a sha l l meet a minimum completeness c r i t e r i a of

All raw da ta and ana ly t i ca l r e s u l t s sha l l be re ta ined a s QA documents f o r a minimum of 5 yea r s , a s spec i f ied by 40 C F R 61, Subpart H and WAC 246-247 requirements. Upon reques t , AWS sha l l be provided with access t o t h e raw da ta and ana ly t i ca l r e s u l t s .

3

HNF-EP-0857-2

In t h e event t h a t alpha/beta a c t i v i t y i s de tec ted a t MDC l e v e l s o r g r e a t e r ( r e f e r t o Tables 1 through 6 ) , PNNL sha l l contac t AWS f o r guidance on performing follow-up ana lyses .

5.0 GLOSSARY

AWS

CFR

DOE DOE-RL

EDE EDP E IS/OD IS

E PA ERS

FFTF

HNF

INEL

MASF MDC

PHMC PNNL

QA

RFSH

sow

TT

cfm % flCi /cc

Air and Water Services

Code of Federal Regulations

U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Off ice

e f f e c t i v e dose equiva len t e l ec t ron ic da ta processing e f f luen t informati on systemlonsi t e discharge

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency environmental r e l ease summary

Fast Flux Test Facil i t y

Hanford Nuclear F a c i l i t y (document i d e n t i f i e r )

Idaho National Engineering Laboratory

437 Maintenance and Storage Faci 1 i t y minimum de tec t ab le concent ra t ions

Pro jec t Hanford Management Contract Pac i f i c Northwest National Laboratory

qua l i t y assurance

Rust Federal Services of Hanford Inc.

information system

statement of work

turnaround time (elapsed t ime, in days, from when a sample i s received by the labora tory un t i l t he ana lys i s i s reported t o AWS).

cubic f e e t per minute percent microcuries per cubic centimeter

4

HNF-EP-0857-2

6.0 REFERENCES

DOE Order 5400.1, Genera7 Environmental Protection Program.

DOE Order 5484.1, Environmental Protection, Safety and Health Protection

DOEJRL-96-68, Hanford analytical Services Quality Assurance Rzquirements

Information Reporting Requirements.

Documents, "Volume 4: Laboratory Technical Requirements , U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office.

WHC-EP-0528-2, Effluent Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan for Radioactive Airborne Emissions Data, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Ri chl and, Washington .

5

HNF-EP-0857-2

Th is page intentionally l e f t blank.

6

Table 1. Sample and Analysis Criteria for the 309 Facility.

309 Facility, 309-PRTR Stack

nominal gross a 2 cfm for period of gross 0 collection, unless otherwise indicated

SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS CRITERIA

<20% I Footnote b I 6 2.0 E-15 14

Unit price, $

100

a DOE/RL-96-68, Vol. 4, Table 7-1, states that duplicate analyses should have 4 0 % relative percent difference when the result is >5 times the minimum detectable activity.

Performance evaluation samplelanalysis results should meet the minimum acceptability scores specified by the required evaluation studies. specified in Section 4.0.

MDCs shall be as low as reasonably attainable, but shall not exceed the values specified in the table.

Evaluation study requirements are

Turnaround times are expressed as calendar days.

01 = alpha. 0 = beta. cfm MDC = minimum detectable concentrations % = percent. pCi/cc = microcuries per cubic centimeter. TT = turnaround time. < = less than. > = greater than.

= cubic feet per meter.

I z n t rn V

0 a, VI U

I N

Table 2. Sample and Anal ( S

Sample s i z e

324 FACICIT

anal ys i s

nominal 2.0 cfm f o r per iod o f c o l 1 ec t i on , unless otherwise i n d i c a t e d

I

"srd

i s C r i t e r i a f o r t h e 324 F a c i l i t y . set 1 o f 2 )

ESP-324-01-S Stack ANALYSIS CRITERIA

1 :1/2 !eks) 1 1.inEd_14 1 1 250 2.1 E-I5 Footnote e

1.9 E-I5 Footnote e 250 I / q u a r t e r )

( l / q u a r t e r )

(2/month) 24 1.5 E-9 45 750

4 1.9 E-I4 Footnote e 250

( I / q u a r t e r )

2.7 E-I4 2.3 E-14 5.9 E-I3 1.7 E-14

4 2.0 E-I5 Footnote e 250

a DOE/RL-96-68, Vol. 4, Table 7-1, s t a t e s t h a t d u p l i c a t e analyses should have t20% r e l a t i v e percent d i f f e r e n c e when the r e s u l t i s >5 t imes the minimum de tec tab le a c t i v i t y .

Performance eva lua t i on sample lanalys is r e s u l t s should meet t h e minimum a c c e p t a b i l i t y scores s p e c i f i e d by t h e requ i red eva lua t i on s tud ies . s p e c i f i e d i n Sect ion 4.0.

Eva lua t i on s tudy requirements a re

MDCs s h a l l be as low as reasonably a t t a i n a b l e , bu t s h a l l n o t exceed t h e values s p e c i f i e d i n the tab le .

HNF-EP-0857-2

T-2.2

Table 3. Sample and Analysis Criteria for the 327 Facility. (sheet 1 of 3)

327 FACILITY, ESP-327-01-S Stack

26

Sample size Type of analysis

and for period of collection, unless otherwise indicated

4 (l/quarter)

4 (l/quarter)

24 ( 2/mon t h )

4 (l/quarter)

4 (l/quarter)

I '"

2.1 E-15 Footnote e 250

1.9E-15 Footnote e 250

1.5E-9 45 750

1.9E-14 Footnote e 250

Footnote e 100

-

1.9 E-14 2.7 E-14

SAM!

Precisiona

4 (l/quarter)

<20%

2.0 E-15 Footnote e 250

E AND ANALY Accuracyb

Footnote b

S CRITERIA

I 2.0 E-15 I 14 I 100

2.3 E-14 5.9 E-13 1.7 E-14

I z n

m -0

0 a, vi

N

U I

--I W

N

Footnote b

Table 3. Sample and Analysis Criteria for the 327 Facility. (sheet 2 of 3)

327 FACILITY, ESP-327-02-V Stack

26 (1/2 weeks)

4 (l/quarter)

4 (l/quarter)

4 (l/quarter)

Sample size

iominal 2.0 cfm For period of :ollection, in1 ess itherwise indicated

Type of analysis

gross 01 and

gross I3 238pUd

241 Amd

"srd

239,240pUd

SAM1

Preci siona

<20%

(l/quarter)

MDCC (pci /dc)

and 2.0 E-15

1.9 E-14

2.1 E-15

1.9E-15

1.9E-14

1.9 E-14 2.7 E-14 2.3 E-I4 5.9 E-I3 1.7 E-14

2.0 E-15

Unit

- Footnote e I 250

Footnote e I 1;;- Footnote e

Footnote e 1 250-

I z -rl

rn W

0 m VI

u . N

Table 3. Sample and Analysis C r i t e r i a f o r t he 327 F a c i l i t y . ( shee t 3 of 3)

7 W

W

a DOE/RL-96-68, V o l . 4, Table 7-1, s t a t e s t h a t dupl ica te analyses should have <20% r e l a t i v e percent d i f f e rence when the r e s u l t i s >5 times the minimum de tec t ab le a c t i v i t y .

Performance eva lua t ion samplelanalysis r e s u l t s should meet the minimum accep tab i l i t y scores spec i f i ed by the required eva lua t ion s tud ie s . spec i f ied in Section 4.0.

MDCs sha l l be as low as reasonably a t t a i n a b l e , but sha l l not exceed the values spec i f ied i n the t ab le .

Sample analyses f o r t he spec i f ied rad ionucl ide sha l l be performed qua r t e r ly on a composite of the p a r t i c u l a t e samples co l l ec t ed during each qua r t e r o f the calendar year .

Note: allow f o r the de tec t ion of s p e c i f i c rad ionucl ides . g ross alpha/beta measurements sha l l be performed on composite samples before performing s p e c i f i c analyses (not appl icable f o r gamma spectroscopy ana lyses) . a c t i v i t y l e v e l s a r e present t o allow f o r poss ib le de tec t ion of t he spec i f i ed rad ionucl ides , s p e c i f i c radionuclide analyses sha l l not be not performed unless otherwise d i rec ted by AWS. Conversely, s p e c i f i c rad ionucl ide analyses sha l l be performed when gross alpha/beta a c t i v i t y l e v e l s a r e s u f f i c i e n t t o allow f o r poss ib le de tec t ion of s p e c i f i c rad ionucl ides .

The turnaround time f o r t h e I s t , Znd, and 3rd qua r t e r samples is 60 days. time f o r t h e 4th qua r t e r sample (10-1-97 through 12-31-97) i s 45 days.

Turnaround times a r e expressed as ca lendar days.

Evaluation study requirements a r e

His tor ica l da ta ind ica t e t h a t sample a c t i v i t y l e v e l s t y p i c a l l y a r e i n s u f f i c i e n t t o Therefore, a s a cos t savings measure,

I f i n s u f f i c i e n t

e The turnaround

‘ 01 = alpha. R = beta . cfm MDC = minimum de tec t ab le concent ra t ions . % = percent. pCi/cc = microcuries per cubic centimeter. TT = turnaround time. < = l e s s than. > = grea te r than.

= cubic f e e t per meter.

Table 4. Sample and Ana lys i s C r i t e r i a f o r t h e 340 F a c i l i t y . (sheet 2 o f 2)

340 FACILITY, 340-B-BLDG Stack

SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS CRITERIA

a DOE/Rl-96-68, Vol. 4, Table 7-1, states that dupl icate analyses should have <20% r e l a t i v e percent di f ference when the resu l t i s >5 times the minimum detectable a c t i v i t y .

Performance evaluation samplelanalysis resu l t s should meet the minimum accep tab i l i t y scores speci f ied by the required evaluation studies. Evaluation study requirements are speci f ied i n Section 4.0. T' MOCS sha l l be as low as reasonably attainable, but s h a l l not exceed the values speci f ied i n the table.

Sample analyses fo r the speci f ied radionuclide sha l l be performed quar te r l y on a composite of the pa r t i cu la te samples col lected during each quarter of the calendar year.

P

Iu

Note: radionuclides. before performing speci f ic analyses (not appl icable f o r g a m spectroscopy analyses). present t o al low for possible detection of the speci f ied radionuclides, spec i f i c radionuclide analyses sha l l not be not performed unless otherwise directed by AWS. alpha/beta a c t i v i t y levels are su f f i c i en t t o al low f o r possible detect ion o f speci f ic radionuclides.

The turnaround time f o r the 1st. 2nd. and 3rd quarter samples i s 60 days. (10-1-97 through 12-31-97) i s 45 days.

Turnaround times are expressed as calendar days.

H is to r i ca l data indicate that sample a c t i v i t y l eve l s t y p i c a l l y are i n s u f f i c i e n t t o allow f o r the detect ion of spec i f i c Therefore, as a cost savings measure, gross alpha/beta measurements sha l l be performed on composite samples

I f i nsu f f i c i en t a c t i v i t y levels are

Conversely, speci f ic radionucl ide analyses sha l l be performed when gross

e The turnaround time f o r the 4th quarter sample

01 = alpha. < = l e s s than. B = beta. > = g r e a t e r than. cfm MDC = minimum de tec tab le concentrat ions. % = percent . UCi/cc = m ic rocu r ies pe r cubic cent imeter . TT = turnaround t ime.

= cub ic f e e t p e r meter.

I m V

Table 5. Sample and Analysis C r i t e r i a f o r t he Fas t Flux Test F a c i l i t y . ( shee t 1 o f 2)

FFTF, FFTF-CB-EX Stack

nominal 2 cfm fo r period of col 1 ec t ion , unless otherwise indicated

SAMF

Sample size Type o f Precisiona ana lys i s

nominal 2 cfm gross 01 and f o r period of gross 13

unless

indicated

gross 01 and <20% Footnote b 52 2.0 E-15 14 100 gross 0 (l/week) and

1 .9 E-14

26 2.1 E-13 14 100 131 I (1/2 weeks)

E A N D ANALYSIS CRITERIA

Footnote b 52 2.0 E-15 14 100 (l/week) and

1.9 E-14

4f 1.5 E-9 60 750

26 2.1 E-13 14 100 (1/2 weeks)

I z -n

m Q

0

cn .I I N

a

Table 5. Sample and Analysis C r i t e r i a f o r t he Fast Flux Test F a c i l i t y . ( shee t 2 of 2 )

FFTF, FFTF-HT-TR Stack

Sample s i z e

nominal 2 cfm f o r period of co l l ec t ion , . unless otherwise ind ica ted

C

d

e

f

AND ANALYSIS CRITERIA

( 1 /week)

MDCC , yCi/cc

and 2 .0 E-15

1.9 E-14

DOE/RL-96-68, Vol. 4, Table 7-1, s t a t e s t h a t dup l i ca t e analyses should have <20% r e l a t i v e percent d i f f e rence when the r e s u l t i s >5 times t h e minimum de tec t ab le a c t i v i t y .

Performance evaluation samplelanalysis r e s u l t s should meet t he m i n i m u m accep tab i l i t y scores spec i f ied by the required eva lua t ion s tud ie s . spec i f ied in Section 4.0.

MDCs sha l l be as low as reasonably a t t a i n a b l e , but sha l l not exceed the values spec i f i ed i n the tab1 e .

Sample frequency may be reduced during t h e calendar year . A reduction in t h e sample frequency may r e s u l t i n l e s s samples de l ivered t o PNNL f o r ana lys i s .

Turnaround times a r e expressed as ca lendar days.

Four samples wi l l be co l lec ted during a 4 week period (1 sample per week). The samples sha l l be analyzed as a batch t o reduce ana ly t i ca l c o s t s per sample.

Evaluation study requirements a r e

= alpha. < = l e s s than. a I3 = beta . cfm MDC = minimum de tec t ab le concent ra t ions . % = percent. !JCi/cc = microcuries per cubic centimeter. TT = turnaround time.

= cubic f e e t per meter. > = g r e a t e r than.

I z 7

-0

0 W Ln U I N

rn

Table 6. Sample and Analysis Criteria for the 437 Maintenance and Storaqe Facility. (sheet 1 of 2)

MASF, 437-MN&ST Stack

Sampleslyea;

52 ( 1 /week)

(frequency)

2.0 cfm for gross 0 period of col 1 ection, unless otherwise

MDC', TTe,

2.0 E-15 14

yCi/cc (days)

and

SAMPLE AND ANALY!

Accuracyb

Footnote b

I

Samples/year MDC', TT~, Unit (frequency) pCi/cc (days) price, $

4 2.0 E-15 14 100 and

Sample size

Unit price, $

100

Type of analysis

MASF, 437-1-61 Stack

nominal gross a! 2 cfm for period of gross I3 collection, unless otherwise

Prec i si ona

120%

3

Table 6 . Sample and Analysis C r i t e r i a f o r t h e 437 Maintenance and Storage F a c i l i t y . ( shee t 2 of 2)

a DOE/RL-96-68, Vol. 4 , Table 7-1, s t a t e s t h a t dupl ica te analyses should have <20% r e l a t i v e percent d i f f e rence when the r e s u l t i s >5 times the minimum de tec t ab le a c t i v i t y .

Performance evaluation samplelanalysis r e s u l t s should meet t he minimum accep tab i l i t y scores spec i f ied by the required eva lua t ion s tud ie s . spec i f ied in Section 4.0.

MDCs sha l l be as low as reasonably a t t a i n a b l e , but sha l l not exceed t h e values spec i f i ed in the t a b l e .

Sample frequency may be reduced during the calendar year . frequency may r e s u l t in l e s s samples de l ivered t o PNNL f o r ana lys i s .

Turnaround times a re expressed as calendar days.

Evaluation study requirements a r e

A reduction in the sample

e

a = alpha. I3 = beta. cfm MDC = minimum detec tab le concent ra t ions . % = percent. pCi/cc = microcuries per cubic centimeter. T i = turnaround time. < = l e s s t h a n . > = grea te r than.

= cubic f e e t per meter.

I z -n

V

0 00 Ln U I N

rn

HNF-EP-0857-2

EDP code

F i l e t i t l e Stack code Companion Repor tab le o r f i l e s r a d i o n u c l i d e s

Stream code

Q u a r t e r l y , Composite

F024

F025 a1 H-3 oha I FFTF Combined Exhaust FFTF-CB-E F O l l H-3 F018

EP-324-01-S 324-01-S F028, F603

F026 I EP-327-01-S I 327-01-S I F029. F604 I a1D-l

F027 ~

EP-327-02-V 327-02-V F030, F605 a lpha b e t a

T-7.1

HNF-EP-0857-2

F025, F028

F026, FO29

F027, F030

F603, F025

EDP code

F603

F604

F605

F028

FO29

F030

I

Pu-238 Am-241 5r-90

P~-239,240 CS-137 cs-134 Eu-154 Eu-155 c0-60

Pu-238 Am-241 5r-90

Pu-239,240 cs-137 CS-134 Eu-154 Eu-155 c0-60

Pu-238 Am-241 5r-90

Pu-239,240 cs-137 CS-134 Eu-154 Eu-155 c0-60

H-3

Table 7. Environmental Re1 (shc

F i l e t i t l e

EP-324-01-S Q u a r t e r l y Composite

~~

EP-327-01-S Q u a r t e r l y Composite

EP-327-02-V Q u a r t e r l y Composite

EP-324-01-S H-3

EP-327-01-S H-3

309-PRTR

se Summary Repor t i ng t 2 o f 2)

Stack code o r

Stream code

324-01-S

327-01-s

327-02-V

324-01-S

. 327-01-S

309-PRTR

Parameters.

F604, F026

a lpha be ta

EDP = e l e c t r o n i c d a t a process ing. FFTF = Fast F l u x Test F a c i l i t y . MASF = Maintenance and Storage F a c i l i t y . MN&ST = Maintenance and Storage. NA = Not a p p l i c a b l e . PRTR = Pluton ium Recycle Test Reactor.

T-7.2

HNF-EP-0857-2

DISTRIBUTION

M r . A. W. Conk l in , Head A i r Emissions and Defense Waste Sec t ion D i v i s i o n o f R a d i a t i o n P r o t e c t i o n S t a t e o f Washington Department o f H e a l t h P. 0. Box 47827 Olympia, Washington 98504-7827

F l u o r Dan ie l Hanford. I n c . S. M. P r i c e

Rust Federal Serv ices o f Hanford I n c . R. B. B a r m e t t l o r L. D. Berneski W. R. Thackaberry W. E . Davis R. W. Szelmeczka L. P. D i e d i k e r B. P. G l e c k l e r E. M. Greager D. L. Ha lgren J. J. Luke J. K. Per ry

B&W Hanford ComDany E. J. B i t t e n B. C . Cornwel l N. R. Dah1 T. A. D i l l h o f f D. R. Ekstrom W. A. Hoober D. L. Johnson G. J. Lebaron M. S. Wr igh t 0. E. Rasmussen J. M. S t e f f e n

Lockheed M a r t i n Services. I n c . J . N. Diven C e n t r a l F i 1 es DPC

P a c i f i c Northwest N a t i o n a l Labora tory T. L. Almeida 0. P. Bred t L. R. Greenwood K . J. Kuh l -K l inger J. M. L a t k o v i c h R. G. Swoboda K. K . Thomas

16-04 16-04 H6-32 H6-20 16-05 53-95 53-95 H6-20 16-04 H6-25 H6-20

N1-41 15-70 N2-57 N2-57 16-52 11-03 11-05 56-15 11-02 N1-47 N1-47

H8-20 A3-88 A3-88

P7-25 P7-27 P7-22 P7-27 P7-27 P7-22 P7-22

D i s t - 1

HNF-EP-0857-2

DISTRIBUTION

Mr. A . W . Conklin, Head Air Emissions and Defense Waste Section Division of Radiation Pro tec t ion S t a t e of Washington Department of Health P . 0. Box 47827 Olympia, Washington 98504-7827

Fluor Daniel Hanford. Inc. S . M. Pr ice

Rust Federal Serv ices o f Hanford Inc. R. B. Barmettlor L . D . Berneski W . R. Thackaberry W . E. Davis R. W . Szelmeczka L . P. Diediker 8. P. Gleckler E. M. Greager D . L . Halgren J . J . Luke J . K . Perry

B&W Hanford ComDanv E. J . Bi t ten 8. C . Cornwell N . R. Dah1 T . A . Di l lhof f D. R. 'Ekstrom W . A . Hoober D . L . Johnson G . J . Lebaron M . S., Wright D. E. Rasmussen J . M . S te f fen

Lockheed Martin Serv ices , Inc. J. N . Diven Central F i l e s DPC

Pac i f i c Northwest National Laboratorv T . L . Almeida 0. P. Bredt L . R. Greenwood K . J . Kuhl-Klinger J . M. Latkovich R. G . Swoboda K . K . Thomas

16-04 16-04 H6-32 H6-20 16-05 53-95 53-95 H6-20 16-04 H6-25 H6-20

N1-41 15-70 N2-57 N2-57 16-52 11-03 11-05 56-15 11-02 N1-47 N1-47

H8-20 A3-88 A3-88

P7-25 P7-27 P7-22 P7-27 P7-27 P7-22

. P7-22

Dist-1