statistical methods for text mining david madigan rutgers university & dimacs madigan joint work...

63
Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS www.stat.rutgers.edu/~madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov, Aynur Dayanik, Dmitriy Fradkin David D. Lewis www.daviddlewis.com

Upload: melinda-morton

Post on 13-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Statistical Methods for Text Mining

David MadiganRutgers University & DIMACS

www.stat.rutgers.edu/~madigan

joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov, Aynur Dayanik, Dmitriy Fradkin

David D. Lewiswww.daviddlewis.com

Page 2: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Statistical Analysis of Text•Statistical text analysis has a long history in literary analysis and in solving disputed authorship problems

•First (?) is Thomas C. Mendenhall in 1887

Page 3: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Mendenhall•Mendenhall was Professor of Physics at Ohio State and at University of Tokyo, Superintendent of the USA Coast and Geodetic Survey, and later, President of Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Mendenhall Glacier, Juneau, Alaska

Page 4: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

X2 = 127.2, df=12

Page 5: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

•Used Naïve Bayes with Poisson and Negative Binomial model

•Out-of-sample predictive performance

Page 6: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Today

• Statistical methods routinely used for textual analyses of all kinds

• Machine translation, part-of-speech tagging, information extraction, question-answering, text categorization, etc.

• Not reported in the statistical literature (no statisticians?)

Page 7: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Outline• Part-of-Speech Tagging, Entity Recognition

• Text categorization

• Logistic regression and friends

• The richness of Bayesian regularization

• Sparseness-inducing priors

• Word-specific priors: stop words, IDF, domain knowledge, etc.

• Polytomous logistic regression

Page 8: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Part-of-Speech Tagging

• Assign grammatical tags to words• Basic task in the analysis of natural

language data• Phrase identification, entity extraction,

etc.• Ambiguity: “tag” could be a noun or a

verb• “a tag is a part-of-speech label” –

context resolves the ambiguity

Page 9: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

The Penn Treebank POS Tag Set

Page 10: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

POS Tagging Process

Berlin Chen

Page 11: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

POS Tagging Algorithms

• Rule-based taggers: large numbers of hand-crafted rules

• Probabilistic tagger: used a tagged corpus to train some sort of model, e.g. HMM.

tag1

word1

tag2

word2

tag3

word3

• clever tricks for reducing the number of parameters (aka priors)

Page 12: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

some details…Charniak et al., 1993, achieved 95% accuracy on the Brown Corpus with:

number of times word j appears with tag inumber of times word j appears

number of times a word that had never been seen with tag i gets tag inumber of such occurrences in total

plus a modification that uses word suffixes

r1 s1

Page 13: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Recent Developments

• Toutanova et al., 2003, use a dependency network and richer feature set

• Log-linear model for ti | t-i, w

• Model included, for example, a feature for whether the word contains a number, uppercase characters, hyphen, etc.• Regularization of the estimation process critical• 96.6% accuracy on the Penn corpus

Page 14: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Named-Entity Classification

• “Mrs. Frank” is a person• “Steptoe and Johnson” is a

company• “Honduras” is a location• etc.• Bikel et al. (1998) from BBN

“Nymble” statistical approach using HMMs

Page 15: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

• “name classes”: Not-A-Name, Person, Location, etc.• Smoothing for sparse training data + word features• Training = 100,000 words from WSJ• Accuracy = 93%• 450,000 words same accuracy

nc1

word1

nc2

word2

nc3

word3

11

1111 if ],|[

if ],|[],,|[

iiiii

iiiiiiiii ncncncncw

ncncncwwncncww

Page 16: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

training-development-test

Page 17: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Text Categorization•Automatic assignment of documents with respect to manually defined set of categories

•Applications automated indexing, spam filtering, content filters, medical coding, CRM, essay grading

•Dominant technology is supervised machine learning:

Manually classify some documents, then learn a classification rule from them (possibly with manual intervention)

Page 18: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Terminology, etc.•Binary versus Multi-Class

•Single-Label versus Multi-Label

•Document representation via “bag of words:”

•wi’s might be 0/1, counts, or weights (e.g tf/idf, LSI)

•Phrases, syntactic information, synonyms, NLP, etc. ?

•Stopwords, stemming

),,( 1 Nwwd 54 1010 N

Page 19: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Test Collections•Reuters-21578

•9603 training, 3299 test, 90 categories, ~multi-label

•New Reuters – 800,000 documents

•Medline – 11,000,000 documents; MeSH headings

•TREC conferences and collections

•Newsgroups, WebKB

Page 20: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Reuters Evaluation

•binary classifiers:

recall=d/(b+d)

precision=d/(c+d)

macro-precision = 1.0+0.5

micro-averaged precision = 2/3

true 0

true 1

predict 0

a b

predict 1

c d

cat 1 cat 2

test doc 1

test doc 2

truepredict

10

1 1 1

0 0

1

p=1.0 p=0.5r =1.0 r =1.0

2

F1 Measure – harmonic mean of precision and recall

“sensitivity”

“predictive value positive”

•multiple binary classifiers:

Page 21: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Reuters ResultsModel F1

AdaBoost.MH

0.86

SVM 0.84-0.87

k-NN 0.82-0.86

Neural Net 0.84

“Naïve Bayes”

0.72-0.78

Rocchio 0.62-0.76

Page 22: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Naïve Bayes•Naïve Bayes for document classification dates back to the early 1960’s

•The NB model assumes features are conditionally independent given class

•Estimation is simple; scales well

•Empirical performance usually not bad

•High bias-low variance (Friedman, 1997; Domingos & Pazzani, 1997)

X0

X1 X2 Xp...

Page 23: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Poisson NB

•Natural extension of binary model to word frequencies

•ML-equivalent to the multinomial model with Poisson-distributed document length

•Bayesian equivalence requires constraints on conjugate priors (Poisson NB has 2p hyper-parameters per class; Multinomial-Poisson has p+2)

X0

Xc1 Xc2 Xcp...

)(~ Cj

cj PoissonX

X0

X X

Page 24: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Poisson NB - ReutersModel μPrecisi

onμRecall

SVM 0.89 0.84

Multinomial

0.78 0.76

Poisson NB 0.67 0.66Multinomial+ logspline

0.79 0.76

Multinomial+ negative bin.

0.78 0.75

Negative Binomial NB

0.77 0.76

over-dispersion

Different story for FAA dataset

Page 25: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

AdaBoost.MH•Multiclass-Multilabel

•At each iteration learns a simple score-producing classifier on weighed training data and the updates the weights

•Final decision averages over the classifiersClass

A B C D

doc 1

+1 +1 -1 -1data

Class

A B C D

doc 1

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25initial weights

Class

A B C D

doc 1

2 -2 -1 0.1score from simple classifier

Class

A B C D

doc 1

0.02

0.82

0.04

0.12revised weights

Page 26: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

AdaBoost.MHSchapire and Singer, 2000

Page 27: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

AdaBoost.MH’s weak learner is a stump

two words!

Page 28: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

AdaBoost.MH Comments•Software implementation: BoosTexter

•Some theoretical support in terms of bounds on generalization error

•3 days of cpu time for Reuters with 10,000 boosting iterations

Page 29: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

•Documents usually represented as “bag of words:”

Document Representation

1( , , ,..., )i i j idx x xix

•xi’s might be 0/1, counts, or weights (e.g. tf/idf, LSI)

•Many text processing choices: stopwords, stemming, phrases, synonyms, NLP, etc.

Page 30: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

•For instance, linear classifier:

Classifier Representation

IF ,THEN 1

ELSE 1

j i j ij

i

x y

y

• xi’s derived from text of document

• yi indicates whether to put document in category

• βj are parameters chosen to give good classification effectiveness

Page 31: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

•Linear model for log odds of category membership:

Logistic Regression Model

( 1| )ln

( 1| )i

j i jji

P yx

P y

i

ii

xβx

x

• Equivalent to

( 1| )1i

eP y

e

i

i

βx

i βxx

• Conditional probability model

Page 32: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

•If estimated probability of category membership is greater than p, assign document to category:

Logistic Regression as a Linear Classifier

IF ln ,THEN 11j i j i

j

px y

p

•Choose p to optimize expected value of your effectiveness measure (may need different form of test)

•Can change measure w/o changing model

Page 33: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Maximum Likelihood Training

• Choose parameters (βj's) that maximize probability (likelihood) of class labels (yi's) given documents (xi’s)

arg max ( ln(1 exp( )))Ti

i

y iβ

β x

• Maximizing (log-)likelihood can be viewed as minimizing a loss function

Page 34: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Hastie, Friedman & Tibshirani

Page 35: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

► Subset selection is a discrete process – individual variables are either in or out. Combinatorial nightmare.

► This method can have high variance – a different dataset from the same source can result in a totally different model

► Shrinkage methods allow a variable to be partly included in the model. That is, the variable is included but with a shrunken co-efficient

► Elegant way to tackle over-fitting

Shrinkage Methods

Page 36: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

subject to:

2

1 10

ridge )(minargˆ

N

i

p

jjiji xy

p

jj s

1

2

Equivalently:

p

jj

N

i

p

jjiji xy

1

22

1 10

ridge )(minargˆ

This leads to:

Choose by cross-validation.

yXIXX TT 1ridge )(ˆ works even when XTX is singular

Ridge Regression

Page 37: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Gaussian

tau

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Gaussian

tau

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Gaussian

tau

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Gaussian

tau

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Gaussian

tau

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Gaussian

tau

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Gaussian

tau

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Gaussian

tau

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

-0.1

0-0

.05

0.0

00

.05

0.1

0

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3

intercept

npreg

glu

bp

skin

bmi/100

ped

age/100

Page 38: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

22

2

20

),0(~

),(~

with ridgeas same

N

xNy

j

Tii

Ridge Regression = Bayesian MAP Regression

►Suppose we believe each βj is a small value near 0

►Encode this belief as separate Gaussian probability distributions over values of βj

►Choosing maximum a posteriori value of the β gives same result as ridge logistic regression

Page 39: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

subject to:

2

1 10

ridge )(minargˆ

N

i

p

jjiji xy

p

jj s

1

Quadratic programming algorithm needed to solve for the parameter estimates

qp

jj

N

i

p

jjiji xy

1

2

1 10 )(minarg

~

q=0: var. sel.q=1: lassoq=2: ridgeLearn q?

Least Absolute Shrinkage & Selection Operator (LASSO)

Page 40: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Laplace

lambda

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Laplace

lambda

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Laplace

lambda

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Laplace

lambda

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Laplace

lambda

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Laplace

lambda

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Laplace

lambda

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

Posterior Modes with Varying Hyperparameter - Laplace

lambda

po

ste

rio

r m

od

e

-0.1

0-0

.05

0.0

00

.05

0.1

0

120 100 80 60 40 20 0

intercept

npreg

glu

bp

skin

bmi/100

ped

age/100

Page 41: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,
Page 42: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,
Page 43: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

► Lasso estimates are consistent

► But, Lasso does not have the “oracle property.” That is, it does not deliver the correct model with probability 1

► Fan & Li’s SCAD penalty function has the Oracle property

Ridge & LASSO - Theory

Page 44: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

► New geometrical insights into Lasso and “Stagewise”

► Leads to a highly efficient Lasso algorithm for linear regression

LARS

Page 45: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

► Start with all coefficients bj = 0

► Find the predictor xj most correlated with y

► Increase bj in the direction of the sign of its correlation with y. Take residuals r=y-yhat along the way. Stop when some other predictor xk has as much correlation with r as xj has

► Increase (bj,bk) in their joint least squares direction until some other predictor xm has as much correlation with the residual r.

► Continue until all predictors are in the model

LARS

Page 46: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,
Page 47: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Zhang & Oles Results

•Reuters-21578 collection•Ridge logistic regression plus feature selection

Model F1Naïve Bayes 0.852

Ridge Logistic Regression+FS

0.914

SVM 0.911

Page 48: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Bayes!

• MAP logistic regression with Gaussian prior gives state of the art text classification effectiveness

• But Bayesian framework more flexible than SVM for combining knowledge with data :– Feature selection – Stopwords, IDF– Domain knowledge– Number of classes

• (and kernels.)

Page 49: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Data Sets

• ModApte subset of Reuters-21578– 90 categories; 9603 training docs; 18978

features

• Reuters RCV1-v2– 103 cats; 23149 training docs; 47152 features

• OHSUMED heart disease categories– 77 cats; 83944 training docs; 122076 features

• Cosine normalized TFxIDF weights

Page 50: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Dense vs. Sparse Models (Macroaveraged F1,

Preliminary)ModApte RCV1-v2 OHSUME

D

Lasso 52.03 56.54 51.30Ridge 39.71 51.40 42.99

Ridge/500

38.82 46.27 36.93

Ridge/50 45.80 41.61 42.59

Ridge/5 46.20 28.54 41.33

SVM 53.75 57.23 50.58

Page 51: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

01

23

4

ModApte (90 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

ridge lasso SVM

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

02

46

8

RCV1-v2 (103 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

ridge lasso SVM

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

23

45

67

OHSUMED (77 categories)

log(

Num

ber

of E

rror

s +

1) p

lus

jitte

r

ridge lasso SVM

Page 52: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

ModApte - 21,989 features

Number of Features w ith non-zero posterior mode

Num

ber

of C

ateg

orie

s

0 100 200 300 400 500

05

1015

20

RCV1 - 47,152 features

Number of Features w ith non-zero posterior mode

Num

ber

of C

ateg

orie

s

0 500 1000 1500

02

46

810

OHSUMED - 122,076 features

Number of features w ith non-zero posterior mode

Num

ber

of C

ateg

orie

s

0 200 400 600 800 1000

02

46

812

Page 53: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Bayesian Unsupervised Feature Selection and

Weighting• Stopwords : low content words that

typically are discarded– Give them a prior with mean 0 and low

variance• Inverse document frequency (IDF)

weighting– Rare words more likely to be content

indicators– Make variance of prior inversely proportional

to frequency in collection• Experiments in progress

Page 54: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Bayesian Use of Domain Knowledge

• Often believe that certain words are positively or negatively associated with category

• Prior mean can encode strength of positive or negative association

• Prior variance encodes confidence

Page 55: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

First Experiments

• 27 RCV1-v2 Region categories• CIA World Factbook entry for country

– Give content words higher mean and/or variance

• Only 10 training examples per category– Shows off prior knowledge– Limited data often the case in applications

Page 56: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Results (Preliminary)

Macro F1 ROC

Gaussian w/ standard prior

0.242 87.2

Gaussian w/ DK prior #1

0.608 91.2

Gaussian w/ DKprior #2

0.542 90.0

Page 57: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Polytomous Logistic Regression

• Logistic regression trivially generalizes to 1-of-k problems– Cleaner than SVMs, error correcting codes, etc.

• Laplace prior particularly cool here:– Suppose 99 classes and a word that predicts class 17– Word gets used 100 times if build 100 models, or if

use polytomous with Gaussian prior– With Laplace prior and polytomous it's used only once

• Experiments in progress, particularly on author id

Page 58: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

1-of-K Sample Results: brittany-lFeature Set %

errors

Number of Features

“Argamon” function words, raw tf

74.8 380

POS 75.1 44

1suff 64.2 121

1suff*POS 50.9 554

2suff 40.6 1849

2suff*POS 34.9 3655

3suff 28.7 8676

3suff*POS 27.9 12976

3suff+POS+3suff*POS+Argamon

27.6 22057

All words 23.9 52492 89 authors with at least 50 postings. 10,076 training documents, 3,322 test

documents.

BMR-Laplace classification, default hyperparameter

Page 59: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

1-of-K Sample Results: brittany-lFeature Set %

errors

Number of Features

“Argamon” function words, raw tf

74.8 380

POS 75.1 44

1suff 64.2 121

1suff*POS 50.9 554

2suff 40.6 1849

2suff*POS 34.9 3655

3suff 28.7 8676

3suff*POS 27.9 12976

3suff+POS+3suff*POS+Argamon

27.6 22057

All words 23.9 52492 89 authors with at least 50 postings. 10,076 training documents, 3,322 test

documents.

BMR-Laplace classification, default hyperparameter

4.6 million parameters

Page 60: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Future

• Choose exact number of features desired• Faster training algorithm for polytomous

– Currently using cyclic coordinate descent

• Hierarchical models– Sharing strength among categories– Hierarchical relationships among features

• Stemming, thesaurus classes, phrases, etc.

Page 61: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Text Categorization Summary

• Conditional probability models (logistic, probit, etc.)

• As powerful as other discriminative models (SVM, boosting, etc.)

• Bayesian framework provides much richer ability to insert task knowledge

• Code: http://stat.rutgers.edu/~madigan/BBR

• Polytomous, domain-specific priors soon

Page 62: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

The Last Slide• Statistical methods for text mining work well on certain types of problems

• Many problems remain unsolved

•Which financial news stories are likely to impact the market?

•Where did soccer originate?

•Attribution

Page 63: Statistical Methods for Text Mining David Madigan Rutgers University & DIMACS madigan joint work with Alex Genkin, Vladimir Menkov,

Approximate Online Sparse Bayes

Shooting algorithm (Fu, 1988)