statistical quality control · techniques in shoe manufacturing for quality improvements sisay...
TRANSCRIPT
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 7 No. 6, 2019 ISSN 2056-5860 ISSN 2056-5860
Progressive Academic Publishing, UK Page 37 www.idpublications.org
STUDY ON THE APPLICATION OF STATISTICAL QUALITY CONTROL
TECHNIQUES IN SHOE MANUFACTURING FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS
Sisay Addis
School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Institute of Technology
Debre Markos University, Debre Markos
ETHIOPIA
ABSTRACT
This article presents the application of statistical quality control (SQC) techniques for solving
rework/rejection of leather components in footwear manufacturing company by taking Peacock
footwear company as a case study. Data were collected by direct data intake from production
shop floor and pulled up data from company’s database. The observed data were analyzed using
SQC tools. Origin 8 and SPSS software’s were used for the data analysis. Control charts revealed
that the production process of the company is found out-of-control situation as some points outlie
control limits. The study also determined the most frequently occurring type of defects using
Pareto analysis. Three type of defects (Skipped stitches, Wrinkle not cut and Thread not cut)
were identified as the most frequently occurring defects that are accounted for 72% of the total
problems. Furthermore, cause & effect diagram is constructed through brainstorming sessions to
identify potential causes of the defects. The company needs to alleviate the causes so that overall
performance of the company can be improved.
Keywords: Ethiopia, footwear, statistical quality control (SQC), control chart, Pareto diagram.
1. INTRODUCTION
The tannery operation consists of converting the raw skin (a highly putrescible material) into
leather (a stable material). The leather material is used for the manufacturing of a wide range of
products like footwear, leather cloth, general goods, etc. The orientation of finishing tanneries
has altered over the last few decades. Nowadays, tanneries produce leather material mainly for
footwear, garments, general goods, furniture manufacturers and automotive upholstery
manufacturers. Of which, the footwear subsector has grown considerably fast. About 65% of the
world production of leather is estimated to go into leather footwear production (Netsanet, 2014).
The production of leather footwear plays a considerable role in the development process of both
developing and developed countries (Ulutas and Islier, 2015). The total export of leather
footwear in the world is US $47 billion. China is the leading exporter of footwear with total
market share of 22% followed by Italy, which accounts a value of 15%. Vietnam, Hong Kong,
Germany and Belgium follow with footwear export share of 8%, 7.8%, 4.4%, and 3.9%,
respectively. On the contrary, Africa’s share of footwear export is mere 1.3% (LIDI, 2012). In
general, the total production of leather and leather products in Africa is much lower qualitatively,
quantitatively and value-wise (Mwinyihija, 2012). Seizing the global market opportunities has
remained the key challenge, irrespective of having large resource endowment to satisfy raw
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 7 No. 6, 2019 ISSN 2056-5860 ISSN 2056-5860
Progressive Academic Publishing, UK Page 38 www.idpublications.org
material needs. Africa contains 21% of the livestock population in the world (UNIDO, 2010).
Reducing the gap between resources and production is critical for the development of the leather-
processing countries in Africa. Ethiopia is one of the leading leather processing countries in
Africa (Addis et al., 2019). The leather industry in Ethiopia puts at the forefront of the African
leather sector in line with its current comparative advantage for the raw material needs.
Availability of large livestock population constituted the country's comparative advantages for
the development of leather sector in Ethiopia. Ethiopia has the major comparative advantage to
satisfy global raw material requirements (1st in Africa and 10th in the world in livestock
population) (UNIDO, 2010). The livestock population growth trend (cattle, sheep and goat) also
shows potential of the sector to be the main economic source of the country in the future. The
livestock population escalated from 54.5 million in 1995/96 to 77.5 million in 2005/06 to 103.5
million in 2012/13 (Leta and Mesele, 2014). This resource potential makes the leather industry to
be a good candidate for a concerted effort to expand production and achieve competitiveness at
the international level.
Despite the above mentioned indigenous resource potentials, the leather industry of Ethiopia
is yet to utilize its resources to appreciable extent. It significantly lags behind many countries
that are less abundantly endowed with their indigenous resources (Netsanet, 2014). The tannery
and footwear producers operate at 44.97% and 47.6% of the daily production capacity,
respectively. For the period of 2005-2009, footwear producers performed, on average, only
27.55% of the planned export value (LIDI, 2012). Also, actual average production of the
footwear industry is far below the international benchmark standards. For instance, in 2009, the
footwear producing companies perform 4 pairs of shoe/day/person, which characterized low
operational performance and production efficiency as compared to best practices (i.e. 16 pairs of
shoe/day/person) (Cherkos, 2011). Studies revealed that the industry faces serious problems,
both in the production of raw materials and in the manufacturing stages (Addis et al., 2017b).
Apart from dozens of issues, quality related problems have been identified as the major obstacle
for performance of the industry (Addis et al., 2017a) and sometimes the challenge is referred as
“low-quality trap” (Altenburg, 2010, p. 9). In peacock footwear company of Ethiopia, quality
related problems are easily identifiable when daily recorded production data is investigated. The
company tried to implement quality circle in the production rooms. However, rework and
rejections are easily identifiable at every corner of the production departments, which affect the
total manufacturing performance. The quality inspection is normally carried out after mass
production of footwear is finished. The rework/reject level of the company is 5%, while the
international benchmark target is <3% (Chekos, 2011). This arise the need to study stability of
the production process and identify causes of quality problems in the company. Accordingly, the
main objective of this article is to evaluate quality performances of the company using statistical
quality control tools. Specifically, the study set the following objectives: (1) to study process
stability of the company, (2) to find the most frequently occurring types of defects, and (3) to
identify the potential causes of the defects.
The rest of the paper has been organized as follows. Sections 2 presents the concept of
control charts. Section 3 presents the research methodology, followed by data analysis and
discussion in Section 4. Subsequently, conclusion is presented in Section 5.
2. CONCEPT OF QUALITY CONTROL CHARTS
Quality is seen as a strategic issue of any organizations. Organizations should consider effective
tool to maintain quality and win their competitors. Statistical quality control (SQC) deals with the
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 7 No. 6, 2019 ISSN 2056-5860 ISSN 2056-5860
Progressive Academic Publishing, UK Page 39 www.idpublications.org
questions how to monitor, control and improve the quality of products and manufacturing
processes by means of statistical methods. SQC and improvement includes, primarily, the areas of
statistical control charts, acceptance sampling and Pareto diagram (Smith, 1994). Control charts
are commonly used in production environments to analyze process parameters to determine if a
process is actually within or out of control. The control chart for industrial SQC was invented by
Dr. Walter A Shewhart in 1924. Recognizing that all production processes will show variation in
product, Shewhart described two sources of variation; namely: variation due to chance causes
(called common causes) and variation due to assignable causes (called special causes). Chance
causes are inherent of a production process and caused by regular sources within the process or its
environment; whereas, assignable causes, if they exist, can be traced to a particular machine, a
particular worker or a particular material (Benneyan, 1998). According to Shewart, if variation in
product is only due to chance causes, then the process is said to be in statistical control (Smith,
1994). The term 'statistical control' refers to the stability and predictability of a process over time
and to the type of variability that exists.
Control charts are based on the Central Limit Theorem, which means the sampling
distribution follows the normal distribution. Once normality of the measurements has been
confirmed, the trial control limits for the individual values are commonly established. The
control limits are then usually set equal to the centerline plus three (upper control limit (UCL))
and minus three (lower control limit (LCL)) theoretical standard deviations of the plotted values
(Benneyan, 1998). A basic form of a control chart can be shown in Figure 1. The construction of
control charts is based upon statistical principles. The charts used in this research require normal
distribution of data. The centerline in Figure 1 could represent an estimate of the mean, standard
deviation or other statistics. The curve to the left of the vertical axis should be viewed relative to
the upper and lower control limits. There is very little area under the curve below the LCL and
UCL. This is desirable as areas under a curve for a continuous distribution represent
probabilities. Since a process or a property is out of statistical control when a value is outside the
control limits, quality control requires that the probability for such an event to occur be small.
Figure 1: Basic form of a control chart (David, 2003)
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 7 No. 6, 2019 ISSN 2056-5860 ISSN 2056-5860
Progressive Academic Publishing, UK Page 40 www.idpublications.org
A process is considered to be in statistical control if all of the plotted values are fall between
the UCL and LCL over a sufficient span of time (Corbett and Pan, 2002). The idea of the control
chart is 'proactive', in the sense that it is intended to monitor processes, signal when they go 'out
of control' and thereby ensure quality products. Any out-of-control points for which assignable
causes can be found should be removed or eliminated. When a process does go out of control, it
is wise to have a rational method of detecting this, so that the situation can be corrected as soon
as possible. Consequently, supplementary rules were invented to increase the chances of
detecting out of control situations (see Table 1). (Stuart et al., 1996). The long-term objectives
are to tighten the control limits by reducing process variation and to move the centerline so that
the process is operating closer to some target value (Benneyan, 1998).
Table 1: Criteria for not being in a state of statistical control
S.N. Control chart out-of-control signals
1 Any single subgroup value outside either control limit
2 Eight consecutive subgroups on one particular side of the centerline (CL)
3 Twelve of fourteen consecutive subgroups on one particular side of the centerline
4 Three consecutive subgroups beyond 2 standard deviations on a particular side of the CL
5 Five consecutive subgroups beyond 1 standard deviation on a particular side of the CL
6 Thirteen consecutive subgroups within +1 standard deviation (on both sides) of the CL
7 Six consecutive subgroups with either an increasing or decreasing trend
8 Cyclical or periodic behavior
There are different types of control charts. The most frequently used charts are the X-bar
chart and p-charts. All of the other types of control charts are derivatives of these charts. The
present study will focus on np chart. The np chart is used to evaluate process stability when
counting the number of defectives. The np chart is useful to track the number of defective units
in a sample of units (rather than the proportion of defective units). The np chart always requires a
fixed sample size. Formulas for np chart are given in Equation 1, Equation 2 and Equation 3.
Once the control limits (i.e. UCL, CL and LCL) are established for the np chart, these limits may
be used to monitor the number nonconforming going forward. When a point is outside these
control limits, it indicates that the number of nonconforming units of the process is out-of-
control. An assignable cause is suspected whenever the control chart indicates an out-of-control
process.
)3......(..........................................................................................)1(3
)2...(........................................................................................................................
)1.....(..........................................................................................)1(3
ppnpnLCL
pnCL
ppnpnUCL
−−=
=
−+=
where, n is the sample size and p is the number of defective units in a sample of units.
3. METHODOLOGY
The study considered Peacock footwear company in Ethiopia. The company was selected
because it represents large to medium sized footwear companies and a major shoe exporter in
Ethiopia. Specifically, the study focused on one product model, i.e. Bades shoe model (article
number 6104). This product model was selected because it is on the production line for the
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 7 No. 6, 2019 ISSN 2056-5860 ISSN 2056-5860
Progressive Academic Publishing, UK Page 41 www.idpublications.org
recent past years, a product has high demand and whose data is accessed easily. Data were
collected by direct data intake from production shop floor, internal company documentation and
pulled up data from company’s database. Physical observation of the company was potentially
enabled to observe reworks and rejected leather components in the shop floor. Data were
collected for leather cutting and stitching departments of the Peacock footwear company. The
basic flow chart of leather footwear manufacturing process is shown in Figure 2. The collected
data were analyzed using SQC tools such as control chart and Pareto diagram. Origin 8 and
SPSS software’s were used for the data analysis. In addition, brainstorming sessions were
conducted with the production department heads, production planning personnel, benchmarking
personnel and general/deputy managers to generate concrete ideas towards identifying the
quality related problems and the possible causes. The brainstorming sessions enabled to build a
cause-and-effect diagram. Then, a systematic approach of training followed by plan-do-check-act
(PDCA) was proposed as an improvement strategy to alleviate causes of the problems.
Figure 2: Basic flow chart of leather footwear manufacturing process
4. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
In this section, a step-by-step procedure is described for applying control charts. The procedure
is illustrated using data from the cutting and stitching departments of Peacock leather footwear
manufacturing company.
4.1 Control chart for cutting department
Step 1. Collect the data using an appropriate data sheet
The quality indicator to be monitored and controlled is rework/rejects in the production process.
Taking a constant sample size of 100, rework/reject data were taken for 26 days and trial limits
were developed. The data is presented in Table 2, with the UCL & LCL (±3 sigma limits) and
warning lines (±2 sigma limits).
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 7 No. 6, 2019 ISSN 2056-5860 ISSN 2056-5860
Progressive Academic Publishing, UK Page 42 www.idpublications.org
Table 2: Rework/reject data in the cutting department
Sample
number
Stitching Rejects UCL
+2
Sigma
+1
Sigma Average -1 Sigma
-2
Sigma LCL
1 100 11.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
2 100 15.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
3 100 8.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
4 100 9.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
5 100 14.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
6 100 10.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
7 100 9.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
8 100 11.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
9 100 7.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
10 100 19.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
11 100 18.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
12 100 17.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
13 100 15.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
14 100 18.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
15 100 11.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
16 100 16.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
17 100 18.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
18 100 12.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
19 100 19.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
20 100 19.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
21 100 10.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
22 100 8.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
23 100 11.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
24 100 14.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
25 100 12.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
26 100 7.000 23.089 19.726 16.363 13.000 9.637 6.274 2.911
Total
338
Step 2. Examine the distribution of the data and plot the data on np chart
Control chart for the cutting department is shown in Figure 3. The figure shows that all the
sample points are randomly scattered and fall in between ±2-sigma limits. According to the out-
of-control signals (see Table 1), the production process in the cutting department is statistically
in control.
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 7 No. 6, 2019 ISSN 2056-5860 ISSN 2056-5860
Progressive Academic Publishing, UK Page 43 www.idpublications.org
Figure 3: Control chart of cutting department
4.2 Control chart for stitching department
Step 1. Collect the data using an appropriate data sheet
The quality indicator to be monitored and controlled is rework/rejects in the production process.
Taking a constant sample size of 100, sample was taken for 26 days. Data for the number of
rework/rejects in the stitching department are presented in Table 3, with the trial control limits
(UCL & LCL) and warning lines (±2 sigma limits).
Table 3: Rework/reject data in the stitching department
Sample
number
Sample
size Rejects UCL
+2
Sigma
+1
Sigma Average
-1
Sigma
-2
Sigma LCL
1 100 16.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
2 100 9.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
3 100 12.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
4 100 8.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
5 100 11.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
6 100 7.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
7 100 3.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
8 100 5.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
9 100 8.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
10 100 14.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
11 100 6.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
12 100 11.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
13 100 6.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
14 100 7.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
15 100 9.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
16 100 5.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
17 100 12.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 7 No. 6, 2019 ISSN 2056-5860 ISSN 2056-5860
Progressive Academic Publishing, UK Page 44 www.idpublications.org
18 100 18.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
19 100 20.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
20 100 9.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
21 100 22.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
22 100 20.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
23 100 20.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
24 100 17.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
25 100 10.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
26 100 7.000 20.703 17.546 14.388 11.231 8.073 4.916 1.758
Total
292.000
Step 2. Examine the distribution of the data and then plot the data on np chart
An out-of-control condition happens either when one or more points fall beyond the control
limits, or when the plotted points exhibit some nonrandom pattern of behavior. The control chart
for the stitching department is shown in Figure 4. It can be seen that observation 21 is an outlier
as it lies above the UCL. Also, six consecutive points (i.e. 21st - 26th observations) shows a
decreasing trend. According to the signals presented in Table 1, the process is found in out-of-
control condition for which a corrective action has to be taken, and hence step 3 is executed.
Figure 4: Control chart of stitching department
Step 3. Establish the trial control limits for the np charts by eliminating the out-of-control points
Analysis of out-of-control situations in Step 2 needs to be addressed in order to improve the
stability of the process. The out-of-control points should be eliminated to develop trial limits for
future monitoring. The revised control chart is shown in Figure 5. After removing the outlier, all
points fall within the UCL and LCL. However, still a trend is revealed in the revised control
chart. This might be happened because of the reason that same type of defective raw material
was used for successive days of the production of leather footwear. The raw material, i.e. leather,
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 7 No. 6, 2019 ISSN 2056-5860 ISSN 2056-5860
Progressive Academic Publishing, UK Page 45 www.idpublications.org
might have scratches, cuts or marks, which collectively make the cut components have low
quality level.
Figure 5: Revised control chart for stitching department
4.3. Pareto analysis
The Pareto principle is a 20/80 rule, which states that: “20 percent of the problems have 80
percent of the impact” (David, 2003). The present study conducted Pareto analysis for the
stitching department. Pareto Analysis states that 80% of quality problems in the end product or
service are caused by 20% of the problems in the production or service processes. In practice it is
beneficial to separate “the vital few” problems from “the trivial many” (Samadhan et al., 2013).
The first attempt is to find the most frequently occurring defects and then rank them according to
their economic impact. The process in the stitching department were found in out-of-control
situation. 12 types of defects were identified that are responsible for the instability of the process
in the stitching department. A one-month data of the defects are collected with their frequency of
occurrence (see Table 4). The Pareto diagram is shown in Figure 6. It is revealed that the three
defect types (Skipped stitches>1, Wrinkle not cut and Thread not cut) are the vital few that
results 72% of the total problems in the stitching department. In the other words, if these three
types of defects are alleviated, the company can resolve 72% of its problems.
Table 4: Type of defects with their frequency of occurrence in stitching department
No Type of defects Frequency % defective % cumulative
1 Skipped stitches>1 208 26 26.0%
2 Wrinkle not cut 199 24.8 50.8%
3 Thread not cut 170 21.2 72.0%
4 Uneven stitch length 45 5.61 77.7%
5 Improper skiving leaving impression
on upper
40
4.99 82.6%
6 Backer not caught in stitching 32 3.99 86.6%
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 7 No. 6, 2019 ISSN 2056-5860 ISSN 2056-5860
Progressive Academic Publishing, UK Page 46 www.idpublications.org
7 Stitch too far or too close to edges 25 3.12 89.8%
8 Edge colorings after stitching 20 2.49 92.3%
9 Stitch not locked at end 18 2.28 94.5%
10 Stitch not per marking 18 2.28 96.8%
11 Thread not matching lining color 14 1.74 98.5%
12 Broken stitch 12 1.49 100.0%
Figure 6: Pareto chart for stitching department
4.4. Cause and effect analysis
Scholars stated that while Pareto analysis helps to prioritize the most pressing problem, the C&E
diagram helps to lead to the root cause of that problem (Adrian, 2000). Cause and effect (C&E)
analysis usually comes from a brainstorming session, which helps to identify and isolate causes
of a problem. Brainstorming is a tool used by teams to bring out the ideas of each individual and
present them in an orderly fashion to the rest of the team. The key ingredient is to provide an
environment free of criticism for creative and unrestricted exploration alternative solutions to
problems (Adrian, 2000). The C&E diagram shown in Figure 7 were constructed by quality
improvement team through brainstorming sessions involving all operators taking part in the
related production and test activities. The C&E diagram shows major factors that can cause
reworks/rejections of leather components in the production process of Peacock shoe factory.
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 7 No. 6, 2019 ISSN 2056-5860 ISSN 2056-5860
Progressive Academic Publishing, UK Page 47 www.idpublications.org
Figure 7: Cause and effect diagram
Increased
rework/reject
Line workers’ skill
problem
Work nature
Lack of
sharing ideas
Lack of training
Lack of
supervision
Lack of praising
good job
Social interaction
Lack of
knowledge
Carelessness of
employees
Lack of job
security
Low salary &
benefit
packages
Poor working
environment
Purchasing
problem
Absence of
quality expert
Defective raw
material
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 7 No. 6, 2019 ISSN 2056-5860 ISSN 2056-5860
Progressive Academic Publishing, UK Page 48 www.idpublications.org
5. Conclusion
A high frequency of rework/rejections are warnings of quality related problems and if not
addressed, may lead customers to find alternatives competitors. Particularly, quality control in
leather footwear industry are perhaps difficult because various factors such as scratches and ticks
on raw material may affect quality of the finished product. Causes of quality problems have to be
identified and eliminated to maintain quality and win competitors in the field. In this study,
rework and rejections have been identified as quality problems in Peacock footwear company in
Ethiopia. The quality control charts were used to investigate process situations in the cutting and
stitching department. It is revealed that the process is out-of-control as some points are found out
of the control limits and some trends showed something is wrong in the process. The revised
control limits have been determined by eliminating the out-of-control points, and then all the
points fall within the UCL and LCL. The study also determined the most frequently occurring
type of defects using Pareto analysis. Three type of defects (Skipped stitches, Wrinkle not cut
and Thread not cut) are the most frequently occurring defects accounted for 72% of the total
problems in that department. Furthermore, cause & effect diagram is constructed through
brainstorming sessions to identify potential causes of the defects. The company needs to alleviate
the causes so that overall performance of the company can be improved.
References
Addis, S., Dvivedi, A., & Beshah, B. (2017a) Identifying and prioritising operational
performance indicators of the Ethiopian leather industry. Int. J. Productivity and Quality
Management, 22(3),378–394.
Addis, S., Dvivedi, A., & Beshah, B. (2017b) Decision-making on job satisfaction improvement
programmes using fuzzy QFD model: a case study in Ethiopia. Total Quality Management &
Business Excellence, 1-24. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2017.1354693.
Addis, S., Dvivedi, A. & Beshah, B. (2019) Quality management as a tool for job satisfaction
improvement in low-level technology organizations: the case of Ethiopia. Production
Planning & Control. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1574510.
Adrian F. (2000) The Brainstorming Myth. Business Strategy Review, 11(4), 21-28.
Altenburg T. (2010) Industrial policy in Ethiopia”, German Development Institute, Discussion
Paper, Germany, Bonn, ISBN 978-3-88985-477-3. [Accessed 15th July 2019] Available from
World Wide Web:https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/115489/2010-02e.pdf
Benneyan, J. C. (1998) Use and interpretation of statistical quality control charts. Int J Qual
Health Care, 10(1), 69-73.
Cherkos T. (2011) Performance Analysis and Improvement of Ethiopian Leather Footwear
Factories: With Special Reference to Anbessa Shoe SC”, M.Sc. Thesis, AAU, Ethiopia.
Corbett, C. J., & Pan, J. N. (2002) Evaluating environmental performance using statistical
process control techniques. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(1), 68-83.
David H. (2003), The Basics of Statistical Process Control & Process Behaviour Charting, A
User’s Guide to SPC, 1st Edition, Published by Management-New Style.
Leta, S. & Mesele, F. (2014) Spatial analysis of cattle and shoat population in Ethiopia: growth
trend, distribution and market access. Springer Plus, 3(1), 310.
LIDI (2012) Value chain analysis on leather garment & goods sub sector in Ethiopia,
unpublished report, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol. 7 No. 6, 2019 ISSN 2056-5860 ISSN 2056-5860
Progressive Academic Publishing, UK Page 49 www.idpublications.org
Mwinyihija, M. (2012) East Africa’s leather sector initiative towards value addition; Kenya as a
Case study. Presented during the 18th Session of the UNIDO Leather and Leather Products
Industry Panel, Shanghai/China.
Netsanet J. P. (2014). Impact of Supply Chain and Industrial Cluster on the Competitive
Advantage of Ethiopian Leather Sector. Ph.D. Thesis, AAU, Ethiopia.
Samadhan et al. (2013) Quality improvement in manufacturing processes using SQC tools.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA), 3(3), pp.832-837.
Smith, A. E. (1994) X-bar and R control chart interpretation using neural computing. The
International Journal of Production Research, 32(2), 309-320.
Stuart, M., Mullins, E., & Drew, E. (1996) Statistical quality control and
improvement. European journal of operational research, 88(2), 203-214.
Ulutas, B. & Islier, A. A. (2015) Dynamic facility layout problem in footwear industry. Journal
of Manufacturing Systems, 36, 55-61.
UNIDO (2010) Future trends in the world leather and leather products industry and trade
[Accessed 12th June 2019] Available from World Wide Web:.https://leatherpanel.org/.