stats group - subsea uk
TRANSCRIPT
© STATS GROUP
STATS GROUPProcess & Pipeline Integrity Solutions
Pressurised Pipeline Repair or Modification
Enabled by Double Block And Bleed Isolation Tools
Dale MillwardDirector – EPRS & Subsea Services
© STATS GROUP
Reasons for pipeline repair or modification
RISK level - ALARP
Double Block Isolation Tools – Piggable and non Piggable
Repair or Modification Scenarios
• Valve Replacement/Installation
• Pipeline Tie Ins
• Retrospective installation of pigging facilities
• Dead leg Removal
Recent Case Study – pipeline tie in.
Short Animation
Q&A
Presentation
© STATS GROUP
Valve replacement or installation
Reasons for Repair or Modification
36” ESDV Replacement 36” SSIV Installation
© STATS GROUP
Making pipelines piggable / Removing unpiggable features
Reasons for Repair or Modification
Retrofitting pigging facilities
© STATS GROUP
Tie-in of new pipeline to existing
Reasons for Repair or Modification
© STATS GROUP
Removal of dead legs - due to accelerated corrosion rates in stagnant piping
Reasons for Repair or Modification
Replacement of a damaged section
© STATS GROUP
Initially, it may be considered that the safest way to repair or modify a pipeline is todepressurise it and remove all hydrocarbon content, prior to doing the work; i.e. It hasa risk level that is As Low as Possible.
However, this may not be the safest method, or the way that has a residual risk levelthat is As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP).
The risks associated with ceasing production, depressurising, hydrocarbon removal,dewatering and starting up again need to be properly assessed.
The following factors should also be assessed:
• Discharge to the environment
• Risks associated with decommissioning and recommissioning work scopes
• Stopping downstream production
• Flow assurance issues
• Out of service time
Following a proper risk assessment it could be decided that depressurising the entirepipeline is not the safest overall way of doing the work– or it does not have residual risk
that is ALARP.
So, what's the safest way ?
© STATS GROUP
If it turns out that it is not reasonably practicable to depressurise and hydrocarbon freethe pipeline then it may be necessary to break containment while the pipeline ispressurised and contains production inventory;
If the system has insufficient existing methods of isolation, then a temporary, fail safe,pressure capable, isolation tool, complying with industry isolation standards andrecommended practices will be required - typically a double block tool, where bothbarriers are fully proven in situ (in the isolation position).
Double Block Isolation Tool
The next section of this presentation will introduce isolation tools that provide therequired level of isolation and explain how they can be assessed to provide an isolationbarrier that is deemed to reduce the risk to As Low As Reasonably Practicable.
ALARP - Isolation
© STATS GROUP
Isolation Guidance
Industry isolation guidance specifies:
A proved DBB Isolation exists where the sealing integrity of two separate isolation barriers are proven before the isolation is relied upon.
Each part of the isolation should be proved separately.
BOTH isolation seals must be proven using full isolated pressure in the correct direction.
This level of isolation ensures that no single isolation barrier failure will endanger the worksite.
© STATS GROUP Slide: 10
Type Approved
Double Block Isolation tools
Tecno Plug™BISEP™ (Branch Installed Self Energised Plug)
DNV·GL TYPE APPROVAL for Pipeline Isolation Plugs
Type Designations BISEP™ and Tecno Plug™
Complying with DNV-OS-F101, DNV-RP-F113 & ASME VIII div. 2
© STATS GROUP
BISEP™
Proved Double Block Isolation
In Situ Test Sequence
Tecno Plug™
Secondary Seal Integrity Test
Pressure locked in the annulus Pressure behind vented,
Secondary seal tested with: Full differential pressure in correct direction
Page. 11
© STATS GROUP
Primary Seal Integrity Test
Pipeline pressure in frontAnnulus pressure vented
Primary seal tested with: Full differential pressure in correct direction
BISEP™ Tecno Plug™
Page. 12
Proved Double Block Isolation
In Situ Test Sequence
© STATS GROUP
Self-energisation feature maintains safe isolation while differential pressure
(above the verified minimum pressure) exists across the tool
The Isolation plug has two separate activation mechanisms – Dual Redundant Activation
The Isolation tool is
• activated and held in place by internal hydraulics
• and it is energised and mechanically locked in by differential pressure
Both separate activation mechanisms need to be removed to unset the plug
Tecno Plug™ Self Energisation
Self Energisation, Failsafe Feature
© STATS GROUP
In the unlikely the event of control system failure or possibly flat batteries, the PassiveUnset feature ensures the Tecno Plug™ is always recoverable upon job completion.
Passive unset is achieved by raising the tail pressure to equalise with the head pressure.
This de-latches the locked in hydraulic pressure; it is open circuited to return.
Equalising the pressure removes self –energisation force.
Once equalised the plug will then passively unset – without any active control input
NOTES:
• Isolation cannot be unset until the breaking containment operation is completed and the pressure behind the plug is raised to pipeline isolated pressure.
• If the pressure is equalised, the plug will become unset unless it is actively commanded not to unset.
• The passive unset is done in a safe and controlled manner only when the pressure is equalised across the tool.
PASSIVE UNSET
Fail-Safe Unset and Recovery Feature
© STATS GROUP Slide: 15
Scenarios
Valve Replacement
BISEP™ and Tecno Plug™ used together to replace receiver and kicker line valves
without affecting production
Tecno Plug™ Isolation of 36” gas export pipeline for SDV replacement
© STATS GROUP Slide: 16
Pipeline Tie In
24” pipelines tied into existing 36” trunk lines
© STATS GROUP Slide: 17
Removing Un-piggable features
Retrofitting Pigging Facilities
© STATS GROUP Slide: 18
Removing Dead Legs
With the isolation tools installed and tested. Dead legs were removed.
Flange were welded on so new valves could be installed.
Repeated at 12 similar locations
© STATS GROUP Slide: 19
Case Study
Subsea pipeline tie in
Following animation will run through how this was achieved
© STATS GROUP