stmu law, exam bank, procedure 2, flint, fall 1989

35
FINAL EXAM Procedure II - Fall 1989 Professor Richard E. Flint The examination consists of two essay questions of equal value. I would suggest that you read the fact patterns very carefully and answer each question fully and concisely. As law- yers make their living not only through their oral skills, but also through their written word, I expect a well written answer. Good luck and happy holidays! ion No . 1: Joe “General” Sherman (“Sherman”), a resident of the state of Pennsylvania who had n~b~en in the state of Texas nor had he eve Qn~3acLed~anybu~fless in Texas, was driving his white steed (a “Corvette”) through Texarkana, Texas late one afternoon after havin~ pillaged (“gotten drunk”) in Little Rock, Arkansas, when his collided with a vehicle owned by Robert E. Lee, V, (“Lee”) and driven by his fiancee, Southern Mist (“Mist”). Sherman immediately floor boarded his steed and headed back to Arkansas with the express intent of never visiting the Lone Star state again. One and a half years later, Lee sued Sherman in a county court—at—law in Texarkana, Texas (which had subject matter jurisdiction over all cause of action where the amount in contro- versy was less than $50,000.00) seeking to recover property dam- age for his vehicle. In his petition, he alleged the court had per~9~kjurisdiction over Sherman pursuant to the Texas Lona_Arm statute and asked that the clerk serve citation on Sherman by serving the chairman of the State Highway and Public Transporta- tion Commission in Austin, Texas. He further alleged that the defendant Sherman had been negligent in driving his vehicle and that such negligence was a proximate cause of the damage to his car in an amount of $25,000.00. He also sought attorneys fees in the amount of $26,000.00. Although attorneys’ fees are not recoverable in this type of action, Lee’s lawyer thought that they were. Sherman subsequently received by 6~l~ United States mail the citation from the State Highway andWfflic Trans- portation Commissions office and threw it in the trash can with- out reading it or consulting an attorney as to the legal effects of the citation. The sheriff’s return indicated that the State Highway and Public Transportation Commission was served on Decem- ber 1, 1989. Lee took a default judgment against Sherman for $25,000.00 in property damage and $25,000.00 in attorneys’ fees on December 16, 1989. The district clerk failed to notify Sherman of the judgment. Sherman was then served a new citation,.. 1 ~ in his ident state in a suit to enforce the judgment filed thirty 31 days later. Sherman hired a lawyer to defend the suit. e lawyer filed an answer stating that the initial 6EXAM 1

Upload: others

Post on 12-Nov-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

FINAL EXAM

Procedure II -Fall 1989

Professor Richard E. Flint

The examination consists of two essay questions of equalvalue. I would suggest that you read the fact patterns verycarefully and answer each question fully and concisely. As law-yers make their living not only through their oral skills, butalso through their written word, I expect a well written answer.Good luck and happy holidays!

ion No . 1:

Joe “General” Sherman (“Sherman”), a resident of the stateof Pennsylvania who had n~b~en in the state of Texas nor hadhe eve Qn~3acLed~anybu~fless in Texas, was driving his whitesteed (a “Corvette”) through Texarkana, Texas late one afternoonafter havin~ pillaged (“gotten drunk”) in Little Rock, Arkansas,

when his collided with a vehicle owned by Robert E. Lee, V,(“Lee”) and driven by his fiancee, Southern Mist (“Mist”).Sherman immediately floor boarded his steed and headed back toArkansas with the express intent of never visiting the Lone Star

• state again. One and a half years later, Lee sued Sherman in acounty court—at—law in Texarkana, Texas (which had subject matterjurisdiction over all cause of action where the amount in contro-versy was less than $50,000.00) seeking to recover property dam-age for his vehicle. In his petition, he alleged the court hadper~9~kjurisdiction over Sherman pursuant to the Texas Lona_Armstatute and asked that the clerk serve citation on Sherman byserving the chairman of the State Highway and Public Transporta-tion Commission in Austin, Texas. He further alleged that thedefendant Sherman had been negligent in driving his vehicle andthat such negligence was a proximate cause of the damage to hiscar in an amount of $25,000.00. He also sought attorneys feesin the amount of $26,000.00. Although attorneys’ fees are notrecoverable in this type of action, Lee’s lawyer thought thatthey were. Sherman subsequently received by 6~l~ UnitedStates mail the citation from the State Highway andWfflic Trans-portation Commissions office and threw it in the trash can with-out reading it or consulting an attorney as to the legal effectsof the citation. The sheriff’s return indicated that the StateHighway and Public Transportation Commission was served on Decem-ber 1, 1989. Lee took a default judgment against Sherman for$25,000.00 in property damage and $25,000.00 in attorneys’ feeson December 16, 1989. The district clerk failed to notifySherman of the judgment. Sherman was then served a new citation,..1 ~

in his ident state in a suit to enforce the judgment filedthirty 31 days later. Sherman hired a lawyer to defend thesuit. e lawyer filed an answer stating that the initial

6EXAM 1

Page 2: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

II Fall 1989

~ssor Richard E, Flint Final Exam

judgment was based on defective pleadings because the petitionwas vague and ambiguous and subject to special exceptions. Whilehe was defending that lawsuit in Pennsylvania, Sherman hired aTexas lawyer who advised him that he needed to file a ‘writ oferror” in Texas in order to preserve his rights. He instructedthe attorney to file the writ of error. While both of these pro-ceedings were pending, Sherman then filed his own lawsuit in dis-trict court of Texarkana, Texas against Lee and Mist to recoveryfor personal injury damages. His petition claimed that Mist hadfailed to stop at a stop sign and that as a result the collisionoccurred, He sought a judgment against Lee and Mist, jointly andseverally. Both Mist and Sherman filed their answers anddefended the suit.

Assume that the statutes, rules, and case law Pidenticalin Texas and Pennsylvania. Please discuss what additional argu-ments you would make in defense of the lawsuit in Pennsylvaniaand whether any of such arguments would be successful. Pleasestate whether the writ of error would be successful (and why orwhy not). In the event that Sherman lost both of theabove—referenced suits, what additional legal advice, if any,could you give Sherman? If you were Lee and Mist’s lawyers statewhat defenses you would assert, if any, in the lawsuit beingbrouaht aaainst them in the district cqart of Texarkana, Texas,~sul~. _________

Question No. 2:

In January 2, 1989, Yankee National Bank (“Bank”) regretta-bly in Lubbock, Texas made four separate loans to Bubba Jackson

“Bubba”), the great-grandson of T. J. “Stonewall” Jackson(“Stonewall”), each in the amount of $1,000.00 and each due withinterest and principal on June 1, 1989. Bubba (unlike his bril-liant great—grandfather) took the money, went to Las Vegas andlost it. Thus, he was unable to pay the Bank its money back whenit made demand. Bubba was a resident of Jackson, Mississippi andother than the transaction described above, his recollection wasthat he had never in his entire life been in Texas nor had heconducted any business operations in Texas. The Bank hired DirtyRotten Yankee (“Dirty Rotten”) to pursue the litigation againstBubba. Dirty Rotten (whose intelligence level was just belowthat of a rock) decided to file a lawsuit in Lubbock districtcourt on the first note. His pleadings were proper and the ser-vice was made on the Secretary of State who subsequently for-warded the citation to Bubba-in Jackson. Bubba hired a Texaslawyer to file a Rule 120(a) motion on his behalf. The Rule120(a) motion stated that Bubba was not amenable to servicebecause he had never been in the state of Texas and because therewere numerous defects in the service. The alleged defectsincluded the fact that a copy of the petition was not attached tothe copy of the citation, the date of issuance of the citation

• was blank, the name of the District Clerk was not on the form,and the citation was directed to the Secretary of State. Dirty

SEXAM ®r~

Page 3: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

ledure II~fesscr Richard E. Flint

Fall 1989Final Exam

Rotten having made a large political contribution to the districtjudge was able to the get the clerk of the court to set the spe-cial appearance down for hearing without giving any notice toBubba ‘s lawyer. The special appearance was overruled and adefault judgment was entered as Bubba’s lawyer had failed to filean answer. Shortly upon learning of this disastrous occurrence,Bubba’s lawyer filed an injunction suit in another county to stopenforcement of the first judgment as the sheriff was about readyto execute that judgment on a piece of property allegedly ownedby Bubba (his aunt had left it to him but had not told him). Thecourt granted the injunction finding that the judgment of thedistrict court in Lubbock was void. At this time, Dirty Rottenfiled a second lawsuit in another Texas district court to recoverunder the second note. The lawyer for Bubba filed an answer thatcontained only special exceptions to the plaintiff’s pleadingsand a general denial. He immediately requested a hearing on thespecial exceptions which the court granted, and without givingthe Bank leave to amend, dismissed that lawsuit. Dirty Rottenwas now extremely frustrated and decided to file a third lawsuiton the third note. By this time, Bubba had conceded that he wasamenable to the jurisdiction of the Texas courts but wanted to besued in a county other than that in which suit had been filed.The notes required that payments be made in Dallas County asopposed to Lubbock County where the third suit was filed. Hisattorney then filed an answer which contained only a generaldenial and various affirmative defenses (I hope you know which

• ones they should be). Subsequent to that time, he amended hispleadings seeking to assert a Motion to Transfer Venue to DallasCounty. That case finally went to trial. During the trial ofthe lawsuit the Plaintiff sought to introduce evidence that wasnot ~in his pleadings. Bubba’s lawyer did nothing.Then questions (special issues) were proposed by both theplaintiff’s lawyer and Bubba’s lawyer based on his pleadings.There were no objections to the questions (issues). The jurycame back and nailed Bubba to the floor and a judgment was pre-pared. At this time, Bubba’s lawyer objected on the grounds that

~f\ the judgment did not conform to the plaintiff’s pleadings. Afourth lawsuit was then filed by the Bank. Bubba~s lawyeranswered and filed a counter—claim against the Bank alleging alender—liability claim (usury) on all four notes. The courtafter a non-jury trial denied the bank recovery on the note andentered judgment on Bubba’s counter-claim.

Discuss all procedural problems generated by this fact situ-ation. Specifically take each lawsuit (all five of them) anddiscuss in detail (1) the va-lidity of the court’s judgment ororder; (2) what remedies, if any, are available for the party orparties adversely affected by such action; and (3) what should bethe final outcome of each lawsuit.

7..

I

S6EXAN 3—

Page 4: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

S

‘C”

c

9

4C

c-I

H

C

--CSC

P.-)

S

¶~C

~J.

~

~

.-.--~

.,(c_~-

3~(-3~~

n~

~t:

~

ç~~

i~~~

~

~

~

~~

~fl~~

~ ~

cLt~c

~:~

C

c~

~~.:

S~(3

c~~

7~~

:~.

~-

t-n.-’

c-4

!~T

c~s

~

~

~:~

~~i~-.5

--~

~~S~~~L~-~

~:

~‘

I~

L

~~~5’~c-:

~ .

~hJ~:en.~:

~~

..

~~-.

~~4

~~~

.~ ~

~N

~

~~~:

~2~~~

:2tFc~)

~.

~TCt

TI

~ .~

~T

.

~~~

~~~-:

~C~

~Ejf44~.1

Cs

t

ci

CT.1

Page 5: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

awnat~ ~ ~~—s~’— — -..-— ,

S

pC ~ThC--

C--,’1—

C-’--

C

-~

S~~h

~C-

~

E

~)

(J~

tT)(~

I2~

~E.

<i..

*pP

C

&r

S

2

C°T~J

C

(-(k

I‘7

.

-~ ‘‘-l

IC

F>,Lr

CL

~Th

£PSC-:’

Page 6: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

“ ~tt~t::.t. S-. - -, -

4--c,

~~

5

~,

~

~~,:f

~r-r~

c~

~-

C)..~:~-

t~

*-

~~

s

2

3~Sc~

*

~

~~t:.

2—

-

CC

JI

,

~

I~~

-~y~)

>.,d

~-

C:;~

4k’

1

~~

~-(I~)

EP~

I,’-‘SQ

~.:

‘-~

6 ~(-t-.-

‘-

I~L

-C

:~j~L~

~

L c.-\~~3

C-

-C-

1- —

H5)

‘--‘-3

F>

P.’ -

—j?~1~-

-j~

.C

~—c’

~Cf~_

&&C-)

C~

-3~

t

TI~33cc,

~ftc~~c,

cJ~:-?tL

\‘

C_~C--

-1C3,

C~

I.~

C~

~(‘C)

R

Page 7: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

STikç)--

~~

Cs-.--__)

~*>

E~

~$~C—(__.

--.

p

i-:C:~çN\

1~.~--

ci-P~)

‘-‘:~

~

L~

1~IEmC..‘÷-

~----r~c.

?~cn~m

C~>pi-k::)--k--

~

~~~-j

cr~

~

:-~j

Hi--

~--

C--’fl

~

cT-3’~

JP

-

—----r’-c~

~?£~-

~:~

c~ç,:3~,ia\

~ rEN

-. —

--

Th;-tci

--

-C~H~

-t.c~

.51

cts~C>-,’(-- —(-. ~

~ç53~

‘—.

51)J”~

RH

c:~)

cK3,C::i

-3~&

t-~

~~t~CTh~(Thr~

-

- -x

-Hb.C-

C-- IHiC.

Pp

Ct’

6

-zC-

.

I

S

cC

C

C

3

C

-t

Icm

3

--3’

-3

)

4>

Cr)

I:~- 3 C --

C- •.-

c’---. C”)- CC~r

Page 8: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

. -~

--4- ~Q-C NJ

- C-3’ -~ 3- Th C

5± 3

P 3 C

-~

51-- c~ CS CT~ C)-- C. ‘Ti-C ~ 1~~~-3

C, t” ‘— C’ ~N ---{

PSI) - ‘ C

7C-’- ~ C1 (0CL —ccm - cc <-\ C)

cj -~ ,-E~ SI

Cm k ~.3

C C a CI)

-) C - C” CT4~. _c,’

- ‘~ ‘-‘C ~4-~ (t -:p.-- -~

S---~t:~ .T~-..— ~ i~ fr.--

1

C)

~i7C

TI

Page 9: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

S S

P ~-w- (._~ C,

CT -cC-

9I— -— t C-)

C. ;4~_~ €—=~ ~ e-

C’) - -~5 S-P 2TI - -P ~---- C- _j —.

C yj. FCS ‘~ ~-- H-c> C~’ - -~-,

~) -, i”- C-—p

P -p Cc- t

P L-~ 6E P CC) Cc9- 51) C-c

C* ~ 3 2’

2 C- --

~E C-TIm c-~ —~ ~c

PH

Page 10: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

C ~c~4cd ‘yko ~cS-~v3def

~L(TtD~ V ~yJ~L

fad~~ ~ ~ U~S-3kA~t~Ck/CL,- -- -

cm 4C tR~c-~~- u~S-cEL~~

1L~~~ffl~’’4 ~kJ)1i~~ kJPL~ --

CL:

7~5LC€-

5~: cwt~

~çcU&-~-’thrt4~v: DL LLa±ms1

OL ~ u-7-~

cc. 1~Dd~tkLL~*c~0j ~

* LL[ (Lf~c~ tL—L

&~‘k-Sc (XtJd

S--J E~hCS~C)~1~jrSd

‘-C -

tL~ic~.W-~C5SO~- QLt

uJL~ iEL-~1ti:c4- c/fr

COP C-1±tASi

5

S

Page 11: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

— -~n -t-~-- - -~

S

Hrcc-’ ‘S--> i<- H- —5 (~ C.-

/ —(i-- Cl.

(U ~ C’>

CSc C

C:. ~

F>-, ~_ 22 1

C -- \__

C CS- H cm C

~L ~

/ ~-

H

c

5-~G)

- - I--

-~-- ~CS:

p

___5- CS7~

I L~J’~4-~~~. -

S

Yç1-

C:

IF>

C---’C—

CL

C)CC.

51

ccC~

--Pm

Ccc--

SC)

2----C

Page 12: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

S ~ -

(

~h-+

~R

~g

~r(I)--

m

~‘3

~~

~,

c~

~

~~~~

-~)

r

~I

(-3 T“‘-

Iw~

~~~

~

~~

~

~:~-

~~:

J~c’---

~~-

~

~Cr~

N

2~C

~

~:C’)

~.‘~

C~

t‘

--

CL

~

~~

~

~7i4

~ci.43

~

5~I

-~

t~xC-~

~

~-~

~~

C

~Th~

c

S-~~

çj~--

~~-

ç~:~)

~:I

~J

C34j~

~~

~

~

-~-

~ç~~L

~

C-~H-~

~

~)

~

~)~

~°~

S

Page 13: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

S S

P CmC:

- C)-

F:’ ~—‘ -C) )

- S CF>

9 II) C) )-i-

~ C~--~ c’ -~

H:- C)p p (~ (p -

(U N~ ~-, ~-:

- p -

F - --CT --

- ~ 4h~cII.I:~I 1~~~s4~ - I - I

Page 14: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

H

- —--—-- ______51 - C -

~ L~ f~4~ ~ ~L~d

~C~5o _-- - -k - ~ -1147Th

C’, j . .3~ ccu~ iS-S- ~ --

h ~Ht~cc7J t~~--47-IJ$s ~S-* S CT AL cn~iI5t~L.CL-

r~ !C~iCL0:U

\-~S-CS-C~C) 9~CLYJ C~c’-~

Ct

tT.Y ~uU~3iH I tu cH~j3?~C’~~

~iji& Pi~LrLLL~J*UJ—T-i 4

ItI- 5~S-HAACsC’~ ~S-~S-~~-vCSll

S

< A A

Page 15: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

o ~ - •~~--- ~ ~ta

C ~4- cm ---- - -H- -c. 9 -p C,

C’ — C CA C—

-~ ~5 AC P CL

F> P 5 0 C)c HP ---4-~ S 51 C:7<>— - -- -, 5) -‘

F *A~ -

S P1~Cj

P1 CS-

(r

5 (~

C s—- --~

C

H :- “—sC.) .. ‘-‘3

Page 16: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

S

2

CI5 c~ ~, I 5~ A -~P 5~, ~)J p.. ‘ - p. ~—

F> p C-’) CL, 5m 5 -HcCIY ci a5 r

- ~

ICC- H? P ,~ F

p ‘3 9 - Ac”

t~-’,-.\....::~A-.Th. ~ ..-~ - --i.--~.-51<-----I-i.~ I.: -

Page 17: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

Q

4-4:

YC)C—

I.

I . -I”—

— ~—77;- —

H-f-cm

-:35

C -~

F

C

C—

rTbCSC--

C-C-

C..

C—

“C,—

C-...)

-s

S

51>

Cr)

C--

V

‘H(17

I-

I

C---

A C-,C

C.. --

E

C’-

47

cui-\

Cs

4ci

S—

ElCc-k

C- l-_)

~

C~

- ~~Ii~ - -l -

S

C)-

C’

(C-.)

H

1

Page 18: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

_______ -I L ~. ~•. 1. ~ J....._L. -a~L_&~ I... 1 ~Iigt_tiuirJt

S

C-CSI

F’

pcc,p

CS

(‘3

C)

7--’

‘H3

C?-,

C

(Th

C)C-

A

ci

C..-,--

<~-k.

C-)

C’)

Cl’C-

C-.,-

C-,.”

(7)

C

C-)

‘-C)

C-’)

C -\

p

-S-(S’)I—-.

7—

C:---

(-‘3)-‘I--C-

17,

---p

AL

C—)7<-’

(C--

Cc—-)

C(-4-3

17:

ct>‘-‘C,.

p

P-C

S

C—

-S-C)

51

PT

C——

V

Cc,

c-i,--

pC—

tt

VArc’)

L

~c1.

c-C ---‘--

C

p

-ThC-)

F4,

-P:5

1CL

H::3

I

I

(f-s

I.-

Cs)

C-

C--C

C

C’

Cr)

AL

C~i‘4,

Page 19: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

~C:7hd:>i:—J:—> ~ •k~~’4..’’.’..-~-. .S S S

P -P P P- Cr

-4, - - C C- C C -

- r,_.C1~ ()7~ C C c--i ck- C - H: C- ‘~- ~ -~

S A- 47 p -

4 CC- 5C) ct 6L. ~ 0 - H

- (7) 4~1 (-)~ ) 4—

C) -5 P ---- C~ ~1~>

- 7Th c__) ~ --7 p P 5p Ct.. 51 ---C ~— l~- -

L-fl C 17> C. :3 N-,. - 17

17 -- A5 IA

S

4

Page 20: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

I. SC

47 7)C 5 4 F

51 C- N-t C) I —>4 -5 ~L: —~ P

C, ~ TH - CS 4) P —— C-) C ,-. ci ~C-C’ C ---i -, - —

C) ‘-- ~ (~ “- CP P-- 4 -tm A- i-; F3 k--- 5 CC c

E1 -

17-Tm ., Cr - C2 C)C C-~ C ~- - 7--I - A

HC -a

H~- 5’ 5 5 -3

:3 ( 51 I

- C I C’ I ~ /

Page 21: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

________ I ‘ ‘Is.—~ “I $t’~1Jdfliá?hAjhj!e4j a.ssrt!4. .4t~.-

2

‘--3

C)

(./)

c

t

F.17

-cAt-

(k~s

C

(\)

C—

51

I~c~)

F>

9-

rc

C

kC

S .

P S

CF‘-/7

SI’(

CSC)

A-

cv~

C

LI)’ CSC

Page 22: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

In I C P

P

c—. --__ 2 9___ ---1— hm t’ C C

__ r C

__ -~ -~-

__ cç~ ~E)

___ Ft__ c~’. C____ (A~ C.~ V_I

___ ç k ci

__ Li P

I ____ -__ 0__ ~I ~ -~ ~ ~---~ it I_____ C-:’, C ~t1— r--~ L ( ~ r ‘-‘_____ L C’ -~- . -----~___________

Page 23: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

-Th

C—-.

C(_ _)

C)

2C.C— -~

I 9

C

C.-

(5

C--,

*

ci-

Ci)

C—.

C—

C:

~

ft.c~)

i_i_i

-Q

8-

F:

C

Itr

(5

C

5A

tCç~)

(SQ/ C.

-±3

1-I

C>

C?

p

Page 24: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

.

— (A

F) —

C-’ cc cm - 15- (2

~Th a ~:--~ C?

C —3;- ~

-- h cH

Pc

Page 25: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

. S

C H - - __H ~J ct __

C 1~C?

C ~-4~- C( -- -

L —\

P ~- - ~

CT:_

-~

r

2

Jh

Page 26: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

E2:N~.

C-

SC.

Cl

CT

2:-c

fl

tC

C—.

-

S

H

C

SI

cp

C

çT~

r

C

1-

fl

C

C/Th

rf\

c.

C

C-—

9.,)

(----2

I,”

-tC

r

C-

C)

‘3

ç

E

(1.,

rc 1 (L~

~‘J2ci~C

‘2

I

Page 27: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

--

C ~- 73- .r -— (9( -\

cxl ,___- - -

-- - ~_-~-)

.-) -~

C f-~- __j

--3(.3 ~-~H F

CL r U~ -~ p cmC

F H Ct

7 -~ ) ~ y- -t - ç- ~ - -~

C -k—

Page 28: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

~1

Yt~+~. - ~ -

F~iu~cV?1 j~---~ ~4~pjA:4~.

~t&’~t~T ltt iLc~ ~ Cfl LU L*~ t~Aj~

- -

I ~—c(1 ,~~_n •~

&*ctc-1 tf&cAJ ~‘3

C.C~4tiwAk:

kt9

L~>~(-~//~—------- C—.-

In

L-- ~

~f~I CH L~L’k eC~J~5C~LC~

(J)iJJ1~-;C~

~*c~i4 Aj Cn~~

S

S

(~)L3L~’ \ct.4c’ fri Ltm e1

J€~*ci. ~/A. ç tL~.o~

IA -

L~1t ~ LTWLV; Vufl

~tCL f~tt~ ~-~i~u

~j.i e.*cctt~_i UiCL

Page 29: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

6

ICT

C’

Ct

S

C

t

.C-C

(~

.

I

y~.

(~)

C’

(p

HC.-

(1>

C

~c.cC-)

L-.)

FT

CL

C-’-

6--.-

cC

(

a

C ~

<C-

C

4—-C)

cmC-

C

ci--C

ccc

- - -- 4(C

Page 30: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

?flJikfi4~d ~\t U~i~

d~~~h c~-~-ioidj’~u~oJ,

‘O~dL—~J31 ~ be It.A ~i3~[i OJL~

U

j~I2 Uki~ / -h<~~t

1r~~ I~’

~2- ~d

~1~JITL ~~L& LV - /11.,J LAJLZJ

- t\ ••‘~~

-~

Ui L./L.C

r1FfI L-‘./

C

~. ~JL-t ~ D

r’~ ~jJ ; I,~

-j

~u~i

~2Thk~~ ~iJ(Q1~

cX(L’~1 FLLkJ~Lk.~fr ~uC Ct thn~ ~

c~ cLoJvt~L~ Lo

S

LÀ’-’r

~-. I~J~ &i~4J 1-Vi-43 ~ C~

U V

~i CC-i ~tLd

r

\i~-~’+~~d~Jt-’\~J~3J

A

L’~:

a

Page 31: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

S

r-‘:~

C~

(C

~T

~€:~

c~j~

j~t~

~>°t~c—‘~_v~

~:T~

U~C~() ~

%~~

C-~

-K~(7J~-s--

c~~s

(p

0~

(.

(3-.--

C - -

(()

C

C’)

$

C

(c~

(/7h -r

h(~t

c~)

0

‘31~

—-

C)CC

.

4,,)

C

<:1---C

H

C-.

Page 32: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

CA

(C

(~)

7;

a

ftç-f~

ci.

CC)

~:ijCCc-—c

C

c

C

C’

C-,-

C-.

c~)~

~T1r‘2(ti.

ci?(.

C—-4---

c~.

S

p

cc,

Ftc~.

CC

C -~

-1=

c12y~

~

~~y~F-

2r~

~-

c~cr~.—f~-

-

;tL

c~

.J .~ LL:•~Iht~ -.1

(Cr--.

C

2

A

‘1-CC> -

(Cj(Cy

-~

C?

(ft

-Q

C)

c

.4-’

Page 33: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

.

H ~ ~ 4 ~c L~~ II-~-~ Vft~~~LLA c~-~i~e~)C’uJ~b ~

L~tL) ~tc ~Lr~U/ WJ9~QAtUrW

)~iCçsIV VQ iTh’~, ~ ~j4A ltACL t~j~c

-~ ~ t~-~o~L’~4 LU J

.~_ fl:~7~ç~:~ ~ ~-fl. ~cvt&vH-c” -.

t~ ~>~i Tt&2 Ck~G~tmfl’7U~T1c~Q

Cc-~+O~tc ykL iUi-J~ E-! 1L~ y~cL-thi jirt&.~c2-’~-~

~ ~ ~ t\~)

t~ ;t~J cc~n-k~ c~f&~~

-n~h~ ~t : -~o1~+i.-~

S - (~‘i±C-< ii-’~J~~tLj

Page 34: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

Ii I~6~ ~- -. ,-

- 54JC~-Qj~i~*L -~ tS~u~*&c~~d ~çv~W ~

- ~

~Q~22J~21tQLCWi~t~)~I~Ø~/~JJJ g~7~j~Li LiLt -_

(~]\ hlU (~JLk~~~.y~‘1iJL)Jk t’~c.-

C)~2L16Oi~t~h: 6~fOJtt1-1,bt~f

C +* to 3j~LC~Td~ ~

-v ~ L&ujt O+uYv~1

/ &2 ~~-J uJc7~2 ?JjhcItii R-~

/9 ~ 2- ñ p-n

~4JU L-ii. ct~k~+7~ L~L+

jti~AJ E~i- c~u~ ~{cc~La~c~&~[~ cerL4 c~(-tic-/ ~ A~ C~:[L~~cUdo~c~tn~Ec

4—

~ A I~

\~L-’~ ~

L~’J~

11•

I

Page 35: STMU Law, Exam Bank, Procedure 2, Flint, Fall 1989

-~

7A/ 1::

(--NT. ~&- (‘-/-

ii ~ /r

~cz-- <-CL)

H-’ ~(7)

Ft