storm analysis and design prepared for riverton city 4/13/14 cgm consultants

25
Storm Analysis and Design Prepared for Riverton City 4/13/14 CGM Consultants

Upload: brent-matthews

Post on 17-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Storm Analysis and Design

Prepared for Riverton City

4/13/14

CGM Consultants

Problem Statement

• Riverton City is a rapidly growing city in Salt Lake County.

• Many new subdivisions are projected for development in the upcoming years.

• To minimize construction costs, an

alternative storm water design has been requested by the city.

Scope

The results of this project are a preliminary analysis and design for typical subdivisions in Riverton City

Royal Farms is a representative subdivision found in Riverton City, and was used for the analysis in this project.

Royal Farms Subdivision

Royal Farms Subdivision is a 29.8 acre subdivision located East of Bangerter Highway.

Pre-Development Runoff

Time of Concentration: 10 minutesRunoff Volume: 5,500 ft3

Post-Development Runoff

Time of Concentration: 18 minutesRunoff Volume: 23,280 ft3

• Pre- and post-development runoff volumes from the 10 year

storm were analyzed using Watershed Modeling Systems (WMS).

• According to NOAA, The 10 year storm precipitation was estimated to be 1.24 inches of rainfall.

• From WMS, the pre-development runoff volume was found to be about 5,500 cubic feet.

• The post-development runoff volume was found to be 23,280 cubic feet.

• The low impact design (LID) for the representative subdivision must hold the difference of these volumes, or 17,780 cubic feet.

Runoff Comparison

Runoff Comparison

0 10 min

18 min

1 hr 2 hr 23 hr 24 hr 24 hr 10

min

24 hr 18

min

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Pre-Development Post Development

Ru

no

ff [

cfs]

Pre-Development Runoff: 23,280 ft3

Post-Development Runoff: 5,500 ft3

Difference: 17,780 ft3

The DesignAutoCAD

Template

Used a file provided by Riverton City as our template

Parameters

Swale design◦Width◦Location◦Swale entry

Roadway design◦Traveled way◦Dividing side treatment

Swale

The design called for a swale with a width of 5.5 feet along the sidewalk

Swales are not to intersect with driveways

Meant for the roadway runoffHave inlets between driveways

Roadway

Between property lines are 54’29’ of designated roadway

◦2% grade on the normal crown and sidewalks12.5’ of side treatment on each side

◦Includes: Sidewalk 6ft Swales 5.5 ft Curbs 1ft

CAD Drawings

Ideal Lot

Typical driveway of 30ft width◦70% of properties have 30ft width, vs 16ft

Sidewalk adjacent to and leading to the house

Close up of Swale

Dimensions are in feet

5.50006.0000

Swale

Development

Swales added to every roadside

Before and After

Before and After

Cost Benefit Analysis

Cost Benefit Analysis

Simulated Development AgreementStorm Drain and Irrigation Cost Savings of 17% Non-Conservative

Limitations and Assumptions

Arbitrary Runoff Coefficient ◦Pre- versus Post- Land Use Criteria

1.8% Grade Sloping EastwardRational Method Verified

◦Approximated Using NRCS Curve Method Hydraulic Radius

◦0.375 ft for 18” pipe Cost-Benefit Analysis Errors

Evaluating Product Quality & Deliverables

Property/Easement IssuesHOA RegulationsPublic Nuisance Sand Filters

CGM Consultants

4.3.1 Graduate Student Advisor Adam Eccles, 713.838.5051, [email protected] 4.3.2 Faculty Supervisor Dr. Gus Williams, 801.208.3137, [email protected] 4.3.3 Project Manager Mason Adamson, 509.551.1565,

[email protected] 4.3.4 Design Team Leader Carter Livingston, 760.458.6449,

[email protected] 4.3.5 Engineer 1 Greg Sanchez, 609.865.5282, [email protected]