strategic plan status update goal one...9/9/2016 1 strategic plan status update goal one september...

9/9/2016

1

Strategic Plan Status Update Goal One

September 12, 2016

2

Goal 1: Growth & Excellence

York County students will consistently demonstrate growth and excellence in the skills and knowledge needed to be productive citizens.

9/9/2016

2

3


OBJECTIVES:

• State & Federal Targets

• Third Grading Reading

• Advanced Studies Diploma

• Advanced Placement Exam Results

4


OBJ: State & Federal Targets

• The division and each school will meet or exceed state and federal targets for all students and subgroups including closing achievement gaps in Math, English and the Federal Graduation Indicator.

Accreditation Benchmarks:

English 75% History 70%

Math 70% Science 70%

Annual Measurable Obj. (AMOs)

All Students

Gap Group 1

Gap Group 2

Gap Group 3

Students with Disabilities

Limited English Proficient

Econ. Disadvantaged

Asian

White

9/9/2016

3

5

Accreditation Status for 2016-2017

6

FY17 Summary of Federal AMO Status7/26/2016

School Federal AMO Status Target(s) Missed

Division Not Applicable English (SWD)

Bethel Manor Elementary Not Applicable None

Coventry Elementary Not Applicable Math (SWD)

Dare Elementary Not Applicable None

Grafton Bethel Elementary Not Applicable None

Magruder Elementary Not Applicable English (GG1, GG2, SWD, Econ Disadv) Math (SWD)

Mount Vernon Elementary Not Applicable None

Seaford Elementary Not Applicable None

Tabb Elementary Not Applicable None

Waller Mill Elementary Not Applicable None

Yorktown Elementary Not Applicable English (GG1, GG2, SWD, Econ Disadv) Math (SWD)

Grafton Middle Not Applicable English (GG1)

Queens Lake Middle Not Applicable English (GG1, GG2, SWD) Math (GG2, SWD)

Tabb Middle Not Applicable None

Yorktown Middle Not Applicable None

Bruton High Not Applicable Math (SWD)

Grafton High Not Applicable None

Tabb High Not Applicable None

York High Not Applicable None

York River Academy Not Applicable None

Gap Group 1 (GG1) Students with Disabilities, Limited English Proficient & Economically DisadvantagedGap Group 2 (GG2) Black StudentsGap Group 3 (GG3) Hispanic Students

9/9/2016

4

7

Division AMO Performance - Reading

YCSD met or exceeded all

federal AMOs for Reading except for

SWD40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All Students GG1 GG2 GG3 SWD ELL/LEP Econ.Disadv.

Asian White

FY14 FY15 FY16 AMO Target

8

Division AMO Performance - Math

YCSD met or exceeded all federal AMOs for

Math

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All Students GG1 GG2 GG3 SWD ELL/LEP Econ.Disadv.

Asian White

FY14 FY15 FY16 AMO Target

9/9/2016

5

9

Elementary Performance

10

FY17 SOL Accreditation Results - Elementary

All YCSD Elementary Schools2016-17

Fully Accredited


Grade 3-5 English 75% Grade 4 History 70%

Grade 3-5 Math 70% Grade 5 Science 70%

8/18/16

English Mathematics Science History/Social Sci

3,4,5 3,4,5 3,4,5 3,4,5 3,4,5 3,4,5 Gr.5 Gr. 5 Gr.5 Gr.4 Gr.4 Gr.4

14 15 16 14 15 16 14 15 16 14 15 16

BMES 77 93 90 84 91 93 79 95 99 91 98 97

CES 88 87 93 88 88 93 94 96 96 94 98 90

DES 81 90 93 84 91 94 74 85 95 97 99 97

GBES 77 91 93 80 93 93 74 87 89 88 93 93

MES 80 86 80 84 85 86 89 86 86 90 90 81

MVES 85 92 92 88 91 92 90 93 94 97 97 99

SES 81 90 94 86 92 94 87 84 91 92 89 95

TES 85 94 92 87 92 93 78 90 95 94 95 93

WMES 81 97 99 81 95 96 78 98 98 98 93 100

YES 80* 85 82 77 81 83 66 84 79 87 77 82

9/9/2016

6

11

English Performance

2015-2016 Results BMES CES DES GBES MES MVES SES TES WMES YES

AMO

Target

All Students 90.11% 92.73% 89.17% 92.12% 79.18% 91.98% 93.36% 91.69% 98.01% 81.23% 75%

Gap Group 1 (SWD, F/R, LEP) 83.47% 84.26% 79.03% 77.77% 64.61% 79.36% 82.35% 81.92% 91.66% 67.25% 72%

Gap Group 2 (Black) 82.22% 81.81% 83.33% 80.00% 65.15% 96.77% 77.77% 82.50% 92.85% 68.93% 71%

Gap Group 3 (Hispanic) 95.00% 93.75% 92.00% 88.00% 73.68% 95.83% 100.0% 90.32% 88.88% 80.00% 72%

Students with Disabilities 59.25% 66.66% 53.33% 59.18% 35.89% 73.08% 75.86% 77.77% 94.1% 64.70% 66%

LEP/ELL 85.71% 100.0% 75.00% 91.66% 66.66% 84.61% 87.5% 86.66% 66.66% 90.90% 69%

Economically Disadvantaged 89.62% 86.04% 84.44% 87.50% 65.04% 80.00% 78.94% 80.00% 88.46% 64.23% 72%

Asian 75.00% 96.55% 77.77% 95.00% 85.71% 88.46% 75.00% 100.0% 100.0% 88.88% 80%

White 91.93% 94.82% 90.71% 92.50% 84.56% 91.44% 94.35% 92.92% 99.09% 88.75% 77%

Math Performance

2015-2016 Results BMES CES DES GBES MES MVES SES TES WMES YES

AMO

Target

All Students 93.28% 92.78% 91.75% 92.48% 85.27% 91.28% 93.75% 92.28% 94.73% 82.78% 70%

Gap Group 1 (SWD, F/R, LEP) 90.08% 83.69% 83.87% 79.80% 70.76% 76.19% 85.29% 78.04% 83.78% 69.04% 68%

Gap Group 2 (Black) 91.30% 84.84% 66.66% 78.26% 69.23% 96.66% 75.00% 82.92% 86.66% 69.30% 67%

Gap Group 3 (Hispanic) 95.12% 91.17% 96.15% 80.00% 78.94% 91.66% 100.0% 90.00% 80.00% 85.00% 69%

Students with Disabilities 66.66% 63.33% 46.66% 66.66% 37.83% 69.23% 79.31% 74.28% 88.88% 57.57% 65%

LEP/ELL 85.71% 96.00% 91.66% 84.61% 69.23% 84.61% 100.0% 66.66% 66.66% 100.0% 66%

Economically Disadvantaged 95.28% 88.63% 91.11% 84.48% 74.03% 73.33% 86.84% 77.50% 77.77% 68.91% 68%

Asian 75.00% 96.55% 88.88% 90.47% 100.0% 96.15% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 82%

White 94.26% 94.25% 93.52% 94.97% 91.89% 89.83% 93.81% 93.87% 96.36% 88.62% 72%

8/1/2016

KEY:

Met AMO *Made AMO R10

Did Not Meet AMO Improved Performance +2 or more from 2015

Made AMO Using 3-Year Avg

"N" Too Small < 30

Elementary – Improved AMO Performance

12


OBJ: Third Grade Reading

• By FY17, 90 percent of all third grade students will be reading at or above grade level as measured by the Standards of Learning Grade Three Reading Research and Literature Assessment.

9/9/2016

7

13

Grade 3 Reading - Growth from FY14 to FY16

3rd Grade Reading Target (87.5%)

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

State Division BethelManor

Coventry Dare GraftonBethel

Magruder Mt. Vernon Seaford Tabb Waller Mill Yorktown

FY14 FY15 FY16

+19

14

Reading Growth - Grade 3(FY14) to Grade 5(FY16)

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

State Division BethelManor

Coventry Dare GraftonBethel

Magruder Mt. Vernon Seaford Tabb Waller Mill Yorktown

FY14Grade 3

FY15Grade 4

FY16Grade 5

+16

9/9/2016

8

15

To what do we attribute our success?

• School Improvement Plans aligned to Strategic Plan

• Grade level meetings and data walls

• PowerSchool (onTRAC)

• Tiered System of Supports

16

To what do we attribute our success?• Implementation of the K-5

Literacy Model

• Literacy Materials aligned to Standards

• Leveled Literacy Intervention

• Addition of Math Buddies

• Junior Great Books

9/9/2016

9

17

What are the next steps?

• Professional Learning Communities (PLC)

• SIP Presentations

• Independent Reading

• Summer Academy

18

What are the next steps?

• Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening (PALS) training

• Midyear PALS

• Team restructures

• Master schedule adjustments

9/9/2016

10

19

Writer’s Workshop

• Full implementation

• Instructional Trainers

• Professional Development

“If we could institute only one change to make students more college ready, it should be to increase the amount and quality of writing students are expected to produce.”

- David Conley, College Knowledge

20

Elementary Highlights

9/9/2016

11

21

Secondary Performance

22

FY17 Accreditation Results – Middle Schools

All YCSD Middle Schools 2016-17

Fully Accredited




8/18/16 English Mathematics History/Social Science Science12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 15 16

GMS 93 81 79 82 87 86 86 87 91 94 92 89 88 91 91 96 84 84 87 92

QLMS 91 75 80* 83 79 80 79 77 85 85 85 87 81 85 80 89 81 80 78 76

TMS 96 84 80 87 89 91 90 89 93 95 91 90 87 93 96 98 90 86 88 94

YMS 92 86* 75 81 82 84 79 86 89 89 88 87 84 88 91 96 79 81 82 84

* 3-Yr Trailing Average

9/9/2016

12

23

KEY:Met AMO * Made AMO Using 3-Year Avg

Made AMO R10 NA No test takers in group

Did Not Meet AMO "N" Too Small < 30 Indicates Perf. Improved 2+

GMS QLMS TMS YMSAMO

Target

86.90% 84.22% 90.04% 85.69% 75%

67.01% 69.59% 77.22% 69.41% 72%

72.64% 61.64% 85.84% 75.55% 71%

85.48% 86.79% 84.76% 87.50% 72%

53.33% 51.51% 66.66% 52.94% 66%

76.19% 81.81% 75.00% 61.53% 69%

71.87% 72.95% 81.15% 72.36% 72%

92.85% 85.71% 96.66% 80.00% 80%

88.73% 89.59% 90.99% 87.59% 77%

All Students

White

Asian

Economically Disadvantaged

ELL


Gap Group 3 (Hispanic)

Gap Group 2 (Black)

Gap Group 1 (SWD, F/R, LEP)

Reading Performance

2015-2016 Results

Middle School Reading– Improved AMO Performance

24


Made AMO R10 NA No test takers in group

Did Not Meet AMO "N" Too Small < 30 Indicates Perf. Improved 2+

Middle School Math – Improved AMO Performance

GMS QLMS TMS YMSAMO

Target

93.66% 84.23% 94.96% 88.75% 70%

83.41% 69.23% 87.19% 76.44% 68%

86.66% 63.01% 94.33% 84.61% 67%

100.0% 84.31% 93.33% 90.76% 69%

68.91% 50.00% 78.26% 60.86% 65%

95.23% 100.00% 90.47% 100.0% 66%

88.88% 71.66% 92.02% 78.28% 68%

98.79% 92.85% 98.36% 91.89% 82%

93.28% 90.22% 95.29% 90.07% 72%

Math Performance

2015-2016 Results

All Students

Gap Group 1 (SWD, F/R, LEP)

Gap Group 2 (Black)

Gap Group 3 (Hispanic)


ELL

Economically Disadvantaged

Asian

White

9/9/2016

13

25

Middle School Highlights

26

FY17 Accreditation Results – High Schools

All YCSD High Schools 2016-17

Fully Accredited




8/18/16 English Mathematics History/Social Science Science GCI12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 15 16

BHS 94 90 86 88 92 76* 66 78 78 84 79 82 82 86 81 88 82 84 86 86 87 91 95 91 96

GHS 97 95 95 95 96 84 85 82 82 90 93 92 94 93 93 97 94 93 94 93 94 97 95 95 99

THS 97 93 94 93 94 88 86 85 85 89 93 91 93 92 93 96 95 93 92 95 97 97 97 96 97

YHS 96 90 93 91 93 84* 72 84 84 91 89 83 89 88 88 94 89 89 90 90 94 97 95 95 97

YRA 100 82 86 89 96 73* 46 74 74 81 89 80 85 82 84 97 89 89 93 97 100 90 88 100 100

* 3-Yr Trailing Average

9/9/2016

14

27


Made AMO R10 ~ Made AMO Using FGI 5 Yr Rate

Did Not Meet AMO ^ Made AMO Using FGI 6 Yr Rate

NA No test takers in group

"N" Too Small < 30 Indicates Performance Improved 2+

Reading Performance

(2015-2016) BHS GHS THS YHS YRA

AMO

Target

All Students 91.48% 97.05% 94.94% 94.27% 95.83% 75%

Gap Group 1 (SWD, ELL, F/R) 85.71% 82.75% 83.01% 82.85% 85.71% 72%

Gap Group 2 (Black) 84.61% 95.65% 94.44% 74.19% NA 71%

Gap Group 3 (Hispanic) 100.0% 77.77% 100.0% 100.0% 50.00% 72%

Students with Disabilities (SWD) 50.00% 90.00% 62.50% 77.77% 83.33% 66%

ELL/LEP NA NA 100.00% 50.0% NA 69%

Econ. Disadvantaged (F/R) 91.89% 80.95% 86.48% 83.92% 66.66% 72%

Asian 100.0% 100.0% 100.00% 90.90% NA 80%

White 94.59% 98.37% 94.82% 96.68% 100.00% 77%

High School Reading – Improved AMO Performance

28






Math Performance


AMO

Target

All Students 82.89% 89.18% 88.59% 90.76% 78.12% 70%

Gap Group 1 (SWD, ELL, F/R) 68.69% 84.37% 80.31% 80.26% 88.23% 68%

Gap Group 2 (Black) 77.22% 83.09% 85.71% 83.33% 100.0% 67%

Gap Group 3 (Hispanic) 74.28% 80.55% 84.61% 94.11% NA 69%

Students with Disabilities (SWD) 60.60% 68.42% 65.95% 65.90% 83.33% 65%

ELL/LEP 57.14% 100.00% 89.47% 100.0% NA 66%

Econ. Disadvantaged (F/R) 70.52% 92.30% 85.71% 81.03% 100.0% 68%

Asian 100.0% 90.47% 95.65% 100.0% 100.0% 82%

White 88.20% 90.50% 89.71% 91.09% 75.00% 72%

High School Math – Improved AMO Performance

9/9/2016

15

29






FGI Performance


AMO

Target

All Students 84.28% 92.46% 95.27% 94.09% 100.0%

80%

Gap Group 1 (SWD, ELL, F/R) 81.48%~ 79.59%~ 82.60% 81.63% 100.0%

Gap Group 2 (Black) 83.87% 84.00% 86.48% 87.50% 100.0%

Gap Group 3 (Hispanic) 64.70% 94.44% 85.71% 88.23% 100.0%

Students with Disabilities (SWD) 40.00% 58.33% 73.91% 70.00% 100.0%

ELL/LEP 28.57% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% NA

Econ. Disadvantaged (F/R) 85.00%~ 61.11% 82.60% 83.87% 100.0%

Asian 100.0% 94.73% 100.0% 100.0% NA

White 85.89% 92.55% 96.80% 94.47% 100.0%

FGI – Federal Graduation Indicator (Advanced Studies & Standard Diplomas only)

High School FGI– Improved AMO Performance

30

To What Do We Attribute Our Growth?• PowerSchool

• Tiered Systems of Support

• Academic Lab Structures

• Effective Co-Teaching Models

9/9/2016

16

31

Next Steps

• Professional Learning Communities (PLC’s)

• Middle School Literacy Academy

• Leveled Literacy Intervention (LLI)

• Math Interventions

32


OBJ: Advanced Studies Diploma

• By FY17, the percentage of high school graduates earning an Advanced Studies Diploma out of the total number of diplomas awarded will increase 4 percentage points above the number awarded in 2012.

9/9/2016

17

33

Advanced Studies Diplomas

62% 62%

65%

67%

65% 65% 65%

56%57%

58%

65%66%

67%68%

50%

52%

54%

56%

58%

60%

62%

64%

66%

68%

70%

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

Advanced Diploma/IB

Benchmarks

34


OBJ: Advanced Placement Exams

• Using FY13 as the benchmark, the number of scores of 3 or higher on Advanced Placement Exams will increase by 5 percent annually.

9/9/2016

18

35

Percentage of AP Tests Scoring 3+ from 2013 Benchmark

2013 2014 2015 2016# Test Takers

# > 3 of Tests

Taken

# Test Takers# > 3 of Tests

Taken

Percentage

+/- from 2013


Taken

Percentage

+/- from 2014Percentage

+/- from 2013


Taken

Percentage

+/- from 2015Percentage

+/- from 2013# of Tests Taken # of Tests Taken # of Tests Taken # of Tests Taken

Division1145

14421099

1330 -8%1102

1454 9% 1%1064

1309 -10% -9%2039 1912 1964 1860

Bruton169

188170

150 -20%154

156 4% -17%178

141 -10% -25%321 279 260 270

Grafton364

525322

471 -10%289

471 0% -10%276

422 -10% -20%628 581 533 502

Tabb319

396330

424 7%365

489 15% 23%323

434 -11% 10%578 615 682 624

York292

333275

284 -15%294

338 19% 2%287

312 -8% -6%511 435 489 464

Using FY13 as the benchmark, the number of scores of 3 or higher on Advanced Placement Exams will increase by 5 percent annually.

36

AP: Reasons for Not Taking the Exam

9%

15%

20%56%

AP Exam toocostly

College choicedoes not accepttest scoreFeelunprepared fortestOther

9/9/2016

19

37

AP: Next Steps

• Instructional Audit

• Modify Survey

• Consider implementing BHS Model

• F/R Reimbursement Program

38

High School Highlights

9/9/2016

20

Strategic Plan Status Update Goal One

September 12, 2016

strategic plan status update goal one...9/9/2016 1 strategic plan status update goal one september...

Documents