strategy for o/p from thermodynamics. – motivation problem with uncertainty in mcnp kernel for...
TRANSCRIPT
Strategy for O/P from thermodynamics
–Motivation• problem with uncertainty in MCNP kernel for determination
of O/P ratio• develop another method to estimate upperbound of O/P ratio
–Outline• describe the factors that goes into the estimation• rate equation• how we can measure it for the next beam cycle
dM/dt is determined by liquefier rate
Assumption:Stainless Steel line at 70 K. worst case scenario: para hydrogen reaches equilibrium in the SS line.
Steady State
• let k be ortho to para conversion rate in OPC• let k’ be the up-conversion rate in the line,
which is just ce*dM/dt, where ce is the equilibrium concentration at 70 K.
• rate equation is just • which gives an exponential • this gives us a steady state solution (dc/dt =0)
of
• well this is all fine and dandy, but where can we get these number???
• measuring k (OPC conversion rate) is not simple, let us suppose two cases.– conversion time is short• we observe saturation (no evidence of decay), use
filling time as time constant
– conversion time is long• in this case, we will see the exponential decay after
filling, which means we can measure the time constant, this will give us , but in the limit of small k’ and small para-concentration, second terms drops out
• In the following exercise, I will estimate our old data run with the following parameters, just to play around with some numbers
• heater (H3) on liquefier refrigerator was not running during operation of H4 (which induces large circulation), normal operating condition for H3 is 30%, it is a 12.5 Watt heater. This is equivalent to 4.1e-3 mol/s. heat of vaporization for hydrogen is 0.904 kJ/mol
• we have close to 600 mol of H2, ce at 70K is 46% for ortho• big assumption here, time constant for large c at beginning
period of decay is 1 day.
• this gives a c=21.5%, unacceptable
• better assumption, line is extremely dirty (magnetic dirt everywhere, not really possible), so up conversion in line is just as the same as down conversion in OPC. Instead, we have
• c = 3.14e-6• now, we can multiply this (1-c) to equilibrium
(1-ce) to obtain new para concentration
Conclusion
• we need to still think of other up-converting mechanisms.
• if line conversion is largest, then we are done. new steady state is only 3e-6 smaller
• rate for ortho to para conversion drops out in this estimation.