structural details to increase ductility of connections
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 Structural Details to Increase Ductility of Connections
1/12
STRUCTURAL STEEL EDUCATIONALCOUNCIL
TECHNICALINFORMATION & PRODUCTSERVICE
APRIL 1995
Structural Details to IncreaseDuctility of Connections
By: Omer W. Blodgett, P.E.Senior Design Consultant
The Lincoln Electric Company
INTRODUCTION
Materials used in steel structures are increas-
ingly becoming thicker and heavier. A greater
chance of cracking during welding of beams
to columns, for example, has resulted due to
increased thickness of material. With weld
shrinkage restrained in the thickness, width,and length, triaxial stresses develop that may
inhibit the ability of steel to exhibit ductility.
This paper will attempt to explain why these
cracks may occur, and what can be done to
prevent them, by expanding on information
presented in the AISC Supplement No. 1
(LRFD) or Chapter J 9th Ed. AISC Manual.
Ostress
psi
I I I I I I
strain in/in
Figure 1
FIELD RESULTSI learned about the stress-strain curve (Figure
1) while taking "Strength of Materials" along
with laboratory work at the University of Min-
nesota. It took me a long time before I real-
ized that this applied only to simple tensile
specimens in the laboratory.
During World War II while I was working in a
shipyard, a docked, all-welded tanker, the
Schenectady, suddenly broke in two. At the
time, we had no answer as to what could have
caused such a catastrophic failure. We passed
it off as perhaps a poor grade of steel or poor
workmanship, and kept on welding our ships.
A short time later, we received a bulletin from
The Lincoln Electric Company in which it was
stated that ductility values come from simple
tensile specimens which are free to neck down.
The bulletin pointed out that if the same plate
had many transverse stiffeners welded to it,
the ability to neck down would be greatly re-
stricted, and the plate would fail with less ap-parent ductility.
DEFINING DUCTILITY
In Figure 2, Mohr's Circle of Stress has been
drawn, showing a tensile stress of 10 ksi up to
the ultimate of 70 ksi (numbered from 1 to 7).
-
8/8/2019 Structural Details to Increase Ductility of Connections
2/12
The corresponding maximum shear stress is at
the top of each ci rc le . For convenience, each
point of shear (illustrated as a solid dot) is moved
horizontally until it l ies directly above the corre-
sponding tens i le s tress (depicted as an open
dot). Notice that the se points form a straight line,represent ing a simple tensi le specimen. From
this l ine, i t is possible to read off the maximum
shear stress for a given tensi le stress. This is
the basic f igure used by Professor Gensamer,
as shown in Figure 3.
Gensam er introduced the concept of graphically
illustrating the maximum shear-stress theory of
fai lure. In Figure (4), the horizontal axis repre-
sents the tensile stress (o), and the vertical axis
represents the sh ear stress (-[). The critical ten-
sile stress would be the ultimate tensile strength,
but exceeding this value causes immediate fail-
cr it icat shear ? Zc/stress r o
7 tensil estress(ksi)
30 '
20 '
10
Figure 2 ,'
I 0
/ ia
: : t I I I II 2 3 /4 5 6 7
tensile stress (ksi)
Figure 3
40 II
--30 ., ,,,th .. I ., I
v, crlticat shear stress t ":1
, n i ..," - ; ' 1." / ,,
-
8/8/2019 Structural Details to Increase Ductility of Connections
3/12
In Figure 5a, the membe r is subjected to a ten-
sile stress (o) under the yield strength (ay). This
results in elastic strain and is recoverable when
the stress is removed. Notice also in Figure 5a
that a shear occurs which has a maximum value
of :--1/20 on a plane at 45, with the axis of theapplied tensile stress. If the applied stress (o) is
increased to a value of (0), the resulting shear
stress exceeds its critical value-tcR=l/2ov , then apermanent s lip occurs on p lanes a t 45, as
shown in Figure 5b and 5c.
This is plastic strain and, if continued, will cause
the specimen to neck down (Figure 5d). As the
c ross- sec ti ona l a rea con t inues to become
smaller , the tensi le stress f inal ly exceeds the
critical normal stress (tensile strength) and themember fails.
All of this can be seen in the stress-strain curve
of Figure 6. Region (a) below the yield strength
covers the elastic strain portion. Region (c) cov-
ers the plastic strain portion with the member
necking down. Point (d) is tensile failure. In the
stress-strain curve of Figure 6, region (a) is all
elastic strain. The resulting shear stress () is
under the critical value -OcR=l/2 ay, so no plasticstrain takes place.
In region (c) the resulting shear stress exceeds
the critical value and plastic strain takes place
with mo re and more necking down. The ductility
of the simple tensi le stress specimen occurs
because there is a shear stress component from
the particular load condition and, more impor-
tantly, it exceeds the critical value by a consid-
erable amount . Let us see if we can find out whythis test spec imen is ductile; then we can check
the ductility o f other loaded members or details.
The ducti li ty of a simple tensi le specimen oc-
curs because there are two shea r stresse (%-3)
and ('2-3) result ing from the applied tensile stress
(o3), as shown in Figure 7a and 7b. Notice thatwhen the stress (%) reaches its critical value
for failure (70 ksi in this example), the two shear
stresses have already exceeded their critical
value of 20 ksi. There are two shear stressesbecause there are two circles: circle (1-3) and
circle (2-3). The third circle, (1-2), has no ra-
dius, and hence no shear stress, s ince it is a
point.
=zer
tension
g
w 'r i'3 el
r--TT7--- , _ .%!0 ' 2 0'3
Figure 7A
-- 6aT
e 3Of4t.=20
lo! - - I ' I - -
.oi .02 .03' i I I '
.G4 .OS .Q6 .107 ,.(}6Total $tra;n E Tn/in
: ; ,I '.09 .10 .11 .t2
,G$rGt.e 1-3
Ptqstic , movement' / ' I
m4ke; Sl)g;men I I
r w e O . t = zen=
i3(l-i)
aircte 2-3
Z-3)
I . Th i sm q ve r ne n t c .i . 3) i oi r lt h edirion Of (3
PtasticmYJvement
makes sp4K:imenthinner
This movement 'a(z.alis ;n the Idirection af 0'3 I
tatar ptost; strain ]n d;rectlon of
JZ 3 ( I-3) ' [' '3 C2-3} Ifram framt-3 'rz-3
wiU tend to reduce the residual stres. ((T3)
Figure 6 Figure 7B
Steel April 1995 3
-
8/8/2019 Structural Details to Increase Ductility of Connections
4/12
Any value o f shear for 1;1.3 and 1;2-3 above thecrit ical 20 ksi wil l cause plastic strain. Notice in
Figure 7a that both circle (1-3) and circle (2-3)
cause plastic strain $3(1-3) and 3(2-3)' Therefore
(o3) wil l be: 3 = E3(1-3)+ s3(2-3).
Since E3( 1.3) ' - 3(2-3)' we then have: s3 = 2s3.3),w h ic h w il l t en d t o r ed uc e r es id ua l s tr es se s
caused by welding.
If the s pecime n is pulled to failure, o3 will reach
its critical value, o r tensile strength; s ee Figure
8. By this time, the two sh ear stresses are above
the critical value and plastic strain or movem ent
will have taken place. Notice th at the total plas-
tic strain consists of two values: C3(1.3) and 3(2-3)'The movement 3 acts in the di rection o f the
40 ;
t..-
crlticot shear \ I
!
lr'cr_, s toad tine It.''} r e p r e s e n t s I
{ O ' I II
; : .* I I I I10 20 30 40 50 60 70
normqt stress 0'3
Figure 8
I 2 3 4
normal elastic total plasticstress strain s tr ai n strain
0 3 e T Ep
10 .00033 .0003315 .00050 .00050
20 .00067 .00067
25 .00083 .00083
30 .00100 .0010035 .00117 .00117
40 .00133 .00133
45 .0015 .00236 .00086
50 .0017 .00485 .00315
55 .0018 .01200 .0102060 .0020 .03185 .02985
65 .0022 .08234 .08014
70 .0023 .20229 .20000
Table 1
stress o3 and would tend to reduce any residual
stress. This me mber should behave in a ducti le
manner. Plastic behavior takes place from 03 = *
40 ksi up to 70 ksi, and is caused by two differ-
ent plastic strains E3(1.3) and 3(2-3)'
Table 1 lists the data from a typical stress-straincurve f or structural steel. Total elastic plus plas-
tic strain is listed in Colum n 3. Th e elastic strain,
calculated from s = /E, is listed in Column 2. By
subt racting the e last ic s train f rom the corre-
sponding total rain, w e obtain the plastic strain,
shown in Column 4.
RESIDUAL STRESSES ISOLATED
Figure 9 i l lustrates that two important residual
stresses exist in the weld's termination zone. Thebutt joint in the flange has a residual stress lon-
gitudinal to the length of the flange (o3), as well
as a stress transverse to the f lange (%). Longi-
tudinal stress is tensile along the center l ine of
the f lange where the weld access hole termi-
nates. It can be compared to t ightening a steel '
weld (accesshole
roG,ew e l d
o4 _3
Figure 9
4 Steel Tips April 1995
-
8/8/2019 Structural Details to Increase Ductility of Connections
5/12
30 ''I u : critit shear sts,. . . . . . . . . -
ut t' 2 _ :
10 2O 30 &O SO 60 70 80
Figure 10
cable lengthwise in the center in tension, with
compression spread out on both s ides. The
transverse stress (Ol) is tensile in the weld zone,including a portion of the adjacent plate, going
through zero, and then compression, beyond the
adjacent plate. This transverse stress (o) is also
similar to tightening a steel cable.
RESIDUAL STRESSES APPLIED
These res idual s tresses may be applied to a
weld detail having a narrow weld access hole,
as shown in Figure 10. This hole terminates at
a point where (0) and (03) are in tension. Sincethe web a t the edge o f the weld access hole
offers some restraint against movement in thethrough thickness direction of the flange plate,
stress in the (02) direction may have an appre-
ciable value. All of the circles will be small. Nei-
the r (T2.3) nor (T.3) will probably ever reach thecritical shear stress value, and plastic strain or
ductility will not occur, as th e right hand of Fig-
ure 10 illustrates.
If the weld access hole can be made wider, asrecommended by AISC Specification, Ninth Edi-
t ion, so that i t terminates in a zone where the
transverse residual stress (0) is compressive
(see Figure 11), then a more favorable stress
condition will result in greater ductility in the (03)
direction. In this case, s hear stress (-c.3) will be
high as shown on Mohr's Circle of Stress, and
the critical shear value will be reached at a much
lower tensile stress or load value. This will pro-
duce more ductility in the (o3) direction, greatly
reducing the chance of a transverse crack in theflange at the termination o f the weld access hole.
EXAMPLE #1
Consider the unrestrained section, similar to a
simple tensile specimen, shown in Figure 12.
W hen the re is no app li ed s tr ess ( o) in the
through thickness direction or (o2) across the
width, these values are zero. This will produce
the largest of Mohr's circles, and the greatest
value of shear (;2.3) and ('-3)' In both cases,these shear stresses are equal to one half of
the applied tensile stress (o3). These two shear-
tensile l ines are drawn in the lower portion of
the figure. Although the re are two lines, which
would indicate good ductility, there is a differ-
ence between the two. One line represents neck-lng down through the thickness, and the other
represents necking down across the width. Al-
though the unit strains are the same in this case,
the strain acting across the width would result
in greater overall movement or elongation overthe length of the specimen.
'o, . .
'F 0 / . I cr;tiCOt .sh_ Str_
- --(ki) 2 f - ; ? - - - : - -- -.,--"2d'k,; -
Figure 11
Apri11995 5
-
8/8/2019 Structural Details to Increase Ductility of Connections
6/12
In the case of the restrained section shown in
Figure 13, (here L=W/4), the angle of maximum
shear stress lies along an angle of o - 76and
the resulting shear value is : -- .23 03. The two
shear values (%-3) and ('2-3) produce two shear-
tensile lines. The lower line acting across thewidth does not produce enough shear to exceed
the critical value, hence no plastic yielding. The
upper line indicating good plastic yielding, how-
ever, acts only through the thickness and the
overall movement would be less than the ex-
ample on the right. To get a better picture of this
behavior, the stress-strain curve shown in Fig-
ure 14 has been created for the two details.
' , - : : r I t - I . .
I I I I
TO
,, sa
? o
41t
$ 0
.01 . 02 . 03 . 04 .05 .OG . 07 14 . 09 JO .!1 .12 J ) . 14 .lis Jll J? J!) .2Q
unit strO)n in/in
Figure 14
EXAMPLE#2
There has been some discussion about the weld
connecting the beam flange to the column flange
as being brittle. Referring to Figure 15, the ma-
terial at point (A), whether it be weld metal or
base metal it cannot exhibit the ductility of a
J_
necking dcTw thru thickness ]
necking ocross wk neckbJ downthru tlcknesS
2
necking down across widthlrZ.3
I
al
40'
30.
10'
I
. ',.,ec' ' ;b
10 20 30 40 SO 60 70
tensite stress (ksi)
40
v
2o
10
i.
I
Hti shear stress _ ',. . . . . . . - -- - . . . . . . . . . .l
qr'cr:2O ks, ( Y . . . . . . . . . .i '
/ !
10 20 30 40 5 GO 70tensite stress (ksD
Figure 12 Figure 13
6 Steel April 1995
-
8/8/2019 Structural Details to Increase Ductility of Connections
7/12
simple tension test. Ductility can only take place
if the material can slip in shear along numerous
slip planes. Four condi tions are required for duc-
tility:
1. There must be a shear stress () componentresulting from the given load condition.
2. This shear s tress must exceed its cri tical
value by a reasonable amount. The more it
exceeds this value, the greater wil l be the
resulting ductility.
3. The plastic shear strain result ing from this
shear stress must act in the direction which
wil l rel ieve the particular stress which can
cause cracking.
4. There m ust be sufficient unrestrained lengthof the me mber to permit "necking down."
If conditions (1) and (2) are not met, there will
be no ductility and no yield point. The stress will
simply build up t o the ultimate tensile strength
with little or no plastic energy absorbed. We call
this condition a brittle failure.
Figure 15 shows two regions in question:
Figure 15
I
Point (A) at the weld joining th e bea m flange to
the f ace of the column flange. Here there is re-
straint against strain (movement) across the
width of the beam flange () as well as through
the thickness o f the beam flange (s2)-
Point (B) is along the length of the beam flange
away from the connecting weld. There is no re-
straint across the width of the flange or through
its thickness.
Figure 16 shows the three equations for strain
given in most strength of material texts, shown
O2
(1 O3
1
3 = "E (O3-.[%-[[,[(1)
12= (-%+%-o)
1
s,= - (-%-%+o)
or it can be shown that
E [E3+2+(1-),]
o= (l+tz) (1-21z)
E [3+(1-!Z)2+[Lt]02= (1+) (1-2)
E [(1-tZ)3+2+p.]
03= (1+[) (1-21Z)
Figure 16
steel Tips April 1995 7
-
8/8/2019 Structural Details to Increase Ductility of Connections
8/12
- - - r I1' IIr I... , , : , . - . ; - - , v, +
02=0
ai
,
!
!
!
L.
-
ol=O
o3=30ksi
3=+.001
.'
E [tz%+ze2+(1-)e l]
%= (1 +lz) (1-2tz)
30000
o, - (1+.3) (1-.6) [.3(+.001 ) +.3(-.O003)+.7(-.O003)]=Zero
in the flange. By using Poisson's ratio of iz=0.3
for steel the fol lowing strains are found for a
s im p le t en si le s pe ci me n w he n s tr es se d t o
o3=30ksi.
3 = +.001
s2 =-.0003
s =-.00 03
Using th ese strains in the three formulas for re-
sisting stresses w e find:
o = Zero
02 = Zero
o3 = 30 ksi
o2=% =Zero
E [(1-p,)3+$S:+!,te,]
3= (1 +It) (1-21Z)
30000
3:- (1.3) (1-.6)[.7(.001)+.3(-.0003)+.3(-.0003)]=30.0 ksi
ac1.3=35
:
Figure 17
0.=70
in upper box. For our use, these have been con-
verted into corresponding equations for stress,
shown in lower box.
Figure 17 is an element of the beam flange from
F ig ur e 15 p oi nt (B). There is no re stra in t
(%+o2=0) against the 30 ksi longitudinal stress
This is p lo tted as Mohr's ci rc le of s tress in a
dotted circle. The larger solid line circle is for a
stress of 70ksi or ultimate tensile stress. The
resulting maximum shear stresses (%-3) and
(-c2.3) are the radii of the se two circles or 35 ksi.The ratio of shear to tensile stress is 0.5. Figure
18 plots this as line (B). No tice at a yield point of
55 ksi, the cri tical shear value is 1/2 of this or
27.5 ks i. W hen thi s c ri tical shea r s tr ess is
reached, plastic straining or movement takesplace and ductile behavior will result up to the
ultimate tensile strength, here 70 ksi. Figure 19
shows a predicated stress-strain curve indicat-
ing ample ductility.
Figure 20 shows an element from Point (A) (Fig-
ure 15) at t he junction o f the beam and column
flange. Wh ether w e consider weld metal or the
material in the column or beam makes little dif-
ference because this region is highly restrained.
Suppose we assume:e3 = +.001 (as before)
2 = Zero '. (but now highly restrained
E1 = Zero J with little strain)
From the given equations, we find the followingstresses:
8 Steel Tips April 1995
-
8/8/2019 Structural Details to Increase Ductility of Connections
9/12
30 27.5
. . . h e
m 20fJ
tll
ID
I 0
critical shear stress 'c=1/2 o b o y.Y't.J,
";''', iv , i ,10 20 30 40 50 55 60 70
Figure 18
% = 17.31 ksi ) Increase to ( = 30.0 ksi
(72 : 17.31 ksi ult imate tensile I, = 30.0 ksi
(73 = 40.38 ksi strength = 70.0 ksi
The lower portion o f the sheet is a plot of Mohr's
circle of stress. T he maximum stresses are:
-c. 3 = 1:2.3 = 20 ksi
The ratio of shear to tensile stress is 0.286. In
Figure 18, this condition is plotted as line (A).
Notice it never exceeds the value of the critical
shear stress (27.5 ksi); therefore, there will beno plastic strain or movement, and it will behave
as a brittle material. Figure 19 shows a predi-
cated stress-strain curve going upward as a
straight l ine (elastic) until the ultimate tensile
stress is reached in a brit tle manner with no
energy absorbed plastically.
Would it help if the strength and ductility of the
weld metal or base metal were changed? See
Figure 21. The top figure is for lower strength,
more ductile steel, tensile strength of 60 ksi and
a yield strength of 40 ksi. The lower figure is for
a higher strength, lower ductile steel, tensile
strength of 70 ksi and a yield strength of 55 ksi.
Notice in the case of no restraint (B) that the
lower strength material will result in more ductil-
i ty. However, in the real wor ld where there is
80
70
60
50(/3
40(/3
30
20
10
.05 .1 ,15strain in/in
Figure 19
.2 .25 .3 .35
Steel Tips April 1995 9
-
8/8/2019 Structural Details to Increase Ductility of Connections
10/12
t
v
restraint (A), the lower strength material does
not provide any help against cracking. Neither
material will provide any ductility. It might be ar-gued that the higher strength material (lower fig-
ure) would be stronger. It still will perform in abrittle manner if over stressed.
Assuming w e have good workmanship with no
defects or stress raisers, the real success of this
connection will depend upon getting the adja-
( 7 1 =
0' 2
l!ii
ii ilI
(J1
E [g3+g2+(1-L),](1+) (1-2)
- 03i
,,' E3=+.001
30,000
1- (1+.3)(1-.6)
o2=0=17.31 ksi
O 3 =
30,000
3= (1.3)(1-.6)
[.3(+.001)+Zero+Zero]=17.31 ksi or 30.00 ksi
E [(1-ILL)E3+ -
(1+) (1-2)
- - [(1-.3)(.001)+Zero+Zero]= 40.38 ksi or 70.00 ksi
1 1.3=20
/ , / " - ' " O 3 = 7 0
Figure 20
30
20
(/)(/)
' 10
ID
Steel ITS=60 ksi IYP=40 ksi I.
= i ,10 20 30 40 50 60 70
tensile stress (o) ksi
SteelTS=70 ksi
YP=55 ksi
30 .' 27.5.
20
O'J
ID
U'J
1;=1/2 o=27.5 ksi
' , , , i !
10 20 30 40 50 55 60 70
tensile stress (o) ksi
Figure 21
cent beam to plastically deflect before this criti-
cal section cracks.
C O N C L U S I O N
The way in which a designer selects structural
details under particular load conditions greatlyinf luences whether the condi tion prov ides
enough shear stress component so that the criti-
cal shear value may be exceeded first, produc-
ing sufficient plastic movement before the criti-
cal normal stress value is exceeded. This willresul t in a duc ti le detail and min imize the'
chances of cracking.
10 Steel Tips April 1995
-
8/8/2019 Structural Details to Increase Ductility of Connections
11/12
I
REFERENCES
AISC Supplement No. 2, January 1, 1989. Tothe Specification for the Design, Fabrication &Erection of Structural Steel for Buildings.
Bjorhovde, Brozzetti, Alpsten and Tall. "ResidualStresses in Thick Welded Plates," AWS Weld-ing Journal, August 1972.
Blodgett, Omer W. Weight of Weld Metal, TheJames F. Lincoln Arc Welding Foundation, Bul-letin D417, April 1978.
Estuar and Tall. "Experimental Investigation ofWelded Built-Up Columns," AWS Welding Jour-nal, April 1963.
Gayles and Willis. "Factors Affecting ResidualStresses in Welds," AWS Welding Journal, Au-gust 1940.
Gensamer, Maxwell. "Strength of Metals UnderCombined Stresses," American Society of Met-als, 1941.
Parker, Earl R., Brittle Behavior of EngineeringStructures, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1957.
Shanley, F.R., "Plastic Strain--Combined Load-ing,'' Strength of Materials, McGraw-Hill BookCo., 1957; Chapter 11.
Steel Tips Apri l 1995 11
-
8/8/2019 Structural Details to Increase Ductility of Connections
12/12
STRUCTURALSTEEL EDUCATIONALCOUNCIL
470 Fernwood DriveMoraga, CA 94556
(510) 631-9570
QSPONSORS
Adams & Smith
Allied Steel Co., Inc.
Bannister Steel, Inc.
Baresel Corp.
Bethlehem Steel Corporation
C.A. Buchen Corporation
Butler Manufacturing Co.
G.M. Iron Works Co.
The Herrick Corporation
Hoertig Iron Works
Hogan Mfg., Inc.
Junior Steel Co.
Lee & Daniel
McLean Steel, Inc.
Martin Iron Works, Inc.
MidWest Steel Erection
Nelson Stud Welding Co.
Oregon Steel Mills
PDM Strocal, Inc.
Reno Iron Works'
H.H. Robertson Co.
Southland Iron Works
Stockton Steel
Verco Manufacturing, Inc.
Vulcraft Sales Corp.
The lcai strUctural Steel industry (aboVe spOnsors)StUdS ready to aSSist YOu in determining the most
economical solution for your products. Our assistance can range from budget prices and estimated tonnageto cost comparisons; fabrication details and delivery ScheduleS.
Funding for this publication provided by the California Iron Workers Administrative Trust.
12 Steel Tips April 1995