7/30/2019 Student1234

1/1

1 Name of Researcher 10 Experimental DesignHelen Thompson P 1 2 2 1

Q 1 2 1 2

2 Ob ective R 1 1 2 2To achieve high spinning time 2 A B C D 1 2 3 4 TPM NPM

1 60 1.2 10 10 2.22 2.48 2.57 2.38 2.41 7.603 Problem Statement 2 60 1.7 14 12 1.39 1.74 2.38 2.19 1.93 5.04

The helicopter spins too fast. 3 60 2.2 18 14 2.44 2.12 1.77 1.96 2.07 6.09

4 70 1.2 14 14 3.02 3.31 2.70 2.73 2.94 9.25

5 70 1.7 18 10 2.19 2.12 2.09 2.06 2.12 6.50

6 70 2.2 10 12 3.18 2.54 2.60 2.22 2.64 8.13

7 80 1.2 18 12 1.58 1.61 1.80 1.51 1.63 4.14

8 80 1.7 10 14 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.55 1.66 4.36

9 80 2.2 14 10 1.61 1.80 1.80 1.32 1.63 4.01

4 Quality Characteristic

Name Time of flightUnit sType

5 Current Level of Problem

Observat Current 111 2.37 Res onse Table2 2.31 TPM A B C D NPM A B

3 2.28 Level 1 2.14 2.33 2.24 2.05 Level 1 6.24 7.004 2.54 Level 2 2.56 1.90 2.17 2.06 Level 2 7.96 5.305 2.34 Level 3 1.64 2.11 1.94 2.23 Level 3 4.17 6.086 2.38 Range 0.92 0.43 0.30 0.17 Range 3.79 1.707 2.06 SSQ 5.13 1.08 0.59 0.22 SSQ 21.6 4.38 2.38 Rank 1 2 3 4 Rank 1 29 2.47 12 Opt 2 1 1 3 Opt 2 1

10 2.25

Anal sis of Variance

6 Quality Loss Function Source Pool SSQ DOF VAR Ftest SSq Rho Source Pool SSQA 0 5.13 2 2.56 35.34 4.98 55.97 A 0 22

Loss 10.00 $ Loss B 0 1.08 2 0.54 7.47 0.94 10.55 B 0 4

Target 3.50 s #### C 0 0.59 2 0.29 4.05 0.44 4.96 C 0 2Spec/Tol 3.00 s #### D 1 0.22 2 0.11 D 1 1

k 90.00 $ / s2 #### Error 1 1.88 27 0.07Variabilit NA s2 #### Pooled 2.10 29 0.07 1.00 2.54 28.52 Pooled 1Bias NA s2 #### St 8.90 35 0.25 8.90 100.0 St 29Combine 16.62 s2 #### SM 160.8 1 SM 337Total 16.62 $ / Piece #### ST 169.7 36 ST 366

7 Cause-Effect Diagram Engineering Diagram Pool 3 Factors are included in model. Pool 3 FactorsCritical F ratio 3.27 F at 0.05 and 29 deg of frdm Crit ical F rat io 4.46 FFactor 18 0.11 Conf. Int. for Factor Mean Factor 4.5 0.70 CMean 7 0.18 Conf. Int. for Expt. Mean Mean 6 0.61 CPre Mea 5 0.28 Conf. Int . for Predicted Mean Pre Me 5 0.90 C

Factors / Levels TPM Factors / Levels NPM

13

A1 2.14 2.02 2.25 A1 6.24 5.54A2 2.56 2.45 2.68 A2 7.96 7.26A3 1.64 1.46 1.82 A3 4.17 3.57

B1 2.33 2.21 2.44 B1 7.00 6.308 P-Diagram B2 1.90 1.79 2.02 B2 5.30 4.60

B3 2.11 1.93 2.30 B3 6.08 5.47

C1 2.24 2.12 2.35 C1 6.69 6.00C2 2.17 2.05 2.28 C2 6.10 5.40C3 1.94 1.75 2.12 C3 5.58 4.97

D1 2.05 1.94 2.17 D1 6.04 5.34D2 2.06 1.95 2.18 D2 5.77 5.07D3 2.23 2.04 2.41 D3 6.57 5.96

Purple Text: Key in by User

9 Factors for study Blue Text: Calculated by softwareControl Descript ion Level Level Level Units Noise Description Level 1Level Units Note: This rubric is intended to show basic Robust Design and not advanced usage.

A 60 70 80 gsm P Jack Jill -B 1.2 1.7 2.2 cm Q Casio Sharp -C 10 14 18 cm R Draug Still -D 10 12 14 cm

Body length

Timing persoStopwatchLocation

Wing length

Larger the Better

See the full version at http://www.ict-

Belmah Strategies Rubric for Conducting De

Paper typeBody width

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.002.50

3.00

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Current

Observation

Current Level of Problem

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

1 2 3 4

Response

Noise Factor Conditions

Outlier Check

Trial 1

Trial 2

Trial 3

Trial 4

Trial 5

Trial 6

Trial 7

Trial 8

0

10

20

30

40

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

Cost($)

Specification Value (s)

Larger the Better

A dynamic FREE versionof this rubric by

Belmah Strategiescan be downloaded athttp://www.ict-m.com

B Body width

D Shoulder height

A Paper

F Wing length

E Wing width

C Body length

G Wing Design

DRZX ,,;,MfY

ControlFactors (Z)

A Paper Type

B BodyWidth

C BodyLength

D WingLength

E Shoulder Height

F WingWidth

G Clip

Signal Factor (M)

S Paper Type

Noise Factors (X)

P Paper Type

Q Body Width

R Body Length

Response(Y)

Time of Flight (s)

Forces on the gyrocopter

Air resistance

Lift

Weight

Linear motion Rotational motion Flight stability

Torque from wings

Air resistance

Moment of inertia

Center of gravity

Restoring

torque

Time of Flight

Man Machine

Material Method

Paper

Reflex time Body Length

Body Width Wing Width

Wing Length

Shoulder Height

Release Method

Holding

Draft

Reflex time

Stopwatch

Paper Clip

Taper

Cause Effect Diagram

Wing Design

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

1 2 3 4

Response

Trial Facto

Ou