students’ choices of specialty and practice location
TRANSCRIPT
Global Health Programs: Medical
Students’ Choices of Specialty
and
Practice Location
John Ongito, PhD, Program Analyst
Gillian Ice, PhD, Professor, Social Medicine; Director, Global Health Social Medicine
Debra McBride, MA, Coordinator, Global Health Programs
OU-HCOM
Objectives
To investigate the relationship between the status of medical students’ participation in global health programs and their decision to:
pursue or not pursue primary care as a career
settle or not settle in medically underserved populations
settle or not settle in Health Professional Shortage Areas
(HPSAs)
settle or not settle within community < 100K people for their
medical practice.
Organization of this Presentation
Review of Terminology
Designation of MUA/HPSA
Definition of Global Health (GH).
The role of GH in medical Education.
Some of the GH rotation programs offered at OU-HCOM
Analyses of data used in this study.
MUA Designation requirements
Designation of Medically Underserved Areas (MUAs)
Index of Medical Underservice (IMU)
Scale: 0 to 100
0 </= 62.0 100
Physicians
Primary medical care
physicians per 1,000
population
Completely
underservedMUA
Best served
or least
underserved
Mortality Infant mortality rate
Poverty
Percentage of the
population with incomes
below the poverty level
Senior
Population
percentage of the
population age 65 or over
HPSA Designation requirementsHealth Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs)
1. Primary Care (Physicians)Geographic Areas Population Groups
(persons in the population
group)
Population/FTE
physician
>/= 3,500:1 >/= 3,000:1
Facilities Federal/State Correctional Institutions’ ratio of
the number of internees/year to the number of
FTE primary care physicians serving the institution
must be at least 1,000:1
HPSA Designation requirementsHealth Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs)
2. DentistsGeographic Areas Population Groups (persons in the
population group)
Population/
FTE Dentists
>/= 5,000:1 >/= 4,000:1
Facilities Federal or State Correctional facilities must:
Have a ratio of the number of internees per year to the number of FTE dentists serving the institution of at least 1,500:1
HPSA Designation requirementsHealth Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs)
3. Mental Health
Geographic Areas Population Groups
(persons in the population group)
Population to FTE
core mental health
professionals
>/= 6,000:1 >/= 4,500:1
Population to FTE
psychiatrist
>/= 20,000:1 >/= 15,000:1
Facilities: State and county mental health hospitals must:
Have an average daily in patient amount of at least 100;
Federal or State Correctional facilities must:
Have a ratio of the number of internees per year to the
number of FTE psychiatrists serving the institution of at
least 2,000:1
Review of Terminology
Global health:
Could be described as a term referring to as “an area for
study, research, and practice that places a priority on
improving health and achieving equity in health for all
people worldwide.
Global health emphasizes transnational health issues,
determinants, and solutions; involves many disciplines
within and beyond the health sciences and promotes
interdisciplinary collaboration; and is a synthesis of
population-based prevention with individual-level clinical
care” (Koplan, et al., 2009).
Global health Programs in
medical education
Develop greater ability to recognize disease presentations
Develop ability to conduct more comprehensive physical
exam skills with less reliance on expensive technologies
Increase in opportunities for development of cross cultural
competence and broader understanding of determinant of
health and diseases.
Promotes interdisciplinary collaboration in healthcare.
The Tropical Disease Research Program: Healthy Living Initiative
ComponentA visit to a community were a case of Chagas was reported.
The Tropical Disease Research Program has several field and laboratory-based components.
The Tropical Disease Research Program: Biomedical
ResearchA student engaged in entomological survey.
The Botswana Healthcare Program
Student at the Botswana-Baylor Center of Excellence to learn about health and healthcare in Botswana
Rotations per Country (1999-2015)
Country Rotations % of All Rotations
El Salvador 80 22Ecuador 73 20Kenya 66 18Scotland 25 6.9Dominican Republic 19 5.2
8073
66
2519
157 7 6 5
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
Rotations per Country(1999 - 2015)
Program RotationsYears
OfferedParticipants
CEDEINFA 71 5 80
Independent Rotation 60 11 82
TDI Research 35 11 38
SHARE Kenya 27 7 33
Kenya Grandparents Study 21 6 33
Edinburgh Geriatrics Tutorial 16 11 24
Village Mountain Mission 14 4 19
Botswana Healthcare 10 2 11
Primary Care Clinical Elective 7 1 7
TDI Research and Workshop 6 1 6
TDI Biology Workshop 5 3 5
Chinese Medicine 3 1 3
Rotations per Program (1999-2015)
Country ProgramEl Salvador CEDEINFA
China Chinese Medicine
Ecuador Ecuador Clinical
Scotland Edinburgh Geriatrics Tutorial
Kenya Kenya Grandparents Study
Kenya SHARE Kenya
Honduras Surgery Brigade
Ecuador TDI Biology Workshop
Ecuador TDI Research
Ecuador TDI Research and Workshop
Dominican Republic Village Mountain Mission
Program by Name and Country
Country Australia Jamaica
Belize Mexico
Botswana New Zealand
Bulgaria Norway
Canada Palestine
Chile Panama
China Philippines
Ecuador Poland
England Scotland
Ethiopia Senegal
Ghana Slovenia
Greece Swaziland
Guatemala Uganda
Honduras Zimbabwe
India
Country: Independent Rotation
There was a statistical significant difference between the specialty choice
of GH participants and non-participants (Chi-square(1)= 4.36, p = .037).
GH Program
Participation
Non-Primary
Care SpecialtyPrimary Care Total Count
No 443 (46.2%) 515 (53.8%) 958
Yes 70 (38.2%) 126 (61.8%) 204
Total 521 (44.8%) 641 (55.2) 1162
53.8%61.8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Yes
Primary Care Specialty
Non-GH
GH
Program Participation and Practice
Specialty
GH Program
ParticipationNon-HPSA HPSA Total Count
No 809 (86.6%) 125 (13.4%) 934
Yes 159 (84.1%) 30 (15.9%) 189
Total 968 (86.2%) 155 (13.8%) 1123
There was no statistically significant difference between practice in a
MUA for GH program participants and non-participants.
13.4%
15.9%
0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
18%
HPSA
Program Participation and Practice in HPSA
Non-GH
GH
Program Participation and Practice
in HPSA
GH Program
ParticipationNon-MUA MUA Total Count
No 581 (62.2%) 353 (37.8%) 934
Yes 96 (50.8%) 93 (49.2%) 189
Total 677 (86.2%) 446 (13.8%) 1123
There was a statistically and substantively significant difference between practice in a MUA for GH program participants and non-participants (Chi-square (1)= 8.55, p= .003).
37.8%
49.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
MUA
Program Participation and Practice in MUA
Non-GH
GH
Program Participation and Practice
in MUA
GH Program
Participation
Non-HPSA/
MUAHPSA/MUA Total Count
No 548 (58.7%) 386 (41.3%) 934
Yes 85 (45.0%) 104 (55%) 189
Total 633 (56.4%) 490 (43.6%) 1123
There was a statistically and substantively significant difference between practice
in either a HPSA or MUA for GH program participants and non-participants.
41.3%
55.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
HPSA/MUA
Program Participation and Practice in Either HPSA or MUA
Non-GH
GH
Program Participation and Practice in
Either HPSA or MUA
Questions?
Are students learning any specific
competencies?
How do you measure the outcomes of global
health programs in you schools?
International
Rotations CompletedStudents
1 313
2 54
3 7
4 12
5 2
6 2
Total 390
313
54
7 12 2 20
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1 2 3 4 5 6Number of Rotations Completed
Student Completion of 1 or More Rotations
Number of Rotations for Each Individual
Chi-Square Test
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.359a 1 .037
Continuity Correction 4.042 1 .044
Likelihood Ratio 4.403 1 .036
N of valid cases 1162
Practice Choice- GH vs. nonGH Stats
Chi-Square Test
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.692 1 .003
Continuity Correction 8.191 1 .004
Likelihood Ratio 9.171 1 .002
N of valid cases 1098
Practice by Community Size- GH vs.
nonGH Stats
Chi-Square Test
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .819a 1 .365
Continuity Correction .623 1 .430
Likelihood Ratio .794 1 .373
N of valid cases 1123
Practice in HPSA- GH vs. nonGH Stats
Chi-Square Test
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.550 1 .003
Continuity Correction 8.080 1 .004
Likelihood Ratio 8.414 1 .004
N of valid cases 1123
Practice in MUA- GH vs. nonGH Stats
Chi-Square Test
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2 sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 11.994a 1 .001
Continuity Correction 11.443 1 .001
Likelihood Ratio 11.896 1 .001
N of valid cases 1123
Practice in Either HPSA or MUA- GH vs.
non-GH Stats
Sources:o Institute of Medicine (U.S.), Board on International Health. America’s
Vital Interest in Global Health: Protecting Our People, Enhancing Our Economy, and Advancing Our International Interests. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997.
o Health Resources and Services Administration. Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs). Designation Criteria and Guidelines. Retrieved from http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/shortage/hpsas/
o Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, et al. Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet 2009;373: 1993 - 5.
o Ohio University Global Health Initiative. Global Health Experiences. https://www.ohio.edu/globalhealth/programs.cfm