study: comparison of protection against ocular

18
Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products Appendix: Supplementary observations & photographs Shmuel Shoham 1, 2, Carlos Acuna-Villaorduna 2 , Margaret Cotton 1 , Matthew Hardwick 1 Medstar Health Research Institute 1 ,Washington Hospital Center 2 Study conducted Nov-2009

Upload: others

Post on 28-Mar-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations & photographs

Shmuel Shoham1, 2, Carlos Acuna-Villaorduna2, Margaret Cotton1, Matthew Hardwick1

Medstar Health Research Institute1,Washington Hospital Center2

Study conducted Nov-2009

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 2

Test 1:

Bettershield and 3M N95 mask

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 3

Test 1:

Bettershield and 3M N95 mask

Mannequin head (BetterShield + 3M N95) sprayed with “glo-germ”type ink, simulating a patient event such as sneeze, cough or spray.

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 4

Test 1

Bettershield and 3M N95 mask

Results:

Mask and Shield removed, note the qty of ink visible.

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 5

Test 1

Bettershield and 3M N95 mask

Results (cont)

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 6

Test 1

Bettershield and 3M N95 mask

Results (cont)

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 7

Test 1

Bettershield and 3M N95 mask

Results (cont)

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 8

Test 2:

Integrated visor / surgical mask (i.e. non-N95 mask)

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 9

Test 2:

Integrated visor / surgical mask (i.e. non-N95)

Mannequin head (integrated mask/visor) sprayed with “glo-germ” type ink, simulating a patient event such as sneeze, cough or spray.

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 10

Test 2:

Integrated visor / surgical mask (i.e. non-N95)

Results

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 11

Test 2:

Integrated visor / surgical mask (i.e. non-N95)

Results (cont)

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 12

Test 2:

Integrated visor / surgical mask (i.e. non-N95)

Results (cont)

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 13

Test 2:

Integrated visor / surgical mask (i.e. non-N95)

Results (cont)

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 14

Test 3:

Kimberly Clark Safeview worn in conjunction with 3M 1870

(i.e. frequently a standard operating procedure where N95 masks are required).

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 15

Test 3:

Kimberly Clark Safeview worn in conjunction with 3M 1870

Mannequin head (Eye Shields + N95) sprayed with “glo-germ”type ink, simulating a patient event such as sneeze, cough or spray.

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 16

Test 3:

Kimberly Clark Safeview worn in conjunction with 3M 1870

Results

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 17

Test 3:

Kimberly Clark Safeview worn in conjunction with 3M 1870

Results (cont)

Study: Comparison of Protection against Ocular Contamination with Disposable Eyewear Products

Appendix: Supplementary observations and photographs 18

Test 3:

Kimberly Clark Safeview worn in conjunction with 3M 1870

Results (cont)