summary findings – accessory dwelling “pilot …...max. height: 3 stories/ 40’ 3 stories/...
TRANSCRIPT
Offices ! 222 West Hargett Street ! Post Office Box 590 ! Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
SummaryFindings–AccessoryDwelling“PilotProject”OnOctober7,2015,theRaleighCityCouncilreceivedaPetitionofCitizenrequestinginitiationofaprocesstopermitbackyardcottagesonpropertieswithintheMordecaineighborhoodarea.CityCouncilreferredtherequesttoCityAdministrationforstudy,withaprimaryconsiderationbeingthepossibilityofthecreationofnewOverlayDistrict.STUDYAREAFor the purposes of this assessment, the area under consideration is that defined by the boundaries of theMordecai Citizens Advisory Council. Roughly, the area consists of some 635 acres, bounded by theNorfolk-SouthernRailroadright-of-wayonthewestandnorth,AtlanticAvenueandBrooksideDriveontheeast,andN.BoundaryStreetandPeaceStreetonthesouth.AreaZoningTheCACareaencompassesamixof zoningdistricts,within residentialdistrictspredominating. Mostdistrictspermittingnon-residentialusesareconcentratedtothewestandnorthalongCapitalBoulevard,andbetweenPeaceandDelwaystreetsonthesouth.Small-scaleretaildevelopmentisalsolocatedonWakeForestRoadandportionsofN.BlountStreet.Onlyresidentialusesarepermittedonmostotherproperties.MostparcelseastofWakeForestRoadarezonedR-10,whilewestofWakeForestRoad,exceptforapocketofR-10zoningcenteredMarshallStreet,zoningisR-6.Thesebasezoningdesignationsnotonlydeterminesiteuse,butalsoelementsofbuiltform,asUDOBuildingTypesarelimitedbydistrict.An added consideration in the central and eastern parts of the CAC area is the presence of the MordecaiNeighborhoodConservationOverlayDistrict(NCOD)and,onthewestsideofBrooksideDrive,aportionoftheOakwoodParkNCOD.Developmentintheoverlaysissubjecttoadditionalstandardsregulatingminimumandmaximum lot size and width, maximum building height, and, related to principal dwellings, minimum frontsetback.AsummaryofNCODstandardsandamapoftheassociateddistrictsareattached(AttachmentsA&B,respectively). NCOD standards may preclude certain Building Types, which could permit more than oneresidenceonasingleparcel,fromcertainpropertieswithintheOverlayareas.
Page2of15
ACCESSORYDWELLINGS-DISCUSSIONTODATEBackgroundThePublicReviewDraftoftheUnifiedDevelopmentOrdinance(UDO)containedprovisionswhichwouldhaveallowed“BackyardCottage”asapermittedBuildingTypeinallResidentialzoningdistrictsandmostMixedUsedistricts.Inadditiontodescriptiveinformation,thesectionincludedstandardsregardingLotSpecifications(e.g.,min. lotsize,max. livingareasize),BuildingSetbacks,Height,andVehicularAccess. Acopyof thesection,asoriginallyproposed,isattached(AttachmentC).The Public Review Draft of the UDOwas released in April, 2011. In the followingmonths, public commentincluded concerns regarding potential negative impacts on existing neighborhoods, should the provisions beapproved.Thoseissuesincluded:
• Incompatibleform/design:− Quality/ compatibility of development -- Lack of guarantee as to cottage building materials and
qualityofconstruction.− Height -- Potential for cottages effectively to bemore than 2 stories on sloped lots, and rooftop
patios/parapetstobepartofflat-roofedcottagesresultinginthebuildingineffectbeingmorethan25feettall.
− Privacy impacts -- Questions of placement/ proximity to next-door backyards and dwellings,affecting neighbors’ privacy (e.g., cottage doors and 2nd-story windows facing neighboring yards;minimumdistancefromsame-lothouseprovided,butnotfromhousesonadjoiningproperties).
− Transitionyards/fences–lackofprovisionsrequiringthemindenseresidentialareas.− Parking -- On-site parking requirements could potentially increase curb cuts (impacting traffic
movement)whileexpandingsiteimpervioussurfaces(impactingstormwaterrunoff).• Incompatibleuse:
− Encouraging proliferation of rental units -- There is a lack of assurance that cottages would notbecomerentalunits,coupledwiththepotentialthatbothprincipaldwellingandcottagewouldbothbecome rental [due to court ruling that owner-occupancy cannot be required; see City ofWilmingtonv.Hill,189N.C.App.173,657S.E.2d670(2008).] (Ontheotherhand,NorthCarolinamunicipalitiesmayrestrictthenumberofunrelatedpersonslivingonasingleparcel.)
− Potentialforessentiallydoublingsitedensity,irrespectiveofzoningdistrictdesignation.− Potentialforincreasedlightandnoise.
The net effect of permitting cottages, many citizens felt, would be to encourage rental units over homeownership, which could destabilize neighborhoods, and decrease property values. In February, 2013, CityCouncil voted towithdraw theproposedBuilding Type from thedraftUDO; theUDOwenton to approval inSeptember,2013,withoutitsinclusion.SubsequentDiscussionCitizenproponentsofaccessorydwellings,however,havecontinuedtoexplorecircumstancesunderwhichthebuildingformmightbepermitted.Inthefallof2014,studentsandfacultyoftheNCStateUniversitySchoolofArchitecturepresented the resultsof “TheMordecaiBackyardCottageProject,”which tookadesign-orientedapproachtohowaccessorydwellingsmightphysicallyfitintotheMordecaineighborhood.Componentsoftheprojectalsoexaminedhowothercitiesincorporatedaccessorydwellingsintotheirrespectivezoningcodes(seehttps://design.ncsu.edu/ah+sc/?portfolio=the-mordecai-backyard-cottage-project.)
Page3of15
EXISTINGMULTI-DWELLINGOPTIONSTheUnifiedDevelopmentOrdinancealreadypermitsmorethanonedwellingonasinglelotorsite,viaprovisionofspecificBuildingTypeswithinspecificdistricts(Article1.4).Twodesignoptionspertaintostructuressharingthesameroof:AttachedHousepermitstwoprincipaldwellings(i.e.,duplex)onalot.ItisallowedbyrightinResidential-6(R-6)andResidential-10(R-10)districts,andmostMixedUsedistricts: R-6 R-10 MixedUseMin.LotSize: 9,000sf 6,000sf 6,000sf(DX:n/a)Max.Height: 3stories/40’ 3stories/40’ 3stories/40’Advantages:• Alreadyallowedbyrightinrespectivedistricts.LotsizestandardswithintheNCODsofthestudyarea(see
AttachmentA)wouldaccommodatethisBuildingType.• Maximumdensitylimitedperrespectivedistricts.Disadvantages:• Bydefinition,unitsmustbecontiguous.Apartmentbuilding,definedasaccommodating3ormoredwellingunitsinasinglebuilding,isnotpermittedinResidential-6(R-6)zoning,butispermittedinR-10andmostMixedUsedistricts: R-6 R-10 MixedUseMin.Lotsize: -- 15,000sf 10,000sf(DX:n/a)Max.Height: -- 3stories/45’ PerDistrictAdvantages:• Alreadyallowedbyrightinrespectivedistricts.• Maximumdensitylimitedperrespectivedistricts.Disadvantages:• Bydefinition,unitsmustbeinonebuilding.• Opportunityrestrictedbyminimumlotsizes.WithintheMordecaiNCODareas,maximumlotsizestandards
wouldeliminateApartmentasapermittedBuildingTypeintheR-10basedistrict.Athirdoptionpermitsmultiplefree-standingunitsonasharedsite:CottageCourt,whiledefinedintheUDOasan“AdditionalHousingPattern”ratherthanBuildingType,permitsuptofivedwellingsatasinglesharedlocation.CottageCourtstooareallowedbyrightinResidential-6(R-6)andResidential-10(R-10)districts,aswellasmostMixedUsedistricts. R-6 R-10 MixedUseMin.Lotsize: 40,000sf 22,000sf 18,000sfMax.Height: 25’ 25’ 25’Max.#ofDwellings 5 5 5(permin.area)Min.#ofDwellings (notspecified) (notspecified) (notspecified)
Page4of15
Advantages:• Alreadyallowedbyrightinrespectivebasezoningdistricts.• Couldpermitjusttworesidencesonasinglelot(ineffect,principaldwellingandaccessorydwelling).Disadvantages:• Opportunityrestrictedbyminimumsitesize,minimumlotsizes,andrequiredopenspace.• WithintheNCODareaswithintheMordecaiCACboundaries,minimumnetsiteareastandardswould
eliminateCottageCourtasapermittedBuildingTypeonnearlyallparcels.TestCase:MordecaiAttachedisaseriesoftablesand/ormapsindicatingthosepropertiesintheMordecaiCACareainwhicheachoftheaboveoptionsarenowpermitted.• AttachmentE–PropertiespermittingAttachedHouses• AttachmentF–PropertiespermittingApartments• AttachmentG–PropertiespermittingCottageCourtsSpecialOption–HealthCareStructuresN.C.G.S.160A-383.5,whichbecameeffectiveOctober1,2014,permitsbyrighttheinstallationof“temporaryfamilyhealthcarestructures”asaccessorydwellingsonlotswithinanyzoningdistrictinwhichsingle-familydetacheddwellingsareallowed.Thestructuresaresubjecttomultiplequalifications,amongthem,thattheybeassembledoff-site,builttothestandardsoftheStateBuildingCode,transportable,andbenomorethan300squarefeetinsize.Theyalsocannotbeplacedonapermanentfoundation,andmustberemovednomorethan60daysafterbeingvacated.Additionally,theywouldbesubjecttoalllocalordinances(includingzoningsetbacks,height,etc.),andmayalsobesubjecttorestrictionunderprivatecovenants.Aspecialusepermitwouldnotberequired.SomeNorthCarolinamunicipalitieshaveamendedtheirrespectiveCodestolistthestructuresasapermitteduse.Inthosecitieswhichhavenot,includingRaleigh,theprovisionsoftheStatestatuteautomaticallygovern.Nonetheless,undertheStatelegislation,“healthcarestructures”arenowalegally-permittedaccessorydwellingonallparcelsinthestudyarea,providedstatuteprovisionsaremet.POTENTIALALTERNATIVEOPTIONSThepreviousefforttowardpermittingbackyardresidencessoughttocreatestandardswherebyby-rightapprovaloftheform/usecouldbegrantedinnearlyallUDOdistricts.However,citizenconcernsoverthatapproachsuggestthat,foraccessorydwellingstobereconsidered,adifferentregulatorymethodisneeded.Suchapproachwouldostensiblynarrowthespecificcircumstances/criteriaunderwhichtheusewouldbepermitted.SpecialUsePermitTheUDOprovidesthatcertainusesmaybeallowedinspecifiedzoningdistricts,providedcertaindesignand/orperformancestandardsaremet.ReviewisbytheBoardofAdjustmentthroughapublichearingofquasi-judicialformat.
Page5of15
AmpleprecedentforsuchanapproachisappliedintheUDO,governingresidentialusesasdiverseasBoardinghouse,CongregateCare,andSpecialCareFacilities.Advantages:• Usecouldberestrictedtocertaindistricts.• Usecouldberequiredtomeetspecific,objectivestandards.• Processprovidesopportunityforpublicdialogue,allowingfine-tuningofagivenproposal.Disadvantages:• Wouldbepermittedinanylocationmeetingzoning/sitestandards,withoutopt-in/opt-outopportunities.• Specificapprovalcriteriarequired,addressingsitedevelopment(e.g.,setbacks,height,etc.)anduse(e.g.,
restrictingnumberofunrelatedpersonsperparcel).• Expensetopetitioners(i.e.,applicationfees,timeinreview).• Addedadministration(i.e.,processingandreviewofapplication,includingPublicHearing).OverlayDistrictOverlaydistricts,asstatedintheUDO,aim“toapplyregulationsthatachieveaspecificpurposetoatargetedarea.”Bydefinitiontheyrequiredesignationofspecifiedboundaries,throughrezoning,andwithinwhichallprovisionsofthedistrictapply.Intheeventofconflictwithbasedistrictzoning,overlayprovisionsprevail.TheUDOgroupscurrentoverlaysintofivecategories:Environmental,Corridor,CharacterProtection,Transit,andParking.Ofthose,‘CharacterProtection’mostdirectlyaddressesbuiltform—themostoutwardmanifestationof‘accessorydwelling’asasiteuse.Advantages:• Usecouldberestrictedtowithinspatially-definedareas,viaopt-inrezoning.• Usecouldberequiredtomeetspecific,objectivestandards.• Processprovidesopportunityforpublicdialogue,allowingfine-tuningofagivenproposal.• Withinrezonedarea,usecouldbeadministeredlikeanyotherformofdevelopment.Disadvantages:• Wouldbepermittedinanylocationmeetingzoning/sitestandards,withoutopt-in/opt-outopportunities.• Specificapprovalcriteriarequired,addressingsitedevelopment(setbacks,height,etc.)anduse(• Addedexpensetopropertyowners(i.e.,applicationfees,timeinreview)andadministrativerequirements
(i.e.,processingofapplicationthroughallreviewstages).EithertheSpecialUsePermitorOverlayDistrictoptionwouldrequiredevelopment,approval,andapplicationofuse-specificstandardsforuseapproval.Suchconsiderationsmightinclude:• OverlayDesignation• Density• Occupancy• Access/parking• Form/placement• Transitions
Page6of15
Asabaselinefordiscussionofthoseprovisions,staffpreparedamapstudyofpropertieswithintheMordecaiCACwhichcouldaccommodateanAccessoryDwellings,applyingthefinalsetof‘BackyardCottage’standardspreviouslypresentedtotheRaleighCityCouncil(February11,2013).Themapappearsbelow,asAttachmentH.DesignStandardsInadoptingstandardsforpermittingaccessorydwellings,othercitieshavespecifiedthatavisualdesignrelationshipbeinevidencebetweenprincipalandaccessoryresidences.Citedsimilaritiesrangefrombuildingform(e.g.,bothstructureshavingpitchedroofs)toexteriormaterials(e.g.,bothstructureshavingthesametype/colorofsiding).RecentactionbytheNorthCarolinaStateLegislature,however,limitssuchopportunity.SenateBill25/SessionLaw2015-86Zoning/Design&AestheticControlsremovedlocalauthoritytoregulatecertaindesignelementsforsingleandtwo-familydwellings.Suchfeaturesinclude:⋅ Exteriorbuildingcolor,⋅ Typeorstyleofexteriorcladdingmaterial,⋅ Styleormaterialsofroofstructuresorporches,⋅ Exteriornonstructuralarchitecturalornamentation,⋅ Locationorarchitecturalstylingofwindowsanddoors,includinggaragedoors,⋅ Numberandtypesofrooms,and⋅ Interiorlayoutofrooms.However,thelawspecificallystatesthatitisnotapplicablewithinlocalorNationalRegisterhistoricdistricts.MuchoftheMordecaiCACareawestofWakeForestRoadandsouthoftheNorfolkSouthernRailroadright-of-waycomprisestheMordecaiPlaceNationalRegisterHistoricDistrict(seeAttachmentI);withinthatarea,itcouldbepossible,then,toestablishcertaincontextualdesignstandards.InabilitytoapplysimilarstandardselsewhereintheCACarea,though,couldraiseissuesofpracticalityandequity(asitcouldleadtotwosetsofoverlaystandardsbeingadoptedinadjacentportionsofthesamegeneralarea).CONCLUSIONSAsdemonstratedbythePetitionofCitizenfromtheMordecaiarea,thereispublicinterestinpermittingaccessorydwellingsintheCity.Drawingfrompastexperience,however,thereisalsointerestinlimitingthelocationsandcircumstancesunderwhichtheusecouldbepermitted.CreationofaspecialOverlayDistrictprovidesanopportunityforbalancingtheinterestsanddesiresofthosewhoseektheusebyright,andthosewhomayholdconcernsinthatregard.
Page7of15
ATTACHMENTA
NeighborhoodConservationOverlayDesignStandardsMORDECAINEIGHBORHOODCONSERVATIONOVERLAYDISTRICT(UDOSec.5.4.3.F.8)a. ConservationDistrict1
(westofWakeForestRoadandnorthofCedarStreet,exceptforpartofthenorthsideofCourtlandDrive)
i. Minimumlotsize:7,260squarefeet.ii. Maximumlotsize:14,520squarefeet.iii. Minimumlotwidth:50feet.iv. Maximumlotwidth:100feet.v. Frontyardsetback:Minimumof35feet.vi. Maximumbuildingheight:35feet.
b. ConservationDistrict2
(eastofWakeForestRoad,southofCedarStreetandportionsofCourtlandDrive)
i. Minimumlotsize:7,260squarefeet.ii. Maximumlotsize:14,520squarefeet.iii. Minimumlotwidth:50feet.iv. Maximumlotwidth:100feet.v. Frontyardsetback:Minimumof15feet;maximumof25feet.vi. Maximumbuildingheight:35feet.
OAKWOODPARKNEIGHBORHOODCONSERVATIONOVERLAYDISTRICT(UDOSec.5.4.3.F.11)a. Minimumlotsize(residential):6,000squarefeet.b. Minimumlotwidth(residential):55feet.c. Maximumlotwidth(residential):80feet.
Page8of15
ATTACHMENTBMordecaiStudyAreaNCODs
Page9of15
ATTACHMENTCBACKYARDCOTTAGEPROVISIONS–UDOPublicReviewDraft–April,2011
Page10of15
ATTACHMENTDMordecaiCACZoningDistricts
Page11of15
ATTACHMENTEMordecaiCACAreaPropertiesPermittingAttachedHouses*ZoningDistrictsthatpermitAttachedHouses:R-6,R-10,RX-,OX-,NX-,CX-,DX-
Page12of15
ATTACHMENTFMordecaiCACAreaPropertiesPermittingApartments*ZoningDistrictsthatpermitApartments:R-10,RX-,OX-,NX-,CX-,DX-
Page13of15
ATTACHMENTGMordecaiCACAreaPropertiesPermittingCottageCourtDevelopment*ZoningDistrictspermittingCottageCourts:R-6,R-10,RX-,OX-,NX-,CX-,DX-
Page14of15
ATTACHMENTHMordecaiCACAreaPropertiesThatWouldPermitAccessoryDwellingUnits*ZoningDistrictsthatwouldpermitADUs:R-6,R-10,RX-,OX-,NX-,CX-,DX-,IX-(underfinalUDOproposal)
Page15of15
ATTACHMENTIMordecaiPlaceHistoricDistrict