summary of the rf parallel session steve virostek lawrence berkeley national lab mice collaboration...

42
Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Upload: diana-watson

Post on 17-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel

Session

Steve VirostekLawrence Berkeley National Lab

MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Page 2: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 2Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

RF Session Talks

MuCool RF Program: RF Cavity R & D

(A. Bross)

RFCC Module Design Update

(S. Virostek)

Coupling Coil Integration with the RFCC Module

(S. Virostek)

Page 3: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

MuCool RF Program:RF Cavity R & D

805 and 201 MHz Studies

ANL / FNAL / IIT / LBNLU Miss / Cockcroft

Alan Bross

MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 13, 2007

Page 4: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 4Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

MuCool Test Area

Page 5: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 5Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

MuCool Test Area

• Facility to test all components of cooling channel (not a test of ionization cooling)– At high beam power

• Designed to accommodate full Linac Beam

• 1.6 X 1013 p/pulse @15 Hz

– 2.4 X 1014 p/s

– 600 W into 35 cm LH2 absorber @ 400 MeV

– RF power from Linac (201 and 805 MHz test stands)• Waveguides pipe power to MTA

Page 6: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 6Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

MTA Hall

Page 7: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 7Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

805 MHz •Data seem to follow universal curve

– Max stable gradient degrades quickly with B field

•Remeasured– Same results– Does not condition

Gra

die

nt

in M

V/m

Peak Magnetic Field in T at the Window

Page 8: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 8Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

805 MHz Imaging

Page 9: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 9Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

805 MHz Sparking Damage Curved Be Window after

Processing in Magnet Field

Small amount of sparking damage on upstream window at 12 o’clock (least damage seen in Studies). Cavity bright & clean. Damage on copper iris is mainly from previous testing.

Page 10: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 10Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Next 805 MHz study - Buttons

Button test– Evaluate various materials and coatings– Quick change over

Field Profile

Page 11: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 11Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

First Set of Button Data – TiN Coated Cu

Page 12: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 12Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

TiN Coated Cu – After Running

Page 13: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 13Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

RF R&D – 201 MHz Cavity Design•The 201 MHz Cavity is now operating

– New x-ray background data collected (see Alan’s talk)

Page 14: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 14Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

201 MHz Cavity Status

•The flat Cu windows have been replaced w/curved Be windows

•Slower conditioning and more sparking than with the Cu. May be due to better clean room at J-Lab during initial installation.– However, MTA CR air quality was measured at class 100 or better

•So far the 201 w/Be windows has been conditioned to ~5MV/m

•No running for >3 weeks due to 201 power source problems – Note: The cavity is now out of tune (beyond the range of power source)

and must be re-tuned via the jacking screws

– Cavity frequency dropped ~400 kHz w/curved Be windows installed

– Will get help @Fermilab from LBNL to do the tuning

Page 15: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 15Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Clean Room for 201MHz Cavity

Page 16: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 16Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

201 MHz Sparking Damage on Flat Copper Window

coated with TiN over center portion

The inside of the cavity appeared bright & clean

•Very little spark damage after RF processing to 18 MV/m

•One copper splatter visible (photo)

Page 17: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 17Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Curved Be window Installation

Tyvek-wrapped Mike Dickinson and Ben Ogert installing one of the Be windows

Page 18: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 18Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Plans for the MTA

•Continue 805 MHz button tests w/bare & TiN coated buttons

•We have buttons made with the following metals– Tantalum – Tungsten – Molybdenum-zirconium alloy– Niobium– Niobium-titanium alloy– Stainless steel

•Continue conditioning 201 with Be windows (if power ever becomes available) without B field (after re-tuning).

– Then do B field scan • Can go up to few hundred gauss at present• Need new pumping system to go higher • And eventually Coupling Coil

Page 19: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 19Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Coupling Coil Layout in the MTA

Page 20: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

RFCC Module Design

Update automatic tuners

cavity suspension

cavity installation

Steve VirostekLawrence Berkeley National Lab

MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 13, 2007

Page 21: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 21Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

RF Cavity & Coupling Coil Modules in MICE

RFCC Modules

Page 22: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 22Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Updated RFCC Module 3D CAD Model

201 MHz RF cavity

Automatic tuners

Cavity suspension

Page 23: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 23Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Cavity Tuner Design Features•Six evenly spaced automatic tuners per cavity provide frequency adjustment

•Layout avoids interference with cavity ports

•Tuners touch cavity and apply loads only at the stiffener rings

•Tuners operate in “push” mode only (i.e. squeezing)

Page 24: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 24Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Four Cavity Layout in Vacuum Vessel •Tuner layout

rotated 30º @ cavity pairs

•Actuators are off cavity center plane to avoid coupling coil

•Bellows connections at vacuum vessel feedthroughs

•0 to -460 kHz tuning range (0 to -4 mm)

•1.6 MPa max. actuator pressure (50 mm)

Page 25: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 25Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Cavity Tuner Section View

Ball contact only

Dual bellowsfeedthrough

Tuner actuator(likely air)

Pivot point

Fixed (bolted)connection

Page 26: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 26Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Tuner component Details

Fixed arm

Pivoting arm

Actuator& bellowsassembly

Forces are transmitted to the stiffener ring by means of “push/pull” loads applied to the tuner lever arms by the actuator assembly

Page 27: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 27Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

•Six strut system provides kinematic cavity support

•Orthogonal strut layout is stiff and allows accurate cavity positioning

•Kinematic mounts fix cavity without over-constraint

Cavity Suspension System

Page 28: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 28Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Cavity Suspension System

1 vertical strut

2 horizontal struts

3 axial struts

Page 29: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 29Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Strut End Connection Details

One end of the struts is attached to a fixed lug welded to the ID of the vacuum vessel

The cavity end of the vertical and one of the horizontal struts are attached directly to the stiffener ringThe cavity end of the axial and one of the horizontal struts are attached to the fixed leg of a tuner

Page 30: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 30Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Four Cavity Layout in Vacuum Vessel •Dedicated struts

(6) for each cavity

•No contact between cavity pairs

•Struts axially fix the outside walls of the cavity pairs

•Tuning deflections increase cavity gap

Page 31: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 31Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Cavity Installation Sequence

•Pre-assemble cavities with Be windows and tuners (w/o actuators)

•Slide inner cavities into vacuum vessel using spacer/alignment blocks

•Shim cavity to align tuner & coupler vacuum feedthrus with tuner mounts and cavity ports

•Install struts, tuner actuators and RF couplers

•Repeat same process for outer cavities

Page 32: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Coupling Coil

Integration with the

RFCC Module

Steve VirostekLawrence Berkeley National Lab

MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 13, 2007

Page 33: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 33Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Coupling Coil Integration Topics

•New coupling coil design developed by LBNL & ICST (Harbin)

•Increased coil length (+35 mm to 285 mm) results in longer vacuum vessel

•Integration issues w/tuners and RF, vacuum & diagnostic cavity ports

•Must transmit magnetic forces from the cold mass supports to the vacuum vessel

•New 3D model developed by LBNL for integration

Page 34: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 34Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Reinforcing plates

Indented sections

Servicetower

Cryocoolers

Support cone

Cold mass supports

Coil assembly

He cooling pipes

Coupling Coil Design Configuration

Page 35: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Coupling Coil Gusset Connections

Gussets between cold mass support cones and vacuum shell transmit magnetic forces

Tuner actuators nest between gussets

Page 36: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 36Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Upper Cold Mass Support Cones

Weld

Weld

Page 37: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 37Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Connection to Support Side Plate

Support stand side plate

Weld

Tuner cutout

Interior gusset

Page 38: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 38Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Vacuum Vessel Assembly to Coil

Vacuum weld on interior

Page 39: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 39Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

RF Coupler/Coil Interface

Coupler vacuum sleeve nests in coil vacuum shell recess (3 mm gap)

Page 40: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 40Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Vacuum System/Coil Interface

Vacuum manifold

Vacuum pump

Gate valve

Page 41: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 41Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Vacuum System Integration

Inside cavity vacuum connectionOutside cavity vacuum connection

Vacuummanifold

Vacuum pump

Gate valve

Page 42: Summary of the RF Parallel Session Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting 18 June 16, 2007

Summary of the RF Parallel Session Talks from MICE CM18

Page 42Steve Virostek - Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

Vacuum Manifold/Coil Interface

Vacuum manifold end nests in coil vacuum shell recess (3 mm gap)