sustainable growth of eaton’s electrical sector optimization of the distribution network 1...

18
Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

Upload: stewart-dickerson

Post on 18-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

1

Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector

Optimization of the Distribution Network

Krannert School of Management

Purdue University

Page 2: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

2 2014 Case Competition

What Are We Covering?

StarTrek Consulting Team

Problem Statement

Recommendation

Analysis

Summary

Q&A

Purdue University

Page 3: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

3 2014 Case Competition

Dane Snyder

MBA 15Operations and

Finance

Tiepoint Consulting Team

Nick Grady

MBA 15Operations and

Finance

Brian Fish

MBA 15Finance and Operations

Ayush Goel

MBA 15Operations and

Business Strategy

Purdue University

Page 4: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

4 2014 Case Competition

Current Situation

Nick Grady

• 16 Customer Manufacturing Solution Centers• Over 10 Components Manufacturing Sites

Page 5: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

5 2014 Case Competition

Problem Statement

Nick Grady

• High inventory level

• Increased premium freight

• Questionable sustainability

Page 6: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

6 2014 Case Competition

Recommendation

Nick Grady

• Construct new warehouse in Wichita, KA

• Decreased overall inventory

• Decreased premium freight

• Strategic placement for future growth

Page 7: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

7 2014 Case Competition

Current Cost Analysis

Nick Grady

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0.11369

0.88631

Standard Trucking

Premium Freight

Shipping Modes as a Percentage of Total Orders for Selected Sites

$5,189,791

$590,049

Shipping Costs:

• Standard Trucking• Premium Freight

Page 8: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

8 2014 Case Competition

Current Cost Analysis

Nick Grady

Shipping Cost CalculationOrder Destination

Order Origin Distance Weight of Orders Average Cost/mile/lb

Total Transportation Cost

Chicago, IL Fayetteville, NC 828 mi 50,290 $.000304 $12,659

Site

Premium Freight as a Percentage of Total Orders

Chicago-SAT 7%

Chicago-SVC 12%

Dallas-SAT 3%

Dallas-SVC 17%

Los Angeles-SAT 10%

Los Angeles-SVC 9%

San francisco-SAT 24%

4 Sites Considered:

Total Annual Shipping Cost of Selected Sites: $2,385,434

Page 9: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

9 2014 Case Competition

Inventory Reduction Analysis

Dane Snyder

• Chicago-SAT• Chicago-SVC• Dallas-SAT• Dallas-SVC• Los Angeles-SAT• Los Angeles-SVC• San Francisco-SAT

50% of Total Premium

Orders

Location-product combinations to pool

Chicago-SA

T

Chicago-SV

C

Dallas-S

AT

Dallas-S

VC

Los A

ngeles-SAT

Los A

ngeles-SVC

San fr

ancisco

-SAT

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

% Premium Order of Total Order-By-Site

% Premium Order of Total Order-By-Site

Page 10: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

10 2014 Case Competition

Inventory Reduction Analysis

Dane Snyder

Chicago-SA

T

Chicago-SV

C

Dallas-S

AT

Dallas-S

VC

Los A

ngeles-SAT

Los A

ngeles-SVC

San fr

ancisco

-SAT

$0

$200,000

$400,000

$600,000

$800,000

$1,000,000

$1,200,000

$1,400,000

$1,600,000

$1,800,000

$2,000,000

Inventories of Common Stock-out CMSC's

Mean Safety Stock

Page 11: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

11 2014 Case Competition

Inventory Reduction Analysis

Dane Snyder

Total Individual Inventory Pooled Inventory$0

$200,000

$400,000

$600,000

$800,000

$1,000,000

$1,200,000

$1,400,000

$1,600,000

Safety Stocks of Individual vs. Pooled Inventory

Safety Stock

Page 12: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

12 2014 Case Competition

Cost Savings Analysis

Assumptions:• Shipping cost is average of costs provided @ $0.304/1000 miles/Lb• After risk pooling LTL can be negotiated to FTL

– Sensitivity analysis of the cost assessed by varying between 75% - 100% of the LTL cost

Ayush Goel

Page 13: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

13 2014 Case Competition

Cost Savings Analysis

Ayush Goel

Warehouse selection criteria:

• 300K Population• A positive growth rate region• Near to CMSCs with 50%

premium freight

Sensitivity Analysis:

• Three locations shipping costs were calculated

• Wichita, KS was lowest costing with highest growth rate in population

Phoenix Vegas Witchita $-

$200,000.00

$400,000.00

$600,000.00

$800,000.00

$1,000,000.00

$1,200,000.00

$1,400,000.00

$1,600,000.00

$1,800,000.00

$2,000,000.00

Shipping Cost

Shipping Cost

Page 14: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

14 2014 Case Competition

Cost Savings Analysis

Ayush Goel

Current Distribution Network

• Shipping cost are $2.4M• Frequent stock outs• High Days-On-Hand (DOH)

New Warehouse at Wichita, KS

• Shipping cost just $1.5M, half of older network

• Low Days-On-Hand (DOH), uncertainty in demand is pooled

• New growth region, opportunity for new CMSCs in central US

Current Network New Network0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

Shipping Costs

Shipping Costs

Page 15: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

15 2014 Case Competition

Financial Feasibility Analysis

Brian Fish

Page 16: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

16 2014 Case Competition

Summary

Brian Fish

Page 17: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

17 2014 Case Competition

Have Doubts!

Page 18: Sustainable Growth of EATON’s Electrical Sector Optimization of the Distribution Network 1 Krannert School of Management Purdue University

18 2014 Case Competition

Appendix

Shipping Cost Savings

Transport Cost Phoenix Vegas WitchitaReceiving from Warehouse $ 1,293,434.30 $ 1,294,952.20 $ 1,236,312.58 Receiving at Warehouse $ 538,942.33 $ 567,155.76 $ 309,437.73 Net $ 1,832,376.63 $ 1,862,107.96 $ 1,545,750.30