synaptic scaffolding protein homer1a protects against chronic inflammatory pain
TRANSCRIPT
Synaptic scaffolding protein Homer1a protects againstchronic inflammatory painAnke Tappe1, Matthias Klugmann2,5,6, Ceng Luo1,6, David Hirlinger1, Nitin Agarwal1, Justus Benrath3,Markus U Ehrengruber4,5, Matthew J During2,5 & Rohini Kuner1
Glutamatergic signaling and intracellular calcium mobilization
in the spinal cord are crucial for the development of nociceptive
plasticity, which is associated with chronic pathological pain1,2.
Long-form Homer proteins anchor glutamatergic receptors to
sources of calcium influx and release at synapses3–5, which is
antagonized by the short, activity-dependent splice variant
Homer1a. We show here that Homer1a operates in a negative
feedback loop to regulate the excitability of the pain pathway
in an activity-dependent manner. Homer1a is rapidly and
selectively upregulated in spinal cord neurons after peripheral
inflammation in an NMDA receptor–dependent manner.
Homer1a strongly attenuates calcium mobilization as well as
MAP kinase activation induced by glutamate receptors and
reduces synaptic contacts on spinal cord neurons that process
pain inputs. Preventing activity-induced upregulation of
Homer1a using shRNAs in mice in vivo exacerbates
inflammatory pain. Thus, activity-dependent uncoupling of
glutamate receptors from intracellular signaling mediators is a
novel, endogenous physiological mechanism for counteracting
sensitization at the first, crucial synapse in the pain pathway.
Furthermore, we observed that targeted gene transfer of
Homer1a to specific spinal segments in vivo reduces
inflammatory hyperalgesia. Thus, Homer1 function is
crucially involved in pain plasticity and constitutes a
promising therapeutic target for the treatment of chronic
inflammatory pain.
The long-form Homer1 proteins3, Homer1b and Homer1c (hereinreferred to collectively as Homer1b/c), assemble group I metabotropicglutamate receptors (mGluR1 and mGluR5, herein referred to collec-tively as mGluR1/5) in large macromolecular complexes with inositol1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) receptors on the endoplasmatic reticulum5,TrpC channels6, calcium channels7,8 and components of the NMDAreceptor complex9 at the cell surface. Homer1a, the short, activity-dependent splice variant of Homer1b/c, lacks the ability to link
mGluR1/5 to synaptic proteins and competitively disassemblessynaptic glutamatergic signaling complexes3–9. Using immunohisto-chemistry, we found that Homer1b/c were strongly expressedthroughout the spinal cord (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1online), whereas Homer1a was expressed at very low levels in naiverats. But expression of Homer1a was rapidly induced in the spinalcords of rats that developed peripheral hindpaw inflammation causedby unilateral, intraplantar injection of Complete Freund Adjuvant10
(CFA; Fig. 1a and Supplementary Table 1 online), which was furtherverified at the mRNA level by in situ hybridization (Fig. 1b) andreverse-transcription PCR (Fig. 1c) and at the protein level byimmunoprecipitation (Fig. 1d). Nociceptive neurons in the corre-sponding dorsal root ganglia (DRG) did not show inductionof Homer1a mRNA or protein (Supplementary Fig. 1 online),indicating that spinal neurons, but not presynaptic primary sensoryneurons, upregulate Homer1a after peripheral injury. Intrathecallumbar application of pharmacological inhibitors showed that block-ade of spinal NMDA receptors, extracellular signal–regulated proteinkinases (ERK1 and ERK2, herein referred to collectively as ERK1/2)or src kinases blocked spinal induction of Homer1a in the CFA model(P o 0.05 in all cases), whereas inhibition of mGluR1/5 had noeffect (Fig. 1e).
We generated virions of chimeric recombinant adeno-associatedvirus (AAV1/2)11 expressing both a small interfering hairpin RNA(shRNA) targeted against the 3¢ untranslated region of Homer1amRNA, which is unique to the Homer1a splice variant12, and EGFPbicistronically (AAV-shH1a). AAV-shRNA reduced expression ofHomer1a in cultured spinal neurons and in spinal cord in vivo incomparison with virions expressing both control shRNA and EGFPbicistronically (AAV-conRNA; Supplementary Fig. 2 online). Injec-tion of CFA into the hindpaw produced an acute upregulation ofHomer1a in the spinal dorsal horn of AAV-conRNA–expressing micebut not in AAV-shH1a–expressing mice, although the expression ofHomer1b/c remained similar across all groups (Supplementary Fig. 2and Supplementary Table 1 online). We then addressed how loss of
Received 6 June 2005; accepted 10 April 2006; published online 21 May 2006; doi:10.1038/nm1406
1Pharmacology Institute, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 366, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. 2Department of Molecular Medicine & Pathology,University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Auckland, New Zealand. 3Department of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care, Medical University of Vienna,Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. 4Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.5Present addresses: Institute for Neurobiology, IZN, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 364, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (M.K.).Kantonsschule Hohe Promenade, Promenadengasse 11, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland (M.U.E.). Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Medical Collegeof Cornell University, New York, New York 10021, USA (M.J.D.). 6These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence should be addressedto R.K. ([email protected]).
NATURE MEDICINE VOLUME 12 [ NUMBER 6 [ JUNE 2006 677
L E T T ERS©
2006
Nat
ure
Pub
lishi
ng G
roup
ht
tp://
ww
w.n
atur
e.co
m/n
atur
emed
icin
e
spinal Homer1a expression affects behavioral correlates of sensitiza-tion in pain pathways. In the plantar formalin test for early postin-flammatory hypersensitivity13, AAV-shH1a–expressing mice showed asignificant increase in the duration of phase II nocifensive behaviors, ameasure of spinal sensitization, compared with mice expressing AAV-conRNA (P ¼ 0.008), whereas phase I responses to formalin, ameasure of acute nociceptor activation, were not affected (Fig. 1f).In the CFA model of chronic inflammatory pain, expression of AAV-shH1a led to a long-lasting exacerbation of thermal hyperalgesia incomparison with AAV-conRNA (P r 0.005 at 24, 40, 48, 58 and 74 hafter CFA; Fig. 1g), although paw edema was comparable across allgroups (data not shown). Basic physiological pain responses weresimilar in all groups (Supplementary Fig. 3 online). Thus, whenactivity-induced upregulation of Homer1a is prevented, tissue inflam-mation leads to exaggerated pain plasticity and hyperalgesia in vivo.
How does Homer1a modulate inflammatory pain? Calcium ima-ging of acute Fura-2–loaded spinal slices of rats acutely expressingEGFP via recombinant Semliki Forest Virus (SFV) virions14 showedphasic and dose-dependent calcium responses of lamina I and IIneurons to bath application of glutamate, to the selective mGluR1/5agonist (RS)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) as well as toNMDA (Fig. 2a–c). In contrast, lamina I and II neurons acutely
a b
c d e f g
Control
Hom
er1b
/c-s
peci
ficH
omer
1a-s
peci
fic
Hom
er1a
GA
BA
B(1
)
Hom
er1a
IP: H
omer
1a-s
peci
ficIB
: Hom
er1a
-spe
cific
Lysa
teIB
: tub
ulin
-spe
cific
GA
BA
B(1
) Dur
atio
n of
noci
fens
ive
beha
vior
(s)
Per
cent
cha
nge
inpa
w w
ithdr
awal
late
ncy
InflamedIpsilateral toinflammation
Contralateral toinflammation Control
Contro
l
Infla
med
Ipsilateral toinflammation
Contralateral toinflammation
662 bp
0 h 6 h 12 h 80
60
40
*
*
**
*
**
**20
0
Saline
DMSO
4-CPG
D-APV
PD9805
9PP1
0 h
AAV-conRNA
AAV-shH1a
AAV-conRNA
AAV-shH1a
12 h
Per
cent
cha
nge
over
cont
rala
tera
l sid
e
631 bp
30 kDa
50 kDa
240200160
Phase 1 Phase 2
1208040
0
0Pre
Time after CFA injection (h)
16 24 40 48 58 74 96
–20
–40
–60
–80
Inflamed
Figure 1 Nociceptive activity–induced changes in spinal expression of Homer1 variants in a model of unilateral hindpaw inflammation. (a) Immuno-
histochemical analysis of expression of Homer1b/c and Homer1a in the spinal cord of rats in control or inflamed states. (b) In situ hybridization for
expression of mRNA encoding Homer1a or GABAB(1) on spinal cord of rats in control or inflamed states. In a and b, boxed areas are magnified in the
panels to the right. (c) Reverse-transcription PCR for expression of cDNA encoding Homer1a or GABAB(1), performed on cDNAs derived from spinal cords
of rats in control or inflamed states. (d) Western blot analysis shows an increase in Homer1a immunoprecipitated from lumbar spinal cord of mice in naive
or inflamed states. b-tubulin served as loading control. (e) Effects of lumbar intrathecal administration of pharmacological inhibitors D-APV, PD98059,
PP1 and 4-CPG to rats on inflammation-induced upregulation of Homer1a in the ipsilateral over contralateral spinal cord in comparison with vehicleadministration (n ¼ 5 rats per group). *P o 0.05. Scale bars, 200 mm. (f) Enhanced cumulative responses in the formalin test upon spinal expression
of Homer1a-specific shRNA (shH1a; n ¼ 10 rats) as compared to control RNA (conRNA; n ¼ 12 rats; P o 0.05). (g) Enhanced thermal hyperalgesia
in mice expressing shH1a spinally as compared to conRNA after CFA-induced hindpaw inflammation (*P o 0.005; n ¼ 9 for shH1a group and 12 for
conRNA group).
b
c d
SFV-EGFP
SFV-EGFP-Homer1a
DHPG Glutamate NMDAKCl
30 s
0.1
∆F34
0/F
380
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.3
Pea
k ca
lciu
m r
espo
nse
∆F34
0/F
380
Pea
k ca
lciu
m r
espo
nse
∆F34
0/F
380
DHPG
Glutam
ate
NMDA
KCl
DHPG
Glutam
ate
NMDA
KCl
DHPG
Glutam
ate
NMDA
KCl
* * **
**
* * *5
10
15
20
25
Inte
grat
ed c
alci
umre
spon
se (
AU
C)
AAV-EGFPSFV-EGFP SFV-EGFP-Homer1aAAV-Homer1a
a
SF
V-E
GF
P
SF
V-E
GF
P-H
omer
1a
EGFPfluorescence
Peak afterglutamateBasal
EGFPfluorescence
Peak afterglutamateBasal
480 nm480 nm 340 nm340 nm
Figure 2 Calcium imaging using Fura-2 on acute spinal slices derived from
rats expressing EGFP or EGFP-tagged Homer1a via gene delivery mediated
by SFV or AAV virions to the spinal dorsal horn in vivo. (a) Visualization of
location of SFV-EGFP (control) or SFV-EGFP-Homer1a injection via EGFP
fluorescence and typical examples of changes in F340 induced by glutamate.
Boxed areas are magnified in the panels at the right. Dashed lines delineate
gray matter. Scale bars, 100 mm. (b) Typical examples of F340/380 traces
showing calcium mobilization upon application of glutamate, NMDA, DHPG
or KCl. Bars represent period of agonist application. (c) Average DF340/380
ratios showing peak calcium responses or average integrated calcium
responses calculated as the area under the curve (AUC) are significantlyreduced in spinal slices expressing SFV-Homer1a in comparison with SFV-
EGFP in response to DHPG (P o 0.001), glutamate (P o 0.001) or NMDA
(P o 0.001), whereas KCl-evoked responses remain unchanged
(P ¼ 0.3). (d) Similar results were obtained in spinal slices expressing AAV-
Homer1a and AAV-EGFP. Data are derived from at least five slices per group.
L E T TERS
678 VOLUME 12 [ NUMBER 6 [ JUNE 2006 NATURE MEDICINE
©20
06 N
atur
e P
ublis
hing
Gro
up
http
://w
ww
.nat
ure.
com
/nat
urem
edic
ine
expressing EGFP-tagged Homer1a via SFV virions showed a largereduction in peak as well as integrated calcium responses to glutamate,DHPG and NMDA (P o 0.05 compared to EGFP group in all cases;Fig. 2a–c). Furthermore, long-term expression of EGFP or Homer1ain the spinal dorsal horn via AAV virions15 led to very similar effects(Fig. 2d), providing a link to behavioral experiments in vivo. Indissociated cultured spinal neurons, we obtained similar results withrespect to calcium mobilization induced by DHPG or glutamate(Supplementary Fig. 4 online), although NMDA-induced calciumresponses were not affected by expression of Homer1a, suggesting arequirement for precise neuronal connectivity and receptor assemblyfor modulation of NMDA receptor–mediated calcium mobilization byHomer1a. The preserved integrity of slices or cultured neuronsexpressing Homer1a was shown by their normal responses to bathapplication of KCl (Fig. 2b,c) or agonists of other Gq/11-coupledreceptors, which are unrelated to Homer1 protein interactions, suchsubstance P, carbachol or bradykinin (Supplementary Fig. 4).Although expression of Homer1a has been reported to be associatedwith constitutive activation of heterologously expressed mGluR5 incultured cerebellar neurons16, we found that basal levels ofcalcium were not substantially altered upon expression ofHomer1a in spinal neurons in dissociated cultures or in spinal slices(Supplementary Fig. 4).
To address whether Homer1a could potentially influence spinalnociceptive processing by modulating synaptic spines on spinalneurons, we imaged spines on lamina V neurons in acutely preparedspinal slices from rats expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein(EGFP) or EGFP-Homer1a in vivo as described above (Fig. 3a). Spinalneurons expressing Homer1a showed a significantly reduced densityof spines on proximal dendrites as compared to neurons expressingEGFP alone (P o 0.001; Fig. 3a,b). In dissociated cultures, the
dendrites of Homer1a-expressing spinal neurons showed reduceddensity of puncta immunoreactive for the presynaptic marker proteinsynaptophysin or for the postsynaptic marker proteins PSD-95 or theNR1 subunit of NMDA receptors as compared with EGFP-expressingspinal neurons (P o 0.05 in each case; Fig. 3b), suggesting reducedsynaptic localization of NMDA receptors in Homer1a-expressingneurons. Recent studies show that molecular pathways linkingmGluR1/5 and NMDA receptors located in synaptic membranes tointracellular MAP kinases such as ERK1/2 require long-form Homerproteins such as Homer1b/c17. ERK1/2 are important messengerslinking synaptic activity to nuclear transcriptional control of plasti-city-related genes, including those involved in the development ofcentral sensitization and chronic pain18. We observed that bothDHPG- and NMDA-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 as well asnuclear translocation of phosphorylated, activated ERK1/2 (pERK1/2)were significantly lower in Homer1a-expressing neurons than inEGFP-expressing neurons (P o 0.05; Fig. 3c–e). Do these in vitrofindings hold true in the spinal cord in vivo upon physiologicalactivation of glutamate receptors by nociceptive activity? We observedthat the increase in the number of pERK+ cells in the ipsilateralsuperficial spinal dorsal horn induced by intraplantar injection offormalin was significantly higher in mice expressing EGFP than inmice expressing Homer1a in the spinal dorsal horn (P o 0.01;Fig. 3f,g). In contrast, mice expressing AAV-shH1a showed a signifi-cantly greater induction of pERK1/2 with formalin than mice injectedintraspinally with AAV-conRNA (P o 0.01; Fig. 3f,g). These resultsshow that both endogenously and exogenously expressed Homer1acounteracts activation of ERK1/2 induced by nociceptive activity inthe spinal dorsal horn in vivo.
A crucial question that arises is whether these basic findings can beapplied to develop new therapeutic approaches for the treatment of
a
c d
f g
e
bSFV-EGFP SFV-EGFP
SFV-EGFP-Homer1a
SFV-EGFP
Synapto-physin
PSD-95
NR1Den
sity
of s
pine
s/10
µm
Fol
d in
crea
se o
ver
basa
l lev
el
Nuc
lear
tran
sloc
atio
n of
pE
RK
(per
cent
tota
l cel
ls)
Num
ber
of p
ER
K+ c
ells
Imm
unor
eact
ive
punc
ta/1
0 µm
4
3
2
1
210
10
20
30
20
30
40
4
6
8
10
12
1*
*
*
**
*
*
*
**
*
* *234567
in vivo in vitro
SFV-EGFP-Homer1a
pERK1Bas
al
DHPG
NMDA
Basal
DHPG
NMDA
DHPG
NMDA
DHPG
NMDA
DHPG
Untre
ated
NMDA
pERK2
pERK1 pERK2
ERK1
AAV-EGFP AAV-Homer1a
AAV-EGFP AAV-Homer1a
AAV-EGFP
AAV-EGFP
Basal Induced Induced
Basal Induced
Basal Induced
Induced
AAV-Homer1a
AAV-Homer1a
AAV-conRNA
AAV-conRNA
AAV-shH1a
AAV-shRNA
AAV-EGFPAAV-Homer1a
Figure 3 Effects of Homer1a expression on
spine density and activation of ERK1/2 in
the spinal cord. (a) Low-, medium- and
high-magnification (insets) views of lamina
V neurons (arrowhead) with dendritic spines
in spinal slices from rats expressing either
SFV-EGFP or SFV-EGFP-Homer1a in vivo.
Scale bars: left, 100 mm; middle, 40 mm; inset,
10 mm. (b) Reduced dendritic spine density in
neurons expressing EGFP-tagged Homer1a as
compared to EGFP judged either as EGFP+
spines in spinal slices labeled in vivo (left) or
spines immunoreactive for synaptophysin,
PSD-95 or NR1 in spinal neurons cultured
in vitro (right). *P o 0.05 in all cases.(c,d) Typical examples (c) and quantitative
summary (d) of western blot analysis of total
ERK1 or phosphorylated ERK1 and ERK2
(pERK1 and pERK2, respectively) on cultured
spinal neurons expressing AAV-EGFP or AAV-
Homer1a upon treatment with DHPG or NMDA
or a mock treatment (basal). (e) Quantification
of cultured spinal neurons showing a nuclear
localization of pERK1/2-specific immunoreactivity
from experiments described in a. (f,g) Typical
examples (f) and quantification (g) of intraplantar
formalin-induced pERK1/2 immunoreactivity in
spinal dorsal horns of mice expressing AAV-EGFP,
AAV-Homer1a, AAV-conRNA or AAV-shH1a.
*P o 0.01, at least three mice per group
per treatment. Scale bar in f, 200 mm.
L E T T ERS
NATURE MEDICINE VOLUME 12 [ NUMBER 6 [ JUNE 2006 679
©20
06 N
atur
e P
ublis
hing
Gro
up
http
://w
ww
.nat
ure.
com
/nat
urem
edic
ine
inflammatory pain. We addressed this question preclinically usinggene transfer with AAV1/2 virions to the spinal dorsal horns ofsegments receiving nociceptive inputs from the hindlimbs in mice(Fig. 4a). Titers of injected AAV-Homer1a virions were carefullyadjusted to achieve a level of Homer1a expression comparable tothe levels induced by peripheral inflammation (i.e., about twofold;Supplementary Table 1). Although mice expressing Homer1a,Homer1c or EGFP in the spinal dorsal horn were indistinguishablewith respect to nociceptive behavior in several tests such as the tail-flick reflex or hindpaw withdrawal in response to heat, cold orpressure10, responses to intraplantar capsaicin or with respect tomotor performance (Supplementary Fig. 3), mice expressingHomer1a showed a small but statistically significant reduction inphase I responses to intraplantar formalin (P o 0.05). Notably,Homer1a-overexpressing mice showed a significant reduction in themagnitude of the phase II response to formalin over mice over-expressing Homer1c (P ¼ 0.01 and P ¼ 0.014, respectively) orexpressing EGFP (P ¼ 0.003 and P ¼ 0.011, respectively; Fig. 4b),suggesting a reduction of acute short-term plasticity in the spinaldorsal horn by Homer1a. Moreover, in the CFA test, the magnitude aswell as the duration of thermal hyperalgesia was lower in Homer1a-overexpressing mice as compared to Homer1c-overexpressing orEGFP-expressing mice (P o 0.004; Fig. 4c).
Thus far, endogenous protective mechanisms, which seek to balanceand counter pronociceptive synaptic plasticity, have focused on the
release of inhibitory neuromodulators such as endorphins and endo-cannabinoids. Here, we propose a novel feedback mechanism, basedon activity-dependent remodeling of glutamatergic synapses throughmodulation of protein-protein interactions. Several factors, includingthe ability of Homer1a to attenuate inflammatory hypersensitivitywithout significantly affecting physiological pain or other neurologicalfunctions (for example, motor coordination or locomotion) favor theidea of therapeutically exploiting the functions of Homer1 proteins inchronic pain. Although intraparenchymal injections with recombinantAAV virions were used here mainly as proof-of-principle tools forillustrating the efficacy of Homer1a as a therapeutic target, they alsolay a basis for developing less invasive tools for future clinicalapplications. In conclusion, our observation that synaptic molecularscaffolds can be directly regulated by nociceptive activity to modulatepain processing underscores their potential relevance as novel classof therapeutic targets against chronic pain. In particular, we haveidentified and validated Homer1a as a therapeutic target in thetreatment of inflammatory pain.
METHODSFor details, see Supplementary Methods online.
Mouse models of postinflammatory pain. All animal procedures were
performed in accordance with ethical guidelines laid down by the local
governing body (Regierungsprasidium Karlsruhe, Germany). We carried out
all behavioral measurements in awake, unrestrained, age-matched adult (43
month old) male C57BL6 mice or Wistar rats. We administered unilateral
injections of CFA (Sigma Aldrich) into the intraplantar surface of the hindpaw
as previously described10 to rats (100 ml) or mice (20 ml), and injected control
rats and mice with 0.9% saline. We analyzed latency of paw withdrawal in
response to noxious heat, paw pressure and tail-flick reflex as previously
described19 (Ugo Basile, Inc.). We determined paw response to cold by
measuring the frequency of paw withdrawal in response to plantar application
of acetone, which we applied five times at intervals of 3 min. We performed the
intraplantar formalin test as previously described13,19.
Calcium imaging on spinal slices. We injected rats with SFV virions at a
titer of 106 in spinal dorsal horns at postnatal days (P)13–18, and sectioned
acute spinal cord slices (400 mm) at 16 h after injection as described below.
We incubated slices at 32 1C for 30 min with incubation buffer gassed with
carbogen (5% CO2 in 95% O2) and consisting of the following (in mM):
95 NaCl, 1.8 KCl, 1.2 KH2PO4, 0.5 CaCl2, 7 MgCl2, 26 NaHCO3, 15 glucose
and 50 sucrose. We loaded slices with Fura-2 AM (10 mM) in the presence
of pluronic acid (0.1%) and Hepes (20 mM), de-esterified them and trans-
ferred them to a perfusion chamber superfused (2.5 ml/min) with carbogen-
aerated perfusion buffer consisting of the following (in mM): 127 NaCl, 1.8
KCl, 1.2 KH2PO4, 2.4 CaCl2, 1.3 MgCl2, 26 NaHCO3 and 15 glucose. We
applied agonists by bath application for 10 s and used a 10-min washout
interval between subsequent applications. We calculated F340/380 ratios as
described previously20. Calcium imaging experiments on spinal slices of
mice injected intraspinally with AAV-EGFP or AAV-HA-Homer1a were
followed by immunohistochemistry to detect expression of hemagglutinin-
tagged Homer1a.
Injection of AAV virions. The construction of the AAV viruses expressing
Homer1a, Homer1c or EGFP used in this manuscript has been previously
described15. We anesthetized adult mice with Fentanyl:Domitor:Dormicum
(4:6:16; 0.7 ml/g; intraperitoneal) and we infused 300 nl of a 2:1 mixture of AAV
viral stocks with 20% mannitol (to enhance vector spread and improve
transduction13) containing 1.2 � 107 virions four times bilaterally (two times
on each side) directly into the spinal parenchyma of spinal segments L3–L5.
Infusion rate was maintained at about 66 nl/min using a microprocessor-
controlled minipump (World Precision Instruments), which limits tissue
damage. By regulating titer and volume of the injected vectors and the angle
of micropipette placement, we achieved selective expression of proteins at the
desired levels in spinal dorsal horn over 2–3 mm along the rostrocaudal axis
D
L
V
M
a
b
c
Injection:
Antibody:
AAV-HA-Homer1a
AAV-HA-Homer1c AAV-EGFP
HA-specific EGFPfluorescence
0
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
–20
–40
–60
–80
Dur
atio
n of
noci
fens
ive
beha
vior
(s)
Per
cent
cha
nge
in p
aw w
ithdr
awal
late
ncy
Phase 1 Phase 2
Pre 16 24 40 48
*
*
* **
*
Time after CFA injection (h)
AAV-EGFP
AAV-Homer1c
AAV-Homer1a
AAV-EGFP AAV-Homer1c AAV-Homer1a
Figure 4 Effects of spinal expression of AAV-Homer1a, AAV-Homer1c
(both tagged with hemagglutinin epitope) or EGFP (control) on nocifensive
behavior associated with inflammatory pain in mice in vivo.
(a) Representative examples of EGFP fluorescence or immunohistochemistry
with an HA-specific antibody in transduced spinal dorsal horn. Scale bar,
200 mm. (b) Reduced cumulative responses in the formalin test upon spinal
expression of AAV-Homer1a as compared to AAV-Homer1c or AAV-EGFP
*P o 0.05 (n ¼ 10, 11 and 10 for the EGFP, Homer1c and Homer1a
groups, respectively). (c) Spinal expression of Homer1a, but not of
Homer1c, reduces the magnitude of thermal hyperalgesia produced by
intraplantar injection of CFA. *P o 0.002 for all time points (n ¼ 10,
11 and 11 for the EGFP, Homer1c and Homer1a groups, respectively).
L E T TERS
680 VOLUME 12 [ NUMBER 6 [ JUNE 2006 NATURE MEDICINE
©20
06 N
atur
e P
ublis
hing
Gro
up
http
://w
ww
.nat
ure.
com
/nat
urem
edic
ine
without significant spread into the ventral horn. We allowed mice to recover for
3 weeks before commencing behavioral analysis. For calcium imaging
experiments, we injected rats at P11 and analyzed them at P19.
shRNA experiments. For generation of mouse Homer1a-specific shRNAs, we
searched the 3¢ untranslated region of the Homer1a mRNA12 using a shRNA
Design Algorithm (Cenix Biosciences). We generated oligonucleotides corre-
sponding to Homer1a-specific shRNA (shH1a; sense strand, 5¢-GGAGCAUUG
AGCUAAUUAUTT-3¢; antisense strand, 5¢-AUAAUUAGCUCAAUGCUC
CTT-3¢; Sigma Genosyses), annealed them and cloned them into an AAV
plasmid that simultaneously drives the expression of the shRNAs and EGFP as
previously described15. This sequence is targeted against Exon 5¢ of the Homer1
gene, which is unique to the Homer1a transcript and functions as an intron in
the other Homer slice variants12. A BLAST search with the sequences did not
uncover any homology with other genes. Similarly, a control shRNA (sense
strand, 5¢-GUACUGCUUACGAUACGGTT-3¢; antisense strand, 5¢-CCGUAU
CGUAAGCAGUACUTT-3¢) was cloned and packaged (AAV-conRNA) to serve
as a negative control for potential unspecific effects associated with delivery of
shRNA. We added approximately 108 viral genomes to the culture medium
of cultured spinal neurons (106) at 14 d in vitro in 10-cm dishes and
injected approximately 108 viral particles in the spinal parenchyma in mice,
as described above.
Data analysis and statistics. All data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. Analysis of
variance (ANOVA) for random measures was performed followed by post hoc
Fisher test to determine statistically significant differences. P o 0.05 was
considered significant.
Accession codes. GenBank: Homer1a splice variant, AF425674.
Note: Supplementary information is available on the Nature Medicine website.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe authors are grateful to P.F. Worley for the gift of rat Homer1a and Homer1ccDNAs; P.H. Seeburg for the gift of a plasmid containing the Homer1a 3¢ UTR;M. Schaefer, B. Heinke and O. Friedrich for help with calcium imagingexperiments; and to T. Kuner and S. Offermanns for critically reading an earlierversion of this manuscript. This work was supported by an Emmy Noether-program fellowship from the Deutsches Forschunggemeinschaft to R.K.
COMPETING INTERESTS STATEMENTThe authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
Published online at http://www.nature.com/naturemedicine/
Reprints and permissions information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/
reprintsandpermissions/
1. Sandkuhler, J. Learning and memory in pain pathways. Pain 88, 113–118 (2000).2. Woolf, C.J. & Salter, M.W. Neuronal plasticity: increasing the gain in pain. Science 288,
1765–1768 (2000).3. Xiao, B., Cheng, T.J. & Worley, P.F. Homer: a link between neural activity and glutamate
receptor function. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10, 370–374 (2000).4. Ehrengruber, M.U., Kato, A., Inokuchi, K. & Hennou, S. Homer/Vesl proteins and their
roles in CNS neurons. Mol. Neurobiol. 29, 213–228 (2004).5. Tu, J.C. et al. Homer binds a novel proline-rich motif and links group 1 metabotropic
glutamate receptors with IP3 receptors. Neuron 21, 717–726 (1998).6. Yuan, J.P. et al. Homer binds TRPC family channels and is required for gating of TRPC1
by IP3 receptors. Cell 114, 777–789 (2003).7. Fagni, L., Chavis, P., Ango, F. & Bockaert, J. Complex interactions between mGluRs,
intracellular Ca2+ stores and ion channels in neurons. Trends Neurosci. 23, 80–88(2000).
8. Feng, W. et al. Homer regulates gain of ryanodine receptor type 1 channel complex.J. Biol. Chem. 277, 44722–44730 (2002).
9. Tu, J.C. et al. Coupling of mGluR/Homer and PSD-95 complexes by the Shank family ofpostsynaptic density proteins. Neuron 23, 583–592 (1999).
10. Hargreaves, K., Dubner, F., Brown, F., Flores, C. & Joris, J. A new and sensitive methodfor measuring thermal nociception in cutaneous hyperalgesia. Pain 32, 77–88 (1988).
11. During, M.J., Young, D., Baer, K., Lawlor, P. & Klugmann, M. Development andoptimization of adeno-associated virus vector transfer into the central nervous system.Methods Mol. Med. 76, 221–236 (2003).
12. Bottai, D. et al. Synaptic activity-induced conversion of intronic to exonic sequence inHomer 1 immediate early gene expression. J. Neurosci. 22, 167–175 (2002).
13. Tjolsen, A., Berge, O.G., Hunskaar, S., Rosland, J.H. & Hole, K. The formalin test: anevaluation of the method. Pain 51, 5–17 (1992).
14. Hennou, S. et al. Homer-1a/Vesl-1S enhances hippocampal synaptic transmission.Eur. J. Neurosci. 18, 811–819 (2003).
15. Klugmann, M. et al. AAV-mediated hippocampal expression of short and long Homer 1proteins differentially affect cognition and seizure activity in adult rats. Mol. Cell.Neurosci. 28, 347–360 (2005).
16. Ango, F. et al. Agonist-independent activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors bythe intracellular protein Homer. Nature 411, 962–965 (2001).
17. Yang, L. et al. A novel Ca2+-independent signaling pathway to extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase by coactivation of NMDA receptors and metabotropic gluta-mate receptor 5 in neurons. J. Neurosci. 24, 10846–10857 (2004).
18. Ji, R.R., Baba, H., Brenner, G.J. & Woolf, C.J. Nociceptive-specific activation of ERK inspinal neurons contributes to pain hypersensitivity. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 1114–1119(1999).
19. Hartmann, B. et al. The AMPA receptor subunits GluR-a and GluR-b reciprocallymodulate spinal synaptic plasticity and inflammatory pain. Neuron 44, 637–650(2004).
20. Grynkiewicz, G., Poenie, M. & Tsien, R.Y. A new generation of Ca2+ indicators withgreatly improved fluorescence properties. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 3440–3450 (1985).
L E T T ERS
NATURE MEDICINE VOLUME 12 [ NUMBER 6 [ JUNE 2006 681
©20
06 N
atur
e P
ublis
hing
Gro
up
http
://w
ww
.nat
ure.
com
/nat
urem
edic
ine