system size and energy dependence of strangeness production
DESCRIPTION
System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Production. Sevil Salur Yale University for the STAR Collaboration. p T spectra and kinetic freeze-out of particles . Investigation of strange particle yields and ratios. Study of resonances (thermal vs chemical freeze-outs ) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
[email protected] Matter 2005
1
System Size and Energy Dependence System Size and Energy Dependence of Strangeness Productionof Strangeness Production
Sevil SalurSevil Salur
Yale University
for the STAR Collaboration
[email protected] Matter 2005
2
pT spectra and kinetic freeze-out of particles . Investigation of strange particle yields and ratios.
Study of resonances (thermal vs chemical freeze-outs )
Comparison of RHIC and SPS yields Strangeness enhancement
(Energy dependence & source type) RAA comparison with RCP and RdAu
Investigation of strangeness ordering. Is there a scaling in Au+Au production for the strange
quarks? N Participants vs N Binary ?
Outline
[email protected] Matter 2005
3
200 GeV Au+Au
ssssss200 GeV Au+Au
udss200 GeV Au+Au
dssss200 GeV Au+Au
The Corrected Strange ParticleSpectra
200 GeV p+p 200 GeV p+p
200 GeV d+Au
200 GeV d+Au 200 GeV d+Au
62 GeV Au+Au 62 GeV Au+Au 62 GeV Au+Au
*(1520) (ud*(1520) (udss))**(uu(uuss))
QM Posters:
R. Bellwied,
M.Lamont,
C.Markert,
M.Munhoz&J.Takahashi,
J.Speltz
Y-4 Au+Au and Y-5 Cu+Cu is in Y-4 Au+Au and Y-5 Cu+Cu is in progress !progress !
[email protected] Matter 2005
4
• ,K, p <T> at 200 GeV > 62 GeV Tkin at 200 GeV =62 GeV
• <T> at 200 GeV = 62 GeV Tkin at 200 GeV >62 GeV
Tkinetic vs Transverse velocity (<T>)
Tkinetic from a Blast-Wave is not same as the Temperature from a Hydro Model.
QM Poster: J.Speltz
• Temperature Tkinetic is higher for baryons with higher strange quark content for Blast-wave fits.
• Spectral shapes are different.
Most Central Collisions
0.13
T=100 MeV
T=132 MeV
[email protected] Matter 2005
5
STAR Preliminary
QM Poster: M.Munhoz&J.Takahashi
• s-Baryon production is ~constant at mid-rapidity.
STAR Preliminary
Strange Baryon Production and Collision Energy…
s-Baryon production equals s-Baryon at RHIC Energies!
s-Baryon rises smoothly at mid-rapidity.
• s-Baryon Resonance follow the same trend.
Au+Au
Pb+Pb
STAR Preliminary
[email protected] Matter 2005
6
/ ratios are approximately independent of the system
size at RHIC energies.
Strange ParticleRatios vs System Size
independent of system size at 200 GeV and equal to p+p values at lower energies.
QM Poster: C Markert, D. Mishra
Re-scattering and regeneration is needed ! t > 0, constant for different centralities!Regeneration σ(K*) > σ(*)
[email protected] Matter 2005
7
and yields in AuAurelative to pp
rises.
System Size Dependence at 200 GeV
Correlation volume not well modelled by Npart
Is the scaling more important than normalization ?
Canonical suppression increases with increasing
strangeness
and arenot flat
Redlich et al.
[email protected] Matter 2005
8
s-Quarks Have Different Scaling!
Scaling according to quark content?
u, d – scale with Npart
– already observed.
s – scale with Nbin
– appears better for strange particles.
K0s – 1/2*Npart + 1/2*Nbin
p – Npart
– 2/3*Npart + 1/3*Nbin
– 1/3*Npart + 2/3*Nbin
– Nbin
– Nbin
Npart
Does strangeness “see” a significant NBin contribution?
Normalized to central data
QM Poster: H. Caines
is puzzling!
[email protected] Matter 2005
9
Nuclear Modification Factor Rcp
0-5%
40-60%Y-4 K0
s
√sNN=200 GeV
Baryons and mesons are different !
QM Poster: M.Lamont
62 GeV Rcp shows less suppression.
√sNN=62 GeV 0-5%
40-60%
Baryon and meson suppression sets in at different pT .
[email protected] Matter 2005
10
Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 052302 Au+Au √sNN=200 GeV
Au+Au √sNN=62 GeV
STAR Preliminary
Baryon and meson suppression sets in at
same quark pT .
0-5%
40-60%
√sNN=200 GeV
Nuclear Modification Factor Rcp
Coalescence vs Fragmentation?
0-5%
40-60%
Baryon and meson suppression sets in at
different pT .
Y-4 K0s
√sNN=200 GeV
[email protected] Matter 2005
11
s-quark
Ordering with strangeness content!
Mesons (h+ + h-, K0s , ) follow
similar trends.
Strange baryons don’t show suppression.
Rcp Raa for strange baryons. Canonical suppression in p+p …?
s-quarks scaled with NBin
u&d-quarks scaled with Npart
scaled with N Part
STA
R
Pre
limin
ary
Au+Au
p+p
0-5%
√sNN=200 GeV
s-quarks scaled with NBin
u&d-quarks scaled with Npart
scaled with N Bin
STA
R
Pre
limin
ary
Au+Au
p+p
0-5%
√sNN=200 GeV
RAA of Strange Particles
STAR Preliminary
Au+Au
p+p
0-5%
√sNN=200 GeV
STA
R
Pre
limin
ary
Particles with strange quarks scale differently than non-
strange!
[email protected] Matter 2005
12
Does entropy drive the strangeness yield?
SPS and RHIC data follows same curves…
Is there a universal scaling?
Enhancements are the same or even bigger at RHIC than at SPS !
Instead of Npart dNch/dη
Correlated to the entropy of the system!
[email protected] Matter 2005
13
Summary and Conclusions
Transverse velocity T increases with collision energy.
TFO > TFOfrom Blast-wave but TFO = TFOfrom Hydro
s-Baryon production equals that of s-Baryon at RHIC energies.Baryon transport is ~ independent of system size at RHIC energies.
Rescattering and regeneration are required to model resonance production. Cross-sections and lifetimes vary (K* vs *). t > 0 between chemical and thermal freezeout for all centralities.
RAA different than RCP - canonical suppression is being investigated in RAA and RdAu .
Coalescence can explain the meson baryon difference at 62 GeV collisions too.
Particles with s-quarks appear to scale differently than non-s quarks. Maybe s-quarks “see“ a different correlation volume than light quarks?
Yields scale with dNch/d for SPS and RHIC
(universal scaling?)
[email protected] Matter 2005
14
• 19 D. Mishra Measurement of++ and K∗ production in d+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV
• 33 G. Van Buren The Ratio at RHIC • 60 R. Bellwied Strange particle production mechanisms in pp collisions at RHIC • 61 B. Bezverkhny Initial studies of two particle azimuthal correlations using baryons
in collisions at RHIC• 67 L. Gaillard Identified two-hadron correlations at STAR using , and K0
s with charged hadrons in AuAu at √sNN = 200 GeV
• 131 H. Caines The effects of varying the correlation volume on strangeness • 146 M. A. Lamont High momentum strange baryon anomalies in heavy ion collisions at
RHIC • 151 C. Markert The influence of medium properties on the resonance production in
RHIC collision• 152 C. M. Mironov STAR measurements of strange hadron R AuAu and R dAu
• 155 M. G. Munhoz Measurements of K0s and production in collisions at
√sNN = 62 GeV Au+Au • 163 F. Simon Forward production and nuclear stopping power in d+Au
collisions at RHIC • 164 J. Speltz Energy dependence systematics of strange and multi-strange
particle production • 167 A. Tang Strangelet search at RHIC
Strange Poster Presentations:
[email protected] Matter 2005
16
[email protected] Matter 2005
17
Nuclear Modification Factor RdAu
QM Poster: C. Mironov
Resonances follow a similar trend !
Cronin Effect might explain R dAu above 1
Less so for mesons than baryons !
d+Au
p+p
√sNN=200 GeV