teacher effectiveness methodology
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Teacher Effectiveness
ADE Educator Evaluation Summit
MethodologyText
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 2: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
singleThe impact of an effectiveis the
student learning
teacher
most important factor in
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 3: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
60%Nearly
of the impact on student achievement is attributable to
principal teacherand
effectiveness* New Leaders for New Schools (2009)
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 4: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
YETvary minimally
principalteacherand
evaluation scores
failing to distinguish from great to good, good to fair, or fair to poor
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 5: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
how can districts If 98% of teachers have the same rating,
use evaluation data for
decision making?
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 6: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
dualMCESA tools serve
forprincipal teacherand
purposes(human resources • professional development)
evaluations
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 7: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• The State Board of Education shall...”on or before December 15, 2011 adopt and maintain a model framework for a teacher and principal evaluation instrument that includes quantitative data on student academic progress that accounts for between thirty-three percent and fifty per cent of the evaluation outcomes and best practices for professional development and evaluator training. School districts and charter schools shall use an instrument that meets the data requirements established by the State Board of Education to annually evaluate individual teachers and principals beginning in school year 2012 – 2013.”
New AZ laws require
for schools and districts
changesArizona Revised Statutes
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 8: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
must includeBy next year, evaluations
multiple measuresThursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 9: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 10: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
of educator33% - 50%
must be measured by student academic
progress
effectiveness
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 11: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
40% 5%50%School Growth
5%Team Growth
5%
Individual Growth40%
Observation50%
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 12: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Designation Ineffective Partially Effective Effective 1 Effective 2 Highly Effective
REIL Growth Composite Rating
12345
1 2 3 4 5
Small Group Calibration Exercise
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 13: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Example Learning Observation Rating Scale...
Score Description
1Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 1 on average (based on 5 observations)
2Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 2 on average (based on 5 observations)
3Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 3 on average (based on 5 observations)
4Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 3 and 4 on average (based on 5 observations)
5Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 3, 4, and 5 on average (based on 5 observations)
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 14: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Example Learning Observation Rating Scale...
Score Description
1Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 1 on average (based on 5 observations)
2Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 2 on average (based on 5 observations)
3Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 3 on average (based on 5 observations)
4Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 3 and 4 on average (based on 5 observations)
5Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 3, 4, and 5 on average (based on 5 observations)
50% of Score
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 15: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Example Growth Scale50% of Score
Score Growth Designation Example: AIMs Value-Added Model Results
1 Well Below Expectations
On average, students’ AIMS scores are far below expected scores based on prior achievement, student & classroom characteristics (95% statistical con!dence that average growth is below the 20th percentile statewide).
2 Below Expectations On average, students’ AIMS scores are below expected scores based on prior achievement, student & classroom characteristics (95% statistical con!dence that average growth is below the statewide average).
3 Expected Growth (Average/Typical)
On average, students’ AIMS scores are not statistically different from expected scores based on prior achievement, student & classroom characteristics.
4 Above Expectations On average, students’ AIMS scores are above expected scores based on prior achievement, student & classroom characteristics (95% statistical con!dence that average growth is above the statewide average).
5 Well Above Expectations
On average, students’ AIMS scores are above expected scores based on prior achievement, student & classroom characteristics (95% statistical con!dence that average growth is above the 80th percentile statewide).
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 16: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Designation Ineffective Partially Effective Effective 1 Effective 2 Highly Effective
REIL Growth Composite Rating
12345
1 2 3 4 5
Small Group Calibration Exercise
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 17: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Merging Observation
student academic progress...
&Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 18: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Determining tool
&scale for observation
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 19: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Selecting measures
&calculations for student growth
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 20: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Appropriatevaluesin
establishingeffectiveness
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 21: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
ObservationInstrument
Quantitative MeasuresDetermining Model for OverallEffectiveness
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 22: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
MCESA Tools
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 23: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 24: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
ObservationCycle
4 +16 + 2 = 22Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 25: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Unadjusted Rubric Weights Within REIL LOI
Learning Community18%
Content23%
Formative Assessment14%
Instructional Strategies27%
Learner Engagement18%
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 26: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Unadjusted Rubric Weights Within REIL LOI
Instructional Strategies
Learning Community
Formative Assessment
Content
Learner Engagement
= 4 Element Scores (18%)
= 6 Element Scores (27%)
= 3 Element Scores (14%)
= 5 Element Scores (23%)
= 4 Element Scores (18%)
222120191817161514131211109876543210
Num
ber o
f Ele
men
t Sco
res
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 27: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Instructional Strategies
Learning Community
Formative Assessment
Content
Learner Engagement
Content Accessibility20%
Conceptual Understanding
20%Connections to
Content20%
Task Analysis40%
Content Element WeightsRubric Weights
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 28: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 29: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 30: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 31: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
evaluatorsPeer
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 32: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
ObservationInstrument
Quantitative MeasuresDetermining Model for OverallEffectiveness
Thursday, September 13, 2012
![Page 33: Teacher Effectiveness Methodology](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051514/5482052db47959f10c8b46d2/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Thursday, September 13, 2012