technical drawing geometry portfolio rubric-student version

1
Name: _____________________________________ Form: ___________ Technical Drawing Plane and Solid Geometry Portfolio Rubric Linework & Neatness 7-8 Drawings very detailed/ complex. There are many features on the objects. The drawings have no messy or missing lines, dimensions, or other drafting features. 6-4 Drawings somewhat detailed/ complex. There are many features on the objects. The drawings have few messy or missing lines, dimensions, or other drafting features. 3-2 Drawings not detailed/ complex. There are few features on the objects. The drawings have some messy or missing lines, dimensions, or other drafting features. 0-1 Drawings not detailed/ complex. There are very few features on the objects. The drawings have many missing or missing lines, dimensions, or other drafting features. Accuracy 8-10 All drawings contain correct: plane geometry/ solid geometry, line weight and line style usage, dimensioning standards, use of scales, use of title blocks and borders and are neat with an excellent overall visual presentation. 5-7 Most drawings contain correct: plane geometry/ solid geometry, line weight and line style usage, dimensioning standards, use of scales, use of title blocks and borders and are neat with an average overall visual presentation. 2-4 Some drawings contain correct: plane geometry/ solid geometry, line weight and line style usage, dimensioning standards, use of scales, use of title blocks and borders. The visual presentation is below average. 0-1 Many drawings are missing correct: plane geometry/ solid geometry, line weight and line style usage, dimensioning standards, use of scales, use of title blocks and borders. Overall visual presentation is poor. Practical Ability/ Construction 10-12 The drawings represent skills that reflect a thorough knowledge of plane geometry/solid geometry. Line weights and line styles are accurate. 9-7 The drawings represent an adequate knowledge of plane geometry/ solid geometry. Line weights and line styles are mostly accurate and neat. Lines are mostly straight, square, and precise. 4-6 The drawings represent a fair knowledge of plane geometry /solid geometry. Line weights and line styles are fairly accurate and neat. Lines are fairly straight, square, and precise. 0-3 The drawings represent little knowledge of plane geometry / solid geometry. Line weights and line styles are not accurate or neat. Lines are not straight, square, and precise. Total Points Scored: _________________/30 * RUBRIC TO BE USED FOR BOTH SECTIONS OF THE PORTFOLIO

Upload: olvernejacobs9741

Post on 22-Jan-2016

104 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

student grading rubric

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Technical Drawing Geometry Portfolio Rubric-Student Version

Name: _____________________________________ Form: ___________

Technical Drawing Plane and Solid Geometry Portfolio Rubric Linework &

Neatness

7-8

Drawings very detailed/ complex.

There are many features on the objects.

The drawings have no messy or missing lines,

dimensions, or other drafting features.

6-4

Drawings somewhat detailed/ complex.

There are many features on the

objects. The drawings have few messy

or missing lines, dimensions, or other

drafting features.

3-2

Drawings not detailed/ complex.

There are few features on the

objects. The drawings have some

messy or missing lines, dimensions,

or other drafting features.

0-1

Drawings not detailed/ complex.

There are very few features on the

objects. The drawings have many

missing or missing lines, dimensions,

or other drafting features.

Accuracy

8-10

All drawings contain correct: plane

geometry/ solid geometry, line weight and

line style usage, dimensioning standards, use

of scales, use of title blocks and borders

and are neat with an excellent overall visual

presentation.

5-7

Most drawings contain correct: plane

geometry/ solid geometry, line weight

and line style usage, dimensioning

standards, use of scales, use of title

blocks and borders and are neat with

an average overall visual presentation.

2-4

Some drawings contain correct:

plane geometry/ solid geometry,

line weight and line style usage,

dimensioning standards, use of

scales, use of title blocks and

borders. The visual presentation is

below average.

0-1

Many drawings are missing correct:

plane geometry/ solid geometry,

line weight and line style usage,

dimensioning standards, use of

scales, use of title blocks and

borders. Overall visual presentation

is poor.

Practical Ability/

Construction

10-12

The drawings represent skills that reflect a

thorough knowledge of plane geometry/solid

geometry. Line weights and line styles are

accurate.

9-7

The drawings represent an adequate

knowledge of plane geometry/ solid

geometry. Line weights and line styles

are mostly accurate and neat. Lines are

mostly straight, square, and precise.

4-6

The drawings represent a fair

knowledge of plane geometry /solid

geometry.

Line weights and line styles are

fairly accurate and neat. Lines are

fairly straight, square, and precise.

0-3

The drawings represent little

knowledge of plane geometry / solid

geometry. Line weights and line

styles are not accurate or neat.

Lines are not straight, square, and

precise.

Total Points Scored: _________________/30

* RUBRIC TO BE USED FOR BOTH SECTIONS OF THE PORTFOLIO