technological challenges for the lhc upgrade · lenges at high lumi lhc lhc collimation system...
TRANSCRIPT
Technological Challenges for the LHC Upgrade
Ingrid-Maria Gregor, DESY
LISHEP2011Interna0onalSchoolofHEPRiodeJaneiro,BrazilJuly9,2011
… a detector physicists view ….
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
2
Outline
Lately inside the LHC2 protons 0.000000000000000000001 sec before collision
Apologies for the many interesting topics I didn’t cover!
The LHC (current status)Future Plans OverviewBeam parameters and what they meanBeam IntensityHigher Field MagnetsLuminosity LevelingCrab Cavities
Conclusions
Ingr
id-M
aria
Gre
gor,
DES
Y: T
he E
UD
ET T
eles
cope
- a
t D
ESY
and
CERN
The LHC (current status)
3
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
4
The CERN accelerator complexLEP e+e-(1989-2000) 104 GeV/c per beam
LHC pp and ions7 TeV/c per beam26.8 km length8.3 Tesla superconducting magnets
SwitzerlandLake Geneva
France
LHC accelerator (100m below surface)
SPS accelerator
CMS
ALICE
LHCb
ATLASCERN
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
5
LHC Accelerator Last magnet:April 26th 2007
27 km circumference8500 of 8.4T dipole magnets Cooled to 1.9K with 140 tons of liquid heliumEnergy of one beam = 362 MJ
Kinetic energy of a 747 at take off
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
LHC challenges
The LHC surpasses existing accelerators/colliders in many aspects :The energy of the beam of 7 TeV that is achieved within the size constraints of the existing 26.7 km LEP tunnel.
LHC dipole field 8.3 T HERA/Tevatron ~ 4 T
The luminosity of the collider that will reach unprecedented values for a hadron machine:
LHC pp ~ 1034 cm-2 s-1
Tevatron pp 3x1032 cm-2 s-1
SppS pp 6x1030 cm-2 s-1
Very high field magnets and very high beam intensities:Operating the LHC is a great challenge.There is a significant risk to the equipment and experiments.
A factor 2 in fieldA factor 4 in size
A factor 30 in luminosity
6
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
7based on graph from R.Assmann
Livingston type plot: Energy stored magnets and beam
Potential equipment damage in case of failures during operation.
Beam Power
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
CERN Accelerator Complex
8
Year Top energy[GeV]
Length[m]
Linac
PSB
PS
SPS
LHC
1979 0.05 30
1972 1.4 157
1959 26.0 628
1976 450.0 6911
2008 7000.0 26657
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
LHC Start Up
2008 Accelerator complete Ring cold and under vacuum 10.09: First beams around 19.09: Accident
2008 –2009 14 months of major repairs and consolidation NewQuench Protection System for online monitoring and protection of all inter-magnet joints But: uncertainties about the splice quality (copper stabilizer) Risk of thermal runaway scenarios => decision to limit beam energy to 3.5 TeV for first operation20.11. Restart LHC at 1.18TeV29.11: Both beams accelerated to 1.18 TeV simultaneously -> LHC Highest Energy Accelerator
9
O. Brüning et al.
2010 19.03 Ramp to 3.5 TeVCollisions at 3.5+3.5 TeVLHC Reaches target energy for 2010/2011
2011 22.04: LHC sets world record beam intensityrecord broken almost on daily basismore Tops recorded than Tevatron…..
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Current Status
10https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/LuminosityPublicResults#2011_pp_Collisions
LHC Design
July 2011
Momentum at collision [TeV/c]
7 3.5
Luminosity[cm-2s-1]
1.00E+34 1.26E+33
Number of bunches per beam 2808 1380
Bunch intensity 1.15E+11 1.25E+11
The performance of LHC is excellentWithin a few months the goal for the year 2011 was reached: 1fb-1 !Hopes are up to reach 5 fb-1 in 2011...
Ingr
id-M
aria
Gre
gor,
DES
Y: T
he E
UD
ET T
eles
cope
- a
t D
ESY
and
CERN
Future Plans Overview
11
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Physics reason for an upgrade
12
L. RossiOperation at even higher luminosity has three main purposes:
Perform more accurate measurement on the new particles discovered in the LHCObserve rare processes (predicted or newly discovered) with rates below the current sensitivityExtend the exploration of the energy frontier, extending the discovery reach by probing rare events.
Besides the with to increase the luminosity there are some more technical reason:Radiation damage limit of IR quadrupoles ~400/fb ->~2020 this limit will be reachedHardware and shielding has not really been optimized for very high radiationNecessity to increase the heat removal capacityRestoring cooling capacity in IR5 left and decouple RF from magnets
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
How the luminosity might evolve
Int. Lumi by end of 2020: 220 fb-1
Or (positive assumption to reach L= 2·1034) 300 fb-1
13E. Todesco
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
14
E. Todesco
How the luminosity might evolve
Err
or h
alvi
ng ti
me
(yea
rs)
Even with a terrific machine, at some point the time to accumulate enough statistics to reduce the error bands is getting very high -> an upgrade is needed!
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Future plans for LHC (“Chamonix 2011”)
Run until end of 2012constantly improvements of the beam parameters (i.e. bunch spacing)
Shut down for ~15 month to fully repair all ~10000 joints (non superconducting between SC magnets)
Resolder, install clamps ….Tie in LINAC4 (high intensity)
Shut down in 2018collimation upgrade (dispersion suppressors)preparation for crab cavities & RF cryosystemdetector upgrades
Shut down in ~2021Full luminosity: 5x1034 leveledNew inner triplets based on Nb3SnCrab cavities
15
Ingr
id-M
aria
Gre
gor,
DES
Y: T
he E
UD
ET T
eles
cope
- a
t D
ESY
and
CERN
Understanding the Beam Parameters
16
“So to achieve high luminosity, all one has to do is make high population bunches of low emittance to collide at high frequency at locations where the beam optics provides as low values of the amplitude functions as possible.” PDG 2010, chapter 25
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Beam Parameter Overview
17
Parameter Unit nominal upgrade
Energy [TeV] 77Protons/Bunch [1011] 1.15 1.7Bunch Spacing [ns] 50…2550…25εn (x, y) [μm] 3.75 3.75σz (rms) [cm] 7.557.55Bunch Length (4 σ) [ns] 1.01.0Longitudinal Emittance [eVs] 2.52.5β* at IP1, IP5 [m] 0.55 0.25…0.14Betatron Tunes {64.31, 59.32}{64.31, 59.32}Piwinski parameter: Piwinski parameter: 0.65 1.4…2.5BB Parameter, ξ , per IP 0.003 0.005…0.008Crossing‐angle: θc [μrad] 285 315…509Main RF [MHz] 400400Crab RF [MHz] 400
Peak luminosity w/o crab cavity 1034 cm‐2s‐1 1 3.3…3.8
Peak luminosity with crab cavity 1034 cm‐2s‐1 1.2 5.8…10.3
Pile up events per crossing 19 44…280
?
! =!
"!#
!!
!
L = frevn1n2
4!"x"y n1n2 = nBNB2
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Understanding LHC Luminosity
18
n1 n2
Interaction Regionarea A
with
is the beam envelope at the IP; determined by the magnet arrangement and poweringbeam emittance (the extent occupied by the particles of the beam in space and momentum phase space as it travels)
area A
for a bunched beamluminosity
“head on collision”
Beta function
L =
!!frev
4"
"nbNb
#!
#!Nb
$NR"
"$
!c
!z !x
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Understanding LHC Luminosity
19
Angle at IP to avoid that the bunches collide in other places that the IPCrossing angle reduces luminosity
“Piwinski parameter”
effective cross section Piwinski parameter describes the effect that the crossing angle is affecting the beam dynamicsThe shorter the bunches ( ) the smaller is the effect
B. Holzer
!z
Geometry factor 22
effective cross section
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Understanding Luminosity
20
L =
!!frev
4"
"nbNb
#!
#!Nb
$NR"
"$
Total beam current.
β*
Brightness
Geometry Factor
Number of bunches
Energy
Ingr
id-M
aria
Gre
gor,
DES
Y: T
he E
UD
ET T
eles
cope
- a
t D
ESY
and
CERN
Collimation
21
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
LHC Collimation
Provide passive protection against irregular fast losses and failures.Provide cleaning for slow losses in the super-conducting environment. Manage radiation impact of beam loss.Minimize background in the experiments.
22
LHC has almost 100 collimators and absorbers.
Alignment tolerances < 0.1 mm to ensure that over 99.99% of the protons are intercepted.
The presently installed LHC collimation system provides optimum robustness but its performance is limited to a beam intensity of 40% with respect to nominal.
beam
1.2
http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=139719
At higher energies collimation gets harder!
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Aperture and collimation
Primary6 σ
Secondary8.8 σ
Dump Protection10.5 σ
Tertiary 15 σ
Triplet 18 σ
With collisions the aperture limit of the LHC is in the strong focusing quadrupoles (triplets) that are installed just next to the experiments.
Hierarchy of collimators must be preserved in all phases to avoid quenching super-conducting magnets and for damage protection. β* is presently limited to 3.5 m by aperture and tolerances.
Collimation hierarchyExp.
23
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
LHC Collimation System
Limited in LHC by collimation system to ~ 20% at 3.5TeVUnder certain assumptions on loss rates, imperfectionsInjectors can deliver nominal beams
With experience assume that LHC canMove to tight collimator settingsImprove loss ratesGet the imperfection factor down✦ Should allow to push to higher intensities (to ~40% nominal)
Then need to install something moreCollimators in the cold regions of the machine in 2012Using “missing magnet” space in the dispersion suppressorsRequires moving magnets in LSS3 and LSS7 (24 magnets each)Should allow us to get to nominal intensity at 7TeV
Phase II collimators installed in 2018
24
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
H-LHC change in layout in the IR
Dispersion suppressor Matching section Separation dipoles Final focus
Today: 6x3 m x1.5 T; h=80 mmHL-LHC: 1x4 m x 7 T; Ø=150 mmToday: Two-in-One Ø =56 mm; 4.2K
HL-LHC: Two-in-One Ø70 mm; 1.9 K
Today: Q4 Two-inOne Ø=70 mm, 4.2 K; D2 ↑↑ 9 m x 3.5 T, 4.2 KHL-LHC: Q4 Two-in-One Ø=90 mm, 1.9 K; CRAB CAVITY; D2 ↑↑ 9 m x 5 T; 1.9 K
Today MQX: 4 x 6 m, Ø=70 mm;HL-LHC MQX: 4 x 8 m x; Ø=150 mm
25
CMS
L. Rossi
Ingr
id-M
aria
Gre
gor,
DES
Y: T
he E
UD
ET T
eles
cope
- a
t D
ESY
and
CERN
Higher Field Magnets
26
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Critical technologies: Magnets
27
L. RossiSuper conducting magnets beyond 10 tesla of accelerator qualities.
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Motivation for Nb3Sn
Nb3Sn can be used to increase aperture/gradient and/or increase heat load margin, relative to NbTiNb3Sn allows higher current at higher B-fields
28
Technical challenges:Nb3Sn is difficult material
Requires high temperature coil reaction after winding Materials compatibility (coil parts, insulation) Thermal expansion differentials (more critical for long magnets) Need to prevent degradation under stressProgress in Nb3Sn current density rapidly translated in record field dipolesSince ~2003, the critical current density of Nb3Sn wires has been stable
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
11 T LHC dipole
29
Here cryo-collimators could be accomodated
For HL-LHC the collimation needs to be improved, but no space is availablereplace 8T magnets (rather long) by 11 T magnets will gain space for collimation
11T magnets are under development within HL-LHC (in collaboration with Fermilab)
Ingr
id-M
aria
Gre
gor,
DES
Y: T
he E
UD
ET T
eles
cope
- a
t D
ESY
and
CERN
Beta*
30
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
The need for new quadrupoles
The minimum β* is limited by the aperture of the triplets at the IP and also by the chromatic aberations introduced by the very tight squeezeSmall β*⇒huge β at focusing quad
Need bigger quads to go to smaller β*
31
Existing quads• 70 mm aperture• 200 T/m gradient
Proposed for upgrade• At least 120 mm aperture• 200 T/m gradient• Field 70% higher at pole face
⇒ Also beyond the limit of NbTi -> Nb3Sn
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
High Field Quadrupole (LARP)
32
US-LARP is engaged in the production of a model by 2013 (4...6 m length) for the decision on the technology to be used (Nb3Sn vs. Nb-Ti)120 mm aperture and 200 T/m gradientTesting first 1m long prototype
High Field Quadrupole HQ (120 mm aperture, 1 m long)
Achieved >155 T/m gradient in first test, at 4.5KAlready above NbTi intrinsic limit at 1.9K
First quench >150 T/m in second testSeveral coil failures due to insulation & conductor damageTraced to high compression during coil fabricationNew & more challenging design - requires optimization
The Nb3Sn development plan aims at demonstrating readiness for atechnology decision and construction initiation in 2014
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
SQSM TQS
LR
LQS-4m
HQTQC
33L. Rossi
LARP (US LHC program) Magnets
Ingr
id-M
aria
Gre
gor,
DES
Y: T
he E
UD
ET T
eles
cope
- a
t D
ESY
and
CERN
Luminosity Leveling
34
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Luminosity leveling
35see e.g. J.P.Koutchouk, Cham. 2010)
L ! 1
!!!
1 + !2c"2
z4#!$
Three possibilities in LHC, specific to crossing at an angle (no yet decided):➡ Leveling via dynamic beta* adjustments➡ no additional hardware necessary, but is probably complex to implement but is cheap.➡ Leveling via dynamic bunch length adjustments➡ no or minor side effect if the beam remains stable; needed: reduction of the voltage by 16 +
bunch shortening➡ Leveling via dynamic crossing angle adjustments➡ Leveling via the Xing angle appears to have the best potential (performance, complexity) but
requires unexplored solutions (Crab Crossing) or some interference with detectors (Early Separation).
Integrated Lumi is the same
Ingr
id-M
aria
Gre
gor,
DES
Y: T
he E
UD
ET T
eles
cope
- a
t D
ESY
and
CERN
Crab Cavities
36
Increase peak luminosity with increasing x-angle Increase intensities and smaller emittances beyond head-on beam-beam limit Level luminosity (reduce Pile-up, radiation damage)
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Crab Crossing Restores Bunch Overlap
RF crab cavity deflects head and tail in opposite direction so that collision is effectively “head on” for luminosity and tune shiftThe crab cavity creates two-loop magnetic field (blue) inside to kick bunches sideway.1st proposed in 1988, in operation at KEKB since 2007 → world record luminosity!*
http://www.kek.jp/intra-e/feature/2010/KEKBCrabCavity.html
Example of an crab cavity creating a two-loop magnetic field
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
The challenge: a normal RF cavity requires a transverse dimension > 0.609 λ !For 400 MHz, this means > 460 mm.The LHC beams are separated 194 mm (0.26 λ)!Something very unconventional is needed!
38
Crab Cavities
E. Jenssen
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Parallel bar cavity (ODU) Half wave resonator (SLAC)
Four bar cavity (U Lancaster) Kota cavity (KEK)
39
Ideas for Compact CC’s
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Back-up strategy: Elliptical Crab Cavities
40
Retain a conventional cavity option in the unlikely event of major unforeseen ’show stopper’ with all compacts…Requires significant civil engineering costs due to needed dogleg sections in the IRs Still acceptable, in view of the importance gaining back luminosity from the crossing angle. A straightforward conventional cavity installation in IR 4 as a global scheme would serve as an alternate option in the worst case. Decision point 2015 – stop if Compact CC’s are validated!
Cryostat design exists (from LARP) compatible with P4 (800 MHz)
Ingr
id-M
aria
Gre
gor,
DES
Y: T
he E
UD
ET T
eles
cope
- a
t D
ESY
and
CERN
Brightness
41
!Nb
!N
"
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Brightness
42
LHC imposed brightness must be present from the lowest energy because brightness is (at best) conserved in a cascade of proton accelerators (Liouville’s theorem).Brightness (emittance and beam intensity) is defined in the accelerator chain before injection into the LHC.The emittance can be improved by increasing the injection energy
It was decided to build a new linear accelerator at the beginning of the chain
Increasing the beam intensity by a factor of 2Increase injection energy in the PS from 1.4 to 2 GeV, increasing the field in the PSB magnets and replacing its power supplyHigher energy out of the PS gives smaller transverse emittance and beam sizes => reducing the injections losses into the SPS
Building etc. already existing
https://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=129870
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
43
⇒ Increase injection energy in the PSB from 50 to 160 MeV, Linac4 (160 MeV H-) to replace Linac2 (50 MeV H+)
⇒ Increase injection energy in the PS from 1.4 to 2 GeV, increasing the field in the PSB magnets, replacing power supply and changing transfer equipment
⇒ Upgrade the PSB , PS and SPS to make them capable to accelerate and manipulate a higher brightness beam (feedbacks, cures against electron clouds, hardware modifications to reduce impedance…)
Brightness
To increase reliability and lifetime (until ~2030!) (tightly linked with consolidation) ⇒ Upgrade/replace ageing equipment (power supplies, magnets, RF…)
⇒ Procure spares
⇒ Improve radioprotection measures (shielding, ventilation…)
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
44
Linac4 PS injector, PS and SPS Beam characteristics at LHC injection
2011 - 2012
Continuation of construction…
• Beam studies § simulations• Investigation of RCS option• Hardware prototyping• Design § construction of some
equipment• TDR
25 ns, 1.15 1011p/b, >2.9 mm.mrad50 ns, 1.7 1011p/b, >2.5 mm.mrad75 ns, 1.2 1011 p/b, ≤ 2 mm.mrad
2013 – 2014 (Long Shutdown 1)
• Linac4 beam commissioning
•Connection to PSB ?
• PSB modification (H- injection) ?• PSB beam commissioning ?• Modifications and installation of
prototypes in PS and SPS
2015 - 2017
• Progressive increase of Linac4 beam current
• If Linac4 connected: progressive increase of PSB brightness
• Some improvement of PS beam (Injection still at 1.4 GeV)
• Equipment design § construction for PS injector, PS and SPS
• Beam studies
• Little gain at LHC injection (pending PS and SPS hardware upgrades)
2018(Long Shutdown 2)
• Extensive installations in PS injector, PS and SPS
• Beam commissioning
2019 –2021After ~1 year of operation: beam characteristics for HL-LHC…
Preliminary Planning
Ingr
id-M
aria
Gre
gor,
DES
Y: T
he E
UD
ET T
eles
cope
- a
t D
ESY
and
CERN
HL-LHC Luminosity
45
L =
!!frev
4"
"nbNb
#!
#!Nb
$NR"
"$
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Recap
Total beam current. Limited by:• Uncontrolled beam loss!!• E-cloud and other instabilities• Action: Linac4
Reduce β*, limited by• magnet technology -> Nb3Ti• chromatic effects
Brightness, limited by • Injector chain• Max tune-shift
Geometric factor, related to crossing angle and bunch length
Maximize number of bunches
46
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
47
Booster energy upgrade 1.4 → 2 GeV, ~2014
IR upgrades:detectors, low‐β quad’scrabcavi0es
etc.~2022
Linac4~2014
SPS enhancements2012-2022
F. Zimmermann
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
What can HL-LHC reach ?
Leveled peak luminosity: L = 5 1034 cm-2 sec-1
Virtual peak luminosity: L = 10 1034 cm-2 sec-1
Integrated luminosity: 200 fb-1 to 300 fb-1 per yearTotal integrated luminosity: ca. 3000 fb-1
48
Goal:
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Conclusions
The LHC is running extremely good, the goal for 2011 to collect 1 fb-1 was already reached -> nex goal is 5 fb-1
An even more potent machine is envisaged for 2020+ to access rare decaysR&D for this goal is in full swing, a good understanding of the current machine allows to plan for the future 5*1034 is a possible luminosity for HL-LHC
49
2008 by Lars Ottesen Henriksen
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Acknowledgements and Further Reading
This talk represents the work of an almost countless number of people. I have incorporated significant material from:
The annual Chamonix meetingshttp://tinyurl.com/Chamonix2011
Frank Zimmermann’s many luminosity talks, Talks presented at LARP collaborations and DOE reviews
See http://www.uslarp.org/
50
Accelerator Physics in general:Klaus Wille, “The Physics of Particle Accelerators”, Oxford University Press, 2000CERN Accelerator School:http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/603056/files/CERN-2006-002.pdfFundamentals of Accelerator Physics and Technology: http://uspas.fnal.gov/materials/09UNM/UNMFund.html
HL-LHC Upgrade DetailsBreaching the Phase I Optics Limitations for the HL-LHC, S. Fartoukh
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
51
F. Zimmermann
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
LHC Layout
8 crossing interaction points (IP’s)Accelerator sectors labeled by which points they go between
ie, sector 3-4 goes from point 3 to point 452
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
LHC Experiments
Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS (ATLAS)
A Large Ion Collider Experiment (ALICE) B physics at the LHC (LHCb) 53
!"#$%#&$!!'()*++(,-./012( *3(41551678-( !"
Superconductivity and Particle Accelerators
Cryogenics is complicated and expensive,
so what is the interest of superconductivity?
•! High current density ! compact windings
! high magnetic fields and gradients
•! Larger ampere-turns in a small volume! no need for iron
(but iron is still useful for shielding)
•! Reduced power consumption ! lower power bills
(when cost of refrigeration power is offset) (
Superconductivity opens up new technical possibilities
•! Higher magnetic fields ! increased bending power
! greater energy for a given radius
•! Higher electric fields ! higher accelerating gradients
! greater increase of energy per unit length
•! Higher quadrupole gradients ! more focusing power
! higher luminosity
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Superconductivity and Accelerators
54
Cryogenics is complicated and expensive, so what is the interest of superconductivity?
High current density➡ compact windings➡ high magnetic fields and gradients Larger ampere-turns in a small volume -> no need for iron (but iron is still useful for shielding)Reduced power consumption ➡ lower power bills (when cost of refrigeration power is offset)
Superconductivity opens up new technical possibilities Higher magnetic fields -> increased bending power ➡ greater energy for a given radius Higher electric fields -> higher accelerating gradients ➡ greater increase of energy per unit lengthHigher quadrupole gradients ! more focusing power ➡ higher luminosity A. Ballarino
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Summary of LHC Intensity Limits (7 TeV)
Ideal scenario: no imperfections included!
R. AssmannR. Assman @ Chamonix 2010
Chamonix 2011
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
eCloud Effect
Photoelectrons created in the vacuum pipe are accelerated by passing proton bunches.Slow or reflected secondary electrons survive until the next bunch arrivesDepending on the pipe surface conditions and bunch spacing this may lead to an electron cloud build-upEffects on stability, emittance growth etc. are the consequenceCurrently the LHC is running at 50ns bunch spacing to reduce this effect
56
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Crab Cavities
57
Main Technical questionSpace constraints -> 800 MHz elliptical (simple) versus 400 MHz “exotic”
E. Jenssen
Simulations
!"#$%#&$!!'()*++(,-./012( *3(41551678-( !"#
Jc(4.2 K, 6 T)!2300 A/mm2
Jc(1.9 K, 9 T)!2300 A/mm2
T(K)
B(T)
J(A/mm2)
49:(;(
;9<3&#=(
;9!3:(=(
#LHC Strands
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
58
Operating temperature of superconductors (Niobium titanium)
R. Schmidt
The superconducting state only occurs in a limited domain of temperature, magnetic field and transport current density
Superconducting magnets produce high field with high current density
Lowering the temperature enables better usage of the superconductor, by broadening its working range
!"#$%#&$!!'()*++(,-./012( *3(41551678-( !"#
Jc(4.2 K, 6 T)!2300 A/mm2
Jc(1.9 K, 9 T)!2300 A/mm2
T(K)
B(T)
J(A/mm2)
49:(;(
;9<3&#=(
;9!3:(=(
#LHC Strands
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Hour Glass effect
59
Hour glass effectRelevant when β* is decreased close to the bunch length σz.
Define r = β* / σz . Luminosity gets reduced. For round beams the factor is
Ingr
id-M
aria
Gre
gor,
DES
Y: T
he E
UD
ET T
eles
cope
- a
t D
ESY
and
CERN
Beam Beam Effects
60
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Two crossing beams see the field of each otherSpace charge cancellation not present anymoreImportant limitation for high luminosityBeam beam effects: considered to be a major challenge to reach LHC luminosity
61
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Beam-beam interaction
32
- black witness bunches (zero collisions); - red bunches colliding in IP 1 5 and 2 (3 collisions); - blue bunches colliding in IP 1 5 and 8 (3 collisions); - green bunches colliding in IP 2 and 8 (2 collisions).
Effects of the beam-beam force are visible on the lifetime of the various bunches.
o Also sensitive to tune working point.o This will become even more complicated with trains of bunches.
Beams in collision Beams in collisionBeam1 Beam2Intensityloss (%)
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
63
Total crossing angle of 300 µradBeam size at IP 16 µm, in arcs about 1 mBeams in the arcs in two vacuum chambers
Crossing angle for multibunch operation
1232 dipole magnets.
B field 8.3 T (11.8 kA) @ 1.9 K (super-fluid Helium)
2 magnets-in-one design : two beam tubes with an opening of 56 mm.
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
LHC dipole magnet
7
Operating challenges:o Dynamic field changes at injection.o Very low quench levels (~ mJ/cm3)
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
65
1232 main dipoles +3700 multipole corrector magnets
392 main quadrupoles +2500 corrector magnets
Regular arc:Magnets
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
Beam dump
Extraction kickers
Dilution kickers
Extraction septum magnets
Dump block
Complex beam dumping system commissioned.Beam swept over dump surface (power load)
100In
grid
-Mar
ia G
rego
r, D
ESY
- Ch
alle
nges
at
Hig
h Lu
mi L
HC
CERN Accelerators
[fromWikipedia]
“CERN operates a network of six accelerators and a decelerator. Each machine in the chain increases the energy of particle beams before delivering them to experiments or to the next more powerful accelerator… All these accelerators are used to prepare the beam needed by the Large Hadron Collider
Two linear accelerators generate low energy particles. Linac2 accelerates protons to 50MeV for injection in to the Proton Synchrotron Booster (PSB), and Linac3 provides heavy ions at 4.2MeVu fori injection into the Low Energy Ion Ring (LEIR). The Proton Synchrotron Booster increases the energy of particles generated by the proton linear accelerator before they are transferred to the other accelerators.The Low Energy Ion Ring (LEIR) accelerates the ions from the ion linear accelerator, before transferring them to the Proton Synchrotron (PS). This accelerator was commissioned in 2005, after having been reconfigured from the previous Low Energy Antiproton Ring (LEAR). The 28GeV Proton Synchrotron (PS), built in 1959 and still operating as a feeder to the more powerful SPS. The Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS), a circular accelerator with a diameter of 2 kilometres built in a tunnel, which started operation in 1976. It was designed to deliver an energy of 300GeV and was gradually upgraded to 450GeV. As well as having its own beamlines for fixed-target experiments (currently COMPASS and NA62),it has been operated as a proton–antiproton collider (the SppS collider), and for accelerating high energy electrons and positrons which were injected into the Large Electron Positron Collider (LEP). Since2008, it has been used to inject protons and heavy ions into the Large Hadron Collider LHC).
67