technology-facilitated feedback processes

26
Technology-facilitated feedback processes David Carless CITERS conference May 29, HKU 2015 The University of Hong Kong

Upload: david-carless

Post on 11-Aug-2015

163 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Technology-facilitated feedback processes

David Carless

CITERS conference

May 29, HKU 2015

The University of Hong Kong

Overview

1. Framing feedback

2. Technology-enhanced feedback strategies

3. Evidence from case studies

4. Implications

The University of Hong Kong

What does ‘feedback’ mean?

As dialogues about student work

The University of Hong Kong

As comments …

Providing information about performance

AND/OR

The University of Hong Kong

 

 

Old paradigm New paradigm

Feedback as monologic information transfer 

Feedback as dialogic interaction 

Conventional feedback 

Sustainable feedback 

Key aim of feedback

To enhance student ability to self-monitor their work in progress

The University of Hong Kong

Bigger pictureFeedback as assessment design issue

Feedback as a pedagogical issue

Feedback as a relational issue

The University of Hong Kong

Feedback as dialogue

1. Teacher-led dialogic feedback

2. Peer feedback and internal feedback

3. Technology-facilitated dialogic feedback

The University of Hong Kong

TECHNOLOGY

ENHANCED FEEDBACK

STRATEGIES

The University of Hong Kong

Two common strategies

Learning Management Systems

Use of clickers, EVS

The University of Hong Kong

Audio feedback

Providing recorded verbal commentary (instead of written feedback?)

The University of Hong Kong

Audio feedback: pros

• Viewed positively by students (Lunt & Curran, 2010)

• Permits nuanced feedback or detail (Savin-Baden, 2010)

• Enhances staff-student relationships (Knauf, 2015)

The University of Hong Kong

Audio feedback: cons

• ‘Moderate’ impact on student learning (Gould & Day, 2013)

• Should not replace face-to-face interaction (Lunt & Curran, 2010)

• Workload? (Hennessy & Forester, 2014)

The University of Hong Kong

Adaptive release

Tutors release feedback but no grade until students write reflective account

Promotes engagement with feedback but ‘Enforced reflection’ (Parkin et al., 2012).

The University of Hong Kong

EVIDENCE FROM THE CASE

STUDIES

The University of Hong Kong

Use of Facebook

History case:

Students uploaded drafts of work in progress & received peer feedback

The University of Hong Kong

Assessed blog

Business case: participation grade (30-40%) including class & blog contribution

“Having a grading allocation … gives some life to the blog” (Carless, 2015, p. 124)

Integrate blog or LMS discussion with classroom teaching

The University of Hong Kong

Non-assessed blog

Real Estate and Construction

“Students will treasure feedback if it addresses their needs and interests”

(Carless, 2015, p. 205)

The University of Hong Kong

Implications

The University of Hong Kong

Key role of feedback

Enhancing students’ abilities to fine-tune their self-evaluative capacities

The University of Hong Kong

Peer feedback

Students often gain more from providing than receiving peer feedback (Nicol et al., 2014)

The University of Hong Kong

Sustainable feedback

Enhancing student role to generate & use feedback (Carless et al., 2011; Hounsell, 2007)

The University of Hong Kong

Closing feedback loops

It’s only feedback if students take some action

The University of Hong Kong

THANK YOU

The University of Hong Kong

My definition of feedback

“A dialogic process in which learners make sense of information from varied sources and use it to enhance the quality of their work or learning strategies”.

Carless (2015, p.192) building on Boud & Molloy (2013)

The University of Hong Kong

Handling critique

Self-management skills, maintaining emotional equilibrium

The University of Hong Kong