testing and implementation of amd mitigation, alum gulch-flux canyon, cox gulch-3r canyon and lead...

42
Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine Dan Eyde – St Cloud Mining Barbara Carroll - GeoGRAFX February 24 - 25, 2015, Vancouver, Canada

Upload: daniel-eyde

Post on 07-Aug-2015

69 views

Category:

Science


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon,

Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen MineDan Eyde – St Cloud Mining

Barbara Carroll - GeoGRAFX

February 24 - 25, 2015, Vancouver, Canada

Page 2: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Watershed area mitigation of AMD and selected heavy metals:

◦Raise pH of drainage waters◦Reduce zinc, cadmium, lead, and

copper in Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine, SE Arizona utilizing gabion retaining wall and footer structures combined with zeolite material adsorption

Project Description

Page 3: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Legacy mining activity at the top of the watershed produces acid mine drainage which is incorporated in groundwater & surface water discharges (tailings, tunneling, wall rock)

Reasons For This Project

Page 4: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

The chemistry of the bedrock causes high background AMD as a result of normal erosional processes

Reasons For This Project

Page 5: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Several large removal actions and expensive mine portal closures implemented in the area have had little effect on heavy metals and AMD -impacted loading characteristics of several tributaries flowing into Sonoita Creek and Patagonia Lake.

Reasons For This Project

Page 6: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Location

Page 7: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Project Location

Page 8: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2014, 9:36 p.m. 

TUCSON — A popular tourist attraction in southern Arizona is at risk of being contaminated with orange and brown sludge that spilled from two abandoned mines near the town of Patagonia.

The Trench Camp and Lead Queen mines overflowed late last month because of heavy rainfall caused by Hurricane Odile.

The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality has issued a notice of violation to an Asarco trust that owns the Trench Camp Mine.

“We've talked to our consultants, and we're gonna do what the state requires us to do,” Jay Steinberg, who runs the trust, said Wednesday.

A resident near Patagonia noticed the sludge at the end of September, first at the Lead Queen Mine and later at the Trench Camp one, said Wendy Russell, coordinator for the Patagonia Area Resource Alliance. Both waterways lead to Sonoita Creek, which runs off into Patagonia Lake, the site of the state park.

“This is an ongoing hazard to our community's water supply,” Russell said, adding that Patagonia Lake State Park is a tourist attraction. “Folks fish and swim there.”

Initial tests showed the water had unsafe levels of pH, but more will be conducted.

The Lead Queen Mine ended operations in the 1940s. Trench Camp closed in the 1960s.

Since then, Arizona has taken Asarco to court to get the company to invest in cleanup efforts at its shuttered mines across the state. The parties settled in 2009, and $2.85 million was allocated to cleaning up Trench Camp and another mine.

Russell said not enough has been done to ensure the sites are free of any toxic materials that could leak into the area's water supply.

“There's been minimal efforts to clean them up, and we just witnessed what happens when they don't get cleaned up properly,” she said.

Other parts of the southern part of the state have been affected by the hurricane that damaged the Baja California peninsula.

Suprise! Article in Pittsburg Tribune

Page 9: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Lead Queen Site

Page 10: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

ADEQ Impairment Map

Page 11: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Combined Metals Distribution

Page 12: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Geologic Map

Page 13: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Geologic Influences on Water and Soil and Overall Watershed Ecology

Page 14: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Humboldt

0.100

1.000

10.000

100.000

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00

pH

Co

mb

Me

tals

(p

pm

)

Trench Camp

0.100

1.000

10.000

100.000

1000.000

2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00

pH

Com

b M

etal

s (p

pm)

Worlds Fair

0.010

0.100

1.000

10.000

100.000

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00

pH

Co

mb

Met

als

(pp

m)

Page 15: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Trench Camp Remediated Tailings

Page 16: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Average chemical composition of mine tailings in the Harshaw Creek Watershed (measured in ppm). From Dean (1982, p.46)

TRENCH MINE TAILINGS

pH 2.6SO4 41,076Fe 6,050Cu 43Mn 4,621Zn 838As 466Pb 3,972Cd 20Cr 16Se 0Hg 5.4Ag 25Al 528, 725

Water Chemistry

Page 17: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Storm-related Surface water from Trench Mine Tailings (mg/L)

Page 18: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

GEOLOGIC STRUCTURESWATERSHED POSITION

Faults and sympatheticfractures influencemovement of water through the systemin shallow and deepgroundwater

Upper Alum Trench Camp

Page 19: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Remediation of Adit discharge:Abiding by the Law

6/17/05

Trench Camp Wetlands

Page 20: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Load estimates calculated during base-flow conditions at Trench Camp indicate that the discharge produces approximately 20 lbs of combined metals Cd+Co+Cu+Ni+Pb+Zn)

per month; the World’s Fair segment produces approximately 86 lbs of combined metals (Cd+Co+Cu+Ni+Pb+Zn) per month.

Perennial Evaporative Salt Accumulation

Page 21: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Salt Fields-Load Transfer(from spring or seep to

stream reach)

Page 22: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Project Location

Page 23: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Site 1 – Upper Alum Gulch

Page 24: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Site 2 – Alum, Below World Fair Mine

Page 25: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Site 3 – 3R Canyon

Page 26: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Site 4 – Cox Gulch, 3-R Canyon

Page 27: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Site 5A – Upper Lead Queen

Lower PortalOutlet

Upper adits, shaftsAnd drifts Lower Portal

Outlet

Junction of Fe-rich water withNeutral high pH stream—initial drop-Out area of ochre precipitate

Upper adits, shaftsAnd drifts

Page 28: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Site 5B - Lower Lead Queen- Fracture discharge area

Parking area

South TibutaryWith waste rock and Mine workings.

Gabion-pad array

Page 29: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Consortium partners, by direct in-stream treatment methods, will reduce the heavy metals loading of zinc, cadmium, lead, and copper and raise the pH of several AMD -impacted tributaries flowing into Sonoita Creek and Patagonia Lake.

Desired Outcomes

Page 30: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

1. Water quality data, including aqueous invertebrate inventories/analysis will be compiled and a series of WQ samples along with an invertebrate inventory will be taken to characterize the current base flow water quality conditions prior to emplacement of in-stream structures; geochemistry testing and monitoring will continue throughout the life of the project.

MethodsProject implementation will be carried out as follows:

Page 31: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

2. Model simulations of surface flow will be conducted, and weather stations and Continuous Slope Area gages will be installed to assist in establishing local precipitation and flow response values. Peak flow values, precipitation and stream response will be recorded during monsoon, and will be integrated into the models to determine parameters for gabion wall construction.

Methods

Page 32: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

3. Laboratory column tests will be conducted to measure transport parameters describing the migration of contaminants and acid mine drainage through Zeolite test media.

Methods

Page 33: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

4. A series of gabion retainer wall structures and stream-bed footers with integrated zeolite materials will be installed in favorable areas downstream of perennial spring discharge points which are the sources of loading in the streams.

Methods

Page 34: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Gabion Structures

Page 35: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

5. Continue monitoring water quality inflow and outflow, soil chemistry and aqueous invertebrate community health upstream and downstream of the implementation for overall effectiveness and continuity.

Methods

Page 36: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Natural zeolites are hydrated aluminosilicates.

Zeolites are used commercially for several reasons:

* Unique absorption* Ion exchange* Molecular sieve* Catalytic abilities

What Is Zeolite

Page 37: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Natural zeolites are readily available. The resources are large, well tested and consistent in performance.

There are a number of available technologies that improve sorbent selectivity or increase capacity for specific contaminants.

Technology is proven in municipal and drinking water, nuclear, and industrial water treatment applications and is becoming more common in polishing mine effluents prior to discharge.

Natural Zeolite-based Media Systems

Page 38: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Parameter Raw Water After Zeolite

Sample 1 3.31 5.71

     

Sample 2 2.97 5.32

     

Sample 3 2.52 4.00

     

Test Results pH

Page 39: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

0 5 10 15 20 25

Dosage (g adsorbent/L metal solution)

Perc

en

t A

dsorb

ed

(%

)

Co Cs Cu Sr Zn

Cs >Sr>Cu>Zn~Co

Sr

Co

Percent Cation Removal Obtained With Zeolite

Page 40: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Zeolite ProjectsProject Contaminant

Three Mile Island Cesium, Strontium

Kendall Gold Mine – Hilger, MT  Thallium, Cu, Pb, Zn, Co

Homestake Legacy Site - Farmington, NM

Uranium

Colorado Tailings, Butte, MT Cu, Pb, Zn, AZ

Greenbriar Coal – West Virgina AMD, Mn, Al - Pilot

Rimcon – Wyoming  Mitigation High Sodic waters

WRT – 130 Commercial installations

Arsenic, Radium, Thorium, Uranium

Fukushima, Japan – Kurion Cesium, Strontium, Americium, Calcium

Page 41: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

Erosion Control and Rock Barrier BMPs are expected to last 5-10 years depending on the rate of storm run-off. Zeolite material replacement frequency will be determined as part of implementation of the project.

Long-Term Maintenance

Page 42: Testing and Implementation of AMD Mitigation, Alum Gulch-Flux Canyon, Cox Gulch-3R Canyon and Lead Queen Mine

QuestionsDan Eyde – CTO & PresidentSt Cloud Mining1955 W Grant Rd. Suite 200Tucson, AZ [email protected] or [email protected]