the field guide to eportfolio: a panel of authors guide to... · the field guide to eportfolio: a...
TRANSCRIPT
The Field Guide to ePortfolio: A Panel of Authors
Andrew HarverProfessor, UNC Charlotte
Gail Matthews-DeNataleAssociate Director, Center for Advancing Teaching and Learning through Research, Northeastern University
Joan Monahan WatsonDirector of Education, Digication, Inc.
Tracy Penny LightAssociate Professor, Thompson Rivers University
Gail RingDirector of Learning Partnerships, PebblePad North America
Association of American Colleges & Universities 2018 Annual Meeting9th Annual Forum on Digital Learning and ePortfolios
Saturday, January 27, 2018
Field Guide to EportfolioA Collaborative of the Association for Authentic, Experiential and Evidence-Based Learning (AAEEBL);
the Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U);the International Journal of ePortfolio (IJeP); and
Electronic Portfolio Action and Communication (EPAC) Community of Practice
Executive CommitteeTrent Batson
Association for Authentic, Experiential and Evidence-Based LearningTerrel L. Rhodes
Association of American Colleges and UniversitiesC. Edward Watson
International Journal of ePortfolioAssociation of American Colleges and Universities
Helen L. ChenElectronic Portfolio Action and Communication Community of Practice
Executive EditorKathryn S. Coleman
University of MelbourneCoeditor
Andrew HarverUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8t_OY4denF1c0NLM3VoNUFhaU0/view
Chapter 2. Redesigning Learning: Eportfolios in Support of Reflective Growth
within Individuals and OrganizationsGail Matthews-DeNatale
Samantha J. Blevins-BohananVirginia Tech
Constance G. RothwellUNC Charlotte
Catherine M. WehlburgTexas Christian University
Levels of Design Questions: Course, Program, Institution, & Beyond
Design Decisions
• Portfolio type• Flexibility of structure• Required elements• Choice of artifacts• Reflection prompts• Assessment strategy
Integration Plan
• Course and/or program placement
• Student and faculty orientation
• Ongoing support• Assessment processes
OutcomesStudents• Academic, social, work
experience integration• Self-awareness & self-
direction• Improved
communication ability
Programs• Evidence-based
learning & teaching• Curricular integrity• Program improvement
& accreditation
Purpose & Goals• Value for students• Curriculum goals• Assessment goals• Opportunities and
constraints
(Poklop, 2010)
Levels of Design Questions: Course, Program, Institution, & Beyond
Design Decisions
• Portfolio type• Flexibility of structure• Required elements• Choice of artifacts• Reflection prompts• Assessment strategy
Integration Plan
• Course and/or program placement
• Student and faculty orientation
• Ongoing support• Assessment processes
OutcomesStudents• Academic, social, work
experience integration• Self-awareness & self-
direction• Improved
communication ability
Programs• Evidence-based
learning & teaching• Curricular integrity• Program improvement
& accreditation
Purpose & Goals• Value for students• Curriculum goals• Assessment goals• Opportunities and
constraints
What do we hope to gain?
What difference might eportfoliosmake in the growth of students, faculty,
and our institution?
(Poklop, 2010)
Community-sourced, Peer-reviewed, Global, and Digital
• Logistical: Where will work-in-progress live? How will the group meet? Will there be online companion materials? If so, where will those materials live?
• Interpersonal: What is the system for accountability? How does the group understand the boundaries and fluidity of leadership?
• Authorial: How will the editing be handled? Who will revise to attain integrity of tone and voice, and what are the parameters for unilateral revision? When peer-review recommendations are received, how will those be negotiated and implemented?
• Credit: Who goes first? What if there are differing disciplinary conventions for credit? (e.g., leadership vs. alphabetical order)?
Samantha Streamer Veneruso, Professor of English, Chair of General Studies, Montgomery College
Elizabeth Black, Blended Learning Projects Coordinator, Office of the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic), Western Sydney University
Caryn Chaden, Associate Provost for Student Success and Accreditation, DePaul University
Geoffrey Habron, Director of Electronic Portfolio, Warren Wilson College
Kristyn Muller, Assistant Director of Residential Life, University at Albany, SUNY
Benjamin R. Stephens, Professor, Department of Psychology, Clemson University
Joan Monahan Watson, Director of Education, Digication, Inc.
Kathleen Blake Yancey, Kellogg Hunt Professor and Distinguished Research Professor, Department of English, Florida State University
Chapter 4. Promoting Student Cognitive Development: Integrative Learning, Reflection, and Metacognition
Key Concepts from Chapter 4 ePortfolios support the interdependent processes of
• Integration: practice of forging and organizing connections among and between previous knowledge, lived experiences, and new information (Huber & Hutchings, 2004)
• Reflection: an intentional awareness of the role that different experiences play in the learning equation• Metacognition: contributes to the development of self-regulation skills, whereby students recognize and use
effective learning techniques and behaviors including identifying and assessing their learning strategies, monitoring their learning, and actively engaging in their learning experiences
ePortfolios include and transcend boundaries, functioning as a space for experiential synthesis
• didactic (academic/curricular) • co-curricular / extracurricular • personal • professional
To “collect and select” is not enough; the explanation of the symbolic representation of the artifacts is how/when/where learning is revealed
Reflections on Organic ChemistryElena Fulton, University of Puget Sound
This [30-page lab report] may seem like a painstaking project to complete, however I came away from this with a better understanding of how far I am able to push myself as a student. I was uncomfortable in many ways throughout the semester, but I grew in my ability to ask for help, to be proactive in planning and learning, and most of all I grew in my confidence as an independent thinker, and I have taken that with me in every class I have been in since leaving organic chemistry.
https://pugetsound.digication.com/elena-fulton-student-portfolio/organic-chemistry
Pearls from the Collaboration• Find a good leader! Someone who has
• Good communication and organization skills• Patience• Sufficient time to commit to the project
• Disciplinary: Bring your own knowledge and experience to the table• Consider the ways that your students’ reflections illustrate deeper learning• Examples of student work and shared pedagogical models are exceptionally
valuable• Interdisciplinary: Bring an open mind to the process
• Be willing to learn from others’ experiences• Be willing to consider new/unfamiliar types of research methodologies
Chapter 6. On the Right Track: Using Eportfolios to Address Institutional Challenges
Tracy Penny Light, Associate Professor (History), Department of Philosophy, History, and Politics,
Thompson Rivers UniversityKatherine Lithgow, Senior Instructional
Developer, Integrative Learning, Centre for Teaching Excellence, University of Waterloo
David Hubert, Professor and Assistant Provost of Learning Advancement,
Salt Lake Community CollegeShane Sutherland, Development Director,
PebblePad
Key Concepts from Chapter
• Documenting learning across contexts can illuminate the diverse needs/goals of 21st century learners so institutions can be more responsive
• Authentic evidence of learning provides institutions opportunities to demonstrate their success to diverse audiences in terms of:
• Accreditation• HIPs• Integrative Learning > Bridging Curricular/Co-curricular Learning
• Portfolios can provide opportunities for institutions to intentionally align their priorities and make that alignment visible
Pearls from Our Collaboration
• Opportunity to explore the topic from different perspectives (faculty, staff, senior admin, portfolio provider)
• Collaborative writing models the kind of work needed on campuses (bridging stakeholder needs rather than working in silos)
• Joint problem-solving and experience-sharing helpful to each of us in our respective roles and institutions
Chapter 10. Faculty ePortfolios: Teaching & Learning and Professional Development
Heather Caldwell, University of Alaska AnchorageGina Rae Foster, John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Gail L. Ring, PebblePad
The Value of Faculty ePortfolios• Provides a bridge between the Institutional needs for assessment and
individual and peer needs for enhancing and documenting personal achievements
• Provides a mechanism for enhancing professional growth and development
• Facilitates a shared “culture of learning and reflection” with our students• Provides a fully faculty owned learning space• Provides a space for innovation and experimentation
Success and Sustainability Depends on…
• A well-defined purpose • Support from administration• Clear value for faculty i.e. re-envisioning the traditional
reward structure• Multiple opportunities for peer collaboration and
feedback• A culture of continuous learning and enrichment
What We Learned• Our chapter became a space for learning that transcended time and
place – we hope the Field Guide expands on this idea and continues to evolve and grow.
• Discovering the lack of research on faculty ePortfolios heightened our urgency to identify what is currently known and to outline questions that seem ripe for investigation.
https://aaeebl.org/2018/02/05/field-guide-to-eportfolio/