the four components what’s wrong? (quantitative data) why? (focus group student data) revised...

36

Upload: alvin-newton

Post on 11-Jan-2016

227 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess
Page 2: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Achieving the Dreamat

Tulsa Community College

Page 3: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Entering Freshman

Page 4: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

What Happens?

Page 5: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

The Four ComponentsWhat’s Wrong?(Quantitative Data)

Why?(Focus Group Student

Data)

Revised InterventionsNew Interventions

Policy Changes Assess Impact

Page 6: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Academic Preparation

60% reported ACT scores; average ACT composite score = 19.6

77% were tested for remedial needs

18% enrolled in developmental English/writing

29% enrolled in developmental reading

67% enrolled in developmental math

Page 7: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

30%

40%

17%

13%

Developmental Placement (based on entry-level assessment)

591 788 329 263

Page 8: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Graduation Rate by Number of Developmental Areas

Required

591 789 329 263

Page 9: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Graduation RateBy Writing Placement

1628 126 218

Page 10: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Graduation Rateby Reading Placement

1404 263 305

Page 11: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Graduation RateBy Math Placement

648 48 143 1133

Page 12: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Persist or Graduate

1972 1485 989 968 781 717

Page 13: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Persist or Graduate by Gender

Fall 2004

Spring ..

.

Fall 2005

Spring ..

.

Fall 2006

Spring ..

.0

20

40

60

80

100100%

78%

53% 52%42% 39%

71%

46% 45%36% 33%

Male (N=800)Female (N=1172)

Per

sist

ence

Rat

e

Page 14: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Persist or Graduate by Ethnicity

*The one Native Hawaiian was removed from the dataset

Page 15: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

The Four ComponentsWhat’s Wrong?(Quantitative Data)

Goals

• Persistence (Year 2 – 4 )

• Developmental Reading (Year 3 – 4 )

• Developmental Math (Year 4 )

Why?(Focus Group Student

Data)

Revised InterventionsNew Interventions

Policy Changes Assess Impact

Page 16: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Why?

Page 17: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

The Four ComponentsWhat’s Wrong?(Quantitative Data)

Goals

• Persistence (Year 2 – 4 )

• Developmental Reading (Year 3 – 4 )

• Developmental Math (Year 4 )

Why?(Focus Group Student

Data)

Revised InterventionsNew Interventions

Policy Changes Assess Impact

Page 18: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Student Focus Groups Three focus groups per campus

12 total groups

101 total students

Students volunteered and were accepted if they had completed their first semester in fall 2007 and had re-enrolled in spring 2008.

Page 19: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Student Focus Groups 4% African American males in both AtD

cohort and focus groups 44% Tulsa Achieves students Mean average age was

• 22.7 years for focus groups (more 18 year olds with Tulsa Achieves)

• 24.5 years for AtD cohort Mean average age of non-Tulsa Achieves

students was 25.8 years.

Page 20: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Most Frequent Barriers/Challenges

Adjusting to college Balancing school and life Textbook issues Tulsa Achieves implementation issues Communication issues with instructors Choosing courses

All six barriers/challenges were identified on all four campuses.

Page 21: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Specific Findings: Clusters

Adjustment Barriers

Service Barriers

Academic Barriers

82% of all barriers/challenges fell into one of three clusters.

Page 22: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Academic BarriersInstructional Issues

• Communication issues with instructors

• Instructional quality

• Understanding instructor’s course requirements

Student Issues

• Choosing courses • Meeting academic workload • Using Blackboard and MyTCC

email

• Academically underprepared

• Lacking computer proficiency

• Course placement

Page 23: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Service Barriers Textbook issues Poor customer service Financial Aid service Confusing enrollment process Limited times and locations of classes Finding locations on campus

Page 24: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Adjustment Barriers Adjusting to college life

Balancing school and life

Time management

Lack of motivation

Page 25: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

The Four ComponentsWhat’s Wrong?(Quantitative Data)

Goals

• Persistence (Year 2 – 4 )

• Developmental Reading (Year 3 – 4 )

• Developmental Math (Year 4 )

Why?(Focus Group Student

Data)

TopPersistence Barriers:

1. Adjusting to college

2. Balancing school and life

3. Textbook issues

4. Tulsa Achieves implementation issues

5. Communication issues with instructors

6. Choosing courses

Revised InterventionsNew Interventions

Policy Changes Assess Impact

Questions

• How do we revise current interventions to directly addresscommon barriers?

• What newinterventions canbe implemented toaddress commonbarriers?

Page 26: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

AtD Organizational Structure at TCC

Page 27: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

1. Orientation◦ Fall 2008: Strategies for Academic Success◦ Expand orientation to all students

Multiple delivery optionsOptions for testing out

2. Advising◦ Compiling current interventions◦ Collaborating with student services and

registration

3. Tulsa Achieves Implementation

Component 3: Revised Interventions/New Interventions

Page 28: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Time Management

MotivationCommunication with Instructors

Meeting Academic Workload

Strategies for Academic Success

Teaching Styles

Persistence Barriers

AdjustmentAcademicBalancing School

& Life

Understanding Instructor’s Course

Adjusting to College

Page 29: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

The Four ComponentsWhat’s Wrong?(Quantitative Data)

Goals

• Persistence (Year 2 – 4 )

• Developmental Reading (Year 3 – 4 )

• Developmental Math (Year 4 )

Why?(Focus Group Student

Data)

TopPersistence Barriers:

1. Adjusting to college

2. Balancing school and life

3. Textbook issues

4. Tulsa Achieves implementation issues

5. Communication issues with instructors

6. Choosing courses

Revised InterventionsNew Interventions

Policy Changes Assess Impact

Questions

• How do we revise current interventions to directly addresscommon barriers?

• What newinterventions canbe implemented toaddress commonbarriers?

• What policy changes

need to be made to address common barriers?

Page 30: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

TCC State Policy Change Requests

Ensure dual credit for dual enrollment - Seniors, at least, should be able to take college classes rather than high school elective classes for dual credit.

Align Oklahoma's K-12 test outcomes with national standards

Allow Oklahoma community colleges to offer teacher education in math and science, to reduce the number of unqualified, or marginally qualified, math and science teachers in Oklahoma classrooms

Page 31: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

TCC State Policy Change Requests Rescind required $13 per credit hour fee

on all developmental courses

Provide timely statewide reports tracking student transfer

Page 32: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

The Four ComponentsWhat’s Wrong?(Quantitative Data)

Goals

• Persistence (Year 2 – 4 )

• Developmental Reading (Year 3 – 4 )

• Developmental Math (Year 4 )

Why?(Focus Group Student

Data)

TopPersistence Barriers:

1. Adjusting to college

2. Balancing school and life

3. Textbook issues

4. Tulsa Achieves implementation issues

5. Communication issues with instructors

6. Choosing courses

Revised InterventionsNew Interventions

Policy Changes

Questions

• How do we revise current interventions to directly addresscommon barriers?

• What newinterventions canbe implemented toaddress commonbarriers?

• What policy changes need to be made to address common barriers?

Assess Impact

Assessments

Formative:• To what extent did interventions(or policy changes)effectively addresscommon barriers?

Summative:• To what extent did interventionsincrease persistence?

Page 33: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

The Four ComponentsWhat’s Wrong?(Quantitative Data)

Goals

• Persistence (Year 2 – 4 )

• Developmental Reading (Year 3 – 4 )

• Developmental Math (Year 4 )

Why?(Focus Group Student

Data)

TopPersistence Barriers:

1. Adjusting to college

2. Balancing school and life

3. Textbook issues

4. Tulsa Achieves implementation issues

5. Communication issues with instructors

6. Choosing courses

Revised InterventionsNew Interventions

Policy Changes

Questions

• How do we revise current interventions to directly addresscommon barriers?

• What newinterventions canbe implemented toaddress commonbarriers?

• What policy changes need to be made to address common barriers?

Assess Impact

Assessments

Formative:• To what extent did interventions(or policy changes)effectively addresscommon barriers?

Summative:• To what extent did interventionsincrease persistence?

Page 34: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Research AtD.org and other sites for interventions that work for community colleges

Complete a list of TCC existing interventions Identify specific advising components that

address student identified barriers Develop assessment protocols Identify systemic and standard methods of

collaboration and communication

AtD Planning: Summer to Fall

Page 35: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess

Next StepsTCC’s goal is to achieve a 3% increase in

student persistence each year.

Page 36: The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess