the icsid caseload
TRANSCRIPT
THE ICSID CASELOAD –
STATISTICS
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 2
The ICSID Caseload – Statistics
(Issue 2011-1)
This new issue of the ICSID Caseload – Statistics provides an updated profile of the ICSID caseload, historically and for 2010. It is based on cases registered or administered by ICSID as of December 31, 2010.
As in previous issues, this document examines: the number of cases registered under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules; the number of other cases administered by the ICSID Secretariat; the basis of consent to ICSID jurisdiction invoked in registered arbitration and conciliation cases; the geographic distribution of ICSID cases by the State party to the dispute; the economic sectors involved in ICSID disputes; the outcomes in ICSID arbitration and conciliation proceedings (now including further information on disputes decided by arbitral tribunals); and the nationality and geographic origins of arbitrators, conciliators and ad hoc committee members appointed in ICSID proceedings. This issue also reviews outcomes in annulment proceedings under the ICSID Convention.
The Secretariat will continue to publish the ICSID Caseload – Statistics on a bi-annual basis, and welcomes any comments or suggestions by email at [email protected].
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS1
PART I
- ALL CASES REGISTERED AND ADMINISTERED BY ICSID
1. Map of the ICSID Contracting States and Other Signatories to the ICSID Convention as of December 31, 2010 6
2. Cases Registered by ICSID 7 Chart 1: Total Number of ICSID Cases Registered by Year 7 Chart 2: Number of Cases Registered by Year under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules 8 Chart 3: Type of Cases Registered under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules 8
3. Non-ICSID Cases Administered by the ICSID Secretariat 9 Chart 4: Number of Non-ICSID Cases Administered by the ICSID Secretariat over the Past Fiscal Years2 9
4. Basis of Consent Invoked to Establish ICSID Jurisdiction in Registered ICSID Cases 10 Chart 5: Basis of Consent Invoked to Establish ICSID Jurisdiction in Registered ICSID Cases 10
5. Geographic Distribution of All ICSID Cases by State Party Involved 11 Chart 6: Geographic Distribution of All ICSID Cases by State Party Involved 11
6. Distribution of All ICSID Cases by Economic Sector 12 Chart 7: Distribution of All ICSID Cases by Economic Sector 12
7. ICSID Arbitration and Conciliation Proceedings – Outcomes 13 Chart 8: Arbitration Proceedings under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules – Outcomes 13 Chart 9: Disputes Decided by Arbitral Tribunals under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules – Outcomes 13 Chart 10: Conciliation Proceedings under the ICSID Convention – Outcomes 14 Chart 11: Conciliation Proceedings under the ICSID Convention – Commission Reports 14
8. Annulment Proceedings under the ICSID Convention – Outcomes 15 Chart 12: Awards rendered and Outcomes in Annulment Proceedings under the ICSID Convention by Decade 15
9. Arbitrators, Conciliators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases 16 Chart 13: Arbitrators, Conciliators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases – Distribution of Appointments by Geographic Region 16 Chart 14: Arbitrators, Conciliators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases – Distribution of Appointments by ICSID and by the Parties (or Party-appointed Arbitrators) by Geographic Region 17 Chart 15: Nationality of Arbitrators, Conciliators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases 18
1 The data is based on ICSID statistics as of December 31, 2010. 2 The ICSID Fiscal Year covers the period July 1 to June 30.
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 4
PART II - CASES REGISTERED AND ADMINISTERED BY ICSID IN 2010
1. New Cases Registered by ICSID in 2010 20 Chart 1: Number of New Cases Registered under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules in 2010 20
2. Non-ICSID Cases Administered by the ICSID Secretariat in 2010 20 Chart 2: Number of Non-ICSID Cases Administered by the ICSID Secretariat in 2010 20
3. Basis of Consent Invoked to Establish ICSID Jurisdiction in New Cases Registered in 2010 21 Chart 3: Basis of Consent Invoked to Establish ICSID Jurisdiction in New Cases Registered in 2010 21
4. Geographic Distribution of New ICSID Cases Registered in 2010 by State Party Involved 22 Chart 4: Geographic Distribution of New ICSID Cases Registered in 2010 by State Party Involved 22
5. Distribution of New ICSID Cases Registered in 2010 by Economic Sector 23 Chart 5: Distribution of New ICSID Cases Registered in 2010 by Economic Sector 23
6. ICSID Arbitration Proceedings Concluded in 2010 – Outcomes 24 Chart 6: Arbitration Proceedings under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules concluded in 2010 – Outcomes 24 Chart 7: Disputes Decided by Arbitral Tribunals under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules in 2010 – Outcomes 24
7. Arbitrators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases in 2010 25 Chart 8: Arbitrators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases in 2010 – Distribution of Appointments by Geographic Region 25 Chart 9: Arbitrators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases in 2010 – Distribution of Appointments by ICSID and by the Parties (or Party-appointed Arbitrators) by Geographic Region 26 Chart 10: Nationality of Arbitrators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases in 2010 27
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 5
PART I
ALL CASES REGISTERED AND ADMINISTERED BY ICSID
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 6
1. Map of the ICSID Contracting States and Other Signatories to the ICSID Convention as of December 31, 2010
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 7
2. Cases Registered by ICSID
Chart 1: Total Number of ICSID Cases Registered by Year:
As of December 31, 2010, ICSID had registered 331 cases under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules.
1
4
12
12 2
34
1
4
12
13 3 3
1011
1012
14
19
31
27 27
23
37
21
2526
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Cases Registered under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 8
Chart 2: Number of Cases Registered by Year under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules:
Chart 3: Type of Cases Registered under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules:
14
1 2 1 2 1 2 41
41 2 1 2 3 3
8 8 8 914
18
30
2124
21
32
2023 25
1 1 1
1
1
1
2 3 2 3
1
6
2
2
4
1
21
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
ICSID Convention Arbitration Cases ICSID Convention Conciliation Cases ICSID Additional Facility Arbitration Cases
ICSID Convention Arbitration Cases
296(89%)
ICSID Convention Conciliation Cases
6(2%)
ICSID Additional Facility Arbitration Cases
29(9%)
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 9
3. Non-ICSID Cases Administered by the ICSID Secretariat
Chart 4: Number of Non-ICSID Cases Administered by the ICSID Secretariat over the Past Fiscal Years:
The ICSID Secretariat offers various levels of administrative and organizational support for non-ICSID dispute settlement in State-State or investor-State proceedings. Among the State-State cases administered in the past decade are the Southern Bluefin Tuna case (Australia and New Zealand v. Japan), an expert determination proceeding under the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960, and an arbitration under the Softwood Lumber Agreement of 2006 (United States v. Canada).
The Centre also frequently provides administrative assistance to investor-State arbitrations under the UNCITRAL Rules or other ad hoc dispute settlement provisions. The Centre’s services in these proceedings range from support with the organization of hearings to administrative services comparable to those provided in ICSID cases. The Secretariat also acts as appointing authority, and decides proposals for disqualification of arbitrators, upon request. In addition to administering UNCITRAL arbitrations, ICSID has also assisted with the organization of hearings in arbitration proceedings conducted under the auspices of the ICC, LCIA, PCA, and other institutions.
4 3 3 3
10 11 10
7 64 5
2
11
1 3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 July 1 -Dec. 31,
2010UNCITRAL Cases Other Cases
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 10
4. Basis of Consent Invoked to Establish ICSID Jurisdiction in Registered ICSID Cases Chart 5: Basis of Consent Invoked to Establish ICSID Jurisdiction in Registered ICSID Cases:
ASEAN Agreement for the Promotion and Protection
of Investments1%
Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT)
62%
Dominican Republic-United States-Central American Free Trade
Agreement (DR-CAFTA)1%
Investment Contract between the Investor and
the Host-State22%
Investment Law of the Host-State
6%
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
4%
Energy Charter Treaty (ECT)
4%
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 11
5. Geographic Distribution of All ICSID Cases by State Party Involved
Chart 6: Geographic Distribution of All ICSID Cases by State Party Involved*:
* The classification of the geographic regions above is based on the World Bank’s regional system, available at http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/0,,pagePK:180619~theSitePK:136917,00.html, and also includes World Bank donor countries.
South America30%
Central America & the Carribean
8%
North America (Canada, Mexico & U.S.)
5%
Eastern Europe & Central Asia
22%
Western Europe1%
Sub-Saharan Africa17%
Middle East & North Africa
9%
South & East Asia & the Pacific
8%
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 12
6. Distribution of All ICSID Cases by Economic Sector
Chart 7: Distribution of All ICSID Cases by Economic Sector*:
* This sector classification is based on the World Bank’s sector codes, available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/PROJECTS/Resources/SectorCodesLists.pdf.
Finance7%
Information & Communication
6%
Agriculture, Fishing & Forestry
5% Oil, Gas & Mining25%
Electric Power & Other Energy
14%
Water, Sanitation & Flood Protection
7%
Construction7%Tourism
4%
Other Industry10%
Transportation11%
Services & Trade
4%
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 13
7. ICSID Arbitration and Conciliation Proceedings – Outcomes
Chart 8: Arbitration Proceedings under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules – Outcomes:
Chart 9: Disputes Decided by Arbitral Tribunals under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules – Outcomes:
* Pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 41(5) and Article 45(6) of the Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules, as adopted by the ICSID Administrative Council in 2006, a party may at an early stage of the proceeding file an objection that a claim is manifestly without merit. If the Tribunal decides that the claims are manifestly without legal merit, it shall render an award to that effect.
Dispute decided by Tribunal
61%
Dispute settled or proceeding otherwise
discontinued39%
Award deciding that the claims are
manifestly without legal merit
1% *
Award declining jurisdiction
23%
Award dismissing all claims31%
Award upholding claims in part or in full
45%
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 14
Chart 10: Conciliation Proceedings under the ICSID Convention – Outcomes:
Chart 11: Conciliation Proceedings under the ICSID Convention – Commission Reports:
Conciliation Commission Report
issued67%
Proceeding Discontinued
33%
Report recording failure of the parties to
reach agreement75%
Report recording agreement of the
parties25%
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 15
8. Annulment Proceedings under the ICSID Convention – Outcomes
Chart 12: Awards Rendered and Outcomes in Annulment Proceedings under the ICSID Convention, by Decade:
49
18
96
0 1 1
13
0 3 08
0 0 15
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1971-1980 1981-1990 1991-2000 2001-2010
Number of Convention awards rendered Number of decisions rejecting the application for annulment
Number of decisions annulling the award in part or in full Number of annulment proceedings discontinued
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 16
9. Arbitrators, Conciliators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases
Chart 13: Arbitrators, Conciliators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases – Distribution of Appointments by Geographic Region*:
* The classification of the geographic regions above is based on the World Bank’s regional system, available at http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/0,,pagePK:180619~theSitePK:136917,00.html, and also includes World Bank donor countries.
North America (Canada, Mexico & U.S.)
23%
South America9%
Central America & the Caribbean
2%
Middle East & North Africa
6%
Sub-Saharan Africa2%
South & East Asia & the Pacific
8% Eastern Europe & Central Asia
2%
Western Europe48%
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 17
Chart 14: Arbitrators, Conciliators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases – Distribution of Appointments by ICSID and by the Parties (or Party-appointed Arbitrators) by Geographic Region*:
* The geographical classification is based on the World Bank’s regions as set forth at http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/0,,pagePK:180619~theSitePK:136917,00.html, and also includes World Bank donor countries.
38 289
2211
41
8
155
215
70
1338
13
51
9
374
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
North America (Canada, Mexico & U.S.)
South America Central America & the Caribbean
Middle East & North Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa South & East Asia & the Pacific
Eastern Europe & Central Asia
Western Europe
Appointments by ICSID Appointments by the Parties (or Party-appointed Arbitrators)
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 18
Chart 15: Nationality of Arbitrators, Conciliators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases:
133123
10183
7550
3736
3432
3027
2525
2017
151212
109
8888
77777
6666
5555
44444
33333333
222222222222
1111111111
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
U.S.FrenchBritish
CanadianSwiss
SpanishMexicanGerman
AustralianItalian
EgyptianDutch
BelgianChilean
New ZealandArgentine
SwedishColombian
Costa RicanBrazilian
DanishGreek
Lebanese/FrenchUruguayan
VenezuelanEcuadorian
PhilippineSenegalese
SlovakThai
BangladeshiBritish/French
PeruvianSingaporean
AustrianBulgarianGuyanese
IndianAlgerianCypriotIranian
MoroccanSwiss/Brazilian
FinnishHonduran
IsraeliJamaican
MalaysianNigerianPakistaniTogolese
BarbadianBeninese
CzechGaboneseGhanaian
Iranian/FrenchJordanianLebaneseMalagasy
PortugueseSerbian
Swiss/IrishCentral African
CroatianDominica
GuatemalanLuxembourg
MalawianNorwegian
South AfricanSri LankanSudanese
Number of Appointments
Nat
iona
lity
of A
ppoi
ntee
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 19
PART II
CASES REGISTERED AND ADMINISTERED BY ICSID IN 2010
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 20
1. New Cases Registered by ICSID in 2010
Chart 1: Number of New Cases Registered under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules in 2010:
2. Non-ICSID Cases Administered by the ICSID Secretariat in 2010
Chart 2: Number of Non-ICSID Cases Administered by the ICSID Secretariat in 2010:
25
10
5
10
15
20
25
30
ICSID Convention Arbitration Cases
ICSID Additional Facility Arbitration Cases
6
3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNCITRAL Cases Other Cases
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 21
3. Basis of Consent Invoked to Establish ICSID Jurisdiction in New Cases Registered in 2010
Chart 3: Basis of Consent Invoked to Establish ICSID Jurisdiction in New Cases Registered in 2010:
Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT)
62%
Dominican Republic-United States-Central American Free Trade
Agreement (DR-CAFTA)4%
Investment Contract between the Investor and
the Host-State14%
Investment Law of the Host-State
17%
Energy Charter Treaty3%
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 22
4. Geographic Distribution of New ICSID Cases Registered in 2010 by State Party Involved
Chart 4: Geographic Distribution of New ICSID Cases Registered in 2010 by State Party Involved*:
* The classification of the geographic regions above is based on the World Bank’s regional system, available at http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/0,,pagePK:180619~theSitePK:136917,00.html, and also includes World Bank donor countries.
South America31%
Central America & the Carribean
7%Eastern Europe &
Central Asia27%
Sub-Saharan Africa27%
South & East Asia & the Pacific
8%
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 23
5. Distribution of New ICSID Cases Registered in 2010 by Economic Sector
Chart 5: Distribution of New ICSID Cases Registered in 2010 by Economic Sector*:
* The sector classification is based on the World Bank’s sector codes, available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/PROJECTS/Resources/SectorCodesLists.pdf.
Finance4%
Information & Communication
4%
Agriculture, Fishing & Forestry
11%
Oil, Gas & Mining27%
Electric Power & Other Energy
15%Construction8%
Other Industry15%
Transportation8%
Services & Trade8%
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 24
6. ICSID Arbitration Proceedings Concluded in 2010 – Outcomes
Chart 6: Arbitration Proceedings under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules concluded in 2010 – Outcomes:
Chart 7: Disputes Decided by Arbitral Tribunals under the ICSID Convention and Additional Facility Rules in 2010 – Outcomes:
* Pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 41(5) and Article 45(6) of the Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules, as adopted by the ICSID Administrative Council in 2006, a party may at an early stage of the proceeding file an objection that a claim is manifestly without merit. If the Tribunal decides that the claims are manifestly without legal merit, it shall render an award to that effect.
Dispute decided by Tribunal
76%
Dispute settled or proceeding otherwise
discontinued24%
Award deciding that the claims are
manifestly without legal merit
10% *
Award declining jurisdiction
16%
Award dismissing all claims32%
Award upholding claims in part or in full
42%
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 25
7. Arbitrators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases in 2010
Chart 8: Arbitrators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases in 2010 – Distribution of Appointments by Geographic Region*:
* The classification of the geographic regions above is based on the World Bank’s regional system, available at http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/0,,pagePK:180619~theSitePK:136917,00.html, and also includes World Bank donor countries.
North America (Canada, Mexico & U.S.)
26%
South America3%
Middle East & North Africa
5%
Sub-Saharan Africa1%
South & East Asia & the Pacific
14%
Eastern Europe & Central Asia
2%
Western Europe49%
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 26
Chart 9: Arbitrators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases in 2010 – Distribution of Appointments by ICSID and by the Parties (or Party-appointed Arbitrators) by Geographic Region*:
* The classification of the geographic regions above is based on the World Bank’s regional system, available at http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/0,,pagePK:180619~theSitePK:136917,00.html, and also includes World Bank donor countries.
4
0 0 0
3
0
15
20
34
1
10
2
30
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
North America (Canada, Mexico & U.S.)
South America Middle East & North Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa South & East Asia & the Pacific
Eastern Europe & Central Asia
Western Europe
Appointments by ICSID Appointments by the Parties (or Party-appointed Arbitrators)
© 2011 by International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
Content may be reproduced for educational use with acknowledgement. Page | 27
Chart 10: Nationality of Arbitrators and ad hoc Committee Members Appointed in ICSID Cases in 2010:
17
13
9
7
7
6
5
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0 5 10 15 20
French
U.S.
Canadian
British
New Zealand
German
Swiss
Spanish
Egyptian
Argentine
Bangladeshi
Dutch
Malaysian
Mexican
Australian
Belgian
British/French
Colombian
Finnish
Iranian/French
Italian
Malawi
Pakistani
Serbian
Slovak
Number of Appointments
Nat
iona
lity
of A
ppoi
ntee