kent, surrey & sussex crc caseload data. 1. caseload – number of service users with 800...

KENT, SURREY & SUSSEX CRC

Caseload Data

1. Caseload – Number of Service Users

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Brighton Chichester Crawley Eastbourne Hastings Littlehampton Worthing

Sussex Delivery Offices

With 800 service users the Brighton Office has almost double the caseload of the next largest office in Sussex (Worthing office). The Littlehampton office has a very small caseload, no responsible officer and is co-located with the police. The only service users reporting to the Chichester office are undertaking UPW.


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Canterbury Chatham Folkestone Gravesend Maidstone Margate Sittingbourne Tunbridge

Kent Delivery Offices

Each delivery office in Kent has at least 300 service users currently reporting to them. Folkestone and Chatham have the largest proportion of Kent’s caseload reporting to their office respectively. The Chatham office’s catchment area is likely to include much of Medway, whilst Folkestone’s is likely to include such towns as Dover and Ashford.


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Guildford Redhill Staines

Surrey Delivery Offices

The Redhill office has the smallest number of service users attached to it of all the delivery offices across Surrey. Despite this the caseload is still nearly 400.


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Brig

hton

and

Hov

eM

edw

ayTh

anet

Swal

eM

aids

tone

(bla

nk)

Has

tings

Cant

erbu

ryEa

stbo

urne

Aru

nN

o Fi

xed

Abo

deCr

awle

ySh

epw

ayA

shfo

rdD

over

Wor

thin

gG

rave

sham

Gui

ldfo

rdRe

igat

e an

d Ba

nste

adTo

nbri

dge

and

Mal

ling

Spel

thor

neTu

nbri

dge

Wel

lsD

artf

ord

Lew

esW

eald

enW

okin

gSe

veno

aks

Wav

erle

yCh

iche

ster

Roth

erRu

nnym

ede

Adu

rEl

mbr

idge

Hor

sham

Surr

ey H

eath

Mid

Sus

sex

Tand

ridg

eM

ole

Valle

yEp

som

and

Ew

ell

Caseload by Local Authority (excluding those in custody)

As expected, the Unitary Authorities of Brighton and Medway have the largest number of service users(excluding those in custody) across KSS. Over three quarters of the Local Authorities across KSS are home to less than 200 offenders in the community.

1. Caseload – Service Users undertaking UPW

0

50

100

150

200

250

Brig

hton

and

Hov

eM

edw

ayTh

anet

Swal

eM

aids

tone

(bla

nk)

Has

tings

Cant

erbu

ryEa

stbo

urne

Aru

nN

o Fi

xed

Abo

deCr

awle

ySh

epw

ayA

shfo

rdD

over

Wor

thin

gG

rave

sham

Gui

ldfo

rdRe

igat

e an

d Ba

nste

adTo

nbri

dge

and

Mal

ling

Spel

thor

neTu

nbri

dge

Wel

lsD

artf

ord

Lew

esW

eald

enW

okin

gSe

veno

aks

Wav

erle

yCh

iche

ster

Roth

erRu

nnym

ede

Adu

rEl

mbr

idge

Hor

sham

Surr

ey H

eath

Mid

Sus

sex

Tand

ridg

eM

ole

Valle

yEp

som

and

Ew

ell

Caseload undertaking UPW

Whilst the Unitary Authority of Brighton is home to the highest number of service users, it is in fact Medway that is home to the highest number currently undertaking unpaid work (UPW). Whilst there is a large degree of correlation between the number of service users and the number undertaking UPW in each local authority, Brighton is not the only visible discrepancy.

1. Caseload – Service Users undertaking UPW

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Brig

hton

and

Hov

eM

edw

ayTh

anet

Swal

eM

aids

tone

(bla

nk)

Has

tings

Cant

erbu

ryEa

stbo

urne

Aru

nN

o Fi

xed

Abo

deCr

awle

ySh

epw

ayA

shfo

rdD

over

Wor

thin

gG

rave

sham

Gui

ldfo

rdRe

igat

e an

d Ba

nste

adTo

nbri

dge

and

Mal

ling

Spel

thor

neTu

nbri

dge

Wel

lsD

artf

ord

Lew

esW

eald

enW

okin

gSe

veno

aks

Wav

erle

yCh

iche

ster

Roth

erRu

nnym

ede

Adu

rEl

mbr

idge

Hor

sham

Surr

ey H

eath

Mid

Sus

sex

Tand

ridg

eM

ole

Valle

yEp

som

and

Ew

ell

Proportion of caseload undertaking UPW

There is a great degree of variation in the proportion of service users from each Local Authority that are currently undertaking unpaid UPW. In areas such as Brighton and Lewes (served by the same Magistrates’ Court), only 25% of service users are undertaking UPW as part of their sentence. Most Local Authorities across Kent have around 40% of service users undertaking unpaid work whilst in Surrey this proportion increases even further.

1. Caseload – Service Users by sentence type

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800



Community Order Suspended Sentence Custodial Youth

The distribution of service users by sentence type is fairly consistent with what would be expected across each office in Sussex. The Brighton office does however have a larger proportion of service users on the caseload serving a custodial sentence. The Chichester office only works with those undertaking UPW, therefore it has no service users reporting to the office on post-release supervision.


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800




The distribution of service users by sentence type is fairly consistent across each office in Kent.


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800




Again, the distribution of service users by sentence type is fairly consistent across each office in Surrey.

1. Caseload – Service Users by ward

05

101520253035404550

Hastings

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Eastbourne

010203040506070

Brighton and Hove

02468

1012141618

Lewes


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Rother

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Adur

02468

101214

Wealden

0

5

10

15

20

25

Ham

Mar

ine

Orc

hard

Hot

ham

Bers

ted

Peve

nsey

Beac

h

Wic

k w

ith

Todd

ingt

on

Rive

r

East

Pre

ston

wit

h Ki

ngst

on

Barn

ham

Mid

dlet

on-o

n-Se

a

Aldw

ick

Wes

t

Yapt

on

Rusti

ngto

n W

est

Felp

ham

Eas

t

Broo

kfiel

d

Find

on

Angm

erin

g

Pagh

am a

nd R

ose

Gre

en

Rusti

ngto

n Ea

st

Aldw

ick

East

Arun

del

Wal

bert

on

Felp

ham

Wes

t

Arun


02468

1012141618

Chichester

0

5

10

15

20

25

Crawley

0123456789

10

Hay

war

ds H

eath

…

Hur

stpi

erpo

int a

nd D

owns

Burg

ess H

ill D

unst

all

East

Gri

nste

ad A

shpl

ats

Burg

ess H

ill V

icto

ria

Cuck

field

East

Gri

nste

ad T

own

Burg

ess H

ill L

eyla

nds

Ardi

ngly

and

Bal

com

be

Burg

ess H

ill S

t And

rew

s

Hay

war

ds H

eath

…

Hay

war

ds H

eath

Hea

th

Hay

war

ds H

eath

Luc

aste

s

Craw

ley

Dow

n an

d …

Has

sock

s

Burg

ess H

ill M

eeds

Boln

ey

East

Gri

nste

ad H

eron

tye

Copt

horn

e an

d W

orth

Ashu

rst W

ood

Burg

ess H

ill F

rank

land

s

East

Gri

nste

ad B

aldw

ins

Hay

war

ds H

eath

…

Lind

field

Mid Sussex

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Horsham


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Worthing

0

5

10

15

20

25

Beav

erVi

ctor

iaN

orm

anSt

anho

peAy

lesf

ord

Gre

enW

eald

Sou

thSt

our

Bybr

ook

Gre

at C

hart

wit

h …So

uth

Will

esbo

roug

hBo

ckha

nger

God

into

nW

ashf

ord

Wea

ld C

entr

alBo

ught

on A

luph

and

…Li

ttle

Bur

ton

Farm

Nor

th W

illes

boro

ugh

Park

Far

m S

outh

Sing

leto

n So

uth

Tent

erde

n So

uth

Wea

ld E

ast

Wye

Dow

ns W

est

Char

ing

Park

Far

m N

orth

Wea

ld N

orth

St M

icha

els

Bidd

ende

nD

owns

Nor

thH

ighfi

eld

Saxo

n Sh

ore

Tent

erde

n N

orth

Ashford

05

1015202530354045

Canterbury

02468

10121416

Dartford


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Gravesham

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Hig

h St

reet

Shep

way

Nor

th

Fant

East

Nor

th

Park

Woo

d

Shep

way

Sou

th

Mar

den

and

Yald

ing

Brid

ge

Coxh

eath

and

Hun

ton

Sout

h

Boxl

ey

Hea

th

Har

riet

sham

and

Len

ham

Hea

dcor

n

Allin

gton

Nor

th D

owns

Bear

sted

Stap

lehu

rst

Sutt

on V

alen

ce a

nd …

Det

ling

and

Thur

nham

Dow

nsw

ood

and

Oth

am

Leed

s

Barm

ing

Maidstone

05

101520253035404550

Medway

0

5

10

15

20

25

Dover


02468

1012141618

Swan

ley

Whi

te O

ak

Ash

Swan

ley

St M

ary'

s

Hex

tabl

e

Swan

ley

Chri

stch

urch

…

Eden

brid

ge S

outh

and

…

Har

tley

and

Hod

soll

Stre

et

Faw

kham

and

Wes

t …

Leig

h an

d Ch

iddi

ngst

one …

Wes

terh

am a

nd …

Eden

brid

ge N

orth

and

Eas

t

Hal

stea

d, K

nock

holt

and …

Kem

sing

Otf

ord

and

Shor

eham

Seve

noak

s Nor

ther

n

Farn

ingh

am, H

orto

n …

Seve

noak

s Eas

tern

Seve

noak

s Tow

n an

d St

…

Bras

ted,

Che

veni

ng a

nd …

Croc

kenh

ill a

nd W

ell H

ill

Seal

and

Wea

ld

Seve

noak

s Kip

ping

ton

Cow

den

and

Hev

er

Pens

hurs

t, F

ordc

ombe

…

Sevenoaks

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Folk

esto

ne H

arve

y Ce

ntra

l

Folk

esto

ne H

arbo

ur

Folk

esto

ne F

oord

Folk

esto

ne C

heri

ton

Nor

th D

owns

Eas

t

Folk

esto

ne H

arve

y W

est

Folk

esto

ne S

andg

ate

Folk

esto

ne E

ast

Folk

esto

ne M

oreh

all

Dym

chur

ch a

nd S

t Mar

y's …

Lydd

Rom

ney

Mar

sh

Hyt

he C

entr

al

Folk

esto

ne P

ark

New

Rom

ney

Tow

n

Hyt

he E

ast

Hyt

he W

est

Nor

th D

owns

Wes

t

Lym

pne

and

Stan

ford

New

Rom

ney

Coas

t

Tols

ford

Shepway

05

1015202530354045

Shep

pey

Cent

ral

Shee

rnes

s Eas

t

Mur

ston

Shee

rnes

s Wes

t

Que

enbo

roug

h an

d …

Wat

ling

Gro

ve

Chal

kwel

l

Min

ster

Cliff

s

Milt

on R

egis

Rom

an

Leys

dow

n an

d W

arde

n

Kem

sley

Dav

ingt

on P

riory

St A

nn's

Teyn

ham

and

Lyn

sted

St M

icha

els

Har

tlip

, New

ingt

on a

nd …

Bord

en

Boug

hton

and

Cou

rten

ay

Woo

dsto

ck

Iwad

e an

d Lo

wer

Hal

stow

Wes

t Dow

ns

Abbe

y

East

Dow

ns

Swale

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Thanet


0

5

10

15

20

25

Snod

land

Eas

tEa

st M

allin

gTr

ench

Cast

leKi

ngs H

illSn

odla

nd W

est

Hig

ham

Lark

field

Nor

thD

itton

Lark

field

Sou

thM

edw

ayAy

lesf

ord

Dow

nsH

adlo

w, M

erew

orth

and

…Ju

ddVa

uxha

llEa

st P

eckh

am a

nd …

Boro

ugh

Gre

en a

nd L

ong …

Cage

Gre

enBu

rham

, Ecc

les a

nd …

Wat

erin

gbur

yW

roth

amBl

ue B

ell H

ill a

nd …

Hild

enbo

roug

hIg

htha

mW

est M

allin

g an

d …

Tonbridge and Malling

02468

1012141618

Sout

hbor

ough

and

Hig

h …

Sher

woo

d

Gou

dhur

st a

nd …

Park

St Ja

mes

'

St Jo

hn's

Bene

nden

and

Cra

nbro

ok

Culv

erde

n

Haw

khur

st a

nd S

andh

urst

Panti

les a

nd S

t Mar

k's

Pem

bury

Broa

dwat

er

Rust

hall

Padd

ock

Woo

d W

est

Bren

chle

y an

d …

Cape

l

Spel

dhur

st a

nd B

idbo

roug

h

Fritt

ende

n an

d Si

ssin

ghur

st

Sout

hbor

ough

Nor

th

Padd

ock

Woo

d Ea

st

Tunbridge Wells

02468

101214

Elmbridge

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Epsom and Ewell


0

5

10

15

20

25

Guildford

02468

101214

Mole Valley

02468

1012141618

Runnymede

02468

101214161820

Reigate and Banstead


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Spelthorne

02468

10121416

Surrey Heath

0123456789

10

Cran

leig

h Ea

stFa

rnha

m C

astl

eG

odal

min

g Bi

nsco

mbe

Farn

ham

Fir

grov

eFa

rnha

m M

oor P

ark

Farn

ham

Upp

er H

ale

God

alm

ing

Farn

com

be …

Farn

ham

Wre

ccle

sham

…Br

amle

y, B

usbr

idge

and

…Ch

iddi

ngfo

ld a

nd D

unsf

old

Elst

ead

and

Thur

sley

Farn

ham

Hal

e an

d H

eath

…Fa

rnha

m S

hort

heat

h an

d …Fa

rnha

m W

eybo

urne

and …

Fren

sham

, Doc

kenfi

eld …

Has

lem

ere

East

and

…M

ilfor

dAl

fold

, Cra

nlei

gh R

ural

…Cr

anle

igh

Wes

tG

odal

min

g Ce

ntra

l and

…H

asle

mer

e Cr

itchm

ere …

Ewhu

rst

God

alm

ing

Char

terh

ouse

Wit

ley

and

Ham

bled

onBl

ackh

eath

and

Won

ersh

God

alm

ing

Hol

low

ay

Waverley

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Tandridge


Each Local Authority has at least one ward with a high proportion of service users when compared to other wards in the district. An example of this would be in Eastbourne where nearly a third of service users in the district reside in the ward of Devonshire.

The caseload by ward data is useful in identifying the best location for the delivery offices across the KSS CRC.

05

101520253035

Woking

2. Service User Profile - Gender

121

21

59

68

42

4

81

673

156

368

345

367

39

399

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Brighton

Chichester

Crawley

Eastbourne

Hastings

Littlehampton

Worthing


Female Male

Brighton, Worthing and Eastbourne offices have a high proportion of female service users currently reporting to them. This may just be at this point in time, however, it could also be explained for operational reasons (provision of service, space etc). Inspire hold Women’s only contract across Sussex, however, CRI provide the staff in some of the areas.


44

75

81

43

43

68

43

81

257

534

574

387

319

416

303

381

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Canterbury

Chatham

Folkestone

Gravesend

Maidstone

Margate

Sittingbourne

Tunbridge


Female Male

18% of the Tunbridge office’s caseload is female. Again, this may be just at this point of time but future analysis may indicate a trend.


98

43

58

470

349

390

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Guildford

Redhill

Staines


Female Male

18% of the Guildford office’s caseload is female compared to just 10% in the Redhill office.

2. Service User Profile - Age

56

11

26

34

30

33

138

49

91

70

72

8

80

108

28

65

54

57

10

80

207

45

112

116

117

11

134

172

30

81

81

87

11

95

86

12

41

37

35

1

45

27

2

11

21

11

2

13

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Brighton

Chichester

Crawley

Eastbourne

Hastings

Littlehampton

Worthing


Under 21 21-25 26-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60+

The age range of service users in Sussex is fairly consistent from office to office. The younger caseload at Chichester can potentially be explained by the nature of those it works with (those undertaking UPW).


22

42

52

40

24

38

23

39

67

116

127

75

80

100

70

75

40

101

83

69

49

72

45

54

89

186

190

126

105

127

95

139

48

106

109

80

68

97

64

95

26

42

67

28

27

43

36

42

9

16

27

12

9

7

13

18

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Canterbury

Chatham

Folkestone

Gravesend

Maidstone

Margate

Sittingbourne

Tunbridge


Under 21 21-25 26-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60+

The age range of service users in Kent is fairly consistent from office to office. However, Folkestone office does have a higher proportion aged 50 and above (14%).


53

28

40

112

85

87

77

66

52

151

97

128

102

69

78

51

32

49

22

15

14

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Guildford

Redhill

Staines


Under 21 21-25 26-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60+

Again, the age range of service users in Surrey is fairly consistent from office to office. The only difference between the Surrey caseload and the caseload in the other two counties is that it seems to have a higher proportion aged under 21. However, the difference is minimal.

2. Service User Profile – Ethnicity

83%

4%

3%

2%

6%

1%17%

Brighton

White British

Mixed

Black

Asian

White Other

Other

83%

4%

3%

2%

6%

1%

17%

Brighton

71%

2%1%1%

23%

1%

29%

Chichester

80%

3%

4%

6% 7%

0%

20%

Crawley

87%

4%

3%

1%

5%

1%

13%

Eastbourne

86%

2%3%

1%

6%

1%14%

Hastings

92%8%

8%

Littlehampton

92%

1%2%

1%

3%

0%8%

Worthing


83%

4%

3%

2%

6%

1%17%

Brighton

White British

Mixed

Black

Asian

White Other

Other

83%

2%5%

3%

7%

1%

17%

Canterbury

85%

1%

2%1%

10%

0%

15%

Margate

85%

2%2%

2%

10%

0%

15%

Maidstone

82%

2%5%

4%

6%

1%

18%

Chatham

86%

2%1%

2%

7%

1%14%

Folkestone

77%

2%10%

4%

5%

3%

23%

Gravesend

90%

0%

2%0%

7%

10%

Sittingbourne

92%

1%

1%1%

5%

0%8%

Tunbridge


83%

4%

3%

2%

6%

1%17%

Brighton

White British

Mixed

Black

Asian

White Other

Other

84%

1%2%

4%

8%

0%

16%

Guildford

81%

2%5%

1%

9%

1%

19%

Redhill

86%

2%2%

5%

4%

1%

14%

Staines

Across the CRC there is some degree of variation in the proportion of BME service users reporting to the delivery offices. In Chichester, which only works with those undertaking UPW, 29% of the caseload is BME. Other notable areas include Gravesend and Crawley where 23% and 20% of the offices’ caseload are BME respectively.

3. Resettlement – Prison location in regards to CRC offices

The below map outlines the location of prisons relative to the delivery offices.

3. Resettlement – Prison location in regards to CRC offices

Prison Nearest delivery office Distance to delivery office

Elmley Sittingbourne 12.7 miles

Stanford Hill Sittingbourne 12.7 miles

East Sutton Park Maidstone 6.7 miles

Rochester Medway 2.6 miles

Blantyre House Maidstone 11.9 miles

High Down Crawley 21 miles

Lewes Brighton 18 miles

Ford Worthing 12 miles

Bronzefield (not lead provider) Staines 1.1 miles

Send ( not lead provider) Guildford 6.6 miles

Surrey and Sussex

Kent

Prison Location

Most prisons are at least 10 miles away from the nearest delivery office. High Down appears to be the Prison furthest from a delivery office at 21 miles away from Crawley.

3. Resettlement – The current picture – Custody and Licence caseload

0

50

100

150

200

250

Brighton Crawley Eastbourne Hastings Littlehampton Worthing


Custody Licence

Of those service users on the caseload serving a custodial sentence, the majority remain in prison. This is consistent across the delivery offices in Sussex.

3. Resettlement – The current picture - Custody and Licence caseload

0

50

100

150

200

250



Custody Licence

Whilst the ratio of service users on licence against those in custody is generally consistent with what would be expected across the Kent delivery offices, the Chatham office actually has more on licence compared to those in custody.

3. Resettlement – The current picture - Custody and Licence caseload

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160



Custody Licence

The ratio of service users on licence against those in custody is generally consistent with what would be expected across the Surrey delivery offices.

4. Sentencing - Requirements across CRC

As would be expected, across the CRC the two most common sentence requirements are supervision and UPW. Over time the Rehabilitation Activity Requirement (RAR) will replace supervision.

3551

2662

958 877

402 391 349 263112 46 73 28

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

CRC Sentence Requirements

4. Sentencing - Requirements by delivery office

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Court - Supervision

0

50

100

150

200

250

Court - UPW

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Court - Accredited Programme

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Court - Drug Rehabilitation


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Court - Alcohol Treatment

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Court - Specified Activity

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Court - Curfew

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Court - Prohibited Activity


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Licence - Supervision

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Licence - Curfew

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Licence - Prohibited Activity

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Licence - Accredited Programme

4. Sentencing – Accredited Programmes by delivery office

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80



Building Better Relationships (BBR) Thinking Skills (TSP)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Kent Delivery OfficesBuilding Better Relationships (BBR) Thinking Skills (TSP)

Integrated Domestic Abuse Aggression Replacement Training

Drink Impaired Drivers

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50



Building Better Relationships (BBR) Thinking Skills (TSP)

5. Criminogenic Need – Current caseload OASys results

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Criminogenic Need - KSS CRC

5. Criminogenic Need and provision of services – Current caseload OASys results by gender

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Criminogenic Need - KSS CRC by Gender

Female Male

5. Criminogenic Need and provision of services - Current caseload OASys results by delivery office

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Brighton

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Chichester

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Crawley

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Eastbourne

5. Criminogenic Need and provision of services – Current caseload OASys results by delivery office

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Hastings

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Littlehampton

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Worthing The OASys results identify a great degree of variation in service user needs across KSS. From this it can be determined if the correct provision is currently in place.


0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Canterbury

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Chatham

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Folkestone

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Gravesend


0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Maidstone

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Margate

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Sittingbourne

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Tunbridge


0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Guildford

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Redhill

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Staines

6. Accommodation Need of Service Users - Kent

No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Canterbury

Community Sentence Licence


10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Chatham



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Folkestone


In Kent:• 16% of service users sentenced

to a community sentence were identified as having an accommodation need linked to their offending behaviour

• This was significantly greater for those released on licence with 35%.

6. Accommodation Need of Service Users - Kent


10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Maidstone



5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Sittingbourne



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Tunbridge Wells



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Gravesend


6. Accommodation Need of Service Users - Surrey

No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%

Redhill



10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%

Staines



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Guildford


In Surrey:• 9% of service users sentenced to

a community sentence were identified as having an accommodation need linked to their offending behaviour


6. Accommodation Need of Service Users - Sussex


10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%

Eastbourne



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Brighton



5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Crawley


In Sussex:• 19% of service users sentenced

to a community sentence were identified as having an accommodation need linked to their offending behaviour


6. Accommodation Need of Service Users - Sussex


5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Worthing



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Hastings


7. Female Caseload – Sentence Type

The proportion of suspended sentence orders in Crawley and Eastbourne is higher than that of the other offices in Sussex. Community Orders on average account for around 60% of the caseload in Sussex with the exception of Crawley that only has 4 fewer females sentenced to a custodial sentence than Brighton. The Chichester office only works with those undertaking UPW.

Brighton Chichester Crawley Eastbourne Hastings Worthing0

20

40

60

80

100

120


Suspended Sentence Community Order Custodial Youth


Tunbridge Wells with the second most female service users in Kent, also has the highest proportion of Suspended Sentence Order’s accounting for 44% of all females in Tunbridge Wells. Folkestone has the greatest number of service users overall, but only has the third most females of all the offices in Kent. The Chatham office has the greatest proportion of female’s sentenced to custody than all other offices across the CRC.

Canterbury Chatham Folkestone Gravesend Maidstone Margate Sittingbourne Tunbridge Wells0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100




The distribution of service users by sentence type is fairly consistent across each of the offices in Surrey. The delivery offices with the greatest number of female service users are Brighton, Chatham and Guildford, located in Sussex, Kent and Surrey respectively.

Guildford Redhill Staines0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90



7. Female Caseload – Main Offence Type

Violence and Theft (Non-motor) are the most frequent offence types, accounting for 23% and 21% respectively of the female service users across the entire CRC. The number of female service users with a Drink Driving offence ranges between 28 and 31 in Sussex, Kent and Surrey, although the proportion is much higher in Surrey due to lower overall number of female service users.

Violence

Theft

(Non-m

otor)

Fraud an

d forge

ry

Drug p

ossessi

on/supply

Drink d

riving

Other offen

ce

Public ord

er

Burglary

Criminal

damag

e

Other motorin

g

Handlin

g stolen

goods

Takin

g & driv

ing away

Robbery

Solici

ting or p

rosti

tution0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Sussex Kent Surrey

7. Female Caseload – Ward

Only 8 wards have more than 8 female service users, with the top 1 being Chatham Central with 13. Of the top 8 wards across KSS, 3 are in Kent, 3 in Brighton and Hove and 2 in East Sussex. Over 75% of wards across the CRC only have 1 female service user.

7. Female Profile – Age

Brighton

Chichester

Crawley

Eastbourne

Hastings

Worthing

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

5

4

8

4

8

12

1

9

10

8

11

16

3

5

8

7

14

32

3

17

19

10

23

22

5

19

13

5

13

13

3

4

8

3

3

1

1

3

1

3

Sussex Delivery OfficesUnder 21 21 - 25 26 - 29 30 - 39 40 - 49 50 - 59 60+

Chichester has the lowest proportion of younger female service users and this could indicate that fewer young females are sentenced to stand alone UPW.


Canterbury

Chatham

Folkestone

Gravesend

Maidstone

Margate

Sittingbourne

Tunbridge Wells

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

1

2

4

4

5

3

3

6

9

10

7

11

9

9

11

10

5

8

11

3

10

10

4

6

13

32

23

14

15

19

10

24

5

25

12

14

9

7

7

19

5

6

9

2

5

3

3

7

2

3

1

1

3

6

Kent Delivery OfficesUnder 21 21 - 25 26 - 29 30 - 39 40 - 49 50 - 59 60+

The age range of female service users in Kent is fairly consistent, with Sittingbourne having the highest proportion of under 30’s and being the only office without any females aged 60+.


Guildford

Redhill

Staines

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

6

2

4

9

8

8

16

6

8

20

17

14

16

9

9

11

6

9

3

1

3

Surrey Delivery OfficesUnder 21 21 - 25 26 - 29 30 - 39 40 - 49 50 - 59 60+

The age range of female service users in Surrey is fairly consistent across the delivery offices and does not differ that much to the overall CRC distribution.

7. Female Profile – Ethnicity

86%

2%1%1%9%

Brighton

86%

7%7%

Chichester

80%

5%4%2%

9%

Crawley

93%

3%3%

Eastbourne

78%

3%3%

17%

Hastings

90%

3%3%3%

Worthing

The proportion of white British female service users does differ between the delivery offices with the majority around 90%. Hastings and Redhill have the lowest proportion of white British with the difference predominantly made up of other white backgrounds.


100%

Canterbury

85%

1%6%

4%4%

Chatham

92%

3%2%3%

Folkestone

80%

2%

9%5% 5%

Gravesend

88%

2%9%

Maidstone

85%

4%2%

9%

Margate

89%

3%8%

Sittingbourne

95%

5%

Tunbridge Wells


95%

5%

Guildford

72%

6%

8%

14%

Redhill

80%

9%3%

6% 3%

Staines

The proportion of white British female service users does differ between the delivery offices with the majority around 90%. Hastings and Redhill have the lowest proportion of white British with the difference predominantly made up of other white backgrounds. Guildford has 61 white British females and 3 from other white backgrounds and Canterbury’s female caseload is entirely white British with 33 in total.

7. Female Profile – OGRS band (Offender Group Reconviction Scale)

Brighton

Chichester

Crawley

Eastbourne

Hastings

Worthing

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

43

12

41

33

17

28

28

9

20

11

16

15

1

3

3

7

15

4

1

2

2

3

11

2

5

11

1

13

Sussex Delivery OfficesLow Medium High Very High N/A

Of the 56 female service users with high and very high OGRS, 28 also had medium risk of harm (6 to children, 17 to a known adult and 5 to both). Chichester has the highest proportion of service users with a low OGRS, all of which are undertaking stand alone UPW with the exception of 3 also sentenced to Inspire. The 12 Very High risk cases includes 6 service users undertaking Inspire.


Canterbury

Chatham

Folkestone

Gravesend

Maidstone

Margate

Sittingbourne

Tunbridge Wells

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

20

46

47

22

29

25

19

43

8

14

13

13

12

14

7

17

4

9

3

4

7

10

4

7

8

11

3

5

3

4

6

8

6

1

5

2

1

2

3

Kent Delivery OfficesLow Medium High Very High N/A

Folkestone has the greatest proportion of low risk cases, with all other offices having around 50% of cases that are low risk. Of the 68 female service users in Kent that are high and very high OGRS, 21 also had medium risk of harm (4 to children, 13 to a known adult and 4 to both).


Guildford

Redhill

Staines

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

48

32

34

11

4

2

8

1

3

3

2

11

12

14

Surrey Delivery OfficesLow Medium High Very High N/A

The female caseload in Surrey has a predominantly low OGRS, exceeding 60%. Of the 17 female service users with high and very high OGRS, 8 also had medium risk of harm (4 to children, 3 to a known adult, 1 to both and 1 to staff).

8. Need Linked to Offending – Female service users by delivery office - Sussex

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Brighton

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Chichester

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Crawley

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Eastbourne

8. Need Linked to Offending – Female service users by delivery office - Sussex

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Hastings

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Littlehampton

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Worthing

8. Need Linked to Offending – Female service users by delivery office - Kent

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Canterbury

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Chatham

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Folkestone

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Gravesend

8. Need Linked to Offending – Female service users by delivery office - Kent

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Maidstone

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Margate

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Sittingbourne

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Tunbridge

8. Need Linked to Offending – Female service users by delivery office - Surrey

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Guildford

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Redhill

Accommodati

on ETE

Finan

ce

Releati

onships

Lifest

yleDru

gs

Alcohol

Emotional

Well

-being

Thinkin

g & Beh

aviour

Attitude0%

50%

100%

Staines

• 100% of service users in Chichester have an attitude need, the next highest is Guildford with 74%

• Folkestone and Hastings have the highest relationships need (66% and 60%)• Hastings and Folkestone have the highest accommodation need (37% and 35% respectively)• Gravesend has the highest ETE need (34%)• Hastings and Sittingbourne have the highest drugs need (43% and 40%)• 100% of women in Redhill have a thinking & behaviour need

9. Female Sentencing – Top 10 requirement combinations

These 10 requirement combinations account for 83% of the total current community and suspended sentence orders. Stand alone UPW is the most common sentence, closely followed by a combination of Supervision and Specified Activity. Women’s Inspire accounts for 70% of the service users sentenced to a stand alone SAR.

Supervision, SAR, ATR

Supervision, ATR

SAR, UPW

Supervision, UPW

Supervision, UPW, SAR

Supervision, DRR

SAR

Supervision

Supervision, SAR

UPW

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Requirement Combinations

9. Female Sentencing – Requirements across the CRC

Supervision is the most common requirement with 61% of female service users sentenced to a community or suspended sentence order having a supervision requirement. Specified Activity Requirement’s (SAR) are the second most common with 39% sentenced to a SAR with the majority being women’s specified activity requirements, 171 of which to Women’s Inspire.

Court - S

upervisio

n

Court - S

pecified

Activit

y

Court - U

npaid W

ork

Court - D

rug R

ehab

ilitati

on

Court - A

lcohol T

reatm

ent

Court - C

urfew

Court - R

ehab

ilitati

on Activit

y Req

uiremen

t (RAR)

Court - A

ccred

ited Pro

gramme

Court - M

ental

Health

Trea

tmen

t

Licen

ce - S

upervisio

n

Court - P

rohibite

d Activit

y

Licen

ce - C

urfew

Licen

ce - P

rohibite

d Activit

y0

100

200

300

400

500

600514

328261

57 58 43 24 15 11 11 6 5 7

CRC Sentence Requirements

9. Female Sentencing – Sentence lengths

A higher proportion of female service users in Brighton and Crawley are currently serving community sentences of less than 12 months than elsewhere in the CRC. However, Crawley also has a higher proportion of female service users serving a community sentence of 24 months.

Custody Community Community Custody Community Custody Community Custody Community Custody CommunityBrighton Chichester Crawley Eastbourne Hastings Worthing

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Sussex Delivery Offices<12 months 12 months 13-23 months 24 months 2+ years


A high proportion of female custody cases in Surrey are serving a sentence of more than 2 years. These cases account for 67.6% of all of Surrey’s female custody cases, whereas this figure is 47.4% and 42.2% for Kent and Sussex respectively.

Custody Community Custody Community Custody CommunityGuildford Redhill Staines

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Surrey Delivery Offices<12 months 12 months 13-23 months 24 months 2+ years


Only 157 are currently subject to custodial sentences in the CRC, so the figures may be unrepresentative, however there is currently only 1 female custody case in the Maidstone team. The average number for the rest of the CRC is 11, and Chatham currently has the highest with 23.

Cust

ody

Com

mun

ity

Cust

ody

Com

mun

ity

Cust

ody

Com

mun

ity

Cust

ody

Com

mun

ity

Cust

ody

Com

mun

ity

Cust

ody

Com

mun

ity

Cust

ody

Com

mun

ity

Cust

ody

Com

mun

ity


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Kent Delivery Offices<12 months 12 months 12-23 months 24 months 2+ years

kent, surrey & sussex crc caseload data. 1. caseload – number of service users with 800...

Documents

caseload service users

distribution of service

small caseload

brighton office

number undertaking upw

largest office

chichester office

redhill office