the impacts of ingratiation on interpersonal attraction

14
165 Journal of Youth Studies July 2010 Vol. 13 No. 2 (Serial No. 26) 2010 The Hong Kong Federation of Youth Groups The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction and Interpersonal Relation of Hong Kong Youth Kwok Kuen TSANG Yi LIAN There is not much literature about the ingratiation of youth. This limits our understanding about the effects of ingratiation to the interpersonal attraction and interpersonal relations of youth. Consequently, the overall development of the studies and theories in this field are limited. The purpose of this study is to investigate this issue with Hong Kong youth through an online questionnaire survey. The results show that ingratiation cannot enhance the interpersonal attraction of youth. It is not necessary for ingratiation to improve the interpersonal relation of youth through enhancing their interpersonal attraction. In addition, this article also gives suggestions to improve the social life of the youth. Keywords: ingratiation; interpersonal attraction; interpersonal relation School of Professional and Continuing Education, The University of Hong Kong Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Kwok Kuen TSANG, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong; email: [email protected] Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong

Upload: others

Post on 26-Oct-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction

165

Journal of Youth Studies July 2010 Vol. 13 No. 2 (Serial No. 26) 2010 The Hong Kong Federation of Youth Groups

The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction

and Interpersonal Relation of Hong Kong Youth

Kwok Kuen TSANG

Yi LIAN

There is not much literature about the ingratiation of youth. This limits our understanding about the

effects of ingratiation to the interpersonal attraction and interpersonal relations of youth.

Consequently, the overall development of the studies and theories in this field are limited. The

purpose of this study is to investigate this issue with Hong Kong youth through an online questionnaire

survey. The results show that ingratiation cannot enhance the interpersonal attraction of youth. It is

not necessary for ingratiation to improve the interpersonal relation of youth through enhancing their

interpersonal attraction. In addition, this article also gives suggestions to improve the social life of

the youth.

Keywords: ingratiation; interpersonal attraction; interpersonal relation

School of Professional and Continuing Education, The University of Hong Kong

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Kwok Kuen TSANG, Faculty of Education, The

University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong; email: [email protected]

Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong

Page 2: The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction

166

Page 3: The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction

167

Page 4: The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction

168

Page 5: The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction

169

α

Page 6: The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction

170

因素負荷量

題目 自我表現 順從他人 施恩 謙虛

16 0.9070.9070.9070.907 0.052 0.107 -0.032

15 0.9000.9000.9000.900 0.050 0.039 0.174

14 0.8720.8720.8720.872 0.276 0.038 0.079

13 0.7450.7450.7450.745 0.218 0.330 -0.051

8 0.227 0.8320.8320.8320.832 0.132 0.022

6 -0.091 0.7720.7720.7720.772 0.182 -0.190

7 0.224 0.7420.7420.7420.742 0.092 0.187

5 0.265 0.6180.6180.6180.618 0.009 0.365

12 0.139 0.5330.5330.5330.533 0.003 0.488

3 0.318 0.5080.5080.5080.508 0.320 0.189

18 -0.302 0.4860.4860.4860.486 0.391 -0.319

10 0.099 -0.018 0.8580.8580.8580.858 -0.127

11 0.027 0.033 0.8040.8040.8040.804 0.041

4 0.197 0.158 0.7610.7610.7610.761 0.007

1 0.283 0.238 0.7550.7550.7550.755 0.094

9 -0.094 0.210 0.4380.4380.4380.438 0.242

20 -0.180 -0.165 -0.062 0.7610.7610.7610.761

19 0.052 0.285 0.043 0.7420.7420.7420.742

17 0.216 0.056 0.127 0.6250.6250.6250.625

信度 (α) 0.918 0.807 0.845 0.646

Page 7: The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction

171

因素負荷量

題目 社交吸引 外表吸引

6 0.8110.8110.8110.811 0.120

1 0.7960.7960.7960.796 0.137

3 0.7640.7640.7640.764 -0.0330

5 0.6990.6990.6990.699 0.107

4 0.6570.6570.6570.657 0.042

7 ----0.4800.4800.4800.4800000 0.329

2 0.4710.4710.4710.471 -0.0150

11 0.124 0.9310.9310.9310.931

10 0.151 0.9160.9160.9160.916

8 0.067 0.8920.8920.8920.892

9 -0.4930 0.5460.5460.5460.546

信度 (α) 0.733 0.853

Page 8: The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction

172

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1. 自我表現 - - - - - - -

2. 順從他人 0.356** - - - - - -

3. 施恩 0.176 0.348** - - - - -

4. 謙虛 0.005 0.176 0.171 - - - -

5. 社交吸引 0.061** 0.284** -0.204* 0.048 - - -

6. 外表吸引 0.525** 0.300** 0.073 -0.044 0.101 - -

7. 人際關係 0.481** 0.408** 0.411** 0.174 -0.039 0.331** -

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1. 自我表現 - - - - - - -

2. 順從他人 0.360** - - - - - -

3. 施恩 0.206** 0.352** - - - - -

4. 謙虛 -0.008** 0.181** 0.212** - - - -

5. 社交吸引 0.054** 0.287** -0.189** 0.037 - - -

6. 外表吸引 0.547** 0.299** 0.039** -0.025 0.115 - -

7. 人際關係 0.474** 0.416** 0.465** 0.158 -0.051 0.359** -

Page 9: The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction

173

1 2 3 4 5

1. 自我表現 - - - - -

2. 順從他人 0.258** - - - -

3. 施恩 0.223* 0.433** - - -

4. 謙虛 0.008 0.194* 0.225** - -

5. 人際關係 0.356** 0.390** 0.476** 0.184 -

變項 B SEB β

自我表現 0.199 0.058 0.324**

順從他人 0.125 0.067 0.165**

施恩 0.209 0.060 0.291**

外表吸引 0.060 0.061 0.090**

Page 10: The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction

174

Page 11: The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction

175

Page 12: The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction

176

Bassani, C. (2007). Five dimensions of social capital

theory as they pertain to youth studies. Journal of

Youth Studies, 10(1), 17-34.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life.

New York: Wiley.

Bohra, K. A., & Pandey, J. (1984). Ingratiation toward

strangers, friends, and bosses. The Journal of Social

Psychology, 122, 217-222.

Brodsky, S. L. (2004). Coping with cross-examination

and other pathways to effect ive test imony .

Washington: American Psychological Association.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: the social structure

of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University

Press.

Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York:

Academic Press.

Colella, A., & Varma, A (2001). The impact of

subordinate disability on leader-member exchange

relationships. The Academy of Management Journal,

44(2), 304-315.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of

human capital. The American Journal of Sociology,

94, S95-S120.

Cooper, C. D. (2005). Just joking around? Employee

humor expression as an ingratiatory behavior.

Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 765-776.

Couper, M. P. (2001). Web surveys: A review of issues

and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(4),

464-494.

Deluga, R. J., & Perry, J. T. (1994). The role of

subordinate performance and ingratiation in leader-

member exchanges. Group and Organization

Management, 19(1), 67-86.

Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C. (2006). Collectivism as a

moderator of responses to organizational justice:

Implications for leader-member exchange and

ingratiation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27,

1-17.

Field, J. (2003). Social Capital. London: Routledge.

Fukuyama, F. (1999). Social capital and civil society.

Retrieved February 21, 2009 from http://www.imf.

org/external /pubs/ f t /seminar/1999/reforms/

fukuyama.htm

Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern China.

Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237-257.

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal

relations. New York: Wiley.

Hewson, C., Yule, P., Laurent, D., & Vogel, C. (2003).

Internet research methods: A practical guide for the

social and behavioural sciences. London: SAGE

Publications.

Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese

power game. The American Journal of Sociology,

92(2), 944-974.

Jones, E. E. (1964). Ingratiation: A social psychological

Page 13: The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction

177

analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Jones, E. E., Wortman, C. (1973). Ingratiation: An

attributional approach. Morristown: General Learning

Press.

Layton, B. D., & Insko, C. A. (1974). Anticipated

interaction and the similarity-attraction effect.

Sociometry, 37(2), 149-162.

Liden, R. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (1988). Ingratiatory

behaviors in organizational settings. Academy of

Management Review, 13(4), 572-587.

Liden, R. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (1988). Ingratiatory

behaviors in organizational settings. Academy of

Management Review, 13(4), 572-587.

Lin, N. (2001a). Guanxi: A conceptual analysis. In A.

Y. So, N. Lin, & D. Poston (Eds.), The Chinese

triangle of mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong

(pp.153-166). Westport: Greenwood Press.

Lin, N. (2001b). Social capital: a theory of social

structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The

measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech

Monographs, 41(3), 261-266.

Pandey, J. (1981). Ingratiation tactics in India. The

Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 147-148.

Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: its origins and

applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of

Sociology, 24, 1-24.

Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic

traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton

University Press.

Ralston, D. A. (1985). Employee ingratiation: The role

of management. Academy of Management Review,

10(3), 477-487.

Rao, A., Schmidt, S. M., & Murray, L. H. (1995). Upward

impression management: Goals, inf luence

strategies, and consequences. Human Relations, 48

(4), 147-167.

Singh, V., Kumra, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2002). Gender

and impression management: Playing the promotion

game. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 77-89.

Spencer-Oatey, H., & Ng, P. (2001). Reconsidering

Chinese modesty: Hong Kong and mainland Chinese

evaluative judgments of compliment responses.

Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 11(2), 181-

201.

Strutton, D., Pelton, L. E., & Lumpkin, J. R. (1995).

Sex differences in ingratiatory behavior: An

investigation of influence tactics in the salesperson-

customer dyad. Journal of Business Research, 34,

35-45.

Strutton, D., Pelton, L. E., & Tanner, J. F. (1996). Shall

we gather in the garden: The effect of ingratiatory

behaviors on buyer trust in salespeople. Industrial

Marketing Management, 25(3), 151-162.

Tedeschi, J. T., & Melburg, V. (1984). Impression

management and influence in the organization. In

S. B. Bacharach & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Research in

sociology of organization (Vol. 3, pp. 31-58).

Greenwich: JAI Press.

Tsang, K. K. (2009). Ingratiation among Hong Kong

youth. International Journal of Adolescence and

Youth, 15, 277-288.

Varma, A, Toh, S. M., & Pichler, S. (2006). Ingratiation

in job applications: Impact on selection decisions.

Journal of Management Psychology, 21(3), 200-210.

Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Sparrowe, R. T. (1994).

Developing leader-member exchanges: The

influence of gender and ingratiation. American

Behavioral Scientist, 37(5), 697-714.

Yang, K. S. (1995). Chinese social orientation: An

integrative analysis. In T. Y. Lin, S. T. Wen, & E. K.

Yeh (Eds.), Chinese societies and mental health (pp.

19-39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Page 14: The Impacts of Ingratiation on Interpersonal Attraction

Copyright of Journal of Youth Studies (10297847) is the property of The Hong Kong Federation of Youth

Groups and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the

copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for

individual use.