the interagency fuels treatment decision support system ... · overview of presentation ... data...
TRANSCRIPT
The Interagency Fuels Treatment Decision
J h Ci l H Mi h l R h Ti S db
Support System (IFT-DSS)
John Cissel, H. Michael Rauscher, Tim SwedbergJoint Fire Science Program
Tami Funk, Stacy Drury, Neil Wheeler Sonoma Technology IncSonoma Technology, Inc.
Petaluma, California
Erik ChristiansenFuel Management Committee, National Wildfire Coordinating Group
Brad HarwoodUSDA, Forest Service
Overview of Presentation
• Brief introduction and backgroundBrief introduction and background• What does IFT-DSS do for users?
H i IFT DSS l t d t th t ?• How is IFT-DSS related to other systems?• The stakeholder operational environment• The emerging vision for Fire Software
Systemsy
2
Current Condition: Fuels Treatment CommunityCommunity
Fuels treatment planners have a needand they use what they know Governance & IT and they use what they know community missing
U i l t d fUsers are isolated from each other
Tools are isolated from each other
Developers are isolated from each other
33
Scientists and data providers create tools
Tools are isolated from each other
Current State of the Fuels Treatment SoftwareSoftware
• Currently an assortment of data softwareCurrently an assortment of data, software applications and systems
Over 400 software tools of all typesN t ll ibl t th itNot all are accessible to the community Most are problem-specific Some are comprehensive but only support specific data and use-casessupport specific data and use cases It is difficult to “string” them together Not always supported
4
Survey of Fuels Treatment Specialists
• What does this mean for the userWhat does this mean for the user community?
Users use what they know Users use what they know Use tools that are user-friendly, simple May not know that other tools exist Limited guidance on which to use
Summary of Survey Respondents
Bureau of Land
~90%
nden
ts
~90%
nden
ts
A lot of time is spent “stringing” tools together for specific purposesA lot of time is spent acquiring and preparing data
National Park Service
13
Bureau of Land Management
11
~10 20%
~20-50%
Perc
ent o
f Res
pon
~10 20%
~20-50%
Perc
ent o
f Res
pon
preparing dataFish & Wildlife
4
Forest Service 19BEHAVE FOFEM, FIREFAMILY+,
FARSITE, FLAMMAP,FMA+, FVS/FFE,
RERAP, NEXUS,CONSUME, FRCC,SIS, FFI/Firemon,
~10-20%PBEHAVE FOFEM, FIREFAMILY+,
FARSITE, FLAMMAP,FMA+, FVS/FFE,
RERAP, NEXUS,CONSUME, FRCC,SIS, FFI/Firemon,
BEHAVE FOFEM, FIREFAMILY+,FARSITE, FLAMMAP,
FMA+, FVS/FFE,
RERAP, NEXUS,CONSUME, FRCC,SIS, FFI/Firemon,
~10-20%PIFT-DSS must facilitate the most
difficult and time consumingTotal Responses = 47 LANDFIRE data,
ArcGISWIMS data,
Google EarthLANDFIRE data,
ArcGISWIMS data,
Google EarthLANDFIRE data,
ArcGISWIMS data,
Google Earth
gtasks to ensure success
5
Current State of the Fuels Treatment CommunityCommunity
• What about the existing comprehensiveWhat about the existing comprehensive systems that “string” models together?
ArcFuels, INFORMS, LANDFIRE-IFP, StarFire, OptFuels = VERY USEFUL SCIENCE
Some are agency specific- Some are agency specific- Some require “expert” knowledge- Do not address all fuels treatmentuse cases
User groups are smallDo not facilitate collaboration with each otherNot SOA frameworks designed for expansionNot SOA frameworks designed for expansion
User designed custom analyses not supported
6
Software Tools and Systems (STS) Study Strategic Assessment Phase IStrategic Assessment - Phase I
Software Engineering Instituteperformed strategic analysis ofp g y
problem space
Outcomes:Web-based SOA framework(s) needed( )BlueSky on right track Data not available to select “best” modelsInvolve user, developer, governance, IT communities throughoutAligned with NWCG NWFEA
STS Study – Phase I
Aligned with NWCG NWFEAFuels planning focus for further exploration
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar2007 2008 2009
February 2007 February 2008
7
yInitiation of
Phase I of theSTS Study
yConclusion ofPhase I of the
STS Study
Interagency Fuels Treatment Decision Support System (IFT-DSS) Design -
Phase IISoftware
IFT-DSSArchitecture
Design
Sonoma Technology, Inc.
Interagency fuels team
IFT-DSSConceptual
Design
Current Practices& Needs Assessment
Fuels Treatment Planning Decision Support Process
Define project, vegetation data,landscape and scale
Define projectanalysis
Retrievevegetation,
geophysical,& weather data
Generatesummaryreports
Definearea of interest
(AOI)
View/manipulatedata as needed
Fuels Treatment Planning Decision Support Process
Define project, vegetation data,landscape and scale
Define projectanalysis
Retrievevegetation,
geophysical,& weather data
Generatesummaryreports
Definearea of interest
(AOI)
Definearea of interest
(AOI)
View/manipulatedata as neededView/manipulatedata as needed
ArchitectureStudy Graphical User Interface
(User Interaction)
Control Database(Business Process Control)
Dispatcher(Business Process Management & Information Flow)
Data and Software Services(Business Services)
Geospatial Database(Data Storage and Access Service)
Graphical User Interface(User Interaction)
Graphical User Interface(User Interaction)
Control Database(Business Process Control)
Control Database(Business Process Control)
Dispatcher(Business Process Management & Information Flow)
Dispatcher(Business Process Management & Information Flow)
Data and Software Services(Business Services)
Data and Software Services(Business Services)
Geospatial Database(Data Storage and Access Service)
Geospatial Database(Data Storage and Access Service)
Interagency fuels team
Document
Design treatment strategies
Simulate & analyzefire behavior
Current year datapreparation & quality control
Simulate alternateweather
scenario(s)
= human mediated action
Simulate vegetation,geophysical, and fuel conditions
landscape, and scale
Analyze fire effectsand/or risk
Simulate & analyzefire behavior
Treelistdata
LANDFIREdata
View/assessvegetation
data
Update treelistdata (FFE-FVS)
Imputationanalysis
ConsiderDisturbance
Updatedvegetation
data Prepare data forinput to fire behavior
model
Generatesummaryreports
UpdateLANDFIRE data
View/assessoutputdata
Generatesummaryreports
View/assessoutputdata
Meets geophysical,sociological, ecological
target conditions?
YESAnalysis complete
generate finaldocumentation
Performbenefit/lossrisk analysis Identify/prioritize
treatmentareas
Develop compositeindex of values
affected
Generatesummaryreports
Inputvalues at
risk
Selecttreatment
areas
Selecttreatments
to apply
FFE-FVS
FCCS
Simulate post-treatment vegetation
and fuels data
Manualadjustment
FFE-FVS
FCCS
Generatesummaryreports
NO
Design treatment strategies
Simulate & analyzefire behavior
Current year datapreparation & quality control
Simulate alternateweather
scenario(s)
= human mediated action
Simulate vegetation,geophysical, and fuel conditions
landscape, and scale
Analyze fire effectsand/or risk
Simulate & analyzefire behavior
Treelistdata
Treelistdata
LANDFIREdata
LANDFIREdata
View/assessvegetation
data
View/assessvegetation
data
Update treelistdata (FFE-FVS)
Imputationanalysis
ConsiderDisturbance
Updatedvegetation
data
Updatedvegetation
data Prepare data forinput to fire behavior
model
Generatesummaryreports
UpdateLANDFIRE data
UpdateLANDFIRE data
View/assessoutputdata
View/assessoutputdata
Generatesummaryreports
View/assessoutputdata
View/assessoutputdata
Meets geophysical,sociological, ecological
target conditions?
YESAnalysis complete
generate finaldocumentation
Performbenefit/lossrisk analysis
Performbenefit/lossrisk analysis Identify/prioritize
treatmentareas
Identify/prioritizetreatment
areas
Develop compositeindex of values
affected
Develop compositeindex of values
affected
Generatesummaryreports
Inputvalues at
risk
Inputvalues at
risk
Selecttreatment
areas
Selecttreatment
areas
Selecttreatments
to apply
Selecttreatments
to apply
FFE-FVS
FCCS
Simulate post-treatment vegetation
and fuels data
Simulate post-treatment vegetation
and fuels data
Manualadjustment
Manualadjustment
FFE-FVS
FCCS
Generatesummaryreports
NO
STS Study – Phase II
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar2007 2008 2009
June 2008 March 2009
8
Initiation ofPhase II of the
STS Study
Conclusion ofPhase II of the
STS Study
IFT-DSS Proof of Concept Contract -Phase IIIPhase III
IFT-DSS v 0.1.0 IFT-DSS v 0.3.0
May June July August September October November December January February March April May2009 2010
GUI k Savannah IFT DSS 0 2 0GUI mock-ups Fire Congress IFT-DSS v 0.2.0
9
Phase IV: System Development IFT DSS v 0 4IFT-DSS v 0.4
• Focus on transitioning proof-of-conceptFocus on transitioning proof of concept architecture to full system architecture
• Expand prescribed burn functionalityExpand prescribed burn functionality– Expanded FlamMap capability– Inclusion of FOFEM– FCCS surface fire behavior– Variable wind analysis– Burn plan documentation support– Burn plan documentation support
• User feedback from IFTDSS version 0.3• Strategic planning (spatial) functionality• Strategic planning (spatial) functionality
from version 0.3
Phase IV: System DevelopmentIFTDSS Version 1 0IFTDSS Version 1.0
January February March April May JuneJanuary February March April May June
Prescribed burn plan work flow
Integration of FCCS, Consume, and FEPSg , ,Data acquisition and preparation work flow
Acquire, view, and edit LANDFIRE data Integration of NIFFT tool functionality FCCS fuelbed editor Ability to overlay GIS layers (i.e., values at risk, etc.) FireFamily+
Strategic planning work flowStrategic planning work flow
Integration of FlamMap MTT (fire spread and direction) Simulate fire effects with FOFEM
Risk assessment work flowRisk assessment work flow
Ability to input values at risk functions Assessment of current conditions
Phase IV: System DevelopmentIFTDSS Version 2 0IFTDSS Version 2.0
Data acq isition and preparation ork flo
July 2011 June 2012
Data acquisition and preparation work flow
Acquire and edit treelist data; perform imputation; growth simulation (FVS)
Integration of FARSITEStrategic planning work flow
Integration of FARSITE
Ability to identify project areas and treatment units Ability to assign treatments in space and time
Spatially explicit fuels treatment assignment work flow
Ability to assign treatments in space and time Ability to simulate treatment results
Ability to choose vegetation types and establish treatment typesFuels treatment effectiveness over time work flow
y g yp yp Ability to input fuel moistures and other weather variables Ability to simulate results over time using FVS-FFE
Risk assessment work flow Ability to assign fuels treatments (simulation of vegetation needed) Ability to analyze the impact of treatments Ability to iterate treatment options until desired results are achieved
Overview of Presentation
• Brief introduction and backgroundBrief introduction and background• What does IFT-DSS do for users?
H i IFT DSS l t d t th t ?• How is IFT-DSS related to other systems?• The stakeholder operational environment• The emerging vision for Fire Software
Systemsy
13
Work Flow Scenarios
• Data acquisition and preparation• Strategic planning• Spatially explicit fuels treatment
assignment• Fuels treatment over time• Prescribed burn planning• Risk assessment• User defined (custom)• User-defined (custom)
1
Refined Work Flow Scenarios and Proposed Proof of Concept System Functionality for the IFT-DSS; Drury et al., 2009(http://frames.nbii.gov/ift-dss)
Analysis flowy
1) Define project, vegetation, scale2) Prepare and ensure quality of vegetation data) epa e a d e su e qua ty o egetat o data3) Simulate and analyze fire behavior4) Analyze fire effects and/or fire risk5) Design treatment strategies6) Simulate treated vegetation as well as
geophysical and fuel conditions7) Simulate treatment effectiveness in reducing
fi b h i d fi ff t t ti lfire behavior and fire effects potentials
1
Fuels Treatment Planning Decision Support Process
Define project, vegetation data,landscape, and scale
Define projectanalysis
Retrievevegetation,
geophysical,& weather data
Generatesummaryreports
Definearea of interest
(AOI)
View/manipulatedata as needed
Fuels Treatment Planning Decision Support Process
Define project, vegetation data,landscape, and scale
Define projectanalysis
Retrievevegetation,
geophysical,& weather data
Generatesummaryreports
Definearea of interest
(AOI)
Definearea of interest
(AOI)
View/manipulatedata as neededView/manipulatedata as needed
Treelistdata
LANDFIREdata
View/assessvegetation
data
Update treelistdata (FFE-FVS)
Imputationanalysis
ConsiderDisturbance
Updatedvegetation
data Prepare data for
Generatesummaryreports
U d t
Treelistdata
Treelistdata
LANDFIREdata
LANDFIREdata
View/assessvegetation
data
View/assessvegetation
data
Update treelistdata (FFE-FVS)
Imputationanalysis
ConsiderDisturbance
Updatedvegetation
data
Updatedvegetation
data Prepare data for
Generatesummaryreports
U d tU d t
Simulate & analyzefire behavior
Current year datapreparation & quality control
input to fire behaviormodel
UpdateLANDFIRE data
View/assessoutputdata
GeneratesummaryreportsSimulate & analyze
fire behavior
Current year datapreparation & quality control
input to fire behaviormodel
UpdateLANDFIRE data
UpdateLANDFIRE data
View/assessoutputdata
View/assessoutputdata
Generatesummaryreports
Simulate alternateweather
scenario(s)Simulate & analyzefire behavior
View/assessoutputdata
Meets geophysical,sociological, ecological
target conditions?
YESAnalysis complete
generate finaldocumentation
Generate
Inputvalues at
risk NO
Simulate alternateweather
scenario(s)Simulate & analyzefire behavior
View/assessoutputdata
View/assessoutputdata
Meets geophysical,sociological, ecological
target conditions?
YESAnalysis complete
generate finaldocumentation
Generate
Inputvalues at
risk
Inputvalues at
risk NO
Analyze fire effectsand/or risk
Performbenefit/lossrisk analysis Identify/prioritize
treatmentareas
Develop compositeindex of values
affected
summaryreports
risk NO
Analyze fire effectsand/or risk
Performbenefit/lossrisk analysis
Performbenefit/lossrisk analysis Identify/prioritize
treatmentareas
Identify/prioritizetreatment
areas
Develop compositeindex of values
affected
Develop compositeindex of values
affected
summaryreports
riskrisk NO
Design treatment strategies
Selecttreatment
areas
Selecttreatments
to apply
FFE-FVS
FCCS
Simulate post-t t t t ti
FFE-FVS Generatesummary
Design treatment strategies
Selecttreatment
areas
Selecttreatment
areas
Selecttreatments
to apply
Selecttreatments
to apply
FFE-FVS
FCCS
Simulate post-t t t t ti
Simulate post-t t t t ti
FFE-FVS Generatesummary
= human mediated action
Simulate vegetation,geophysical, and fuel conditions
treatment vegetationand fuels data
Manualadjustment FCCS
reports
= human mediated action
Simulate vegetation,geophysical, and fuel conditions
treatment vegetationand fuels data
treatment vegetationand fuels data
Manualadjustment
Manualadjustment FCCS
reports
16
Overview of Presentation
• Brief introduction and backgroundBrief introduction and background• What does IFT-DSS do for users?
H i IFT DSS l t d t th t ?• How is IFT-DSS related to other systems?• The stakeholder operational environment• The emerging vision for Fire Software
Systemsy
17
Many Systems - Little Interaction
Fuels Systems ReportingSystems
Non-FuelsS tSOA Web-based
EMDS/HFPAS
Systems Systems
FPA FPAiRWin
SOA Web based
National
Regional NFPORS
Others
WFDSSBLUESKY
Regional
Sub-Regional
Project Level
IFP LANDFIRE
IFT-DSS
Base Models & DataStand alone
Project Level
RegionalFl M LANDFIREIFP-LANDFIRE
StarFireINFORMSARCFUELSOptFuels
Sub-Regional
P j t L l
FlamMapFOFEMCONSUMEFVS/FFENEXUS
LANDFIREWIMSFFI/FIREMONFSVegFAMWEBOptFuels
SFRASProject Level FMA+
FireFamily+…….
…….
18
Overview of Presentation
• Brief introduction and backgroundBrief introduction and background• What does IFT-DSS do for users?
H i IFT DSS l t d t th t ?• How is IFT-DSS related to other systems?• The stakeholder operational environment• The emerging vision for Fire Software
Systemsy
19
Success requires stakeholder cooperation
Fire and Fuel
q p
Fire and Fuel Operations Managers
(Users)
I t F l
Scientist Developers
(Service Providers)
Governance through
Agency Senior Management
includingN W C G Interagency Fuel
Treatment Decision Support System
Coordination Team(Coordinators)
Providers)N W C G(Leaders)
DatabaseStewards
InformatiionTechnologists
(Service Providers)
gand Software
Managers(Enablers)
20
Every stakeholder group must have rewards IFT DSS can:rewards, IFT-DSS can:
• Advantages for Fire & Fuel Operations ManagersUniversal access and version control through the Internet– Universal access and version control through the Internet
– Easy access to the necessary available data– Choice of software tools from a common interface– Easy setups for the most common analysesEasy setups for the most common analyses– Custom solutions for advanced users for unique situations– A single Graphical User Interface to master
• Advantages for Scientist Developers– Provides developers with software-software communications
standards– Allows developers to improve functionality behind the scenes– Provides developers instant access to a large user community– Reduces the cost of developing and fielding software tools
U t t ti ll t t d l i di ll– Useage reports automatically sent to developers periodically
21
Every stakeholder group must have rewards IFT DSS can:rewards, IFT-DSS can:
• Advantages for the IT/Software ManagersEnsures that security requirements are met– Ensures that security requirements are met
– Ensures that agency IT policy has been followed– Databases of record are actually used
• Advantages for the Governance Community (NWCG+)– Organizes all fuels management software services into a single
SOA system making supervision manageabley g p g– Enables informed management decisions on funding, expansion
of functions, and prioritization of effort– Enhances ability to provide guidance on process and quality
controlcontrol– Increases agency operating capabilities by focusing scarce
resources on high priority functions
22
A communications strategy is crucial to a building a good stakeholder communitybuilding a good stakeholder community
Late Majority800
Awareness
UnderstandingEarly Majority
100
Early Adopters
Trial Use
Adoptiony p
44
Innovators 13
23
Test User Group (1 of 2)pDemographics
• Multi-agency representation• Geographic representation
IFT-DSS Test User Group Population
60
30
40
50
er o
f Tes
t Use
rs
0
10
20
09 ne uly ust ber
ber
ber
ber
ary ary
ch
pril 10
Num
be
May-09 June July
Augus
Septem
be
Octobe
Novem
be
Decem
be
Janu
ary
Februa
ry
March
Apr
May-10
Time
24
Test User Group (2 of 2)p
25
Overview of Presentation
• Brief introduction and backgroundBrief introduction and background• What does IFT-DSS do for users?
H i IFT DSS l t d t th t ?• How is IFT-DSS related to other systems?• The stakeholder operational environment• The emerging vision for Fire Software
Systemsy
26
Current Condition: Fuels Treatment CommunityCommunity
Fuels treatment planners have a needand they use what they know Governance & IT and they use what they know community missing
U i l t d fUsers are isolated from each other
Tools are isolated from each other
Developers are isolated from each other
227
Scientists and data providers create tools
Tools are isolated from each other
Vision for the Fuels Treatment CommunityCommunity
IFT‐DSS Framework Architecture:
Single interface, multiple tools, ce g , p ,data transformations, web‐based
New tools are coded gove
rnan
c
as IFT-DSS services & linked with wrapped tools
nolo
gy &
g
Legacy tools are “wrapped” with a
standard interfaceatio
n te
ch
standard interface
Info
rm
28Scientists and data providers create tools
Vision for the Fire and Fuels Community ce
Linked integratedgo
vern
anc
System‐to‐system interoperability
integrated framework architectures,e.g., IFT‐DSS, l k
nolo
gy &
g
interoperability standards
BlueSky, WFDSS
atio
n te
chIn
form
29
Library of common services
Help us develop IFT-DSSp p
• Review the documentation published by p ythe IFT-DSS project on the web:
– http://frames.nbii.gov/ift-dss
• Contact: Mike Rauscher– Email: [email protected]