the lisbon barometer

29
B l u e S k i e s W i n d s o f C h a n g e C h a n c e o f S h o w e r s S t o r m y T i m e s A h e a d LISBON AGENDA BAROMETER: Measuring the Lisbon Agenda Goals

Upload: paul-healy

Post on 29-Mar-2016

227 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

With both the eurozone and the UK now entering a recession, the moment could hardly be more timely to examine how much progress has been made since our last report. In this new project - the Lisbon Barometer - the Stockholm Network has statistically measured the specific effects of the Lisbon Agenda reform effort and subsequently outlines policy recommendations based on these measures. By using nineteen statistical categories – some used by the European Commission itself and some picked to supplement the Commission`s measures – covering both standard and less traditional areas of innovation and competition, the Barometer monitors and ranks the progress of nine EU countries towards meeting the specific and general goals of the original Lisbon Agenda of 2000 and the more recent Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs.

TRANSCRIPT

This is not a page - please crop 144mm of the topof the pdf off before sending

B

lue S

kies

Win

ds o

f Change Chance of Show

ers Stormy Tim

es Ahead

LISBON AGENDA BAROMETER:Measuring the Lisbon Agenda Goals

IntroductionIn keeping with our core mission of promotingmarket-oriented reform in Europe, theStockholm Network has been keeping a closeeye on the EU’s Lisbon Agenda with a series of publications aimed at giving these goals acloser look to see if they are having any successin improving Europe’s prosperity.

The first paper in the Lisbon series waspublished in autumn 2007. Beyond Lisbon:Reviewing EU policies on IP, Competition andInnovation evaluated the EU’s intellectualproperty, competition and innovation policies by looking at four broad mechanisms the EUeither used or wished to develop to set policyin the following four areas: the Lisbon Agenda’sbroad policy goals; the creation of a EuropeanResearch Area; competition and anti-trust policyunder Article 82 of the EC Treaty; and,

intellectual and industrial property. BeyondLisbon provided a holistic assessment of theEU’s achievements within these policy areas and made recommendations on how it couldimprove its performance and reach its statedgoals. One of its key conclusions was that the Lisbon Agenda could only ever hope tosucceed if it focused on a narrower, moretargeted set of goals.

With both the UK and eurozone entering arecession, the moment could hardly be moretimely to examine how much progress hasbeen made since our last report. In this newproject - the Lisbon Barometer - the StockholmNetwork sets out to statistically measure thespecific effects of the Lisbon Agenda reformeffort and to outline policy recommendationsbased on these measures. By using nineteen

statistical categories – some used by theEuropean Commission itself and some pickedto supplement the Commission’s measures –covering both standard and less traditional areasof innovation and competition, the Barometermonitors and ranks the progress of nine EUcountries towards meeting the specific andgeneral goals of the original Lisbon Agenda of 2000 and the more recent Lisbon Strategyfor Growth and Jobs.

The Lisbon Agenda Barometer is combined with a discussion paper – Explaining the LisbonBarometer which analyses the successes andfailures of the EU in meeting its Lisbon Agendaobjectives, according to the Barometer’s findings.It also makes policy recommendations aimed atachieving the goals of the Lisbon Agenda. Boththe Barometer and the accompanying discussion

paper provide a platform from which theLisbon Agenda can take the final steps awayfrom its origins as a grand political project, toone of practical public policy with real results.

PAGE 1

Fuelling Ideas

0

1

2

3

4

5

2.15

0.91

2.45

4.25

*

1.82

1.05

1.83

1.41

0.37

1.86

3.02

**

2.65

**

2.12

1.16

2.51

3.82

1.72

1.1*

**

1.88

1.59

0.46

1.84

3.13

2.68

Franc

eSp

ain

German

y

Swed

en

The N

ether

lands Ita

ly UK

Slove

niaEU

27

Roman

iaJap

an US

Lisbon Agenda Target

2000

2006

KEY

Fuelling Ideas

Big SpendersGross Domestic Expenditure on R&D as % of GDP, 2000 & 2006

*Data from 2001 **Data from 1999 ***Data from 2005Source: Eurostat

PAGE 3

Gro

ss d

omes

tic e

xpen

ditu

re o

n R&

D a

s %

of G

DP

0

20

40

60

80

100 10.7 11 2.8 12 12.3

23 11.5 7 10.5 7.8 8.2

37.6 41

30.4

23 23 36.2

32.8

30

4934.6

17.7 30.4

Franc

eSp

ain

German

y

Swed

en*

The N

ether

lands

* UK

Slove

niaEU

27

Roman

ia

Japan

*US*

51.748

66.865

51.1

44.2

58.5

44

54.9

74.5

61.4

Fuelling Ideas

Knowledge SeekersPercentage of Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D by Public and Private Sources, 2004

*Data from 2003Source: Eurostat

Other

Public

Private

KEY

% o

f gro

ss d

omes

tic e

xpen

ditu

re o

n R&

D

PAGE 4

0

5

10

15

20

Italy

Swed

en

Nether

lands UK

Franc

e

German

yJap

an US

1 1

2

3

4

6

10

18

Fuelling Ideas

R&D ChampionsNumber of Companies in the Global Top 50 by Total R&D Investment, 2006

Source: Department for Trade and Industry, The R&D Scoreboard, 2006

No.

of C

ompa

nies

PAGE 5

Innovation and Exploitation

Japan 28.83

US 30.96

Other 15.48

Fran

ce 4

.66

Ger

man

y 11.

85

Spain

0.3

8

Sweden 1.23

The Netherlands 2.24

Italy 1.35

UK 3

Slovenia 0.018Romania 0.006

Innovation and Exploitation

Innovation Nation: Patent IntensityPercentage Share of Total Triadic Patent Families*, 2005

*Data refers to patents applied for at the EPO, USPTO and JPOSource: OECD Patent Database, 2007

Percentage Share of Total Triadic Patent families PAGE 7

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400Romania

Slovenia

Spain

ItalyThe NetherlandsUnited States

JapanFrance

EU 27GermanyUKSweden

2000

2001

2002 20

0320

04

Year 2000 Figure

Innovation and Exploitation

Innovation Nation: Patent ActivityIncrease In Patenting Activity*, 2000–2005

*Data refer to applications filed directly under the European Patent Convention or toapplications filed under the Patent Co-operation Treaty and designated to the EPO(Euro-PCT). Patent applications are counted according to the year in which they werefiled at the EPO and are broken down according to the International PatentClassification (IPC). They are also broken down according to the inventor’s place ofresidence, using fractional counting if multiple inventors or IPC classes are provided toavoid double counting. Source: Eurostat

% In

crea

se in

pat

entin

g ac

tivity

Year PAGE 8

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Franc

eSp

ain

German

y

Swed

en

The N

ether

lands Ita

ly UK

Slove

niaJap

an

Roman

ia US

0.24

0.04

0.18

0.97

0.67

0.04

0.55

0.03

0.00

8

0.35

0.42

Innovation and Exploitation

Reaping the Rewards of InnovationReceipts from Royalties and Licence Fees* as a Percentage of GDP, 2006

*Refers to all payments and receipts between residents and non-residents for theauthorised use of intangible, non-produced, non-financial assets and proprietary rights(patents, copyrights, trademarks, franchises, industrial processes) and for the use,through licensing agreements, of produced originals of prototypes (films, manuscripts).

Rece

ipts

from

roy

altie

s an

d lic

ence

fees

as

a %

of G

DP

PAGE 9

Innovation and Exploitation

Protecting Knowledge CreatorsSoftware Piracy Rates*, 2004

*Data refers to the number of pirated software units divided by the total number of units put into use Source: Business Software Alliance, 2006 Global Software Piracy Study

Softw

are

Pira

cy R

ate

(%)

PAGE 10

Franc

eSp

ain

German

y

Swed

en

The N

ether

lands Ita

ly UK

Slove

niaEU

27

Roman

iaJap

an US0

5

10

15

20

25

30

17.8

4

4.72

13.6

2

12.7

7

18.2

7

6.42

26.4

8

4.48

3.85

16.6

7

20.0

4

26.1

3

Innovation and Exploitation

Exporting IdeasExports of High Technology Products* as a % Share of Total Exports, 2006

*High technology products are defined as the sum of the following products:Aerospace, computers, office machinery, electronics, instruments, pharmaceuticals,electrical machinery and armaments. The total exports for the EU do not includeintra-EU trade.Source: Eurostat

Hig

h-te

ch e

xpor

ts a

s %

sha

re o

f tot

al e

xpor

ts

PAGE 11

Business Environment

France 8

Netherlands 11

Romania 11

Italy 13

Sweden 16

UK 18

Germany 24

Spain 47

Slovenia 60

US 5

Japan 31

Business Environment

Who wants to be an Entrepreneur? How long will it take?Time required to set up a business

Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators, 2006

Number of days required to set up a business PAGE 13

Sweden 3

Romania 5

UK 6

France 7

The Netherlands 7

Germany 9

Italy 9

Slovenia 9

Spain 10

US 5

Japan 11

Business Environment

Who wants to be an Entrepreneur? How much red tape will I encounter?Number of procedures required for starting a business

*Data refers to the number of procedures required to start a business, includinginteractions required to obtain necessary permits and licenses and to complete allinscriptions, verifications, and notifications to start operations. Data are for businesseswith specific characteristics of ownership, size, and type of production.Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators, 2006

Number of procedures required for starting a business PAGE 14

40

60

80

100

70.9

86.1

77.1

88.2

95

88.3

73.7

92.1

74.2

94.3 94.5

Franc

eSp

ain

German

y

Swed

en

The N

ether

lands Ita

ly UK

Slove

niaJap

an

Roman

ia US

Business Environment

Business-Friendly DestinationsBusiness Freedom Rating*

*Business freedom is a measure of how free entrepreneurs are to start businesses,how easy it is to obtain licenses, and how easy it is to close a business.Source: Kane, T., Holmes, K.R. And O’Grady, M.O., Index of Economic Freedom, Heritage Foundation 2007

Busin

ess

Free

dom

Rat

ing

PAGE 15

0 2 4 6 8 101 3 5 7 9

7.3

6.7

7.8

9.3

9

5.2

8.4

6.6

3.7

7.5

7.2

Franc

e

Spain

German

ySw

eden

The N

ether

lands

Italy

UKSlo

venia

Japan

Roman

ia

US

Business Environment

Clean or Corrupt?Corruption Perception Rating*

*Corruption perception relates to perceptions of the degree of corruption as seen by business people and country analysts, and ranges between 10 (highly clean) and 0 (highly corrupt).Source: Corruption Perception Index, Transparency International, 2006

Cor

rupt

ion

Perc

eptio

n Ra

ting

Highly CleanHighly Corrupt PAGE 16

Small is Beautiful

0

20

40

60

80

100

43.3

73**

38.3**

99.6**

45**

77.8***

73.8

45.6***

18.1

44.7

20

Franc

eSp

ain

German

y

Swed

en

The N

ether

lands Ita

ly UK

Slove

niaJap

an

Roman

ia US

Small is Beautiful

It’s a Small WorldNumber of Small and Medium Enterprises* (SMEs) per 1000 Population, 2004

*SMEs are businesses that may be defined by the number of employees. There is nostandard international definition. In this instance the definition varies. i.e. 1–499employees in the US, 1–199 employees in Sweden, 0–249 employees in all otherEU countries and 1–299 employees in Japan

**Data from 2005***Data from 2003

Source: Kozek, M., Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises: A Collection of PublishedData, International Finance Corporation, Jan. 26 2007

SMEs

per

100

0 po

pula

tion

PAGE 18

0

20

40

60

80

100

Franc

e

German

y

Swed

en

The N

ether

lands Ita

ly UK

Slove

nia USJap

an

62.7

70.4

39.3

58.5

73

39.5

64.1

88

50.1

Small is Beautiful

Size MattersEmployment by SMEs*, 2000-2004

*Data from the most recent year available. In this instance SME refers to all businesses with 0-249 employeesSource: World Bank, World Development Indicators, 2006

Empl

oym

ent

by S

MEs

as

a %

of t

otal

em

ploy

men

t*

PAGE 19

53.7

68.1

56.5

60.4

70.3

50.7

44.5

Roman

ia

Franc

eSp

ain

Swed

en

The N

ether

lands Ita

ly UK 0

20

40

30

10

80

70

60

50

Small is Beautiful

Acorns vs Oaks Value Added* to the Economy by SMEs**, 2004

*Value added represents the difference between the value of what is producedand intermediate consumption entering the production, less subsidies onproduction and costs, taxes and levies

**In this instance SME refers to all businesses with 0–249 employeesSource: Eurostat

Valu

e A

dded

by

SMEs

PAGE 20

Our Information Society

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Franc

e

Spain

German

y

Swed

enTh

e Neth

erlan

ds

Italy

UKSlo

venia

Japan

Roman

ia

US

414

336

500

756

682

501

628

476

208

587

630

50 people

KEY

Our Information Society

The World at Your FingertipsInternet users* per 1000 population, 2004

*Internet users are defined as people with access to the worldwide networkSource: World Bank, World Development Indicators, 2006

Internet users per 1000 population PAGE 22

0

50

100

150

200

Franc

eSp

ain

German

y

Swed

en

The N

ether

lands Ita

ly UK

Slove

niaJap

an

Roman

ia US

108.

1

80.9

83.7

152.

6

189.

4

81.7

102.

5

59.1

0.7

145.

8

129

Our Information Society

Life in the Fast LaneBroadband subscribers* per 1000 population, 2004

*Broadband subscribers refers to the total number of broadband subscribers with a digital subscriber line, cable modem, or other high-speed technologies.Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators, 2006

Broa

dban

d su

bscr

iber

s pe

r 10

00 p

opul

atio

n

PAGE 23

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

04 07 04 07 04 07 04 07 04 07 04 07 04 07 04 07

26**

*

25

33

39

46**

14**

22

13

3***

41

26

43

53 55

17

38

30

5

Franc

eSp

ain

German

y

Swed

en

The N

ether

lands Ita

ly UK

Slove

nia

Roman

ia

Our Information Society

Democracy: A Mouse Click Away?Use of E-Government*, 2004–2007

*Data refers to the percentage of individuals aged 16 to 74 who have used theInternet, in the last 3 months, for interaction with public authorities (i.e. having usedthe Internet for one or more of the following activities: obtaining information frompublic authorities web sites, downloading official forms, sending filled in forms).

**Data from 2005***Data from 2006

Source: Eurostat

% o

f pop

ulat

ion

usin

g e-

gove

rnm

ent

PAGE 24

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Franc

eSp

ain

German

y

Swed

en

The N

ether

lands Ita

ly UK

Slove

nia

Roman

ia

27 28

28

27

32

19

26

28

5

Our Information Society

Net ProductivityPercentage of individuals displaying internet skills*

*Internet skills refer to the ability to carry out one or more of the following computerrelated activities: using a mouse to launch programs such as an Internet browser orword processor; copying or moving a file or folder ; using copy or cut and paste toolsto duplicate or move information on screen; using basic arithmetic formulae to add,subtract, multiply or divide figures in a spreadsheet; compress files; write a computerprogram using a specialised programming language.Source: Eurostat

% o

f ind

ivid

uals

disp

layi

ng in

tern

et s

kills

PAGE 25

The Climate for Innovation

The Climate for Innovation*

*Calculation based on an overall ranking using a sample of the tables.

B

lue S

kies

Win

ds o

f Change Chance of Show

ers Stormy Tim

es Ahead

SWED

EN

NET

HER

LAN

DS

G

ERM

AN

Y

UK

FRANCE ITALY SLO

VENIA

SPAIN

ROMANIA

This is not a page - please crop 144mm of the topof the pdf off before sending

Stockholm Network35 Britannia Row, London N1 8QHUnited KingdomTel: (44) 207-354-8888Fax: (44) 207-359-8888E-mail: [email protected]: www.stockholm-network.org

All Rights Reserved. Without limiting the rightsunder copyright reserved above, no part of thispublication may be reproduced, stored orintroduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted,in any form or by any means (electronic,mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise)without the prior written permission of both thecopyright owner and the publisher of this book.

© Published by the Stockholm Network, 2008.