the national renal dataset charlie tomson ukrr annual meeting 24 th june 2009
TRANSCRIPT
The National Renal Dataset
Charlie Tomson
UKRR Annual Meeting
24th June 2009
The National Renal Dataset
• NRD applies to England only
• Designed to support implementation of NSF
• Initially designed to be collected through CfH systems
• Incorporates all items currently collected by UKT, BAPN, and UKRR, and some additional items
Evolution of the NRD
• Dataset items need to be approved as a ‘standard’ within the NHS
• Draft operational standard submission to Information Standards Board March 2007– Approved– Required evidence that additional data items
had been explicitly piloted
• Dataset Change Notice issued Dec 2008 by CfH on behalf of DH
Implementation testing
• Vascular access; Peritoneal access, Viral serology
• 3 systems (PROTON, Mediqal, Vitaldata)– Leeds, Bradford, Bristol, Exeter, Norwich,
Brighton, Derby
What the NRD is and is not
• IS – an ‘output specification’– Contains both items directly extracted from
the care record and items that can be derived after extraction
• NOT – a ‘technical specification’– Allows for collection in different IT systems– Does not predetermine the logical structure of
the database in a given IT system
What does ‘mandatory’ mean?
• For Trusts:– DH requirement that TRUSTS implement
systems that allow data collection and extraction
– And if necessary pay for software upgrades– Likely that failure to do so will (eventually)
result in sanctions (not defined)
• For UKRR/UKT:– Expectation that all new data items will be
analysed and reported
Which organisation collects which items?
• UKRR: all existing adult and paediatric items, plus vascular and peritoneal access, new prescribed items
• UKT: transplant-related items
• HES: administrative items (e.g. hospital stay)
Items dropped since DSCN
• Osteoporosis/DEXA scores
• Antihypertensive drug treatment
• Post-dialysis Hb and [creatinine]
• Malignancy EDTA code
• HbA1c and Albumin assay details
• Clinical trial status indicator (BAPN)
Administrative items
• Items currently held on Patient Administration Systems but not on renal systems, e.g. – Dates of admission and discharge– Consultant code– Dates of outpatient appointments
• To be collected (as at present) within HES• Record linkage by CSC – Information
Centre seeking permissions
Malignant disease
• Many malignancies in patients receiving RRT are diagnosed and managed in Trusts other than the renal centre
• Recording of malignancy within renal IT systems likely to remain incomplete and biased
• Continue to record h/o malignancy at start of RRT within renal IT systems
• Record linkage to National Cancer Intelligence Network (Cancer Registries) to be sought
Osteoporosis
• NRD not designed to drive clinical practice; use of DEXA scans variable
• Interpretation of DEXA scans difficult in kidney disease due to aortic calcification
• Incidence of fracture might be captured by record linkage with HES
• Plans to record diagnosis of osteoporosis and/or DEXA scores within mandatory NRD dropped
Antihypertensive drug Rx
• Would require either– Clinicians to enter yes/no (and keep updated),
or– Reliable recording of current prescribed
medications irrespective of where prescribed
• Unlikely to be feasible within current renal IT systems in adult practice
• Dropped from mandatory dataset
PD dose, transport characteristics
• Retained as mandatory items
• To be included in data extract from renal IT systems– Raw data rather than derived variables
required– Peritoneal Dialysis Database could be used to
populate data extract?
Items mandated from 2011
• Residual renal function, PD peritonitis, HD dialysate flow rate – UKRR
• Height and weight – UKRR
• HDL/LDL-C, red cell folate, TSAT, Alk Phos, etc - UKRR
• Smoking status – UKRR, UKT?
• Surgical procedures – HES
• Recurrent renal disease - UKT
Benefits for kidney patient care?
• Mandation = obligation on Trusts to support renal IT systems until such time that all data can be captured reliably within ‘main hospital’ systems
• More complete datasets = enhanced ability to perform valid case-mix adjusted analyses of variations in outcome
• Understanding of variation drives improvement
Thank you