the origins & evolution of genome complexity seth donoughe lynch & conery (2003)

28
The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

Post on 23-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

The origins & evolution of genome complexity

Seth Donoughe

Lynch & Conery (2003)

Page 2: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

Plan of attack

• Review simplified definitions for: genes, genome, mRNA, codons, introns/exons, transposons– Two-fold purpose

• Work through the data, discussing the theory along the way

Page 3: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

Gene: An inheritable sequence of DNA, which encodes one or more products.

Genome: All of the hereditary information encoded in an organism’s DNA

(contains all of its genes)

Page 4: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

DNA is transcribed into single-stranded mRNA.

(with A, U, G, and C as the nucleotides)

Each set of three nucleotides forms a codon.

Page 5: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

RNA polymerase

Page 6: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

The “canonical” genetic code. What are “silent sites”?

Page 7: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

mRNA is translated into a chain of amino acids = protein.

Page 8: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

Different kinds of diversity. How to infer about evolutionary past.

Increasing genome size

Page 9: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

Increasing genomic complexity in eukaryotes over evolutionary time.

1) Introns (and exons)

Page 10: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)
Page 11: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

Increasing genomic complexity in

eukaryotes over evolutionary time.

2) Transposons

Page 12: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

2) Transposons

Page 13: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

What caused this increase in genomic size and complexity?

• The evolution of single-celled eukaryotes and multicellularity brought:– Increased intracellular structural variety– Cell differentiation and specialization

Page 14: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

Perhaps genomic complexity evolved as a means to achieve this adaptive diversification.

Page 15: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

But there are problems with this hypothesis...

• Genomic complexity is not the only way to create different functions from the same genes

• Some (rare) prokaryotes are capable of cell differentiation with smaller genomes

• Increasingly long introns in some multicellular organisms and many transposons do not bring a clear functional advantage.

Page 16: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

Alternative hypothesis

“The transition from prokaryote to unicellular eukaryote to multicellular eukaryotes was associated with orders-of-magnitude reductions in population size”

Page 17: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

Alternative hypothesis

As population size decreased, genetic drift became an increasingly powerful factor in changing the features of the genome. Why?

Page 18: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

Genetic Drift

20 alleles

Initial freq. = 0.5

In general, alleles drift to fixation (frequency of 0 or 1) significantly faster in smaller populations.

N = 10

N = 100

Page 19: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

What is the [evolutionarily] meaningful size of a population?

• Abundance is a coarse measurement

• There is a broad trend:– Inverse relationship between population

density and the body mass of an individual

• We can do better with: – genetic effective population size.

Page 20: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

Effective population size (Ne)

• How “faithfully” gene frequencies are transmitted across generations.– Can be estimated from the rates of mutation at

silent sites (read: neutral mutations).

– # of neutral mutations = 4Neu

– Where u is the mutation rate per nucleotide

• We can roughly measure u independently for taxa, allowing us to estimate Ne

Page 21: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)
Page 22: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

How does smaller Ne lead to genome complexity?

• Gene duplication occurs at roughly the same rate (probably due to the same mechanism across all taxa) but …

• Duplicated genes are lost much more slowly in smaller populations

• Pairs of partially degenerated genes can fulfill a single function

Page 23: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)
Page 24: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

Duplication

• Duplicated genes can acquire new beneficial functions but the findings of this study indicate that this is unlikely to have been the driving cause behind increased genomic complexity.

Page 25: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

Increasing genomic complexity over evolutionary time

• Introns and exons– Origin unknown, probably in the single ancestor of

eukaryotes– Average of 4-7 introns per multicellular organism

gene– Average of 2 for unicellular eukaryote gene

• Virtually none has been found in prokaryotes

Page 26: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)
Page 27: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)
Page 28: The origins & evolution of genome complexity Seth Donoughe Lynch & Conery (2003)

Sources and image credits

• http://216.218.133.62/img/Pictures/codon_wheel.jpg• http://bioephemera.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/codon%5B1%5D.gif• http://undergrowth.org/system/files/images/tree-of-life-colour.preview.jpg• http://mgl.scripps.edu/people/goodsell/pdb/pdb40/1i6h-composite.gif• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Phylogenetic_tree.svg• http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/07/Gene.png• http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/17/Pre-mRNA_to_mRNA.png• http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fe/

PLoS_Mu_transposon_in_maize.jpg/491px-PLoS_Mu_transposon_in_maize.jpg• http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d4/Cell_differentiation.gif• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_drift