the republic of sierra leone constitutional review programme · the government of sierra leone to...

The Republic of Sierra Leone Constitutional Review Programme July 2013 – March 2015

of 45

United Nations Development Programme

Country: SIERRA LEONE

Project Document

Programme Title: The Republic of Sierra Leone Constitutional Review Programme (2013-2015)

UN TJV cluster 1 and 4: Support to Good Governance

UNDP CPD cluster 1: Improved Governance and Risk Management

UNDP Strategic plan Fostering Democratic Governance

Implementing Partner: UNDP Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone has made notable progress in consolidation of peace and democratic governance since the end of the 11-year civil war in 2002. This includes the successful administration of three elections, including a peaceful transfer of power in 2007 and peaceful presidential, parliamentary, and local council elections in 2012, with significantly less international involvement than the previous elections. However, a lot more remains to be done to address the underlying challenges in the country as well as to solidify democratic norms. The 2012 elections while hailed as a milestone in the country’s consolidation of democratic governance also demonstrated deep seated ethno-regional political factions – with several potential flashpoints that could lead to deterioration of social/political stability and the resumption of violence. The gains made are not yet irreversible and the situation remains fragile. Despite recent marked economic progress, young people – who constituted the majority of combatants during the civil conflict and now comprise almost 70% of the population – face a very high unemployment rate, which in turn poses a key challenge to the consolidation of peace. Such issues continue to colour the political and social life of the country, and need to be addressed, politically, legally and socially.

Sierra Leone currently operates on the basis of the 1991 Constitution. The Constitution signalled an end to one-party rule and ushered in a new political dispensation of multi-party democracy. However, the Constitution was endorsed three months after the civil war broke out. As part of the process of negotiating the end to the civil war, Article X of the July 1999 Lome Peace Accord provided for a review of the Constitution. Subsequently, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), established in 2002 also urged the Government of Sierra Leone to give “serious consideration” to the creation of a “new constitution”, in order to contribute to human rights. To that end, a broad ranging Constitutional Review Committee (CRC) representing different stakeholders in society, including political parties, democratic institutions, NGOs, the media and key independent bodies has been appointed. The 2013 CRC has been tasked with the reviewing of the 1991 Constitution. As part of its work it is envisaged that CRC will undertake a major civic education and consultation process, which will engage all segments of society in identifying recommendations for constitutional change. In accordance with the 1991 Constitution, at the conclusion of the process, Parliament will need to, pass a Bill after which a referendum will be held to approve the new Constitution.

This project, managed by UNDP and implemented in close cooperation with UNIPSIL and the Office of Attorney General, is expected to contribute to above stated objectives. The project represents an integrated UN initiative in support of the constitutional review process in Sierra Leone. The project serves as the overall substantive framework for the UN, with all actors contributing to the results as articulated in the document. By the project’s end, it is expected that the intended project output of Sierra Leone’s Constitutional Review Committee capacitated to expertly lead an inclusive, transparent, participatory and peaceful process of constitutional reform would have been achieved.

of 45

Programme Period: July 2013 - March 2015

Key Result Area : Inclusive Participation strengthened

Atlas Award ID: _________________________

Start date: July 2013

End Date: March 2015

LPAC Date:

Management UNDP Implementation

Total resources required: USD 4,132,487

Total allocated resources: USD ______________

Regular: USD ______________

Donor: USD ______________

Donor: USD ______________

Donor: UNDP USD 300,000.00

Government: USD 1,161,894.53

Funding Gap: USD 2,670,592.47

In-kind Contributions: USD ______________

For the Government of Sierra Leone: For UNDP:

Honourable Franklin Bai Kargbo Mr. Mohamed Abchir

Attorney General and Minister for Justice Country Director, a.i

Signature: --------------------------------------- Signature: --------------------------------------- Date: July 2013 Date: July 2013

of 45

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: SITUATION ANALYSIS

SECTION 2: PROJECT STRATEGY

SECTION 3: PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS

SECTION 4: RESULTS AND RESOURCES FRAMEWORK

SECTION 5: INDICATIVE BUDGET SHEET

SECTION 6: ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTATION TIMETABLE

SECTION 7: MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS

SECTION 8: MONITORING AND EVALUATION

SECTION 9: LEGAL CONTEXT

ANNEX 1. TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE CONSTITUTION REVIEW COMMITTEE (CRC)

ANNEX 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE

ANNEX 3. TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE CHIEF TECHNICAL ADVISOR (CTA)

ANNEX 4. RISK LOG

of 45

SECTION 1: SITUATION ANALYSIS

Background

Sierra Leone has made notable progress in consolidation of peace and democratic governance since the end of the 11-year civil war in 2002. This includes the successful administration of three elections, including a peaceful transfer of power in 2007 and peaceful presidential, parliamentary, and local council elections in 2012, with significantly less international involvement than the previous elections. However, the gains made are not yet irreversible and the situation remains fragile with a growing inter- and intra-party political polarization marked by regional and ethnic divisions. Despite major socio-economic progress, young people – who constituted the majority of combatants during the civil conflict and now comprise almost 70% of the population – face a very high unemployment rate, which in turn poses a key challenge to the consolidation of peace. Such issues continue to colour the political and social life of the country, and need to be addressed, politically, legally and socially.

Constitutional history

The country currently operates on the basis of the 1991 Constitution. The Constitution signalled an end to one-party rule and ushered in a new political dispensation of multi-party democracy. However, the Constitution was endorsed three months after the civil war broke out.1 As part of the process of negotiating the end to the civil war, Article X of the July 1999 Lome Peace Accord provided for an amendment of the Constitution. Subsequently, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), established in 2002 also urged the Government of Sierra Leone to give “serious consideration” to the creation of a “new constitution”, in order to contribute to human rights. It argued that such a new constitution “should be the product of a wide and thorough consultative and participatory programme. Such a constitution must lay the foundations for a democratic and open society in which every citizen is equally protected by the law. It must free the potential of every Sierra Leonean. A Sierra Leone that is united around clear constitutional rights, values and principles has a promising future”.

2

In line with the TRC recommendations, the government established a Constitutional Review Commission (CRC) on 11 January 2007 “to review the Sierra Leone Constitution of 1991 with a view to recommending amendments that might bring it up to date with the economic, social and political developments that have taken place nationally and internationally since 1991”. In its terms of reference, the CRC was asked to take into consideration the experiences gained in the implementation of the 1991 Constitution, any omissions and lacuna in the Constitution, and to make recommendations that may enhance democratic governance as well as consider possibility of making the provisions on the fundamental principles of State Policy justifiable.

The membership of the 2007 CRC was drawn from a wide spectrum of the society, and included professional associations, organized labour, market women, non-governmental organizations, Government nominees, political parties, as well as the Sierra Leone Judiciary, the Armed Forces and the Police. The CRC, which was chaired by the head of the Law Reform Commission, received submissions from social and traditional groups, political parties, the United Nations as well as concerned individuals. The CRC spent about two months discussing all articles of the Constitution before drafting a preliminary report which formed the basis of nation-wide consultations. The CRC also received written and oral representations

1 The current Constitution, which transformed Sierra Leone back into a multi-party state, was proposed following a three-month process of

reviewing the 1978, one-party constitution. 2 TRC Report Vol. 2, p122, paragraph 38

of 45

about different aspects of the Constitution, and made determinations on how to include them in a recommendation to the government. The result of the review process was a CRC Report, which was published in January 2008. However, the All Peoples Congress (APC), which succeeded the SLPP in September 2007, did not follow up on the report with either a White Paper responding to the recommendations or a constitutional amendment bill. The 2008 CRC Report has never been officially released to the public and as such, there has been no public debate on its recommendations.

Current constitutional process

In the course of the campaign for the 2012 elections, the current government promised a constitution review process. To that end, as at April 2013, the Attorney General and Minister of Justice was in the process of appointing a 80-member Constitutional Review Committee (CRC) representing different stakeholders in the country, including political parties, NGOs, the media and key independent bodies. The 2013 CRC will be tasked with reviewing of the 1991 Constitution.3 The Government envisages that there will be a major civic education and consultation process, which will engage all segments of society in identifying recommendations for constitutional change. In accordance with the 1991 Constitution, at the conclusion of the process, Parliament will need to endorse a set of recommendations for change, after which a referendum will be held to amend any entrenched clauses in the Constitution identified for reform.

There exists substantial agreement on many issues that require reform among the different parties and other stakeholders, including: (i) stronger economic and social rights; (ii) electoral reform to align the different election dates for presidential, parliamentary and local government elections, as well as census dates; and (iii) splitting the position of Attorney General and Minster of Justice. . This could make the work of the CRC more manageable. In any case, with the 2008 CRC Report in hand, the 2013 CRC already has a strong starting point to begin discussions with the community. More broadly, the review process offers an important platform to commence a process of robust civic education. This is important both as an end in itself, as well as a means for ensuring robust engagement with the constitutional process, which will lay the foundations for a more politically educated and informed populace capable of selecting good leadership and promoting peaceful and democratic conflict resolution.

However, there are risks that need to be addressed in order to ensure that the process does not trigger or exacerbate latent conflicts. A constitutional review process that is perceived as not inclusive or only for the political benefit of the ruling party carries risks, and could not only derail the process itself, but exacerbate ethno-regional political divisions and further polarize the country. This could detract from the ability of the constitutional review to be perceived as a “national project”. Another risk could emerge from the Parliament: if Parliament only engages with constitutional issues when a final constitutional amendment bill reaches Parliament, there is a risk that any social and political consensus that has been built by the CRC will be broken, which could in turn delegitimize the entire constitutional review process.

Current social and political context

A revised Constitution may be a mechanism for deliberating on strategies (both legal and policy) that could address some of the outstanding root causes of the devastating decade-long civil war. For example, according to the findings of the TRC report, weak governance institutions were unable to provide justice,

3 The CRC, though not fully constituted (about 20% of its eventual 60 members have not been named) is currently made up of representatives of political parties (6 each from APC and Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP) and 3 each from the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), Unity National People’s Party (UNPP), United Democratic Movement (UDM), Peace and Liberation Party (PLP), People’s Democratic Party (PDP), and People’s Movement for Democratic Change (PMDC)), representatives of national and governmental bodies (currently approximately 15-17 members from bodies such as the Law Reform Commission, National Commission for Persons with Disability, the Office of the Ombudsman, the Office of National Security, and the judiciary), and representatives of civil society.

of 45

security, and livelihoods, providing a context “conducive for the interplay of poverty, marginalisation, greed and grievances that caused and sustained the conflict.”4 In this context, the separation of powers was increasingly blurred, corruption was rampant, government elites were impervious to the needs of the people, and the police and other security institutions were weak. Constitutional reform could enhance the independence of the country’s major accountability institutions, including as the Police, the Political Parties Registration Commission, the National Electoral Commission, the Anti-Corruption Commission and the Independent Media Commission. It could also provide a venue for discussions around democracy and political accountability more generally, which could be useful in building the commitment of political elites and the public to a more meaningful multi-party, inclusive democracy.

The constitutional review process could also assist in the formulation of mechanisms to reduce the impact of ethnicity in the country’s elections, in particular, by exploring the option of returning to the proportional representation electoral system used in the 1996 and 2002 elections. The 2012 election results showed a continued divide along ethnic and regional lines. The Temne, Limba, Loko, Susu, Mandingo and Fullah constitute the main ethnic groups in the north; the Mendi, and Sherbro in the south; and the Kissi and Kono in the east. The SLPP largely dominates the South and the APC the North, with the east dividing their votes between the two parties. This division was exacerbated by the fact that successive post-independence regimes engaged in ethnic politics, and favoured different regions and ethnic groups in appointments to government, civil service, and army positions. According to the TRC findings, by the end of the 1980s, there remained very little national identity and the country was deeply divided. The disputed 2012 national elections, which APC won by 58.7% votes and contested in the Supreme Court by SLPP, demonstrate that these divisions are still powerful.

The constitutional reform process could also be useful in supporting the development of effective and broadly inclusive political parties which could demonstrate appeal across ethnic lines. Historically, the opposition in Sierra Leone was systematically suppressed until it was formally banned by the 1978 Constitution, removing all checks and balances against the incumbents. Key in this process of suppression was the use of emergency powers to silence opponents and systematically abuse fundamental human rights. The 1991 Constitution went some way to providing safeguards to prevent the country from sliding back into a single-party state, but it has been suggested that this framework could still be reviewed to strengthen political pluralism, including by empowering the Political Parties Registration Commission.

Constitutional and or legal reform may also be a useful tool for addressing issues around extractive industries; natural resource management and land – all of which are potential trigger issues for conflict and which still need to be addressed by the country. During the conflict, national resources, including diamonds, were exploited without benefit to the population, and used to fuel the conflict. Indeed, poor governance of natural resources was one of the root causes of the civil war. Despite its resources, its population lives in poverty: according to the Human Development Report, 76% of the population remains below the poverty line. Notably, the 2008 CRC Report made some recommendations pertaining to the management of extractive industries, including proposing the establishment of an Extractive Industries Commission. This could be an important constitutional mechanism for ensuring that the revenues from minerals (and perhaps oil and gas) contribute to national prosperity.

4 TRC Vol. 2 Para 16

of 45

SECTION 2: PROJECT STRATEGY

While Sierra Leone has made considerable progress in rebuilding its democratic institutions following two decades of one-party rule and the subsequent debilitating civil conflict of the 1990s, it is imperative that the proposed constitutional review consolidate national Peace-building and State-building efforts through a consultative, transparent and highly inclusive process. This underlying objective is the central theme which will guide the UN’s support for the national constitutional review process. The Project will focus on constitutional dialogue and reform as a mechanism for peace consolidation and political transformation, through entrenching the nascent social contract and a new legal dispensation for the country. The Project will seek to build on local opportunities to mitigate risks and reduce conflict, including by collaborating with national counterparts to ensure an inclusive and transparent process which builds on existing work, including the 2008 CRC Report, TRC Report and the national Vision 2025 process undertaken by the Government. This project is a joint UNIPSIL/UNDP support to the Constitutional Review Process. At all times and phases of this project UN support should be guided by delivering assistance that assists and encourages Sierra Leonean stakeholders to design and implement the constitutional review in a manner that adheres to the core principles of inclusiveness, participation, and transparency in order to achieve the objectives of peace consolidation and positive political transformation.

The UN’s support will remain responsive to the direction set by national constitutional partners. As per the UN Secretary General’s Guidance Note on UN Assistance to Constitution-Making Processes, the Project will be sensitive to the need to provide advice and options, while ensuring that the process is nationally owned and led. . The international community is already cognizant of the importance of constitutional review and ready to provide the necessary support. An inter-agency Technical Assessment Mission (TAM) was deployed to Sierra Leone from 14 to 25 January 2013, to conduct a review of progress made in the implementation of UNIPSIL’s mandate.5 The TAM concluded that the Mission should be phased out by March 2014. It further identified a number of residual tasks for the final year of UNIPSIL’s presence, including assistance to the country to embark upon an inclusive, participatory, transparent and nationally owned constitutional review process, in order to consolidate the gains made since the end of the civil war. These findings have been enshrined in Security Council Resolution 2097 (2013) and will be implemented through this joint UNIPSIL/UNDP Projectactivity.

Guiding Principles for Project Implementation

Given that the constitutional review process is a highly dynamic, politically sensitive activity, Project implementation will be guided by a fundamental set of programming principles which seek to ensure that the UN is highly responsive to the national context:

Ensuring conflict sensitivity

5 Including but not limited to: decentralization through a review of the 1991 Constitution and the enactment of relevant legislation; consolidation

of good governance reforms, focusing on anti-corruption instruments; preparation and conduct of the 2012 elections; meeting the country’s Peacebuilding and development priorities through strengthening capacity building of national political, security, human rights and rule of law institutions, promoting good governance and accountability, promoting gender and social equality, strengthening human rights protection, supporting efforts to improve youth empowerment and strengthening efforts to tackle transnational organized crime; promotion of human rights, democratic institutions and the rule of law; mitigation of potential cross-border threats; development of initiatives for the protection and well-being of youth, women and children; promotion of a culture of peace and dialogue including through building an independent and capable public radio capacity; (engagement with bilateral and international partners, with national authorities in the formulation of the Agenda for Prosperity and in coordinating an integrated international response to it; and the work of the Peacebuilding Commission.

of 45

The UN’s support to the constitutional process needs to “do no harm” and be alert to identifying potential flashpoints that could arise during the constitutional review and utilising opportunities to support national stakeholders to bridge social divides between different political and regional groupings. To this end, the Project will be guided heavily by conflict analysis being produced internally by UNIPSIL (during the term of the mission’s mandate), as well seeking advice from other UN agency projects and technical experts working on relevant issues. The UN will focus on constantly identifying macro and micro-level causes of tensions, which could include divisive substantive issues or problems in the design and implementation of the process itself, and supporting the CRC and Government of Sierra Leone to conduct the process in such a way as to engage in dialogue and outreach activities to reduce political tensions and address potential “conflict triggers”. A process that is pushed through by the Government without support from opposition political and social forces could create more harm to peace and stability than the benefit derived from the amendments themselves. The UN will work with the CRC to identify partnerships with other key stakeholders, such as Parliament and chieftaincies, and will actively develop national capacities for peace-building where possible.

Support Peacebuilding and reconciliation

While ensuring conflict sensitivity in implementation approaches, at the same time the Project will make every effort to support activities designed to address the underlying causes of conflict and promote Peacebuilding and reconciliation. In particular, the project should endeavour to encourage and promote outreach across regional and ethnic groups, so that different social and political groups can exchange ideas, learn about their fellow citizens, build trust, and address past or on-going discontents. In this way the constitutional review is as much a national dialogue as it is a process of legal reform. The Project team should promote dialogue and mediation among social/political groups, within the CRC, and between the CRC and key stakeholders, such as political parties and MPs. This work will contribute to broader UNDP efforts to build local capacities to manage conflict. Through the CRC’s outreach activities, the Project will also work more broadly to contribute to the national effort to strengthen state-society relations by promoting transparency and inclusiveness as a means of addressing the underlying problem of societal distrust of the state;

Promoting social cohesion as a key overarching theme

Noting that CRC members and MPs are considered leaders in their home constituencies, it is important that they are supported to work together to provide a public example of social cohesion which will strengthen national unity and contribute to the broader development of a cohesive society in which individuals and communities peacefully manage and resolve disputes and tensions. Throughout the Project’s activities, the UN will place a particular emphasis on political inclusion (incl. by promoting dialogue with MPs), and on public engagement in political processes. Special effort will also be made for the inclusion of women, young people, the disabled and other marginalized groups.

Promoting the core principles of inclusiveness, participation, transparency and national ownership

In an effort to protect the legitimacy and integrity of the constitutional review process and forthcoming constitution, as well as achieve the ancillary benefits of promoting Peacebuilding and reconciliation, strengthening national unity, building trust between communities and between the citizenry and the government, and empowering citizens on principles and practices of democracy, the Project should wherever possible and appropriate promote these core principles of inclusiveness, participation, transparency and national ownership in the design and implementation of the constitutional review.

Inclusiveness: All Sierra Leoneans, as individuals, communities, and interests, will have an opportunity to participate in the constitutional review and express their views.

of 45

Public participation: The CRC will go to the people, first through education and then through consultation, so that the review process is nationally owned.

Transparency: The constitutional review will be open so that the people know what is happening and are informed at each stage of the process.

National ownership: The people must own this process so that they can own their constitution.

Promoting a more educated and empowered citizenry as a key overarching theme

The constitutional review process provides the ideal platform for the commencement of a process of robust civic education which will lay the foundations for a more politically educated and informed populace, capable of selecting good leadership, demanding enforcement and implementation of constitutional rights and provisions, and promoting peaceful and democratic conflict resolution. The Project should consider civic education not just as a means to preparing the citizenry for public consultations, but as an end unto itself.

Ensuring a flexible approach to respond to the fluid political environment

This Project will need to be closely and flexibly managed to respond to changes in the operating environment, which will be inevitable in such a politically sensitive area. It is for this reason that it is proposed to recruit a dedicated P5 Chief Technical Advisor, who be supported by a dedicated UNDP programme manager. This team composition will ensure appropriate management of government and donor resources, while leaving the CTA free to ensure politically sensitive and responsive advice is provided to key stakeholders.

Maximising partnerships

Over the last decade of post-conflict rebuilding, considerable capacity has been built within national institutions and civil society to support democratic dialogue and engagement, This Project envisages leveraging the considerable expertise already developed within Sierra Leone for the benefit of the constitutional process. Institutional partners could include the Law Reform Commission, National Human Rights Commission, National Democracy Commission, National Elections Commission and the Ministry for Gender and Social Welfare, all of whom have relevant subject expertise, as well as outreach capacities. The UN will also work closely with other development partners, to ensure that lessons can learned and applied from previous consultation and outreach efforts.

Leveraging UN expertise in support of Project implementation

UNDP, along with UNIPSILIPSIL and the UN Country Team in Sierra Leone have a strong comparative advantage to support the constitutional review process as a trusted partner and neutral broker in Sierra Leone since the end of the war. A strong “One UN” approach will be implemented in support of this Project to ensure that the UN’s longstanding engagement across sectors can be leveraged for the benefit of this Project. In particular:

UNDP can provide complementary Project supportcomprehensive project management capacity, in particular, by drawing on the expertise of its existing governance team (for example, through the CTAs working on electoral support and parliamentary development), as well as UNDP staff working in relevant substantive areas such as access to justice, youth development, land reform, local governance and management of extractive resources. UNDP can also provide high quality and efficient project management support, including in the context of UNIPSIL’s envisaged drawdown in

of 45

2014, after which UNDP would be well-positioned to continue to manage implementation of this Project.

UNIPSIL’s latest mandate specifically empowers UNIPSIL to support the proposed constitutional review. UNIPSIL’s existing political and civil affairs units already have strong partnerships with the Government and civil society (in particular through the Non-State Actors Programme) which can be drawn on to inform programming under this Project, in particular in terms of developing a conflict sensitive civic education and public consultation strategy which leverages existing capacity amongst non-state actors.

UNDP can provide complementary Project support, in particular, by drawing on the expertise of its existing governance team (for example, through the CTAs working on electoral support and parliamentary development), as well as UNDP staff working in relevant substantive areas such as access to justice, youth development, land reform, local governance and management of extractive resources. UNDP can also provide high quality and efficient project management support, including in the context of UNIPSIL’s envisaged drawdown in 2014, after which UNDP would be well-positioned to continue to manage implementation of this Project.

UNWomen has already commenced a review of the 1991 Constitution to identify discriminatory provisions and/or entry-points for promoting gender equality. This work provided a useful starting point for activities to promote substantive gender equality issues during the constitutional review process, as well as ensuring a gender-sensitive civic education and public consultation process. UNWomen will be a key partner during implementation of the Project.

EAD is available to support the constitutional review project through knowledge, experience and expertise. Fundamental electoral issues such as sequencing of electoral events, electoral systems or Temporary Special Measures such as quotas should in any case be consulted with EAD. Electoral policies issued by the UN Focal Point for electoral Assistance apply to any electoral elements in this project.

The UN team in Sierra Leone will also draw on the UN’s global expertise and resources on constitutional development. The UN Department of Political Affairs and UNDP headquarters have already provided technical advice and support to UNIPSIL and UNDP as well as directly to the office of the Attorney General’s Office. UNIPSIL UNDP, UNIPSIL and the UNCT will continue to draw on headquarters constitutional advisory and support services throughout the term of the Project, including the UN Mediation Standby Team quick-deployment facility.

In line with the guiding principles outlined above, the current project is expected to have contributed to the achievement of the overall programme Outcome upon its completion in 2014, namely Sierra Leone Constitutional Review Committee capacitated to have an expertly-led inclusive, transparent, participatory and peaceful process of constitutional reform. The six outputs for the project are as follows:

1. Capacity of CRC members enhanced to undertake effective constitutional review process and produce final recommendations;

2. Capacity of CRC secretariat to provide legal and research services to CRC enhanced;

3. CRC communication and messaging strategy designed and implemented;

4. Civil society led inclusive and informative civic education process completed;

5. CRC led inclusive & transparent civic education and public consultation process completed;

6. Capacity of MPs, democratic institutions, political parties and civil society strengthened to effectively support and participate in the review process;

of 45

Project outputs and activities and their related expected results are described in more detail in the next section of this document.

SECTION 3: PROJECT OUTPUTS, ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS

The project envisages clusters of outputs and activities grouped around the one main outcome mentioned above. The outputs and activities that contribute to the outcome are not intended to be airtight compartments, but rather to yield areas of multiple entry points and institutions with which the project can collaborate. For example, political parties will be a key stakeholder in constitutional review process similarly; civil society organizations have a role to play in all six outputs.

Output 1: Capacity of CRC members enhanced to undertake effective constitutional review process and produce final recommendations

The proposed 80-member CRC is envisaged to comprise a range of legal and substantive experts, who represent a diverse range of political, geographic and issues-based constituencies throughout the country. Notably however, the technical knowledge of CRC members will vary based on their professional backgrounds. With this in mind, in order to ensure the CRC can effectively discharge its mandate, the Project will prioritise providing training and capacity development support to CRC members, on process issues and technical/substantive issues, as well as on mediation, dialogue, negotiation and conflict mitigation. This latter training recognises that the constitutional review is both a technical and a political process, and CRC members will need to have the necessary skills to mediate between parties who may disagree with each other. A P-5 UN Constitutional CTA will be recruited who will be responsible for providing ongoing technical advice to CRC members. The CTA will also identify ongoing training and capacity support needs for CRC members.

In order to guide the work of the CRC, it is anticipated that the CRC will need to agree on its Rules of Procedure as a first step. The UN anticipates supporting an initial Induction Training for the CRC, which could cover issues such as: goals and principles of constitution making, messaging and communications, public outreach and civic education, and negotiation, as well as being used as an opportunity to identify additional training for CRC members. During the Induction Training, the CRC could also be supported to develop its rules. These Rules should be designed to promote consensus in decision-making and prevent one political interest from imposing its view on all others. Noting that the CRC has 80 members, it is anticipated that the CRC will need to divide into thematic sub-committees in order to more effectively discuss key issues; these sub-committees, their TORs, and their decision-making processes will also be discussed and integrated into the Rules. The UN Constitutional CTA will also provide technical advice to these sub-committees throughout the constitutional review process.

It is anticipated that the CRC will be responsible for leading efforts to undertake civic education and public consultations throughout the country (see Activity Results 4 and 5), with an emphasis on more rural and remote areas, as well as undertaking negotiations amongst the CRC membership itself and with key stakeholders (see Activity Result 6). The CRC civic education and consultation efforts will be complemented in parallel by the civil society. Agreed CRC recommendations will then be submitted for consideration, first at a major National Constitutional Conference, and then by both Government and Parliament, and finally by referendum. This Project will support the efforts of the CRC to engage in stakeholder consultations and dialogue, with a specific emphasis on integrating conflict prevention and mitigation approaches into the CRC’s activities, in order to support the CRC to manage potentially sensitive issues such as management of extractives, political party regulation and winner-take all syndrome amongst branches of Government.

of 45

As part of the effort to promote dialogue and Peacebuilding, the Project will also support the proposed National Constitutional Conference (NCC). The NCC needs to be harnessed as a key consensus-building activity amongst the different groups throughout the country, including the currently divided political leadership, as well as Parliament. It is anticipated that the NCC will include members of the Cabinet as well as all MPs, which will be important in promoting parliamentary buy-in for the CRC’s recommendations in advance of the CRC’s amendments being discussed in Cabinet and a constitutional amendment bill finally being submitted to Parliament. The UN will focus support on ensuring inclusion and consensus-building.

The final step of the constitutional review process is a referendum. This Project does not include support to the referendum process. In the event UN assistance is requested to support the holding of the referendum an electoral needs assessment will be required and will be carried out by the UN Electoral Assistance Division (EAD) on behalf of the UN Focal Point for Electoral Assistance at least six (6) months prior to the holding of the referendum.

Output 2: Capacity of CRC Secretariat to provide legal and research services to CRC developed

The CRC will need to be supported by a technical Secretariat to discharge its wide-ranging mandate. To this end, the UN (through the April 2013 DPA and UNDP mission) has already provided advice to the Attorney General’s planning team on the possible composition of this Secretariat. The envisaged Secretariat structure would include teams who could support: (i) administration (human resources management, finance and logistics); (ii) Secretariat services (including legal advice and research for CRC members and sub-committees); (iii) communications services (to explain the CRC’s work) and; (iv) outreach services (to support the civic education and public consultation processes).

The Project will provide technical and capacity development support to ensure the Secretariat can effectively support the work of the CRC (see also Activity Results 3-5). The UN Constitutional CTA will also provide training and technical advice to the Secretariat as needed throughout the constitutional review process. A major emphasis will be on ensuring locally-contextualised legal analysis and drafting services are available to CRC members, as well as research. In addition to locally undertaken research, a small budget to commission papers on key issues of interest (eg. power-sharing modalities, regulating extractives, comparative electoral systems, Bills of Rights, gender equality) has been included in the Project. It is anticipated that the Government will provide seconded staff to populate the structure of the Secretariat, as well as office space and basic supplies, while this Project will provide technical support for the work of the Secretariat. It is envisaged that Secretariat staff will be responsible for procurement and logistics activities, though Project staff can provide guidance and oversight over these processes, as appropriate.

Output 3: CRC Communication Strategy designed and implemented

The Government is committed to an inclusive and transparent constitutional review process. In reality, this requires the CRC to proactively develop its own “messaging” to manage the public’s expectations and ensure that its activities are well-communicated and understood by the population at large, as well as key stakeholders whose buy-in to the process is necessary for its success. With that in mind, the Project will support the development of a simple CRC Communications Strategy, to guide the CRC’s own efforts to communicate what it is doing. The strategy must have two components: (1) formulating the message itself; and (2) message dissemination so as to reach as many people and constituencies as possible. The Government has already commenced work on a website; combined with social media such as Facebook and twitter, this could be a good mechanism for communicating with people in Freetown and Sierra Leoneans in Diaspora, in particular young people who use Facebook. It is anticipated that a regular newsletter on the CRC’s activities could also be produced and disseminated to Parliament, through the

of 45

Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development down to the ward level and through other partners of the Project. Other vehicles for message delivery, in particular to reach rural areas and illiterate citizens, will need to be identified and utilized as appropriate.

To ensure greater outreach of CRC information however, the Project will also facilitate closer partnership between the CRC and the media, to ensure that the media can responsibly and accurately support the CRC’s work. Training for journalists will be provided to ensure they understand the process and substantive issues. Radio, print media and television will all be tapped, with a special strategy designed to ensure effective use of community radio. Training will also be provided to CRC members to ensure they have skills on effective, positive and constructive messaging and communication. This will be a key element of the CRC’s conflict prevention and mitigation strategy, as poor communications, or inciting and politicized media, can undermine the process and at worse, can contribute to conflict.

Output 4: Civil society led inclusive and informative civic education process completed

This output will support civil society’s efforts in conducting a countrywide civic education campaign and stakeholder consultations process - both over the long-term and short-term. Civil society led civic education campaign on constitutional review will be managed independent of CRC but will be complementary to CRC efforts. Any civic education initiatives will need to draw on networks outside of Freetown in order that local communities are reached. Use of messaging in the local vernacular will be extremely important as well, particularly for grassroots communities and women. At the same time, there need to be specific efforts by civil society, including women and youth groups, to train them on specific issues and advocacy skills, to equip them to more effectively engage in subsequent public consultation processes. An effective and countrywide civic education campaign would address benefits of citizen participation in the constitutional review process and inform citizen of their rights and responsibilities. For democracy to function, a critical mass should understand and practice values of democracy such as rule of law, participation and tolerance.

Given the multitude of actors involved in Civil society led civic education campaign, coordination of CRC and civic society efforts would be critical for citizenry to receive uniform and correct information with regards to the process. Therefore, any coordination mechanism between civil society actors and the CRC would require regular meetings between these two very important players. Through effective coordination civil society would be able to contribute positively in all five phases described under output 5.

In addition to engaging in civic education activities some CSOs may also want to advocate directly with the CRC on specific constitutional issues of interest (for example, minority, gender, or human rights). The Project includes funding for a Small Grants Facility to support advocacy and awareness raising activities by key civil society organizations. The Small Grants Facility is designed to enable CSOs to undertake their own advocacy with the community and the CRC, based on their own agenda and priorities, as opposed to the “official” CRC effort. The Small Grants Facility will also be guided by guidelines on criteria for eligibility, and grants will be allocated taking into consideration geographical constituencies, ethnicity and capacity dimensions. Special care will need to be taken to avoid the perception that the UN is unduly favouring certain CSO groups or issues through the use of the Small Grants Facility. Any civil society organizations seeking funds would need to develop full-fledged proposals and be selected through a competitive review process. The mechanism employed by the programme to award grants to civil society for civic education activities will ensure that at least 25% goes to women’s groups that target women’s participation in the constitutional review process. To ensure inclusion of all voices, the Project will prioritise support to ensure that marginalised groups can access advice and support to capacity development for:

of 45

Women’s advocacy

- The Project/UNWomen will work closely with the Ministry for Gender and Social Welfare and other women’s CSOs to ensure women’s voices are able to be heard throughout the process. Strategies will be developed and supported to promote public support for gender equality issues of relevance to the constitutional review (e.g. 30% quotas for women in decision-making);

Youth engagement

- As the future leaders of the nation, it is imperative that they be included in this process. In addition to support for social media engagement, innovative activities will be developed with Universities and high schools to ensure that young people – who comprise more than 60% of the population – are engaged in the process. Essay/posted/research competitions may be initiated to draw in a broader cross-section of young people. Media campaigns will also be tailored to interest youth.

Output 5: CRC led inclusive and transparent civic education and public consultation process completed

One the most important and visible components of the CRC’s work will be to undertake a highly inclusive process of consultation with the public in an effort to ensure buy-in for the constitutional review process across the country. The CRC, with the support from the UN CTA, will develop the implementation strategy for civic education and public consultation plan, including identifying the issues that it should cover, geographical locations, timing and associated budget. There will be a number of phases of education and consultation which will have to be undertaken throughout the CRC’s mandate, namely:

Phase 1: Civic education

- This phase will focus on educating the public about the contents of the 1991 Constitution as well as the 2008 CRC Recommendations. This is an important end-point in itself. Many stakeholders have identified that political education is severely lacking, such that civic education will usefully contribute to democratic consolidation more generally. Specifically though, this civic education will be focused on educating the public so that they can then develop an informed position before they engage in the CRC’s public consultations.

Phase 2: Public consultation

- Following a basic civic education process, the CRC will undertake a major public consultation exercise to gather views from throughout the country to inform the CRC’s final recommendations. That said, the CRC will then have to triangulate these views with other data points, including preferences of political leaders, international norms, and technical/expert opinions, in order to determine what will best serve national Peacebuilding and Statebuilding goals;

Phase 3: Education and consultation on CRC Draft Recommendations

- Once the CRC develops its first draft of recommendations, it will be necessary to undertake a final education and consultation process to vet the recommendations and build ownership for them amongst the community prior to the National Constitutional Conference. Such a process will be particularly important if the CRC identifies that certain recommendations may be controversial and require additional consultation;

Phase 4: Education and consultation on Constitutional Amendment Bill

of 45

- Once the CRC completes its work, the Government will develop a Bill for consideration by Parliament. Additional consultations may be necessary at this stage, depending on how different the final Bill is from the CRC’s recommendations. A small budget has been included to support consultations by Parliament on the final Bill;

Phase 5: Voter education on final referendum question

- Once a Constitutional Amendment Bill is finally passed by Parliament, it may need to be put to a final referendum. Voter education will need to be undertaken to ensure that voters understand the referendum process and the issues involved in the Constitutional Amendment Bill. It is anticipated that such work would be undertaken by the National Election Commission. This Project does not deal with this final phase, and any decision on UN involvement would be undertaken as described above under Output 1.

The Project will support the development of a Civic Education and Public Consultation Strategy to guide the CRC’s efforts to educate and consult the public. This Project will utilise lessons learned from the UNISPIPSIL Non-State Actors Programme and the UNDP Electoral Support Project to design the civic education and public consultation processes. It is envisaged that mix of media will be used, but that the heavy bulk of outreach by CRC will be undertaken in partnership with national institutions (eg. NCD, NEC, SLHRC). The Project will support the CRC to develop civic education curriculum to ensure consistent messaging across the country. A process of identifying and accrediting partner organisations will then be undertaken, followed by a training-of-trainers process to build the skills of the civic education teams. Funding is included in the Project to actually underwrite the costs of accredited partners to enable them to undertake their civic education and public consultation work for the CRC. Consideration could be given to including MPs in the civic education teams that work throughout the country during this phase.

Following the civic education process, a major public consultation process will be undertaken to gather views from the public across the country. It is anticipated that the CRC will lead this process of public consultation to ensure a non-partisan environment within which people can share their views. Special effort will be made to reach out to women, young people, illiterate people and other marginalised groups, including by ensuring that face-to-face consultations are undertaken in smaller groups, to ensure that all people have safe spaces in which to discuss their ideas. Special outreach approaches will also be developed to tap the views of religious and traditional elders, while ensuring at the same time that the views of these very respected leaders do not dominate the overall consultation process.

During the public consultation process and afterwards, the Project will support the CRC Secretariat to transcribe and collate the public hearings for the benefit of the CRC. The website will be also used as a vehicle for collecting submissions and for publicising all submissions collected by the CRC. As noted earlier above, similar (though likely a shorter) public consultation processes may also be supported to gather feedback on the draft CRC recommendations, as well as on the final Constitutional Amendment Bill.

Output 6: Capacity of MPs, political parties and traditional leaders strengthened to effectively support and participate in the review process

Complementary to the civic education and public consultation process, the Project will work with particularly significant stakeholders to develop their capacity to effectively engage with the work of the CRC in order to ensure a consensus-based, participatory process. In particular, effort will be made to reach out to political decision-makers and representatives, many of whom will likely have a key role to play in the constitutional negotiations and in representing the public. In particular, the Project will support work with:

of 45

Members of Parliament

- MPs will have a final say on the constitutional recommendations, as they have the responsibility for endorsing the final constitutional amendment bill which is required before a referendum can be held. As such, the Project will support activities designed to build the capacity and commitment of MPs to engage in the constitutional review process throughout its entirety. Outreach activities between MPs and the CRC will be supported, as well as dialogue/negotiation meetings.

Political parties

- All political parties have been invited to send representatives to be part of the CRC. That said, it is still important to support efforts of the CRC to reach out to political party leadership. A Political Parties Forum may be supported to facilitate regular briefings by the CRC. Efforts will also be made to facilitate dialogue between the All Political Parties Youth Association (APPYA) and the All Political Parties Women Association (APPWA), in order to ensure that these two constituencies are also kept meaningfully informed and engaged. The Political Parties Registration Commission will be a key partner in this work;

Chieftains

- The Chiefdoms of Sierra Leone are the third-level units of administration. The districts of Sierra Leone are divided into 149 chiefdoms. Since 1896, the chiefs remained the only institution of local government until the World Bank sponsored creation of a system of local councils in 2004, and today they still retain considerable influence in their communities. Only individuals from the designated ruling families" of a chieftaincy are eligible to become Paramount Chiefs. The Project will undertake specific outreach and dialogue work with chiefs to ensure they are meaningfully brought into the process, both as citizens and as influential leaders of their communities.

of 45

SECTION 4: RESULTS AND RESOURCES FRAMEWORK

UN TJV cluster 1 and 4: Support to good governance

UNDP CPD cluster 1: Improved Governance and Risk Management

Partnership Strategy: Creation of a multi-donor basket fund. For partners who are non-contributors to the project, every attempt will be made through coordination mechanisms to ensure information sharing and coordination of activities.

Project title and ID (ATLAS Award ID):

BASELINE, INDICATORS, AND TARGETS

INDICATIVE ACTIVITIES RESPONSIBLE

PARTIES INPUTS

Outcome: Sierra Leone Constitutional Review process finalised and revised constitution presented to parliament for adoption

Baseline:

- CRC and CRC Secretariat being set up currently;

- legal/technical capacity of CRC members and Secretariat staff is variable;

- No CRC Communication Strategy or activities underway

- No CRC Civic Education and Public Consultation Strategy in place or implemented

- Variable capacity of CSOs, media and MPs to engage with constitutional review process

Indicators:

- CRC members capable of producing technically proper amendments and recommendations

- CRC Secretariat capable of providing high-quality and timely services to CRC members

Output 1: Capacity of CRC members developed to undertake effective constitutional review process and produce final recommendations

1.1 Conduct induction training on the goals and principles of constitution making, the Sierra Leonean constitutional process, substantive content issues and messaging/communications, negotiation, dialogue, mediation and conflict resolution

1.2 Support development of the Rules of Procedures

1.3 Support development of TORs for CRC Sub-Committees

1.4 Conduct training for CRC Sub-Committees on key constitutional issues within their mandate, including specific mediation training with respect to sensitive constitutional issues

1.5 Provide high level constitutional expertise and technical advice to CRC Plenary and Sub-Committees as requested

1.6 Support preparation of draft amendments/proposals and final report

CRC, UNIPSIL, UNDP

USD 339,000

20,000

37,000

17,000

25,000

74,000

12,000

of 45



PARTIES INPUTS

- Effective civic education undertaken to build knowledge of constitutional issues

- Effective public consultation process undertaken to collect feedback from across the country

- Media responsibly reporting on constitutional issues

- MPs, women and youth specifically capacitated to engage constitutional process

- CSOs network is established and effectively participating in the consultation process

Targets (year 1)

- CRC Members agree on Rules of Procedure

- CRC Members agree on a workplan for the CRC’s work

- CRC Secretariat set up and working to provide technical support to members

- CRC website developed and maintained

- CRC Civic Education and Public Consultation Strategy developed

- CSOs and others trained to undertake civic education

- Media trained on constitutional reporting

Targets (year 2)

- CRC Secretariat set up and working to provide

1.7 Support conduct and reporting on National Constitutional Conference

151,000

Output 2: Capacity of CRC Secretariat to provide legal and research services to CRC developed Develop organisation structure and prepare job description and ToRs for staff

2.1 Recruit and conduct induction training for Secretariat staff

2.2 Provide ongoing capacity development support to all Secretariat staff, including basic training on dialogue, mediation and conflict resolution

2.3 Commission papers from national/international experts on topics, as requested

2.4 Provide quality assurance and technical advice to support Secretariat Unit inside CRC to provide CRC Members with high quality advice

2.5 Supplemental offices supplies and equipment to complement the contribution of the Government of SL

CRC, UNIPSIL, UNDP

USD 759,000

45,000

45,000

69,000

100,000

500,000

Output 3: CRC Communication & Messaging Strategy designed and implemented

3.1 Develop a simple Communication & Messaging Strategy to explain the CRC’s work, manage the public’s expectations, and ensure regular updates provided to public and key stakeholders

3.2 Provide ongoing capacity development support to all Secretariat staff, including basic training competencies/responsibilities of Secretariat departments

3.3 Support the maintenance of the CRC website, twitter and Facebook pages

CRC, UNIPSIL, UNDP, media, universities, UNWomen

USD 270,000

15,000

30,000

10,000

of 45



PARTIES INPUTS

technical support to members

- CRC produces draft amendments and recommendations for consideration

- CRC organises peaceful and inclusive National Constitutional Conference

- Peaceful public consultation process undertaken and submissions received from good cross-section of the community

- Peaceful dialogue processes undertaken in relation to conflict sensitive constitutional issues

3.4 Produce monthly CRC newsletter for website and in print

3.5 Develop a communication programme with community and other radio stations

3.6 Provide constitution making training to journalists, editors, media house executives with a focus on ethical, objective and conflict sensitive reporting and conduct media monitoring

3.7 Print and distribute copies of the 1991 Constitution, 2008 CRC report and CRC process brochure. Produce CDs of same for citizens who cannot read

3.8 Support CRC to review the 1991 Constitution and 2008 CRC Report in order to frame issues for civic education and public consultations

3.9 Support CRC to develop a conflict and gender sensitive, human rights based and peace-building focused Civic Education material as well as Civic Education Strategy + programme implementation plan

3.10 Develop and implement a programme to engage youth in the constitutional reform process, including outreach with Universities and through social media

12,000

10,000

33,000

40,000

15,000

50,000

55,000

Output 4: Civil Society led inclusive and informative civic education process completed

4.1 Conduct a civic and legal awareness baseline survey, including integrating questions to identify potential conflict trigger

4.2 Prepare detailed proposals pertaining to CSO involvement in the constitutional review process

4.3 Conduct independent research on specific issues especially by interest and marginalised groups

4.4 Prepare conflict and gender sensitive focused civic

Civil Society Organization, CRC, UNDP

USD 1,000,000

50,000

20,000

120,000

60,000

of 45



PARTIES INPUTS

education strategy and programme implementation plan.

4.5 Conduct national and sub-national civic education campaigns and stakeholders consultations before and after the various stages of constitutional review process i.e. After the first CRC draft is produced, after the Bill of Constitutional Amendments is tabled to Parliament, and in the run up to the referendum.

4.6 Produce findings of consultations process, print and distribute to public and share with the CRC.

4.7 Conduct consensus building, coordination meetings and workshops between the CRC and key civil society

700,000

20,000

30,000

Output 5: CRC led inclusive and transparent civic education and public consultation process completed

5.1 Prepare, print and disseminate public consultation materials (including non-written materials)

5.2 Conduct training of trainers on public consultation for CRC, media and civil society, incl. training on dialogue, mediation and conflict resolution

5.3 Support the CRC to undertake civic education throughout the country at ward level:

a) in the initial phase (to support the first public consultations);

b) on the draft CRC Report and recommendations (in advance of the National Constitutional Conference);

c) on the final proposals in the Constitutional Amendment Bill;

d) on the final constitutional amendments approved by Parliament, in advance of the referendum (if necessary)

CRC, UNIPSIL, UNDP, LRC, SLHRC, NEC, NCD, PPRC, Parliament, UNWomen,

USD 647, 000

100,000

40,000

250,000

of 45



PARTIES INPUTS

5.4 Support organization of constitutional dialogue conferences, including for MPs, traditional chiefs, CSOs (including women and youth groups) and public at large, with a focus on supporting peace-building and nation-building goals.

5.5 Work with Secretariat to distribute civic education materials (brochures, posters, CDs, radio spots, illustrations, etc.)

5.6 Establish and administer a Small Grants Facility to support civil society organizations to undertake outreach, advocacy and awareness raising activities with their members and to assist them to engage effectively with the CRC process.

5.7 Conduct training of trainers on civic education and public for CRC, MPs, media and civil society, including training on dialogue, mediation and conflict resolution

5.8 Produce recordings / transcripts of all relevant public discussions and dialogue

5.9 Support the design of web site interface to receive public inputs. Analyse public consultation data and prepare report – collate and synthesize views and draft reports from public consultations

5.10 Support the CRC to undertake additional public consultations on the CRC’s Draft Recommendations

5.11 Support the Government and Parliament to undertake additional public consultations on the draft Constitutional Amendment Bill

Managed by UNDP

100,000

30,000

0

15,000

20,000

15,000

42,000

35,000

Output 6: Enhance capacity of MPs, political parties and traditional leaders to effectively support and participate in the review process

6.1 Share best practices on key constitutional issues through

CRC, UNIPSIL, UNDP, PPRC, Parliament, UNWomen,

USD 150,000

20,000

of 45



PARTIES INPUTS

information exchange

6.2 Providing training on dialogue, mediation and conflict resolution to MPs in support of constitutional outreach, as well as issues-based training

6.3 Support specific dialogue and outreach work between the CRC and (i) MPs and (ii) political parties.

6.4 Conduct consensus building meetings and workshops between the CRC and MPs and political parties on the CRC draft recommendations, as necessary

6.5 Work with the Ministry for Local Government and other stakeholders to develop outreach and consultation activities with chiefs and other local officials

6.6 Share best practices on key constitutional issues through information exchange

6.7 Develop and implement a programme to promote gender equality issues in throughout the constitutional process and content, including providing capacity support and technical advice to women’s advocates (e.g. the Ministry of Women and women’s NGOs)

Ministry of Women and Social Affairs

10,000

20,000

15,000

20,000

15,000

50,000

Project Start up and Implementation

Output

Well managed and well coordinated implementation of Constitutional Review Programme as approved by LPAC and amendments approved by the Steering Committee.

Baseline:

No running Project

Recruitment of CTA (18 moths)

National Staff (admin/Finance, civic educations, gender and youth)

Regular Steering Committee meetings

Monitoring, evaluation and reporting

DPA monitoring mission

UNDP USD 650,000

500,000

60,000

5,000

10,000

15,000

of 45



PARTIES INPUTS

Indicators:

CTA onboard by end of Q3 2013

Regular minuted Steering Committee meetings held

Strategic documents developed and implemented

Regular reports submitted

Audits

Final project evaluation

40,000

20,000

For the Government of Sierra Leone: For UNDP:

Signature: --------------------------------------- Signature: --------------------------------------- Date: July 2013 Date: July 2013

of 45

SECTION 5: INDICATIVE BUDGET SHEET An indicative budget breakdown follows. UNDP’s standard 2% ISS (direct costs to the project) and 7% GMS (indirect costs to the project) are also included.

Project Outputs 2013

(6 Months) 2014

2015 (3 months)

2013 –2015 Total

1.1. Capacity of CRC members developed to undertake effective constitutional review process and produce final recommendations

100,000 239,000 0 USD 339,000

1.2. Capacity of CRC Secretariat to provide legal and research services to CRC developed

400,000 179,500 179,500 USD 759,000

1.3. CRC Communication & Messaging Strategy designed and implemented

50,000 170,000 50,000 USD 270,000

1.4. Civil society led inclusive and informative civic education process completed

100,000 800,000 100,000 USD 1,000,000

1.5. CRC led inclusive & transparent civic education and public consultation process completed 100,000 447,000 100,000 USD 647, 000

1.6. Enhance capacity of MPs, political parties and traditional leaders to effectively support and participate in the review process 25,000 100,000 25,000 USD 150,000

TOTAL PROGRAMMING COSTS 775,000 1,935,500 454,000 USD 3,165,000

Project start up and implementation 140,000 370,000 140,000 USD 650,000

PROGRAMME AND MANAGEMENT COSTS 915,000 2,305,500 594,500 USD 3,815,000

Indirect Costs GMS (7%)

59,859

150,827 38,892 USD 249,579

Direct Costs ISS (2%) 16,767 40,248 10,894 USD 69,910

TOTAL PROJECT COST 991,626 2,496,575 644,286 USD 4,132,487

of 45

SECTION 6: ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTATION TIMETABLE

ACTIVITY 2013 2014 2015

QUARTER >>> Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

1 Cabinet approval of setting up of CRC

2 Receipt of nominations of members of CRC

3 National Launching of CRC by the President

4 Orientation for members of CRC

5 Inaugural Meeting/Appointment of Tech. Comm. of CRC

6 Setting up of Website- contributions/publicity

7 Sittings of CRC

8 Consultations/Public Hearings/Submissions/Outreach

9 District Consultations

10 Western Area Consultations

11 Report Writing Retreat

12 Report Validation/Finalization

13 Govt. receipt of Report & issuance of WP on Report

14 Preparation of Final Draft Constitution

15 Printing of Draft Constitution by Govt. Printer

16 Pre-Legislative Sessions with Parliament

of 45

SECTION 7: MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS

This document is the result of consultations held with the Government of Sierra Leone, independent national institutions, CSOs and a range of development partners during the DPA-UNDP Constitutional Assessment Mission in April 2013 and other strategic meetings between the Government and UNISPIL UNIPSIL and UNDP. This Project represents an integrated UN initiative in support of the constitutional review process in Sierra Leone. This current UNDP Project Document includes the contribution of the UNIPSIL advisors, UN Women, the DPA constitutional focal point, the DPA Standby Team of Mediation Experts, and the inputs of UNDP programme office and programme teams. As such, the programme serves as the overall substantive framework for the UN, with all actors contributing to the results as articulated, regardless of where they sit organizationally. That said it may be that other UN agencies design and provide other complementary support to Sierra Leone’s constitutional review. In such a case every effort should be made by implementers of the Project Document to include such efforts into the overall UN support. This will allow the UN to speak and deliver as one in response to the needs of national stakeholders, present a harmonized approach to donors and other partners, and enhance the effectiveness of the assistance.

Management Arrangements

A Chief Technical Advisor (Constitutional Review) will be brought onboard who will be responsible, with support from in collaboration with the Political Section of UNIPSIL, for day-to-day management and technical support of the programme, as well as ensuring that the programme produces the outputs and results specified in this programme document, in compliance with the required standards of quality, within the specified limits of time and cost and in line with UNDP rules and regulations. To support the CTA, UNDP will make use of all internal capacities in the programme and operations units and in particular the operations and finance capacities of the already established and currently functioning Elections Programme Management Unit (PMU) in close coordination with the CTA elections. It is expected that an integrated approach using existing UN staff will also contribute to reduce overall costs.

The Chief Technical Advisor will be supported by the PMU which will be responsible for providing project Support, in collaboration with the Operations staff and PMU elections of UNDP Sierra Leone.). The PMU is the dedicated, technically staffed unit that administers, manages and monitors the overall constitutional review project on a day-to-day basis. PMU staff includes operations staff that are familiar with UNDP procedures on recruitment, procurement and project execution modalities. The finance and administration officer will record, process, disburse and report expenditures on a regular basis. The finance officer works closely with the UNDP Country Office’s finance professionals

Given the political sensitivities and donor partnerships involved in constitutional assistance, there is a need for regular (fortnightly at minimum) briefings and debriefings with the UNDP/UNIPSIL senior management, whose support is often critical when swift decisions/actions are necessary.

To maintain a single communication and command line, it is important that the CTA remains the chief managing officer for the programme and technical aspects. However, the CTA will closely coordinate its work with UNIPSIL, report to the Executive Representative of the Secretary-General (ERSG), during the remainder of the UNIPSIL mission, and the UN Resident Coordinator and UNDP Country Director

of 45

thereafter. The Chief Technical Advisor will meet at least weeklyregularly with the UNIPSIL's Political Affairs and Peace Consolidation Section to discuss progress with the Project and identify issues for follow up. UNIPSIL will also provide guidance on political matters and share relevant political information with UNDP. UNIPSIL's Political Affairs and Peace Consolidation Section will work closely with the CTA in support of activities with political parties, the media and other non-state actors. UNWomen will work closely with the CTA on all gender-related activities. UNIPSIL and UNWomen will be represented on the Project Board, and will participate in regular coordination meetings, in quarterly decision-making and in annual work planning. If/when the UNDP Peace and Development Advisor is recruited, he/she will also work closely with the CTA, to provide advice on conflict sensitivity, including by participating in the weekly meetings with UNISPILPSIL and the CTA. The DPA and UNDP Constitutional Focal Points at headquarters will also provide technical advice and quality assurance support throughout the Project, as necessary to ensure high quality services are provided to national partners, and will therefore require periodic briefings and/or reports. One of the first tasks for the new CTA will be to elaborate the Annual Work Plan and Monitoring and Evaluation Plan, in a participatory and inclusive manner.

This programme will be directly implemented (DIM) by UNDP Sierra Leone, in consultation with the programme’s beneficiaries and other programme partners. All outcomes will be coordinated through the Steering Committee. The Steering Committee is the group responsible for making — on a consensus basis — management decisions for the project when guidance is required, including recommendations for UNDP approval of programme revisions. Such decisions must adhere to UNDP rules and regulations. Programme reviews by the Steering Committee should be made at regular intervals or as necessary. The Chief Technical Advisor will report to the Steering Committee, which comprises the following members:

Project Executive: Chairperson of the CRC and Attorney General of Sierra Leone; Senior Supplier: Representatives of Donors to the programme; Senior Beneficiary: Representatives of the Ministry of Finance, NEC, PPRC, Parliament

(bipartisan), CSOs (incl. women and youth), political parties, Office of the Attorney General,

The programme management structure is illustrated as follows:

P-5 Chief Technical

Advisor)

Steering Committee

Senior Beneficiary

MOF, NEC, PPRC,

Parliament (bipartisan), CSOs

(incl. women and youth),

political parties

Project Executive

CRC Chairperson

Attorney General

Senior Supplier

UNIPSIL / UNDP / UN

women / Donors

Project Assurance UNDP Sierra Leone

DPA HQ, UNDP HQ

Project Support

PMU and UNDP

Operations in particular

PMU Elections

Project Management Structure

National Civic Education & Training Coordinator

of 45

Programme Assurance will primarily be provided by UNDP Sierra Leone, as well as by DPA and UNDP headquarters units responsible for constitutional support. To this end, all Project reports from the CTA will be shared with the UNDP Country Office, as well as UNISPILUNIPSIL, the DPA Constitutional Focal Point and the UNDP Constitutional Focal Point. On demand programme support from a number of offices will also be provided. First, the Department of Political Affairs will provide political and technical advisory services in the implementation of the programme, while UNDP’s constitutional support specialists at headquarters will provide complementary technical advisory and programming support. DPA and UNDP will jointly conduct a mid-term review of the programme. UNDP Sierra Leone will liaise with the Bureau for Development Policy (BDP) and the Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery (BCPR) for support as needed on broader democratic governance and conflict prevention and recovery expertise to the implementation of the programme. This will include implementation support missions, as well as support to the programme and country office in monitoring progress towards the three outcomes.

Financial Arrangements

This programme will use the basket fund modality whereby partners operationalize their contributions to the basket through third-party cost-sharing arrangements or trust fund agreements. Based on the principles of the Paris Declaration, this modality will ensure an increased degree of coordination amongst the contributing parties as well as a reduction in transaction costs through harmonised narrative and financial reporting. Donor contributions to this project will be received into the basket fund via third-party cost-sharing arrangements negotiated at country level, or trust fund agreements approved at UNDP headquarters.

The total value of the project is USD 4,132,487, the programming costs is USD 3,165,000and project management cost is USD 550,000. Full implementation of all project activities will hinge on the mobilization and timely contribution of funding through voluntary contributions by interested donors. UNDP Sierra Leone will assess the normal Executive Board mandated 7% General Management Services (GMS) and 2% Implementation Support Services (ISS) fees. Budget revisions will be processed when deemed necessary and at least quarterly to ensure financial monitoring effectiveness and accuracy in programme accounts.

Coordination arrangements

Donor coordination will be done at two levels: (a) at the policy level through a high-level donor coordination mechanism; and (b) at the programme level through the Steering Committee of this Project. This means that the current project will benefit from one management body and one coordination mechanism as listed below:

High-Level Coordination Mechanism

- This group will operate as a coordination mechanism that includes at Ambassadorial/High-level representation from donor agencies — both those contributing to the current programme and those contributing more broadly to relevant democratic governance programming through bilateral or other means. This mechanism will be convened and managed by the UN-ERSG and will meet periodically to discuss the evolving political environment, share plans and activities, deliberate issues of common concern, negotiate agreed responses, and analyze emerging needs

of 45

and risks. This high-level forum is an important part of donor coordination, with the emphasis on high-level policy development, collaboration and information-sharing.

Project Steering Committee

- As noted earlier, the Project Steering Committee provides a specific policy and decision-making mechanism. The Steering Committee will meet quarterly or more frequently if need be and is responsible for general oversight of programme activities, including financial oversight and approval of funding allocations within the overall budget as recommended by the PMU. It should receive regular reports from the PMU, approve major activities and expenditures, reach consensus and take decisions in any change in the programme work plan, provide ongoing risk analysis, and consider funding for emerging issues. It is facilitated by the PMU, which provides secretariat services. The reports of the Steering Committee will be shared with all donors to the basket fund and their reports will constitute a standing item at meetings of the High Level Coordination Mechanism.

- Small, flexible technical committees can be developed to guide key outputs, in particular the civic education outputs, which may usefully benefit from some form of CSO/Stakeholder Coordination Committee, depending on how implementation proceeds. These could meet on a regular basis to follow implementation progress and make recommendations on key issues. They would also review the annual work plan (including budgetary requirements) before approval by the Steering Committee. The technical committees should also help ensure timely planning and coordination of activities within their sector.

- The time frame for the implementation of the project is from 2013 to 2015. However, as UNIPSIL’s mandate will end in March 2014, the roles and responsibilities within the UN in terms of the programme may need to be clarified. To address issues of transition, the Project document has been designed as co-owned between UNIPSIL and UNDP to allow for seamless follow-on to UNDP leadership once UNISPIL leaves their role will terminate at that date with UNDP continuing to lead project implementation.

SECTION 8: MONITORING AND EVALUATION

In terms of monitoring and evaluation, the programme will be subject to UNDP’s current monitoring and evaluation procedures and any additional policies and procedures agreed to by the implementing agents, the programme partners and UNDP. The Programme will be monitored throughout its duration, reviewed substantively on an annual basis and evaluated in accordance with the requirements of the Steering Committee. The focus of M&E will be at the outcome level to understand the impact the programme has had on the electoral cycle.

All programme activities will be closely monitored by UNDP Country Office. To this effect, a Programme Officer from the UNDP Governance Unit will backstop the programme and support the Chief Technical Advisor in the attainment of the established programme outputs. The project shall be subject to the internal and external auditing procedures laid down in the Financial Regulations, Rules and directives of

of 45

UNDP. The DPA and UNDP Constitutional Focal Points at headquarters will also be mobilised to provide monitoring functions from desk, as well as in-country as required.

The project will be guided by the following documents, which will be produced within the first three months by the Chief Technical Advisor for endorsement and approval by the Steering Committee.

(i) A Monitoring & Evaluation Framework, which finalises the baselines, impact, outcomes and outputs with associated indicators and means of verification as based on the Programme’s Results and Resources Framework.

(ii) A Monitoring & Evaluation Plan, which schedules all major M&E activities

(iii) A Monitoring & Evaluation System that contains tools and templates (e.g. assets and inventory control, financial and narrative reports formats, risk logs and field monitoring forms, and a common system for generating feedback and lessons). The M&E System will also clarify the monitoring, review and evaluation roles and responsibilities at the different levels of the Programme for internal monitoring, monitoring and review committees for external monitoring, and detail the principles of joint monitoring and evaluation.

In accordance with the programming policies and procedures outlined in the UNDP User Guide, the project will be monitored through the following:

Within the annual cycle

- On a quarterly basis, a quality assessment shall record progress towards the completion of key results, based on quality criteria and methods captured in the Quality Management table below.

- An Issue Log shall be activated in Atlas and updated by the Project Manager to facilitate tracking and resolution of potential problems or requests for change.

- Based on the initial risk analysis submitted (see annex 1), a risk log shall be activated in Atlas and regularly updated by reviewing the external environment that may affect the project implementation.

- Based on the above information recorded in Atlas, a Project Progress Report (PPR) shall be submitted by the Project Manager to the Project Board through Project Assurance, using the standard report format available in the Executive Snapshot. This PPR will also be shared with the DPA and UNDP Constitutional Focal Points at headquarters.

- A project Lesson-learned log shall be activated and regularly updated to ensure on-going learning and adaptation within the organization, and to facilitate the preparation of the Lessons-learned Report at the end of the project.

- A Monitoring Schedule Plan shall be activated in Atlas and updated to track key management actions/events.

Annually

of 45

Annual Review Report

- An Annual Review Report shall be jointly prepared by the CTA and Programme Manager shared with the steering Committee, as well as the DPA and UNDP Constitutional Focal Points at headquarters. As minimum requirement, the Annual Review Report shall consist of the Atlas standard format for the QPR covering the whole year with updated information for each above element of the QPR as well as a summary of results achieved against pre-defined annual targets at the output level.

Annual Project Review

- Based on the above report, an annual project review shall be conducted during the fourth quarter of the year or soon after, to assess the performance of the project and appraise the Annual Work Plan (AWP) for the following year. In the last year, this review will be a final assessment. This review is driven by the Project Board and may involve other stakeholders as required. It shall focus on the extent to which progress is being made towards outputs, and that these remain aligned to appropriate outcomes.

Although only required when mandated by partnership protocols, an evaluation of the programme will be undertaken at the end of its period to learn lessons and apply these to possible follow-on assistance activities.

SECTION 8: LEGAL CONTEXT

This programme document shall be the instrument referred to as such in Article 1 of the SBAA between the Government of Sierra Leone and UNDP, signed on the 21st December 1977. Consistent with the Article III of the Standard Basic Assistance Agreement, the responsibility for the safety and security of the executing agency and its personnel and property, and of UNDP’s property in the executing agency’s custody, rests with the executing agency. The executing agency shall:

1. Put in place an appropriate security plan and maintain the security plan, taking into account the security situation in the country where the programme is being carried; and

2. Assume all risks and liabilities related to the executing agency’s security, and the full implementation of the security plan.

UNDP reserves the right to verify whether such a plan is in place, and to suggest modifications to the plan when necessary. Failure to maintain and implement an appropriate security plan as required hereunder shall be deemed a breach of this agreement. The executing agency agrees to undertake all reasonable efforts to ensure that none of the UNDP funds received pursuant to the Programme Document are used to provide support to individuals or entities associated with terrorism and that the recipients of any amounts provided by UNDP hereunder do not appear on the list maintained by the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1267 (1999). The list can be accessed via http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/committees/1267/1267ListEng.htm. This provision must be included in all sub-contracts or sub-agreements entered into under this Project Document.

http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/committees/1267/1267ListEng.htm

of 45

ANNEX 1: TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE CONSTITUTION REVIEW COMMITTEE

Background

Sierra Leone has come a long way from a devastating civil war that left behind a ravaged economy, destruction of physical infrastructure and massive loss of human life. Destruction of social fabrics and mass exodus of skilled human capital created an adverse situation in human conditions, the effect of which will be felt in many years to come. However, a lot has been achieved since the end of the war in 2002 with the concerted efforts of the government of Sierra Leone and international community in putting back the country to normality through a variety of interventions under Judicial sector reform programme, electoral law reform and Public Sector Reform Programme. Good governance and the rule of law have been identified as critical in ensuring that the country does not slip back to the unfortunate history of conflict. In order to have holistic reform, the need for constitutional review becomes imperative. To do that in a post-conflict country like Sierra Leone means to create a conducive political environment that would encourage the evolution of a Constitution that, in all facets of national life, would promote the welfare of the ordinary citizen of the country. Where laws not only have teeth but are equally capable of biting in a manner that would check-mate the excesses of the political class thereby ensuring that infrastructure, goods and services are put at the doorsteps of the ordinary Sierra Leonean, and thus a good quantum of national agitation would have been assuaged.

To this end, during his inaugural speech in January 2013, the President of Republic of Sierra Leone underscored the need to review the 1991 Constitution and also re-examine the recommendations of the Constitution Review Commission submitted in 2008. It was the contention of the President that the country needs to undertake a consultative review of the fundamental law of Sierra Leone, the 1991 Constitution with an overriding aim of promoting the unity and cohesion of the nation and also making it compatible with international standards and best practices. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission also recommended the review of the 1991 Constitution in its report.

Membership

The membership of CRC shall comprise representatives from the key stakeholders such as political parties, democratic institutions, local councils, civil society, gender interest groups, Bar Association, academia, traditional leaders, judiciary and other eminent citizens.

Terms of Reference

The Terms of Reference of the Committee shall be to review the recommendations contained in the Report of the Constitutional Review Commission submitted to Government in January 2008 and to advise Government on the acceptability or otherwise of the recommendations. In the discharge of its mandate, the Committee will be required to do the following:

- Collect views by all practicable means from the general public in and outside Sierra Leone;

- Undertake wide consultations with the public and the relevant social, political and economic groups on its terms of reference;

- Recommend provisions which will promote an open, transparent and democratic society;

of 45

- Examine constitutions of other countries especially the best practices contained therein;

- Examine and recommend any subject-matter of a constitutional nature which is relevant in strengthening multi-party democracy;

- Consider any other matters that might arise during the review process pertaining to the constitution making;

- Examine and recommend on any matter which is connected with or incidental to its terms of reference; and

- The Committee shall submit its report to the Government within eighteen months after it is constituted.

Rules of Procedure for meetings

Venue and number of meetings

- The CRC shall meet for the conduct of its business at least once in a week at the Miatta Conference Centre, Youyi Building Freetown and at such time as the Chairman direct. The CRC may meet at other venue such as regional and district headquarters, towns/capitals as the circumstances may require.

Presiding at meetings

- The Chairman shall preside at all meeting of the CRC except that in his absence, the members present shall select one of their members to preside.

Quorum

- The quorum at meetings of the CRC shall be 1/3 of the Committee members.

Proceedings

Public meetings

- Meetings of the CRC with members of the public, interest groups and other stakeholders shall be held in public unless the CRC determines otherwise.

Private meetings

- All other meetings of the CRC shall be held in private to promote free, frank, and open discussions, sharing of ideas, opinions, experiences and exchange of views among members.

Frequency of the meetings

- The Committee shall meet regularly under the chairmanship of the Constitution Review Committee. The Committee shall also convene such meetings more frequently as and when necessary, taking into account developments related to the constitutional review process. The meetings shall be held at CRC secretariat or such other location, including the regional and district headquarters towns/ capitals, as determined by the Committee.

of 45

Decision making

- The Chairman shall afford every member of the CRC an opportunity to be heard on all issues before or considered by the CRC and in this regard the Chairman must encourage active participation of all members. The CRC shall endeavour to reach its decisions by consensus and the Chairman shall ensure that issues are decided in an atmosphere of consensus and cooperation not competition or confrontation. However, if consensus cannot be reached, the CRC shall decide by a majority of its members present when an issue is decided. In such circumstances, the views of the minority must be recorded.

Minutes and Conclusion of Meeting

The secretariat of the CRC shall prepare the minutes of the Committee’s meeting and endeavour to circulate by email or other agreed mode of delivery to the parties preferably not later than three days before the agreed date of the next scheduled meeting. The members of the CRC shall offer their comments on the minutes which shall then be finalized and adopted.

Work Methodology

In the discharge of its responsibilities, the Review Committee will adopt the following methodology:

- Promote public awareness of its work, public awareness of constitutional issues, stimulate public debate on the constitutional process and promote national ownership of the process through civic education.;

- Facilitate and receive submissions orally, in writing, electronically and in any other manner, on views ideas and opinions of persons within and outside Sierra Leone;

- Organize workshops and meetings in all four regional headquarter towns and fourteen district headquarters targeting specific stakeholders such as civic society, politicians, women groups, youth groups, academia, traditional and religious leaders;

- Hold public and private meetings/hearings to enable the active participation of all Sierra Leoneans in the constitutional review process and encourage members of the public to express themselves in a language of their choice;

- Hold consultations in all districts and in the Western Area of Sierra Leone to obtain views, opinions, ideas from persons from all walks of life including women, youth and disabled on the Constitution;

- Receive, collate and analyze views, ideas and opinions expressed during consultative process;

- Organize and arrange study visits to Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria where some members of CRC will observe practical implementation of comparable provision of the Constitution;

- Request the conduct of research, studies and analysis of the 1991 Constitution, other Constitutions especially those of Commonwealth countries and other constitutional systems for the benefit of CRC;

of 45

- Engage the services of consultants to design and develop information, education and communication(IEC)strategies/materials in the form of television and radio programmes, banners, brochures and posters, and widely disseminate the information and materials with a view to ensure maximum participation in the review process by all sectors of society;

- Organize a validation workshop to consult stakeholders on the tentative findings and recommendations made by the Review Committee;

- Take cognizance of international standards and best practices in the development of Constitution;

- Produce recommendations and the final report.

of 45

ANNEX 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE

Introduction

Within the context of the UN Support to Sierra Leone Constitutional Process project, the Steering Committee will provide a specific policy and decision-making mechanism. The Steering Committee will meet quarterly or more frequently if need be and is responsible for general oversight of project activities, including financial oversight and approval of funding allocations within the overall budget as recommended by the Project Management Unit (PMU). The Steering Committee will receive regular reports from the PMU and the Constitution Review Committee (CRC) and other stakeholders approve major activities and expenditures, reach consensus and take decisions in any change in the programme work plan, provide ongoing risk analysis, and consider funding for emerging issues.

Composition of the Steering Committee

The membership of the Steering Committee shall comprise representatives from the key stakeholders such as political parties, democratic institutions, civil society, judiciary and Basket Fund donors.

Chairs

The Attorney General and Minister of Justice (Chair) The Executive Representative of the Secretary-General and later on the UN Resident and UNDP

Resident Representative Co-chair

Specific Responsibilities

The Steering Committee will perform the following:

Make decisions by consensus on any issues to facilitate the effective management of the project in line with the provisions set out in the UN Support to Sierra Leone Constitutional Process project document;

Provide overall guidance and direction to the project;

Review and approve the annual and the quarterly work plans prepared by the PMU;

Review work progress at the quarterly meetings to be held and follow-up on the implementation of the programme;

Provide recommendations and orientation to the project execution to solve any emerging issues;

Approve any changes needed during project implementation.

Advise on key strategic and policy issues;

Make decisions on revisions of the programme, if required; and

Delegate decision making authority within defined areas.

The Steering Committee Secretariat

PMU will act as the Secretariat to the Steering Committee.

of 45

ANNEX 3. TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE CHIEF TECHNICAL ADVISOR (CTA)

UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

I. Post Information

Post Title: Chief Technical Advisor - UN Constitutional Support Type of contract: FTA Pre-classified Grade: P5 Assignment location: Freetown, Sierra Leone Focal Point : http: jobs.undp.org Duration : One year Supervisor: ERSG/RC Sierra Leone Second Supervisor

II. Organizational Context

Sierra Leone has made notable progress in consolidation of peace and democratic governance since the end of the 11-year civil war in 2002. This includes the successful administration of three elections, including a peaceful transfer of power in 2007 and peaceful presidential, parliamentary, and local council elections in 2012, with significantly less international involvement than the previous elections. However, a lot more remains to be done to address the underlying challenges in the country as well as to solidify democratic norms. The 2012 elections while hailed as a milestone in country’s consolidation of democratic governance also demonstrated deep seated ethno-regional political divisions – that need to be addressed. Despite major progress, young people – who constituted the majority of combatants during the civil conflict and now comprise almost 70% of the population – face a very high unemployment rate, which in turn poses a key challenge to the consolidation of peace.

In early 2013, the Government of Sierra Leone indicated its intention to initiate a major review of the 1991 Constitution. This will be done through an appointed Constitutional Review Committee, comprised of 80 members representing political parties, independent bodies, CSOs, the judiciary and the legislature. The CRC composition and TOR are currently being finalized and the constitutional review process is expected to be formally launched in July 2013.

UNIPSIL has been mandated by the Security Council to support the Sierra Leone constitutional review process, during 2013 and until its scheduled departure in March 2014. To this end, UNISPILUNIPSIL and UNDP have developed a Constitutional Support Project to guide the UN’s support to the process. During this period, in UNIPSIL the Political and Peace Consolidation Section, under the guidance of the Deputy Head of Mission and Head of the Political Affairs Section, is the lead section in providing support to UNDP in implementation of the constitutional review processproject. The CTA (Constitutional Support) will work therefore coordinate and work in close collaboration with the section and UNIPSIL, under the direct supervision of the ERSG/ UN Resident Coordinator. He/ She will be responsible both for providing advice to the ERSG/RC, UNDP, UNIPSIL and UNCT, as well as providing direct technical constitutional advice and programming support under the UNDP-managed

of 45

Project. In coordination with UNIPSIL, Sheshe/he will also work closely with Government of Sierra Leone through the AG office and the CRC and other stakeholders on relevant matters of UN technical support to the constitutional review process.

III. Functions / Key Results Expected

1. Support to Constitutional Review:

Provide, in coordination with UNIPSIL Political Section and in accordance with prevailing best practices and UN policies and procedures, strong technical support and advice to the Constitution Review Committee, its Secretariat and other key stakeholders.

Provide, in coordination with UNIPSIL, advice on ways and means of ensuring wide public participation in the review process, public education and broad inclusivity in the process (in particular of women, young people, people living with disabilities and rural people), and provide technical support and advice to progress activities for that purpose.

Support, in coordination with UNIPSL, the CRC to prepare reports or other necessary documentation, provide advice and written inputs on technical issues and attend meetings of the Constitution Review Committee, as appropriate.

Provide advice to UNIPSIL and UNDP on all relevant constitutional issues.

Coordinate with UNSIPLUNIPSIL and the United Nations Country Team, as part of UNIPSIL's transition, to ensure continued United Nations support to the Constitutional Review process.

Provide technical oversight of the UN Constitutional Support Project including providing inputs to narrative reporting to donors and others, participating in Project Board meetings, providing ad hoc updates to donors, providing advice on project issues as they arise.

Provide technical advisory support to UNDP and UNIPSIL and UNDP staff

Assist, in coordination with UNIPSIL, with the planning and the implementation of constitutional review activities throughout the different phases of the project

Plan and assist periodic evaluation missions making sure to provide necessary assistance and support to the missions.

In close coordination with UNIPSIL, liaise and foster strategic cooperation with other partners to reinforce the dialogue between the stakeholders of the process.

2. Coordination:

The CTA will be responsible for the implementation of activities as well as the supervision of the following:

Ensure with effectiveness the administrative and technical management of the Programme

Supervise and coordinate the actions and activities of the Programme including high level experts and personnel support

Ensure effective cooperation and coordination of all project implementation teams

of 45

Support the Elaboration and implementation of the annual work plan as well as an plan of action for the different activities of the project

Ensure the continued UN support, following UNIPSIL’s withdrawal, and follow up of the project activities.

Coordinate, in collaboration with UNIPSIL and CRC, the organization of seminars and training or reinforce actors/ facilitators capacities building on the constitutional review process

Establish the means of collaboration with potential partners (all stakeholders including donors, etc.), resource mobilization system and appropriate operational partnership arrangements

In close collaboration with CRC, supervise procurement process for equipment required for the constitutional review process

Ensure in all circumstances that the project upholds the values of the UN System, the country’s interests and partners implicated in the process.

3. Reporting:

In close collaboration with UNDP support the elaboration and submission of periodic reports on the progress of the project to the UNDP and its Partners.

In collaboration with UNDP office, plan and coordinate meetings with partners to submit reports or documents in liaison with the constitutional review process.

4. Fundraising/Resource mobilization:

Contribute to the mobilization of funds with partners for additional resources to the constitutional review process.

Provide strong fundraising arguments to donors/or stakeholders.

Perform other relevant duties as required by the ERSG/RC

IV. Impact of Results

The key results have an impact on the project management efficiency and success of the constitutional review process. In particular, the key results have an impact on the delivery of Inclusive, transparent, participatory and peaceful process of constitutional review.

V. Competencies

Corporate Responsibility and Teamwork:

Serves and promotes the vision, mission, values, and strategic goals of UNDP

Displays cultural, gender, religion, race, nationality and age sensitivity and adaptability

Plans, prioritizes, and delivers tasks on time

Results-Orientation and Development Effectiveness:

Plans and produces quality results to meet established goals

Ability to lead strategic planning, results-based management and reporting

Ability to lead implementation, monitoring and evaluation of development programmes and programmes, mobilize resources

of 45

Ability to formulate and manage budgets, manage transactions, conduct financial analysis and reporting

Management and Leadership:

Builds strong relationships with clients, focuses on impact and result for the client and responds positively to feedback

Consistently approaches work with energy and a positive, constructive attitude

Demonstrates good oral and written communication skills

Demonstrates openness to change and ability to manage complexities

Sets clear performance goals and standards; executes responsibilities accordingly

Innovation and Judgment:

Conceptualizes and analyses problems to identify key issues, underlying problems and how they relate

Contributes creative, practical ideas and approaches to deal with challenging situation

Strives for quality client-cantered services (internal/external) when making decisions and taking action

Job Knowledge & Expertise

Demonstrates substantive and technical knowledge to meet responsibilities and post requirements with excellence

Uses ICT and web-based management systems effectively as a tool and resource

Is motivated and demonstrates a capacity to pursue personal development and learn

VI. Recruitment Qualifications

Education Master's degree in Political Science, International Relations, Social Sciences, Management, Administration, Law or related fields.

Experience At least ten years of professional and responsible experience in constitutional, law reform, political analysis and governance are required, with experience in conflict or post-conflict settings an advantage;

Strong experience supporting inclusive and consultative public consultation processes;

Strong drafting, report-writing skills and oral communication skills

High level representational and advisory experience, ideally in a cross-cultural setting;

Experience working with the UN an asset;

Relevant experience in Africa an advantage.

Ability to work under pressure in a multicultural and complex environment;

of 45

Previously experience as CTA in the framework multi donor programmes;

Language Requirements Fluency in English mandatory.

of 45

ANNEX 4. RISK LOG

The following are potential risks associated with the implementation of the project:

# Description Category Probability and Impact

Countermeasures / Management response

Owner Author Date Identified

Last Update

Status

1 Project start-up takes longer than planned, due to difficulties in securing the appropriate expertise

Operational P=Medium I=Medium

DPA and UNDP headquarters available to provide technical advice and support until the Project is mobilised

Programme Assurance

Programme Developer

Programme Inception

2 Full funding for the project is not available

Financial P=Low I=High

Based on current estimates of probable pledges from stable partners, the current complement of project activities looks fairly well covered.

Steering Committee

Programme Developer

Programme Inception

3 The political situation in Sierra Leone becomes more divided and tense and/or the Opposition boycotts the CRC process

Political Strategic

P=High I=High

UNIPSIL (the ERSG in particular), has an important role to play in ensuring that political issues are addressed, and there is constant engagement with political actors. Notwithstanding this, the programme will engage political actors in order to defuse tensions and manage conflict around the this process. Already DPA/UNDP have provided advice to the AG and ERSG to encourage a more politically inclusive process

UN/UNDP Leadership; Programme Assurance

Programme Developer

Programme Inception

4 The CRC loses credibility with the political actors and/or public

Political Strategic

P=Med/Low I=High

Already DPA/UNDP have provided advice to the AG to encourage a more politically inclusive process which will ensure CRC credibility. TA throughout the process will be directed at maintaining CRC legitimacy will all actors

Steering Committee

Programme Developer

Programme Inception

of 45

# Description Category Probability and Impact

Countermeasures / Management response

Owner Author Date Identified

Last Update

Status

5 Needs for the civic education / public consultation components are greater than anticipated in terms of material and financial assistance

Operational/ Financial

P=Med/High I=Med/High

If the needs are assessed as being realistic and necessary, the programme will endeavour to shift resources from other activities as well as to mobilize new resources from donors.

Steering Committee; CTA

Programme Developer

Programme Inception

8 Expertise required for successful implementation of the project teams is not identified

Operational P=Medium I=High

The project will rely on a range of expert selection methods, including use of the DPA/UNDP rosters.

Steering Committee; CTA

Programme Developer

Programme Inception

the republic of sierra leone constitutional review programme · the government of sierra leone to...

Documents