the rice plant-soil-water system crop and environmental sciences division international rice...
TRANSCRIPT
The rice plant-soil-water system
Crop and Environmental Sciences DivisionCrop and Environmental Sciences DivisionInternational Rice Research InstituteInternational Rice Research Institute
Los BaLos Bañños, Philippinesos, Philippines
Water transport soil-plant-atmosphereWater transport soil-plant-atmosphere
Water moves from soil through roots, stems, leaves, to atmosphere
Rate of water flow is f(potential difference, resistance)
Potential unit name Corresponding value
Water height (cm) 1 10 100 1000 15850
pF (-) 0 1 2 3 4.2
Bar (bar) 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 15.85
Pascal (Pa) 100 1000 10000 10000 1585000
Kilo Pascal (kPa) 0.1 1 10 100 1585
Mega Pascal (MPa) 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1.585
Potential of water is positive in “free liquid water”
Potentials in the soil-plant-atmosphere are negative(in flooded rice soil, potential is positive)
Water moves from high potential (top of hill) to low potential (bottom of hill)
Tension is –potential: water moves from low tension to high tension
Potential = 0
Potential is +
Potential = -
Potential = 0
Potential = +
-140
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
ponded water
muddy suspension
impermeable layer
subsoil
ground water table
Pressure head (cm)
Depth (cm)
Water potential in the flooded rice soil
The unsaturated soil“pulls” at the water andpotential is negative
When a paddy rice field falls dry, the soil water potential becomes negative and decreases
Positive water potential Negative water potential
Potential during the growing season in an aerobic soil(aerobic rice, Changping, China, 2002)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
175 200 225 250 275 300Day number
Soil moisture tension (kPa)
Panicle initiation Flowering Harvest
Each soil type has a specific relationship between the content and the potential of water: the pF curve
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Soil water tension (pF= log(h))
Soil water content (cm 3 cm-3)
Clay
Sand
Tension (pF)
Content (cm3 water cm-3 soil)
0.560.46Saturation
(pF = 0)
0.480.30Field capacity
(pF = 2)
0.340.03Wilting point
(pF = 4.2)
0.220.001Air dry
(pF = 7)
ClaySand
0.560.46Saturation
(pF = 0)
0.480.30Field capacity
(pF = 2)
0.340.03Wilting point
(pF = 4.2)
0.220.001Air dry
(pF = 7)
ClaySand
A clay soil stores much water, but at a high tension, so it is difficult for the roots to extract
A sandy soil holds little water, but at a low tension, so it is easy for the roots to extract
A medium-textured, loamy soil, holds intermediate levels of water at intermediate tensions, so there is relatively much water for extraction by roots
No issue for flooded rice soil, but becomes an issue when a soil falls dry during a dry spell
Leaf
Stem
Root
Example of potentials in soil-plant-atmosphere systemPotentials drop with each added resistance
Potential of water in the atmosphere (above leaves) drives the potential transpiration rate, which is f(radiation, wind speed, vapor pressure, temperature).A hot sunny day => pulls hard at water from plant
Potential of water in the soil is determined by the soil properties (texture, SOM,..) and water content:• Clay soil pulls hard at water• Sand soil pulls softly at water• Much water: high potential• Little water: low potentialA dry clay soil pulls hard at water (difficult to take up by roots)
When the soil is too dry (high soil water tension), it becomes too difficult for roots to take up water and water flow in the plant gets reduced:
• Reduced transpiration• Reduced photosynthesis• Reduced leaf area expansion• Leaf rolling• Accelerated leaf death• Spikelet sterility
Drought stressDrought stress
Reduced transpiration as function of soil water tension (IR72)
leaf (Tact/Tpot)
Soil water tension
Link between transpiration and photosynthesis
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1 10 100 1000 10000
Leaf rolling factor (-)
Soil water tension (kPa)
Rolled leaves => less canopy photosynthesis
Leaf rolling
Spikelet sterility
Turner (1986): relationship between leaf
rolling – increased canopy temperature
Spikelet sterility
Less grains
Less yield
Accelerated leaf death
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1 10 100 1000 10000
Drought-induced leaf death factor factor (-)
Soil water tension (kPa)
Dead leaves => less canopy photosynthesis
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1 10 100 1000 10000
Reduction factor (-)
Soil water tension (kPa)
Leaf expansion,
Leaf death
Leaf rolling,Spikelet sterility
Leaf photosynthesis,transpiration
Summary effects of soil water tension; IR72
photosynthesis
Summary effects of drought
Less leaves
Reduced leaf expansion
Less canopy photosynthesis
Less biomass
Reduced partitioning to shoot
Reduced leaf photosynthesis, transpiration
Leaf rollingLess light interception
Spikelet sterility
Less grainsLess yield
Accelerated leaf death
Soil moisture tension
Less canopy transpiration
Effect of timing of drought: most sensitive at flowering
O’Toole, 1984
Moderate drought in early growth stages
Leaf rolling in early growth stages
Severe drought in early growth stages
Severe drought in upper field near Roi Et, Oct. 2004
SMJ RD15
Severe drought