the richter scale: obsolete? misconception 2 geology 101, fall 2012

6
The Richter Scale: Obsolete? Misconception 2 Geology 101, Fall 2012

Upload: bartholomew-owens

Post on 24-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Richter Scale: Obsolete? Misconception 2 Geology 101, Fall 2012

The Richter Scale: Obsolete?

Misconception 2Geology 101, Fall 2012

Page 2: The Richter Scale: Obsolete? Misconception 2 Geology 101, Fall 2012

Richter scale

• Charles F. Richter at Caltech developed the Richter scale to describe earthquake strength in 1934.

• The deflection (maximum movement) of the pen on the seismograph was used to determine magnitude.

Page 3: The Richter Scale: Obsolete? Misconception 2 Geology 101, Fall 2012

Logarithmic scale for earthquakes

• Richter realized that earthquakes varied widely in strength, and to keep the numbers small, he used a logarithmic scale.

• For instance, if the seismograph pen moved 1 mm, that was a magnitude 3 quake; if the pen moved 10 times as much (1 cm), that was a magnitude 4 quake and so forth.

Page 4: The Richter Scale: Obsolete? Misconception 2 Geology 101, Fall 2012

Shortcomings of the Richter scale

• Richter realized that distance reduces earthquake intensity, so for distant earthquakes, he developed a nomograph to account for distance reducing the pen movement.

• Worse, southern California, where Richter worked, had shallow earthquakes that had energy characteristics (slightly) different than many quakes around the world because different rocks transmit quake energy differently.

Page 5: The Richter Scale: Obsolete? Misconception 2 Geology 101, Fall 2012

Moment magnitude (M) scale

• Hiroo Kanamori and others at Caltech in the 1970s developed a logarithmic scale to describe earthquake energy output that depended on knowing factors such as rock strength, area and amount of fault movement.

• This is considered to be a much better scale to determine earthquake energy output.

Page 6: The Richter Scale: Obsolete? Misconception 2 Geology 101, Fall 2012

References• McCalpin, James P. Appendix 1: Earthquake Magnitude Scales. In James P. McCalpin

(ed.), Volume 95: Paleoseismology. 2nd edition. Retrieved from http://www.elsevierdirect.com/companions/9780123735768/casestudies/01~Appendix_1.pdf

• First slide image: Hargrove, Brantley (August 7, 2012). Connection Between Quakes and Underground Frack-water Disposal Looks Solid. In Dallas Observer. Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2012/08/connection_between_quakes_and.php

• Second slide image: South Dakota Geological Survey (n.d.).Richter Scale Graphic Representation. In Earthquakes in South Dakota(1872-2012). Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://www.sdgs.usd.edu/publications/maps/earthquakes/rscale.htm

• Third slide image: US Geological Survey (July 12, 2012). Earthquake Glossary – Richter Scale. In Earthquakes. Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/glossary/?term=Richter%20scale

• Fourth slide image: No author (n.d.). 11.8 How Are Earthquakes Measured? In Lecture 11 – Deformation of Rocks. Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://gomyclass.com/geology10/files/lecture11/html/web_data/file75contents.htm