the science of the innovation processes: an integrated and evolutionary discipline for the education...
TRANSCRIPT
The science of the innovation processes: an integrated and evolutionary discipline for the education of the XXI century’s Engineers
Dr. Laure MOREL, ProfessorDr. Mauricio Camargo, Associate-Professor
Réseau Cartagène d’ingénierie-RCI21 septembre 2010 Metz
INTRODUCTION
- Environmental changes Increasing perception of complexity
- Difficulties in approaching industrial problems
- Management of Innovation have evolve due to :
- industry needs- customers needs
• « what innovation means ? »
• impact on a training program of an Engineering school
INTRODUCTION
• Innovation is a fashionable concept :
* product : to better satisfy needs or to create new ones
* process or organisation : to reduce delay, cost to improve quality and productivity
• Different communities so different models and representations
* lack of understanding or a misunderstanding
* a huge amount of definition about “what innovation is “
INTRODUCTION
For example :
• one consider innovation as a “smooth, well-behaved linear process “ [Rosenberg & al, 86]
IdeaFrom research activities
MarketingDevelopment
• one consider innovation as a cognitive process based on new way of reasoning and acting in an individual or collective or organisational point of view[March & Simon 74], [Callon 94], [Alter 95], [Boucher & al 95]
Production
INTRODUCTION
• one consider innovation as a systemic process allowing adjustments between the industrial system and its environments
The chain-linked model [Kline & Rosenberg 86]
R RESEARCHR R
KNOWLEDGEKK KD
F
F
F
C C CC
I
3 3 3
Potentialmarket
Development Production ClientMarket
f f f f
1 1 12 22
4
4 4
InventionAnd / oranaliticconception
INTRODUCTION
OBSERVATION : an agreement has emerged to consider innovation as a process
Innovation and complexity are linked
New paradigms and new way of acting are needed to face current industrial challenges
PARADIGMS EMERGING AND CHALLENGES
Innovation as a value -creating
process
Scientific framework of an Integrated Approach to Innovation
Systemic logic
Learning and action logic
Paradigm of Complexity
To apprehend
To conceive its existence
To change our representations of the reality and our way of acting
To create value by the quality of the interactions and by the search of a sense given to our action
To integrate
To take advantage of
No permanent and only one explanation of the reality
Knowledge emerges from the interaction between a system and its environment
Knowledge is a project continuously constructed
Constructivist Paradigm
PARADIGMS EMERGING AND CHALLENGES
Systemic logic
Study of the links and the interactions
Integration of various point of view and of the persons
Learning and action logic
To think in our practical
To develop particular model of action for each situation
Knowledge is not given
Innovation as a value -creating
process
Paradigm of Complexity Constructivist Paradigm
Scientific framework of an Integrated Approach to Innovation
TOWARD AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO INNOVATION
technical dimension
organizational dimension
behavioral dimension
cognitive dimension
Control of the performance
Creation of value(financial, culture, apprenticeship, common sense…)
Innovation as the search of a
result
Innovation as a processPARADOX
THE IMPLICATION ON TRAINING IN AN ENGINEERING SCHOOL
Customers
• demand industry
Product
• engineers
« How to do the link »
Research
• paradigms emergence
THE IMPLICATION ON TRAINING IN AN ENGINEERING SCHOOL
• 2 QUESTIONS :
- How do we train people in order to respond to the industry need ?
- what kind of pedagogical methods must be develop to approach complex reality ?
Postulate : to develop a cross cultural attitude
THE IMPLICATION ON TRAINING IN AN ENGINEERING SCHOOL
• 2 MAIN AXES :
- Facilitating access to reasoning where creativity and flexibility have pride of place
- Encouraging observation, common sense, curiosity , interest for the physical and social world and the
willingness to experiment
THE IMPLICATION ON TRAINING IN AN ENGINEERING SCHOOL
• 3 PROPOSALS :
- a learning approach combining project and practical experience
- a multi episodic apprenticeship in order to favor the transfer of methodology and methods within the courses
- the setting up of managerial/entrepreneurial development and personal development supervision
H2: The innovation culture requires educational engineering which promotes "practical understanding « (Schön, 1983), (Camargo & al, 2009)
H1: The innovation dynamic is closely linked to the innovative behaviors developed by individuals (Schumpeter, 1965), (Morel, 1998) , (Diedhiou, 2003), (Bary, 2002), (Batjargal, 2007), (Schwartz & Malach-Pines, 2007).
Engineering Engineering SciencesSciences
Management SciencesManagement Sciences Human SciencesHuman Sciences
Self-learning
Self-learning of languagesSelf-learning and educational information & communication
technologiesMethodological support
Learningthrough action
Industrial projectsAnalysis of practices
Qualitative monitoring
Life of associationsPersonal
development
CoachingCommunicationControlling fearPhilosophyAssessing Potential through Simulation
Figure: Innovation training: Educational structure of the GSI Engineering school
THE IMPLICATION ON TRAINING IN AN ENGINEERING SCHOOL
THE IMPLICATION ON TRAINING IN AN ENGINEERING SCHOOL
• 3 REMARKS :
- our pedagogy is based upon an ever-increasing autonomy of the learners
- teachers gradually turn into an external resource and a help to turn intelligence of knowledge into intelligence of action
- our training should no longer give pride place to order and stability : instability is becoming the driving force of knowledge
A SPECIFIC CONTEXT : THE COMPETITIVENESS CLUSTERS
On July 2005, the French government has decided to grant an official label and to support 66 competitiveness clusters.
These competitiveness clusters concern emerging technological sectors such as nanotechnologies, biotechnologies or microelectronics, but also the more traditional industrial sectors.
What exactly is a competitiveness cluster and what advantages ?The aim of a competitiveness cluster is to concentrate at the same location, the talent incorporated within public and private research units, teaching facilities and the expertise of business enterprises, in order to establish working relationships which develop a cooperation environment and promote partnerships within innovative projects. Universities and enterprises are mobilized, within a public/private partnership to work on new projects.
AN EXAMPLE
A SPECIFIC CONTEXT : THE COMPETITIVENESS CLUSTERS
Lorraine - Materalia
« Innovative materials and intelligent products »
Transport, Biotechnology and Healthcare, IT, images and network, Bio-Agronomics, Chemicals
A SPECIFIC CONTEXT : THE COMPETITIVENESS CLUSTERS
There are 4 key elements for a successful regional cluster:
- a common development strategy
- strong partnerships between the various players
- concentration on highly marketable technologies
- international visibilityTRANSFER AND
INNOVATION WORKSHOPS – TIW
THE SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUNG OF THE TIW PROJECT
The School/Enterprise platform project (Morel & Guidat, 2005)
Innovation Engineering
Knowledge Management
and Innovation
Learning and Innovation
PRODUCT INCUBATEUR CRE@CTION
TECHNOLOGYPLATFORM
SKILLS TRANSFER PROJECT WORKSHOPS
Innovation and creativity tools box
TIW project
New product development tools box
8 months Engineers mission
0BJECTIVES OF THE TIW PROJECT
Improving Innovation By Developing Exchanges Between Universities, SMEs, and the Region
Objectives of the TWI project: to assist SMEs in Lorraine in their innovation dynamic and to contribute to a “learning by doing” pedagogy. To assist SMEs in Lorraine The TIW are designed to gradually integrate SMEs in the knowledge economy by developing their practices of collaboration and networking in order to boost their NPD process.
A “learning by doing” pedagogy A project of modernization or innovation in SMEs is a project that can be tackled in all its dimensions (technical, economical, managerial) on a time compatible with the teaching time (2 semesters) and the industrial constraints.It requires a multidisciplinary and multi-actors confrontation. This favor a learning by doing attitude of the students. Furthermore, the multidisciplinary nature of these projects will be a great opportunity to mix skills becoming from different backgrounds: engineering, management and industry.
SEMESTER 1 (September to January)
Vendredi am
Common courses MIPI workshops
Tous les étudiants (et industriels) concernés par les Ateliers de Transfert ThématiqueMIPI suivent ces formations
Vendredi pmAtelier Projet 1 (AP1)
pour Industriel X
1 Atelier Projet Finalisé = 1 sujet industriel + 1 Manager
Industriel + 1 groupe d’étudiants (3 à 4 étudiants x 2 écoles) + 1 équipe de Managers Ecole (1 enseignant /
chercheur par école)
Vendredi pmAtelier Projet 2 (AP2)
sans Industriel (incubateur)
1 Atelier Incubateur Projet = 1 secteur industriel + 1 groupe d’étudiants (3 à 4 étudiants x 2 écoles) + 1 équipe de Managers
Ecole (1 enseignant / chercheur par école)
Vendredi pmAtelier Projet 3 (AP3)
pour Industriel Y
Par Atelier Projet : Organisation du projet, répartition des tâches, analyse de tendances multi-points de vue, recherche d’informations, … Réunions de travail entre acteurs d’une même école et/ou des différentes écoles concernées avec (ou sans) acteur industriel.
AP1
AP1 AP1
AP 2 AP 2
AP 2 AP 3
AP 3 AP 3
Gestion de Projet
IND X IND Y
School ASchool BSchool C
8 x Vendredi am :
3 x 4 h Pratique de Gestion de Projet3 x 4 h Pratique de Gestion de l’Innovation2 x 4 h Interventions Professionnelles
School D
Un des vendredi après-midi (décembre) sera réservé à une présentation intermédiaire de l’avancement des travaux de chaque Atelier Projet.
???
Basics on management of innovative projects and Project Organization
Application ofthe courses on the problematic
THE TIW PROJECT STRUCTURE
SEMESTRE 2 (January to June)
Vendredi am and pm
Ressources « fixes »et « en réserve » d’Experts(Enseignants, Chercheurs,
Industriels, Institutionnels, …)
School ASchool BSchool CSchool DIndustrial XIndustrial Y, …
Atelier Projetavec Industriel
?
Atelier Projetsans Industriel (incubateur)
?
Ressources Technologiques
Evaluation : Report and oral presentation
Operational implementation of the project
Materalia cluster5000 euros budget
THE TIW PROJECT STRUCTURE
EXAMPLES OF TIW PROJECTS
EXAMPLES OF TIW PROJECTS
THE FOUR CONCEPTSTHE FOUR CONCEPTS
•« SERICA Carbone »• Ecological charter• Ecological message PSA•« Emball’utile »
Results : 52 ideas
EXAMPLES OF TIW PROJECTS
•Evolution of the current products• product design •Usability test
•But also…. A Roadmaping of the technology strategy
EXAMPLES OF TIW PROJECTS
Dechaume MoncharmonJulienDunand NicolasGuironnet de Massas MélodieHay AmandineLaporte GrégoireMarin EdwigeNibourel AdrienRousset Marc
turnover of 13 million €125 employees
Manager: M.Moret
EXAMPLES OF TIW PROJECTS
ContextBroadening
Conceptual issue
A new carrying items bought system
Sheet metalmanufacturing
Prototypes
ContextBroadening
Conceptual issue
A new carrying items bought system
Sheet metalmanufacturing
Prototypes
ContextBroadening
Conceptual issue
A new carrying items bought system
Sheet metalmanufacturing
Prototypes
CONCLUSION
In 2006, 3 PMEs and 2 schools was engaged in the TIW project. In 2009, it represents 20 PMEs and 12 schools.
The TIW project is a tool for igniting, accelerating and facilitating innovation through:
- A better identification and formalization of an industrial problematic of technological development
- A more efficient piloting of the project thanks to the access to competencies and tools that SMEs don’t basically get
-Adapted training sessions for the SMEs employees or managers regarding their project-A progressive integration of the SMEs to the local scientific and technology environment regarding the project needs
- A concrete use of all the methods favoring a collaborative work
- A free access for the SMEs to the Cré@ction technological platform and different kind of resources (training, researches, transfer)
- an opening up toward a culture of relationships and interdisciplinary
- a new perception of complex environment : constraint to creation of value
- a double process of adaptation and of professional ability to improve autonomy
CONCLUSION
For the training of the XXI century’s Engineers we need an Integrated Approach to Innovation.
That’s mean for a pedagogical structure :
“What’s important in engineering education? Making universities and engineering schools exciting, creative, adventurous, rigorous, demanding and empowering environments is more important than specifying curricular detail.”
Charles VestPresident, National Academy of Engineering USAPresident Emeritus, MIT
CONCLUSION