The Syrian Conflict: Chemical weapons and Foreign Intervention: Be or not to be?

In recent months the situation in Syria became more acute. Every day we have been hearing about the incremental amount of victimes among civil population. The members of international society (U. N. O.) and American government are confused about the situation which created in the Arabian country. Each member of United Nations proposes his variant of solving this global question. In this article I would like to compare their views on this situation.

Syria has been at the Civil war since 2011 when the opposition decided to overthrow the Presidential regime of Bachar Asad. For the first time chemical attack on its territory was carried out on the 19th of March 2013 near the Han-Al-Asal. The rebellion charged the governmental troops with this attack because of which 15 were killed. For the solution of this dispute Arabian goverenment sent a proposal to the U. N.O. in which they asked to send the International inspectors to their country. But the chemical attacks were continued until the 21st of August.

According to the Gurdian newspaper: «all Syrian chemical weapons wil be placed under the international control and destroyed in the process». This decision was accepted after the meeting of U. S. secretary John Carry with his Russian collegue Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov. In this Gurdian article which is called «Syria Crysis: US and Russia agree chemical weapons deal». Here I can't find the information about the target date of the final stand of this agreement.

In the American daily newspaper New York Times I found the information about the date of the final step. «… Syria's arsenal of chemical weapons to be removed or destroyed by the middle of 2014». Remind you that American government supports the idea of the foreign intervention.

The United Nations Security Council supports the idea of Syrian military Intervention. Our country expressed the disappointment of any military actions in this country. This point of view was mentioned by the Russian President Poutin during his interview to the New York Times. He proposed to develop a compromise plan for their general future. He also noted that American government should follow the law «Force is permitted only in self –defense or by the decision of the Security Council». He also marked that USA haven't long-termed interest in the Arabian conflict. At the end of the Interview Poutin mentioned that Americans, Russians, Syrians are equal.

From my point of view that Russia U. N. O. and USA can't finish this Civil war. It is the inner affair of Syrian oppostion and their government

Bibliography

The Guirdian Syria crisis: US and Russia agree chemical weapons deal

NY TIMES Kerry Cites Clear Evidence of Chemical Weapon Use in Syria

NY TIMES U.S. and Russia Reach Deal to Destroy Syria’s Chemical Arms

Poutin's Interview For NY Times

Andrey Kuznetsov