the therapeutic relationship within clinical social work practice sow6425 professor nan van den...

22
THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Upload: wesley-carpenter

Post on 19-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK

PRACTICE

SOW6425

Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Page 2: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

FEATURES OF THE SOCIAL WORKER’S MANAGEMENT OF THE CLINICAL RELATIONSHIP

Attention to:

Transference

Countertransference

Boundaries

Sustainment

Modeling

Balancing support and demand behaviors

Page 3: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

SUSTAINMENT

• What the Worker Does

• Listens actively and sympathetically

• Conveys a continuing attitude of good will

• Demonstrates consistency in the relationship

• Directly expresses confidence or esteem

• Non-verbally communicates interest, attentiveness

• Realistically reassures the client about potential for goal

achievement

• Realistically encourages the client to persist

• Possibly offers environmental support

Page 4: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

What This Technique Does for the Client

•Promotes a confiding relationship

•Instills a sense of the worker’s competence and caring

•Provides an antidote to alienation

•Enhances morale and the determination to persist

•Inspires and maintains the expectation of help

•Creates a setting where confrontation can effectively take place

Page 5: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

SELF-DISCLOSURE

•Defined as sharing with the client opinions, thoughts, feelings, reactions to the client, and personal experiences

•Self-involving disclosure - Commenting on the process of the worker/client interactions

•Personal disclosure - Sharing a personal experience that may be relevant to the work being done (this can be risky)

Page 6: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

TRANSFERENCE

• Defined as all client reactions, conscious and unconscious, to the social worker

• These include reactions based on experiences with similar types of people in the client’s past, and on here-and-now characteristics of the social worker

Page 7: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Positive vs. Negative Transference

• Positive - the client is attracted to the practitioner, which can facilitate the engagement process

• Negative - characterized by such feelings as anger, distrust, or fear that impede the client’s participation in the intervention

• Positive transference does not necessarily facilitate the client’s achievement of goals

• Negative transference does not necessarily prevent goal achievement

Page 8: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

COUNTERTRANSFERENCE

Specific and generally conscious attitudes and

tendencies that a social worker has about a range of clients

Ex.: being drawn to working with children or having an aversion to older adults)

Page 9: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Common Signs of Countertransference Reactions

• Dreading or eagerly anticipating a client

• Differing promptness in responding to client’s needs

• Thinking excessively about a client during non-work hours

• Having trouble understanding a client’s problems

• Being bored with a client

• Feeling angry with a client for nonspecific reasons

• Being unduly impressed with a client

• Feeling defensive or hurt by a client’s criticisms

• Performing tasks for clients that they are capable of doing for

themselves

• Feeling uncomfortable about discussing certain topics with a

client

Page 10: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Managing Countertransference Reactions

• Be aware of your emotional and physical needs as much as possible– Be wary of obtaining too much personal gratification at the

expense of a client

• Understand the client’s cultural and community standards of behavior, so as to appropriately assess behavior in those contexts– Ex.: Nonverbal communication cues or silence. Is it culturally

syntonic?

• When appropriate, selectively use self-disclosure with the client to process countertransference feelings. – It is important for some clients to learn that negative feelings

can be contained and processed

Page 11: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Boundaries

• Boundaries are the generally unspoken rules that we internalize about the physical and emotional limits of our relationships with other people.

• They protect our privacy and reflect our individuality.

• We differentially construct boundaries to facilitate our desire to be close to, or separate from, others.

• Each person’s boundaries are unique; we covertly communicate them to suit our assumptions and intentions about particular relationships.

Page 12: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Aspects of Boundaries

• Contact time: How much time is appropriate to spend in the company of the client?

• Difference if face to face or via phone?

• Types of information: What is the appropriate range of topics to discuss with the client?

• social topics, politics, religion, sex?

• Physical closeness/proximity: • Seating distance and arrangement of chairs?

• Physical contact allowed?

• Range of non-verbal communications is appropriate?

Page 13: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Aspects of Boundaries (cont.)

• Territory. To which of my environmental spaces does the client have access? – Is he or she restricted from others? – Can we only meet at the agency? – What about her home, community settings, recreational

settings?

• Emotional space. To what extent am I willing to share my feelings about sensitive topics with the client? – About what topics will we be expected to share feelings?

Page 14: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Benefits to Clients of Clear Boundaries

• A relationship in which the client feels affirmed and respected

• A predictable environment in which the client is likely to feel more comfortable sharing personal information

• A basis from which to determine whether and when the social worker can cross certain boundaries.

• Boundary crossing implies a conscious and appropriate effort to “adjust” the therapeutic relationship toward greater intimacy– Ex: Attend a graduation,marriage or award celebration

Page 15: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Benefits to Clients of Clear Boundaries (cont.)

• Boundary violation is an inappropriate entry into a person’s privacy and space.– If it is not pertinent, it is impertinent

• For some clients the external structure produced by clear boundaries helps to maintain a clearer internal ego structure.

Page 16: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Benefits to The Social Worker of Clear Boundaries

• Role clarity regarding the range and limits of clinical activities

• A basis from which to make decisions about how and when to cross physical or psychological boundaries

• A means of preventing burnout by avoiding role overload

• Physical safety, when territorial boundaries are maintained

Page 17: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Warning Signs of Possible Boundary Violations

• Intrusion into the client’s territory (physical or geographic)

• Some types of self-disclosure– Ex.: How will what you share benefit the client?

– What is your motivation for self-disclosure?

• Being overly “social” with clients

• Investigating certain details of clients’ personal lives

• Sharing information about a client with an outside party

• Loaning, trading, or selling items to a client

• Accepting or giving gifts

• Fluid boundaries between home and work environments may

indicate that the social worker is at-risk for job burnout

Page 18: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Factors To Consider When Assessing One’s Own Boundary Conduct

• The functioning level of the client – His or her ability to use good judgment

• The client’s history in relationships– Patterns of behavior and judgment

• The history of this particular client/worker relationship– What patterns of interaction have been established– Will a boundary crossing activity by the social worker be growth-

enhancing or a setback for the client?

• Cultural norms of both the worker and client.

• Legal liabilities

• The NASW Code of Ethics

Page 19: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Managing Boundary Dilemmas

• Set clear boundaries with clients at the beginning of a working alliance

• Clarify boundaries with the client over time, as they will change

• Consider the preservation of the client’s privacy to be a major guiding value.

• Secure the client’s informed consent for all service activities

• Use peer consulation and formal supervision routinely

Page 20: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Curative Factors in All Practice Interventions

• Perception of practitioner, by client, as competent and caring– Therapeutic alliance

• “Special setting” of seeking therapy promotes client’s sense of safety and expectation of help

• Interventions and procedures are based on an rationale which is understandable to the client – They include an optimistic view of human nature.

• Practitioner is “congruent” with client’s perception of problem and world view– Practitioner’s ongoing attention too client’s frame of reference

• Client is given new opportunities for enhancing mastery

Page 21: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Curative Factors in Practice (cont.)

• Miller, Duncan and Hubble (2005):– Client characteristics associated with clinical

outcome (account for 40% of outcome):• Nature of the problem• Motivation• Participation

– Quality of therapeutic alliance (30%)– Guiding theory or model (15%)– Placebo effect (15%)

Page 22: THE THERAPEUTIC RELATIONSHIP WITHIN CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SOW6425 Professor Nan Van Den Bergh, PhD, LCSW

Curative Factors in Practice (cont.)

• Carkoff and Truax: Predictors to client retention in treatment:

– Empathy– Congruence– Genuineness