the value propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 ·...

28
The Value Proposition Kingspan Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions

Upload: others

Post on 15-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

The ValueProposition

Kingspan CostOptimal EnergySaving BuildingSolutions

Page 2: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

2

The ValueProposition

Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutionsprovide many compelling advantages to the different property stakeholders:they consume less energy, they emit less carbon dioxide and they areenvironmentally responsible over their lifetime, but the perception is that thesetypes of buildings carry substantial capital cost premiums.

Kingspan Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions can deliver minimumcapital and lifetime operation costs for a building.

LessCapital Cost

HigherReturn on

Investment

Building designsthat reduce bothwhole building capitalcost and lifecycleoperational cost.

What are Cost Optimal EnergySaving Building Solutions?

Page 3: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

3

Contents

The Value Proposition 4

The Green Agenda 10Why do we need Cost Optimal EnergySaving Building Solutions?

Property Stakeholder Advantages 10Who Benefits?

Route to Net-Zero Energy Buildings 12Three-step Process 14

A ‘Holistic’ Design Approach 16

Exemplar Case Studies 17Retail Warehouse 18Large Supermarket 20Speculative Office 22Distribution Warehouse 24

Green Building Ratings 26BREEAM 26LEED 27

HigherRental Income

EnhancedGreen Building

Ratings

Reduced Heating and

Cooling Loads LowerLifetime

Operating Costs

Page 4: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

The ValueProposition

4

Kingspan CostOptimal Energy SavingBuilding Solutionscan offer...

For over 40 years, we at Kingspan Insulated Panels have pushedthe boundaries of the building envelope, creating the world’smost advanced, high performance systems.Through our knowledge and innovation and world-class technical expertise, we can providefuture-proofed Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions to help architects and designteams realise affordable, energy efficient and sustainable buildings.

Sample reports carried out by AECOM, along with advice onhow Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions can beachieved, are available from Kingspan Technical Services on:

t: 0800 587 0090e: [email protected]

Page 5: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

The ValueProposition

5

less capital cost...Kingspan has proven that the integration of an enhanced building envelopewith a holistic design approach that identifies the most cost-effective wholebuilding specification, often results in a reduction in capital cost.

Page 6: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

with a higher returnon investment...Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions that have a capital cost uplift providesignificant operational cost reductions and offer rapid return on investment.

6

The ValueProposition

Page 7: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

lifetime operationalcost savings...Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions feature envelope systems thatmaintain their thermal performance over time, limiting the occupiers’ exposure toescalating operating costs over the lifetime of the building.

7

The ValueProposition

Page 8: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

8

The ValueProposition

a future-proofedbuilding...Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building Solutions drive higher rental income, maximiseoccupancy levels, reduce operating costs, enhance asset value and minimise the riskof rising fuel costs to provide ‘future-proofed’ buildings.

Page 9: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

and enhancedBREEAM/LEEDratings.Additional BREEAM / LEED credits can be achieved, enhancing green buildingcredentials and providing market differentiation.

9

The ValueProposition

Page 10: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

10

The UK needs Cost Optimal Energy SavingBuildings to minimise the financial impact ofrising fuel costs in buildings therefore it isessential to reduce lifetime operational costs.

People cause buildings to consume energy. We spend

approximately 90% of our life in buildings. The UK aims to cut

greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80%, from the 1990

baseline by 2050.

Buildings in the UK account for almost 40% of the greenhouse gas

emissions released in the UK’s atmosphere. Building Regulations

Part L 2013 have implemented a 9% improvement in allowable

carbon emissions over the 2010 standard for non-domestic

buildings. From April 2018 it will be unlawful to let commercial

properties with an EPC rating of F or G (the lowest two grades of

energy efficiency). BREEAM requirements are becoming mandatory

for some councils in the UK while other property owners are

stipulating their own BREEAM requirements.

Transportation

24%

Exports

3%

Waste

3%

Agriculture& Land Use

9%Industry

23%

UK sector carbonemissions:

The building sector isthe largest producer ofcarbon dioxide in the

United Kingdom.Source: www.gov.uk.

Buildings

38%

Why do we need Cost OptimalEnergy Saving Building Solutions?

Therefore, the need to reduce energy consumption and carbon

emissions are significant issues for businesses. Holistic building

design, sustainable construction and the optimal operation of

buildings are now the top priority of regulatory, property investment,

tenant and individual corporate agendas.

UK Gas Price Forecast

0.0002010

Normalised Ofgem average

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055Years

£/kW

h

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

UK Electricity Price Forecast

0.0002010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055

Years

£/kW

h

0.050

0.100

0.150

0.200

0.250

0.300

National Grid Normalised Ofgem average National Grid

The GreenAgenda

Page 11: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

11

WhoBenefits?

Source, modified: “The Business Case for Green Building.A Review of the Costs and Benefits for Developers, Investorsand Occupants.” World Green Building Council, 2013.

Property StakeholderAdvantages

Higherselling price

Lower designand construction

costs

Marketdifferentiation

Fastersales

Improved healthand reducedabsenteeism

Increased staffproductivity

OccupiercomfortReduced

downtime

Loweroperational

costs

Lowermaintenance

costs

Slowerdepreciation

Abilityto securefinance

Lowerrefurbishment /

renovation costs

Enhancedbusiness image

Legislation (EPC)& CSR compliance

Lowertransaction

fees

Rapid ROI

Increasedmarket value

Reduced vacancies

Lower exit yield

Increasedoccupancy rates

DeveloperWhy should I build a Cost OptimalEnergy Saving Building?

Tenant / OccupierWhy should I lease a Cost OptimalEnergy Saving Building?

OwnerWhy would I want to own aCost Optimal Energy Saving Building?

Page 12: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

12

Part LRegulatory Compliance

20%Carbon Reduction

40%Carbon Reduction

BREEAM†

Pass > Good > Very Good

LEED Certified

LEED Silver

LEED Gold

BREEAM†

ExcellentBREEAM†

Outstanding

EnvelopeFirst &Optimised Building Services

■ Building type, orientation and location.

■ Optimal envelope considering

- Thermal: U-values, airtightness and thermal bridges.

- Daylighting: heat loss, solar gain and daylight factor.

■ Optimal building services considering lighting design,heating system, cooling system, hot water and BuildingManagement System (controls).

■ Insulation to help further reduce heat loss/gainconsidering the envelope insulation and the internalbuilding services insulation (e.g. duct/pipe insulation).

■ Installation of Low or Zero Carbon (LZC) technologiessuch as solar photovoltaics*, solar air heating*,solar thermal*, heat pump technology*, wind turbines*and combined heat and power (CHP), etc.

*Available from Kingspan.

STEP

1Insulate & GenerateIntegrated LZC Technologies

STEP

2

Route to Net-ZeroEnergy Buildings

†BREEAM UK New Construction 2011 Method.

Part L2010 Compliant Part L

2013 Compliant 20%Less Carbon 40%

Less Carbon

Page 13: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

13

50%Carbon Reduction

Net-Zero EnergyBuildings

LEED Platinum

■ Enhance LZC technologies already installed.

■ Introduce other LZC technologies.

■ Invest in off-site energy saving schemes(known as ‘allowable solutions’ in the UK).

Net-Zero EnergyBuildings

STEP

3

We have now entered into an era of energyefficiency and financial returns, where energysaving buildings are designed, constructed,operated and maintained with minimal cost.

Energy efficiency must always be addressed before considering

renewable energy. In order to achieve a cost optimal energy saving

building design it is essential that annual energy consumption is

minimised before incorporating low or zero carbon technologies.

“By applying Kingspan’s three-stepprocess of EnvelopeFirst &Optimised Building Services,Insulate & Generate and Net-ZeroEnergy Buildings, it is possible toachieve a Cost Optimal EnergySaving Building Solution.”

Route to Net-ZeroEnergy Buildings

Pushingthe Envelope

50%Less Carbon

BREEAMLEED

Net-ZeroEnergy Building

Page 14: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

14

The first step, EnvelopeFirst & Optimised Building Services,

optimises the insulation, airtightness, heat loss/gain and daylight

design of the building envelope for its intended life, while also

ensuring the building’s services are geared to energy efficient

operation. It is of utmost importance that the building envelope is

appropriate before embarking on other energy efficient measures

as the building envelope tends to last the life of the building.

It is mandatory to get the design correct to ensure low operational

cost for the entire lifetime of the building.

The envelope must offer thermal performance suitable to the local

climate but it is not just the building envelope that must be

considered at this stage, it is important to take a holistic approach

to energy efficiency of internal plant. Important elements such as a

building’s daylighting design must always be carefully considered,

taking location and climate into account. Kingspan’s daylighting

systems can be incorporated into building designs to further

decrease energy consumption, by reducing the need for electric

lighting.

Taking a holistic approach, the envelope and the internal heating

and cooling system should be designed simultaneously while

always considering cost. The size of the heating and cooling

system depends very much on the building envelope and it has

been found that improving the efficiency of the building envelope

reduces the size of internal systems and hence reduces their cost.

This also results in heating/cooling energy consumption reduction.

This approach often results in a lower capital cost for the building

envelope and heating/cooling system combined.

Energy efficient internal building services with intelligent controls

should also be included at this stage. Kingspan Insulated Panels’

building envelope products and solutions provide enhanced

thermal conductivity with low air permeability to ensure thermal

performance robustness throughout the building’s lifecycle.

The wide range of Kingspan roof, wall and façade insulated panel

systems, including daylighting, come in various colours and finishes

to suit any design requirement.

EnvelopeFirst& Optimised Building Services

The second step is called ‘Insulate & Generate’. At this stage,

additional enhancements to the building envelope and/or internal

duct/pipework are introduced and low or zero carbon technology

systems are added to further reduce its overall energy footprint.

Low or zero carbon technologies such as Kingspan Roof Mounted

PV Systems are perfectly suited to help reduce energy bills for

buildings with large roof area. Likewise, Kingspan Sol-Air, a thermal

air heating insulated panel system that channels passive solar heat

gain into the heating system, hence reducing its energy

consumption, is perfectly suited for buildings with fresh air

requirements. Other buildings may require different solutions,

including solar thermal, wind and even heat pump technologies,

all of which are available from one of the other divisions of

Kingspan.

The energy saving solutions selected at this stage depend on a

number of variables including cost-effectiveness, building type,

internal demands, orientation, geographical location and climate.

Insulate & Generate- Integrated LZC Technologies

STEP

1STEP

2

Three-stepProcess

Route to Net-ZeroEnergy Buildings

“Building insulation is the mostcost-effective solution to reduceenergy and greenhouse gases.”

Source: McKinsey Global Institute.

Page 15: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

15

The final step is called ‘Net-Zero Energy Buildings’. The purpose of

this stage is to ensure that the overall annual performance of the

building balances out. This usually involves enhancing the

renewable energy technologies already incorporated in the building,

and may require investment in off-site energy saving schemes

called ‘allowable solutions’ in the UK.

Net-Zero Energy Buildings(NZEBs)

STEP

3

Three-stepProcess

Route to Net-ZeroEnergy Buildings

For business and building owners Kingspan Energy, a sub-division

of Kingspan Insulated Panels, offers the opportunity to maximise

the use of the roof space thus reducing their energy costs and

enhancing the value of their property without the need for any upfront

capital outlay. The 100% funded solution provided by Kingspan

Energy involves no upfront cost or capital risk to the end client.*

Effectively, in return for a 25 year lease on the roof space,

Kingspan Energy will 100% capitally fund, design, project-manage,

install and maintain a bespoke optimised Roof Mounted PV System.

The electricity generated by the system will be available to the host

company at lower rates than would otherwise be supplied from

the grid. As a result, the client will have the advantage of fixed

electricity costs, indexed to RPI (Retail Price Index), rather than

being exposed to volatile annual utility inflation rates.

*Note: the client is also able to self-fund the investment if preferred.

Having applied the steps above to reach a given target it is

necessary to calculate the lifetime operational cost by incorporating

the cost associated to rising fuel costs and replacement of internal

plant (keeping in mind an improved fabric will reduce the cost of

internal plant). If the process is completed to reach different carbon

targets it is then possible to calculate a Return on Investment (ROI),

Net-Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR).

Client Commitment:Client provides rooftoplease to Kingspan Energyfor 25 years.

Our Commitment:100% capital funding forthe rooftop solar PV system.

Provide 25 year combinedKingspan roof and solar PVsystem guarantee.

System performance andmaintenance.

Client Benefits:Reduced electricity costsfrom Day One.

Future-proofed energy costsin line with RPI inflation index.

25 year combined Kingspanroof and solar PV systemguarantee.

Our Benefits:25 year client rooftop lease.

Government Green TariffIncentive.

Income from Power Purchase Agreements (PPA)- client and utility.

Page 16: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

16

Holistic Building Design Inputs

Holistic building design concentrates on the design of the whole building rather thanjust focusing on a specific area, such as the design of the building envelope only.

Using a multidisciplinary collaboration approach it is possible to

design more accurately, more efficiently and at optimum cost.

For example, enhancing the building envelope provides the

opportunity to downsize internal building services, thereby often

reducing the capital cost for the whole building when costs

associated to the reduced plant size exceed the costs associated

to the enhanced envelope.

Holistic design is mandatory to reduce to a minimum the amount

of energy consumed. It is essential that various elements of a

building are designed in parallel to minimise unnecessary energy

consumption over the buildings lifecycle.

A ‘Holistic’Design Approach

“The building envelope is critical for reducingbuilding energy loads. It is the starting pointfor energy efficient buildings and the maindeterminant of the amount of energy requiredto heat, cool and ventilate.”Federal R&D Agenda for Net-Zero Energy,High-Performance Green Buildings Report, October 2008.

Geographicallocation

Buildingorientation

Buildingenvelope

Demands(zones)

Coolingsystem

Auxillary(fans, pumps,

etc)

Heatingsystem

Lightingdesign

Hot watersystem

Low / zerocarbon

technologies

Page 17: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

17

The calculations were based on four different building types:

Retail Warehouse, Speculative Office, Large Supermarket and

Distribution Warehouse, in three locations: London, Manchester

and Newcastle.

Each scenario was calculated using three starting building fabric

standards: backstop, notional and enhanced.

Backstop: Less InsulationRoof = 0.25 W/m2K / Wall = 0.35 W/m2K

Notional: Medium InsulationRoof = 0.18 W/m2K / Wall = 0.26 W/m2K

Enhanced: More Insulation Roof = 0.15 W/m2K / Wall = 0.20 W/m2K

Results are dependent on various parameters such as building

type, location, orientation, etc.

Having applied an envelope, a building specification is assigned

based on cost-effectiveness (applying the most cost-effective

changes first) to develop the capital cost model. Lifetime

operational costs are then calculated. It is then possible to

recognise financial benefits of various building specifications over

others in terms of Net-Present Value (NPV), Return on Investment

(ROI) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR).

Kingspan Insulated Panels has carried out extensive research in conjunction with AECOM,a world leading building design consultancy, to identify the positive impact of more efficientbuilding envelopes for buildings in various parts of the UK.

ExemplarCase Studies

Return on Investment (ROI) is a performance measure used to

evaluate the efficiency of an investment, or to compare the

efficiency of a number of different investments. To calculate ROI,

the benefit (return) of an investment (net of initial cost of investment)

is divided by the cost of the investment; the result is expressed as a

percentage or a ratio.

Net Present Value (NPV) is the difference between the present

value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows.

NPV is used in capital budgeting to analyze the profitability of an

investment or project.

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is the discount rate often used in

capital budgeting that makes the net present value of all cash flows

from a particular project equal to zero. Generally speaking,

the higher a project’s internal rate of return, the more desirable it is

to undertake the project. As such, IRR can be used to rank several

prospective projects a firm is considering. Assuming all other

factors are equal among the various projects, the project with the

highest IRR would probably be considered the best and

undertaken first.

For further information see:

http://www.kingspanpanels.co.uk/why-kingspan/value-

proposition/

Holistic Building Design Methodology

Developcapital costmodel

Developwhole lifecost model

Rank buildingimprovements

in order of cost-effectiveness

IdentifyCost Optimal

Energy SavingBuildingSolution

Developmodels foreach of the

54 scenarios:3 locations

6 carbon targets3 envelopestandards

Developthermalmodel

Select building type,location and orientation

Page 18: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

Enhance

d

Capital Cost: £3.508m

Enhance

d

Capital C

ost: £3.5

09m

18

Part L 2010Regulatory Compliance

Part L 2013Regulatory Compliance

20%Carbon Reduction

18

ExemplarCase Studies

RetailWarehouse

Capital: £3.508mkgCO2/m2/yr: 32.7EPC: B28BREEAM* Ene 01: 4

Capital: £3.509mkgCO2/m2/yr: 30.1EPC: B26BREEAM* Ene 01: 6

Capital: £3.562mkgCO2/m2/yr: 26.0EPC: A22BREEAM* Ene 01: 11

Backs

top

Capital C

ost: £3.6

14m

Enhance

d

Capital C

ost: £3.5

62m

1.4% reduced capital costand NPV up to £213,046over 40 years

■ Capital Cost: £1,000 increase■ NPV: Up to £17/m2 (40 years)■ IRR: Up to 321%■ ROI: Up to 10,744.9%■ EPC: From B28 to B26■ BREEAM Ene 01: From 4 to 6 credits

Building ParametersHeated (20°C) and cooled (23°C), 8am to 6pm,7 days per week with a floor area of 4,900m2.Located in London.

Typical Retail Warehouse Buildinggoing from Part L 2010 to

Part L 2013using an enhanced envelopeachieves the following:

*BREEAM UK New Construction 2011. For LEED contributions, please contact Kingspan Technical Department.

Page 19: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

19

40%Carbon Reduction

50%Carbon Reduction

Net-Zero EnergyBuilding

19

ExemplarCase Studies

RetailWarehouse

Capital: £3.754mkgCO2/m2/yr: 19.6EPC: A17BREEAM* Ene 01: 13

Capital: £3.805mkgCO2/m2/yr: 16.3EPC: A14BREEAM* Ene 01: 14

Capital: £3.923mkgCO2/m2/yr: 0EPC: **BREEAM* Ene 01: **

**Confirmation of the impact of allowable solutions on EPCs and BREEAM credits is awaited.

Part L2010

Part L2013

20%improvement

40%improvement

50%improvement

NZEB

Carbon Emissions

Compliance

Cap

ital

Co

st (£

m)

Car

bo

n (k

gC

O2/

m2 /

yr)

3.30

3.40

3.50

3.60

3.70

3.80

3.90

4.00

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Capital Cost

Page 20: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

20

ExemplarCase Studies

LargeSupermarket

Capital: £3.511mkgCO2/m2/yr: 35.9EPC: B32BREEAM* Ene 01: 0

Capital: £3.525mkgCO2/m2/yr: 33.0EPC: B30BREEAM* Ene 01: 4

Capital: £3.575mkgCO2/m2/yr: 28.8EPC: B26BREEAM* Ene 01: 8

*BREEAM UK New Construction 2011. For LEED contributions, please contact Kingspan Technical Department.

Enhance

d

Capital Cost: £3.511m

Enhance

d

Capital C

ost: £3.5

25m

Part L 2010Regulatory Compliance

Part L 2013Regulatory Compliance

20%Carbon Reduction

Backs

top

Capital C

ost: £3.6

18m

Enhance

d

Capital C

ost: £3.5

75m

1.2% reduced capital costand NPV up to £292,088over 40 years

■ Capital Cost: £14,000 increase■ NPV: Up to £9/m2 (40 years)■ IRR: Up to 16.7%■ ROI: Up to 223.7%■ EPC: From B32 to B30■ BREEAM Ene 01: From 0 to 4 credits

Building ParametersHeated (20°C) and cooled (23°C), 8am to 6pm,7 days per week with a floor area of 5,100m2.Located in Newcastle.

Typical Large Supermarket Buildinggoing from Part L 2010 to

Part L 2013using an enhanced envelopeachieves the following:

Page 21: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

21

ExemplarCase Studies

LargeSupermarket

Capital: £3.796mkgCO2/m2/yr: 21.5EPC: A20BREEAM* Ene 01: 11

Capital: £3.883mkgCO2/m2/yr: 17.9EPC: A16BREEAM* Ene 01: 11

Capital: £4.017mkgCO2/m2/yr: 0EPC: **BREEAM* Ene 01: **

40%Carbon Reduction

50%Carbon Reduction

Net-Zero EnergyBuilding

Part L2010

Part L2013

20%improvement

40%improvement

50%improvement

NZEB

Carbon Emissions

Compliance

Cap

ital

Co

st (£

m)

Car

bo

n (k

gC

O2/

m2 /

yr)

3.20

3.30

3.40

3.50

3.60

3.70

3.80

3.90

4.20

4.10

4.00

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

50

45

40

35

Capital Cost

**Confirmation of the impact of allowable solutions on EPCs and BREEAM credits is awaited.

Page 22: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

2222

ExemplarCase Studies

SpeculativeOffice

Capital: £3.120mkgCO2/m2/yr: 20.4EPC: B35BREEAM* Ene 01: 0

Capital: £3.142mkgCO2/m2/yr: 18.0EPC: B31BREEAM* Ene 01: 6

Capital: £3.178mkgCO2/m2/yr: 16.3EPC: B30BREEAM* Ene 01: 8

*BREEAM UK New Construction 2011. For LEED contributions, please contact Kingspan Technical Department.

Enhance

d

Capital Cost: £3.120m

Enhance

d

Capital C

ost: £3.1

42m

Part L 2010Regulatory Compliance

Part L 2013Regulatory Compliance

20%Carbon Reduction

■ Capital Cost: £22,000 increase■ NPV: Up to £10/m2 (40 years)■ IRR: Up to 12.5%■ ROI: Up to 112.6%■ EPC: From B35 to B31■ BREEAM Ene 01: From 0 to 6 credits

Building ParametersHeated (22°C) and cooled (24°C), 7am to 7pm,5 days per week with a floor area of 4,500m2

(3 floors). Located in Manchester.

Typical Speculative Office Buildinggoing from Part L 2010 to

Part L 2013using an enhanced envelopeachieves the following:

Page 23: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

2323

ExemplarCase Studies

SpeculativeOffice

Capital: £3.247mkgCO2/m2/yr: 12.2EPC: A23BREEAM* Ene 01: 11

Capital: £3.275mkgCO2/m2/yr: 10.2EPC: A19BREEAM* Ene 01: 12

Capital: £3.342mkgCO2/m2/yr: 0EPC: **BREEAM* Ene 01: **

40%Carbon Reduction

50%Carbon Reduction

Net-Zero EnergyBuilding

Backs

top

Capital C

ost: £3.2

35m

Enhance

d

Capital C

ost: £3.2

47m

7.8% reduction inboiler size

Part L2010

Part L2013

20%improvement

40%improvement

50%improvement

NZEB

Carbon Emissions

Compliance

Cap

ital

Co

st (£

m)

Car

bo

n (k

gC

O2/

m2 /

yr)

2.95

3.00

3.05

3.10

3.15

3.20

3.25

3.30

3.40

3.35

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

27

24

21

Capital Cost

**Confirmation of the impact of allowable solutions on EPCs and BREEAM credits is awaited.

Page 24: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

ExemplarCase Studies

DistributionWarehouse

24

Capital: £1.486mkgCO2/m2/yr: 24.5EPC: A24BREEAM* Ene 01: 0

Capital: £1.486mkgCO2/m2/yr: 23.5EPC: A23BREEAM* Ene 01: 2

Capital: £1.562mkgCO2/m2/yr: 19.6EPC: A19BREEAM* Ene 01: 7

*BREEAM UK New Construction 2011. For LEED contributions, please contact Kingspan Technical Department.

Enhance

d

Capital Cost: £1.486m

Enhance

d

Capital C

ost: £1.4

86m

Part L 2010Regulatory Compliance

Part L 2013Regulatory Compliance

20%Carbon Reduction

■ Capital Cost: £0 increase■ NPV: Up to £9/m2 (40 years)■ IRR: No cost■ ROI: No cost■ EPC: From A24 to A23■ BREEAM Ene 01: From 0 to 2 credits

Building ParametersHeated (18°C), no cooling, 24 hours per day,7 days per week with a floor area of 4,900m2.Located in Newcastle.

Typical Distribution WarehouseBuilding going from Part L 2010 to

Part L 2013using an enhanced envelopeachieves the following:

Page 25: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

ExemplarCase Studies

25

DistributionWarehouse

Capital: £1.644mkgCO2/m2/yr: 14.7EPC: A14BREEAM* Ene 01: 10

Capital: £1.679mkgCO2/m2/yr: 12.2EPC: A12BREEAM* Ene 01: 11

Capital: £1.768mkgCO2/m2/yr: 0EPC: **BREEAM* Ene 01: **

40%Carbon Reduction

50%Carbon Reduction

Net-Zero EnergyBuilding

Backs

top

Capital C

ost: £1.6

53m

Enhance

d

Capital C

ost: £1.6

79m

8.7% reduction inenergy consumption

Part L2010

Part L2013

20%improvement

40%improvement

50%improvement

NZEB

Carbon Emissions

Compliance

Cap

ital

Co

st (£

m)

Car

bo

n (k

gC

O2/

m2 /

yr)

1.20

1.30

1.40

1.50

1.80

1.70

1.60

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Capital Cost

**Confirmation of the impact of allowable solutions on EPCs and BREEAM credits is awaited.

Page 26: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

26

Kingspan Insulated Panels’ products can help achieve credits in the

following categories:

Materials■ Green Guide Ratings of A+.

■ Compliance with ISO 14001:2004 demonstrating that productscontain responsibly sourced materials.

■ Environmental Profiling by the Building Research Establishment(BRE) for certain products.

Energy ■ Reduction of carbon emissions and energy consumption.

■ Photovoltaic systems.

Health & Wellbeing■ Free from Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC’s) emissions.

■ Daylighting and lighting solutions.

■ High performance accoustic solutions and advice.

Waste■ Pallets, plastic packaging, etc, collected from site after delivery,helping reduce on-site waste during construction.

Pollution■ Reduction of NOx emissons from buildings.

■ Gutter/rainwater design calculations.

Innovation■ Various innovation credits particularly in the ‘Energy’ category.

BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental

Assessment Method) is the world’s leading environmental

assessment procedure.

BREEAM* is divided into 10 categories, each carrying different

weightings.

“Recent analysis has shownthat Kingspan Insulated Panels’products can contributedirectly up to 28% of creditsunder BREEAM and up to 27of the 110 points availablewithin LEED accreditation.”

Green BuildingRatings BREEAM

Water

6%

Management

12%

Transport

8%

Materials

12.5%

Waste

7.5%

Land Use& Ecology

10% Health &Wellbeing

15%

Pollution

10%

Energy

19%

An additional 10% is awarded to innovation.

*BREEAM UK New Construction 2011.

Page 27: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

27

Kingspan Insulated Panels’ products can help achieve credits in the

following categories:

Materials & Resources■ 100% reusable.

■ Pallets, plastic packaging, etc, collected on site after delivery, helping reduce waste on site during construction.

■ Insulated Panels typically contain 14.5% to 17.5% recycledcontent.

■ Approved environmental profiling available for most products.

Energy & Atmosphere ■ Reduction of carbon emissions and energy consumption.

■ Photovoltaic systems.

Indoor Environmental Quality■ Free from Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC’s) emissions.

■ Daylighting and lighting solutions.

■ High performance accoustic solutions and advice.

Sustainable Sites■ Envelope solutions with high solar reflective coatings.

■ Gutter/rainwater design calculations.

Innovation in Design■ LEED Accredited Professionals (LEED AP) working in thebusiness.

■ Products eligible for innovation on a project specific bases.

LEED v4 (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design),

is the world’s second most widely adopted environmental

assessment method.

LEED is divided into 8 categories, again, each carrying different

weightings.

Green BuildingRatings LEED

Sustainable Sites

10 pts

IntegrativeProcess

1 pt

Innovationin Design

6 pts

Materials &Resources

13 pts

IndoorEnvironmental

Quality

16 pts

Location &Transportation

16 ptsWaterEfficiency

11 pts

RegionalPriority

4 pts

Energy &Atmosphere

33 pts

Page 28: The Value Propositionimages5.kingspanpanels.co.uk/file/asset/13998/original/... · 2014-05-27 · The Value Proposition Buildings designed with Cost Optimal Energy Saving Building

05/2014

Care has been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate, but Kingspan Limited and its subsidiary companies do not accept responsibility for errorsor for information that is found to be misleading. Suggestions for, or description of, the end use or application of products or methods of working are for information onlyand Kingspan Limited and its subsidiaries accept no liability in respect thereof.

Kingspan LimitedGreenfield Business Park No. 2, Greenfield, Holywell, Flintshire, North Wales CH8 7GJt: +44 (0) 1352 717232 f: +44 (0) 1352 710161 www.kingspanpanels.co.uk

For the product offering in other markets please contact your local sales representative or visit www.kingspanpanels.com