three trade association small business data bases
TRANSCRIPT
Three Trade Association
Small Business Data Bases
William J. Dennis, Jr.
Senior Research Fellow
NFIB Research Foundation
Academy of Management
Chicago, IL
August, 2009
Three Data Bases
• Small Business Economic Trends
– www.nfib.com/research
• National Small Business Poll
– 411smallbusinessfacts.com
• New Business in America: The Firms and
Their Owners
– Not on the Web
Small Business Economic Trends
• Topic – current and forecast economic data,
e.g., selling prices, employment, credit
conditions, inventories. 37 questions
• Data Collection – member survey. Mail.
Quarterly between Oct., 1973 and Jan.,
1986; monthly since. Currently, about
12,000 observations a year
• Data availability – both micro and aggregate
series
SBET Strengths
• Longevity – 37 years (time series)
• Consistent – most questions unchanged over time
• Frequent – monthly
• Reliable – questions patterned after Un. of Mich.’s Survey of Consumer Sentiment
• Performance – demonstrated subsequently
• Unique – nothing like it in the world
• No cost to user
SBET Weaknesses
• Sample from trade association membership,
respondents disproportionately large,
rural, manufacturers
• Response rate – between 33 percent and 17
percent
• Trends are trustworthy; levels are not
• Some questions do not date to 1973.
Tweaks made in 1982 and 1986
• Micro-responses cannot be linked over time
Currency
• Released the second
Tuesday of each month
• E-mail press release
with summary results
• Anyone can be on the
mailing list (now
consists principally of
media, investment
firms, and government
officials
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08
Net P
erc
ent
YEAR
EARNINGSActual Last Three Months
January Quarter 1974 to April Quarter 2009
(Seasonally Adjusted)
NFIB Research Foundation
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08
Actual
Planned
Net P
erc
ent
YEAR
PRICESActual Last Three Months and Planned Next Three Months
January Quarter 1974 to April Quarter 2009
(Seasonally Adjusted)
NFIB Research Foundation
THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97 '00
'03
'06
'09
Perc
en
t o
f F
irm
s
PREDICTED ACTUAL
Q3 BASED ON JUNE DATA 8.8%
Wall Street is a Major User
Wall Street Analysis
More Wall Street Analysis
National Small Business Poll
• Topic – various, each Poll is a different topic, e. g., Families in Business, IT Issues, Payroll, Innovation
• Data Collection – stratified random sample of small employers (<250 empl.) from D&B files. N ≈ 750 per Poll. Telephone. Conducted by The Gallup Organization.
• Data Availability – micro data with NAICs, employees, or zip consolidated
NSBP Strengths
• Sampling and survey conduct
• Stratification includes 200 cases of 20+ employee firms in each survey
• 63 separate polls (variety)
• Isolated facts (unusual questions); research ideas
• Preview survey questions, response, and Ns on-line
• No cost to user
NSBP Weaknesses
• Lacks depth, detail
• Questions gather general information, facts,
evaluations; not hypothesis driven
• Samples always of general population,
meaning problems, issues of subsets
not (infrequently) addressed
• Profitability (finance), growth measures poor
Sample Topics in the Series
• Workplace Safety
• Reinvesting in the Business
• Contributions to Community
• Business Structure
• Training Employees
• Energy Consumption
• IT Issues
• Credit Cards
411 Home Page
411 Data Page
New Business in America
• Antecedent to the PSED
• 3 year longitudinal survey – 1985 - 1987
• Businesses <18 months old
– Yr 1 – 2994 cases
– Yr 2 – 1190 cases
– Yr 3 – 877 cases
– Could not identify final status of only 1 case
• Sampling frame – NFIB membership file
Sample Topics Addressed
• Strategy – same questions all three years
• Major changes
• Sales problems
• Time allocation
• Capital sources and additions
• Franchised sales
• Expected success
• Reasons for entry
• Personal satisfaction
• Changes in ownership structure
• Information sources
• Preparation, including prior business experience
Why Consider Using the Set?
• PSED more comprehensive, more recent, reaches people earlier in the process, and is methodologically superior
• Why use the New Business in America set?
– Easier to use; less intimidating
– Some differences and emphases
– Annual intervals
– Know the three year survival status of everyone; increases number of cases to work with
Publications from New Bus. In Am.
• Do Entrepreneurial Goals Matter? Resource Allocation in New Owner-Managed Firms. Dunkelberg, Moore, Scott, Stull, under review, 2009
• Survival of the fittest? Entry human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Gimeno, Folta, Cooper, ASQ, Dec. 1997
• Determinants of satisfaction for entre-preneurs. Cooper, Artz, JBV, 1995
More Publications
• Reinvestment decisions by entrepreneurs: Rational decision-making or escalation of commitment? McCarthy, Schoorman, Cooper, JBV, Jan 1993
• Entrepreneurship and the initial size of firms. Cooper, Woo, Dunkelberg, JBV, September, 1989
• Entrepreneurs perceived chances for success. Cooper, Woo, Dunkelberg, JBV, Spring 1988